D Iversity and Fem Ale P Olitical P Articipation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Women and Islamic Law Christie S
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2008 Lifting the Veil: Women and Islamic Law Christie S. Warren William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Warren, Christie S., "Lifting the Veil: Women and Islamic Law" (2008). Faculty Publications. 99. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/99 Copyright c 2008 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs LIFTING THE VEIL: WOMEN AND ISLAMIC LAW CHRISTIES. WARREN * "Treat your women well and be kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers." From the Farewell Address of the Holy Prophet Muhammad1 I. INTRODUCTION By the end of February 632 and at the age of sixty-three, the Prophet Muhammad believed that his days on earth were coming to an end.2 He announced to his followers that he would lead the hajj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca, himself that year.3 On March 3, the Prophet delivered his farewell sermon near Mount Arafat.4 Among the limited number of topics he chose to include in his last public speech, he encouraged his followers to deal justly with one another and treat women well. 5 In the modem era, the rights of women under Islamic law have come under heightened scrutiny. Some commentators find the Prophet's farewell speech to be inconsistent with the way women are treated in some areas of the Muslim world. In Saudi Arabia, for example, women may neither drive nor vote. -
Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf Crisis and the Federal Budget Deficit
Address before a joint session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf crisis and the federal budget deficit. Powers and Principalities This WordPress.com site is The tAhme ecraitc’as npsa jwamitha Ds isabilities Act Conspiracy Blog Stats 11,545 hits The American with Disabilities Act Conspiracy The American with Disabilities Act was not the social security disability retirement act, and the timing of the enactment of the legislation by President George HW Bush on July 26, 1990 was an “inclusion” fraud and conspiracy with me specifically in mind, my postal hiring (orientation) had been scheduled approximately at least two months prior to my starting date of July 30, 1990. George HW Bush was Congressman from Texas, Ambassador to China, Central Intelligence director, and Vice president of the United States for eight years and President for four years. The invasion into Kuwait on August 2, 1990 was an intentional scheme act. Jury duty beginning January 14, 1991 was an extension of the scheme, with Saddam Hussein’s deadline to withdraw troops from Kuwait being on January 16, 1991 and the declaration of Desert Storm, a name chosen from the bible…..Daniel chapter 11. The 9/11/90 New World Order speech was the first speech I watched the president make as a new Federal employee. A five point speech. The directions and recommendation to fill out an EEO after the Waco, Texas siege that ended April 19, 1993, had begun was a continuation with the War crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The timing of proposed resolutions and nominations and resolution passage and confirmations, with the presumed foresight of those involved of the conclusions of the motions. -
Convention on Nuclear Safety Eighth Organizational Meeting of Contracting Parties
Convention on Nuclear Safety Eighth Organizational Meeting of Contracting Parties 17 October 2018 Report of the President 1. Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules of Procedure and Financial Rules of the Convention on Nuclear Safety, the Organizational Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Nuclear Safety was held at the Headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna on 17 October 2018. 65 out of 85 Contracting Parties participated, namely: Albania, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Korea (Republic of), Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Montenegro, Myanmar, Netherlands, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States of America, Vietnam and Euratom. The list of participants is attached as Annex I. 2. The Meeting adopted the proposed agenda as shown in Annex II. 3. Based on a report by the Office of Legal Affairs, the Meeting accepted the credentials of the delegates as presented by the Contracting Parties participating in the Organizational Meeting on the understanding that those delegations that had so far not submitted credentials in the proper form would do so as soon as possible. 4. The Meeting decided to establish seven Country Groups for the 8th Review Meeting. Pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules of Procedure and Financial Rules, the Meeting allocated Contracting Parties to Country Groups using the method described in Annex III of the Guidelines regarding the Review Process under the Convention on Nuclear Safety. -
Why Repealing the 1991 and 2002 Iraq War Authorizations Is Sound Policy Charles D
LEGAL MEMORANDUM No. 256 | JANUARY 6, 2020 EDWIN MEESE III CENTER FOR LEGAL & JUDICIAL STUDIES Why Repealing the 1991 and 2002 Iraq War Authorizations Is Sound Policy Charles D. Stimson he Constitution’s allocation of war powers KEY TAKEAWAYS between the legislative and executive branches is a classic example of the sepa- T 1 The 1991 and 2002 AUMF Against Iraq ration of powers. The Congress has the power to Resolutions remain in force even though declare war but cannot fight the war on its own. The their purpose has been accomplished. President, as commander in chief of the Army and Navy, has (and has uniformly claimed) the authority to use military forces abroad in the absence of specific Repeal would not affect the 2001 AUMF, prior congressional approval.2 This authority derives the primary domestic statutory authority from his constitutional responsibility as commander for the war against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, in chief and chief executive for foreign and military ISIS, or associated forces. affairs. Without money from Congress, however, the President has no ability to fight those conflicts, nor Debating and repealing those war does he have the authority to appropriate funds to pay authorizations is a matter of congres- for those military conflicts on his own. sional hygiene and gets the Congress This tension between the legislative and executive back in the business of exercising its Article I muscles. branches was purposeful, as the Founders anticipated the grave significance of the country’s going to war. This paper, in its entirety, can be found at http://report.heritage.org/lm256 The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress. -
Approval Page
1 ROWLANDS, MINA SIMON PG/M.Sc/10/57312 UNITED NATIONS AND THE MANAGEMENT OF ECONOMIC SANCTIONS IN IRAQ, 1990-2003 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCES, FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA Political Science UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA 2011 Digitally Signed by Webmaster‟s Name DN : CN = Webmaster‟s name O= University of Nigeria, Nsukka Webmaster OU = Innovation Centre 2 UNITED NATIONS AND THE MANAGEMENT OF ECONOMIC SANCTIONS IN IRAQ, 1990-2003 BY ROWLANDS, MINA SIMON PG/M.Sc/10/57312 DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE FACULTY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA NOVEMBER, 2011 3 TITLE PAGE UNITED NATIONS AND THE MANAGEMENT OF ECONOMIC SANCTIONS IN IRAQ, 1990-2003 BY ROWLANDS, MINA SIMON PG/M.Sc/10/57312 A PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, FACULTY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA NSUKKA, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (M.Sc) IN POLITICAL SCIENCE (INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS). NOVEMBER, 2011 4 APPROVAL PAGE THIS PROJECT REPORT HAS BEEN APPROVED ON BEHALF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA. BY ………………………………….. …………………………………. DR. A.M.N. OKOLIE PROF. OBASI IGWE (PROJECT SUPERVISOR) (HEAD OF DEPARTMENT) ……………………………….. .……………………………… PROF. E.O. EZEANI EXTERNAL EXAMINER (DEAN OF FACULTY) 5 DEDICATION This Work Is Dedicated to the Memory of My Late-Mother, Mrs. Abowari Innocent Rowlands, who laid the foundation for my academic pursuits; but unfortunately could not live to see me get to this level. 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT In carrying out this research, a lot of individuals contributed immensely, and as such they deserve to be acknowledged. -
E/2015/49 Economic and Social Council
United Nations E/2015/49 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 13 April 2015 Original: English 2015 session 21 July 2014-22 July 2015 Agenda item 19 (c) Social and human rights questions: crime prevention and criminal justice Capital punishment and implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty Report of the Secretary-General Summary The Economic and Social Council, by its resolution 1745 (LIV) of 16 May 1973, invited the Secretary-General to submit to it, at five-year intervals starting from 1975, periodic updated and analytical reports on capital punishment. The Council, by its resolution 1995/57 of 28 July 1995, recommended that the quinquennial reports of the Secretary-General should continue to cover also the implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty. By the same resolution, the Council requested the Secretary-General, in preparing the quinquennial report, to draw on all available data, including current criminological research. The present ninth quinquennial report reviews the use of and trends in capital punishment, including the implementation of the safeguards during the period 2009-2013. In accordance with Economic and Social Council resolutions 1745 (LIV) and 1990/51 and Council decision 2005/247, the present report is submitted to the Council at its substantive session of 2015, and will also be before the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice at its twenty-fourth session, and the Human Rights Council at its twenty-eighth session. The report confirms the continuation of a very marked trend towards abolition and restriction of the use of capital punishment in most countries. -
Political Islam in Algeria
Political Islam in Algeria CEPS Working Document No. 268/May 2007 Amel Boubekeur Abstract The recent legislative elections of May 2007 in Algeria have shown how complex the evolution of Islamist parties is in this country and how crucial an understanding of these mechanisms has become for Europe. Since the civil war of the 1990s, Islamist parties have experienced increased political participation. Drawing on interviews with various Algerian Islamist actors, this paper analyses how Islamist parties are building a new relationship with democratic mechanisms in Europe. In light of these recent changes, a reconsideration of EU democracy promotion policies is now necessary. CEPS Working Documents are intended to give an indication of work being conducted within CEPS research programmes and to stimulate reactions from other experts in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the author in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which she is associated. ISBN-13: 978-92-9079-721-0 Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (http://www.ceps.eu) © Boubekeur, 2007 Contents The Evolution of the MSP and the MNR...................................................................................... 1 Activities with European Muslims................................................................................................5 The Failure of Europe as a Democratic Model ............................................................................. 7 Areas of Potential Collaboration with -
THE GLOBAL EVENT-DATA SYSTEM: Coders' Manual
THE GLOBAL EVENT-DATA SYSTEM: Coders' Manual John L. Davies Center for International Development and Conflict Management and Department of Government and Politics College Park MD August 1998 Revision The Global Event-Data System Coders' Manual John L. Davies Center for International Development and Conflict Management and Department of Government and Politics Tydings Hall #0145 University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 August, 1998 Revision This project has received support from the National Science Foundation (SES90-25130—Data Development for International Research), the US Department of Defense (N41756-95-C-4814), the Swiss Peace Foundation, the University of Maryland, the University of Illinois, and other sources. CONTENTS Overview... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... … 4 GEDS Coding Procedures 1. Basic Steps in Generating Event-Data (identification, summary, analytical coding and editing) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 6 2. Sample Event Records … ... ... ... ... ... ... … 9 3. Identifying an Event 3.1 Core structure ... ... ... ... ... ... ... … 12 3.2 Observable behavior only ... ... ... ... ... … 12 3.3 (Inter)national significance ... ... ... ... ... … 13 3.4 Multiple interrelated events, one article ... ... ... … 13 3.5 Multiple articles, one event ... ... ... ... ... … 14 3.6 Headlined event coding... ... ... ... ... ... … 15 3.7 International vs. domestic events ... ... ... ... … 15 4. Event Summary and Quotes 4.1 General structure ... ... ... ... ... ... … 17 4.2 Lead sentence ... ... ... ... ... ... ... … 17 4.3 Key elements 4.3.1 #Actor & agent# ... ... ... ... ... … 18 4.3.2 ~Action-phrase~ ... ... ... ... ... … 18 4.3.3 *Target & agent* ... ... ... ... ... … 19 4.3.4 Others affected ... ... ... ... ... … 20 4.3.5 Date ... ... ... ... ... ... ... … 20 4.3.6 ^Location^ ... ... ... ... ... ... … 20 {page \* arabic} 4.3.7 <Institutional context>... ... ... ... ... … 20 4.3.8 For verbal actions: object and conditions ... … … 20 4.3.9 Other contextual information ... ... ... ... … 20 4.3.10 [Casualties], refugees, prisoners etc .. -
1907475* A/Hrc/28/2
United Nations A/HRC/28/2 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 May 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty-eighth session Agenda item 1 Organizational and procedural matters Report of the Human Rights Council on its twenty-eighth session Vice-President and Rapporteur : Mothusi Bruce Rabasha Palai (Botswana) GE.19-07475(E) *1907475* A/HRC/28/2 Contents Page Part One: Resolutions, decisions and President’s statements adopted by the Human Rights Council at its twenty-eighth session ........................................................................................................... 4 I. Resolutions .................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Decisions ....................................................................................................................................... 5 III. President’s statements ................................................................................................................... 6 Part Two: Summary of proceedings ............................................................................................................... 7 I. Organizational and procedural matters .......................................................................................... 7 A. Opening and duration of the session ..................................................................................... 7 B. Attendance ........................................................................................................................... -
Effects of Modernization and Globalization on Values Change in the Arab World
Changing Societies & Personalities, 2018 Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 161–182 http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/csp.2018.2.2.035 ARTICLE Effects of Modernization and Globalization on Values Change in the Arab World Malek Abduljaber Saginaw Valley State University, Ann Arbor, USA ABSTRACT This paper argues that social transformation processes generate shifts in public opinion among the public. More specifically, increasing rates of modernization and globalization in the Arab world over the past half century have led to a moving away from religion, tradition, and ethnocentrism to embracing more secular, liberal, and egalitarian values. Ordinary citizens in today’s Arab world are more tolerant towards non-Muslims, Americans, and other Westerners more than ever before. They support recognizing Israel as a state at a rate previously unprecedented in the region. Arabs are politically, socially, and culturally more liberal than they have been in the twentieth century. Evidence from the World Values Survey and Arab Barometer clearly convey this observable value change in the region. Underlying causes for this change are arguably due to macro, mezzo, and micro-level changes in peoples’ lives resulting from increased modernization and globalization compared to earlier periods. This confirms earlier findings from Western Europe and North America which propose that social transformation processes yield predictable changes in values among mass publics. KEYWORDS modernization, globalization, public opinion, Arab world, survey research Received 26 March 2018 © 2018 Malek Abduljaber Accepted 29 May 2018 [email protected] Published online 1 July 2018 162 Malek Abduljaber Introduction There are many questions about the Arab world that have remained unanswered by political science (Campante & Chor, 2012; Hamarneh, Hollis, & Shiqāqī, 1997; Lynch, 2013; Ryan & Schwedler, 2004; Tessler & Jamal, 2006; Tessler, et al., 2012; Zogby, 2002; Bayat, 2013). -
Veiled Political Questions: Islamic Dress, Constitutionalism, and the Ascendance of Courts
Veiled Political Questions: Islamic Dress, Constitutionalism, and the Ascendance of Courts The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Goldenziel, Jill I. 2012. “Veiled Political Questions: Islamic Dress, Constitutionalism, and the Ascendance of Courts.” American Journal of Comparative Law 61 (1) (October 15): 1–50. doi:10.5131/ ajcl.2012.0015. Published Version 10.5131/AJCL.2012.0015 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:25484695 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA \\jciprod01\productn\C\COM\61-1\COM107.txt unknown Seq: 1 7-DEC-12 12:44 JILL I. GOLDENZIEL* Veiled Political Questions: Islamic Dress, Constitutionalism, and the Ascendance of Courts† This Article explains how judicial independence can develop in regimes that are not fully democratic. Conventional wisdom holds that a strong legislature and political parties are necessary for the emergence of an independent judiciary. This Article challenges con- ventional wisdom by explaining how judicial independence may arise in the absence of these conditions. It presents a theory of how judicial independence emerges and why and when other political actors will respect it. It also explains why courts may be better poised than legis- latures to counter executive power in non-democracies. The theory is developed through a discussion of cases involving Islamic headscarves and veils in Middle Eastern courts. -
The Iraq Crisis
CSIS__________________________________________ Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Phone: (202) 775-3270 Fax: (202) 466-4740 Internet: CSIS.ORG The Iraq Crisis: A Chronology of the “War of Sanctions” Anthony H. Cordesman Co-Director CSIS Middle East Studies Program December 2, 1998 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. Iraq Crisis: Background Chronology 12/4/98 Page 2 88-3-16: Iraq bombards Halabja with mustard gas and nerve gas in an attempt to disband an Iranian force and Kurdish rebels that had captured this city twenty four hours earlier. More than 5,000 people, mainly civilians, lose their lives after being blinded, burned or asphyxiated by the deadly gas. 91-1-12: Congress authorizes the President to use US Armed Forces to implement some of the UN resolutions in Public Law 102-1 (H.J.Res. 77), passed by Congress on Jan. 12, 1991, and signed into law by President Bush on Jan. 14, 1991. Congress reaffirms its approval of the use of force against Iraq in the Defense Authorization Act for FY1992 (Section 1095, P.L. 102-190, Dec. 5, 1991). 91-2-1: US and allies drive Iraqi forces from Kuwait. Later in the year US, British and French planes start patrolling Iraq's northern skies to shield Iraq's Kurds from attack by Iraq. 91-3-1: Kurdish minority launches insurrection but are also crushed. Thousands flee or die of exposure in the mountains. The US, Britain and France establish a "safe haven" for the Kurds north of the 36th parallel, an area from which Iraqi planes are banned.