DOCSLIB.ORG

Commission for the Geological Map of the World 60 Years of Russia's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commission for the Geological Map of the World 60 Years of Russia's Commission for the Geological Map of the World President: Philippe Rossi Secretary General: Manuel Pubellier Commission for the Geological Map of the World 60 years of Russia’s participation O. Petrov Vice-President of the CGMW Subcommission for Northern Eurasia S. Shokalsky Secretary General of the CGMW Subcommission for Northern Eurasia G. Grikurov Vice-President of the CGMW Subcommission for Antarctica (1991–2008) G. Leichenkov Vice-President of the CGMW Subcommission for Antarctica I. Pospelov Secretary General of the CGMW Subcommission for Tectonic Maps VSEGEI Publishing House St. Petersburg • 2016 UDС 35.082.6:005.745:550.8:528(470:100) Commission for the Geological Map of the World 60 years of Russia’s participation. Authors O. Petrov, S. Shokalsky, G. Grikurov, G. Leichenkov, I. Pospelov. – SPb.: VSEGEI Publishing House, 2016. – 32 p. ISBN 978-5-93761-248-9 The booklet describes the brief history of 60-year participation of Russian scientists in the work of the Commission for the Geological Map of the World (CGMW). 9 785937 612489 © A. P. Karpinsky Russian Geological ISBN 978-5-93761-248-9 Research Institute, 2016 INTRODUCTION The Commission for the Geological Map of the World (CGMW) is an international non- profi t association governed by French law and is responsible for designing, coordinating, preparing and publishing small-scale thematic Earth Science maps of the globe, continent, major regions and oceans. The CGMW is affi liated to the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) and the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), and is supported by UNESCO. CGMW story in a nutshell. The CGMW is issued from the International Geological Congress (IGC), the oldest geoscience organization in the World, created in Paris in 1878. The idea of the Commission was fi rst postulated in 1910 at the 11th IGC in Stockholm, and established in 1913 at the 12th IGC in Toronto. It is a non-profi t-making scientifi c and educational association governed by French law. The CGMW is affi liated to the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) since 1966, and to the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG). CGMW is recognized by UNESCO as a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO). A wide range of geoscience mapping. The CGMW is responsible for designing, promoting, coordinating, preparing and publishing small-scale thematic (geology, tectonics, ore deposits, natural resources, climate, etc.) Earth Science maps of the globe, continents, major regions, and oceans. In the context of its mission, the CGMW intends to play a leading role in the use and diffusion of digital cartographic techniques, as well as in the development of international standards. How the work is done? The framework for constructing CGMW maps is highly fl exible. The responsibility for each new cartographic project is assigned to a General Coordinator appointed by the Bureau to act as organizer and supervisor. To produce these maps, the CGMW relies on the support provided by the international scientifi c community and on cooperation agreements established with geological surveys, university laboratories, oceanographic institutes and industrial fi rms, depending on the characteristics of each project. Before their publication, 4 all maps are submitted to the review of experts in order to ensure the best scientifi c quality to all CGMW releases. Who are our members and how the Commission is managed? Geological Surveys (or similar organizations responsible for national geological mapping) of countries and territories throughout the World are Statutory Members of the CGMW. Other scientifi c and/or industrial organizations can join the CGMW as Associate Members. The mapping activity is fi nanced by the membership fees of the Surveys, IUGS and UNESCO grants and the sponsoring of industrial partners. The Executive Bureau is ensured by a President, a Secretary General and the heads of the geographic and thematic subcommissions that represent all the continents and the different disciplines of the geosciences. A score of key fi gures from different Earth Science fi elds and countries are appointed to fulfi ll these ad hoc positions. General Assembly. General Assemblies are held every two years, alternately at the UNESCO headquarters in Paris, and during the International Geological Congress. A focal point of these meetings is to assess the aims of future programs and the progress of current cartographic projects. (http://ccgm.org/en/content/4-about-us) RUSSIAN REPRESENTATION IN THE COMMISSION FOR THE GEOLOGICAL MAP OF THE WORLD At present, there are three Subcommissions headed by Russian geologists in the Commission for the Geological Map of the World (CGMW). These are two “continental” Subcommissions for Northern Eurasia (Vice-President is Dr. О. V. Petrov, Director General, A. P. Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI), Secretary General Dr. S. P. Shokalsky, Head of Department, VSEGEI) and for Antarctica (Vice-President is Dr. G. L. Leichenkov, Head of Department, VNIIOkeangeologia), and one thematic: Subcommission for Tectonic Maps (President is Dr. N. B. Kuznetsov, Secretary General Dr. I. I. Pospelov, Head of Lab for Tectonic Maps, Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences). Currently, there are fi ve (of 32) members, heads of Subcommissions, from Russia in the Bureau of the Commission for the Geological Map of the World. Subcommission for Northern Eurasia is leading in the CGMW as concerns compilation of geological maps for the area of the former USSR, adjacent water areas and countries. The Subcommission for Northern Eurasia in cooperation with geological surveys of China, Kazakhstan, Mongolia and Korea, in 2008 completed the compilation of geological, tectonic (jointly with the Subcommission for Tectonic Maps), metallogenic, and energy resources maps under the international project Atlas of Geological Maps of Central Asia and Adjacent Areas, scale 1 : 2,500,000. The Atlas received a high appraisal of the international scientifi c community at the 33rd International Geological Congress in Oslo (Norway, 2008). Compilation of the Atlas of Geological Maps of Northern-Central-Eastern Asia and Adjacent Areas, scale 1 : 2,500,000, with already published Tectonic Map and Explanatory Notes to it as well as the Metallogenic Map, is nearing completion. In 2009, the Subcommission started compilation of the Tectonic Map of the Circum Arctic, scale 1 : 5,000,000, as part of the international project Atlas of Geological Maps of the Arctic, scale 1 : 5,000,000. Geological and geophysical maps have been completed under the project. 6 VSEGEI, VNIIOkeangeologia, MAGE, RAS Geological Institute, experts from other RAS institutes and western geologists from geological surveys and scientifi c institutions of the Cis- Arctic states have taken part in the compilation of the tectonic map. Subcommission for Tectonic Maps is leading in CGMW as concerns designing, compiling, and preparing for publication of tectonic maps of continents and the globe. Now it takes active part in the compilation of the International Tectonic Map of Asia, 1 : 5,000,000 (ITMA-5000). 7 In 2005–2012, both Subcommissions participated in a major CGMW project International Geological Map of Asia, scale 1 : 5,000,000 – IGMA-5000, which was compiled by the CGMW Subcommission for South and East Asia under the supervision of Vice-President of CGMW Subcommission for South and East Asia CAS Academician Ren Jishun. In 2013, the map was published in Beijing Cartographic Publishing House with the logos of UNESCO, IUGS, and CGMW. In 2012, the Subcommission for Antarctica completed the International Tectonic Map of Antarcticа, scale 1 : 10,000,000. It was published by the 34th International Geological Congress in Brisbane (Australia, 2012), where it received a high appraisal at GEOEXPO-2012. 8 CGMW SUBCOMMISSION FOR NORTHERN EURASIA Formation of the Subcommission for Northern Eurasia has a rather long and interesting history. Dmitry V. Nalivkin (Academician from 1946) made great efforts for its establishing. As far back as 1937, the Geological Map of the USSR, scale 1 : 5,000,000 edited by D. V. Nalivkin was published by the 17th International Geological Congress in Moscow; it caused a huge scientifi c and practical response in Soviet and western geological communities. This map and the Geological Map of the USSR, scale 1 : 2,500,000 published in 1940 and also edited by D. V. Nalivkin, were used as a basis for the monograph Geology of the USSR marking the beginning of systematic studying the geological structure of the vast area of most of Europe and Asia. Thirteen geological maps of the USSR edited by D. V. Nalivkin were published by 1983. The Geological Map of the USSR, scale 1 : 2,500,000 (1956) N. A. Belyaevsky (1913–1978) without “white spots” won Grand-Prix at the World Exhibition in Brussels in Vice-President of the CGMW Subcommission for the USSR 1958 similar to two tectonic maps of the USSR published in 1953 and 1956. in 1961–1965 Extensive practical experience in the compilation of geological maps of the USSR for one sixth of the land area of the Earth and the international recognition of the country’s success in geological mapping was the reason for creating in 1960 the Subcommission for the USSR as part of the Commission for the Geological Map of the World. At the 21st International Geological Congress (Copenhagen, 1960), the CGMW General Assembly approved the creation of the Subcommission for the USSR in the rank of “continental” taking into account achievements of Soviet geologists in the compilation of geological (and tectonic; Subcommission for Tectonic Maps had been established four years earlier) maps on a huge area of 22 million km2. As during this Assembly Academician D. V. Nalivkin, on the recommendation of the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences and as Chairman of the Commission of the USSR Academy of Sciences for International Tectonic Maps was elected President of the CGMW Subcommission for Tectonic Maps, it was agreed that the Ministry of Geology of the USSR would delegate a CGMW Vice-President for the USSR to the Commission.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • Siberia, the Wandering Northern Terrane, and Its Changing Geography Through the Palaeozoic ⁎ L
    Earth-Science Reviews 82 (2007) 29–74 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Siberia, the wandering northern terrane, and its changing geography through the Palaeozoic ⁎ L. Robin M. Cocks a, , Trond H. Torsvik b,c,d a Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK b Center for Geodynamics, Geological Survey of Norway, Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, Trondheim, N-7401, Norway c Institute for Petroleum Technology and Applied Geophysics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 NTNU, Norway d School of Geosciences, Private Bag 3, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS, 2050, South Africa Received 27 March 2006; accepted 5 February 2007 Available online 15 February 2007 Abstract The old terrane of Siberia occupied a very substantial area in the centre of today's political Siberia and also adjacent areas of Mongolia, eastern Kazakhstan, and northwestern China. Siberia's location within the Early Neoproterozoic Rodinia Superterrane is contentious (since few if any reliable palaeomagnetic data exist between about 1.0 Ga and 540 Ma), but Siberia probably became independent during the breakup of Rodinia soon after 800 Ma and continued to be so until very near the end of the Palaeozoic, when it became an integral part of the Pangea Supercontinent. The boundaries of the cratonic core of the Siberian Terrane (including the Patom area) are briefly described, together with summaries of some of the geologically complex surrounding areas, and it is concluded that all of the Palaeozoic underlying the West Siberian
    [Show full text]
  • Crustal Structure of the Siberian Craton and the West Siberian Basin: an Appraisal of Existing Seismic Data
    Tectonophysics 609 (2013) 154–183 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Review Article Crustal structure of the Siberian craton and the West Siberian basin: An appraisal of existing seismic data Yulia Cherepanova ⁎, Irina M. Artemieva, Hans Thybo, Zurab Chemia Geology Section, IGN, University of Copenhagen, Denmark article info abstract Article history: We present a digital model SibCrust of the crustal structure of the Siberian craton (SC) and the West Siberian Received 17 August 2012 basin (WSB), based on all seismic profiles published since 1960 and sampled with a nominal interval of Received in revised form 22 April 2013 50 km. Data quality is assessed and quantitatively assigned to each profile based on acquisition and interpreta- Accepted 7 May 2013 tion method and completeness of crustal model. The database represents major improvement in coverage and Available online 14 May 2013 resolution and includes depth to Moho, thickness and average P-wave velocity of five crustal layers (sediments, and upper, middle, lower, and lowermost crust) and Pn velocity. Maps and cross sections demonstrate strong Keywords: Moho crustal heterogeneity, which correlates weakly with tectono-thermal age and strongly with tectonic setting. Crustal structure Sedimentary thickness varies from 0–3 km in stable craton to 10–20 km in extended regions. Typical Moho Seismic velocities depths are 44–48 km in Archean crust and up-to 54 km around the Anabar shield, 40–42 km in Proterozoic Siberian craton orogens, 35–38 km in extended cratonic crust, and 38–42 km in the West Siberian basin. Average crustal Vp ve- West Siberian basin locity is similar for the SC and the WSB and shows a bimodal distribution with peaks at ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Volga-Don Orocline Stitching Volgo-Sarmatia
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 14, EGU2012-11762, 2012 EGU General Assembly 2012 © Author(s) 2012 The Volga-Don orocline stitching Volgo-Sarmatia S. V. Bogdanova (1), A.V. Postnikov (2), and E.V. Bibikova (3) (1) Department of Geology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ([email protected]), (2) I.M.Gubkin State University of Oil and Gas, Moscow, Russia ([email protected]) , (3) Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, RAS, Moscow, Russia ([email protected]) The crustal segments of Volgo-Uralia and Sarmatia occupy about half of the territory of the East European Craton. They differ from its Fennoscandian part by featuring large Early Archaean blocks and 2.1-2.0 Ga orogenic belts. The Volga-Don belt, which separates Archaean Volgo-Uralia from likewise Archaean eastern Sarmatia (the Oskol-Azov megablock) is one of the intracratonic collisional orogens that stitched together various Sarmatian terranes and Volgo-Uralia during the assembly of megacontinent Volgo-Sarmatia. The Volga-Don orogen is an orocline, NS-trending in the south, but bending and wedging out in the northwest where Sarmatia and Volgo-Uralia were brought into close contact caused by their oblique collision. It extends for more than 600 km and is very wide in the southeast, embracing several tectonic terranes, bounded by strike slip- and thrust faults. There, the Volga-Don orogen comprises the following terranes from the east to the west: (1) The wide South Volga province made up of metasedimentary migmatites and S-type garnet-bearing granitoids of granulite and amphibolite facies having NdTDM isotopic ages between 2.4 and 2.1 Ga.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessions Calendar
    Associated Societies GSA has a long tradition of collaborating with a wide range of partners in pursuit of our mutual goals to advance the geosciences, enhance the professional growth of society members, and promote the geosciences in the service of humanity. GSA works with other organizations on many programs and services. AASP - The American Association American Geophysical American Institute American Quaternary American Rock Association for the Palynological Society of Petroleum Union (AGU) of Professional Association Mechanics Association Sciences of Limnology and Geologists (AAPG) Geologists (AIPG) (AMQUA) (ARMA) Oceanography (ASLO) American Water Asociación Geológica Association for Association of Association of Earth Association of Association of Geoscientists Resources Association Argentina (AGA) Women Geoscientists American State Science Editors Environmental & Engineering for International (AWRA) (AWG) Geologists (AASG) (AESE) Geologists (AEG) Development (AGID) Blueprint Earth (BE) The Clay Minerals Colorado Scientifi c Council on Undergraduate Cushman Foundation Environmental & European Association Society (CMS) Society (CSS) Research Geosciences (CF) Engineering Geophysical of Geoscientists & Division (CUR) Society (EEGS) Engineers (EAGE) European Geosciences Geochemical Society Geologica Belgica Geological Association Geological Society of Geological Society of Geological Society of Union (EGU) (GS) (GB) of Canada (GAC) Africa (GSAF) Australia (GSAus) China (GSC) Geological Society of Geological Society of Geologische Geoscience
    [Show full text]
  • General Features Relating to the Occurrence of Mineral Deposits in the Urals: What, Where, When and Why
    OREGEO-01720; No of Pages 26 Ore Geology Reviews xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev General features relating to the occurrence of mineral deposits in the Urals: What, where, when and why V.N. Puchkov Institute of Geology, Ufimian Scientific Centre, 16/2 Karl Marx Street, Ufa 450077, Russia Bashkirian State University, 32 Zaki Validi Street, Ufa 450076, Russia article info abstract Article history: This study of metallogeny of the Urals is strongly tied up with a stage-by-stage geodynamic analysis of Received 19 October 2015 the orogen. The analysis includes a revised understanding of geodynamic development of the Timanides (devel- Received in revised form 15 January 2016 opment of a deep sedimentary basin since the Mesoproterozoic, ocean formation and subduction in the Accepted 18 January 2016 Neoproterozoic and collision in the Late Ediacaran). For the Uralides, a new interpretation includes relationships Available online xxxx between Tagil and Magnitogorsk arcs, arc–continent collision in the Late Devonian, subduction jump in the Early Keywords: Carboniferous, and thrust stacking in the Late Carboniferous to Permian. Attention is paid to metallogeny of the fi Timanides platform (Middle Jurassic to Paleogene) and neo-orogenic (late Cenozoic) stages. For the rst time an effort is Uralides made to consider the role of mantle plumes and superplumes in the geodynamic development and metallogeny Metallogeny of this fold belt. Many deposits are polygenetic, and different stages of their formation belong to different Geodynamic evolution geodynamic stages and substages, therefore the deposits becoming additional geodynamic indicators themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustal Structure of the Siberian Craton and the West Siberian Basin: an Appraisal of Existing Seismic Data☆
    Tectonophysics 609 (2013) 154–183 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Review Article Crustal structure of the Siberian craton and the West Siberian basin: An appraisal of existing seismic data☆ Yulia Cherepanova ⁎, Irina M. Artemieva, Hans Thybo, Zurab Chemia Geology Section, IGN, University of Copenhagen, Denmark article info abstract Article history: We present a digital model SibCrust of the crustal structure of the Siberian craton (SC) and the West Siberian Received 17 August 2012 basin (WSB), based on all seismic profiles published since 1960 and sampled with a nominal interval of Received in revised form 22 April 2013 50 km. Data quality is assessed and quantitatively assigned to each profile based on acquisition and interpreta- Accepted 7 May 2013 tion method and completeness of crustal model. The database represents major improvement in coverage and Available online 14 May 2013 resolution and includes depth to Moho, thickness and average P-wave velocity of five crustal layers (sediments, and upper, middle, lower, and lowermost crust) and Pn velocity. Maps and cross sections demonstrate strong Keywords: Moho crustal heterogeneity, which correlates weakly with tectono-thermal age and strongly with tectonic setting. Crustal structure Sedimentary thickness varies from 0–3 km in stable craton to 10–20 km in extended regions. Typical Moho Seismic velocities depths are 44–48 km in Archean crust and up-to 54 km around the Anabar shield, 40–42 km in Proterozoic Siberian craton orogens, 35–38 km in extended cratonic crust, and 38–42 km in the West Siberian basin. Average crustal Vp ve- West Siberian basin locity is similar for the SC and the WSB and shows a bimodal distribution with peaks at ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Geology of Vermont
    REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF VERMONT: DESCRIPTIVE, THEORETICAL, ECONOMICAL, AND SCENOGRAPHICAL; BY EDWARD HITCHCOCK, LL.D., ALBERT D. HAGER, A.M., EDWARD HITCHCOCK, JR., M.D., CHARLES H. HITCHCOCK, A.M., PROFESSOR OF HYGIENE AND PHYSICAL CULTURE IN AMHERST COLLEGE. GEOLOGIST TO THE STATE OF MAINE. IN TWO VOLUMES. PUBLISHED UNDER VE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE LEGISLATURE, BY ALBERT D. HAGER, PROOTORSVILLE, VT. VOL. I. PRINTED BY THE CLAREMONT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, CLAREMONT, N. 11. 1861. NQTE. The Principal of the Survey desires to state, that the publication of this Report has been entirely under the direction of Mr. A. D. HAGER. In consequence of the great increase of the matter above the original estimate, the work has been a difficult one, and demanded not only much labor, but rigid economy, and great pecuniary responsibility and sacrifice. Yet, as the public will see, it has been carried through in excellent taste, and compares most favorably with the style of analogous Reports in other States. The citizens of Vermont are certainly much indebted to Mr. Hager for his faithful, judicious and persevering efforts - without which, these volumes never could have seen the light in a form so satisfactory. It is but justice, also, to say, that Mr. Hager was fortunate in securing the services of the Messrs. Goddard, of Claremont, for the printing. Had they not possessed unusual skill in deciphering illegible manuscripts and correcting proofs, in some cases where from distance or other causes they had not passed under the eye of the authors, errors would S have abounded where now we trust they are rare.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Institute of Kola Scientific Centre of RAS
    Geological Institute of Kola Scientific Centre of RAS All-Russian Conference (with international participation): GEOLOGY AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF THE ROCK-FORMING AND ORE PROCESSES IN CRYSTALLINE SHIELDS 8-12 July 2013, Apatity The Cu-Ni-PGE and Cr deposits of the Monchegorsk area, Kola Peninsula, Russia Guidebook for geological excursions Apatity 2013 УДК 552.311 + 553.491 (470.21) Pripachkin P.V., Neradovsky Yu.N., Fedotov Zh.A., Nerovich L.I. The Cu-Ni-PGE and Cr deposits of the Monchegorsk area, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Guidebook for geological excursions. Apatity: Geological Institute KSC RAS Press, 2013. 56 p. The geology, tectonics and stratigraphy of the Monchegorsk region (Kola Peninsula, Russia) is briefly described in the guidebook. The geological structure, ore localization and mineralogy of Cu-Ni-PGE and Cr occurrences in the major layered intrusions (Monchepluton, Imandra lopolith, Monchetundra intrusion) are presented in more detail. Scientific Editor of Series: Prof. Dr. Yu.L. Voytekhovsky Computer design: L.D. Chistjakova, N.A. Mansurova Electronic version: http://geoksc.apatity.ru/publications/ Russian (with International participation) conference «Geology and geochronology of the rock-forming and ore processes in crystalline shields» is RFBR supported by RFBR (grant 13-05-06036/13) and Department of Earth Sciences of RAS. © Collective of authors © Geological Institute of Kola Scientific Centre of RAS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. 2 Geology of the Monchegorsk area . 3 THE MONCHEPluton AND associated DEPOSITS . 6 Mineral composition of the ores . 9 The ore prospects of the contact zone. 9 The ore deposits and ore prospects of the endocontact zone . 11 The ore deposits and ore prospects in plagioclase-bearing harzburgite and harzburgite .
    [Show full text]
  • The Naming of the Permian System
    Research article Journal of the Geological Society Published Online First https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2021-037 The naming of the Permian System Michael J. Benton1* and Andrey G. Sennikov2 1 School of Earth Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK 2 Borissiak Paleontological Institute RAS, Profsoyuznaya Street 123, Moscow 117647, Russia MJB, 0000-0002-4323-1824 * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The naming of the Permian by Roderick Murchison in 1841 is well known. This is partly because he ‘completed’ the stratigraphic column at the system level, but also because of the exotic aspects of his extended fieldwork in remote parts of Russia and his reputed character. Here, we explore several debated and controversial aspects of this act, benefiting from access to documents and reports from Russian sources. Murchison or Sedgwick could have provided a name for the unnamed lower New Red Sandstone in 1835 based on British successions or those in Germany, so perhaps the imperial aim of naming time from British geology was not the urgent task some have assumed. Murchison has been painted as arrogant and imperialistic, which was doubtless true, but at the time many saw him as a great leader, even an attractive individual. Others suggest he succeeded because he stood on the shoulders of local geologists; however, his abilities of brilliant and rapid geological synthesis are undoubted. Two unexpected consequences of his work are that this arch-conservative is revered in Russia as a hero of geological endeavours and, for all his bombast, his ‘Permian’ was not widely accepted until 100 years after its naming.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Volga-Ural Petroleum Province and Detailed Description of the Romashkino and Arlan Oil Fields
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geology of the Volga-Ural Petroleum Province and detailed description of the Romashkino and Arlan oil fields by James A. Peterson* and James W. Clarke^ Open-File Report 83-711 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Missoula, Montana Reston, Virginia 1983 CONTENTS Page Abstract l I n t ro du c t i on 3 History of exploration 4 Paleogeography and paleostructure 7 Introduction 9 Structural stages 10 Riphean-Vendian structural stage 12 Eifelian-Frasnian structural stage 12 Famennian-Tournaisian structural stage 13 Carboniferous-Lower Permian structural stage 14 Upper Permian and Mesozoic-Cenozoic structural stage 14 Stratigraphy and depositional facies 15 Introduction 15 Late Proterozoic 16 First Paleozoic cycle (Middle Devonian-Tournaisian) 18 Middle Devonian (Eifelian and Givetian) 19 Late Devonian (Frasnian and Famennian) 20 Tournaisian 21 Second Paleozoic Cycle (Visean, Namurian, and Bashkirian) 22 Visean (Meramecian-early Chesterian) 22 Namurian (late Chesterian) 23 Bashkirian (Morrowan-Atokan) 23 Third Paleozoic Cycle (Moscovian through Early Permian) 24 Moscovian (Desmoinesian) 24 Late Carboniferous (Missourian and Virgilian) - 25 Asselian-Sakmarian (Wolfcampian) 25 Artinskian-Kungurian (Leonardian) 26 Fourth Paleozoic cycle (Latest Early Permian and Late Ufimian-Kazanian (Guadalupian) * - 27 Tatarian (Late Guadalupian-Ochoan) 27 Mesozoic 27 Cenozoic ** " -^ 28 Hydrogeology
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of VERMONT. I:Hii
    I e -. SECOND ANNUAL REPORT ON 7Ifl GEOLOGY OF VERMONT. i:HiI • V V• V .V V V•S V V VVV; •, ..................• V - -.:'-• V V V V V V *er.'VVVV V :1 SECOND ANNUAL REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE 0 STATE OF VERMONT. 0 BY C. B. ADAMS, State Goologlst,Teof. Chem. and Nat. Hist. In Middlebury College, Corroep. member of the fleet. Soc. Nat. Iliet., of the Entom. Soc. of Pa., member of the Assoc. Amer. Goologiets, &c. &c. I I BURLINGTON; CHAUNCEY GOODRICH. -I S46. I S p :. To His Excellencij WILLIA1I SLADE, Governor of Vermont: Siit, I herewith submit the second report on the Geology of Vermont, and have the honor to remain, your Excellency's obedient servant, C. B. ADAms, State Geologist. Middlebury, Oct. 1, 1846. I CONTENTS. List of engravings, Index of towns and counties, Errata, INTRODUCTION. history of the Survey from Oct. 1845, to Oct. 1846, PART I. ELEMENTARY GEOLOGY. Design of this part, Jo Crr. I. GEOLOGICAL AGENCIES. Intensity of geological agencies, 20 Classification of " " 21 Igneous agencies, . 21 Subaerial agency, . 22 Volcanoes, . 22 Eruptions, . 22 Static pressure in volcanoes, 29 Character of lava, 29 Earthquakes, . 30 Thermal springs, 31 Submarine igneous agency, 32 Volcanic islands, 32 Subterranean igneous agency, 32 Theory of geysers and of volcanoes, 33 Theory of internal heat, 37 Aqueous agencies, . 38 Aqueous agencies not marine, 39 Rain ; frost, . 39 Rivers, . 40 Landslides; glaciers, Springs, . 44 2 3 Primary strata, . . . . . . . 104 Oceanic agencies, . . 45 Duration of genera, . . . . . . 105 Waves, . . . Oceanic currents, 47 Connection of geology with the bible, .
    [Show full text]