Zone 3 TAPAS Action Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zone 3 TAPAS Action Plan North Sydney Council Traffic & Parking Area Scheme & Action Plan TAPAS Zone 3 DOCUMENT CONTROL North Sydney Council Traffic and Parking Area Schemes (TAPAS) Action Plans Title Draft Report Prepared for North Sydney Council Project Ref TBC Name Position Signed/Approved Date 24/02/2017 Senior Traffic Federico Ramos Engineer Originators 9/6/2017 North Sydney Michaela Kemp 27/7/2017 Council 7/11/2017 Associate Reviewer Andrew Brown 21/03/2017 Transport Planner Project Approver Colin Henson Development and Planning Manager Details of Revisions Rev Date Description WVR No. Approved 1 21/03/2017 Draft Report 24/02/2017 2 9/06/2017 Draft Report 3 27/07/2017 Draft Report (minor corrections) 4 7/11/2017 Final Report CONTACT DETAILS SMEC Australia Pty Ltd | www.smec.com Level 5, 20 Berry Street North Sydney NSW 2060 Tel: 02 9925 5555 Fax: 02 9925 5566 Representative: Federico Ramos P: 02 9925 5533 E: [email protected] SMEC | North Sydney Council TAPAS Zone 3 Action Plans Draft Report | Page i www.smec.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Community Strategic Plan ................................................................................. 5 1.3 Study Objectives ................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Data Collection and Review ............................................................................... 6 1.5 Community Engagement Feedback ................................................................... 7 1.6 Literature Review ............................................................................................... 7 1.7 Strategic Planning Context ................................................................................ 7 1.7.1 Disability Discrimination Act, 1992 ...................................................................... 7 1.7.2 Commonwealth Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport .................... 8 1.7.3 NSW Long Term Transport Master Plan .............................................................. 8 1.7.4 Transport for NSW – Sydney’s Walking Future .................................................... 9 1.7.5 Transport NSW Disability Action Plan 2012-2017 ................................................. 9 1.7.6 NSW Road Safety Strategy .............................................................................. 10 1.7.7 NSW Walking Strategy ..................................................................................... 10 1.7.8 NSW Ageing Strategy 2020 .............................................................................. 10 1.8 Local Planning Context .................................................................................... 10 1.8.1 North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013 ................................................... 11 1.8.2 North Sydney Development Control Plan 2013 .................................................. 11 1.8.3 North Sydney Integrated Traffic and Parking Strategy ........................................ 12 1.8.4 North Sydney Integrated Cycling Strategy ......................................................... 13 1.8.5 Draft North Sydney Transport Strategy .............................................................. 14 2. STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................ 16 2.1 Characteristics of Study Area .......................................................................... 16 2.2 Functional Road Hierarchy .............................................................................. 16 2.2.1 Administrative Road Hierarchy.......................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Functional Road Hierarchy ............................................................................... 16 2.3 Journey to Work Data (JTW) and Commuter Mode Share ................................ 17 2.3.1 Household vehicle ownership ........................................................................... 18 2.3.2 BTS Travel Zone System in the Core Study Area ............................................... 18 2.3.3 Population and Land Uses................................................................................ 19 2.3.4 Commuter Transport Mode Share ..................................................................... 20 2.4 Local Area Traffic Management Devices .......................................................... 22 2.5 Parking Facilities ............................................................................................. 22 2.5.1 Current Management Framework...................................................................... 22 2.5.2 On-street Parking Control Typologies ................................................................ 22 2.5.3 Current Permit Parking Scheme Operations ...................................................... 22 2.5.4 Restricted Parking Controls Operations ............................................................. 23 2.5.5 Mobility Parking Operations .............................................................................. 23 2.5.6 School Related Parking Control Operations ....................................................... 23 2.5.7 Car Share Operations ...................................................................................... 23 SMEC | North Sydney Council TAPAS Zone 3 Action Plans Draft Report | Page ii 2.5.8 Metered Parking Operations............................................................................. 23 2.6 Walking and Cycling Facilities......................................................................... 23 2.6.1 Walking Facilities ............................................................................................ 23 2.6.2 Cycling Facilities ............................................................................................. 24 2.7 Public Transport Facilities ............................................................................... 26 2.7.1 Bus Services ................................................................................................... 26 2.7.2 Rail & Ferry Services ....................................................................................... 27 2.8 Crash Data Analysis ........................................................................................ 28 3. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS................................................................................... 5 3.1 Sydney Metro..................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Crows Nest Station............................................................................................ 5 3.1.2 Victoria Cross Station ........................................................................................ 6 3.2 Traffic Impact Assessment of Ongoing Development ....................................... 6 3.2.1 Cumulative Traffic Generation Assessment ......................................................... 6 4. EXISTING TRANSPORT ISSUES IDENTIFIED THROUGH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 8 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Transport for NSW ............................................................................................. 8 4.3 Roads and Maritime Services ............................................................................ 9 4.4 Cycling Strategy ................................................................................................ 9 4.5 Matters Referred to Other Council Departments.............................................. 10 5. TAPAS ACTIONS PLANS ........................................................................................... 11 5.1 Action Plan Development ................................................................................ 11 5.1.1 Existing Conditions (Problem Score)................................................................. 11 5.1.2 Community Strategic Plan Criteria .................................................................... 11 5.1.3 Total Project Score .......................................................................................... 12 5.2 Parking Review ................................................................................................ 13 5.3 TAPAS Act ions – Parking ................................................................................ 13 6. APPROVALS PROCESSES ........................................................................................ 15 APPENDIX A – PRIORITISED ACTION PLAN ..................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B – ITEMS REFERRED TO TRANSPORT FOR NSW ......................................... 17 APPENDIX C – ITEMS REFERRED TO ROADS AND MARITIME SERVICES........................ 18 APPENDIX D – ITEMS REFERRED TO OTHER COUNCIL DEPARTMENTS ......................... 19 APPENDIX E – ITEMS NOTED AS PART OF THIS STUDY .................................................. 20 APPENDIX F – ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND SCORING METHODOLOGY ....................... 21 SMEC | North Sydney Council TAPAS Zone 3 Action Plans Draft Report | Page iii List of Figures Figure 1: TAPAS Action Plan Study Area .................................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • History Walk
    History Walk HENRY LAWSON’S already a highly urbanised nation by the time the colonies Federated in 1901. The ‘Legend of the NORTH SYDNEY Bush’ had great resonance in the city. A walking tour from McMahons And yet Lawson, too, spent much of his time in Point to Balls Head Sydney – and North Sydney. He lived in numerous dwellings between 1885, when he Distance: Approx. 3 Km stayed with Mrs Emma Brooks in East Crescent Approximate time: 2.5 hours Street, and 1920. You will pass by some of his Grading: High (there are residences on this walk. Other dwellings and several sets of places of significance include: Strathmere, Lord steep inclines and Street in 1899; rooms above the Coffee Palace stairs to negotiate) in Miller Street run by Mrs Isabel Byers who would care for Lawson for many years after this; Chaplin Cottage, Charles Street where Lawson’s second child Bertha was born in 1900; and Dind’s Hotel at the bottom of Alfred Street Milsons Point – the subject of the very funny poem ‘Dinds Hotel’ – … We hurried out of Campbell Street, and round to Dind’s hotel Where after two long beers apiece, we found the world “orright”… Curiously while Australia’s rural landscape was being well-interpreted and mythologised in poetry and prose, the communities around Sydney’s by-then famous Harbour were rarely explored in writing. Lawson’s portraits of life near Henry Lawson, c.1910. North Sydney Heritage the North Sydney waterfront are among the most Centre Collection/ Stanton Library, PF592/6 intimate and rare portrayals of ‘harbour people’ written.
    [Show full text]
  • Campbell Housing Apartments)
    Australian Capital Territory Heritage (Decision about Registration for Campbell Housing Apartments). Notice 2011 Notifiable Instrument NI 2011 - 742 made under the Heritage Act 2004 section 42 Notice of Decision about Registration 1. Revocation This instrument replaces NI 2011 – 489 2. Name of instrument This instrument is the Heritage (Decision about Registration for Campbell Housing Apartments) Notice 2011 - 3. Registration details of the place Registration details of the place are at Attachment A: Register entry for Campbell Housing Apartments . 4. Reason for decision The ACT Heritage Council has decided that the Campbell Housing Apartments meets one or more of the heritage significance criteria at s 10 of the Heritage Act 2004. The register entry is at Attachment A. 5. Date of Registration 1 December 2011 Gerhard Zatschler Secretary ACT Heritage Council 1 December 2011 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY HERITAGE REGISTER (Registration Details) Place No: For the purposes of s. 41 of the Heritage Act 2004, an entry to the heritage register has been prepared by the ACT Heritage Council for the following place: Campbell Housing Apartments, 6 & 8 Edmondson Street Campbell (Part) Block 15 Section 9 Campbell DATE OF REGISTRATION Notified: 1 December 2011 Notifiable Instrument: 2011/ Copies of the Register Entry are available for inspection at the ACT Heritage Unit. For further information please contact: The Secretary ACT Heritage Council GPO Box 158, Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: 13 22 81 Facsimile: (02) 6207 2229 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PLACE Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au Campbell Housing Apartments (Blamey Heights), 6 and 8 Edmondson Street, Campbell (Part) Block 15, Section 9, Campbell, Canberra Central STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE This statement refers to the Heritage Significance of the place as required in s12(d) of the Heritage Act 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand Vol. 32
    Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand Vol. 32 Edited by Paul Hogben and Judith O’Callaghan Published in Sydney, Australia, by SAHANZ, 2015 ISBN: 978 0 646 94298 8 The bibliographic citation for this paper is: Margalit, Harry, and Paola Favaro. “From Social Role to Urban Significance: The Changing Presence of the MLC Company in Martin Place.” In Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand: 32, Architecture, Institutions and Change, edited by Paul Hogben and Judith O’Callaghan, 378- 389. Sydney: SAHANZ, 2015. All efforts have been undertaken to ensure that authors have secured appropriate permissions to reproduce the images illustrating individual contributions. Interested parties may contact the editors. Harry Margalit and Paola Favaro, UNSW Australia From Social Role to Urban Significance: The Changing Presence of the MLC Company in Martin Place The intersection of Martin Place and Castlereagh Street in Sydney is dominated by a single institution – the MLC (Mutual Life and Citizens’ Assurance Company). To the south is the MLC Centre (1971-77), and on the northern corner stands the interwar MLC building of 1938. The company has a long association with the area, with the Citizens’ Life Assurance Company established in 1886 and headquartered at 21-25 Castlereagh Street. The MLC Company came into being in 1908 with the amalgamation of the Citizens’ Life Assurance Co. Limited and the Mutual Life Assurance Association of Australia. This paper examines the history of the 1938 and 1977 buildings as a means to understanding and elucidating not only the development of the company, but also changing attitudes to how it represented itself through specific buildings, and how the function and public presence of each building chart a shift in urban design attitudes and the use of public space.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Dick Dusseldorp and Lend Lease Lindie Clark Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-03994-9 - Finding a Common Interest: The Story of Dick Dusseldorp and Lend Lease Lindie Clark Index More information Index Academy of Sciences building, design and construction, 42–4, Canberra, 6, 30, 32, 185 46–50, 125–6 Actors Equity, 159 project control system, 48, 51 ACTU–Lend Lease Foundation, 127–9, public plaza, 6, 43, 46–7, 125, 159, 208, 258 n.67 238 n.133 actuaries, 140–2, 147 Tower building, 43–4, 48–50, 126, Adelaide Steamship company, 153 237 n.98 Advanced Management Program, Australia Square Training Company, Harvard Business School, 35–7, 80 129 agents, insurance, 144–5, 261–2 n.74 Australian Chamber of Commerce and Allen, Milton, 38, 84, 222 Industry, 113, 114 MLC, 131–3, 136–7, 139, 153, 154, Australian Council of Trade Unions 258 nn.5, 9, 260 n.39 (ACTU), 53, 76, 116, 128, 239 n.3, alliance contracting, 233 n.13 255 n.21 Alpine Way, 197, 201, 203, 273 n.72, Australian Gas Light Company, 179 275 n.124 Australian Institute of Management, 61 AMP, see Australian Mutual Provident Australian Labor Party, 53 Society Australian Mutual Provident Society Anderson, Jim, 140–1 (AMP), 42, 56, 82, 132, 139, 145, annual general meetings, 120–1, 124, 246 n.5, 247 nn.19, 20 226 Australian Student Traineeship Anton, Charles, 273 n.72 Foundation (ASTF), 213 Appletree Hill Estate, 184–7, 193, 196, Australian Ugliness, The, 182, 183, 270 nn.28, 29 184 apprentices, 71, 127–9, 208, 212; see also skills formation; training Baalman, John, 179–80 programs Bank of New South Wales (Westpac), Arbitration Commission,
    [Show full text]
  • Harry Seidler: Modernist Press Kit Page 1
    Harry Seidler: Modernist Press Kit Page 1 press kit Original Title: HARRY SEIDLER MODERNIST Year of Production: 2016 Director: DARYL DELLORA Producers: CHARLOTTE SEYMOUR & SUE MASLIN Writers: DARYL DELLORA with IAN WANSBROUGH Narrator: MARTA DUSSELDORP Duration: 58 MINS Genre: DOCUMENTARY Original Language: ENGLISH Country of Origin: AUSTRALIA Screening Format: HD PRO RES & BLU-RAY Original Format: HD Picture: COLOUR & B&W Production Company: FILM ART DOCO World Sales: FILM ART MEDIA Principal Investors: ABC TV, SCREEN AUSTRALIA, FILM VICTORIA, SCREEN NSW & FILM ART MEDIA Harry Seidler: Modernist Press Kit Page 2 SYNOPSES One line synopsis An insightful retrospective of Harry Seidler’s architectural vision One paragraph synopsis Harry Seidler: Modernist is a retrospective celebration of the life and work of Australia's most controversial architect. Sixty years of work is showcased through sumptuous photography and interviews with leading architects from around the world. Long synopsis At the time of his death in 2006, Harry Seidler was Australia's best-known architect. The Sydney Morning Herald carried a banner headline "HOW HE DEFINED SYDNEY" and there were obituaries in the London and the New York Times. Lord Richard Rogers, of Paris Pompidou Center fame, describes him as one of the world's great mainstream modernists. This film charts the life and career of Harry Seidler through the eyes of those that knew him best; his wife of almost fifty years Penelope Seidler; his co-workers including Colin Griffiths and Peter Hirst who were by his side over four decades; and several well-placed architectural commentators and experts including three laureates of the highest honour the world architectural community bestows, the Pritzker Prize: Lord Norman Foster, Lord Richard Rogers and our own Glenn Murcutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Harry Seidler AC OBE
    Mr Harry Seidler AC OBE The degree of Doctor of Science in Architecture (honoris causa) was conferred upon Harry Seidler at the Architecture ceremony held on 6 April 2000. Citation Chancellor I have the honour to present to you Harry Seidler for admission to the degree of Doctor of Science in Architecture, honoris causa. Harry Seidler was born in Vienna in 1923 and migrated to Britain when Austria was invaded shortly before the Second World War. In 1939, he was sent with other Germans and Austrians to Canada where he was admitted to study Architecture at the University of Manitoba. He graduated in 1944 and was accepted by the Harvard Graduate School of Design to do post-graduate work with Walter Gropius and Marcel Breuer. Later he spent some time with the painter Joseph Albers at Black Mountain College, North Carolina, and subsequently worked with Breuer in New York. He was also, for a brief time, with Oscar Niemeyer in Rio. In 1948, he came to Sydney, and in 1951, won the Sir John Sulman Medal for the first house he built in Australia, the Rose Seidler House at Turramurra. Seidler was exceptionally fortunate in his outstanding teachers, and his youthful international experience. Both influences made him sensitive to cultural differences, and throughout his career as an international architect, his buildings have acknowledged these. In his early years in Sydney, domestic architecture was his main preoccupation. He built houses and high rise apartment blocks in many Sydney suburbs, all of which are recognizable by their strong structural features. In 1960, Seidler began to work with the Italian engineer Pier Luigi Nervi, on the cylindrical tower for Australia Square.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER AIA Register of Significant Architecture February2021.Xls AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE of ARCHITECTS REGISTER of SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS in NSW MASTER
    AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REGISTER OF SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS IN NSW MASTER O A & K HENDERSON / LOUIS A & K HENDERSON OF MELBOURNE, 1935 1940 1991, 1993, T&G Building 555 Dean Street Albury Albury City 4703473Card HENDERSON rear by LOUIS HARRISON 1994, 2006, 2008 H Graeme Gunn Graeme Gunn 1968-69 Baronda (Yencken House) Nelson Lake Road, Nelson Lagoon Mimosa Rocks Bega Valley 4703519 No Card National Park H Roy Grounds Roy Grounds 1964 1980 Penders Haighes Road Mimosa Rocks Bega Valley 4703518 Digital National Park Listing Card CH [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1937 Star of the Sea Catholic 19 Bega Street Tathra Bega Valley 4702325 Card Church G [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1860 1862 Extended 2004 Tathra Wharf & Building Wharf Road Tathra Bega Valley 4702326 Card not located H [architect not identified] [architect not identified] undated Residence Bega Road Wolumla Bega Valley 4702327 Card SC NSW Government Architect NSW Government Architect undated Public School and Residence Bega Road Wolumla Bega Valley 4702328 Card TH [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1911 Bellingen Council Chambers Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701129 Card P [architect not identified] [architect not identified] 1910 Federal Hotel 77 Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701131 Card I G. E. MOORE G. E. MOORE 1912 Former Masonic Hall 121 Hyde Street Bellingen Bellingen 4701268 Card H [architect not identified] [architect not identified] circa 1905 Residence 4 Coronation Street Bellingen Bellingen
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nsw Harry Seidler Unsw Talk 2 Form Relations in Baroque And
    UNIVERSITY OF NSW HARRY SEIDLER UNSW TALK 2 FORM RELATIONS IN BAROQUE AND MODERN ARCHITECTURE 17-4-1980 INTRODUCTION [0.00] Sydney architect, Harry Seidler, was appointed visiting professor in architecture at the University of New South Wales for the first semester of 1980. He was born in Vienna in 1923. After studies in England he graduated from the University of Manitoba in Canada. Later, he did post graduate work at Harvard University under the founder of the Bauhaus, Walter Gropius, and studied design under the painter, Josef Albers. In 1948 Seidler started to practice in Sydney and the many buildings he has completed since then have earned him an international reputation. Amongst his best known buildings is Sydney’s Blues Point Tower, Australia Square and the MLC Centre and Canberra’s Trade Group offices. A recent overseas work is the Australian Embassy in Paris. This lecture is the first of two lectures which deal with baroque architecture and the parallels and form relations that exist between baroque and modern architecture. To suggest that there could be any relation at all between what we generally refer to as modern architecture and the baroque period would have been considered almost preposterous until recently. Most people would have agreed that those two things are just so far apart that any relation between them would be quite irreconcilable. Now, modern architecture has now reached a level at which it can afford almost greater concern with historical continuity and there’s generally a greater willingness to look again at periods of history and find not only evidence of historical continuity which is beginning to be more and more important to those concerned with the development of architecture but to also find in certain respects a new appreciation and particularly for periods that have to their credit such amazing achievements as the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Blues Point Acoustic Shed Modification Report
    City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Blues Point acoustic shed modification report August 2018 Sydney Metro Blues Point acoustic shed Modification Report Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of the proposed modification ............................................................................................... 2 Need and justification ............................................................................................................................ 2 Community consultation ....................................................................................................................... 2 Environmental assessment ................................................................................................................... 2 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Purpose of this report ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Postwar Jewish Migration and Sydney’s Cityscape Suzanne D. Rutland Introduction It has been said that the Jews are the most urban and cosmopolitan of people, and this is certainly true of Jewish Australia. Whilst in the nineteenth century 40% of Australia’s Jewish population resided outside the main urban centres, by the second half of the twentieth century the community was centred in the largest cities, with 50% living in Melbourne, 40% in Sydney, and the remainder in the smaller capital cities of Perth, Brisbane and Adelaide. The majority of this population was first or second generation, having arrived either immediately before or after World II, when the two waves of Jewish immigrants reinforced Australia’s small Jewish population of only 23,000 in 1933 by a further 37,000 refugees and Holocaust survivors from Europe so that in 1961 there were 61,000 Jews in Australia. The period between 1938 and 1961 saw Sydney’s Jewish population more than double as a result of European Jewish migration. In 1966 well-known theatre director, Gordon Hayes, summed up their impact: It would seem that Australia has much to be thankful for in the dislocation of people as a result of Hitler’s war. While it was undoubtedly painful perhaps beyond measure to witness great cultures burnt with their books, yet so many Europeans were able somehow to salvage a measure of this cultural wealth, and bring it with them to their new home on this vast Pacific island. They came at a time when Australia was crying out to find itself.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nsw Harry Seidler Unsw Talk 5 Habitat
    UNIVERSITY OF NSW HARRY SEIDLER UNSW TALK 5 HABITAT, ITS DETAIL AND TOTALITY 8 May1980 INTRODUCTION [0.00] Sydney architect, Harry Seidler, was appointed visiting professor in architecture at the University of New South Wales for the first semester of 1980. He was born in Vienna in 1923. After studies in England he graduated from the University of Manitoba in Canada. Later, he did post graduate work at Harvard University under the founder of the Bauhaus, Walter Gropius, and studied design under the painter, Josef Albers. In 1948 Seidler started to practice in Sydney and the many buildings he has completed since then have earned him an international reputation. Amongst his best known buildings is Sydney’s Blues Point Tower, Australia Square and the MLC Centre and Canberra’s Trade Group offices. A recent overseas work is the Australian Embassy in Paris. This lecture deals with Seidler’s extensive experience in designing housing, involving not only the detailed architectural aspects but also town planning issues. Australia has, to its credit, some fine examples of domestic architecture but largely those that date back almost a hundred years. At that time, in our colonial period, we find architecture built for people to live full of imagination, full of ingenuity and even taste. Now, much of this continued throughout the nineteenth century but unfortunately today I don’t think one can claim this to still be so. Domestic architecture in the twentieth century or through most of it is, I’m afraid, painfully provincial here. Now, there are, of course, great movements of new architecture that have taken place in other western countries and what we hear of them on this side of the world is little more than a faint echo and it probably is not surprising that due to our geographic isolation that things tend to remain either misunderstood or interpreted in such a way as to yield results that by and large must be termed “provincial”, they miss the essentials, they miss the real point.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Development Structures and Systems in Australia
    The State of Contemporary Property Development Structures and Systems in Australia Dr Jonathan Drane Western Sydney University, Sydney Graduate School of Management Today : How Did We Get Here? Introduction: The Drowned Building and other tragedies A Little History of The Property Development System In The Beginning: The Erosion of Architectural Practice The Rise of the Private Property Developer The Advent of Project Management & D&C Emergence of The Private Certifier Lessons from the Drowned Building A Good Case Example: Gateway Apartment Tower Townsville A Way Forward- A Defects Detection Matrix http://www.jondrane.net/research/the- state-of-contemporary-property- School of Business development-structures/ Introduction: The Drowned Building The apartment block was nearly a decade old and looked like a drowned beast, Every apartment owner was demoralised and in a state of resignation. The building had rooms which were mould-effected from continuous leaking and damp intrusion. http://www.jondrane.net/research/the- state-of-contemporary-property- School of Business development-structures/ Introduction: The Drowned Building The roof was very low quality, gutters were installed back the front, Planters sat on balconies that leaked into apartments below. Precast panels were not joined properly and allowed water to flow in. The car park had flooded several times. http://www.jondrane.net/research/the- state-of-contemporary-property- School of Business development-structures/ From Defect to Tragedy Tower Tragedies National Bankstown Fire 2012 The Bankstown incident involved a fire in a multi-apartment tower which saw two young women jump from the fifth floor to escape the intense fire and flames.
    [Show full text]