Creating Home in Urban Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Creating Home in Urban Australia CREATING HOME IN URBAN AUSTRALIA THE ROLE OF SITE, SPACE AND FORM By Jillian W alliss ( B. L. Arch. ) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Design University of Tasmania ( May 1996 ) This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University of Tasmania or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the Candidate's knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of the thesis. This thesis may be made available for loan. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act of 1968. ABSTRACT Environmental concerns, together with increasing development costs have created the need for urban housing which can provide an alternative to the popular, but low density detached house. Coaxing Australians into denser housing, however, is proving a difficult task, particularly as many regard the detached house as the ideal home. The concept of home is extremely complex, incorporating many physical, social and psychological factors. However, attempting to understand and incorporate these attributes into the development of denser housing will surely produce a greater acceptance of urban housing in Australian cities. This approach must be preferable to simply insisting that Australians modify their lifestyles and values in order to accept urban housing. This thesis will explore one important component of housing design - spatial organisation, in order to establish its role and importance in creating home in Australia. Spatial organisation describes the method of arranging dwellings, external spaces and associated facilities on a site. It forms a particularly important consideration in the design of urban housing where it is often necessary to design a number of individual dwellings and functions on a common block of land. This research is therefore not concerned with the internal spatial arrangement of the dwelling, instead focusing on the relationship, both physically and socially, between the individual dwelling and the broader community and urban fabric. The major component of this research traces the historical development of spatial organisation in Australian housing. This occurred in two distinct phases involving: a) the modification of English cultural models; and b) the post World War II application of Modernist housing principles. These two phases were characterised by contrasting spatial organisations which produced very different concepts of home. The traditional model, for example, favoured individual and private homes whereas the Modernist models emphasised mass housing developments with communal facilities. Evaluation of these models reveal that many Australians have a clear preference for the domestic qualities produced by the traditional spatial organisation while contemporary housing design still incorporates many aspects of Modernist spatial organisation. This thesis examines this paradox from a number of perspectives and concludes with a new direction for spatial organisation in urban housing, based on an Australian perception of horne. In addition, it demonstrates the value of multi-disciplinary research in the development of contemporary design theory, which balances the needs of the broader population against the inclinations of the design profession. 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks are due to the Department of Urban Design, University of Tasmania, particularly to my supervisor Barrie Shelton and also to Damien Mugavin and Prue Slatyer. I would like to thank the Technical Policy Unit of the N.S.W. Department of Housing. Particular gratitude is owed to John Gregory and Mora Main for their continual support, insight and knowledge, much of which has inspired and guided this research. Finally, I would like to give a special thanks to Angela Lober, Justin McCormick, Tun Leach, Alan Bright, Walter Carniato, Karen Kennedy and Jude Abel who together have offered much humour and a little direction during some tedious moments of this research. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Vl LIST OF TABLES........................................................................... Vlll INTRODUCTION........................................................................... 1 CHAPTER I THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUSTRALIAN HOUSING.. 6 EARLY DEVELOPMENT . 7 THE SUBURBS . 11 FLAT ANDAPARTMENTBUILDINGS............................... 14 Millers Point . 15 The Strickland Apartments . 16 QUALITIES OF AUSTRALIAN HOUSING........................... 18 CHAPTER IT MODERNISM AND HOUSING.................................. 23 EARLY UTOPIAN IDEAS......................................................... 24 Robert Owen........... 26 Tony Garnier . 27 INFLUENTIAL MODERNIST CONCEPTS . 29 NEO-RADBURN .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 31 The Original Radburn. 31 The Emergence of a Neo-Radburn.............................. 33 HIGH RISE IN PARKLAND............................................. 38 The Slab Block.................................................... 38 The Point Block................................................... 41 The Work of Le Corbusier...... 43 LOW RISE URBAN........................................................ 44 Pedestrian Streets . 44 Patio and Courtyard Housing.................................... 45 CHAPTER ill MODERNISM AND AUSTRALIAN HOUSING........... 51 POST WAR RECONSTRUCTION .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 52 Commonwealth Housing Commission......................... 53 Walter Bunning.................................................... 58 THE EMERGENCE OF MODERNISM.......................................... 61 111 Page NEG-RADBURN........................................................... 61 Cartwright.. 62 The Village . 66 HIGH RISE IN PARKLAND............................................. 68 The North Melbourne Estate . 69 LOW RISE URBAN........................................................ 71 Woolloomooloo . 71 Villa wood . 78 THE PRIVATE SECTOR.................................................. 81 Swinger Hill . 82 Winter Park . 82 Blue Point Towers................................................. 83 CHAPTER IV EVALUATION OF MODERNIST SPATIAL CONCEPTS 89 POST-OCCUPANCYEVALUATIONS................................. 90 Neo-Radbum . .. .. .. .. .. .. 91 High Rise in Parkland . 92 Low Rise Urban..................................................... 95 The Private Sector........... 97 STUDIES OF TRADITIONAL DOMESTIC SPACE.................. 99 The Front Yard . 99 The Back Yard..................................................... 100 SOCIAL RESEARCH AND THE MEANING OF HOME............ 101 The Immigrant . 101 The Indigenous View . 102 The Overview... 103 BEHAVIOURAL CONVENTIONS...................................... 104 Terntonality............. 104 Privacy............................................................... 105 Boundaries and Transitional Spaces............................. 106 FAILINGS OF MODERNIST SPATIAL THEORY................... 107 The Role of Spatial Organisation . 109 CHAPTER V SPATIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR AUSTRALIAN. 112 HOUSING Principle 1 . 114 Principle 2............ 119 Principle 3........................................................... 125 Principle 4. 128 Principle 5........................................................... 136 lV Page CONCLUSION .............................................................................. 140 APPENDIXES ............................................................................... 144 APPENDIX A: The Spatial Rehabilitation ofVillawood ............... 144 APPENDIX B: StClair, Model Urban Housing Program ............. 146 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................................................... 148 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. 1888 map of the inner Sydney suburb of Glebe.................................. 10 2. The model suburb ofHaberfield ...... ... .. .. .. .... ...... ... ........ ... .. .. .. .. 12 3. The Strickland Apartments........................................................... 17 4. Consistent spatial organisation of Australian housing..... 19 5. Traditional spatial organisation of Australian housing............................ 21 6. Evolution of the New York tenement............................................... 25 7. Owen's plan for Villages of Unity and Co-operation........................... 26 8. Plan of the residential quarter for Une Cite Industrielle.......................... 28 9. Perspective of the residential quarter, Une Cite Industrielle..................... 28 10. Plan of the residential districts for Radburn, New Jersey, 1929................ 34 11. Spatial organisation of a typical Radburn cul-de-sac............................. 35 12. Jorn Utzon's Kingo houses, 1958, Neo-Radburn.... .. .. .... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. 37 13. Studies by Walter Gropius of building height, density and sunlight........... 39 14. Principles for siting residential blocks, 1953...................................... 40 15. The Williamsburg Houses, 1937, High Rise in Parkland....................... 42 16. Danviksklippan, Stockholm, 1940s, High Rise in Parkland.................... 42 17 The 'Town House' project, London, 1955-6, Low Rise Urban................ 46 18. Tuggeranong, ACT,
Recommended publications
  • History Walk
    History Walk HENRY LAWSON’S already a highly urbanised nation by the time the colonies Federated in 1901. The ‘Legend of the NORTH SYDNEY Bush’ had great resonance in the city. A walking tour from McMahons And yet Lawson, too, spent much of his time in Point to Balls Head Sydney – and North Sydney. He lived in numerous dwellings between 1885, when he Distance: Approx. 3 Km stayed with Mrs Emma Brooks in East Crescent Approximate time: 2.5 hours Street, and 1920. You will pass by some of his Grading: High (there are residences on this walk. Other dwellings and several sets of places of significance include: Strathmere, Lord steep inclines and Street in 1899; rooms above the Coffee Palace stairs to negotiate) in Miller Street run by Mrs Isabel Byers who would care for Lawson for many years after this; Chaplin Cottage, Charles Street where Lawson’s second child Bertha was born in 1900; and Dind’s Hotel at the bottom of Alfred Street Milsons Point – the subject of the very funny poem ‘Dinds Hotel’ – … We hurried out of Campbell Street, and round to Dind’s hotel Where after two long beers apiece, we found the world “orright”… Curiously while Australia’s rural landscape was being well-interpreted and mythologised in poetry and prose, the communities around Sydney’s by-then famous Harbour were rarely explored in writing. Lawson’s portraits of life near Henry Lawson, c.1910. North Sydney Heritage the North Sydney waterfront are among the most Centre Collection/ Stanton Library, PF592/6 intimate and rare portrayals of ‘harbour people’ written.
    [Show full text]
  • Great White Noise
    GREAT WHITE NOISE Mark Davis For my fourteenth birthday my parents gav e me a small paperback by someone called Hugh Stretton. I’d never heard of Hugh Stretton and the book looked very enigmatic and not very exciting. It was called Ideas for Australian Cities. I opened it to find, amid the text, some maps and alternative plans for parts of Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney and Adelaide. Now this was more exciting. At fourteen I was very inter- ested in the ways towns were set out, and I spent my spare time drawing alternative plans for all the towns we had ever lived in on large sheets of paper my parents smuggled home from the art department at the school where they worked. When I stopped looking at the pictures and began to read, I became even more excited. It hit me that Hugh Stretton wasn’t just an isolated indi- vidual who happened to be interested in Australian cities, but 183 © Mark Davis. Deposited to the University of Melbourne ePrints Repository with permission of Melbourne University Publishing.Unauthorised reproduced prohibited. was one of a group of people who thought and wrote about such things. I knew this because in the book he entered into debates and discussed other people’s ideas as well as his own. What’s more, they seemed to do it for a living. As a lower- middle-class kid who grew up in country towns, I figured that there were people who planned towns and designed bridges and made laws and thought up ideas, but I’d never met any of them.We knew no academics, lawyers, planners or engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Campbell Housing Apartments)
    Australian Capital Territory Heritage (Decision about Registration for Campbell Housing Apartments). Notice 2011 Notifiable Instrument NI 2011 - 742 made under the Heritage Act 2004 section 42 Notice of Decision about Registration 1. Revocation This instrument replaces NI 2011 – 489 2. Name of instrument This instrument is the Heritage (Decision about Registration for Campbell Housing Apartments) Notice 2011 - 3. Registration details of the place Registration details of the place are at Attachment A: Register entry for Campbell Housing Apartments . 4. Reason for decision The ACT Heritage Council has decided that the Campbell Housing Apartments meets one or more of the heritage significance criteria at s 10 of the Heritage Act 2004. The register entry is at Attachment A. 5. Date of Registration 1 December 2011 Gerhard Zatschler Secretary ACT Heritage Council 1 December 2011 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY HERITAGE REGISTER (Registration Details) Place No: For the purposes of s. 41 of the Heritage Act 2004, an entry to the heritage register has been prepared by the ACT Heritage Council for the following place: Campbell Housing Apartments, 6 & 8 Edmondson Street Campbell (Part) Block 15 Section 9 Campbell DATE OF REGISTRATION Notified: 1 December 2011 Notifiable Instrument: 2011/ Copies of the Register Entry are available for inspection at the ACT Heritage Unit. For further information please contact: The Secretary ACT Heritage Council GPO Box 158, Canberra, ACT 2601 Telephone: 13 22 81 Facsimile: (02) 6207 2229 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PLACE Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au Campbell Housing Apartments (Blamey Heights), 6 and 8 Edmondson Street, Campbell (Part) Block 15, Section 9, Campbell, Canberra Central STATEMENT OF HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE This statement refers to the Heritage Significance of the place as required in s12(d) of the Heritage Act 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • MSAA/LSAA Conf Proceedings
    LSAA 2000 AUCKLAND STRUCTURAL EXPRESSION INARCHITECTURE Harry Street Design Director at Creative Spaces Ltd Abstract A personal view of how structure can be employed to create exciting and memorable buildings. Commencing with the English 'Hi Tech' architects, the influence of Philip Cox and work at Creative Spaces the address will illustrate with the aid of slides how structural concepts, their expression and how they are detailed can generate a vibrant interesting architecture. Introduction Expressing the structure in buildings, making it evident how they stand up, has been a legitimate, although perhaps not always intentional, form of architectural expression since time immemorial. There can be no doubt about how the roof of the Parthenon on the acropolis was held up. This was probably not the designer's main motivation when considering the buildings aesthetics, nor indeed the primary motivation of many others over the centuries. Nevertheless the structure is there for us to appreciate in this and in many other examples. The English Experience My own understanding of this was slow in dawning, but following my formal training and during my O.E. Iwas attracted to the exciting architecture of the English architects of the 70's where structural expression was a key ingredient of the so-called "Hi Tech" aesthetic. The most memorable buildings of this period included: The Centre Pompidou where everything is expressed, nothing hidden, all in its right place and very ordered through the use of strong colour The Willis Faber Dumas building in Ipswich is a far less exuberant example of the style. Nevertheless the relatively conventional concrete structure of round columns and waffle slab is plainly evident.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel, Suburb, Cosmos
    The View from Above from Below: Novel, Suburb, Cosmos Brigid Rooney HROUGH CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES OF CAMERA AND FLIGHT, THE VIEW FROM ABOVE directs the opening chapter of The Australian Ugliness (1960), Melbourne- T based Robin Boyd’s famous critique of urban and suburban aesthetic forms. By 1960, such aerial vision was nothing new, but the arrival in 1956 of the Boeing jet meant air-travel was about to eclipse the sea voyage, conquering what Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey famously termed ‘the tyranny of distance’, and ushering in the era of mass tourism. This development naturalised and popularised an aesthetics of panorama that also organises the representation of suburbia. Boyd re-stages the aerial view successively. The visitor’s first approach to Australia is from the north. Moving from Darwin to Bourke, the visitor crosses over country ‘burnt brown and patchy, like a tender sunburnt skin, with sections of darker brown and blood red and blisters of lighter ochre’; his camera-eye view takes in the ‘red backland of Australia’ which ‘looks from the air satisfyingly like its own maps’ (Boyd 18). The arrival of Boyd’s hypothetical visitor, as noted, is staged twice, in the second instance tracking the plane’s approach ‘from across the Pacific’ over 1950s pre- Opera-House Sydney. From the long high view, urban Australia presents a vision of ‘continuity, unity and the promise of comfort in the mushroom roofs and the bright background of tended green’. Momentarily, suburban sprawl figures the ‘love of home’, with ‘great speckled carpets spread wide around every © Australian Humanities Review 60 (November 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • SOS – Sustaining Our Suburbs
    SOS – Sustaining our suburbs Authored by: Dr Louise Johnson School of Social and International Studies Deakin Univeristy [email protected] SOS – Sustaining our suburbs Johnson INTRODUCTION By 2030 Melbourne will be a city of 5 million. The 620 000 extra households will occupy the same area as today. If current trends continue and the Melbourne 2030 plan is realised, the city will have over 100 high density activity centres serving the needs of an older, single person and childless population living in apartments rather than houses. All this forms part of the State government’s objective of “Planning for Sustainable Growth”. But what does sustainability mean in this context and what are the assumptions which underpin the plan? This paper will locate Melbourne 2030 within a much longer and pervasive history of antipathy towards the particular suburban form which emerged at the end of the 19th century in Melbourne and Australia. It will argue that the artistic representations of suburban life and environments over the 20th century are now central to the national political and planning agenda. The transitional phase is the 1970s when artistic antagonism to the suburbs moved to sociological, economic and ecological fact. Politically the result was Gough Whitlam and DURD’s massive agenda for equalising social amenity in the suburbs. Since then the agenda to transform the suburbs has become one to create more compact, higher density cities as Better Cities joined Green Street, Vic Code, Res Code and now Melbourne 2030 to facilitate urban consolidation. After first considering this history of suburban representations, I will consider the veracity of arguments in favour of urban consolidation over suburban expansion, clarify what sustainability might mean in this context and then take a critical look at Melbourne 2030 Planning for Sustainable Growth as it relates to the eastern and western corridor of Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004-2005
    Annual Report 2004/2005 Governing partners Supported by Contents Report from the Chair of Trustees 4 Summary of Activities: “There is still much to be done” 6 Foundation Year in Review 10 Trustees’ Report 22 • Statement of Financial Performance 23 • Statement of Financial Position 24 • Statement of Cash Flows 25 • Notes to the Financial Statements 26 • Declaration by Trustees 35 • Independent Audit Report 36 Trustees, Board and Staff 38 Our supporters 40 The Annual Report Published March 2006 By the Don Dunstan Foundation Level 3, 10 Pulteney Street The University of Adelaide, SA 5005 http://www.dunstan.org.au ABN 71 448 549 600 Don Dunstan Foundation Annual Report 2004/2005 Page 2/40 Don Dunstan Foundation Values • Respect for fundamental human rights • Celebration of cultural and ethnic diversity • Freedom of individuals to control their lives • Just distribution of global wealth • Respect for indigenous people and protection of their rights • Democratic and inclusive forms of governance Strategic Directions • Facilitate a productive exchange between academic researchers and Government policy makers • Invigorate policy debate and responses • Consolidate and expand the Foundation’s links with the wider community • Support Chapter activities • Build and maintain the long-term viability of the Foundation Don Dunstan Foundation Annual Report 2004/2005 Page 3/40 REPORT FROM THE CHAIR The financial year 2004/2005 has been extremely productive with the Foundation continuing its drive to implement its Strategic Directions and Strategic Business Plan. The Foundation has provided an array of targeted events, pursued key projects of community benefit, enhanced its infrastructure and promoted its contribution to the wider South Australian Community.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand Vol. 32
    Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand Vol. 32 Edited by Paul Hogben and Judith O’Callaghan Published in Sydney, Australia, by SAHANZ, 2015 ISBN: 978 0 646 94298 8 The bibliographic citation for this paper is: Margalit, Harry, and Paola Favaro. “From Social Role to Urban Significance: The Changing Presence of the MLC Company in Martin Place.” In Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand: 32, Architecture, Institutions and Change, edited by Paul Hogben and Judith O’Callaghan, 378- 389. Sydney: SAHANZ, 2015. All efforts have been undertaken to ensure that authors have secured appropriate permissions to reproduce the images illustrating individual contributions. Interested parties may contact the editors. Harry Margalit and Paola Favaro, UNSW Australia From Social Role to Urban Significance: The Changing Presence of the MLC Company in Martin Place The intersection of Martin Place and Castlereagh Street in Sydney is dominated by a single institution – the MLC (Mutual Life and Citizens’ Assurance Company). To the south is the MLC Centre (1971-77), and on the northern corner stands the interwar MLC building of 1938. The company has a long association with the area, with the Citizens’ Life Assurance Company established in 1886 and headquartered at 21-25 Castlereagh Street. The MLC Company came into being in 1908 with the amalgamation of the Citizens’ Life Assurance Co. Limited and the Mutual Life Assurance Association of Australia. This paper examines the history of the 1938 and 1977 buildings as a means to understanding and elucidating not only the development of the company, but also changing attitudes to how it represented itself through specific buildings, and how the function and public presence of each building chart a shift in urban design attitudes and the use of public space.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Dick Dusseldorp and Lend Lease Lindie Clark Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-03994-9 - Finding a Common Interest: The Story of Dick Dusseldorp and Lend Lease Lindie Clark Index More information Index Academy of Sciences building, design and construction, 42–4, Canberra, 6, 30, 32, 185 46–50, 125–6 Actors Equity, 159 project control system, 48, 51 ACTU–Lend Lease Foundation, 127–9, public plaza, 6, 43, 46–7, 125, 159, 208, 258 n.67 238 n.133 actuaries, 140–2, 147 Tower building, 43–4, 48–50, 126, Adelaide Steamship company, 153 237 n.98 Advanced Management Program, Australia Square Training Company, Harvard Business School, 35–7, 80 129 agents, insurance, 144–5, 261–2 n.74 Australian Chamber of Commerce and Allen, Milton, 38, 84, 222 Industry, 113, 114 MLC, 131–3, 136–7, 139, 153, 154, Australian Council of Trade Unions 258 nn.5, 9, 260 n.39 (ACTU), 53, 76, 116, 128, 239 n.3, alliance contracting, 233 n.13 255 n.21 Alpine Way, 197, 201, 203, 273 n.72, Australian Gas Light Company, 179 275 n.124 Australian Institute of Management, 61 AMP, see Australian Mutual Provident Australian Labor Party, 53 Society Australian Mutual Provident Society Anderson, Jim, 140–1 (AMP), 42, 56, 82, 132, 139, 145, annual general meetings, 120–1, 124, 246 n.5, 247 nn.19, 20 226 Australian Student Traineeship Anton, Charles, 273 n.72 Foundation (ASTF), 213 Appletree Hill Estate, 184–7, 193, 196, Australian Ugliness, The, 182, 183, 270 nn.28, 29 184 apprentices, 71, 127–9, 208, 212; see also skills formation; training Baalman, John, 179–80 programs Bank of New South Wales (Westpac), Arbitration Commission,
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Book Review
    Interdisciplinary perspectives on cosmology & biological evolution Volume 10 Number 8 SJAEEI October 2000 A magazine of public affairs, the arts and theology One American survey of wannabe CoNTENTS professional economists at 4 COMMENT 24 graduate school With Morag Fraser, Peter Mares CHANGING IDENTITIES and John Ferguson. Robin Gerster in Taiwan. level showed that 8 26 just three per cent CAPITAL LETTER UN-DOING What is behind Australia's move away thought it 'very 9 from international treaties? important' to know LETTERS asks Moira Rayner. 10 27 anything about the THE MONTH'S TRAFFIC BUSH LAWYER way the ... economy With Peter Craven, June Factor and Nick Smith. 28 functioned. WE, THE PEOPLE 12 Anthony Ham on the unsatisfied stirrings -see our cover story, 'A N ew SUMMA THEOLOGIAE of democracy in the rogue states of Islam. Face of Economics', p18. 15 30 ARCHIMEDES SPRING INTO READING ; ;'J.~~ IIM~I"''b. J' With Peter Pierce, f~ 16 Jim Davidson, Andrew Hamilton, HOLDING THE KEYS Kate Llewellyn and Juliette Hughes. Mark Cully's cover story on Dan Madigan reports from Rome on Hugh Stretton has been assisted rallying youth, popes and sundry saints. 40 by the Commonwealth THEATRE Government through the Australia Council, its arts 17 Geoffrey Milne on The Importance of funding and advisory body. PLACING WOMEN Being Earnest and Peter Craven on Maryanne Confoy dissects the Australian Troilus and Cressida. bishops' response to research on the Cover design by Siobhan Jackson. participation of women in the church. 44 Photographs of Hugh Stretton (co ver and pl8) courtesy the author. FLASH IN THE PAN Cartoon p7 by Dean Moore.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradise Tram
    Kunapipi Volume 6 Issue 3 Article 3 1984 The paradise tram Bruce Clunies Ross Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Bruce Clunies, The paradise tram, Kunapipi, 6(3), 1984. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol6/iss3/3 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] The paradise tram Abstract The Paradise tram left from the Boer War monument outside the gates of Government House in Adelaide on the long route through the northeastern suburbs to the foot of Black Hill, where the River Torrens breaks out of its gorge in the Mount Lofty Ranges into the Adelaide Plain. At the terminus the maroon drop-centre trams changed tracks and waited by a stand of gum trees, through which the sun slanted across the blue-stone walls of an early settlement and the newer brick and sandstone facades of double- fronted bungalows with scalloped verandah walls, decorative renderings of stucco or pebble-dash and tapered columns inset with river stones. Among them were gaps for houses yet to be built, where smallholders continued market-gardening on the river silt. This was Paradise. This journal article is available in Kunapipi: https://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol6/iss3/3 BRUCE CLUNIES ROSS The Paradise Tram The Paradise tram left from the Boer War monument outside the gates of Government House in Adelaide on the long route through the north- eastern suburbs to the foot of Black Hill, where the River Torrens breaks out of its gorge in the Mount Lofty Ranges into the Adelaide Plain.
    [Show full text]
  • Harry Seidler: Modernist Press Kit Page 1
    Harry Seidler: Modernist Press Kit Page 1 press kit Original Title: HARRY SEIDLER MODERNIST Year of Production: 2016 Director: DARYL DELLORA Producers: CHARLOTTE SEYMOUR & SUE MASLIN Writers: DARYL DELLORA with IAN WANSBROUGH Narrator: MARTA DUSSELDORP Duration: 58 MINS Genre: DOCUMENTARY Original Language: ENGLISH Country of Origin: AUSTRALIA Screening Format: HD PRO RES & BLU-RAY Original Format: HD Picture: COLOUR & B&W Production Company: FILM ART DOCO World Sales: FILM ART MEDIA Principal Investors: ABC TV, SCREEN AUSTRALIA, FILM VICTORIA, SCREEN NSW & FILM ART MEDIA Harry Seidler: Modernist Press Kit Page 2 SYNOPSES One line synopsis An insightful retrospective of Harry Seidler’s architectural vision One paragraph synopsis Harry Seidler: Modernist is a retrospective celebration of the life and work of Australia's most controversial architect. Sixty years of work is showcased through sumptuous photography and interviews with leading architects from around the world. Long synopsis At the time of his death in 2006, Harry Seidler was Australia's best-known architect. The Sydney Morning Herald carried a banner headline "HOW HE DEFINED SYDNEY" and there were obituaries in the London and the New York Times. Lord Richard Rogers, of Paris Pompidou Center fame, describes him as one of the world's great mainstream modernists. This film charts the life and career of Harry Seidler through the eyes of those that knew him best; his wife of almost fifty years Penelope Seidler; his co-workers including Colin Griffiths and Peter Hirst who were by his side over four decades; and several well-placed architectural commentators and experts including three laureates of the highest honour the world architectural community bestows, the Pritzker Prize: Lord Norman Foster, Lord Richard Rogers and our own Glenn Murcutt.
    [Show full text]