Sherlock the Reichenbach Fall - Season 2, Episode 3 John Watson Sits in a Chair As the Rain Pours Down Outside the Window and Thunder Rumbles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sherlock the Reichenbach Fall - Season 2, Episode 3 John Watson Sits in a Chair As the Rain Pours Down Outside the Window and Thunder Rumbles Sherlock The Reichenbach Fall - Season 2, episode 3 John Watson sits in a chair as the rain pours down outside the window and thunder rumbles. He looks tired and his face is full of pain. ELLA (offscreen) Why today? (John frowns enquiringly. His therapist is sitting opposite him.) JOHN Do you want to hear me say it? ELLA Eighteen months since our last appointment. JOHN (his voice becoming quietly angry) Do you read the papers? ELLA Sometimes. JOHN Mmm, and you watch telly? You know why I’m here. (There’s a pained groan in his voice as he ends the sentence.) JOHN I’m here because… (His voice breaks and he can’t continue. He looks down, swallowing hard as he fights not to weep. Ella leans forward sympathetically.) ELLA What happened, John? (John closes his eyes, trying to get control of himself, then looks up at her again, his eyes full of loss. He clears his throat and breathes heavily.) JOHN (his voice breaking)Sher… (He can’t continue and he clears his throat again, swallowing hard.) ELLA (gently)You need to get it out. JOHN (softly, his voice full of pain and tears)My best friend…,Sherlock Holmes… (He sniffs, forcing his voice through the anguish.) JOHN …is dead. (He breaks and begins to cry.) Opening Credits. THREE MONTHS EARLIER. In an art gallery, the Director of the gallery is finishing his speech as he stands near a painting. GALLERY DIRECTOR Falls of the Reichenbach, Turner’s masterpiece, thankfully recovered owing to the prodigious talent of Mr. Sherlock Holmes. (The patrons applaud. Sherlock and John are standing nearby. The Director gives a small gift-wrapped box to Sherlock.) DIRECTOR A small token of our gratitude. (Sherlock takes the box and looks at it.) SHERLOCK Diamond cufflinks. All my cuffs have buttons. JOHN (to the Director) He means thank you. SHERLOCK Do I? JOHN Just say it. SHERLOCK (insincerely to the Director) Thank you. (He starts to walk away but John holds him back.) JOHN Hey. (Sherlock stops unwillingly as the press start taking photographs. Later, one of the photographs appears in a newspaper article headed “Hero of the Reichenbach”. The straplines read “Turner masterpiece recovered by ‘amateur’ ; “Scotland Yard embarrased [sic] by overlooked clues”. The text of the article reads “A Turner masterpiece worth £1.7million that was stolen from an auction house ten days ago has been recovered by an amateur detective from North London. Sherlock Holmes of Baker Street has been investigating the art crime simply as a hobby, and yet he was able to follow the trail that lead [sic] him to the famous work – a trail that Scotland Yard missed completely. Sherlock Holmes has gained cult following following the publication of his website – The Sci-…” at which point the text disappears offscreen. ) (A new newspaper article reads ”Top Banker Kidnapped” and the text reads ”Sherlock Holmes was last night being hailed a hero yet again for masterminding the daring escape of the kidnapped man. // Scotland Yard had to secretly bring in their special weapon (in the form of Mr Holmes) yet again. The case has drawn a huge amount of attention as the nation became divided about the outcome of the kidnapping. Bankers are certainly not the nations [sic] sweethearts any more, but Mr. Holmes certainly seems to be. As huge crowds gathered for the press conference, Mr Holmes was presented with a gift from...” and then the text disappears offscreen. Outside the banker’s house, the rescued man is standing with his arms around his wife and young son as the press film and photograph them while Sherlock and John stand uncomfortably nearby.) FATHER Back together with my family after my terrifying ordeal; and we have one person to thank for my deliverance – Sherlock Holmes. (As the public applaud, the boy smiles and offers a small gift-wrapped box to Sherlock. He takes it and rattles it briefly.) SHERLOCK (to John) Tie pin. I don’t wear ties. JOHN Shh. (A photograph of the scene appears in the next edition of the newspaper, headed “Reichenbach hero finds kidnap victim”.) (New article ”Ricoletti evades capture”. Your transcriber is already nearing page three of this transcript and is only two and a half minutes into the episode so let’s leave out the text of the article, but it suggests that the man named in the headline was responsible for the banker’s kidnap. We cut to Scotland Yard where D.I. Greg Lestrade is addressing a press conference. Sherlock and John stand nearby, and D.S. Sally Donovan and Doctor WhoCaresWhatHisFirstNameIs Anderson are at the back of the room.) LESTRADE Peter Ricoletti, number one on Interpol’s Most Wanted list since nineteen eighty-two. But we got him; and there’s one person we have to thank for giving us the decisive leads… with all his customary diplomacy and tact. (Sherlock smiles insincerely towards Greg while John leans closer to Sherlock and speaks quietly.) JOHN Sarcasm. SHERLOCK Yes. (As the press applaud, Greg walks over to Sherlock and gives him a gift-wrapped package, smiling cheerfully.) LESTRADE We all chipped in. (As Sherlock tears open the wrapping paper, Sally and Anderson grin expectantly. He pulls out a deerstalker hat.) SHERLOCK (trying to smile) Oh! FIRST REPORTER Put the hat on! SECOND REPORTER Put the hat on! LESTRADE Yeah, Sherlock, put it on! (Sherlock looks at the reporters as if he’d like to kill them. John clears his throat uncomfortably.) JOHN (quietly) Just get it over with. (Glowering at him, Sherlock shoves the wrapping paper into his hands, then unhappily puts the hat on his head. Flashbulbs go mad and everyone applauds. At the back of the room, Sally claps with sarcastic delight as Anderson, the douche, grins smugly. Sherlock smiles at the press through gritted teeth and glances at Greg as if promising him a world of pain later.) (Some time later, the “Daily Star” prints a World Exclusive on its front page ”Boffin Sherlock solves another” with the strapline ”Hero ’Tec cracks ‘unsolvable’ case”.) 221B BAKER STREET. John is sitting on the sofa reading the papers while Sherlock, wearing his blue dressing gown over his shirt and trousers, stomps across the room and throws the Daily Star onto the pile of newspapers on the coffee table. SHERLOCK (indignantly) “Boffin”. “Boffin Sherlock Holmes”. JOHN Everybody gets one. SHERLOCK One what? JOHN Tabloid nickname ‘SuBo’; ‘Nasty Nick’. Shouldn’t worry – I’ll probably get one soon. SHERLOCK Page five, column six, first sentence. (John turns to the relevant page. Sherlock goes over to the fireplace, picks up the deerstalker, holds it up and punches it angrily.) SHERLOCK Why is it always the hat photograph? JOHN (looking at the newspaper article) “Bachelor John Watson”? SHERLOCK What sort of hat is it anyway? JOHN “Bachelor”? What the hell are they implying? SHERLOCK (holding up the hat and twisting it back and forth rapidly) Is it a cap? Why has it got two fronts? JOHN (glancing up briefly) It’s a deerstalker. (He reads more of the article.) “Frequently seen in the company of bachelor John Watson…” SHERLOCK You stalk a deer with a hat? What are you gonna do – throw it? JOHN (looking at another part of the article) “…confirmed bachelor John Watson”! SHERLOCK Some sort of death frisbee? JOHN Okay, this is too much. We need to be more careful. SHERLOCK It’s got flaps…,ear flaps. It’s an ear hat, John. (He accurately skims the hat across the room to John, who doesn’t even have to lift his hand to catch it.) SHERLOCK What do you mean, “more careful”? JOHN I mean this isn’t a deerstalker now; it’s a Sherlock Holmes hat. I mean that you’re not exactly a private detective any more. (He holds his thumb and forefinger an inch apart.) You’re this far from famous. SHERLOCK Oh, it’ll pass. (He slumps down into his armchair and folds his hands in the prayer position in front of his mouth.) JOHN It’d better pass. The press will turn, Sherlock. They always turn, and they’ll turn on you. (Sherlock lowers his hands and looks more closely at John.) SHERLOCK It really bothers you. JOHN What? SHERLOCK What people say. JOHN Yes. SHERLOCK About me? I don’t understand – why would it upset you? (John holds his gaze for a moment, then looks away.) JOHN Just try to keep a low profile. Find yourself a little case this week. Stay out of the news. TOWER OF LONDON 11 : 00 Tourists are walking about in the grounds, looking around, talking to the Beefeaters, taking photographs. One tourist wearing jeans, trainers, a light grey jacket and a cap with “London” printed on it and with a union flag on the peak is aiming his camera phone around and taking pictures like all the others, but this one appears to be more interested in the security staff than anything else. The other thing that piques his interest is the sign pointing the way to the Crown Jewels. He lowers his camera, chewing nonchalantly on a piece of gum, and we see that this is none other than Jim Moriarty. At 221B, a phone in the living room trills a text alert. Sherlock is sitting at the table in the kitchen, looking into his microscope. John comes along the corridor leading from Sherlock’s bedroom with wet hair, wearing a bathrobe and towelling the back of his neck dry. JOHN It’s your phone. SHERLOCK (disinterestedly) Mm. Keeps doing that.
Recommended publications
  • The Baker Street Roommates: Friendship, Romance and Sexuality of Sherlock Holmes and John Watson in the Doyle Canon and BBC’S Sherlock
    The Baker street roommates: Friendship, romance and sexuality of Sherlock Holmes and John Watson in the Doyle canon and BBC’s Sherlock. Riku Parviainen 682285A Bachelor’s Seminar and Thesis English Philology Faculty of Humanities University of Oulu Spring 2020 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................... ................................................................................... 1 1. The Meeting ................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 The doctor and the detective ......................................................................................... 3 1.2 The detective’s past ....................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The meeting re-envisioned ....... ................................................................................... 7 2. Bachelor life at Baker street .......................................................................................... 9 2.1 Victorian friendship ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Watson: the incompetent partner?................................................................................. 11 2.3 Conflict at Baker street ................................................................................................. 14 3. Romance at Baker street ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Empty Hearse S
    1 EXT. CEMETERY. DAY. 1 A stark black gravestone. Dead flowers wilted round the base, messages scrawled on damp cards. The ink has run. It’s like a shrine. The stone’s a bit grubby but the name in gold letters is unmistakable - SHERLOCK HOLMES A shadow falls across it... JOHN (V.O.) Sherlock!! CUT TO: 2 EXT. BART’S HOSPITAL ROOF. DAY. 2 ...flashback... SHERLOCK, phone in hand, stands on the roof of Bart’s. Below him, PASSERS-BY, a red phone-box, a parked laundry van... SHERLOCK (into phone) It’s a trick, John. Just a magic trick. CUT TO: Behind him, the dead body of JIM still lies, blood pooling around his shattered head. CUT TO: JOHN Stop it! John takes a step into the road. SHERLOCK Don’t! Don’t move. Stay right where you are. Keep your eyes fixed on me. I need you to do this for me. JOHN Do what? SHERLOCK This phone call. It’s my note. That’s what people do, isn’t it? Leave a note? 2. JOHN Leave a note when? SHERLOCK Goodbye, John. JOHN No - ! And Sherlock throws himself from the roof... JOHN (CONT’D) Sherlock!! John rushes across the street - and a CYCLIST slams into him. John’s hurled to the tarmac. The cyclist doesn’t stop. John doesn’t see what happens next... CUT TO: 3 INT. BART’S HOSPITAL. DAY. 3 Two MEN in black fatigues manhandle JIM’s corpse into a lift. Fast, ‘Mission Impossible’ style cuts. CUT TO: CLOSE on a contact lens holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Phubber Sherlock, Risky London, Safe England: Remaking Holmes in the Age of Information Technology
    Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 43.1 March 2017: 329-347 DOI: 10.6240/concentric.lit.2017.43.1.15 Phubber Sherlock, Risky London, Safe England: Remaking Holmes in the Age of Information Technology Chung-jen Chen Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures National Taiwan University, Taiwan Abstract I intend to read the latest BBC production of Sherlock by exploring the making of digitized modernity in which confidence in science and technology is not only prominent but fundamental to instrumental rationality. Showing that violence may exist purely for the sake of violence, not for retaliation or out of self-interest, I argue that the remake of Sherlock is not concerned with criminals but criminality. By pointing out the discursive formation of digital citizenship endowed with indiscriminative rights of membership in the constant shadow of terrorist attacks, I argue that a safe England must be constructed in spite of the necessity of risk. Sherlock reveals a path leading to a digitized brave new world in which risks will be perceived as information, terrorist attacks conceived as incentives in an extended, reiterated game of prisoner’s dilemma, collective safety achieved through the calculation of coding, decoding and the networking of information technology, and every single life incarcerated within the process of capturing the torrent of big data. While digital citizenship promises a future of open access, free participation, and a lower barrier of entry, the promised democracy of information technology leads to the unavoidability of criminality and fear, leading to the coexistence of safety and risk. Keywords Sherlock, modernity, risk, governmental rationality, Benedict Cumberbatch, information technology, mobile phones 330 Concentric 43.1 March 2017 “This is my hard drive, and it only makes sense to put things in there that are useful.” —Sherlock in BBC’s “The Great Game” Since his literary birth in 1887, Sherlock Holmes has been synonymous with a detective hero who knows all, sees all, and solves all.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherlock Holmes and James Moriarty: Victorian Genius in a Millennial World
    University of Dayton eCommons Honors Theses University Honors Program Spring 4-2015 Sherlock Holmes and James Moriarty: Victorian Genius in a Millennial World Allison K. Carey University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons eCommons Citation Carey, Allison K., "Sherlock Holmes and James Moriarty: Victorian Genius in a Millennial World" (2015). Honors Theses. 46. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses/46 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Sherlock Holmes and James Moriarty: Victorian Genius in a Millennial World Honors Thesis Allison K. Carey Department: English Advisor: John P. McCombe, Ph.D. April 2015 Sherlock Holmes and James Moriarty: Victorian Genius in a Millennial World Honors Thesis Allison K. Carey Department: English Advisor: John P. McCombe, Ph.D. April 2015 Abstract In 1887, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle published his first novel regarding the detective Sherlock Holmes. He would go on to publish another three novels and 56 short stories detailing the great detective’s endeavors. Today, 128 years later, Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes is as popular, as relevant, and as alive as ever. Adaptations continue to be made and achieve success, including the BBC’s mini-series, Sherlock. This modern adaptation and its interpretation of Conan Doyle’s characters, novels, stories, plots, and themes allow for a unique combination of Victorian and Modern England.
    [Show full text]
  • Group No.: S17-ENG-K11 Mikkel Hill Larsen (48842) Pelle Imlau
    Group No.: S17-ENG-K11 Supervisor: Ebbe Klitgård Mikkel Hill Larsen (48842) No. Of characters: 69093 (28,8 pages) Pelle Imlau-Jeppesen (49647) Language: English K3 English F2017 Roskilde University ABSTRACT This project investigates how the antagonist James Moriarty has been portrayed as a villain in Guy Ritchie’s motion picture Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011) and the BBC TV Series Sherlock (2010-2017). Through a thematic analysis focusing on the subjects we have called “The Antagonist in Motion” and “Homoerocity and emotions in BBC’s Sherlock”, the project concludes the following: the film Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows creates a much more contrastive relationship between villain and hero, which can be seen as a way of incorporating the social class dynamics of Conan Doyle’s original text. However, in adapting this dynamic for a 21st century audience, the villain of Moriarty is first and foremost portrayed as a corrupt businessman rather than an elitist socialite or plain revengeful evildoer. In the BBC series the characters of Sherlock and Jim share an intimate relationship due to their many likenesses. Jim is a fluid character that navigates both gender, sexuality and personality. As a villain Jim is presented as a seductive psychopath that has no desire of money or power but has an ultimate goal of breaking Sherlock. Page 1 of 40 NOTE TO THE READER Throughout the project we will for convenience sake refer to Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011) as A Game of Shadows and the BBC series Sherlock (2010-2017) as Sherlock (in italic).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    FROM REVERENCE TO REFERENCE: RETHINKING CONTEMPORARY CROSS-MEDIA ADAPTATION By TANIA DARLINGTON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2014 © 2014 Tania Darlington To Lorelei Without your faith in me, I would not have made it this far. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project has been a labor of love, but one that truly would not have gotten far past page one without the help of the many people who supported me and pushed me to keep going. I would like to thank Scott Nygren, who started this project with me and shared his limitless patience and insight for most of its duration; I am sorry he cannot be here to see me finish it. I would also like to thank my dissertation supervisor, Barbara Mennel, whose generosity with her time and her feedback have inspired me to be a better writer, student, and teacher. I have also been blessed with wonderful committee members—Kenneth Kidd, Judith Page, and Jack Stenner—whose kindness and flexibility have made this process shockingly painless. Though he hasn't been my teacher or my advisor in many years, I also must thank Aiping Zhang, who has been my champion and source of encouragement for the majority of my academic career. This project also would never have been possible without my mother, Sharlyn Swofford, and my daughter, Lorelei Chamberlain. No matter how much I fretted over my ability to complete this work, both had unwavering faith that I would finish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Alterity for the Construction of Identity in BBC's
    The Role of Alterity for the Construction of Identity in BBC’s Sherlock Masterarbeit im Ein-Fach-Masterstudiengang, Fach “English and American Literatures, Cultures, and Media” der Philosophischen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Wiebke Wilhelmine Pauketat Erstgutachter: Prof. Christian Huck Zweitgutchterin: Prof. Annegreth Horatschek Kiel im Dezember 2013 2 Table of Content 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 3 2 Theory ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 The importance of alterity for identity construction ...................................... 7 2.2 Concept reality/fiction, film techniques ...................................................... 10 3 Analysis ........................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Perspective and Identification with Sherlock/Sherlock´s side of the story.. 16 3.2 Moriarty as a concept and not just a character (more than just a villain) ... 21 3.3 Moriarty – as he is depicted as alterity ...................................................... 28 3.3.1 Expectations/schemes ....................................................................... 28 3.3.2 Scenes .............................................................................................. 32 4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sherlock Holmes in Context Editor Sam Naidu Rhodes University Grahamstown, South Africa
    Crime Files Series Editor Clive Bloom Professor Emeritus Middlesex University London United Kingdom Since its invention in the nineteenth century, detective fiction has never been more popular. In novels, short stories, films, radio, television and now in computer games, private detectives and psychopaths, poisoners and overworked cops, tommy gun gangsters and cocaine criminals are the very stuff of modern imagination, and their creators one mainstay of popular consciousness. Crime Files is a ground-breaking series offering scholars, students and discerning readers a comprehensive set of guides to the world of crime and detective fiction. Every aspect of crime writing, detective fiction, gangster movie, true-crime exposé, police procedural and post-colonial investigation is explored through clear and informative texts offering comprehensive coverage and theoretical sophistication. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/14927 Sam Naidu Editor Sherlock Holmes in Context Editor Sam Naidu Rhodes University Grahamstown, South Africa Crime Files ISBN 978-1-137-55594-6 ISBN 978-1-137-55595-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-55595-3 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017931563 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat's Great Game of Fandom: Investigating The
    Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat’s Great Game of Fandom: Investigating the Creator-Text-Fan Relationship of BBC’s A Thesis Presented to the Department of Communication and Arts at Roskilde University In Partial Fulfilment of Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts English & Communication Presented by Marie Sophie Kindler [email protected] / [email protected] Studienr.: 58727 Under the Supervision of Ebbe Klitgård Submitted on 28th of June 2017 Abstract This thesis is investigating the reciprocal relationship between author, text and fan. Approaching the modern realisation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s original Sherlock Holmes phenomenon, this thesis focusses on BBC’s television series Sherlock. Written by Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss, the show is critically acclaimed for its accomplishment to update the Victorian stories without losing its loyalty to the source text. Because of its production approach, the series is particularly interesting for participatory audiences, which is why it gathered an enormous fanbase. Additionally to their intertextual adaptation approach (that references previous interpretations as much as the canon itself), Gatiss and Moffat’s self- declared “fanboyness” attracts fans who celebrate the co-writers for their fannish motivation. However, the ambiguity of Gatiss and Moffat’s fan-producer behaviour has considerably blurred the lines between official production and fandom. Therefore, discursive-struggles between the fans and the co-writers testify the important role of authors for fan audiences. While the fans acknowledge Gatiss and Moffat’s creative power, they contest the ways in which it is wielded. This becomes apparent by looking at the queerbaiting controversy that unleashed in January 2017, shortly after Sherlock’s final episode.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Audiences on Sherlock Holmes a Discussion of Holmes’S Characteristics in Conan Doyle’S Stories and BBC Series Sherlock
    The influence of audiences on Sherlock Holmes A discussion of Holmes’s characteristics in Conan Doyle’s stories and BBC series Sherlock Fig. 1: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. A Study in Scarlet. London: BBC Books, 2011. Chantal Wolters S1004528 BA Thesis English Literature and Language Dr. N. Van Pelt & Dr. C.J.J. Louttit 03-07-2020 Chantal Wolters, s1004528/1 ENGELSE TAAL EN CULTUUR Teacher who will receive this document: Dr. N.T. Van Pelt and Dr. C.J.J. Louttit Title of document: BA Thesis on Sherlock Holmes Name of course: BA Thesis English Literature and Language Date of submission: 03-07-2020 Please read the Faculty’s Declaration concerning Fraud and Plagiarism preceding this cover sheet. By signing this cover sheet, you also acknowledge your knowledge of and agreement with its terms. The work submitted here is the sole responsibility of the undersigned, who has neither committed plagiarism nor colluded in its production. Signed Name of student: Chantal Wolters Student number: s1004528 Chantal Wolters, s1004528/2 Abstract Sherlock is a modern adaptation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s stories on Sherlock Holmes. In this thesis, I discuss the audiences’ influence in causing a modern Sherlock Holmes adaptation to deviate from Conan Doyle’s stories. I argue that Holmes’s characteristics and the binary opposition between Holmes as the hero and Moriarty as the villain, as presented in Conan Doyle’s stories, has changed in Sherlock. Therefore, I focus on answering the following question in this thesis: How are Holmes’s typical Victorian characteristics and the binary opposition between Holmes and Moriarty as presented in Conan Doyle’s stories adapted in BBC series Sherlock? In the first chapter, I discuss that Holmes’s characteristics conform to the ‘typical’ Victorian hero of “A Study in Scarlet” and “The Final Problem”.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Project Uvic.Pdf
    1 “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” Sherlock Holmes, The Sign of The Four 2 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 6 1.1. MOTIVATIONS ................................................................................................... 6 1.2. HYPOTHESIS .................................................................................................... 6 1.3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 7 2. ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE ..................................................................................... 10 2.1. BIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................... 10 2.2. DOYLE’S INFLUENCE ..................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 IN LITERATURE ......................................................................................... 13 2.2.2 IN CINEMATOGRAPHY ............................................................................. 13 2.2.3 IN SOCIETY ............................................................................................... 13 2.3 SOCIAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................... 14 3. SHERLOCK HOLMES CANON .............................................................................. 16 3.1 PLOT ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Empty Hearse”
    “Everything Was Anticipated, Every Eventuality Allowed For”: Fan Service, Past and Present, in “The Empty Hearse” Maria Alberto, Cleveland State University Title character Sherlock Holmes makes an oddly encompassing statement toward the beginning of “The Empty Hearse,” the seventh episode of the BBC’s 2010-present show Sherlock: as he prepares to explain a crucial plan to best friend John Watson, Holmes asserts that “Everything was anticipated, every eventuality allowed for” (“The Empty Hearse”). While Holmes is implying that his planning was extensive enough to prepare for every possible outcome, Watson’s reaction of confusion and anger clearly puts the lie to the detective’s assertion of infallibility – much in the same way that fans might put the lie to the show writers’ confidence of fulfilling all audience hopes for Sherlock’s heavily-anticipated third season. According to Christopher Redmond, Sherlock Holmes one of the most prolific characters from literature (232), so often and so widely portrayed that it is nearly impossible to count exactly how many times he has made an appearance in either traditional or contemporary media. In a 2009 estimate, though, Redmond enumerates over 200 films (232-242), over 6,000 scholarly articles (290-1), and multiple additional offerings in media ranging from theatre and television to music, comics, and television. This wealth and variety of Holmes-derived narratives can be attributed to a number of factors, including the “timeless” appeal of the adventure story, Holmes’s pioneering deductive method, and/or Watson’s Everyman-esque insight into the workings of detective procedure – but the consistent demand for and popularity of Sherlock Holmes stories also stems, in large part, from inherent audience participation.
    [Show full text]