Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor)
The Physics of Galaxy Cluster Outskirts
Stephen Walker · Aurora Simionescu · Daisuke Nagai · Nobuhiro Okabe · Dominique Eckert · Tony Mroczkowski · Hiroki Akamatsu · Stefano Ettori · Vittorio Ghirardini
Received: date / Accepted: date
Stephen Walker Astrophysics Science Division, X-ray Astrophysics Laboratory, Code 662, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA E-mail: [email protected] Aurora Simionescu SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), JAXA, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-5210, Japan Daisuke Nagai Department of Physics, Yale University, PO Box 208101, New Haven, CT, USA Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, PO Box 208101, New Haven, CT, USA Nobuhiro Okabe Department of Physical Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi- Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan Dominique Eckert Max-Planck-Institut f¨urextraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstrasse 1, 85748 Garching, Germany Tony Mroczkowski European Southern Observatory (ESO), Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, D-85748 Garching, Ger- many Hiroki Akamatsu SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands Stefano Ettori INAF, Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio, via Pietro Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, Italy INFN, Sezione di Bologna, viale Berti Pichat 6/2, I-40127 Bologna, Italy Vittorio Ghirardini Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Universit di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti, 93/2, 40129 Bologna, Italy INAF, Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio, via Pietro Gobetti 93/3, 40129 arXiv:1810.00890v2 [astro-ph.CO] 4 Jan 2019 Bologna, Italy 2 Stephen Walker et al.
Abstract As the largest virialized structures in the universe, galaxy clusters continue to grow and accrete matter from the cosmic web. Due to the low gas density in the outskirts of clusters, measurements are very challenging, requir- ing extremely sensitive telescopes across the entire electromagnetic spectrum. Observations using X-rays, the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, and weak lensing and galaxy distributions from the optical band, have over the last decade helped to unravel this exciting new frontier of cluster astrophysics, where the infall and virialization of matter takes place. Here, we review the current state of the art in our observational and theoretical understanding of cluster outskirts, and discuss future prospects for exploration using newly planned and proposed observatories. Keywords Galaxy clusters intracluster matter ·
1 What are the physical processes unique to cluster outskirts?
In recent years, the exploration of galaxy cluster outskirts has emerged as one of the new frontiers for studying cluster astrophysics and cosmology. It is a new territory for understanding the physics of intracluster medium (ICM) and intergalactic medium (IGM), and it is particularly important for the interpre- tation of recent X-ray and SZ observations and cluster mass estimates based on these observations. In the hierarchical structure formation model, galaxy clusters grow and evolve through a series of mergers and accretion from the surrounding large-scale structure in their outer envelope. Hydrodynamical cos- mological simulations predict that accretion and mergers are ubiquitous and important for cluster formation. The accretion physics leaves distinctive marks especially in the outer envelopes of galaxy clusters, giving rise to caustics in the dark matter (DM) density profile, an inhomogeneous gas density distribution, internal bulk and turbulent gas motions, and non-equilibrium electrons in the ICM. We describe all these effects in detail in the subsections that follow.
1.1 Physically significant scales and radii in the outskirts
Recent works have shown that accreting DM forms the so-called “splashback radius” (Diemer and Kravtsov 2014), which defines a natural boundary for a DM halo. The splashback radius (Rsp) arises from the recently accreted DM particles piling up at the apocenter of the halo as they re-emerge from the halo center after first infall (Adhikari et al. 2014; Shi 2016b). This process creates a caustic (see the dashed curves on the left panels of Fig.1) that can be identified as a sharp drop in the DM density profiles and is reflected also in the phase space structure of the DM (Mansfield et al. 2017; Diemer et al. 2017). Since the splashback process is governed by the infall velocity of DM particles and the gravitational potential of the halo, the splashback radius also depends on the mass accretion rate (MAR) of the DM halo (More et al. 2015), as shown in the right panel of Fig.1. The Physics of Galaxy Cluster Outskirts 3
3.0 Mansfield+17 model fit
Rsp 2.5 Rsh
m 2.0 200 R/R 1.5
1.0
0.5 0 2 4 6 Γ (0.0 z 0.5) 200m ≤ ≤
Fig. 1 Left panels: Gas entropy (top left), DM density (top right), gas temperature (bottom left) and gas pressure (bottom right) maps of the simulated cluster extracted from the non-radiative Omega500 hydrodynamical cosmological simulation. The inner dashed lines indicate the splashback shell computed using the method from Mansfield et al.(2017), whereas the outer white lines indicate the shock shell found by the discontinuous jump in entropy as well as pressure. Note that the accretion shocks are located outside of the splashback radius. Right panels: The splashback radius Rsp (red points) and the accretion shock radius Rsh (blue points), normalized by the halo radius R200m, plotted as a function of the mass accretion rate (MAR) of the cluster-size halos, Γ200m. The solid line is the Rsp Γ relation from DM-only cosmological simulations (Mansfield et al. 2017). The dashed− line indicates the fitted relation of Rsh/Rsp measured in the Omega500 simulation. Figures taken from Aung et al. in preparation and reprinted with permission.
The dynamics of accreting gas, on the other hand, is distinct from that of collisionless DM, because the collisional gas is shock heated during its first infall (Lau et al. 2015; Shi 2016a). The accretion shock (with radius Rsh) thus defines the spatial extent of the hot gas in DM halos (see the solid curves on the left panels in Fig.1) and plays an important role in a variety of cluster science, such as modeling of the ICM thermodynamics for X-ray and microwave surveys. This accretion shock is referred to as an “external shock” in the previous studies of shocks in galaxy clusters (e.g. Ryu et al. 2003; Molnar et al. 2009). The external accretion shock is due to the infall of low density gas from the void regions onto the cluster potential, and is different from “internal shocks” due to mergers and filamentary accretion. It is the external accretion shock that forms the outer boundary of the gas halo. Because the accretion shock directly relates to the infall process, it also serves as an important probe for mass assembly of the cluster gas. In practice, the mass of the cluster is usually quoted within an overdensity 3 radius r∆ as M∆ (4π/3)∆ρcrit(z)r , where ρcrit(z) is the critical density of ≡ ∆ the universe at the redshift of the cluster, and r∆ is the radius within which the mean enclosed density is ∆ ρcrit(z). ∆ = 500 roughly corresponds to the radius out to which the current× Chandra and XMM-Newton cluster observa- 4 Stephen Walker et al.
tions can reliably measure gas density and temperature profiles of the ICM. As such, any regions between R500c and the shock radius Rsh are considered the outskirts of galaxy clusters, where the ratios of various radius definitions are approximately given by R500c : R200c : R200m : Rsp : Rsh = 1 : 1.4 : 3 : 4 : 6. Perhaps the most common reference radius in cluster outskirts studies is R200c, often denoted more simply as r200 and referred to as the virial ra- dius. The use of r200 for the virial radius stems from early calculations which considered the collapse of a spherical top hat perturbation. After initially ex- panding along with the rest of the universe, the gravitational force of such a perturbation is sufficient to slow its expansion, decoupling it from the uni- verse’s expansion, and allowing it to eventually stop expanding (at its turn around radius) and collapse. Eventually the collapsing perturbation reaches virial equilibrium within its virial radius, which is equal to half of the turn around radius. For an Einstein-de Sitter universe (Ωm = 1) this virial radius is r 2 r178, which for simplicity has historically been rounded to r200. For 18π ≈ a ΛCDM universe (Ωm = 0.3, ΩΛ = 0.7), the virial radius found from this spherical top-hat calculation is actually r100=1.36r200. However, as the use of r200 to refer to the virial radius remains prevalent in the literature, it is this value that we shall use in this review. When scaling by the mean mass density of the universe rather than the critical density of the universe, the subscript letter changes from c to m. In this review, when it is not explicitly specified, the radii and masses are scaled by the critical density of the universe.
1.2 Radial Profiles of the Thermodynamical Properties in the ICM
15 −1 Figure2 shows the radial ICM profiles of a M200c = 1.1 10 h M cluster at z = 0 from the nIFTy radiative simulation cluster comparison× project (Sem- bolini et al. 2016). Starting from the same initial condition, these simulations were performed using 10 different codes (RAMSES, 2 incarnations of AREPO and 7 of GADGET) and modeling hydrodynamics with full subgrid physics of galaxy formation, including radiative cooling, star formation and thermal ac- tive galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback. This demonstrates that, while there are still significant variations in the simulated ICM profiles in the inner regions (r < R2500c), the prediction of the ICM profiles in the outskirts of clusters (r > R500c) is remarkably robust to the numerical schemes as well as the still uncertain cluster core physics. Figure3 shows the evolution of the ICM profiles in the Omega500 adia- batic cosmological simulation performed by using the ART code (Lau et al. 2015). This figure illustrates that the inner ICM profiles are self-similar when the profiles are normalized with respect to the critical density of the universe, while the ICM profiles in the outskirts are self-similar when they are normal- ized with respect to the mean mass density of the universe. This trend arises from the fact that the inner regions have formed early when the universe was still matter dominated (ΩM 1), while the cluster outskirts have accreted ≈ The Physics of Galaxy Cluster Outskirts 5
3 2 2 1 1 0
residuals 0 residuals -1 -1 -2 1016
1015 1000 ] ) ] 2 3 cm -2 Mpc -3 14 /(h 10 [keV h SUN Ramses-AGN Ramses-AGN 2/3 e M ArepoIL
-1 100 ArepoIL G3-X G3-X [ h G2-X G2-X G3-PESPH
GAS 13 G3-PESPH S = T/n
ρ 10 G3-Magnet.
G3-Magnet. G3-OWLS G3-OWLS ArepoSH ArepoSH G3-MUSIC G3-MUSIC G2-MUSICpi G2-MUSICpi 10 1012
0.1 1.0 0.1 1.0 R [h-1 Mpc] R [h-1 Mpc]
1.0 3 0.5 2 0.0 1 -0.5
residuals -1.0 residuals 0 -1.5 -1 Ramses-AGN Ramses-AGN 15 ArepoIL 1.5 ArepoIL G3-X G3-X G2-X G2-X G3-PESPH 15 G3-PESPH G3-Magnet. G3-Magnet. G3-OWLS )] ArepoSH m G3-OWLS Ω ArepoSH G3-MUSIC / b G3-MUSIC
G2-MUSICpi Ω 10 1.0 G2-MUSICpi K]
10 7 (< R)/( gas T [10 kT [ keV ]
5 (< R) [f 0.5 gas ϒ
5
0 0 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.1 1.0 R [h-1 Mpc] R [h-1 Mpc]
Fig. 2 Radial ICM profiles at z = 0 from the nIFTy radiative simulation cluster comparison project, showing gas density (top-left), entropy (top-right), temperature (bottom-left), and gas fraction (bottom-right). The top panel shows the difference between each simulation and the reference G3-MUSIC simulation. The dashed line indicates to R2500c and the dotted line to R500c for the reference G3-MUSIC values. Figures taken from Sembolini et al.(2016), reprinted with permission.
materials recently and their mass accretion rate is affected by the repulsive force of dark energy.
1.3 Gas clumping
Simulations of clusters (Nagai and Lau 2011; Roncarelli et al. 2013) predict that in the outskirts the gas density distribution becomes increasing inhomoge- nous (i.e. ‘clumpy’). One might expect the survivability of these gas clumps to thermal conduction and hydrodynamic instabilities during the infall to de- pend on details of the ICM microphysics – therefore, in addition to being a source of bias that must be addressed and quantified, the level of gas clumping 6 Stephen Walker et al.
z = 0.0 10 10 z = 0.5 z = 1.0 c m 200
z = 1.5 200 /K /K ) )
r 1 1 r ( ( K K
0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 −0.4 −0.4 −0.6 −0.6 − 0.1 1 − 0.1 1 r/R200c r/R200m
Fig. 3 Evolution of the average gas entropy profiles at z = 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 from the Omega500 adiabatic cosmological simulation. The lower subplot in each panel shows the deviations of the profiles from different z outputs relative to that of the z = 0.5 clusters. The left panel shows the profiles of cluster halos defined using the critical density, while the right panel shows the profiles of the same cluster halos defined using the mean density. The shaded regions indicate the 1σ scatter around the mean gas profiles for the z = 0 clusters. Figures taken from Lau et al.(2015), reprinted with permission.
can ultimately hold important clues about the physics of large-scale structure growth. In X-ray analyses of galaxy clusters, it is commonly assumed that the ICM is a single phase medium characterized by one temperature and gas density within each radial bin. If this approximation holds, then the thermodynamical properties of the ICM inferred from X-ray studies should follow closely the radial trends predicted by the numerical simulations shown in the previous section. However, if the ICM is clumpy, the gas density inferred from the X- p ray surface brightness is overestimated by C(r), with
2 2 C ρ / ρgas . (1) ≡ h gasi h i
Although the bias in the inferred ICM mass is moderate (< 10%) in the high- pressured regions in the interior of galaxy clusters (Mathiesen et al. 1999), gas clumping can become significant in the outskirts (r > r200) and could serve as a major source of systematic bias in X-ray measurements of ICM profiles (Nagai and Lau 2011; Roncarelli et al. 2013). Fig.4 shows that the clumping factor of the X-ray emitting gas (T > 106 K) expected from numerical simulations is C 1.3 at r = r200, and it increases with radius, reaching C 5 at r = 2r200. ∼ 2/3 ∼ From the definition of entropy S Te/ne , the overestimate of gas density due to clumping causes an underestimate≡ of the observed entropy profile by C(r)1/3 if the clumps have the same temperature as the ambient medium. The Physics of Galaxy Cluster Outskirts 7
Fig. 4 Left panel: the mass dependence of the median clumping factor profiles of gas with 6 14 1 T > 10 K. Results are shown for the present-day (z = 0) clusters with M200 > 10 h− M 14 1 (solid lines) and M200 < 10 h− M (dashed lines), respectively, in the runs including cooling and star formation (CSF, thick) and non-radiative (NR, thin) runs. Right panel: the redshift dependence of the median clumping factor profiles in the CSF (thick) and NR (thin) runs at z = 0 (solid lines) and z = 0.6 (dashed lines). The errorbars on the solid lines indicate the interquartile range. Figures taken from Nagai and Lau(2011), reprinted with permission.
1.4 Bulk motions, turbulence and deviations from hydrostatic equilibrium
Merging and accretion events generate a significant level of bulk and turbulent gas motions within the ICM and affect its thermodynamic structure (see the left panel of Figure5). Hydrodynamical simulations predict that the non- thermal pressure provided by these gas motions increases from 10% at ≈ r = R500c to 30% at r = 2R500c (Lau et al. 2009; Vazza et al. 2009; Battaglia et al. 2012) on≈ average. The non-thermal pressure fraction also depends on the mass accretion rate (Nelson et al. 2014; Shi et al. 2015) which gives rise to a scatter for cluster-size halos with any given mass (see the right panel of Fig. 5). Understanding the non-thermal pressure in galaxy clusters is especially im- portant because X-ray and SZ observations typically measure only the thermal pressure of the gas. The non-thermal pressure, if neglected, introduces biases in our physical understanding of the ICM profiles as well as the hydrostatic mass estimation. The increasing kinetic energy fraction at larger radii in particular can lead to suppressed temperatures and flatter entropy profiles in cluster out- skirts. Gas motions also contribute to the support against gravity which leads to biases in cluster mass estimates based on the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium (HSE) (Rasia et al. 2006; Nagai et al. 2007; Nelson et al. 2012, 2014a; Shi et al. 2016). The HSE mass bias remains one of the primary sources of systematic uncertainties in the calibration of cluster observable-mass rela- 8 Stephen Walker et al.
1e7 1.5 Relaxed 8
1.0 7
0.5 6
5 0.0
Mpc/h 4 Temperature (K) Temperature −0.5 3
−1.0 2
Velocity 1 −1.5 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Mpc/h 500 km/s
Fig. 5 Left panel: Gas velocity field (shown by the white vectors) in a slice through a galaxy cluster simulation after subtracting the global mean bulk velocity of the cluster. The underlying colour map represents the gas temperature of this relaxed cluster. The black circles show r2500, r500 and r200. Figure taken from Nelson et al.(2014a), reprinted with permission. Right panel: The profile of non-thermal pressure fraction, f P /P nth ≡ nth total (where the total pressure, Ptotal, is the sum of the thermal pressure, Pth, and the non- thermal pressure, Pnth), as a function of the cluster-centric radius scaled with r200m at z = 0. Modelled and simulated profiles of an early growth sub-sample (Γ200m < 1.8, red lines) and a late growth sub-sample (Γ200m > 2.7,lines) are shown. This plot compares the predicted profiles from the analytic model of Shi and Komatsu(2014) (modeled) with the profiles for a cosmological hydrodynamics simulation from Nelson et al.(2014) (simulated), showing good agreement between the two methods. The lines and the shaded regions are the mean profile of the sample and the 16/84 percentiles, respectively. Figure taken from Shi et al.(2015), reprinted with permission.
tions and cosmological parameters derived from clusters (Allen et al. 2008; Vikhlinin et al. 2009; Planck Collaboration et al. 2013a).
1.5 Electron-Ion Equilibration in Cluster Outskirts
X-ray and SZ measurements of the hot gas in galaxy clusters are often inter- preted under a number of simplifying assumptions on the poorly understood physics of the ICM. One such assumption is that the electrons are in thermal equilibrium with the surrounding ions; i.e., Te = Ti. However, this assump- tion is untenable in the low-density outskirts of galaxy clusters (see Fig.6) due to the extended timescale for electrons to reach equilibrium via Coulomb collisions (Avestruz et al. 2015, and references therein). When an electron-ion plasma passes through a shock, most of the kinetic energy goes into heating the heavier ions, causing Ti Te. After the shock, electrons and ions slowly equilibrate via Coulomb interactions, each converging to the mean gas temper- ature, Tgas = (neTe + niTi)/(ne + ni), over a typical electron-ion equilibration timescale, tei. The evolution of the electron temperature is given by,
dTe Ti Te = − (γ 1)Te ( v) , (2) dt tei − − ∇ · The Physics of Galaxy Cluster Outskirts 9
1.0 1.00
0.9 0.95 0.8 0.90 0.7 s a 0.6 g 0.85 T / 0.5 e T 0.80 0.4 0.75 14 1 0.7 Fig. 6 Left panels: Sliced maps of Te/Tgas for the most relaxed and least massive cluster from the Omega500 non-radiative simulation. The colorbar indicates Te/Tgas. The dimension for each panel is 15.6 h 1Mpc 15.6 h 1Mpc, with depth of 7.6 h 1kpc. The circle in dashed − × − − line shows R200m of the cluster. Between 1.0 < R/R200m < 1.5, Te/Tgas is close to unity in the filamentary gas with high momentum flux entering the cluster well, but is significantly less than unity in the diffuse gas at the same cluster-centric radii. Right panels: Black lines show the average profiles of the mass-weighted temperature bias binned by mass for a sample of 65 simulated clusters at z = 0 and their mainline progenitor data at z = 0.5, 1, and 1.5 prior to binning the profiles by mass. The number of clusters in each mass bin is denoted in parentheses in the legend label. Red lines show the fitting function (equation4) with input masses that correspond to the average mass in each bin. The shaded regions show the scatter of the cluster in each mass bin around the average profiles. Figures taken from Avestruz et al.(2015), reprinted with permission. where the second term accounts for adiabatic compression heating and cooling. For the fully ionized ICM, including contributions from both protons and He++, the timescale for equilibration is given by