DOCSLIB.ORG

Cluster–Galaxy Weak Lensing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cluster–Galaxy Weak Lensing Astron Astrophys Rev (2020)28:7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-020-00129-w(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) REVIEW ARTICLE Cluster–galaxy weak lensing Keiichi Umetsu1 Received: 2 July 2020 / Accepted: 7 October 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Weak gravitational lensing of background galaxies provides a direct probe of the projected matter distribution in and around galaxy clusters. Here, we present a self- contained pedagogical review of cluster–galaxy weak lensing, covering a range of topics relevant to its cosmological and astrophysical applications. We begin by reviewing the theoretical foundations of gravitational lensing from first principles, with a special attention to the basics and advanced techniques of weak gravitational lensing. We summarize and discuss key findings from recent cluster–galaxy weak- lensing studies on both observational and theoretical grounds, with a focus on cluster mass profiles, the concentration–mass relation, the splashback radius, and implications from extensive mass-calibration efforts for cluster cosmology. Keywords Cosmology: theory Á Dark matter Á Galaxies: clusters: general Á Gravitational lensing: weak Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 2 Theory of gravitational lensing................................................................................................ 2.1 Bending of light in an asymptotically flat spacetime .................................................... 2.2 Lens equation................................................................................................................... 2.3 Cosmological lens equation............................................................................................. 2.4 Flat-sky approximation...................................................................................................... 2.5 Multiple lens equation....................................................................................................... 2.6 Thin-lens equation ............................................................................................................. 3 Basics of cluster weak lensing................................................................................................... 3.1 Weak-lensing mass reconstruction.................................................................................... 3.2 E/B decomposition............................................................................................................. & Keiichi Umetsu [email protected] 1 Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ASIAA), No. 1, Section 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan 123 7 Page 2 of 106 K. Umetsu 3.3 Flexion................................................................................................................................ 3.4 Shear observables .............................................................................................................. 3.5 Tangential- and cross-shear components .......................................................................... 3.6 Reduced tangential shear................................................................................................... 3.7 Aperture mass densitometry.............................................................................................. 4 Standard shear analysis methods ............................................................................................... 4.1 Background source selection............................................................................................. 4.2 Tangential shear signal...................................................................................................... 4.3 Lens mass modeling .......................................................................................................... 4.4 Shear likelihood function .................................................................................................. 4.5 Stacked weak-lensing estimator ........................................................................................ 4.6 Quadrupole shear ............................................................................................................... 5 Magnification bias...................................................................................................................... 5.1 Magnified source counts ................................................................................................... 5.2 Magnification observables................................................................................................. 5.3 Nonlinear effects on the source-averaged magnification bias ......................................... 5.4 Observational systematics and null tests .......................................................................... 6 Recent advances in cluster weak-lensing observations ............................................................ 6.1 Cluster mass distribution ................................................................................................... 6.2 The concentration–mass relation....................................................................................... 6.3 Splashback radius .............................................................................................................. 6.4 Mass calibration for cluster cosmology............................................................................ 7 Conclusions................................................................................................................................. References......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction The propagation of light rays from a distant source to the observer is governed by the gravitational field of local inhomogeneities, as well as by the global geometry of the universe (Schneider et al. 1992). Hence, the images of background sources carry the imprint of gravitational lensing by intervening cosmic structures. Observations of gravitational lensing phenomena can thus be used to study the mass distribution of cosmic objects dominated by dark matter and to test models of cosmic structure formation (Blandford and Narayan 1992). Galaxy clusters represent the largest class of self-gravitating systems formed in the 14À15 À1 universe, with typical masses of M 10 h M . In the context of the standard structure formation scenario, cluster halos correspond to rare massive local peaks in the primordial density perturbations (e.g., Tinker et al. 2010). Galaxy clusters act as powerful cosmic lenses, producing a variety of detectable lensing effects from strong to weak lensing (Kneib and Natarajan 2011), including deflection, shearing, and magnifying of the images of background sources (e.g., Umetsu et al. 2016). The critical advantage of cluster gravitational lensing is its ability to study the mass distribution of individual and ensemble systems independent of assumptions about their physical and dynamical state (e.g., Clowe et al. 2006). Weak gravitational lensing is responsible for the weak shape distortion, or shear, and magnification of the images of background sources due to the gravitational field of intervening massive objects and large-scale structure (Bartelmann et al. 2001; Schneider 2005; Umetsu 2010; Hoekstra 2013; Mandelbaum 2018). Weak shear 123 Cluster–galaxy weak lensing Page 3 of 106 7 lensing by galaxy clusters gives rise to levels of up to a few 10% of elliptical distortions in images of background sources. Thus, the weak shear lensing signal, as measured from small but coherent image distortions in galaxy shapes, can provide a direct measure of the projected mass distribution of galaxy clusters (e.g., Kaiser and Squires 1993; Fahlman et al. 1994; Okabe and Umetsu 2008). On the other hand, lensing magnification can influence the observed surface number density of background galaxies seen behind clusters, by enhancing their apparent fluxes and expanding the area of sky (e.g., Broadhurst et al. 1995, 2005b; Taylor et al. 1998; Umetsu et al. 2011b; Chiu et al. 2020). The former effect increases the source counts above the limiting flux, whereas the latter reduces the effective observing area in the source plane, thus decreasing the observed number of sources per unit solid angle. The net effect, known as magnification bias, depends on the intrinsic faint-end slope of the source luminosity function. In this paper, we present a self-contained pedagogical review of weak gravitational lensing of background galaxies by galaxy clusters (cluster–galaxy weak lensing), highlighting recent advances in our theoretical and observational understanding of the mass distribution in galaxy clusters. We shall begin by reviewing the theoretical foundations of gravitational lensing (Sect. 2), with special attention to the basics and advanced techniques of cluster–galaxy weak lensing (Sects. 3, 4, and 5). Then, we highlight and discuss key findings from recent cluster– galaxy weak-lensing studies (Sects. 6), with a focus on cluster mass distributions (Sect. 6.1), the concentration–mass relation (Sect. 6.2), the splashback radius (Sect. 6.3), and implications from extensive mass-calibration efforts for cluster cosmology (Sect. 6.4). Finally, conclusions are given in Sect. 7. There have been a number of reviews of relevant subjects (e.g., Blandford and Narayan 1992;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INVESTIGATING ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI with LOW FREQUENCY RADIO OBSERVATIONS By
    INVESTIGATING ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI WITH LOW FREQUENCY RADIO OBSERVATIONS by MATTHEW LAZELL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Physics & Astronomy College of Engineering and Physical Sciences The University of Birmingham March 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Low frequency radio astronomy allows us to look at some of the fainter and older synchrotron emission from the relativistic plasma associated with active galactic nuclei in galaxies and clusters. In this thesis, we use the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope to explore the impact that active galactic nuclei have on their surroundings. We present deep, high quality, 150–610 MHz radio observations for a sample of fifteen predominantly cool-core galaxy clusters. We in- vestigate a selection of these in detail, uncovering interesting radio features and using our multi-frequency data to derive various radio properties. For well-known clusters such as MS0735, our low noise images enable us to see in improved detail the radio lobes working against the intracluster medium, whilst deriving the energies and timescales of this event.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the PHYSICS of CLUSTER MERGERS
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server To appear in Merging Processes in Clusters of Galaxies, edited by L. Feretti, I. M. Gioia, and G. Giovannini (Dordrecht: Kluwer), in press (2001) Chapter 1 THE PHYSICS OF CLUSTER MERGERS Craig L. Sarazin Department of Astronomy University of Virginia [email protected] Abstract Clusters of galaxies generally form by the gravitational merger of smaller clusters and groups. Major cluster mergers are the most energetic events in the Universe since the Big Bang. Some of the basic physical proper- ties of mergers will be discussed, with an emphasis on simple analytic arguments rather than numerical simulations. Semi-analytic estimates of merger rates are reviewed, and a simple treatment of the kinematics of binary mergers is given. Mergers drive shocks into the intracluster medium, and these shocks heat the gas and should also accelerate non- thermal relativistic particles. X-ray observations of shocks can be used to determine the geometry and kinematics of the merger. Many clus- ters contain cooling flow cores; the hydrodynamical interactions of these cores with the hotter, less dense gas during mergers are discussed. As a result of particle acceleration in shocks, clusters of galaxies should con- tain very large populations of relativistic electrons and ions. Electrons 2 with Lorentz factors γ 300 (energies E = γmec 150 MeV) are expected to be particularly∼ common. Observations and∼ models for the radio, extreme ultraviolet, hard X-ray, and gamma-ray emission from nonthermal particles accelerated in these mergers are described.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 566, A68 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322450 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Mass, velocity anisotropy, and pseudo phase-space density profiles of Abell 2142 E. Munari1,A.Biviano2,3, and G. A. Mamon3 1 Astronomy Unit, Department of Physics, University of Trieste, via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 3 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (UMR 7095: CNRS & UPMC), 98 bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] Received 6 August 2013 / Accepted 12 April 2014 ABSTRACT Aims. We aim to compute the mass and velocity anisotropy profiles of Abell 2142 and, from there, the pseudo phase–space density profile Q(r) and the density slope − velocity anisotropy β − γ relation, and then to compare them with theoretical expectations. Methods. The mass profiles were obtained by using three techniques based on member galaxy kinematics, namely the caustic method, the method of dispersion-kurtosis, and MAMPOSSt. Through the inversion of the Jeans equation, it was possible to compute the velocity anisotropy profiles. Results. The mass profiles, as well as the virial values of mass and radius, computed with the different techniques agree with one another and with the estimates coming from X-ray and weak lensing studies. A combined mass profile is obtained by averaging the lensing, X-ray, and kinematics determinations. The cluster mass profile is well fitted by an NFW profile with c = 4.0 ± 0.5. The population of red and blue galaxies appear to have a different velocity anisotropy configuration, since red galaxies are almost isotropic, while blue galaxies are radially anisotropic, with a weak dependence on radius.
    [Show full text]
  • The XMM Cluster Outskirts Project (X-COP): Physical Conditions of Abell 2142 up to the Virial Radius C
    A&A 595, A42 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628183 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics The XMM Cluster Outskirts Project (X-COP): Physical conditions of Abell 2142 up to the virial radius C. Tchernin1; 2, D. Eckert2; 3, S. Ettori4; 5, E. Pointecouteau6; 11, S. Paltani2, S. Molendi3, G. Hurier7; 12, F. Gastaldello3; 8, E. T. Lau9, D. Nagai9, M. Roncarelli4, and M. Rossetti10; 3 1 Center for Astronomy, Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, Heidelberg University, Philosophenweg 12, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d’Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland 3 INAF–IASF-Milano, via E. Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy 4 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy 5 INFN, Sezione di Bologna, viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy 6 CNRS, IRAP, 9 Av. colonel Roche, BP 44346, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, France 7 Centro de Estudios de Fisica del Cosmos de Aragon, Plaza San Juan 1, Planta-2, 44001 Teruel, Spain 8 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California at Irvine, 4129 Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-4575, USA 9 Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 10 Università degli studi di Milano, Dip. di Fisica, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy 11 Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, 38000 Toulouse, France 12 Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, CNRS, UMR8617, Université Paris-Sud 11, Batiment 121, Orsay, France Received 25 January 2016 / Accepted 17 June 2016 ABSTRACT Context. Galaxy clusters are continuously growing through the accretion of matter in their outskirts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of Zeldovich Pancakes
    A Catalogue of Zeldovich Pancakes Mikkel O. Lindholmer Supervisor: Steen H. Hansen Master’s thesis, submitted on October 18, 2015 Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract Using the standard cold dark matter model ΛCDM, it is predicted that there will be small fluctuations in the primordial energy density. These fluctuations are expected to lead to a cosmic web [1] under the influence of gravity and time. This web will consist of dense galaxy clusters interlinked by less dense two-dimensional walls, so called Zeldovich pancakes [2], and one-dimensional filaments. Galaxy clusters and filaments have been observed for a long time, but only recently have Zeldovich pancakes been observed outside of simulations [6]. The reason these have only recently been observed is because they are much less dense than filaments and clusters, to the point of being hard to differentiate from the average density of their environs [4,5]. Using the method we invented in Falco et. al [6] to find 2 pancakes as a basis, I create a fully automatic program capable of finding pancakes without human input, in galaxy cluster widely different from each other. I apply this program to the Abell galaxy clusters and using the SDSS catalogue I check for potential pancakes in the galaxy clusters. While most of the cluster are contained in the SDSS many of the clusters are only partially covered. I try to make the program compensate for this and manage to create the first catalogue of Zeldovich pancakes by finding 197 of them in 113 different clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Structures and Components in Galaxy Clusters: Observations and Models
    SSRv manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Structures and components in galaxy clusters: observations and models A.M. Bykov · E.M. Churazov · C. Ferrari · W.R. Forman · J.S. Kaastra · U. Klein · M. Markevitch · J. de Plaa Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract Clusters of galaxies are the largest gravitationally bounded struc- tures in the Universe dominated by dark matter. We review the observa- tional appearance and physical models of plasma structures in clusters of A.M. Bykov Ioffe Institute, 194021, St. Petersburg, Russia E-mail: [email protected]ffe.ru E.M. Churazov Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85741 Garching, Germany; Space Research Institute (IKI), Profsoyuznaya 84/32, Moscow 117997, Russia E-mail: [email protected] C. Ferrari Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Universit´ede Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Ob- servatoire de la C^oted'Azur E-mail: [email protected] W.R. Forman Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA E-mail: [email protected] J.S. Kaastra SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] U. Klein Argelander-Institut f¨urAstronomie, University of Bonn, Germany E-mail: [email protected] M. Markevitch Astrophysics Science Division, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA E-mail: [email protected] J. de Plaa SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, arXiv:1512.01456v1 [astro-ph.CO] 4 Dec 2015 The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 2 galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete X-Ray Sample of the High Latitude Sky from HEAO-1 A-2: Log N
    N O T I C E THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE Nr%W% Technical Memora►idum 82168 ^V A Complete X-Ray Sample of the High Latitude (W > 20 0 )Sky from HEAD -1 A-2: Log N - Log S and Luminosity Functions G. Piccinotti, R. F. Mushotzky, E.A. Boldt, S. S. Holt F. E. Marshall, P. J. Serlemitsos and R. A. Shafer (NASA-TH- 82168) A COMPLETE X-RAY SAMPLE OF N82-18787 THE HIGH LATITUDE SKY FROM HERO-1 A-2: log N 10 S AND LUMINOSITY FUNCTIONS (NASA) 51 p HC A04/MF A01 CSCL 04A Unclas G3/46 13871 c AUGUST 1981 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Godord Spne FUpht Gunter ^ftla^'t^82 20771 0 SA PJ/SA Technical Memorandum 82168 4 A Complete X-Ray Sample of the High Latitude (IbI > 200 )Sky from HEAO -1 A,-2: Log N -Log S and Luminosity Functions GI. Piccinotti, R. F. Mushotzky, E.A. Soldt, S. S. Holt F. E. Marshall, P. J. Serlemitsos and R. A. Shafer AUGUST 1981 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddrd Spa* FIipht center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 I A COMPLETE X-RAY SAMPLIC OF THE NIGH LATITUDE (I b l > 20 0 ) SKY FROM HShOP- 1 A-2t LOG N LOG S AND LUMINOSITY FUNCTIONS G. Piccinottil , R.F. Mushotsky, E.A• Boldt, S.S. Holt, F.E. Marshall, P.J. Serlemitsos and R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • June 19, 2008 19:16 WSPC/Guidelines-MPLA 02808
    June 19, 2008 19:16 WSPC/Guidelines-MPLA 02808 Modern Physics Letters A Vol. 23, Nos. 17{20 (2008) 1675{1686 c World Scientific Publishing Company AMIBA: FIRST-YEAR RESULTS FOR SUNYAEV-ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT JIUN-HUEI PROTY WU, TZI-HONG CHIUEH, CHI-WEI HUANG, YAO-WEI LIAO, FU-CHENG WANG Physics Department, National Taiwan University No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan [email protected] PABLO ALTIMIRANO, CHA-HAO CHANG, SU-HAO CHANG, SU-WEI CHANG, MING-TANG CHEN, GUILLAUME CHEREAU, CHIH-CHIANG HAN, PAUL T. P. HO, YAO-DE HUANG, YUH-JING HWANG, HOMIN JIANG, PATRICK KOCH, DEREK KUBO, CHAO-TE LI, KAI-YANG LIN, GUO-CHIN LIU, PIERRE MARTIN-COCHER, SANDOR MOLNAR, HIROAKI NISHIOKA, PHILIPPE RAFFIN, KEIICHI UMETSU Academia Sinica, Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, P.O.Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan MICHAEL KESTEVEN, WARWICK WILSON Australia Telescope National Facility, P.O.Box 76, Epping NSW 1710, Australia MARK BIRKINSHAW, KATY LANCASTER University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS6 5BX, U.K. We discuss the observation, analysis, and results of the first-year science operation of AMiBA, an interferometric experiment designed to study cosmology via the measure- ment of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). In 2007, we successfully observed 6 galaxy clusters (z < 0:33) through the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect. AMiBA is the first CMB interferometer operating at 86{102 GHz, currently with 7 close-packed antennas of 60 cm in diameter giving a synthesized resolution of around 6 arcminutes. An observ- ing strategy with on-off-source modulation is used to remove the effects from electronic offset and ground pickup.
    [Show full text]
  • Metallicity Gradients in the Intracluster Gas of Abell 496
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Metallicity Gradients in the Intracluster Gas of Abell 496 Renato A. Dupke & Raymond E. White III Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0324 ABSTRACT Analysis of spatially resolved ASCA spectra of the intracluster gas in Abell 496 confirms there are mild metal abundance enhancements near the center, as previously found by White et al. (1994) in a joint analysis of Ginga LAC and Einstein SSS spectra. Simultaneous analysis of spectra from all ASCA instruments (SIS + GIS) shows that the iron abundance is 0:36 0:03 solar ± 3 120 from the center of the cluster and rises 50% to 0:53 0:04 solar within − ∼ ± the central 20. Nickel and sulfur abundances are also centrally enhanced. We use a variety of elemental abundance ratios to assess the relative contribution of SN Ia and SN II to the metal enrichment of the intracluster gas. We find marginal evidence of gradients in some abundance ratios, which indicate that the fraction of iron from SN Ia increases toward the cluster center. We estimate that SN Ia account for 46% of the iron mass 3 120 from the center and 72% ∼ − ∼ within 20. The increased proportion of SN Ia ejecta at the center is such that the central iron abundance enhancement can be attributed wholly to SN Ia; we find no significant gradient in SN II ejecta. We argue that the additional SN Ia ejecta near the center is the vestige of a secondary wind phase driven by SN Ia (following a more vigorous protogalactic wind driven by SN II), which was partially smothered in the cD due to its location at the cluster center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kinematics of Cluster Galaxies Via Velocity Dispersion Profiles
    MNRAS 000,1{16 (2018) Preprint 31 August 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 The Kinematics of Cluster Galaxies via Velocity Dispersion Profiles Lawrence E. Bilton1? and Kevin A. Pimbblet,1 1E.A. Milne Centre for Astrophysics, The University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston upon Hull, HU6 7RX, UK Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT We present an analysis of the kinematics of a sample of 14 galaxy clusters via velocity dispersion profiles (VDPs), compiled using cluster parameters defined within the X- Ray Galaxy Clusters Database (BAX) cross-matched with data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We determine the presence of substructure in the clusters from the sample as a proxy for recent core mergers, resulting in 4 merging and 10 non- merging clusters to allow for comparison between their respective dynamical states. We create VDPs for our samples and divide them by mass, colour and morphology to assess how their kinematics respond to the environment. To improve the signal- to-noise ratio our galaxy clusters are normalised and co-added to a projected cluster radius at 0:0 − 2:5 r200. We find merging cluster environments possess an abundance of a kinematically-active (rising VDP) mix of red and blue elliptical galaxies, which is indicative of infalling substructures responsible for pre-processing galaxies. Compar- atively, in non-merging cluster environments galaxies generally decline in kinematic activity as a function of increasing radius, with bluer galaxies possessing the highest velocities, likely as a result of fast infalling field galaxies. However, the variance in kine- matic activity between blue and red cluster galaxies across merging and non-merging cluster environments suggests galaxies exhibit differing modes of galaxy accretion onto a cluster potential as a function of the presence of a core merger.
    [Show full text]
  • A Giant Sloshing Cold Front in Abell 2142 (+Bonus)
    A giant sloshing cold front in Abell 2142 (+Bonus) Dominique Eckert Department of Astronomy, University of Geneva Collaborators: Mariachiara Rossetti, Sabrina De Grandi, Fabio Gastaldello, Simona Ghizzardi, Elke Roediger, Silvano Molendi, Larry Rudnick, Damon Farnsworth D. Eckert January 15, 2013 The case of Abell 2142 A2142 (z=0.09): first cluster where CFs have been observed (Markevitch et al. 2000) Markevitch & Vikhlinin 2007 D. Eckert January 15, 2013 Tittley & Henriksen (2005) classify the CFs in A2142 as sloshing ! Owers et al. 2011 ... However this interpretation is hard to reconcile with the galaxy velocity distribution The riddle of the dynamical state In the discovery paper M00 interpreted A2142 as a merging cluster and the CFs as remnant cores D. Eckert January 15, 2013 Tittley & Henriksen (2005) classify the CFs in A2142 as sloshing ! MINOR MERGERS IN A2142 AND RXJ1720 9 The riddle of the dynamical state Figure 4. Phase space diagrams used for defining cluster membership forA2142(left panel)andRXJ1720(right panel). The red curves show the cluster limits in phase-space and are determined from the cluster mass profile (see the text for a description). Black crosses In the discoveryshow paper cluster membersM00 interpreted which lie on the red A2142 sequence, as while a mergingbluestarswithinthephasespacelimitsshowthoseclustermemb cluster ers which lie blueward of the red sequence. Red boxes show fore- and background galaxies. Red boxes filled with blue stars show non-members which and the CFs asare remnant bluer than the cores cluster red sequence. Owers et al. 2011 ... However this interpretation is hard to reconcile with the galaxy velocity distribution D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gemini/HST Galaxy Cluster Project: Stellar Populations in The
    Draft version October 3, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 THE GEMINI/HST GALAXY CLUSTER PROJECT: STELLAR POPULATIONS IN THE LOW REDSHIFT REFERENCE CLUSTER GALAXIES Inger Jørgensen,1 Kristin Chiboucas,1 Kristi Webb,2,3 and Charity Woodrum4,5 1Gemini Observatory, 670 N. A‘ohoku Pl., Hilo, HI 96720, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 5C2, Canada 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W. Waterloo, Ontario, ON N2L 3G1, Canada 4Department of Physics, 1274 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA 5Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA (Dated: Accepted for publlication September 26, 2018) Submitted to Astronomical Journal ABSTRACT In order to study stellar populations and galaxy structures at intermediate and high redshift (z =0.2 − 2.0) and link these properties to those of low redshift galaxies, there is a need for well-defined local reference samples. Especially for galaxies in massive clusters, such samples are often limited to the Coma cluster galaxies. We present consistently calibrated velocity dispersions and absorption line indices for galaxies in the central 2 R500 × 2 R500 of four massive clusters at z < 0.1: Abell 426/Perseus, Abell 1656/Coma, Abell 2029, and Abell 2142. The measurements are based on data from Gemini Observatory, McDonald Observatory, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. For bulge-dominated galaxies the samples are 95% complete in Perseus and Coma, and 74% complete in A2029 and A2142, to a limit of MB,abs ≤−18.5 mag.
    [Show full text]