INVESTIGATING ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI with LOW FREQUENCY RADIO OBSERVATIONS By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INVESTIGATING ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI with LOW FREQUENCY RADIO OBSERVATIONS By INVESTIGATING ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI WITH LOW FREQUENCY RADIO OBSERVATIONS by MATTHEW LAZELL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Physics & Astronomy College of Engineering and Physical Sciences The University of Birmingham March 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Low frequency radio astronomy allows us to look at some of the fainter and older synchrotron emission from the relativistic plasma associated with active galactic nuclei in galaxies and clusters. In this thesis, we use the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope to explore the impact that active galactic nuclei have on their surroundings. We present deep, high quality, 150–610 MHz radio observations for a sample of fifteen predominantly cool-core galaxy clusters. We in- vestigate a selection of these in detail, uncovering interesting radio features and using our multi-frequency data to derive various radio properties. For well-known clusters such as MS0735, our low noise images enable us to see in improved detail the radio lobes working against the intracluster medium, whilst deriving the energies and timescales of this event. Our excellent field of view allowed us to explore the point-source like radio AGN for a subsample of our clusters. We used additional optical and infra-red data to identify cluster members, remove radio contamination from star forming galaxies, and thus investigate the energetics of the many cluster galaxies. We find that low mass radio-loud AGN can easily quench the star formation at their core, and possibly enough to eject the gas from the system given some assumptions. We compare our observations with the results of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations (cosmo-OWLS), and explore the mechanical and binding energy levels over a large range of galaxy masses. We look at the radio powers of our sample and compare these to the published X-ray cavity powers. We find an improved relation from our integrated luminosities, allowing a more accurate estimation of jet powers when X-ray or radio observations are unavailable. The question of what radio jets are made of is still an unknown variable in AGN physics today. Our observations rule out a relativistic electron/positron plasma, we find that a heavier solution is required. Our deepest low-frequency radio observations of these well-known clusters will yield valuable information about the nature of feedback when combined with X-ray observations of comparable depth. We present results from such combined work in this thesis. Acknowledgements Family Friends Dr. Somak Raychaudhury Prof. Trevor Ponman Dr. Ian Stevens Prof. Matt Jarvis David Stops Dr. Ian McCarthy Dr. Chris Haines Dr. Ishwara Chandra Dr. Ewan O’Sullivan, Dr. Alastair Sanderson, Dr. Samuel George Contents 1 Radio galaxies in clusters 1 1.1 What causes radio emission? ............................ 1 1.1.1 Synchrotron radiation ........................... 2 1.1.2 What causes radio emission in galaxies? ................. 4 1.2 Active galactic nuclei ................................ 4 1.2.1 Basic model of extragalactic radio sources ................ 5 1.2.2 Radio source structures .......................... 5 1.3 Galaxy formation and evolution .......................... 7 1.3.1 Estimating black hole masses ....................... 8 1.3.2 Black hole scaling relations ........................ 10 1.4 Clusters of galaxies ................................. 12 1.4.1 Cool-cores and non-cool-cores ...................... 13 1.4.2 AGN feedback ................................ 14 1.4.3 AGN feedback modes ............................ 16 1.4.4 Environmental effects ........................... 20 1.5 Sample selection ................................... 21 2 Principles of imaging with radio telescopes 23 2.1 Detecting radio waves ................................ 23 2.2 Interferometric imaging ............................... 24 2.3 Sensitivity & uv–coverage ............................. 29 CONTENTS iii 2.4 The GMRT ...................................... 29 2.5 Radio frequency interference ............................ 34 2.6 Data Reduction ................................... 37 2.6.1 Preparation ................................. 37 2.6.2 Flagging & calibration ........................... 38 2.6.3 Imaging ................................... 43 2.6.4 Self-calibration ............................... 45 2.7 Stripe removal .................................... 47 2.8 Wide-field imaging ................................. 50 3 The energetics of the radio AGN population in clusters 52 3.1 Introduction ..................................... 52 3.2 GMRT Radio Observations & Reduction ...................... 54 3.2.1 Observations ................................ 54 3.2.2 Reduction .................................. 55 3.3 The source catalogue ................................ 57 3.3.1 Source extraction .............................. 57 3.3.2 Catalogue cross-correlation and matching ................ 58 3.3.3 Comparison with other radio catalogues ................. 61 3.4 Galaxy properties .................................. 63 3.4.1 LoCuSS ................................... 63 3.4.2 Star formation rates ............................ 64 3.4.3 X-ray data .................................. 66 3.4.4 Stellar masses ................................ 66 3.4.5 Binding energies .............................. 67 3.4.6 Radio analysis ................................ 68 3.4.7 Removing contamination from star-forming galaxy radio emission .. 68 3.4.8 Final AGN radio luminosities ....................... 73 3.5 Radio AGN in the galaxy population ........................ 75 CONTENTS iv 3.5.1 The radio-loud AGN fraction ....................... 75 3.5.2 The heating power of AGN ........................ 84 3.5.3 cosmo-OWLS simulations ......................... 85 3.5.4 Gas ejection by radio galaxies ....................... 88 3.5.5 Heating vs cooling for galaxies ...................... 95 3.6 Conclusions and further work ........................... 97 3.7 Radio AGN and their environment ......................... 100 3.7.1 Radio fraction as a function of its environment ............. 100 3.7.2 Heating vs cooling for clusters ...................... 101 4 The interaction between AGN and the intracluster medium 111 4.1 Cluster energetics .................................. 112 4.2 Spectral ageing .................................... 121 4.3 Radio lobe composition ............................... 125 4.4 Conclusions and further work ........................... 128 5 Low-frequency observations of radio galaxies in rich clusters 130 5.1 2A0335+096 ..................................... 130 5.2 MS0735.6+7421 .................................... 136 5.3 Hydra A ....................................... 147 5.4 Abell 2052 ...................................... 151 5.5 Abell 2218 ...................................... 154 5.6 Hercules A ...................................... 159 5.7 RXJ1720.1+2638 ................................... 162 5.7.1 SDSS J172027.49+263158.7 ......................... 164 5.7.2 SDSS J172107.89+262432.1 ......................... 169 5.8 A brief description of the other cluster observations ............... 172 5.8.1 Abell 478 .................................. 172 5.8.2 RBS797 .................................... 172 LIST OF REFERENCES v 5.8.3 Abell 1795 .................................. 175 5.8.4 Abell 1835 .................................. 175 5.8.5 Abell 2029 .................................. 177 5.8.6 Abell 2597 .................................. 177 6 Conclusions & further work 178 A Synchrotron model fits 181 List of References 192 List of Figures 1.1 Synchrotron emission spectrum .......................... 3 1.2 Images of an FR-I & FR-II source .......................... 7 1.3 Measuring the motion of stars near the galactic centre .............. 9 1.4 M–σ plots ...................................... 11 1.5 The cool-core/non-cool-core cluster bimodality. ................. 15 2.1 The u v w imaging geometry. .......................... 27 ( , , ) 2.2 Using many antennae to make up a large array. ................. 28 2.3 uv–coverage of a 10 minute snapshot of MS0735. ................ 30 2.4 uv–coverage of a 6 hour observation of MS0735. ................. 31 2.5 The GMRT array configuration. .......................... 33 2.6 One of the GMRT dishes in the central square. .................. 35 2.7 The GMRT radio frequency spectrum from 0–500 MHz. ............. 36 2.8 Output from the u�ℐu�u� tool listr ......................... 38 2.9 The tvflg tool .................................... 39 2.10 snplt: phase ..................................... 40 2.11 snplt: amplitude .................................. 40 2.12 Bandpass plot of MS0735 .............................. 41 2.13 Flagging RFI with tvflg .............................. 42 2.14 imagr in interactive mode. ............................. 46 2.15 The snplt after self-calibration ........................... 48 LIST OF FIGURES
Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1903.02002V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 5 Mar 2019
    Draft version March 7, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey Dan Coe,1 Brett Salmon,1 Maruˇsa Bradacˇ,2 Larry D. Bradley,1 Keren Sharon,3 Adi Zitrin,4 Ana Acebron,4 Catherine Cerny,5 Nathalia´ Cibirka,4 Victoria Strait,2 Rachel Paterno-Mahler,3 Guillaume Mahler,3 Roberto J. Avila,1 Sara Ogaz,1 Kuang-Han Huang,2 Debora Pelliccia,2, 6 Daniel P. Stark,7 Ramesh Mainali,7 Pascal A. Oesch,8 Michele Trenti,9, 10 Daniela Carrasco,9 William A. Dawson,11 Steven A. Rodney,12 Louis-Gregory Strolger,1 Adam G. Riess,1 Christine Jones,13 Brenda L. Frye,7 Nicole G. Czakon,14 Keiichi Umetsu,14 Benedetta Vulcani,15 Or Graur,13, 16, 17 Saurabh W. Jha,18 Melissa L. Graham,19 Alberto Molino,20, 21 Mario Nonino,22 Jens Hjorth,23 Jonatan Selsing,24, 25 Lise Christensen,23 Shotaro Kikuchihara,26, 27 Masami Ouchi,26, 28 Masamune Oguri,29, 30, 28 Brian Welch,31 Brian C. Lemaux,2 Felipe Andrade-Santos,13 Austin T. Hoag,2 Traci L. Johnson,32 Avery Peterson,32 Matthew Past,32 Carter Fox,3 Irene Agulli,4 Rachael Livermore,9, 10 Russell E. Ryan,1 Daniel Lam,33 Irene Sendra-Server,34 Sune Toft,24, 25 Lorenzo Lovisari,13 and Yuanyuan Su13 1Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 2Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA 3Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 1085 South University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 4Physics Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLICATIONS Publications (As of Dec 2020): 335 on Refereed Journals, 90 Selected from Non-Refereed Journals. Citations From
    PUBLICATIONS Publications (as of Sep 2021): 350 on refereed journals, 92 selected from non-refereed journals. Citations from ADS: 32263, H-index= 97. Refereed 350. Caminha, G.B.; Suyu, S.H.; Grillo, C.; Rosati, P.; et al. 2021 Galaxy cluster strong lensing cosmography: cosmological constraints from a sample of regular galaxy clusters, submitted to A&A 349. Mercurio, A..; Rosati, P., Biviano, A. et al. 2021 CLASH-VLT: Abell S1063. Cluster assembly history and spectroscopic catalogue, submitted to A&A, (arXiv:2109.03305) 348. G. Granata et al. (9 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 Improved strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters using the Fundamental Plane: the case of Abell S1063, submitted to A&A, (arXiv:2107.09079) 347. E. Vanzella et al. (19 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 High star cluster formation efficiency in the strongly lensed Sunburst Lyman-continuum galaxy at z = 2:37, submitted to A&A, (arXiv:2106.10280) 346. M.G. Paillalef et al. (9 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 Ionized gas kinematics of cluster AGN at z ∼ 0:8 with KMOS, MNRAS, 506, 385 6 crediti 345. M. Scalco et al. (12 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 The HST large programme on Centauri - IV. Catalogue of two external fields, MNRAS, 505, 3549 344. P. Rosati et al. 2021 Synergies of THESEUS with the large facilities of the 2030s and guest observer opportunities, Experimental Astronomy, 2021ExA...tmp...79R (arXiv:2104.09535) 343. N.R. Tanvir et al. (33 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 Exploration of the high-redshift universe enabled by THESEUS, Experimental Astronomy, 2021ExA...tmp...97T (arXiv:2104.09532) 342.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DISTRIBUTION of ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI in CLUSTERS of GALAXIES ABSTRACT We Present a Study of the Distribution of AGN In
    APJ ACCEPTED [18 APRIL 2007] Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/14/05 THE DISTRIBUTION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES PAUL MARTINI Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, [email protected] JOHN S. MULCHAEY, DANIEL D. KELSON Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101-1292 ApJ accepted [18 April 2007] ABSTRACT We present a study of the distribution of AGN in clusters of galaxies with a uniformly selected, spectroscop- ically complete sample of 35 AGN in eight clusters of galaxies at z = 0:06 ! 0:31. We find that the 12 AGN 42 −1 with LX > 10 erg s in cluster members more luminous than a rest-frame MR < −20 mag are more centrally concentrated than typical cluster galaxies of this luminosity, although these AGN have comparable velocity and substructure distributions to other cluster members. In contrast, a larger sample of 30 cluster AGN with 41 −1 LX > 10 erg s do not show evidence for greater central concentration than inactive cluster members, nor evidence for a different kinematic or substructure distribution. As we do see clear differences in the spatial and kinematic distributions of the blue Butcher-Oemler and red cluster galaxy populations, any difference in the AGN and inactive galaxy population must be less distinct than that between these two pairs of popula- tions. Comparison of the AGN fraction selected via X-ray emission in this study to similarly-selected AGN in the field indicates that the AGN fraction is not significantly lower in clusters, contrary to AGN identified via visible-wavelength emission lines, but similar to the approximately constant radio-selected AGN fraction in clusters and the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Observations of the Merging Galaxy Cluster Abell 520 D
    A&A 622, A20 (2019) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833900 & c ESO 2019 Astrophysics LOFAR Surveys: a new window on the Universe Special issue Radio observations of the merging galaxy cluster Abell 520 D. N. Hoang1, T. W. Shimwell2,1, R. J. van Weeren1, G. Brunetti3, H. J. A. Röttgering1, F. Andrade-Santos4, A. Botteon3,5, M. Brüggen6, R. Cassano3, A. Drabent7, F. de Gasperin6, M. Hoeft7, H. T. Intema1, D. A. Rafferty6, A. Shweta8, and A. Stroe9 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (ASTRON), PO Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands 3 INAF-Istituto di Radioastronomia, via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy 4 Harvard-Smithsonian for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 5 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, via P. Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, Italy 6 Hamburger Sternwarte, University of Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany 7 Thüringer Landessternwarte, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany 8 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, India 9 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany Received 18 July 2018 / Accepted 10 September 2018 ABSTRACT Context. Extended synchrotron radio sources are often observed in merging galaxy clusters. Studies of the extended emission help us to understand the mechanisms in which the radio emitting particles gain their relativistic energies. Aims. We examine the possible acceleration mechanisms of the relativistic particles that are responsible for the extended radio emis- sion in the merging galaxy cluster Abell 520.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1811.05004V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 19 Dec 2018 2 the Atmospheric Cooling
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Hot Atmospheres, Cold Gas, AGN Feedback and the Evolution of Early Type Galaxies: a Topical Perspective N. Werner · B. R. McNamara · E. Churazov · E. Scannapieco Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract Most galaxies comparable to or larger than the mass of the Milky Way host hot, X-ray emitting atmospheres, and many such galaxies are radio sources. Hot atmospheres and radio jets and lobes are the ingredients of radio- mechanical active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback. While a consensus has emerged that such feedback suppresses cooling of hot cluster atmospheres, less attention has been paid to massive galaxies where similar mechanisms are at play. Observation indicates that the atmospheres of elliptical and S0 galaxies were accreted externally during the process of galaxy assembly and augmented significantly by stellar mass loss. Their atmospheres have entropy and cooling time profiles that are remarkably similar to those of central cluster galaxies. About half display filamentary or disky nebulae of cool and cold gas, much of which has likely cooled from the hot atmospheres. We review the observational and theoretical perspectives on thermal instabilities in galactic atmospheres and the evidence that AGN heating is able to roughly balance N. Werner MTA-E¨otv¨osUniversity Lend¨uletHot Universe and Astrophysics Research Group, P´azm´any P´eters´et´any 1/A, Budapest, 1117, Hungary Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk Univer- sity, Kotl´aˇrsk´a2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic School of Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan E-mail: [email protected] B.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging Non-Thermal X-Ray Emission from Galaxy Clusters: Results and Implications
    Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society 37: 299 » 305, 2004 IMAGING NON-THERMAL X-RAY EMISSION FROM GALAXY CLUSTERS: RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS Mark Henriksen and Danny Hudson Joint Center for Astrophysics, Physics Department, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT We ¯nd evidence of a hard X-ray excess above the thermal emission in two cool clusters (Abell 1750 and IC 1262) and a soft excess in two hot clusters (Abell 754 and Abell 2163). Our modeling shows that the excess components in Abell 1750, IC 1262, and Abell 2163 are best ¯t by a steep powerlaw indicative of a signi¯cant non-thermal component. In the case of Abell 754, the excess emission is thermal, 1 keV emission. We analyze the dynamical state of each cluster and ¯nd evidence of an ongoing or recent merger in all four clusters. In the case of Abell 2163, the detected, steep spectrum, non-thermal X-ray emission is shown to be associated with the weak merger shock seen in the temperature map. However, this shock is not able to produce the flatter spectrum radio halo which we attribute to post- shock turbulence. In Abell 1750 and IC 1262, the shocked gas appears to be spatially correlated with non-thermal emission suggesting cosmic-ray acceleration at the shock front. Key words : clusters of galaxies { inverse-Compton emission { mergers I. INTRODUCTION with energy. For example, the e®ective area of the Bep- poSax PDS (15 - 300 keV) is 10 times lower than the Inverse-Compton measurements for galaxy clusters RXTE PCA (2 - 60 Kev).
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional Scientific Programme
    Galaxy Clusters as Giant Cosmic Laboratories – Programme Monday, 21 May 2012 09:00 Registration 09:50 Schartel: Opening Remarks Session I Dynamical and Thermal Structure of Galaxy Clusters and their ICM Chair: Birzan 10:00 Sanders: The thermal and dynamical state of cluster cores 10:30 Ohashi: X-ray study of clusters at the outer edge and beyond 10:45 Eckert: The gas distribution in galaxy cluster outer regions 11:00 Molendi: Extending measures of the ICM to the outskirts: facts, myths and puzzles 11:15 Sato: Temperature, entropy, and mass profiles to the virial radius of galaxy clusters with Suzaku 11:30- Coffee Break & Poster Viewing 12:00 Session II Dynamical and Thermal Structure of Galaxy Clusters and their ICM Chair: Altieri Cluster Mass Determination 12:00 Ettori: Cluster mass profiles from X-ray observations: present constraints and limitations 12:30 Russell: Shock fronts, electron-ion equilibration and ICM transport processes in the merging cluster Abell 2146 12:45 ZuHone: Probing the Microphysics of the Intracluster Medium with Cold Fronts in the ICM 13:00 Rossetti: Challenging the merging/sloshing cold front paradigm with a new XMM observation of A2142 13:15 Nevalainen: Bulk motion measurements in clusters of galaxies using XMM-Newton and ATHENA 13:30- Lunch 15:00 Session III Dynamical and Thermal Structure of Galaxy Clusters and their ICM Chair: de Grandi Cluster Mass Determination 15:00 Mahdavi: Multiwavelength Constraints on Scaling Relations and Substructure in a Sample of 50 Clusters of Galaxies 15:30 Pratt: Galaxy cluster
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the PHYSICS of CLUSTER MERGERS
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server To appear in Merging Processes in Clusters of Galaxies, edited by L. Feretti, I. M. Gioia, and G. Giovannini (Dordrecht: Kluwer), in press (2001) Chapter 1 THE PHYSICS OF CLUSTER MERGERS Craig L. Sarazin Department of Astronomy University of Virginia [email protected] Abstract Clusters of galaxies generally form by the gravitational merger of smaller clusters and groups. Major cluster mergers are the most energetic events in the Universe since the Big Bang. Some of the basic physical proper- ties of mergers will be discussed, with an emphasis on simple analytic arguments rather than numerical simulations. Semi-analytic estimates of merger rates are reviewed, and a simple treatment of the kinematics of binary mergers is given. Mergers drive shocks into the intracluster medium, and these shocks heat the gas and should also accelerate non- thermal relativistic particles. X-ray observations of shocks can be used to determine the geometry and kinematics of the merger. Many clus- ters contain cooling flow cores; the hydrodynamical interactions of these cores with the hotter, less dense gas during mergers are discussed. As a result of particle acceleration in shocks, clusters of galaxies should con- tain very large populations of relativistic electrons and ions. Electrons 2 with Lorentz factors γ 300 (energies E = γmec 150 MeV) are expected to be particularly∼ common. Observations and∼ models for the radio, extreme ultraviolet, hard X-ray, and gamma-ray emission from nonthermal particles accelerated in these mergers are described.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Scientific Programme 10.1
    10. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME 10.1. OVERVIEW (a) Invited Discourses Plenary Hall B 18:00-19:30 ID1 “The Zoo of Galaxies” Karen Masters, University of Portsmouth, UK Monday, 20 August ID2 “Supernovae, the Accelerating Cosmos, and Dark Energy” Brian Schmidt, ANU, Australia Wednesday, 22 August ID3 “The Herschel View of Star Formation” Philippe André, CEA Saclay, France Wednesday, 29 August ID4 “Past, Present and Future of Chinese Astronomy” Cheng Fang, Nanjing University, China Nanjing Thursday, 30 August (b) Plenary Symposium Review Talks Plenary Hall B (B) 8:30-10:00 Or Rooms 309A+B (3) IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antarctica John Storey (3) Mon. 20 IAUS 289 The Cosmic Distance Scale: Past, Present and Future Wendy Freedman (3) Mon. 27 IAUS 290 Probing General Relativity using Accreting Black Holes Andy Fabian (B) Wed. 22 IAUS 291 Pulsars are Cool – seriously Scott Ransom (3) Thu. 23 Magnetars: neutron stars with magnetic storms Nanda Rea (3) Thu. 23 Probing Gravitation with Pulsars Michael Kremer (3) Thu. 23 IAUS 292 From Gas to Stars over Cosmic Time Mordacai-Mark Mac Low (B) Tue. 21 IAUS 293 The Kepler Mission: NASA’s ExoEarth Census Natalie Batalha (3) Tue. 28 IAUS 294 The Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Magnetism Bryan Gaensler (B) Wed. 29 IAUS 295 Black Holes in Galaxies John Kormendy (B) Thu. 30 (c) Symposia - Week 1 IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antartica IAUS 290 Accretion on all scales IAUS 291 Neutron Stars and Pulsars IAUS 292 Molecular gas, Dust, and Star Formation in Galaxies (d) Symposia –Week 2 IAUS 289 Advancing the Physics of Cosmic
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 566, A68 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322450 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Mass, velocity anisotropy, and pseudo phase-space density profiles of Abell 2142 E. Munari1,A.Biviano2,3, and G. A. Mamon3 1 Astronomy Unit, Department of Physics, University of Trieste, via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 3 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (UMR 7095: CNRS & UPMC), 98 bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] Received 6 August 2013 / Accepted 12 April 2014 ABSTRACT Aims. We aim to compute the mass and velocity anisotropy profiles of Abell 2142 and, from there, the pseudo phase–space density profile Q(r) and the density slope − velocity anisotropy β − γ relation, and then to compare them with theoretical expectations. Methods. The mass profiles were obtained by using three techniques based on member galaxy kinematics, namely the caustic method, the method of dispersion-kurtosis, and MAMPOSSt. Through the inversion of the Jeans equation, it was possible to compute the velocity anisotropy profiles. Results. The mass profiles, as well as the virial values of mass and radius, computed with the different techniques agree with one another and with the estimates coming from X-ray and weak lensing studies. A combined mass profile is obtained by averaging the lensing, X-ray, and kinematics determinations. The cluster mass profile is well fitted by an NFW profile with c = 4.0 ± 0.5. The population of red and blue galaxies appear to have a different velocity anisotropy configuration, since red galaxies are almost isotropic, while blue galaxies are radially anisotropic, with a weak dependence on radius.
    [Show full text]
  • The XMM Cluster Outskirts Project (X-COP): Physical Conditions of Abell 2142 up to the Virial Radius C
    A&A 595, A42 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628183 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics The XMM Cluster Outskirts Project (X-COP): Physical conditions of Abell 2142 up to the virial radius C. Tchernin1; 2, D. Eckert2; 3, S. Ettori4; 5, E. Pointecouteau6; 11, S. Paltani2, S. Molendi3, G. Hurier7; 12, F. Gastaldello3; 8, E. T. Lau9, D. Nagai9, M. Roncarelli4, and M. Rossetti10; 3 1 Center for Astronomy, Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, Heidelberg University, Philosophenweg 12, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d’Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland 3 INAF–IASF-Milano, via E. Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy 4 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy 5 INFN, Sezione di Bologna, viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy 6 CNRS, IRAP, 9 Av. colonel Roche, BP 44346, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, France 7 Centro de Estudios de Fisica del Cosmos de Aragon, Plaza San Juan 1, Planta-2, 44001 Teruel, Spain 8 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California at Irvine, 4129 Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-4575, USA 9 Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 10 Università degli studi di Milano, Dip. di Fisica, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy 11 Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, 38000 Toulouse, France 12 Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, CNRS, UMR8617, Université Paris-Sud 11, Batiment 121, Orsay, France Received 25 January 2016 / Accepted 17 June 2016 ABSTRACT Context. Galaxy clusters are continuously growing through the accretion of matter in their outskirts.
    [Show full text]
  • New Type of Black Hole Detected in Massive Collision That Sent Gravitational Waves with a 'Bang'
    New type of black hole detected in massive collision that sent gravitational waves with a 'bang' By Ashley Strickland, CNN Updated 1200 GMT (2000 HKT) September 2, 2020 &lt;img alt="Galaxy NGC 4485 collided with its larger galactic neighbor NGC 4490 millions of years ago, leading to the creation of new stars seen in the right side of the image." class="media__image" src="//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190516104725-ngc-4485-nasa-super-169.jpg"&gt; Photos: Wonders of the universe Galaxy NGC 4485 collided with its larger galactic neighbor NGC 4490 millions of years ago, leading to the creation of new stars seen in the right side of the image. Hide Caption 98 of 195 &lt;img alt="Astronomers developed a mosaic of the distant universe, called the Hubble Legacy Field, that documents 16 years of observations from the Hubble Space Telescope. The image contains 200,000 galaxies that stretch back through 13.3 billion years of time to just 500 million years after the Big Bang. " class="media__image" src="//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190502151952-0502-wonders-of-the-universe-super-169.jpg"&gt; Photos: Wonders of the universe Astronomers developed a mosaic of the distant universe, called the Hubble Legacy Field, that documents 16 years of observations from the Hubble Space Telescope. The image contains 200,000 galaxies that stretch back through 13.3 billion years of time to just 500 million years after the Big Bang. Hide Caption 99 of 195 &lt;img alt="A ground-based telescope&amp;amp;#39;s view of the Large Magellanic Cloud, a neighboring galaxy of our Milky Way.
    [Show full text]