DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on the U.S. Antarctic Program's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on the U.S. Antarctic Program's National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Advisory Committee Report of the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on the U.S. Antarctic Program’s Research Vessel Procurement August 14, 2019 Members Kim S. Bernard, Oregon State University Amy Leventer, Colgate University Jonathan Michael Prince, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, SJSU/CSU Randy Sliester, British Antarctic Survey James H. Swift, UCSD Scripps Institution of Oceanography (Chair) Tom Weingartner (member and OPP/AC liaison) Tim McGovern, National Science Foundation - OPP liaison PART I. Summary _____________________________________________________________________________________ 8 A. Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________________________ 8 B. Impetus and Approach __________________________________________________________________________ 14 B.1 Synopsis of Issues _____________________________________________________________________________________ 14 B.2 Subcommittee Charge and Scope of Activities ______________________________________________________ 15 B.3 General Approach _____________________________________________________________________________________ 16 B.4 Acknowledgements ___________________________________________________________________________________ 16 C. Relationship of the Analyses to Strategic Science and Logistics Planning ______________ 17 C.1 Strategic planning and future polar science initiatives _____________________________________________ 17 C.1.1 National Science Board 2020 Vision for the National Science Foundation (2005) ___________ 17 C.1.2 Advancing U.S. Polar Research Through the Acquisition of a New Polar Research Icebreaker, Antarctic Research Vessel Oversight Committee (2006) __________________________ 18 C.1.3 Future Science Opportunities in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. National Research Council (2011) ______________________________________________________________________________________ 18 C.1.4 Critical Infrastructure for Ocean Research and Societal Needs in 2030, National Research Council (2011) ______________________________________________________________________________________ 19 C.1.5 U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel, More and Better Science in Antarctica through Increased Logistical Effectiveness, July 2012. ____________________________________________________ 20 C.1.6 National Research Council, Sea Change: 2015-2025 Decadal Survey of Ocean Science (2015). ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 21 C.1.7 National Research Council (2015) A Strategic Vision for NSF Investments in Antarctic and Southern Ocean Research. __________________________________________________________________________ 22 C.2 Recommendations from previous US polar research vessel planning ____________________________ 23 C.2.1 Antarctic Research Vessel Oversight Committee Polar Research Icebreaker Study (2006) _ 23 C.2.2 A New U.S. Polar Research Vessel (PRV): Science Drivers and Vessel Requirements (2012) 25 C.2.3 Research Vessel Placement Program Vessel Studies Report (2018) ___________________________ 26 C.3 Polar research ships recently in service or under construction ___________________________________ 28 C.3.1 Statement of Requirements for the Procurement of the New Polar Research Vessel Sir David Attenborough (2015) ___________________________________________________________________ 28 C.3.2 RV Kronprins Haakon ______________________________________________________________________________ 30 C.3.3 Australian Antarctic science and resupply ship, RSV Nuyina ___________________________________ 31 C.3.4 Chinese polar research vessel, XueLong 2 ________________________________________________________ 33 PART II. Analysis, Discussion, and Detailed Recommendations _________________________ 35 D. USAP Polar Research Ship Science Mission Requirements ________________________________ 35 D.1 Overview _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 35 D.2 Science Mission Requirements, Updates ____________________________________________________________ 35 D.2.1 Size and general requirements ____________________________________________________________________ 36 D.2.2 Accommodations and habitability ________________________________________________________________ 38 D.2.2.1 Accommodations/Berths ___________________________________________________________________ 38 D.2.2.2 Habitability ___________________________________________________________________________________ 39 D.2.3 Operational characteristics _______________________________________________________________________ 43 D.2.3.1 Icebreaking ___________________________________________________________________________________ 43 D.2.3.2 Endurance & Range __________________________________________________________________________ 45 D.2.3.3 Speed _________________________________________________________________________________________ 46 D.2.3.4 Sea keeping ___________________________________________________________________________________ 47 D.2.3.5 Station keeping and dynamic positioning __________________________________________________ 51 D.2.3.6 Track line following _________________________________________________________________________ 53 D.2.3.7 Ship and winch control ______________________________________________________________________ 53 D.2.3.8 Underwater radiated noise _________________________________________________________________ 54 D.2.3.9 Helicopter support ___________________________________________________________________________ 56 D.2.3.10 Off Vessel Support for Field Work and Logistics __________________________________________ 59 OPP/AC RV Subcommittee Report - 2 - D.2.4 Over-the-side and weight handling _______________________________________________________________ 60 D.2.4.1 Over the side handling _______________________________________________________________________ 60 D.2.4.2 Winches & Wire ______________________________________________________________________________ 61 D.2.4.3 Cranes, Frames and Handling Devices ______________________________________________________ 65 D.2.4.4 Towing/Trawls/ice-clearing stern _________________________________________________________ 68 D.2.4.5 ROV support __________________________________________________________________________________ 69 D.2.4.6 Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) support _________________________________________________ 70 D.2.5 Science working spaces ____________________________________________________________________________ 72 D.2.5.1 Working deck area ___________________________________________________________________________ 72 D.2.5.2 Laboratories __________________________________________________________________________________ 74 D.2.5.2.1 Layout & construction ___________________________________________________________________ 77 D.2.5.2.2 Electrical __________________________________________________________________________________ 80 D.2.5.3 Vans ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 84 D.2.5.4 Storage ________________________________________________________________________________________ 86 D.2.5.5 Science load ___________________________________________________________________________________ 88 D.2.5.6 Workboats ____________________________________________________________________________________ 88 D.2.5.7 Masts __________________________________________________________________________________________ 90 D.2.5.8 Geotechnical Coring and Drilling ____________________________________________________________ 93 D.2.5.9 Moon pool operations ________________________________________________________________________ 96 D.2.5.10 On deck incubations _________________________________________________________________________ 97 D.2.5.11 Marine mammal & bird observations ______________________________________________________ 98 D.2.6 Science and shipboard systems ___________________________________________________________________ 99 D.2.6.1 Navigation ____________________________________________________________________________________ 99 D.2.6.2 Data network, onboard computing, and data processing _______________________________ 100 D.2.6.3 Real time data acquisition system ________________________________________________________ 103 D.2.6.4 Communications – internal ________________________________________________________________ 103 D.2.6.5 Communications – external _______________________________________________________________ 104 D.2.6.6 Scientific Seawater System ________________________________________________________________ 106 D.2.6.7 Acoustic systems (including deep and shallow multibeam, echosounder, sub- bottom profiling; ADCP) ___________________________________________________________________ 109 D.2.6.8 Seismics _____________________________________________________________________________________ 111 D.2.6.9 Project science system installation and power __________________________________________ 113 D.2.6.10 Discharges __________________________________________________________________________________ 115 D.2.7 Construction, operation & maintenance ________________________________________________________ 117 D.2.7.1 Green ship __________________________________________________________________________________ 117 D.2.7.2 ADA compliance ____________________________________________________________________________ 121 D.2.7.3 Maintainability _____________________________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EMB PP25 Research Vessels
    EUROPEAN Next generation Position Paper 25 MARINE BOARD European Research Vessels Next generation European Research Vessels Current status and Foreseeable Evolution Cover Photo: View from the L'Atalante afterdeck while the ship is maneuvering. The L'Atalante is a research vessel of the French oceanographic fleet operated by Ifremer. This operation named Cassiopée, took place in the Pacific Ocean in 2015. Credit: © Ifremer/Ird - N. Lamande European Marine Board IVZW Belgian Enterprise Number: 0650.608.890 Wandelaarkaai 7 I 8400 Ostend I Belgium Tel.: +32(0)59 34 01 63 I Fax: +32(0)59 34 01 65 E-mail: [email protected] www.marineboard.eu EMB_PP25_Research_Vessels_cover_11mm.indd 1-3 17/10/19 21:51 NEXT GENERATION EUROPEAN RESEARCH VESSELS European Marine Board The European Marine Board provides a pan-European platform for its member organizations to develop common priorities, to advance marine research, and to bridge the gap between science and policy in order to meet future marine science challenges and opportunities. The European Marine Board was established in 1995 to facilitate enhanced cooperation between European marine science organizations towards the development of a common vision on the strategic research priorities for marine science in Europe. Members are either major national marine or oceanographic institutes, research funding agencies, or national consortia of universities with a strong marine research focus. In 2019, the European Marine Board represents 33 Member Organizations from 18 countries. The Board provides the essential components for transferring knowledge for leadership in marine research in Europe. Adopting a strategic role, the European Marine Board serves its member organizations by providing a forum within which marine research policy advice to national agencies and to the European Commission is developed, with the objective of promoting the establishment of the European Research Area.
    [Show full text]
  • IRSO 2019 Agenda (Final V11)
    2019 IRSO 32nd Meeting Agenda - October 7-11, 2019 Host- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Hobart, Tasmania Meeting venue: Hotel Grand Chancellor, 1 Davey Street, Hobart Thursday 3rd October-2019 – Brisbane, Queensland, Optional Tour of RV Investigator – Ben Arthur (CSIRO) has emailed details to those of you who have indicated you will attend. Monday 7th October – Hobart Time Event Comments Topic - “From Paper to Platform” An overview of MFP Software 13:00 - 15:30 Workshop - Optional Workshop located at CSIRO, 3-4 Castray Esplanade Hobart A chance to catch up with other members 16:00 - 17:30 Pre-Registration & afternoon tea icebreaker Harbour View Mezzanine Level - Hotel Grand Chancellor Please be prompt 17:45 - 18:00 Bus departs Hotel Grand Chancellor Harbour View Mezzanine Level - Hotel Grand Chancellor Drinks and canapes provided 18:00 - 19:00 Welcome Reception – Government House Dress code - Suit or jacket and tie for men and smart dress/suit for women. 19:00 - 19:15 Bus returns to Hotel Grand Chancellor Free evening V11 Day1 IRSO Meeting –Tuesday 8th October-2019 Duration Time Theme Topic Owner Comments (Mins) 08:00 30 Registration Registration - Mezzanine Level – Grand Chancellor CSIRO 08:30 5 IRSO Day 1 - Welcome and admin matters Erica Koning/Greg Foothead 08:35 5 Welcome to Hobart - Introduction to hosts CSIRO - Toni Moate 08:40 15 Tasmanian Aboriginal Council Welcome to participants Toni Moate Opening of 32nd IRSO and 08:55 15 Round table introduction of participants All Business 09:10 5 Adoption
    [Show full text]
  • Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson Ship Specifications
    VESSELS SUPPORTING OCEAN EXPLORATION AND RESEARCH Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson The R/V Thomas G. Thompson is owned by the U.S. Navy Office of Naval Research and is operated by the Ship Specifications School of Oceanography at the University of Washington. The Thompson measures 274 feet in Length: 273 ft (Global Class) length and draws 19 feet with a full load. Normal Draft: 17 ft cruising speed for the ship is 11 knots. Speed: 11 knots Range: 11,300 nm Endurance: 60 days Core Capabilities Berthing: 22 crew, 38 mission personnel The Thompson is equipped for multidisciplinary Commissioned: 1991 research projects involving large science parties. The Sonar Systems: 30 kHz Kongsberg EM 302 vessel can berth up to 36 scientific personnel, 21 multibeam sonar, 3.5 kHz Knudsen 3260 sub‐ officers and crew, and two marine technicians. bottom profiler, ADCP Laboratory space includes a large dry lab, wet lab, two Other Capabilities: Designed for interoperability bioanalytical labs, and a “hydro” lab. The hydro lab of projects, including full ocean depth CTDs, AUVs, is where scientists typically direct any ROV and AUV and deep ocean ROVs operations. The Thompson has three winches, three cranes, and an A‐Frame for launching scientific equipment. It is also equipped with an EM 302 multibeam sonar system, sub‐bottom profiler, ADCP system, and CTD/rosette. A number of ROV and AUV systems have been deployed from Thompson. OER Use Thompson is one of the primary vessels that OER has used to support major expeditions in remote regions of the Pacific Ocean. The vast majority of these expeditions were identified through the competitive peer review proposal process.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Frost Damage in Concrete - Experimental Studies of Destruction Mechanisms
    Internal frost damage in concrete - experimental studies of destruction mechanisms Fridh, Katja 2005 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Fridh, K. (2005). Internal frost damage in concrete - experimental studies of destruction mechanisms. Division of Building Materials, LTH, Lund University. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 LUND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LUND UNIVERSITY Division of Building Materials INTERNAL FROST DAMAGE IN CONCRETE Experimental studies of destruction mechanisms Katja Fridh Report TVBM-1023 Doctoral thesis Lund 2005 ISRN LUTVDG/TVBM--05/1023--SE(1-276) ISSN 0348-7911 TVBM ISBN 91-628-6558-7 Lund Institute of Technology Telephone: 46-46-2227415 Division of Building Materials Telefax: 46-46-2224427 Box 118 www.byggnadsmaterial.lth.se SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden Preface The work presented here was carried out at the Division of Building Materials at the Lund Institute of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004
    Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004 Institute of the North • U.S. Arctic Research Commission • International Arctic Science Committee Arctic Ocean Marine Routes This map is a general portrayal of the major Arctic marine routes shown from the perspective of Bering Strait looking northward. The official Northern Sea Route encompasses all routes across the Russian Arctic coastal seas from Kara Gate (at the southern tip of Novaya Zemlya) to Bering Strait. The Northwest Passage is the name given to the marine routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans along the northern coast of North America that span the straits and sounds of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Three historic polar voyages in the Central Arctic Ocean are indicated: the first surface shop voyage to the North Pole by the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Arktika in August 1977; the tourist voyage of the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Sovetsky Soyuz across the Arctic Ocean in August 1991; and, the historic scientific (Arctic) transect by the polar icebreakers Polar Sea (U.S.) and Louis S. St-Laurent (Canada) during July and August 1994. Shown is the ice edge for 16 September 2004 (near the minimum extent of Arctic sea ice for 2004) as determined by satellite passive microwave sensors. Noted are ice-free coastal seas along the entire Russian Arctic and a large, ice-free area that extends 300 nautical miles north of the Alaskan coast. The ice edge is also shown to have retreated to a position north of Svalbard. The front cover shows the summer minimum extent of Arctic sea ice on 16 September 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 MTS Overview of Manned Underwater Vehicle Activity
    P A P E R 2007 MTS Overview of Manned Underwater Vehicle Activity AUTHOR ABSTRACT William Kohnen There are approximately 100 active manned submersibles in operation around the world; Chair, MTS Manned Underwater in this overview we refer to all non-military manned underwater vehicles that are used for Vehicles Committee scientific, research, tourism, and commercial diving applications, as well as personal leisure SEAmagine Hydrospace Corporation craft. The Marine Technology Society committee on Manned Underwater Vehicles (MUV) maintains the only comprehensive database of active submersibles operating around the world and endeavors to continually bring together the international community of manned Introduction submersible operators, manufacturers and industry professionals. The database is maintained he year 2007 did not herald a great through contact with manufacturers, operators and owners through the Manned Submersible number of new manned submersible de- program held yearly at the Underwater Intervention conference. Tployments, although the industry has expe- The most comprehensive and detailed overview of this industry is given during the UI rienced significant momentum. Submersi- conference, and this article cannot cover all developments within the allocated space; there- bles continue to find new applications in fore our focus is on a compendium of activity provided from the most dynamic submersible tourism, science and research, commercial builders, operators and research organizations that contribute to the industry and who share and recreational work; the biggest progress their latest information through the MTS committee. This article presents a short overview coming from the least likely source, namely of submersible activity in 2007, including new submersible construction, operation and the leisure markets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Naval Architect
    THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 HMAS Adelaide preparing to embark United States Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicles during Exercise Rim of the Pacific 18 (RIMPAC 2018), Hawaii, in July. HMAS Adelaide unexpectedly took a lead role in the amphibious phase of RIMPAC when the US Navy assault ship planned for that role suffered mechanical problems and remained in Pearl Harbour for most of the exercise. HMAS Adelaide led HMA Ships Success, Melbourne and Toowoomba across the Pacific to take part in this major exercise which involved 25 nations, 46 surface ships, five submarines, 17 land forces, and more than 200 aircraft and 25 000 personnel. This major international exercise is held every two years (RAN photograph) THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Journal of The Royal Institution of Naval Architects (Australian Division) Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 Cover Photo: CONTENTS An impression of BAE Systems’ Global Com- 2 From the Division President bat Ship — Australia, selected as the preferred 3 Editorial design for Australia’s new frigates 4 Letter to the Editor (Image courtesy Department of Defence) 4 Coming Events The Australian Naval Architect is published four times per 5 News from the Sections year. All correspondence and advertising copy should be 15 Classification Society News sent to: The Editor 17 From the Crows Nest The Australian Naval Architect 18 General News c/o RINA PO Box No. 462 36 The Acquisition of a Multi-role Aviation Jamison Centre, ACT 2614 Training Vessel for the Royal Australian AUSTRALIA Navy — Alex Robbins email: [email protected] 39 Upgrade or Replace: A Cost Comparison The deadline for the next edition of The Australian Na- val Architect (Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Distancing Italy Coronavirus Report What Is a Virus? Aurora Australis
    Episode 8 24th March 2020 Social Distancing 1. In your own words, explain what social distancing is. 2. How is it different to self-isolating? 3. Give some examples of social distancing. 4. What is the government doing to reduce the amount of contact people have with each other? 5. Why is social distancing important? 6. The idea with social distancing is it flattens the curve. What does that mean? 7. Schools that are still open are taking precautions to keep students safe. Give an example. 8. How can you stay connected to family and friends while social distancing? 9. Create a diagram or graphic that communicates the importance of social distancing. 10. How are you feeling about coronavirus? Share your thoughts with a friend or family member. Italy Coronavirus Report 1. Where in Italy do Maggie and Zach live? Locate using Google Maps. 2. Why did they move to Italy? 3. Northern Italy has had the most cases of coronavirus than anywhere else in Italy. True or False? 4. The whole of Italy is in lockdown. What does that mean? 5. Finish the following sentence: The government hopes that lockdown will… 6. What sorts of things did Maggie and Zach do before the lockdown? 7. What is life like for them since the lockdown? 8. What sorts of activities do Maggie and Zach do to pass the time? 9. How do they stay connected to their friends? 10. How do Maggie and Zach feel about the lockdown? What is a virus? 1. What did the BTN story explain? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experimental Study of Ice-Bed Separation During Glacial Sliding Benjamin Brett Etp Ersen Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2012 An experimental study of ice-bed separation during glacial sliding Benjamin Brett etP ersen Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Recommended Citation Petersen, Benjamin Brett, "An experimental study of ice-bed separation during glacial sliding" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12701. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12701 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An experimental study of ice-bed separation during glacial sliding by Benjamin Brett Petersen A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Geology Program of Study Committee: Neal R. Iverson, Major Professor Igor Beresnev Carl E. Jacobson Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2012 Copyright © Benjamin Brett Petersen, 2012. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Ice-bed separation 1 1.2 Sliding models 2 1.3 Hydrology models 5 1.4 Quarrying 8 1.5 Experimental studies of cavitation 9 1.6 Motivation and objectives 10 CHAPTER 2. METHODS 12 2.1 The ring-shear device 12 2.2 Procedure 19 2.3 Data processing 25 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Confluence Zone Between Laurentide and Cordilleran Ice Sheets Along the Rocky Mountain Foothills, Southwest Alberta
    This is a repository copy of Reconstructing the confluence zone between Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets along the Rocky Mountain Foothills, southwest Alberta. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/105138/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Utting, D., Atkinson, N., Pawley, S. et al. (1 more author) (2016) Reconstructing the confluence zone between Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets along the Rocky Mountain Foothills, southwest Alberta. Journal of Quaternary Science, 31 (7). pp. 769-787. ISSN 0267-8179 https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2903 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reconstructing the confluence zone between Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets along the Rocky Mountain Foothills, south-west Alberta Daniel J. Utting1, Nigel Atkinson1, Steven Pawley1, Stephen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Cretaceous), Northern James Ross Island, Antarctic Peninsula
    Cretaceous Research 56 (2015) 550e562 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Calcareous nannofossils from the Santa Marta Formation (Upper Cretaceous), northern James Ross Island, Antarctic Peninsula * Rodrigo do Monte Guerra a, , Andrea Concheyro b, c, Jackie Lees d, Gerson Fauth a, Marcelo de Araujo Carvalho e, Renato Rodriguez Cabral Ramos e a ITT Fossil, Instituto Tecnologico de Micropaleontologia, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), Av. UNISINOS, 950, B. Cristo Rei/CEP: 93.022- 000, Sao~ Leopoldo, RS, Brazil b Instituto Antartico Argentino (IAA), Buenos Aires, Argentina c IDEAN-CONICET, Departamento de Ci^encias Geologicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellon II, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428, Buenos Aires, Argentina d Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK e Museu Nacional e Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil article info abstract Article history: This study reports on the most stratigraphically extensive nannofloras yet recovered from the Lachman Received 26 March 2015 Crags Member of the Santa Marta Formation, James Ross Island, Antarctic Peninsula. The productive Received in revised form samples are dated as early Campanian. These ages are in accord with those provided by ammonites, 15 June 2015 foraminifera, ostracods and radiolarians from the same locality. The consistent and relatively abundant Accepted in revised form 16 June 2015 presence of Gephyrobiscutum diabolum throughout the productive part of the section, a species that has Available online 11 July 2015 previously only been documented from the Falkland Plateau, extends its geographic distribution to higher latitudes, at least to the Antarctic Peninsula area.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Crystal Growth Through Nonbasal Plane Adsorption of Antifreeze Proteins
    Blocking rapid ice crystal growth through nonbasal plane adsorption of antifreeze proteins Luuk L. C. Olijvea,b, Konrad Meisterc, Arthur L. DeVriesd, John G. Dumane, Shuaiqi Guof,g, Huib J. Bakkerc, and Ilja K. Voetsa,b,h,1 aInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; bLaboratory of Macromolecular and Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; cInstitute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands; dDepartment of Animal Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801; eDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; fProtein Function Discovery Group, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada K7l 3N6; gDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada K7l 3N6; and hLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands Edited by Pablo G. Debenedetti, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved January 26, 2016 (received for review December 14, 2015) Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are a unique class of proteins that bind AFPs also target different—sometimes multiple—ice crystal planes, to growing ice crystal surfaces and arrest further ice growth. AFPs including prism, pyramidal, and basal faces (Fig. 1) (13). Recent have gained a large interest for their use in antifreeze formula- Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations confirm this tions for water-based materials, such as foods, waterborne paints, specificity (14–16). and organ transplants. Instead of commonly used colligative AFPs exhibit two forms of activities.
    [Show full text]