DOCSLIB.ORG

TEES Summary and Update June 28, 2011 I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TEES Summary and Update June 28, 2011 I City of Portland, Oregon TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY ENHANCEMENT STRATEGY SUMMARY AND UPDATE June 28, 2011 Contents ______________________________________________________________________ Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii 1: BACKGROUND 1-1 Why Does Portland Need a Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy? 1-1 Main Elements 1-2 Teams 1-3 City TEES Team 1-3 Technical Advisory Group 1-3 2: UPDATED INFORMATION 2-4 Special Status Species—Wildlife 2-4 Special Status Species—Plants 2-7 Special Status Habitats 2-8 Landscape and Urban Habitat Features 2-8 Threats and Limiting Factors 2-9 Key Management Issues 2-9 Species of Management Concern 2-11 Plants 2-11 Animals 2-12 TEES Mapping 2-16 3: WATERSHED-SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES 3-19 Introduction 3-19 Willamette Watershed 3-21 Columbia Slough Watershed 3-27 Columbia River Watershed 3-31 Tryon Creek Watershed 3-33 Fanno Creek Watershed 3-34 Johnson Creek Watershed 3-36 4: STRATEGIES AND PRIORITY ACTIONS 4-40 Introduction 4-40 Willamette Watershed 4-40 Columbia Slough Watershed 4-41 Columbia River Watershed 4-43 Tryon/Fanno Creek Watersheds 4-43 Johnson Creek Watershed 4-44 ______________________________________________________________________________ TEES Summary and Update June 28, 2011 i 5: GUIDANCE FOR IMPROVING TERRESTRIAL HABITAT 5-45 TEES Site Assessment Forms 5-45 Guidance Documents 5-46 Specific Requests 5-46 Desired Future Conditions 5-47 6: MONITORING 6-48 Habitats and Biological Communities 6-48 Watershed Health Monitoring 6-49 Project-Level and Species-Level Monitoring 6-49 7: PROJECTS 7-53 Citywide 7-53 Willamette Watershed 7-54 Columbia Slough Watershed 7-57 Tryon/Fanno Creek Watersheds 7-58 Johnson Creek Watershed 7-59 8: OUTREACH AND EDUCATION 8-61 9. FUTURE WORK 9-64 10. ATTACHMENTS 10-67 A: Vertebrate Wildlife Species for Portland, Oregon B: Special Status Species—Wildlife C: Example of Special Status Wildlife Database Information D: Special Status Species—Plants E: Special Status Habitats F: Landscape and Urban Habitat Features G: Threats and Limiting Factors H: TEES Site Assessment Short Form I: TEES Site Assessment Long Form J: Using the TEES Site Assessment Forms K: TEES Site Report Template L: Guidance: “Avoiding Impacts on Nesting Birds During Construction and Revegetation Projects” M: Guidance: “Living with American Beavers” N: Portland Bird Agenda O: Wildlife of Portland Poster P: “Dogs for the Environment brochure and pledge form Q: “Portland’s Sensitive Wildlife and Your Dog” brochure and poster R: Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge Bird Checklist S: Mt. Tabor Bird Checklist ______________________________________________________________________________ TEES Summary and Update June 28, 2011 ii Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________________ Portland City Council adopted the Portland Watershed Management Plan and its supporting scientific foundation document, the Framework for Integrated Management of Watershed Health in March 2006. These established a definition of healthy urban watersheds; scientific principles and guidelines; a science-based watershed management approach; citywide watershed health goals and objectives for hydrology, physical habitat, water quality and biological communities; and strategies and actions for the next 2-5 years. The goals and objectives included both aquatic and terrestrial environments, but were aquatic-focused. Development of a Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) was subsequently embarked upon in 2006. A multi-bureau city team coordinated the TEES work, with assistance from a technical advisory group--the Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy Advisory Group (TEESAG). The purpose of the TEES is to have a common body of information and agreed-upon priorities for conservation and restoration of terrestrial plant and animal species and habitats in Portland within a regional and state context. The TEES is designed to help achieve the watershed health goals and objectives in the Portland Watershed Management Plan. The main elements of the TEES include: • Identification of plant and animal species and terrestrial habitats needing protection, conservation, and/or restoration • Identification of key management issues • Articulation of watershed-specific objectives for terrestrial habitats and biological communities • Identification and implementation of priorities and actions for the next 2-5 years • Guidance to city bureaus and citizens for improving habitat and addressing plant and wildlife management issues • Selection of species and habitats to be monitored over time to determine the health of biological communities in Portland's urban watersheds This Summary and Update summarizes the TEES and provides updated information as of June 2011 for each of these elements. It also identifies future work that will help the City achieve its watershed goals and objectives. ______________________________________________________________________________ TEES Summary and Update June 28, 2011 iii SECTION 1 Background ____________________________________________________________ WHY DOES PORTLAND NEED A TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY ENHANCEMENT STRATEGY? Portland’s City Council adopted the Portland Watershed Management Plan (PWMP) http://www.portlandonline.com/bes/index.cfm?c=38965 and its supporting scientific foundation document, the Framework for Integrated Management of Watershed Health (Framework) http://www.portlandonline.com/bes/fish/index.cfm?c=33528 in March 2006 (Resolution 36384). Together, these established a definition of healthy urban watersheds in Portland; scientific principles and guidelines; a science-based watershed management approach; citywide watershed health goals and objectives for hydrology, physical habitat, water quality, and biological communities; and strategies and actions for the next 2 to 5 years. Watershed Health Goals Hydrology—Move toward normative stream flows conditions to protect and improve watershed and stream health, channel functions, and public health and safety. Physical Habitat—Protect, enhance and restore aquatic and terrestrial habitat conditions and support key ecological functions and improved productivity, diversity, capacity, and distribution of native fish and wildlife populations and biological communities Water Quality—Protect and improve surface water and groundwater quality to protect public health and support native fish and wildlife populations and biological communities. Biological Communities—Protect, enhance, manage and restore native aquatic and terrestrial species and biological communities to improve and maintain biodiversity in Portland’s watersheds. Although the City’s watershed health goals include both the aquatic and the terrestrial environments, the objectives and actions in the PWMP are largely focused on the aquatic environment. The PWMP identified as a high priority the development and integration of a terrestrial component into watershed management. A Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) was subsequently embarked upon in 2006. Work accomplished or underway was previously summarized in TEES Summary and Update documents dated August 2007 and ______________________________________________________________________________ TEES Summary and Update 1 June 2010. This June 2011 TEES Summary and Update presents the most recent information for the TEES and supersedes the August 2007 and June 2010 versions. The purpose of the TEES is to have a common body of information and agreed-upon priorities for conservation and restoration of terrestrial plant and animal species and habitats in Portland, within a regional and state context. The TEES is designed to help achieve the watershed health goals and objectives in the PWMP. The information assembled during the development of the TEES (see “Main Elements” below) is available to BES watershed teams to supplement existing watershed characterizations; inform the selection and prioritization of actions; add value to projects and other actions; determine monitoring priorities; and support and inform the Grey to Green (G2G) project.1 The TEES work also supports and informs an array of other City programs, plans, activities, projects, and decision-making processes, including the Portland Plan update, environmental regulatory improvement, parks and natural area management, and local bond share land acquisition. In addition, the TEES supports efforts of Metro (e.g., Nature in Neighborhoods, Intertwine and the Regional Conservation Strategy), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (e.g., the Oregon Conservation Strategy), the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, and the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s sub-basin planning. MAIN ELEMENTS The main elements of the TEES include: • Identification of plant and animal species and terrestrial habitats needing protection, conservation, and/or restoration (Special Status Species and Habitats) • Identification of key management issues (e.g., invasive species) • Articulation of watershed-specific objectives for terrestrial habitats and biological communities • Identification and implementation of priorities and actions for the next 2 to 5 years, as well as identification of long-term actions • Guidance to City bureaus and citizens for improving habitat and addressing plant and wildlife management issues • Selection of species and habitats to be monitored over time to determine the health of biological communities in Portland’s urban watersheds 1 Grey to Green is a 5-year effort that will complement ongoing BES implementation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
    2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
    [Show full text]
  • ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended
    ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended Accept Park System Development Charge Methodology Update Report for implementation, and amend the applicable sections of City Code (Ordinance; amend Code Chapter 17.13) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. Ordinance No. 172614, passed by the Council on August 19, 1998 authorized establishment of a Parks and Recreation System Development Charge(SDC) and created a new City Code Chapter 17.13. 2. In October 1998 the City established a Parks SDC program. City Code required that the program be updated every two years to ensure that program goals were being met. An update was implemented on July 1, 2005 pursuant to Ordinance No. 179008, as amended. The required update reviewed the Parks SDC Program to determine that sufficient money will be available to fund capacity-increasing facilities identified by the Parks SDC-CIP; to determine whether the adopted and indexed SDC rate has kept pace with inflation; to determine whether the Parks SDC-CIP should be modified; and to ensure that SDC receipts will not over-fund such facilities. 3. Ordinance No 175774, passed by the Council on July 12, 2001 adopted The Parks 2020 Vision. This report highlighted significant challenges confronting the City in regards to shoring up our ailing park facilities, eliminating inequity in underserved neighborhoods, and providing a stable source of funding to address not just our existing shortfalls, but to also meet the needs created by new development. The Park SDC is the most significant revenue opportunity available to Parks to address growth. It is imperative that this opportunity is maximized to recover reasonable costs from new development.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Tribune Closer to Home
    Ducks primed for strong fi nish EDITION — SEE SPORTS, B1 Oregon leaving lone loss well behind GREATER PORTLAND PortlandT U E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 1 4 • T W IC E C H O S E N T H E N A T IO N ’S B E S T N O N D A IL Y P ATribune P E R • P O R T L A N D T R IB U N E .C O M • P U B L IS H E D T U E S D A Y A N D T HURSDAY Sites for Court new jobs wrestles face more with cap hurdles on liability Study says luring Legal fi ght swirls big employers around $12 million depends on local verdict in OHSU case By PETER W ONG land-use action The Tribune By JIM REDDEN The Oregon Supreme Court The Tribune will hear arguments Thurs- day, Nov. 6, on whether $3 mil- On paper, the Portland area lion in damages is “substan- has enough vacant industrial tial” enough for the family of land to meet employers’ a boy whose liver operation at needs for the next 20 years. Oregon Health & Science Uni- In reality, maybe not. More versity went awry in 2009. than half the available sites need A jury in Multnomah County government help to develop, in- Circuit Court returned a $12 mil- cluding assembling adjacent BIG DREAMS, lion verdict last year against lots, annexations into cities, in- OHSU and surgeon Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Within Your Reach a Publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council
    Winter 2011 Volume XIX, No. 1 Within Your Reach A publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council reach: a) a portion of a stream or river b) an extent, esp. of knowledge or comprehension Invasives, Trash and Donuts By JoAnn Herrigel, Community Services Director, City of Milwaukie I have attended the Johnson Creek Water- shed Council’s Watershed Wide Event (WWE) for almost ten years in a row. When I began attending this event, my daughter was 3 years old and she and I spent most of our time eat- ing donuts and wandering about talking to people. Thankfully, the donuts were plentiful (and yummy) and there were lots of fun people to chat with! People of all ages, vocations and Spawning Salmon Return interests attend these events and I always meet someone with an interesting story to tell. One to Upper Johnson Creek year I brought my two friends who were visit- By Matt Clark, Executive Director, JCWC ing from New York state and not only did they have a great time, but they entertained their In late 2010, three adult Coho Salmon carcasses and one live adult Coho were seen in work teammates with stories of their east coast mainstem Johnson Creek near the eastern border of Gresham, about 15 miles from the mouth lives and won the prize for having travelled the of Johnson Creek—much farther upstream than spawning Coho have been documented in farthest for a JCWC Watershed Wide Event! recent years. Historically, Coho were abundant throughout the Johnson Creek Watershed, but A few years in a row, I cajoled the members for the last twenty years or more, spawning Coho have only been documented in small numbers of the Milwaukie Riverfront Board, which I in lower Johnson Creek and Crystal Springs Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area
    Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area • Portland Parks and Recreation Percent of City Budget Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area 2.8% Remaining City Budget 97.2% Percent of Service Area Budget Portland Parks and Recreation 100.0% Service Area Overview Revised Adopted Change from Percent Requirements FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 Prior Year Change Operating 93,163,727 78,833,171 (14,330,556) (15.38) Capital 21,408,689 21,595,385 186,696 0.87 Total Requirements 114,572,416 100,428,556 (14,143,860) (12.34) Authorized Positions 445.13 411.13 (34.00) (7.64) City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2012-13 Adopted Budget 217 Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Service Area Highlights Description The Parks, Recreation, and Culture service area includes services for Portland Parks & Recreation, the Golf program, Portland International Raceway (PIR), and the Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund. Major Themes Portland Parks & The FY 2012-13 Adopted Budget for Parks includes a $2.9 million reduction in Recreation Operating ongoing General Fund discretionary resources, of which $981,829 is attributable to Budget support, management, and administrative functions affecting 10.0 FTE. In addition, the bureau has been allocated $370,000 of one-time General Fund resources to continue three Teen Programming positions and the summer lunch program. Parks Construction Parks' FY 2012-13 CIP budget is $21.6 million. Of this amount, $1.2 million is and Maintenance supported by the City's General Fund with remaining funding derived from grants, Program system development charges, the Portland Development Commission, Metro, and other sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Within Your Reach a Publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council
    Winter 2009 Volume XVII, No. 1 Within Your Reach A publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council reach: a) a portion of a stream or river b) an extent, esp. of knowledge or comprehension Cultural Perspectives of the Watershed: The first in a multi-part series exploring diverse cultural perspectives of Johnson Creek Watershed Native Oregonian Perspective By Charles F. Sams III, Director Tribal and Native Lands Program, Trust for Public Land In 1491, the largest inhabited city in Eu- rope was London, England with a popula- tion of nearly 90,000 people. In that same Oregon Hunters Association members gather at their stewardship site at Powell Butte. year, the area around present day Portland was populated by between 30,000 to 50,000 Natives, mostly Chinook, Clackamas, North- Watershed Wide Event Depends ern Molalla, Tualatin, Siletz, and Kalapuya tribal peoples. For over 10,000 years, Native on Committed Partners Like OHA Americans lived throughout the By Rick Williams, Vice President, Oregon Hunters Association Willamette Valley. When you see volunteers clad in hunter the first national parks, started the wildlife It is, therefore, no orange clothing clearing invasive vegetation preserve system, and developed our first con- coincidence that or replanting native species during the John- servation programs. These efforts, followed the City of Port- son Creek Watershed Wide Event, you might by the actions of other great conservation- land, which lies at wonder, “Who are these people and why are ists like Aldo Leopold, led to our current the intersection of they here?” The answer is that all of those system of national wildlife management and the Willamette and volunteers are hunters and they belong to an the recovery of our wildlife resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2016 Volume XXIV, No
    Winter 2016 Volume XXIV, No. 1 Mark Your Calendars - Watershed Wide 2016 - Danielle Miles, Volunteer and Outreach Coordinator As the days begin to get longer again, the Oregon grapes and Indian plums begin to break their buds—reminding us that spring is coming, and with it, our annual Watershed Wide event. If you haven’t participated in this surge of volunteerism that spans the length of the Johnson Creek Watershed, you’ll want to mark your calendars. On March 5th, 400 volunteers are needed to tackle ten sites across the entire watershed—all in one day. We will remove invasive plant species, plant thousands of bare- root plants and live stake cuttings, and mulch young seedlings. After a morning of good hard work, we will feast together on hot pizza—compliments of the watershed council and our partners. There is nothing like biting into a slice of piping hot pizza after working outside, surrounded by the cheerful hum of friends and neighbors. Watershed Wide is truly an event too big for one organization alone to tackle. Our partners at Portland Parks and Recreation, the City of Gresham, Crystal Springs Partnership, Friends of Trees, and Friends of Tideman Johnson all help us pull off this day of community service; sponsors like Clackamas Water Environment Services help us cover some of the costs; and hundreds of volunteers help us get plants in the ground. Registration opens on February 1st, 2016. To sign up, visit the “Events Calendar” on our website (www.jcwc.org) and click on the Watershed Wide Event on March 5th.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File Adopted Budget Volume 1
    Adopted Budget City of Portland, Oregon Fiscal Year 2011-12 Volume One Citywide Summaries and Bureau Budgets Mayor Sam Adams Commissioner Nick Fish Commissioner Amanda Fritz Commissioner Randy Leonard Commissioner Dan Saltzman Auditor LaVonne Griffin-Valade This document is printed on 100% post- consumer waste recycled paper. Table of Contents Budget Award . .1 User's Guide . .3 Mayor's Message . .7 Overviews. 13 City Overview. 13 Budget Overview . 26 Financial Overview. 38 Budget Notes . 68 Financial Summaries . 73 Public Safety Service Area . 111 Bureau of Emergency Communications. 115 Bureau of Fire & Police Disability & Retirement . 127 Portland Police Bureau . 144 Portland Fire and Rescue . 171 Portland Office of Emergency Management . 199 Parks Recreation and Culture Service Area . 211 Portland Parks and Recreation. 213 Public Utilities Service Area . 247 Bureau of Environmental Services . 251 Portland Water Bureau . 294 Community Development Service Area . 331 Bureau of Development Services . 335 Portland Housing Bureau. 364 Bureau of Planning and Sustainability . 386 Cable Communications and Franchise Management . 412 Office of Neighborhood Involvement. 425 Office of Sustainable Development . 449 Portland Development Commission . 451 Transportation and Parking Service Area. 463 Portland Bureau of Transportation. 465 Elected Officials Service Area . 495 Office of the City Auditor . 497 Office of the Mayor . 519 Commissioner of Public Affairs . 526 Commissioner of Public Safety . 534 Commissioner of Public Utilities . 539 Commissioner of Public Works . 545 City Support Services Service Area . 551 Office of the City Attorney. 553 Office of Government Relations . 564 Office of Human Relations. 574 Office of Management and Finance. 584 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2010–11 Adopted Budget i Table of Contents OMF Directors Office .
    [Show full text]
  • Citywide Summaries & Bureau Budgets
    Adopted Budget City of Portland, Oregon Fiscal Year 2016-17 Volume One Citywide Summaries and Bureau Budgets Mayor Charlie Hales Commissioner Nick Fish Commissioner Amanda Fritz Commissioner Steve Novick Commissioner Dan Saltzman Auditor Mary Hull Caballero This document is printed on 100% post- consumer waste recycled paper. Table of Contents Budget Award . 1 User’s Guide. 3 Mayor’s Message. 7 City Overview. 11 Budget Overview . 25 Financial Overview . 39 Budget Notes . 69 Guide to Financial Summaries . 73 Financial Summaries. 77 Public Safety Service Area . 113 Bureau of Emergency Communications . 117 Bureau of Fire & Police Disability & Retirement . 127 Portland Police Bureau . 143 Portland Fire & Rescue . 173 Portland Bureau of Emergency Management . 192 Parks, Recreation, & Culture Service Area . 205 Portland Parks & Recreation . 207 Public Utilities Service Area . 241 Bureau of Environmental Services . 243 Portland Water Bureau . 283 Community Development Service Area. 317 Bureau of Development Services . 321 Portland Housing Bureau. 354 Bureau of Planning & Sustainability. 378 Office of Neighborhood Involvement . 402 Portland Development Commission . 424 Office of Equity & Human Rights . 439 Transportation & Parking Service Area. 457 Portland Bureau of Transportation. 459 Elected Officials Service Area . 491 Office of the City Auditor . 493 Office of the Mayor . 516 Commissioner of Public Affairs . 522 Commissioner of Public Safety . 530 Commissioner of Public Utilities . 535 Commissioner of Public Works . 542 City Support Services Service Area. 547 Office of the City Attorney . 550 Office of Government Relations. 562 Office of Management & Finance . 573 Human Resources . 607 Bureau of Internal Business Services . 616 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2016-17 Adopted Budget i Table of Contents Bureau of Revenue & Financial Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File Parks SDC Annual Report
    Park System Development Charge Annual Report 07/01/19 - 06/30/20 2019-20 Program to Date Park SDC Fees-Rev System 21,512,991.67 254,116,846.31 Leveraged Funds - Grants, Donations, Partner Funds, Loans 831,675.64 16,367,231.80 Interest on Investments and Loans 2,800,876.88 10,708,321.15 Bond Proceeds - OHRF Loan 0.00 959,100.00 Loan Proceeds - Waterleaf / Clatsop Butte Promissary Note 0.00 1,600,000.00 Loans Receivable - PCU Loan 0.00 350,000.00 Loans Receivable - OHRF Loan 0.00 991,598.57 Loans Receivable - Colwood Loan 170,250.00 340,500.00 Loans Receivable - Washington Park Parking Meters Loan 428,220.00 973,020.00 Loans Receivable - PIR Loan 0.00 250,000.00 Bond Proceeds from SDC Loan Payment Contract Sales 0.00 3,315,406.00 Bond Sales Line of Credit 0.00 6,000,000.00 Gross Revenue* 25,744,014.19 295,972,023.83 Administration & Compliance Costs 359,615.07 7,496,188.69 Net Revenue 25,384,399.12 288,475,835.14 Percent Administration & Compliance 1.42% 2.60% Fund Level Expenditures Investment - Waterleaf/ Clatsop Butte Promissary Note Repayment 0.00 1,612,266.36 Investment - PCU Loan 0.00 350,000.00 Investment - OHRF Loan 0.00 978,598.00 Investment - Washington Park Meters Loan 0.00 886,619.66 Investment - Colwood Golf Loan 0.00 1,135,000.00 Investment - PIR Loan 0.00 1,750,000.00 Debt Payments on OHRF loan 0.00 1,045,282.82 Debt Payments on Line of Credit 0.00 6,932,674.90 Total available for projects 273,785,393.40 Summary Expenditures by geographic-area ** 2019-20 Program to Date Central City 49,990.67 24,840,419.99 North 344,428.95 8,065,492.59 Northeast 682,939.40 22,636,440.02 Northwest 435,272.71 2,276,653.06 East 6,652,670.59 54,041,809.73 Southeast 2,618,469.14 6,666,279.91 Southwest 279,550.56 13,339,001.12 South**** 49,826.28 49,826.28 Citywide 494,621.65 615,571.07 Total Capital Expenditures 11,607,769.95 132,531,493.77 Fund Balance*** 141,253,899.63 * As of June 30, 2011, the combined Limited Tax Revenue bonds outstanding total is $0.
    [Show full text]
  • Outer East, but the Metro-Owned and Operated Glendoveer Golf Course Is Located in the Central Part of the Sub-Area
    PARKS 2020 VISION O UTER EAST Distinctive Features I There are no city-owned golf courses in Outer East, but the Metro-owned and operated Glendoveer Golf Course is located in the central part of the sub-area. Description: The Outer East sub-area (see map at end of this section) is characterized by lower-density develop- Population – Current and Future: Outer East ranks ment with pockets and corridors of higher-density and second in population with 111,800 and is projected new development. Portions of Outer East were part of to grow to 134,230 by 2020 - an increase of 20%. unincorporated Multnomah County until the late 1980s Population density will increase in particular in the Lents when they were annexed into Portland. Town Center and the Gateway Urban Renewal Areas. Resources and Facilities: The Outer East area has 879 acres of parkland, ranking fourth in total park acreage. Although Outer East has the largest number of neighborhood parks of any sub-area, only seven are improved. Many of the parks were originally part of DISTRIBUTION OF SUBAREA ACRES BY PARK TYPE the County's park system. Powell Butte Nature Park contains 70 percent of this area’s park acreage. I There are a number of natural resource sites in Outer East including the Columbia Slough, Upper Johnson Creek, and Powell and Clatsop Buttes. I Leach Botanical Garden is located in Outer East along Johnson Creek. There are no community gardens in this sub-area. I There is one community center – the new East Portland Community Center (EPCC), but no PP&R aquatic facilities in this sub-area.
    [Show full text]