DOCSLIB.ORG

Parks, Recreation, and Culture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TABLE OF CONTENTS Parks, Recreation, and Culture . 31 Parks and Recreation . 33 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2006–07 Adopted Budget 31 Parks and Recreation Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Overview and Financial Tables BUREAU SUMMARY Bureau Mission Portland Parks and Recreation (PP&R) contributes to Portland's vitality by: Establishing and safeguarding the parks, natural resources, and urban forest that are the soul of the city, ensuring that green spaces are accessible to all Developing and maintaining excellent facilities and places for public recreation Building community through play and relaxation, gathering, and solitude Providing and coordinating recreation services and programs that contribute to the health and well being of residents of all ages and abilities CIP Highlights PP&R has in excess of $835 million of built assets in addition to some 10,000 acres of open space. PP&R's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is built on four strategic goals based on City Council's priorities, Parks 2020 Vision Plan, and PP&R's Total Asset Management Plan: Restore failing infrastructure and extend the life of existing parks and buildings. Ensure a family-friendly city, and address the lack of equitable distribution of services across the city through park and facility development and land acquisition. Support population growth and density increases in neighborhoods by providing additional park and recreation facilities. Respond to new trends and citywide visions. The PP&R capital program for FY 2006-07 projects expenditures of more than $28 million. Of this, 76% of project funds will be spent on family-friendly related projects, and 24% will be spent on maintaining infrastructure. Significant projects are briefly described below. Family-Friendly Projects East Portland Community Center Aquatics - $10.9 million (multi-year commitment) This facility will serve families in the outer east portion of Portland. The Parks Levy is the primary funding source for this capital project. Public meetings are completed, design is underway, and construction is anticipated to begin in 2007 with facility completion in spring 2008. Of the $10.9 million, $3.8 million is a new allocation of one-time General Fund discretionary resources set aside pending construction, at which time they will be transferred to PP&R’s Capital Construction and Maintenance fund. City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2006–07 Adopted Budget 33 Parks and Recreation Overview and Financial Tables Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area University Park Community Center Phase III - $2.4 million (multi-year commitment) Funded by the Parks Levy and federal UPARR grant funds, this project includes the renovation of 12,000 square feet and construction of a new gymnasium at University Park Community Center in north Portland. Construction will begin in April 2006 with completion in 2007. Washington Monroe Site Acquisition - $5.4 (multi-year commitment). The Washington Monroe site has been purchased from Portland Public Schools for the future development of a community center and sports field that will serve the inner Southeast neighborhood and surrounding area. The City is required to repay the loan within three years. Payments will rely on the sale of surplus assets and/or tax increment financing, as available. Sellwood Gap Trail on Springwater - $2.0 million Funded by Federal Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Priorities (MTIP) grant and Metro bond funds, this one mile segment will complete a continuous trail of 19 miles. Design began in Spring 2006 with construction anticipated for 2007. River District Neighborhood Park - $2.7 million The third in a series of River District parks, this project includes design and construction of a neighborhood park to support the new population. It will be funded by PDC using tax increment financing. Public meetings and design work are anticipated to begin summer 2006. Infrastructure Projects Parks Maintenance Facilities - $3.6 million (multi-year commitment) A key infrastructure project is development of parks maintenance facilities that will replace Mt. Tabor Yard, a highly deteriorated, non-code compliant facility. A combination of General Fund and Parks Levy funds are applied to this project. Identification of appropriate property, design, and relocation of staff is anticipated for spring 2006 through spring 2007. Of the total funding, $650,000 is General Fund discretionary resources set aside in fund contingency pending completion of a facilities plan due by October 2006. Deferred Maintenance - $1.6 million City Council allocated both one-time and ongoing funds for FY 2005-06 to address deferred maintenance. This budget adds another $346,582 of ongoing funding. Ongoing funding for deferred maintenance totals $795,288 in FY 2006-07. Projects continued in FY 2006-07 include Fulton Community Center plumbing repair, Multnomah Arts Center ceiling repair, and park restroom repair at seven locations. 34 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2006–07 Adopted Budget Overview and Financial Tables Parks and Recreation Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Multiple Objectives Project Three Downtown Parks Projects - $3.5 million O'Bryant Square renovation addresses infrastructure concerns. Work will include design and construction for a new plaza at South Park Block Five, renovation of O'Bryant Square, and planning work for Ankeny Park on Burnside (no construction funding is available at this time). Funding for the Three Downtown Parks project comes from Parks Levy, PDC tax increment financing, and a significant private donation from Mr. Tom Moyer. Major Issues PP&R has and continues to face several key challenges in relation to capital investment. These include: Unmet Service Needs There are parts of Portland where families and residents do not have ready access to parks or recreation facilities. Along with deteriorating infrastructure, this has been a citizen concern that is voiced regularly and was thoroughly documented in the Parks 2020 Vision Plan. Providing new parks and recreation facilities is difficult because they require additional operating and maintenance dollars, which are scarce. At the same time, citizens and legal mandates remind us that City services are not distributed equitably. Funding As PP&R creatively seeks alternative funding sources to respond to priority needs, some types of projects are more readily funded than others. The system development charge (SDC) and tax increment financing in urban renewal areas are good sources for projects that respond to population growth, but these cannot be used in non-growth areas or outside urban renewal boundaries. Grant funding typically targets specific topic or geographic areas. Finding funding for park projects in stable, non-urban renewal areas is a major challenge. Aging Infrastructure The City’s park system dates back to 1860 and includes many heavily used facilities. The aging infrastructure limits service levels in parks, community centers, and cultural facilities. Years of reduced investment and deferred maintenance have further aged assets. Certainty of Operating and Maintenance Funds One of the greatest issues facing the PP&R system is the increasing cost of operations and maintenance (O&M). A dependable, annual revenue stream for O&M is essential to maintaining the park system. City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2006–07 Adopted Budget 35 Parks and Recreation Overview and Financial Tables Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Changes from Prior This proposal is generally in keeping with previous CIP submissions. Major changes Year include: Inclusion of several major trail projects following Council's success in securing MTIP federal grant funds. Projects include the Sellwood Gap, Waud Bluff, and Marine Drive trails in southeast, north and northeast Portland. Availability of additional SDC funds for acquisitions and development in growth areas. These funds are available due to increases in SDC charges approved by Council in December 2004 and effective July 1, 2005. However, in addition to the increase, the City fully exempted all affordable housing from the park SDC, including for-profit affordable development. The change to the program provides approximately 30% cost recovery to address park needs for our growing population. STRATEGIC DIRECTION Council Goals and Family Friendly Priorities The Mayor and Council have emphasized the need for Portland to be a family-friendly city and PP&R responds to this priority in two ways. There are areas in the city that lack park and recreation facilities. Here PP&R responds to families by providing services to those neighborhoods. Approximately 43% of project funds for 2006-2007 address this issue with an investment of $8 million. Key projects that will support families include the new aquatic facility at East Portland Community Center and the new gymnasium at University Park Community Center in north Portland. As population grows within the city, the priority on family livability becomes important. Approximately 33% of project funds in FY 2006-07 address population growth and livability, with an investment of $6.2 million. A key investment area is land acquisition for parks and natural areas. Maintaining Infrastructure The Council's strong focus on the City wide problem of deteriorating infrastructure has highlighted the importance of addressing the city’s maintenance needs. PP&R has responded with approximately 24% of project funds for FY 2006-07 addressing infrastructure repair, with an investment of $4.4 million.
Recommended publications
  • Ventura Park Bike Skills Area Access Trail to Columbia Slough Parklane

    Ventura Park Bike Skills Area Access Trail to Columbia Slough Parklane

    Expanded Service Areas Of NE ALDER WOO Colwood National D RD Proposed E205 Improvement Golf E Course V A Sites D N 2 205 Access Trail To 8 E N Johnson Lake Other Improvement Sites Thomas Cully Property Columbia Slough Property Existing Park Service Areas NE KILLINGSWORTH ST Portland Parks E NE V W A H I Sacajawea Park H T NE A T MAR 8 IN Columbia Pioneer NE K E DR S 3 ANDY E BLV 1 Cemetery D R E W E A V N Y N E A AI RPO H R 0 T W 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Powell Grove T AY 8 E NE PRES Cemetery 4 COT V T ST 1 A E Senns Dairy Miles N D E N V 2 Park 0 A 1 H E T N NE 5 RO 0 1 NE MASON ST CK Y E PARKROSE B N U T Argay Park T E SCHOOL DISTRICT E R Kimmel Property V Columbia Slough D A NE FRE Natural MONT ST Beech Property T Wilkes Park S NE FREMONT ST 1 Area 4 Rocky Butte 1 E E V Natural N A E Area V D A N R 2 D 9 REYNOLDS D N Wilkes Headwaters E 2 H 2 N T Property Glenhaven Park 1 1 E SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 1 N E Madison Community N 84 Garden Rose City Golf Course Knott Park John Luby Park E Thompson Park V East Holladay Park A NE TILLAMOOK S RA T SAN FAE D NE L NE SAN S T N RAFAEL ST 2 6 1 Playground E N NE HALSEY ST NE HALSEY ST E V A D N 2 East Holladay 8 E Park Glendoveer N Golf Montavilla Ventura Park Course Park Bike Skills Area Kwan Yin Temple E NE GLISAN ST V Cemetery A T S 1 8 1 E Glenfair Park N East Portland E BURNSIDE ST E V A T Ventura Park S Community Center Stark Street 1 8 1 Island SE STARK ST E E S V E E A V Playground V A H A T H 7 Midland Park H T 1 T Floyd Light 0 1 8 3 4 1 Berrydale Park E Park 1 S Parklane Park E E S North Powellhurst
  • District Background

    District Background

    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
  • URA FINANCIAL SUMMARY DATE: January 29, 2009 TO: Board Of

    URA FINANCIAL SUMMARY DATE: January 29, 2009 TO: Board Of

    URA FINANCIAL SUMMARY DATE: January 29, 2009 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Bruce A. Warner, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report Number 09-14 Waterfront Park and MAX Retail Construction Contract Amendments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED Adopt Resolution No. 6669 Adopt Resolution No. 6670 ACTION SUMMARY These actions will authorize an increase to the construction contracts for the Waterfront Park and the MAX Retail / Burnside Bridge improvement projects (Projects): • Brown Contracting Contract increase of $359,857, from $10,261,236 to $10,621,093 • Cedar Mill Construction Contract increase of $215,449, from $951,214 to $1,166,663 • Total increase for both Brown and Cedar Mill: $575,306 Several causes have led to the cost increases, including: • Increased costs for utility connections • Unforeseen subsurface conditions in Waterfront Park and MAX Retail • Design related issues, including drawing errors and omissions that resulted in increased design fees and additional Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) staff time • Recent unforeseen weather impacts The Projects are under a compressed schedule, to accommodate the Portland Saturday Market move to Waterfront Park in time for their 2009 season. PUBLIC BENEFIT The Projects are part of the Ankeny Burnside Development Framework adopted by the Board on December 13, 2006 (Resolution #6420), and implementation supports the permanent home for Portland Saturday Market, Mercy Corps World Headquarters (80,000 square feet, $37 million historic rehabilitation and new construction), the White Stag / University of Oregon Portland Center (133,000 square feet, $33 million historic rehabilitation) and the disposition of Block 8 between NW Naito Pkwy., 1st Ave., Couch and Davis (anticipated historic rehabilitation and new construction).
  • A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment Objective 1: Restore

    A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment Objective 1: Restore

    A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment In November 2002, Portland voters approved a five-year Parks Levy to begin in July 2003. Levy dollars restored budget cuts made in FY 2002-03 as well as major services and improvements outlined in the Parks 2020 Vision plan adopted by City Council in July 2001. In order to fulfill our obligation to the voters, we identified four key objectives. This report highlights what we have accomplished to date. Objective 1: Restore $2.2 million in cuts made in 2002/03 budget The 2003 Parks Levy restored cuts that were made to balance the FY 2002-03 General Fund budget. These cuts included the closure of some recreational facilities, the discontinuation and reduction of some community partnerships that provide recreational opportunities for youth, and reductions in maintenance of parks and facilities. Below is a detailed list of services restored through levy dollars. A. Restore programming at six community schools. SUN Community Schools support healthy social and cross-cultural development of all participants, teach and model values of respect and inclusion of all people, and help reduce social disparities and inequities. Currently, over 50% of students enrolled in the program are children of color. 2003/04 projects/services 2004/05 projects/services Proposed projects/services 2005/06 Hired and trained full-time Site Coordinators Total attendance at new sites (Summer Continue to develop programming to serve for 6 new PP&R SUN Community Schools: 2004-Spring 2005): 85,159 the needs of each school’s community and Arleta, Beaumont, Centennial, Clarendon, increase participation in these programs.

  • Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings

    View this email in your browser Share this URBAN FORESTRY January 2016 Get Involved! | Resources | Tree Permits | Tree Problems | Home In This Issue Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings, Urban Forestry in the Schoolyard Hiring Youth Conservation Crew (YCC) Summer Crew Leader, Apply by Thursday, March 3, 2016 Upcoming Urban Forestry Workshops, Free and Open to the Public Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry You may have recently heard about the upcoming 5% budget cuts proposed for Parks programs. Among the difficult reductions proposed, Urban Forestry could be effected by elimination of the $185,000 Dutch Elm Disease (DED) Treatment program. The City of Portland has minimized the spread of DED and avoided the decimation of the American elm (Ulmus americana) with a successful elm monitoring and treatment program. Without advanced warning, rapid detection and removal, the American elm could ultimately vanish from our landscape. Eastmoreland, Ladd’s Addition, the South Park blocks, Lents Park, Laurelhurst Park, and Overlook Park are areas where elms play a significant role in neighborhood identity. "Many communities have been able to maintain a healthy population of mature elms through a vigilant program of identification and removal of diseased elms and systematic pruning of weakened, dying or dead branches" -Linda Haugen, Plant Pathologist, USDA Forest Service Eliminating this program will also require adjacent property owners to cover the cost of removing DED- infected street trees themselves. The cut will also reduce citywide 24/7 emergency response to clear roads of trees which have fallen during storms, and reduce regular maintenance of publicly-owned trees- additional activities performed by some of the same staff .
  • 2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx

    2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx

    2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
  • BEE Document

    BEE Document

    SMILE General Meeting minutes August 7, 2019 SMILE Station Main Website Procedural www.SellwoodMoreland.org <<>> www.SMILErecords.org OFFICERS PRESENT: Tyler Janzen, President; Simon Fulford, Vice President; Pat Hainley, Treasurer; Eric Norberg, Secretary BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Elaine O’Keefe; Julie Currin; Bob Burkholder; Joel Leib; Rhea Smith; Gail Hoffnagle President Tyler Janzen called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m., and began by asking those present to introduce themselves, around the room. With a quorum present, Janzen asked that the minutes of the June 5 General Meeting be reviewed. (There was no General Meeting in July, due to the Independence Day holiday.) After a review of the minutes, Ed Nunez moved the minutes be accepted as presented, Elaine O’Keefe seconded the motion, and the motion carried unanimously. First to speak was R. Corless, Chair of the SMILE Crime Prevention Committee, who began by announcing that there had been a stranger-to-stranger stabbing early Monday morning near the Springwater Corridor Trail on S.E. Marion Street, and a homeless man was identified as the attacker in the incident and had been arrested. Ms. Corless then introduced Tatyana Bondarchuk, a Crime Victim Advocate, for a presentation on her nonprofit. Ms. Bondarchuk began by saying she was originally from Russia, but has been a resident of the United States since the turn of the century. Her office is at 7931 N.E. Halsey Street, and her telephone number is 971/888-7830 – all services offered by her office are free. Assault and robbery lead the list of crimes her office confronts; child abuse is also a major issue, as are abuse of alcohol and drugs.
  • About East Portland Neighborhoods Vol

    About East Portland Neighborhoods Vol

    EAST PORTLAND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION NEWS October 2009 News about East Portland Neighborhoods vol. 14 issue 4 Your NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS Argay pg.pg. pg. pg.5 pg.6 pg. Neighborhood Association 33 4 6 12 Centennial Community Association All about East Portland Glenfair Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Association News … Hazelwood The East Portland in outer East Portland that events, graffiti cleanups, and tribution with positive, far- Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Association make up the EPNO coalition tree plantings. reaching results. News (EPNAN) isn’t a news- (our alliance individual neigh- As you look through our The volunteers of the East Lents paper in the traditional sense. borhoods) – know more paper and see how your Portland Neighbors Inc. Neighborhood Association It wasn’t created to compete about this sanctioned system neighbors are making a real Newspaper Committee thank with community, city or of neighborhood organiza- difference in their neighbor- you for taking a few minutes Mill Park national news outlets – nei- tions, recognized by City gov- hood, perhaps you’ll be to discover more about what Neighborhood Association ther in content nor for adver- ernment. encouraged by their efforts. your neighbors are doing, tisers. So, the stories and photos Then, possibly you’ll decide and how you can help outer Parkrose Heights EPNAN is the way the East you see on the pages inside to take as little as one hour a East Portland be an even Association of Neighbors Portland Neighborhood are about volunteers and month to participate in your nicer place to live when we Organization (EPNO) reach- organizations that are work- neighborhood association work together.
  • LEGEND: FARMER’S MARKET Car Free Segment

    LEGEND: FARMER’S MARKET Car Free Segment

    U.S. Post Office HOYT FLIP OVER FOR STREET SOCCER @ PNCA EVENT TIMES AND LOCATIONS GLISAN PORTLAND BOCCE LEAGUE FLANDERS CORGI WALK IN THE PEARL EVERETT P:EAR 8TH PARK STREET ROOTS DAVIS SISTERS OF THE ROAD COUCH ANKENY SQUARE FOOD CARTS IRVING BURNSIDE ANKENY SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE! OAK #GREENLOOPPDX OREGON WALKS STARK NELSON/NYGAARD #OREGONWALKWAYS O’Bryant #CONNECTTHEPARKBLOCKS Sq. BROADWAY POP-UP GREEN LOOP WASHINGTON EXHIBIT PARK CITY REPAIR ALDER e n i L I-405 r a MORRISON C t e e r t Director S Park Pioneer YAMHILLCourthouse Sq. s e n i L TAYLOR x a M Re n d e / B e lu r e Ma G x SALMON / Lin w es o l l 9TH PORTLAND ART MUSEUM e Y MAIN CENTRAL LIBRARY READING NOOK THE GIVING TREE MADISON Tom McCall Waterfront Park JEFFERSON OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY HISTORY HUB COLUMBIA CITY OF PORTLAND INFO BOOTHS CLAY PSU PORTLAND MARKET LEGEND: FARMER’S MARKET Car Free Segment MILL Shared Segment Loop PDX Pop-Up Exhibit MONTGOMERY Public Restrooms HARRISON OPEN STREETS SUMMIT PUBLIC KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Historical Markers HALL Water Fountains COLLEGE PSU REC CLUB Volunteer Check-In JACKSON First Aid CHECK OUT ALL THE ACTIVITIES AND SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE! #GREENLOOPPDX #OREGONWALKWAYS #CONNECTTHEPARKBLOCKS STREET SOCCER @ PNCA PICK UP GAMES AT THE PNCA PARKING LOT NW PARK AND NW GLISAN 12PM - 3PM PORTLAND BOCCE LEAGUE COME PARTICIPATE IN BOCCE DEMOS AND TRAININGS AND BE NW PARK AND NW GLISAN A PART OF A BOCCE TOURNAMENT 10AM - 4PM CORGI WALK IN THE PEARL COME WATCH THE ANNUAL WALK THAT RAISES MONEY FOR WALK BEGINS AT NW PARK AND NW EVERETT OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY AND CORGI RESCUE.
  • Burnside and Couch Transportation and Urban Design Plan Phase Ii Catalyst Development Study

    Burnside and Couch Transportation and Urban Design Plan Phase Ii Catalyst Development Study

    BURNSIDE AND COUCH TRANSPORTATION AND URBAN DESIGN PLAN PHASE II CATALYST DEVELOPMENT STUDY Final Draft June 2005 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY OF PORTLAND PORTLAND OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION Tom Potter Brant Williams Mayor Bureau Director WIlliam S. Hoffman Project Manager PORTLAND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Doug McCollum Traffic Systems Design Engineer Don Mazziotti Executive Director CONSULTANT TEAM Cheryl Twete Lloyd Lindley Interim Director of Development Lloyd D. Lindley, ASLA Lew Bowers Gene Callen Senior Development Manager GBD Architects Jerry Johnson PROJECT TEAM Johnson Gardner LLC Don Singer Denyse McGriff Integra Realty Resources Kathryn Krygier Peter Finley Fry Finley Fry Lisa Abuaf Craig S. Holmes Artist Leah Halstead Greenwood Heather Hansen Christine Hermann TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 1 Study Area 2 Economic Impact 2 Catalyst Development Study Diagram 4 Transportation and Urban Design Plan 4 Conclusions 6 Next Steps 11 Catalyst DEVELOPMENT Study Introduction 13 Catalyst Development Study Diagram 16 Existing Conditions 19 Development Advantages 26 Development Challenges 27 Catalyst Development Sites 29 Lower East Burnside and Couch 29 Lower/Central West Burnside and Couch 39 Upper West Burnside 45 Investment and Return 47 Conclusions 50 Next Steps 52 appendix Public Outreach 53 “The central city is walkable now and will be so in the future. With growing urban intensity and more traffic, this means equitable access to our streets and public ways for all modes of transportation, while maintaining human scale and walkability.
  • ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended

    ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended

    ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended Accept Park System Development Charge Methodology Update Report for implementation, and amend the applicable sections of City Code (Ordinance; amend Code Chapter 17.13) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. Ordinance No. 172614, passed by the Council on August 19, 1998 authorized establishment of a Parks and Recreation System Development Charge(SDC) and created a new City Code Chapter 17.13. 2. In October 1998 the City established a Parks SDC program. City Code required that the program be updated every two years to ensure that program goals were being met. An update was implemented on July 1, 2005 pursuant to Ordinance No. 179008, as amended. The required update reviewed the Parks SDC Program to determine that sufficient money will be available to fund capacity-increasing facilities identified by the Parks SDC-CIP; to determine whether the adopted and indexed SDC rate has kept pace with inflation; to determine whether the Parks SDC-CIP should be modified; and to ensure that SDC receipts will not over-fund such facilities. 3. Ordinance No 175774, passed by the Council on July 12, 2001 adopted The Parks 2020 Vision. This report highlighted significant challenges confronting the City in regards to shoring up our ailing park facilities, eliminating inequity in underserved neighborhoods, and providing a stable source of funding to address not just our existing shortfalls, but to also meet the needs created by new development. The Park SDC is the most significant revenue opportunity available to Parks to address growth. It is imperative that this opportunity is maximized to recover reasonable costs from new development.
  • Sub-Area: Southeast

    Sub-Area: Southeast

    PARKS 2020 VISION OUTHEAST Distinctive Features Studio in the Laurelhurst Park annex is a satellite of the Montavilla Community Center. I Aquatic facilities include Sellwood, Mt. Scott, Description: The Southeast sub-area (see map at the Buckman, Montavilla and Creston. end of this section) contains many of the city's older, I established neighborhoods. This area is a patchwork of The Community Music Center is in this sub-area. older, mainly single-family neighborhoods divided by I The Southeast sub-area has three Community linear commercial corridors. The Central Eastside Schools and 45 school sites. Industrial District, which borders the east bank of the I There are lighted baseball stadiums at Willamette, separates some residential neighborhoods Westmoreland and Lents Parks. from the river. Resources and Facilities: Southeast has 898 acres Population – Current and Future: The Southeast of parkland, ranking third in total amount of park sub-area ranks first in population with 154,000 and acreage. Most parks are developed, well distributed, is projected to grow to 157,830 by 2020, an increase in good condition, and can accommodate a range of of 2%. recreational uses. I Southeast has the City’s largest combined acreage DISTRIBUTION OF SUBAREA ACRES BY PARK TYPE of neighborhood and community parks. I Southeast has a variety of habitat parks, including Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge, Tideman Johnson Park, and Johnson Creek Park that are popular sites for hiking, birding, walking, and general recreation use. I This sub-area includes part of the I-205 Bike Trail and about 4.6 miles of the Springwater Corridor, a 195-acre 16.5 mile-long regional trailway that includes many natural resources.