Minutes, Annual Parish Meeting, 2018 03

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minutes, Annual Parish Meeting, 2018 03 HAM AND STONE PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the ANNUAL PARISH MEETING held in Stone Village Hall on Monday 19 th March 2018 at 7.30pm 1. Attendance: Councillor& District Councillor P Wride Councillor E Stokes Councillor D Clark Councillor G Langdon Councillor P Case Councillor S Dunbabin Councillor C Miller County Councillor John Cordwell District Councillor Haydn Jones District Councillor Gordon Craig (after 8.30pm) Clerk: Mrs Eirian Vaughan Lewis 6 members of the public Apologies for absence – None recorded 2. Adoption of Minutes of previous meeting held on March 20th 2017 - these were accepted and signed by the Chairman as a true and accurate record of events. 3. Parish Council Chairman’s Report – Penny Wride: As Chairman of Ham and Stone Parish Council it is my pleasure to welcome to you tonight, this is your opportunity to tell us what we are doing right or wrong, and what we can do to improve the community of Ham and Stone. Jenny Nichols has stood down as clerk to Ham and Stone Parish Council and I am very pleased to introduce you to Eirian Vaughan Lewis who I know is well versed in the parish affairs. There is a major new project in Ham that is up and running and I am very pleased to be part of that is the new SGS college. It will help to address the technical skills shortage, provide a fantastic education facility for students from the age of 14 upwards and most importantly has room to expand, I would urge you to take the chance to take a look round on one of the open days. The Vale Orchard Issues have taken up much discussion; unfortunately, the developer hasn’t completed all the conditions of the original planning application. There are also problems with parking outside the school and I would urge the complainants to take it up with the former Chairman of the Governors and not the Parish Council who foresaw the problems and discussed it fully when the planning application was made. Thornbury Sort it Centre This is an ongoing saga and there are still discussions between South Gloucestershire and Gloucestershire County Council and maybe there will be a successful resolution after nearly three years of negotiations. Flooding issues I am pleased that I took Paul Helbrow the new Gloucestershire County Council Highways Officer for the area, around the parish. Over the Christmas holidays Lower Stone was badly affected and there were many contractors working to resolve the problems, which may continue for a while longer. Lisa Ellis our SDC Neighbourhood warden did visit many householders who were affected and made welfare checks and highways came around delivering sandbags to help protect properties. Lower Stone Lane has had some remedial work done over the last couple of weeks and we hope that it will solve the flooding around and in Pound Cottage. There are also some problems that Wessex Water is trying to solve with the pumping station in the dippy on the Stone Woodford border. We must pass on our condolences to the Booth family over the sad demise of Cis, Basil’s wife, she was for many years an unofficial clerk to the PC taking messages passing information about village issues and taking a photographic record of recent history in Stone and I hope that the PC will be able to access some copies of her photos to keep track on how the parish has changed over the 60+years she lived in Hall Farm. Thanks must go to Naomi Sergeant for running litter busters, volunteers are always welcome if you can help Naomi please contact her. The Stalkingham News would not be as successful without the hard work of the two Sues, Chopping and Angus. With all the chaos of the last year we haven’t missed an issue and got it out on time so it obviously a good team. Any-one can put an article forward for inclusion and we always welcome articles that are not time sensitive for filling up a page. Finally I must thank our parish Councillors for their support, my fellow District Councillors Haydn and Gordon and John Cordwell our County Councillor for his input. 4. District Councillor Report – Penny Wride: I have attended most meetings in Hamfallow, Hinton, Alkington, and tried to go to the Slimbridge meetings that didn’t clash with our own Ham & Stone Parish Council meetings. And the majority of Stroud District Council Meetings both full and committee. I regret that Berkeley Town Council meetings always clash with our meetings; hence the reason Gordon Craig cannot easily attend ours. Ham and Stone Parish Council is one of the lower precepts in the Stroud Council area, I am on the audit and standards committee and the community services committee, which are very interesting and give me the chance to challenge the spending and promoting the services that make a difference to people who live in the district. The budget of the District Council has been restricted and there have been staff reductions. The coalition who are the lead have spent some of the Council reserves and still think that they can spend money on vanity projects like the Sub Rooms, cultural and arts projects which bring in very little return to the Council coffers and then they reduce the grants such as those available to Citizens advice bureaux which does so much to help anyone in difficulty in the District. Planning Department has undergone some staff changes and the enforcement officers are being reduced, this is something that many Councillors are very concerned about, already we have noticed problems and planning conditions that need to be properly enforced. Some of the spare/empty Council offices at Ebley Mill have been rented out to raise some income but it will be beholden to the opposition Councillors like me to ensure that the budget is spent wisely and only on vital projects and not vanity projects. It will be a very difficult couple of years until the next election in 2020 but please be assured that I will work hard to make sure that the Council are aware that not every -thing revolves around Stroud and Stonehouse. Among the concerns that I have done for local residents have been planning issues, security, planning breaches and illegal trading ensuring that the new rubbish service Ubico fulfils its contract in our area we did have an on –going problem with some remoter houses being forgotten and that our waste bins were also not emptied promptly. Gordon, Haydn and I work very closely and are aware of the issues in our ward which is one of the largest in Stroud District from here to beyond Cambridge on this side of the A38. When I take people around Ham and Stone they are always surprised at how far reaching it is.But I know the ward very well so be assured that we try very hard to be aware of all that is going on and make sure that all is well in it. We are happy to be contacted and our details are on the back of the Stalkingham News.If you have any questions happy to take them. Vale Orchard update – District Councillors Penny Wride and Hayden Jones The Site Visit took place today. The Planning Officer agreed that the plot is outside the Village Envelope for development. The Badger Sett filled with concrete; Environment Officer concerned that licence for new settlement should have been granted by Natural England but will double check. The footpath appears to be in breach of conditions, Enforcement Officer to be called in to enforce with PROW. Management Co name was given to Officers but is it name only – Planning Officer will investigate. The previous developer’s name still on the business, although gone into liquidation. The Bat Roost apparently not secured into the ground. 5. County Councillors Report – John Cordwell: Mr Cordwell was invited to speak so he could give his Report and then leave to attend the Annual Parish Meeting in Kingswood: County Council Elections, May 2017 The Conservatives now have an overall majority on the County Council, having gained a net six seats from the previous position. Liberal Democrats retained all 14 seats they held and with all the same councillors! The composition now is: Conservative: 31; Liberal Democrats: 14; Labour: 5; Green Party: 2; PAB; 1. The outcome of this was that the Conservatives took all the Cabinet places and increased the size of the Cabinet from 8 to 9. With one exception, which the administration are not allowed to hold they took all the chairmanships of council committees including Planning which I previously held. All formal Shadow Cabinet positions were abolished. My roles on the County Council My committee memberships remain unchanged and I continue as my group’s lead member on these. (Environment & Communities Scrutiny Committee, Planning, Commons and Rights of Way, and Traffic Regulations Orders committees.) I also became a member of Gloucestershire’s Local Access Forum. I was previously a member of the Highways Contracts Advisory Group. This was replaced by a Highways Cabinet Panel, which I joined, to monitor the awarding of the three new highways contracts. I am one of the county’s two representatives on the Berkeley Site Stakeholder Group. I also chair the Stroud Road Safety Liaison Committee. More widely I continue as a representative on South West Councils and its Resources and Management Committee, and on the Severn Estuary Partnership. County Council Budget 2018/19 The council has had to absorb a continuing year on year reduction in Government revenue support grant.
Recommended publications
  • Wotton Under Edge
    SELECT ROLL 82 GLOUCESTERSHIRE Indented extract made on the 10th day of May in the 23rd year of the reign of our lady Elizabeth, by the grace of God, queen of England, France & Ireland, defender of the faith, etc. Of all sums of money chargeable on anyone living within the boundary of the hundreds of Berkeley, Grumbald's Ash, Thornbury, Henbury, Pucklechurch and Barton in the county aforesaid, at the first payment of the subsidy from the laity granted by act of the parliament held at Westminster in the 23rd year of the reign of the said lady queen, ratified, assessed & taxed before us, Sir Thomas Porter & Thomas Throckmorton, esq., by virtue of the said lady queen's commission, together with others directed in that matter; whereof one part is to be handed over and delivered to Edward Trotman, gent., the head or chief collector of the hundreds aforesaid, named and appointed for the levying of the sums specified in the same extract [which are] to be paid for the work and use of the said lady queen; the other part of the aforesaid extract is to be handed over and delivered to the barons of the exchequer of the said lady queen, according to the tenor of the said act of parliament, to be kept together with the obligatory document of the said collector annexed to these presents certified under our seals abovementioned, which certain sums, together with names and surnames of anyone chargeable within the hundreds & boundaries aforesaid, with their place of abode, follows after. LAND GOODS ASSESSMENT £ s d BERKELEY HUNDRED Berkeley William BUTCHER £3 8 0 Richard BUTCHER 40s 5 4 Richard HIX 40s 5 4 Margaret HIX, infant £3 8 0 Thomas NEALE £5 8 4 William BOWER £4 6 8 Maurice TEISOME £3 5 0 Robert TOWNSEND £3 5 0 Maurice ATWOOD £3 5 0 Richard HERRINGE £3 5 0 TOTAL £3 1s 8d Arlingham Paid Jane WESTWARD £5 13 4 Richard YATE, gent.
    [Show full text]
  • Stroud Labour Party
    Gloucestershire County Council single member ward review Response from Stroud Constituency Labour Party Introduction On 30 November the Local Government Boundary Commission started its second period of consultation for a pattern of divisions for Gloucestershire. Between 30 November and 21 February the Commission is inviting comments on the division boundaries for GCC. Following the completion of its initial consultation, the Commission has proposed that the number of county councillors should be reduced from 63 to 53. The districts have provided the estimated numbers for the electorate in their areas in 2016; the total number for the county is 490,674 so that the average electorate per councillor would be 9258 (cf. 7431 in 2010). The main purpose of this note is to draw attention to the constraints imposed on proposals for a new pattern of divisions in Stroud district, which could lead to anomalies, particularly in ‘bolting together’ dissimilar district wards and parishes in order to meet purely numerical constraints. In it own words ‘the Commission aims to recommend a pattern of divisions that achieves good electoral equality, reflects community identities and interests and provides for effective and convenient local government. It will also seek to use strong, easily-identifiable boundaries. ‘Proposals should demonstrate how any pattern of divisions aids the provision of effective and convenient local government and why any deterioration in equality of representation or community identity should be accepted. Representations that are supported by evidence and argument will carry more weight with the Commission than those which merely assert a point of view.’ While a new pattern of ten county council divisions is suggested in this note, it is not regarded as definitive but does contain ways of avoiding some possible major anomalies.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOUCESTERSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a photograph GLOUCESTERSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position GL_AVBF05 SP 102 149 UC road (was A40) HAMPNETT West Northleach / Fosse intersection on the verge against wall GL_AVBF08 SP 1457 1409 A40 FARMINGTON New Barn Farm by the road GL_AVBF11 SP 2055 1207 A40 BARRINGTON Barrington turn by the road GL_AVGL01 SP 02971 19802 A436 ANDOVERSFORD E of Andoversford by Whittington turn (assume GL_SWCM07) GL_AVGL02 SP 007 187 A436 DOWDESWELL Kilkenny by the road GL_BAFY07 ST 6731 7100 A4175 OLDLAND West Street, Oldland Common on the verge almost opposite St Annes Drive GL_BAFY07SL ST 6732 7128 A4175 OLDLAND Oldland Common jct High St/West Street on top of wall, left hand side GL_BAFY07SR ST 6733 7127 A4175 OLDLAND Oldland Common jct High St/West Street on top of wall, right hand side GL_BAFY08 ST 6790 7237 A4175 OLDLAND Bath Road, N Common; 50m S Southway Drive on wide verge GL_BAFY09 ST 6815 7384 UC road SISTON Siston Lane, Webbs Heath just South Mangotsfield turn on verge GL_BAFY10 ST 6690 7460 UC road SISTON Carsons Road; 90m N jcn Siston Hill on the verge GL_BAFY11 ST 6643 7593 UC road KINGSWOOD Rodway Hill jct Morley Avenue against wall GL_BAGL15 ST 79334 86674 A46 HAWKESBURY N of A433 jct by the road GL_BAGL18 ST 81277 90989 A46 BOXWELL WITH LEIGHTERTON near Leighterton on grass bank above road GL_BAGL18a ST 80406 89691 A46 DIDMARTON Saddlewood Manor turn by the road GL_BAGL19 ST 823 922 A46 BOXWELL WITH LEIGHTERTON N of Boxwell turn by the road GL_BAGL20 ST 8285 9371 A46 BOXWELL WITH LEIGHTERTON by Lasborough turn on grass verge GL_BAGL23 ST 845 974 A46 HORSLEY Tiltups End by the road GL_BAGL25 ST 8481 9996 A46 NAILSWORTH Whitecroft by former garage (maybe uprooted) GL_BAGL26a SO 848 026 UC road RODBOROUGH Rodborough Manor by the road Registered Charity No 1105688 1 Entries in red - require a photograph GLOUCESTERSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamfallow Parish Council
    DRAFT CONSULTATION RESPONSE TO STROUD DISTRICT COUNCIL’S DRAFT LOCAL PLAN CONSULTATION, NOVEMBER 2019, FROM HAMFALLOW PARISH COUNCIL 1. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on your latest version of the Stroud District Draft Local Plan. Hamfallow Councillors have attended the exhibitions and discussions that have been arranged by yourselves and by Ridge, the developer of the proposals for new housing in our area. We have also attended meetings of the local action group, BASRAG, to gauge public opinion on your Plan. 2. In this regard, we would also point out that in our last joint Hamfallow/Hinton Parish Plan, on which we consulted parishioners, less than 2% of respondents favoured clusters of over 100 houses in their parish. As a result, our parishes committed in that Plan to fight large scale developments and to push for sizeable starter/affordable home components in any developments that do take place. 3. Please note that we also commented on the earlier “Emerging Strategy” a year ago and we are very disappointed not to have received any response to the detailed comments we made (attached for ease of reference). None of the concerns we expressed have been addressed in the current draft Plan and so all our earlier comments still apply as comments on the current draft plan. We would like to have proper responses to the issues raised below, and those in our previous response, within 28 days of the close of this consultation. 4. We are very disappointed that the essentials of the new Plan seem almost the same as the previous version we criticised, as in point 3 above.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents
    Helping older people in Gloucestershire feel more independent, secure, and have a better quality of life May 2014 Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents Managed by GRCC Jointly funded by Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group www.villageagents.org.uk Helping older people in Gloucestershire feel more independent, secure, and have a better quality of life Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents Managed by GRCC Jointly funded by Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Gloucestershire Village and Key objectives: To give older people easy Community Agents is aimed 3 access to a wide range of primarily at the over 50s but also To help older people in information that will enable them offers assistance to vulnerable 1 Gloucestershire feel more to make informed choices about people in the county. independent, secure, cared for, their present and future needs. and have a better quality of life. The agents provide information To engage older people to To promote local services and support to help people stay 4 enable them to influence and groups, enabling the independent, expand their social 2 future planning and provision. Agent to provide a client with a activities, gain access to a wide community-based solution To provide support to range of services and keep where appropriate. people over the age of 18 involved with their local 5 who are affected by cancer. communities. Partner agencies ² Gloucestershire County Council’s Adult Social Care Helpdesk ² Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group ² Gloucestershire Rural Community
    [Show full text]
  • Slimbridge Village Design Statement 2016
    Slimbridge Village Design Statement 2016 “When we see Slimbridge Spire we know we are home.” 1 Contents Slimbridge Parish Boundary Map ………………………………………………………………………………………….Page 3 Location of Slimbridge within Stroud District (map) ……………………………………………………………..Page 4 Introduction What is a Village Design Statement (VDS) ………………………………………………………………..Page 5 Why produce a VDS for Slimbridge Parish ………………………………………………………………..Page 5 How will it work? …………………………………………………………………………………………………….Page 6 Who is the VDS for? ………………………………………………………………………………………………...Page 6 How has it been produced? ……………………………………………………………………………………..Page 6 1 The Parish Context 1.1 Geographical setting …………………………………………………………………………………………Page 7 1.2 Community and Facilities ………………………………………………………………………………….Page 11 1.3 Economy ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….Page 12 1.4 Infrastructure …………………………………………………………………………………………………..Page 14 2 The Distinctive Character of the Parish 2.1 Landscape and Natural Environment …………………………………………………………………Page 16 2.2 Historical Development …………………………………………………………………………………….Page 20 2.3 Movement Routes ……………………………………………………………………………………………Page 22 3 Settlements in the Parish 3.1 Setting in the Landscape …………………………………………………………………………………..Page 24 3.2 Settlement Pattern …………………………………………………………………………………………..Page 24 3.3 Buildings and Space ………………………………………………………………………………………….Page 24 3.4 Listed Buildings ……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 25 3.5 Building Materials …………………………………………………………………………………………….Page 27 3.6 Distinctive Features ………………………………………………………………………………………….Page
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire County Council
    GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) Order 2015 Proposed development at Berkeley Nuclear Power Station, Hamfield Lane, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, GL13 9PA. Retrospective installation of plant and structures required in connection with decommissioning and the Active Waste Vaults Retrieval Programme. Application No. 19/0063/STMAJW. I give NOTICE that Magnox Limited is applying for planning permission to Gloucestershire County Council. Members of the public may inspect electronic copies of • the application, • the plans • and other documents submitted with it at either Stroud District Council, Ebley Mill, Westward Road, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 4UB or Gloucestershire County Council, Planning & Development Unit, Shire Hall, Gloucester GL1 2TH, during all reasonable hours, or online at www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/planningonline. Notification of the application has also been forwarded to Ham And Stone Parish Council, Hamfallow Parish Council, Berkeley Town Council and Lydney Town Council. Anyone who wishes to make representations on planning grounds to this proposal need to in writing. Comments can be submitted online at www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/planningonline, by email to [email protected] or by letter to the Planning and Development Unit at the above address by 24th October 2019. You should be aware that under the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 all correspondence received can be made available for inspection by the applicant or any interested third party on request. This ADVERTISEMENT has been displayed by Gloucestershire County Council to publicise that the above planning application has been made. Simon Excell Lead Commissioner: Strategic Infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Analysis Part 2 V5 Berkeley Cluster
    Stroud Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study (Berkeley Sub Area Analysis - Part 2 of 2) 0 Stroud Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study Berkeley Cluster Sub Area Analysis Report (Part 2 of 2) Final June 2019 Stroud Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study (Berkeley Sub Area Analysis - Part 2 of 2) 1 Contents Page no 1. Geographical Area and Population 2-3 2. Existing Provision of Open Space and GI 3-10 3. Analysis of existing quantity of open space and GI 11-13 4. Analysis of existing access to open space and GI 14-23 5. Open Space and GI Quality Assessment 23-32 6. Future need for open space and GI corridors and opportunities 32-37 7. Open Space and GI - Summary of priorities for the area 38-40 Stroud Open Space and Green Infrastructure Study (Berkeley Sub Area Analysis - Part 2 of 2) 2 1.0 Geographical area and population The Berkeley sub area comprises the Parishes of Alkington, Berkeley, Ham and Stone, Hamfallow, Hinton and Slimbridge as shown in figure 1. The population of this area is 7,146 (ONS mid-year estimate 2017). Figure 1 Berkeley cluster The Local Plan Review Emerging Strategy (2018) provides a summary of this area as follows: This cluster of parishes lies in the Severn Vale at the south-western corner of Stroud District, close to the boundary between Gloucestershire and South Gloucestershire. Berkeley is a historic market town, which today acts as a local service centre for a rural hinterland. Many residents of these parishes commute out of the District for work, leisure and anything other than convenience shopping (Bristol and Thornbury are within easy reach).
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Nuclear Site Licences for Bnfl/Magnox
    Health & Safety Executive Direct ciix U151 951 4-1-5 :<:,L.... - ,>.: .... ~~. .d Y~..~.. Dircct 1:ix 0151 951 -1163 File I<-L 1 SI'C 12: 2i I2 S l \l'(.'l2.; 25 l:J IIVL:? Your Ref: Date: 26 Ji~ni. 199s Dear Sir APPLICATION FOR NCCLE.-\R SITE LICENCES FOR RNI;Ll\lAGXOS INTEGR4TION 111 accordance \\-it11 Section 3(3) o!' the Nuclear Installations ..\et I9Gj (as anxnded). the Health and Snfst! Executi\e liereby tlirccts you to serve on thc bodies described in the attached Sclietlule. notice that British Xiiclear Fuels plc 113s applied for a nuclear sire licence in respect of Berksley and Berkeley Ccntre. I'iirther. the IHealtli'nntl Sat'cty Executive specifies that cach noticc slioi~lclgive the follo\ving particulars: l. the location of the site. its Ix~lindar!. ailcl map reference: 4. a stiltelllent of ~pr~cedurcsto ensure the safe disposd ol'liqi~id.yaseous nnd solid efll~~eiitsaiid wastes. inclilcling espcctctl qiinntitics: 5. a statcnlent ot'yoi~rpI;liis k)r deiilii~g\\-it11 e~iici-g~~~ciesi~~sociat.cd wit11 acii\ities on tlic Iicc~~scJsiic a1111 the iiss~cii~icilliaison nrrciiigc~iisiits.noting tliat tlic cmersency plw \\ill hc si~hmittcclin ilic I~lcc~ltl~mcl Sakty Executive hrapproual: ~T- --'- 6131 Dcpue Chief lnspcctor (Sitclcar Inst:~II:~tions) l The Chief Exccutive 7 The Chief Executive Gloucester County Council Monrnoutlishire County Council 3 The Chief Executive 4 The Chief Executive South Gloucestershire Council Forest of Dean District Council 5 The Chief Executive 6 The Chief Executive Stroud District Council Tewkesbury
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY OIF' PARTICUL-,ARS 2 8 FEB Reyf' S. LBC/993 & Llilfln L
    2 PLLANNNNG APPL.ICATIONS -- SUMMARY OIF' PARTICUL-,ARS 8 FEB Reyf' S. LBC/993 & LLILflN L.NENfleDL'I~ESS CL.ASS : LBA Gloucestershire County Council SCHEDULE REF ? GCC N R Rampton Proper-ty Services Depar-tment PARISH : WARE' 3 STROUD Shire Hatl GLoucester- GLi 2TQ L~ENL2Y~b1ELaULL.eDDEESS MAP REFERENCES & EDITIONS S0 8405 SW A The Firs, 108 Cainscross Road, Stroud P'ARCELS: DESCEIEIIODE....EEOEflSEa..DEL.~~~~~~~~~ELO2bENI F'~~/TS OF:R Internal alterations to waiting area and entr-ance of building. GRIDi REF: SO 8405 0518 DATE RCNl 9/2/89 EXPRY DT: 6/4/89 -< ~~~~~~~~~SITEAREA: -...... ............... .. SURFACE WALLS FOUJL. …- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - BASIC INFORMATION CONSULTATIONS ....... …...I ±D E IE Mso I.... AN. .. MQ . -..----------- L-------EXEC- C...u..~a..L... ..... CD...........AIaLS--IC----...- en~~L~AzDNT.. ~.......... U1L....E ---------. A tflI----ti. ... ... S~~EEL3E~~~DSR..w. i.flE: 4 .Q1--~~~~~..-..... ucu........tg... ...... ... .. ANeIUSE.SESI.. .IIEEE....CD~~~~~~~~'LNSENIOi.. ... -IOWN~~~?jE.ke.J....yILISIDI~~~~~~G .......Y..... ILDuNI.CJL.LANS ... ....... ….... ~~~rrug. 4 ~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~E6!.k.L.Z..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . £.~~~............. 'OF.R.W DElA------------- ------------- ------. £........ ;t L e tt-.-- ------------------ ~-- ----- - E:-------NCIL............... -. HERcL'EIeILSI..... ... ial~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CUIIECIs.A?aNEL.~~~~.. .. ... L...-2.LaIIONeLI2usx~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~.-.... .... J ........ .I W........... ... ........... .~.. .......NIx~. ....... - --------------_
    [Show full text]
  • HAM and STONE PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting Held at Stone Village Hall on Monday 17Th September 2018 1
    HAM AND STONE PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held at Stone Village Hall On Monday 17 th September 2018 1. Attendance: Councillor G Langdon Councillor D Clark Councillor E Stokes Councillor S Dunbabin Councillor C Miller Clerk: Mrs E V Lewis County Councillor J Cordwell Apologies: Received from Cllr & District Cllr P Wride and Cllr P Case 2. Public Forum No members of the public present . 3. Members Register of Interests – None reported 4. Minutes of the Meetings held on July 16th 2018 - confirmed as an accurate record and signed by the Vice Chairman. 5. To note County Councillors Report – John Cordwell: County Council meeting 12 th September The motions considered and the outcomes were: Accessibility through the Shire Hall complex (Lab/Lib): To carry out an audit and implement the findings to make it easier for people with disabilities get around the buildings. (This was tabled for the previous meeting, but the time allowed for motions had run out.) Unanimous support. Call for a People’s Vote on Brexit (Lib Dem): Seeking County Council support for this to take place. Conservatives all voted against, so it fell. The rest voted for the motion apart from two Labour abstentions. Diabetes (Lib Dem): The motion refers specifically to Type 1 diabetes and calls on the County Council to coordinate an awareness campaign on its symptoms and dangers with Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group and Gloucestershire’s schools, including academies. Unanimous support with a minor amendment that it should also go to the Health and Care Overview Scrutiny Committee. Ethical Care Charter (Labour): Asking the Council to sign up to this charter to support the “committed but poorly paid and treated” homecare workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Land Availability 2020
    Stroud District Employment Land Availability As at 1st April 2020 The Planning Strategy Team Development Services Stroud District Council Ebley Mill Stroud Gloucestershire GL5 4UB 01453 754143 [email protected] Contents 1. Background 1 2. Survey methodology 1 3. Summary of survey results 2 Summary of Employment Land Supply: Position at 31st March Table 1 3 2020 Completions: Employment land gain with B use classes (1st April Table 2a 4 2019 to 31st March 2020) Completions: Employment land gain with B use class (October Table 2b 4 2006 to 31st March 2019) Table 3a Commitments: Non-allocated sites at 1st April 2020 9 Table 3b Commitments: Allocated sites at 1st April 2020 10 Losses: Actual loss of employment land (1st April 2019 to 31st Table 4a 11 March 2020) Losses: Actual loss of employment land (October 2006 to 31st Table 4b 11 March 2020) Potential employment land losses: Non-allocated sites as at 1st Table 4c 13 April 2020 Potential employment land losses: Allocated sites at 1st April Table 4d 14 2020 Employment allocations in the adopted Local Plan as at 1st April Table 5a 15 2020 Stroud District Employment Land Availability as at 1st April 2020 Page | 1 1. Background 1.1 All district councils in Gloucestershire undertake employment land availability (ELA) surveys to monitor the supply of employment land. This monitoring work is carried out annually and is essential for the evidence base supporting the adopted Local Plan. 1.2 This ELA survey covers the period 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2020. 1.3 The adopted Local Plan covers the period 2006 to 2031.
    [Show full text]