Bne:Newspaper
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Resignation of Aivaras Abromavicius, the Lithuanian- Born Economy Minister: No to Corruption
Resignation of Aivaras Abromavicius, the Lithuanian- born economy minister: No to corruption HRWF (09.02.2016) - Aivaras Abromavicius, the Lithuanian-born technocratic economy minister, resigned last week saying implementing reforms had become impossible. He accused a long-time ally of President Petro Poroshenko of pressing him to appoint cronies to state-controlled companies and to his ministry. His resignation lays bare Ukraine’s continuing failure, two years after the “Maidan” uprising, to curb corruption and establish the rule of law. This resignation is a political disaster for both President Poroshenko and Prime Minister Yatseniuk. It is also a disaster for the Ministry of Economic Development too – for there were several good Deputy Ministers unlikely to remain either. The name of Igor Kononenko is often mentioned as the hidden hand of President Poroshenko behind the Ukrainian political curtain. This presidential “enforcer” has been a long-term business partner and accomplice of Poroshenko. The Odessablog predicted the ‘departure’ of Minister Abromavicius That the maneuvering of Mr Abromavicius out of the Ministry of Economic Development would occur prior to any privatisation of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) was predicted by the Odessablog after mid-January: “His removal as Minister from the ministry that will oversee such matters was clearly a matter of necessity for the dark powers behind the Ukrainian political curtain. An honest man and a squeaky clean privatisation of SOEs is clearly not in their interests – even if an honest man controlling a squeaky clean privatisation programme is unquestionably in the interests of Ukraine. The issue was how to remove Mr Abromavicius from the privatisation and SOE management appointment process when he was and is so highly thought of by Ukrainian civil society, society, and major donor nations to Ukraine. -
Turkey Into the Abyss? Suna Erdem on Whether Turkey’S Politicians Can Prevent a Catastrophe from Unfolding
Inside this issue: Out of Africa for Russian banking exile Jennings Mattoni puts the fizz into Central European waters Slovakia’s Fico told to take November 2015 www.bne.eu his trousers down GBP 4.50/USD 6.75/EUR 5.90 Turkey into the abyss? Suna Erdem on whether Turkey’s politicians can prevent a catastrophe from unfolding Special Report: Ben Aris looks at Georgian PM CEE/CIS Bank Moscow Exchange’s Garibashvili Survey 2015 revival p. 12 talks China, p. 28 Russia and trade p. 60 ISSN 2059-2736 ISSN bne November 2015 Contents I 3 Senior editorial board Ben Aris (Moscow) +7 9162903400 editor-in-chief [email protected] 20 10 James R Hammond (Boston) +1 6178525441 publisher [email protected] Nicholas Watson (Prague) +42 0731582719 managing editor [email protected] Robert Anderson (Prague) +42 0603517867 news editor [email protected] Liam Halligan (London) +44 7801799279 editor-at-large [email protected] Central Asia 15 Naubet Bisenov (Almaty) +7 7015933810 bureau chief [email protected] Eastern Europe 6 THE MONTH THAT WAS 28 SPECIAL REPORT – Nicholas Allen (Berlin) +49 15730395872 CEE/CIS Bank Survey 2015 bureau chief [email protected] Central Europe COMPANIES & MARKETS Tim Gosling (Prague) +42 0720180811 36 COVER FEATURE bureau chief [email protected] 10 Out of Africa for Russia Southeast Europe banking exile Jennings Turkey into the abyss? Clare Nuttall (Bucharest) +7 7073011495 bureau chief [email protected] 11 Russia’s central bank limits foreign shareholder voting Advertising & subscription CENTRAL EUROPE Elena Arbuzova (Moscow) +7 9160015510 business -
Why Is Progress Towards Rule of Law So Challenging? the Cases of Ukraine and Moldova
Why Is Progress Towards Rule of Law So Challenging? The Cases of Ukraine and Moldova Why Is Progress Towards Rule of Law So Challenging? The Cases of Ukraine and Moldova John Lough and Iulian Rusu Why Is Progress Towards Rule of Law So Challenging? ABOUT THE AUTHORS John Lough is an associate fellow of the Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham House and is the co-author of several reports of the Chatham House Ukraine Forum, including its inaugural publication (with Iryna Solonenko) Can Ukraine Achieve a Reform Breakthrough? (2016). He is also the author of the Chatham House report The Influence of Systema in Ukraine (forthcoming). Iulian Rusu is deputy executive director of the Institute for European Policies and Reforms in Chisinau where he is responsible for the justice, rule of law and DCFTA sectors as well as the preparation of shadow progress reports on the implementation of the EU-Moldova Association Agreement. The authors are grateful to Oksana Basystyuk who provided valuable assistance with the research for this study. 4 Contents Contents 1. Instead of a preface: Why (read) this study? 6 2. Introduction 9 2.1 What is rule of law? 9 2.2 The west’s loss of allure 9 2.3 Scale of the challenge in Ukraine and Moldova 10 2.4 Serving leaders, not citizens 11 2.5 Entrenched interests thwart real change 11 3. Ukraine 16 3.1 The Yanukovych legacy 16 3.2 After the revolution, brakes on progress 17 3.3 Justice sector reforms 2014–2020 18 3.3.1 Halting start for new anti-corruption bodies 18 3.3.2 Judiciary 19 3.3.3 Prosecution Service 21 3.3.4 Police 22 3.3.5 Security Service (SBU) 23 3.4 Half measures yield predictable results 23 3.5 Lessons learned 24 4. -
2009 Trial Monitoring Report Azerbaijan N a J I a B R E Z A
2009 TRIAL MONITORING REPORT AZERBAIJAN REPOR 2009 TRIAL T AZERBAIJAN MONIT ORING 2009 TRIAL MONITORING REPORT AZERBAIJAN © OSCE Office in Baku - i - Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ ii List of Abbreviations.................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Scope of the Report. Methodology............................................................................................................... 6 I. Observance of Fair Trial and Rights of the Defendants....................................................................... 9 1.1. The Right to a Public Hearing..................................................................................................... 9 1.2. Presence at Hearings: Defendant, Defence Counsel and Prosecutor ........................................ 11 1.3. The Right to be Informed of the Charges and the Right not to Incriminate Oneself ................ 13 1.4. Duty to Effectively Investigate Allegations of Ill-Treatment ................................................... 21 1.5. The Right to an Independent and Impartial Tribunal................................................................ 25 1.6. The Right to be Presumed Innocent......................................................................................... -
Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional Crisis
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2019 Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional Crisis Nicholas Pehlman The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3073 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional Crisis by Nicholas Pehlman A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 © Copyright by Nick Pehlman, 2018 All rights reserved ii Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional Crisis by Nicholas Pehlman This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Mark Ungar Chair of Examining Committee Date Alyson Cole Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Julie George Jillian Schwedler THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Police Reform in Ukraine Since the Euromaidan: Police Reform in Transition and Institutional -
Severe Torture and Unfair Trials of Members of the Nardaran Community
Azerbaijan: Severe Torture and Unfair Trials of Members of the Nardaran Community The World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), requests your urgent intervention in the following situation in Azerbaijan. Description of the situation: The OMCT has been informed by reliable sources about severe torture and unfair trials in the cases of 18 members of the Shiite minority of Nardaran including Mr. Taleh Bagirzadeh, Mr. Jahad Balakishiev, Mr. Shamil Abdylaliev, and Mr. Bahruz Askerov. They were arrested on 26 November 2015 during a special operation of the Main Directorate for Combating Organized Crime in Nardaran in an attempt to crack down the Muslim Unity, a Shiite organisation that presents an Islamist alternative to the State. In this so-called “Nardaran case”, the arrested are charged with serious crimes including murder, terrorism, riots, illegal possession of weapons, violent seizure of power, incitement to religious hatred. According to information received by his lawyer, Mr Taleh Bagirzadeh the head of Muslim Unity, was arrested and was brought to a van where officers proceeded in hitting his face, smashing his head on the ground, trying to break his back and verbally abusing him. Mr. Bagirzadeh was subsequently brought to the offices of the Main Organized Crime Department where he was forced to lay on the ground and was severely beaten resulting in blood loss and open flesh wounds. Two to three days after his arrest, an investigator from the General Prosecutor’s office visited Mr. Bagirzadeh and expressed shock about his condition. However, no investigation was initiated. During his arbitrary detention on the premises of the Organized Crime Department, Mr. -
Interim Report Оn Presidential Elections 2019 Part II
NGO «EUROPEAN COORDINATION COUNCIL» IN COLLABORATION WITH «SENATE OF PUBLIC WARDING» are monitoring the election of the President of Ukraine in 2019 as official observers, in accordance with the Resolution of the Central Election Commission No. 50 dated January 11, 2019. Interim Report оn Presidential Elections 2019 Part II Kyiv 2019 NGO “EUROPEAN COORDINATION COUNCIL” NGO “SENATE OF PUBLIC WARDING”Ā CONTENT Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 І. Registration of the candidates to the post as President of Ukraine, basic themes of the election programs, their main points…....................................................................5 Zelenskyi Volodymyr Oleksandrovych .............................................................................6 Tymoshenko Yuliya Volodymyrivna ................................................................................7 Poroshenko Petro Oleksiyovych ........................................................................................8 Boiko Yurii Anatoliyovych ................................................................................................9 Grytsenko Anatolii Stepanovych ......................................................................................10 Lyashko Oleg Valeriyovych .............................................................................................11 Murayev Evgenii Volodymyrovych .................................................................................12 -
A Hypothesis on Banking and Democracy: Explaining Change in Ukraine’S Political Regime
A HYPOTHESIS ON BANKING AND DEMOCRACY: EXPLAINING CHANGE IN UKRAINE’S POLITICAL REGIME by Erik Fertsman Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia December 2020 © Copyright by Erik Fertsman, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………………………………. iv LIST OF FIGURES …………………………………………………………………………….... v ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………….... vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USD …………………………………………………………..... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………. viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………….... 1 1.1 OVERVIEW …………………………………………………………………………….... 1 1.2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK……………………………………………………….. 7 1.2.1 Theories on Post-Soviet Political Regimes …………………………………………. 7 1.2.2 Banks as a Resource for Political Groups in Ukraine ……………………………... 11 1.3 METHODOLOGY …………………………………………………………………….... 13 1.3.1 Hypothesis generation …………………………………………………………….. 13 1.3.2 General-to-specific (“GETS”) Approach …………………………………………. 13 1.3.3 Data ……………………………………………………………………………….. 14 1.3.4 Terms………………………………………………………………………………. 15 1.4 LIMITATIONS………………………………………………………………………….. 16 1.5 OUTLINE ………………………………………………………………………………. 18 CHAPTER 2. THEORIES ON POST-SOVIET POLITICAL REGIMES ……………………... 20 2.1 MASS ATTITUDES, CULTURE, HISTORY, AND SOCIAL CLEAVAGES …………. 20 2.2 INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN……………………………………………………………. 22 2.3 TRANSNATIONAL DIFFUSION ……………………………………………………... 27 2.4 ELITES (BALANCE THEORY) ………………………………………………………. 29 2.5 SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………………….. 36 -
Revolution and Reform in Ukraine EVALUATING FOUR YEARS of REFORM
ITRevolution DOES and Reform NOT in Ukraine MATTEREvaluating Four Years of Reform HOW SLOWBy Silviya Nitsova, Grigore Pop-Eleches, YOU and Graeme RobertsonGO LNG AS YOU DON'T STOP PONARS Eurasia July 2018 Revolution and Reform in Ukraine EVALUATING FOUR YEARS OF REFORM JULY 2018 Silviya Nitsova University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Grigore Pop-Eleches Princeton University Graeme Robertson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill PONARS Eurasia is an international network of scholars advancing new approaches to research on security, politics, economics, and society in Russia and Eurasia. PONARS Eurasia is based at the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES) at the George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs. This publication was made possible in part by a grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. Program Directors: Henry E. Hale and Marlene Laruelle Managing Editor: Alexander Schmemann Senior Research Associate: Sufian Zhemukhov Program Associate: William McHenry PONARS Eurasia Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES) Elliott School of International Affairs The George Washington University 1957 E Street NW, Suite 412 Washington, DC 20052 Tel: (202) 994-6340 www.ponarseurasia.org Cover image: Shutterstock/Vadven 393132940 © PONARS Eurasia 2018. All rights reserved Executive Summary In February 2014, Ukraine grabbed the world’s attention with its second revolution in a decade. The corrupt and increasingly authoritarian administration of President Viktor Yanukovych was overthrown. After the revolution, Ukraine embarked upon a wide- ranging series of economic and governance reforms. In this volume, we assess the progress of these reforms and analyze the main factors that explain the successes and failures we see. -
Health Concern/Fear of Torture Or Ill-Treatment/Legal Concern
PUBLIC AI Index: EUR 55/004/2006 04 August 2006 UA 209/06 Health concern/Fear of torture or ill-treatment/Legal Concern AZERBAIJAN Ruslan Bashirli (m) ] Said Nuri (m) ] members of Yeni Fikir youth movement Ramin Tagiyev (m) ] Ruslan Bashirli, Said Nuri and Ramin Tagiyev, members of a political youth movement, Yeni Fikir (‘New Idea’), were convicted of plotting to violently overthrow the government, after an unfair trial. Both Ruslan Bashirli and Ramin Tagiyev are at risk of torture or other ill-treatment in detention. According to reports, Ruslan Bashirli is not receiving the medical treatment he needs for head injuries allegedly sustained during torture. Said Nuri, who was given a suspended sentence, is also being denied treatment for a serious medical condition. Ruslan Bashirli was arrested on 3 August 2005, Said Nuri on 12 September 2005 and Ramin Tagiyev on 16 September. Following his arrest Ruslan Bashirli was allegedly tortured at the Organized Crime Unit of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, where Azerbaijani human rights activists have previously documented cases of torture. According to his lawyer, doctors at the Bayil Prison in the capital, Baku, where Ruslan Bashirli is currently being held, suggested that he may have lost consciousness due to blows to the head. Ruslan Bashirli was also pressured to incriminate opposition politicians, which he refused to do. The three men were convicted of "actions aimed at the violent overthrow of the Azerbaijani government" under Article 278 of the Azerbaijani Criminal Code. The prosecution alleged that the three were among members of Yeni Fikir who had attended seminars organized by the American non-governmental organization the National Democratic Institute, at which strategies for overthrowing the Azerbaijani government were supposedly discussed. -
Ukraine : Démission D'un Ministre Dénonçant La Corruption
Ukraine : démission d’un ministre dénonçant la corruption Dinah Lee 05 février, 2016 Veilles Un an à peine après sa prise de fonction comme ministre du Développement Economique et du Commerce, Aivaras Abromavicius, banquier d’origine lithuanienne, a présenté sa démission le 3 février 2016. Aivaras Abromavicius a dénoncé la corruption, qui continue de gangréner l'Ukraine depuis la n de l’Union Soviétique, en ces termes : « Ni mon équipe, ni moi ne désirons plus servir de couverture à la corruption cachée, ou bien à devenir les marionnettes de ceux qui, à l’instar de l’ancien gouvernement, essaient d’exercer leur contrôle sur les fonds publics. Je n’ai pas l’intention de me rendre à Davos et de discuter de nos succès avec des investisseurs internationaux et des partenaires, tout en sachant que derrière mon dos, certains individus manigancent pour leurs intérêts propres. Ces gens ont des noms. Je voudrais en mentionner un en particulier aujourd’hui. Il s’agit d’Igor Kononenko » Ce dernier est conseiller de l’actuel président ukrainien Petro Poroshenko. Si Aivaras Abromavicius nomme Igor Kononenko, comme l'un de ceux qui entravent la marche des réformes, il s'agit surtout, pour lui, de dénoncer un système totalement corrompu. L'Ukraine siège à la 130ème position du classement de Transparency International. Dans son émission du 3 février dernier, le journaliste Savik Shuster posait la question aux députés invités sur son plateau : « Quel est le plus grand danger en Ukraine aujourd'hui ? Est-ce la guerre comme le déclarait le président Petro Poroshenko lors de sa visite en Allemagne en début de semaine ? Ou est-ce la corruption ? » Tous les invités, y compris l'ex-président géorgien devenu gouverneur d'Odessa, Mikheil Saakachvili, ont reconnu que la corruption constitue une menace grave pour le pays. -
Oligarchs in Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia As Key Obstacles to Reforms Wojciech Konończuk, Denis Cenușa and Kornely Kakachia 24 May 2017
Understanding the EU’s Association Agreements and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia Oligarchs in Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia as key obstacles to reforms Wojciech Konończuk, Denis Cenușa and Kornely Kakachia 24 May 2017 Abstract The paper reviews the role of oligarchs in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Oligarchy can be briefly defined as a system of governance in which a small and informal group of people, using their vast economic and financial resources, is able to control a state or exert a major or dominant influence on its policy. The portfolios of economic assets of the major oligarchs of the three countries is described in some detail. The nature of their influence on policy making is further analysed, in particular the disadvantages for the governance of these countries. While these impacts differ in their detail by country, in general terms they tend towards limiting political pluralism, capturing state institutions, corruption, monopolisation, and more broadly the blocking of reform processes. Oligarchs are symptoms rather than causes of weak political institutions. The remedies correspondingly need a wide reach, including institutional capacity building, effective anti-corruption bodies, suitable public funding for political parties, effective competition policy, independence of the judiciary and of the media, supported by many features of the Association Agreements and DCFTAs with the EU. Modern economies will always need major business leaders and enterprises. The challenge is precisely to bring the oligarchs into becoming normal business leaders. Wojciech Konończuk is a senior associate at the Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW) in Warsaw. Denis Cenușa is a researcher and Program Director at Expert-Grup, Chisinau.