DOCSLIB.ORG

Poole and Wareham Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poole and Wareham Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy Poole and Wareham Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy Statement of Environmental Particulars Final March 2015 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2014 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 10 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 The Environment during the development of the Plan ................................................................. 4 Mitigation and enhancement........................................................................................................ 4 Consultation responses ............................................................................................................... 7 Trans-boundary consultation responses ...................................................................................... 8 Reasons for selecting the adopted plan in light of reasonable alternatives .................................. 8 Environmental monitoring measures during Plan implementation ................................................ 8 3 of 10 Statement of environmental particulars for the Poole and Wareham Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy Introduction This statement of particulars indicates how environmental and consultee considerations were taken into account during the preparation of the plan and how the Environment Agency selected the approach adopted in the final plan. The statement goes on to set out the monitoring procedures that have been set in place to monitor the significant environmental effects of the implementation of the plan/programme. The environment Integration of environmental considerations during the Environmental considerations were integrated throughout the development of development of this plan by following the Environment Agency’s SEA operational instruction. the plan This document ensures the potential significant effects of the plan on the environment are considered throughout its development. Influence of the environmental report The environmental report that was open to public consultation influenced the development of the plan by identifying environmental enhancements and setting out requirements for mitigation, where significant negative effects were identified. Mitigation and Enhancement Environmental Topic Agreed Responsibility for Mitigation/Enhancement implementation activity Population and Human Health Some isolated properties These properties will require Property owners. across the southern side of local resistance or resilience Poole Harbour and at measures to be implemented Studland will be affected by by their private owners. increased flooding and/or Some local raising of roads as Local Authority or erosion in the long term, as may also be required such as Highways Agency policies leading to a more at Arne village, which may ‘natural’ shoreline are become tidally cut-off in delivered. extreme events in the long- term. Changes in coastal processes Care will be taken at project Environment Agency in areas of NAI have the level to implement managed potential to affect fishing realignment schemes that activities and the distribution avoid compromising of commercial fish/shellfish in commercial fishing activity the harbour – these impacts (e.g. access to fishing (which may be positive and grounds) and shellfisheries in negative) remain uncertain the harbour. but would also occur in the We will closely monitor 4 of 10 absence of the Strategy. changes in geomorphology to improve our understanding of However, further such the implications of the changes may occur change. associated with proposed MR sites along the estuarine Before, during and after shoreline at Ridge and in delivery of MR we will monitor Lytchett Bay. Changes in water quality at commercial coastal processes here might (shell)fishery locations affect water quality locally and associated with MR sites and in the wider harbour, with the monitor fisheries potential for changes in productivity/quality adjacent fisheries and associated loss to MR sites. of commercial fishing revenue. Biodiversity Flora and Fauna Continuing to hold the line at Managed realignment will Environment Agency Sandbanks to Hamworthy mitigate the effects of coastal and at Wareham may defences elsewhere in Poole significantly adversely affect Harbour. This will create intertidal habitats for birds compensatory intertidal and other species in the mudflat, saltmarsh and Poole Harbour SPA and grazing marsh. The Strategy Ramsar site as a result of identifies indicative areas and habitat loss due to coastal defence alignments, with squeeze (i.e. hard flood further information on specific defences restricting the sites to be identified as natural development of individual sites are taken intertidal habitats as sea level forward. These MR sites will rises in the future). be taken forward as projects. Defence maintenance and improvements around the eastern side of Poole Harbour may also result in small additional encroachment into the Poole Harbour SPA and Ramsar site. Preferred compensatory We already undertake water Environment Agency plus habitat sites may be quality monitoring within other strategic delivery vulnerable to the formation of Poole Harbour. Additional partners. algal mats if they are in areas sites will be added as with low rates of flushing and required to provide if hyper-eutrophication in the information on water quality harbour is not reduced (in particular nutrients) associated with the selected compensatory habitat sites. This will provide us with an improved understanding of nutrient levels in these areas. If further nutrient reduction actions need to be delivered this will be through Water Framework Directive and Catchment Sensitive Farming 5 of 10 delivery projects. Historic Environment The gabion works proposed Detailed design at the project Environment Agency and/or at Hengistbury Head may level may be able to lessen or appropriate Risk encroach on the boundary of avoid potential impacts. Management Authority. the Scheduled Monument. Scheduled Monument Elsewhere construction work Consent will be required. may affect local intertidal archaeological remains. The managed realignment There may be some delivery project(s) will Environment Agency potentially adverse effects on encompass archaeological archaeological remains and assessment (including, if areas of historic landscape in necessary, field particular in locations investigations) to establish proposed for managed appropriate mitigation related realignment where historically to new defence alignments reclaimed land and shorelines and footprints, (palaeo)- will be lost as will near to archaeological recording, etc. shore archaeological remains. No single body or Some prehistoric burial No specific mitigation organisation is identified at mounds on Arne peninsula identified at this stage. If the moment for managing the will remain at risk of flooding deem that protection or other risks of natural erosion on and coastal erosion through mitigation is desirable against historic sites. A local solution the continuation of No Active natural shoreline evolution, may be appropriate in this Intervention policy. this might be developed instance. Further advice may locally. be available from Historic England. Landscape and Visual Amenity In those areas where the Potential adverse landscape Environment Agency and/or standard of flood protection and visual impacts including appropriate Risk will be maintained loss of vegetation and land Management Authority. (Hengistbury Head to cover will be avoided or offset Sandbanks, eastern Poole through the incorporation of Harbour, Hamworthy, Lytchett project level mitigation Bay, Wareham and Swanage) including: possible use of there is potential for effects suitable material finishes to on landscape character and hard defences; subtle visual amenity. earthworks designs to avoid Consequences could be harshly engineered profiles; greatest in areas within the sensitive alignment and Dorset AONB and along the footprint of the works to avoid Jurassic Coast World valued vegetation. Raised Heritage Site. defences will where required be sympathetically designed to maintain key views including the geological features of the Jurassic 6 of 10 coastline. Access and Recreation In such areas the footpaths or Dorset County Council and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Places
    Investing in Green places South East Dorset Green Infrastructure Strategy South East Dorset Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 July 2011 Final Version for Endorsement, July 2011 Incorporating Changes arising from the Dorset and South Wiltshire Planning and Transportation Liaison Committee (Paras 2.29 a-e) Front cover images ©Borough of Poole South East Dorset Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 2 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 2 INTRODUCTION 5 Background and Context 5 Role of the Strategy 6 Summary of Legal and Policy Context 7 Definition of Green Infrastructure 11 Local Context 11 3 VISION 14 A Vision for Green Infrastructure in South East Dorset 14 4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STRATEGY 16 Strategic Objectives 16 Green Infrastructure Outcomes and Benefits 16 5 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK 20 Corridors 20 Zones 20 Themed Initiatives 20 Coast and Harbours 22 Active Travel Network 22 River Valleys Corridor 22 Urban Greening Zone 22 Habitat Restoration Zones 23 Themes 26 Theme 1: Coast - a Year Round Destination 26 Theme 2: Active Travel Routes 27 Theme 3: Water and Flood Management 29 Theme 4: Greening the Urban Environment 30 Theme 5: Green Space Creation and Enhancement 31 Theme 6: Habitat Creation and Restoration 33 Theme 7: Celebrating Heritage 34 6 STANDARDS 35 Standards for Strategic Green Space in South East Dorset 35 Defining Strategic Green Space 36 Standards for Strategic Green Space 37 Developing Priorities for Strategic Green Space 41 Standards for Multi-Functional Green Infrastructure 41 7 IMPLEMENTATION AND DELIVERY 46 Promotion, Leadership and Governance 46 Planning Policy and Other Strategies 47 Green Infrastructure and Design Toolkit 48 Funding Opportunities 48 Key Strategic Projects 50 Developing an Action Plan 56 Monitoring and Review 60 8 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Strategic Green Space Sites Appendix 2: Key Strategic Project Details South East Dorset Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 3 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Diagram Investing in Green Places N.B.
    [Show full text]
  • 135. Dorset Heaths Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 135. Dorset Heaths Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 135. Dorset Heaths Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandbanks to Southbourne England Coast Path: Kimmeridge to Highcliffe - Natural England’S Proposals
    www.gov.uk/natural-england Chapter 5: Sandbanks to Southbourne England Coast Path: Kimmeridge to Highcliffe - Natural England’s Proposals Part 5.1: Introduction Start Point: Sandbanks Ferry (grid reference: SZ 0372 8706) End Point: Southbourne promenade (grid reference: SZ 1538 9102) Relevant Maps: 5a to 5h Understanding the proposals and accompanying maps: The Trail: 5.1.1 Follows existing walked routes throughout, including public rights of way and promenades. 5.1.2 Follows the coastline quite closely and maintains views of the sea except for a short section at Sandbanks where it passes behind some buildings (see map 5a). 5.1.3 Is aligned on the beach for two short sections at Sandbanks (see maps 5a and 5b), in order to maintain views of the open sea. 5.1.4 This part of the coast includes the following sites, designated for nature conservation or heritage preservation (See map C of the Overview). Poole Harbour Special Protection Area (SPA) Solent and Dorset Coast proposed Special Protection Area (pSPA) Poole Bay Cliffs Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) for its geological /wildlife interest We have assessed the potential impacts of access along the proposed route (and over the associated spreading room described below) on the features for which the affected land is designated and on any which are protected in their own right. 5.1.5 The levels and patterns of public access along this length of coast would be unlikely to change significantly as a result of our proposals and we have therefore concluded that our proposals would not be likely to have any significant impact on these features.
    [Show full text]
  • Kimmeridge Bay to Highcliffe Sensitive Features Report
    Access and Sensitive Features Appraisals: Kimmeridge Bay to Highcliffe Page | 1 Access and Sensitive Features Appraisals: Kimmeridge Bay to Highcliffe Programme Coastal Access Proposal title Kimmeridge Bay to Highcliffe Aim and location This appraisal presents Natural England’s assessment of the proposals to establish the England Coast Path, between Kimmeridge Bay and Highcliffe, as necessary under the relevant legislation including: Assessment of impacts on SSSIs and the requirement to fulfil Natural England’s duties under S28G of the 1981 Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) to take reasonable steps, consistent with the proper exercise of our functions, to further the conservation and enhancement of the SSSI; Assessment of impacts on European designated sites (SPA, SAC) under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (the “Habitats Regulations”); Assessment of impacts on Ramsar sites Assessment of impacts on Marine Conservation Zones under Section 125 and 126 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act (MCAA) (2009). Species protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and by the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010. These appraisal should be read in conjunction with Natural England’s Coastal Access Report – Kimmeridge Bay to Highcliffe, which sets out for approval by the Secretary of State our proposals for the England Coast Path and associated Coastal Margin on this stretch of coast. Report Status Final Date 15 March 2017 TRIM reference Access Case Officer David Trump Site Responsible Officer Matt Low, Andrew Nicholson, Adam Bates, Helen Powell and Simon Curson Access and Sensitive Features Appraisals: Kimmeridge Bay to Highcliffe Page | 2 Contents Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal: Kimmeridge Bay to Studland .
    [Show full text]
  • Annex Ii: Detailed Environmental Baseline
    ANNEX II: DETAILED ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE 1.1 The Water Environment The following section provides an overview of the water environment associated with the Poole and Christchurch Bays SMP2 which takes into consideration wave, tidal and coastal processes, water quality (both freshwater and marine) and key recourse activities. 1.1.3 Waves Most waves that reach the Dorset coast have been generated by winds blowing over the Atlantic Ocean. Their size depends upon the strength of the wind, its duration (the length of time the wind has been blowing at that speed), and the fetch (the distance of sea over which the wind blows) (DCDA, 2009). Waves from the southwest have a fetch in excess of 4000 km, whereas waves from the south or east-south-east have very restricted fetch (120 km and 240 km respectively). As a result, waves generated from the southwest are able to attain greater size than those from other, less-exposed directions (DCDA, 2009). Waves with heights over 8m have been recorded along the Dorset coast, but most waves are much smaller. The maximum wave height (H max) for a given period of time is very important for the design of coast protection and flood defence schemes, harbours, and oil and gas offshore platforms. On 14th October 1976, a wave recording buoy off Bournemouth recorded a wave with a height (H max) of 8.3m. The SMP for Poole and Christchurch (Halcrow Maritime, 1999) provides detailed information about wave heights and energies, which are important for assessing both the movements of sediment alongshore and the wave energy to which beaches and coastal structures may be exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Page Index of Policies I Index of Pictures Ii Index of Figures Ii Index of Tables Ii Index of Maps Iii
    Contents Page Index of Policies i Index of Pictures ii Index of Figures ii Index of Tables ii Index of Maps iii 1 Introduction 1 2 Characteristics of the Area 9 3 Issues, Problems and Challenges 13 4 Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives 27 5 A Spatial Strategy for Poole 35 6 The Detailed Strategy: 39 Core Policies for Issues and Places Realising Poole’s Economic Potential 39 Meeting Poole’ Housing Needs 52 Revitalising the Town Centre 63 Accessibility and the Prime Transport Corridors 75 Priority Areas in Need of Investment and Improvement 86 Locally Distinctive and Self-Reliant Places 93 Areas where Change will be Carefully Managed 102 Preparing Poole for Climate Change 106 7 Monitoring and Implementation 117 8 Key Diagram 145 9 Appendix 1: Schedule of saved policies 147 Index of Policies Realising Poole’s Economic Potential PCS 1 Principal Locations for Economic Investment 45 PCS 2 Existing Employment Areas 47 PCS 3 Poole Port 51 PCS 4 Isolated Employment Sites 52 Meeting Poole’s Housing Needs PCS 5 Broad Locations for Residential Development 55 PCS 6 Affordable Housing 57 PCS 7 Care Homes 60 PCS 8 Lifetime Homes 62 PCS 9 Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation 62 Revitalising the Town Centre PCS 10 Revitalising the Town Centre - General 64 PCS 11 The Regeneration Area 66 PCS 12 Town Centre North 71 PCS 13 Retail Growth outside the Town Centre 73 PCS 14 The Lower High Street 75 Accessibility and the Prime Transport Corridors PCS 15 Access and Movement 79 PCS 16 The East-West Bournemouth-Poole (A35) Corridor 81 PCS 17 The A3049 East-West
    [Show full text]
  • Licence Annex B: Provisions Relating to Licensed Actions on Or Around Special Areas of Conservation
    Licence Annex B: Provisions relating to licensed actions on or around Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), and/or Ramsar sites within the county of Dorset SSSI name European Designated Site Licence condition name (where applicable) Abbotsbury Blind No additional conditions imposed. Lane Abbotsbury All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Castle Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint. Arne Dorset Heathlands Avoid all intertidal, saltmarsh and beach habitats at Ramsar; Dorset all times. Heathlands SPA; Dorset Heaths (Purbeck & Operations conducted under this licence must Wareham) & Studland comply with existing legal obligations described in Dunes SAC; Dorset Heaths Note Y. No licensed operations 1st April to 31st SAC; Poole Harbour August, inclusive. Ramsar; Poole Harbour SPA During the period 1st September to 31st March inclusive: no licensed operations within 200 metres of all intertidal, saltmarsh and beach habitats, and all large waterbodies, including Little Sea; no licensed operations on fen, reedbed, or grazing marsh habitats. Do not disturb large flocks of waterbirds. No access to Stoborough and Creech Heaths SSSI 1st September to 30th April, inclusive. Before commencing licensed activities each season, operators must confirm with Natural England and the owner/occupier the location of any further communal roost locations supporting significant numbers of Hen Harrier or Merlin. Except on existing roads and tracks, there shall be no access within 500 metres of any such locations from 1st September to 30th April, inclusive. All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Space Strategy for Bournemouth 2007-11
    Green Space Strategy for Bournemouth 2007-11 (Final Draft – November 2006) Foreward By Councillor Bronwen Littlewood, Cabinet Member for Environment & Leisure To be added ii Contents 1. Vision………………………………………………………………………………………….1 2. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….2 3. What We Have Done………………………………………………………………….3 4. Survey Findings………………………………………………………………………….6 5. Audit Findings…………………………………………………………………………..8 6. About the Borough……………………………………………………………………10 7. Issues & Constraints………………………………………………………………….13 8. Action Plan……………………………………………………………………………….15 i. Parks & Gardens…………………………………………………………..15 ii. Play Areas…………………………………………………………………….17 iii. Outdoor Sports Facilities, Pitches & Courts……………….20 iv. Amenity Sites (informal grass areas)………………………….21 v. Allotments…………………………………………………………………..22 vi. School Sites………………………………………………………………….23 vii. Cemeteries & Churchyards………………………………………….23 viii. Seafront……………………………………………………………………….24 ix. All Typologies………………………………………………………………24 9. Countryside & Nature Conservation……………………….………………27 10. Global Warming & Sustainability…………………………………………….31 11. Disability………………………………………………………………………………….35 12. Marketing, Promotion & Community Involvement………………….36 13. Anti-social behaviour……………………………………………………………….38 14. Next Steps………………………………………………………………………………..39 Appendix 1 – Site Map…………………………………………………………………….40 Appendix 2 – Electoral Ward Map……………………..…………………………..42 Appendix 3 – Neighbourhood Map…………………………………………………..44 Appendix 4 – Nature Conservation Strategy Appendix 5 – Woodland & Urban Tree Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Natural and Built Environment Baseline
    Appendix D Natural and Built Environment Baseline Poole and Christchurch Bays SMP2 9T2052/R/301164/Exet Report V3 2010 Poole and Christchurch Bays SMP2 9T2052/R/301164/Exet Report V3 2010 POOLE & CHRISTCHURCH BAYS SMP2 Sub-cell 5f Appendix D Natural and Built Environment Baseline (Thematic Studies) Bournemouth Borough Council October 2010 Final Report Poole and Christchurch Bays SMP2 9T2052/R/301164/Exet Report V3 2010 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Poole and Christchurch Bays SMP2 9T2052/R/301164/Exet Report V3 2010 HASKONING UK LTD. COASTAL & RIVERS 26 Beatrice Road Bodmin Cornwall PL31 1RD United Kingdom +44 (0)0208 75947 Telephone Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title POOLE & CHRISTCHURCH BAYS SMP2 Sub-cell 5f Appendix D Natural and Built Environment Baseline (Thematic Studies) Document short title Theme Review Status Final Report Date October 2010 Project name Poole & Christchurch Bays SMP2 Project number 9T2052 Client Bournemouth Borough Council Reference Bodmin/303478 Drafted by D Miles / J Ridgewell Checked by T Eggiman / P Brunner Date/initials check …………………. …………………. Approved by H Hall Date/initials approval …………………. …………………. THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Poole and Christchurch Bays SMP2 9T2052/R/301164/Exet Report V3 2010 Contents: 1 Introduction...........................................................................................i 2 Current and Future Land Use ............................................................ 2 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Shoreline Management Plan Population Dynamics 13 2.3 Future planning targets 13 3 Natural Environment ........................................................................ 16 3.1 Landscape and natural character assessment overview 16 3.2 Designated area assessment 25 3.3 Assessment of the Natural Environment 28 3.4 Conservation targets and plans 37 4 Historic Environment.......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Full Name Organisation Details Comment ID Question 1 - the Draft SPD Provides an Approach to Planning for the Future of the Seafront
    Full Name Organisation Details Comment ID Question 1 - The draft SPD provides an approach to planning for the future of the seafront. Please let Key Points us know your views on this approach. Mrs J Prett 62 I have just discovered the council's seafront plan by chance & am surprised it has not been made more Not well publicised. readily available to the people of Poole nor has it made people aware of what is planned? How many more Appreciate the need to people do not know about this? Whilst I realise we have to 'move with the times' I think that much of our move with the times but beach and coastal areas are beautifully natural and by erecting ultra modern buildings in various places not all the beaches should mentioned in the draft - will detract from the character of the residential and quiet beach areas. Do they all be made busy and noisy have to be made busy and noisy with loads of activity areas? with activity areas. Professor John Committee Member 293 2013 July Discussion Paper from The Sandbanks Association for the Borough of Poole: following receipt of Essential to retain blue Newton Sandbanks the SPS document, June 2013 version. 'Maintain high quality of a blue flag family beach: Often one hears flag status. Support SPS Association from families of their experiences of Sandbanks One Grandfather recounted the following - ˜I was brought general aims, but not over- here to the beach as a child and my wife and I brought our children. Then, they in turn brought their children commercialisation of for the classic and unforgettable family beach holiday.' Long may it continue to provide that wonderful Sandbanks Beach which experience'' It is essential that we maintain the blue flag status of Sandbanks Beach and other associated is contrary to the beaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Licence Annex B
    LICENCE ANNEX B: Summary of all restrictions relating to licensed actions on Sites of Special Scientific Interest, Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas and RAMSAR Sites within the county of Dorset Protected Sites that are within the assessment are not necessarily part of any active operations. Active operations can and will only occur on protected sites where landowner permission has been granted. SSSI Site Name European Site Licence Conditions Name (if applicable Abbotsbury Blind No additional conditions imposed Lane Abbotsbury Castle Restrict vehicles to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint. Aunt Mary's West Dorset Alder Exclude SSSI or restrict vehicles to existing vehicular Bottom Woods SAC tracks & limit location of traps to within the sett footprint Axmouth to Lyme Sidmouth to West Exclude SSSI or restrict access to footpaths. Exclude Regis Under Cliffs Bay SAC the littoral sediment and supralittoral sediment and shingle zones. Limit location of traps to within sett footprint. Restrict vehicles to existing tracks. Purple Gromwell may be present on pathways... Babylon Hill No additional conditions imposed Batcombe Down Restrict vehicles to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint or areas of scrub within Units 1, 3 and 4 Bere Stream Exclude SSSI or restrict vehicles to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint. Limit location of traps to existing footprint or areas of scrub within Units 1 and 3. Black Hill Down Cerne & Sydling Restrict vehicles to existing tracks. Limit location of Downs SAC traps to existing footprint or areas of scrub. Exclude any Marsh Fritillary butterfly colony locations from vehicle movement or digging in of traps (likely to be on West or South facing slopes).
    [Show full text]
  • Poole and Wareham Star V6.3A Final
    Strategy Appraisal Report Authority scheme IMSW001625 reference Promoting Environment Agency authority Strategy Poole Bay, Poole Harbour and Wareham Flood and Coastal name Erosion Risk Management Strategy 1) Erosion causing loss of 60m section of seawall at Bournemouth, 1989 2) Flooding at Wareham Quay, December 2012 3) Flooding near Sandbanks, Poole, March 2008 4) Erosion near Sandbanks, January 2013 Date January 2014 Version Final v6.3a StAR for Poole Harbour, Poole Bay and Wareham Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy Ver Status Signed off by: Date Date sion signed issued 1.0 1st Draft for ncpms/NEAS Adam Schofield 12/04/13 12/04/13 comment 2.0 2nd Draft for ncpms/NEAS/Area Adam Schofield 17/05/13 17/05/13 comments 3.0 3rd Draft for Steering Group Adam Schofield 24/05/13 24/05/13 4.0 4th Draft for Internal Review Adam Schofield 14/06/13 14/06/13 5.0 Final Draft before LPRG Adam Schofield 01/07/13 01/07/13 submission 6.0 Final submission for LPRG Adam Schofield 04/07/13 04/07/13 6.1 Final submission for LPRG Adam Schofield 16/07/13 16/07/13 6.2 Revised final submission inc Adam Schofield 13/09/13 16/09/13 LPRG comments 6.3 Revised final submission inc Adam Schofield 11/12/13 11/12/13 additional LPRG comments 6.3a Final Russell Corney 28/01/14 28/01/14 Template version – April 2011 Title Poole Bay, Poole Harbour and Wareham Flood and Coastal Risk Management Strategy No. IMSW001625 Status: Version 6.3a Issue Date: Jan 2014 Page i CONTENTS For technical approval of the business case .................................................................iv Non-financial scheme of delegation ..............................................................................iv Approval history sheet .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]