Licence Annex B
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
History of the Aldershot Branch, Rsa
HISTORY OF THE ALDERSHOT BRANCH, RSA Edition 2, June 2020 The author acknowledges with grateful thanks the considerable help received in compiling the military history content of this update. Paul Vickers, Chairman, Friends of the Aldershot Military Museum, generously provided much detailed information on Aldershot Garrison aspects. The story of the formation of C Troop was drawn from the research work of branch member, David Mullineaux, written up in the Royal Signals Institution Journal of Spring 2010. Branch Committee Member, Neville Lyons not only provided the lists of events and talks but also proof read the whole document and made valued suggestions on presentation. Historical Background There has been a strong link between Aldershot and the evolution of modern Army signalling ever since the establishment of the first Royal Engineers Telegraph Troop there in 1871. As the technology developed, so did the number of units both in Aldershot and worldwide with the result that at the end of the Great War there were 70,000 men serving in the Royal Engineers Signal Service. This led in 1920 to the formation of the Royal Corps of Signals which has maintained a continuous link with the Town and Garrison of Aldershot to this day. The full story of this evolutionary process is set out in a further new paper entitled “Aldershot: the Cradle of Army Signalling.” The technical and organisational details given there are separate from the history of the Association branch but there is a connection between the two stories which was particularly close in the early years of Royal Signals because of the units and individuals involved. -
The Frome 8, Piddle Catchmentmanagement Plan 88 Consultation Report
N 6 L A “ S o u t h THE FROME 8, PIDDLE CATCHMENTMANAGEMENT PLAN 88 CONSULTATION REPORT rsfe ENVIRONMENT AGENCY NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House. Goldhay Way. Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR NRA National Rivers Authority South Western Region M arch 1995 NRA Copyright Waiver This report is intended to be used widely and may be quoted, copied or reproduced in any way, provided that the extracts are not quoted out of context and that due acknowledgement is given to the National Rivers Authority. Published March 1995 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Hill IIII llll 038007 FROME & PIDDLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT YOUR VIEWS The Frome & Piddle is the second Catchment Management Plan (CMP) produced by the South Wessex Area of the National Rivers Authority (NRA). CMPs will be produced for all catchments in England and Wales by 1998. Public consultation is an important part of preparing the CMP, and allows people who live in or use the catchment to have a say in the development of NRA plans and work programmes. This Consultation Report is our initial view of the issues facing the catchment. We would welcome your ideas on the future management of this catchment: • Hdve we identified all the issues ? • Have we identified all the options for solutions ? • Have you any comments on the issues and options listed ? • Do you have any other information or ideas which you would like to bring to our attention? This document includes relevant information about the catchment and lists the issues we have identified and which need to be addressed. -
Phase 1 Report, July 1999 Monitoring Heathland Fires in Dorset
MONITORING HEATHLAND FIRES IN DORSET: PHASE 1 Report to: Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions: Wildlife and Countryside Directorate July 1999 Dr. J.S. Kirby1 & D.A.S Tantram2 1Just Ecology 2Terra Anvil Cottage, School Lane, Scaldwell, Northampton. NN6 9LD email: [email protected] web: http://www.terra.dial.pipex.com Tel/Fax: +44 (0) 1604 882 673 Monitoring Heathland Fires in Dorset Metadata tag Data source title Monitoring Heathland Fires in Dorset: Phase 1 Description Research Project report Author(s) Kirby, J.S & Tantram, D.A.S Date of publication July 1999 Commissioning organisation Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions WACD Name Richard Chapman Address Room 9/22, Tollgate House, Houlton Street, Bristol, BS2 9DJ Phone 0117 987 8570 Fax 0117 987 8119 Email [email protected] URL http://www.detr.gov.uk Implementing organisation Terra Environmental Consultancy Contact Dominic Tantram Address Anvil Cottage, School Lane, Scaldwell, Northampton, NN6 9LD Phone 01604 882 673 Fax 01604 882 673 Email [email protected] URL http://www.terra.dial.pipex.com Purpose/objectives To establish a baseline data set and to analyse these data to help target future actions Status Final report Copyright No Yes Terra standard contract conditions/DETR Research Contract conditions. Some heathland GIS data joint DETR/ITE copyright. Some maps based on Ordnance Survey Meridian digital data. With the sanction of the controller of HM Stationery Office 1999. OS Licence No. GD 272671. Crown Copyright. Constraints on use Refer to commissioning agent Data format Report Are data available digitally: No Yes Platform on which held PC Digital file formats available Report in Adobe Acrobat PDF, Project GIS in MapInfo Professional 5.5 Indicative file size 2.3 MB Supply media 3.5" Disk CD ROM DETR WACD - 2 - Phase 1 report, July 1999 Monitoring Heathland Fires in Dorset EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lowland heathland is a rare and threatened habitat and one for which we have international responsibility. -
Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report
Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report Appendix A: Consultee responses to the scoping report and amendments made as a consequence November 30, 2017 Version 1 Appendix A Statement of Response Southern Water issued its Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Scoping Report for its Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 for public consultation from 28th April 2017 to 2nd June 2017. Comments on the SEA Scoping Report were received from the following organisations: Natural England Environment Agency Historic England Howard Taylor, Upstream Dry Fly Sussex Wildlife Trust The Test & Itchen Association Ltd Wessex Chalk Stream Rivers Trust Forestry Commission England Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Longdown Management Limited Amanda Barker-Mill C. H. Layman These comments are set out in Table 1 together with Southern Water’s response as to how it intends to take account of them in developing the SEA of the Draft Water Resources Management Plan. Table 1 Draft Water Resources Management Plan: SEA Scoping Report – responses to comments received How comments have been addressed in the Ref Consultee Comment Draft Water Resources Management Plan Environmental Report Plans programmes or policies I recommend you add the following to your list of plans programmes or policies: National. - Defra strategy for the environment creating a great place for These policies, plans and programmes have Natural living. been included in the SEA Environmental Report 1 England - The national conservation strategy conservation-21 and considered in the assessment of potential effects of the WRMP. - The 5 point plan to salmon conservation in the UK National Nature Reserve Management Plans (though you may not be able to, or need to, list all of these, please just reference them as a source of information for assessment of any relevant options). -
Debbie Tulett Portland Resident
Ref: Planning application: WP/20/00692/DCC OBJECTION TO THE POWERFUEL PORTLAND LTD PLANNING APPLICATION THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE DORSET WASTE PLAN 2019 (Adopted December 2019) POLICY 18 Biodiversity and geological interest Natura 2000 Sites Proposals for waste management facilities must not adversely affect the integrity of European or Ramsar or other internationally designated sites, either alone or in combination with other plans and projects. Sites of national and local importance: Development which adversely affects a Site of Special Scientific Interest will not normally be permitted, except where the benefits of the development at the site clearly outweigh the impacts on the features of the site. Policies 1-6 of the DWP establish that the benefits of the development of the site clearly do not outweigh the impacts of the features of the site and that there is no ‘need’ for a waste incinerator at this location other than for personal financial gain. This proposed site not only abuts a SSSI and is within metres of a SAC, but within 10km of the site there are numerous conservation designations. Therefore this proposal is in breach of the Dorset Waste Plan 2019 Policy 18 OVERVIEW: The Isle of Portland is a magnificent place for birdwatching, known as one of the best in Britain and is renowned for its migratory birds and passing seabirds. Habitats include cliffs, old quarries, farmland, dense scrub, rough pasture, clumps of trees and residential gardens. Portland is one of the UK’s best-known birdwatching areas. The abundance of Portland’s wildlife is remarkable, as the unique beauty of Portland has various habitats supporting a diverse range of animals, birds and plants. -
Key Poole Town Centre
n ll rl on e et F t e Rd Sch Rd Dr y H d U Whitehouse Rd e tt R llswat n ille W C W er Rd Po c d 8 h a a m R 4 m M y a a y p 3 R g s y e r m 's W e A a d l y d B B Cl Fitzpain e i k s W W a n Canford C ig 3 a Carters Cottages l ht r Hurn A O L s W r n 0 l o Lambs' 31 A31 Park n k k a Honey 7 B c w N r 3073 d 3 Glissons o Rd e s Farm C n Green d C n w h Lower Russell's L kley L C Barrack Rd s d Park Cottages d Belle Vu r y L Oa e a d s am a R l Copse bs Hampreston s p n y an P Hadria d g c a reen To l Poor e l L n i d d H C Dirty Lane e v F Holmwood n e l a R Wk C Cl n Wimborne a l l Common ammel n L t Oakley o m Coppice t a r n H C y l Higher Russell's L C M al L Park n W Brog S l n r F C i e House Ln o a u k Copse y A349 Ch d H u r r b e D Merley l Harrie C m is s R S r r Dr Merley opw n tc Belle Vue d West e y i u t v Mill St A31 Park e h l t hu D e e First Sch C j r a A31 M l o c Plantation r A Rhubane r Longham h F Parley k e y Floral d Rd b Parley Bsns h Cottage a e s R n O a r c L v Wood Pk r rm i n Rd d den Cl u i k A B o 3 l Pond Chichester W 07 B B Oakley 3 y S ry opw ith o B Merley l Cres C e Coppice Rec l Oakland i Lin l l w d a bu r S w Brie W n Cottage H a e rley Grd g d t n e n i o y B o f n R ds Av o r r i e u e M a g d r er d l le b u k d Rec y B r L H a a R R The n z a Vw o D d ak a e Grd n M Canford C h Shrubbery O w Rd in Sports M e East k d L Ashington Ln er r Magna yd W Fields y o k n le C li k B er l f n 3 End L M c l n Longham Lakes 0 H S W R h 7 Dudsbury C n s a 4 ark Rd n Cl u e P d e Garden Reservoir o y G Layard -
Site Selection Background Paper – October 2013
Site Selection Background Paper – October 2013 SITE SELECTION 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Informing the Plan ........................................................................................................................... 1 General information on the area ......................................................................................................... 1 Key settlements ................................................................................................................................... 2 How the area functions ....................................................................................................................... 4 Information on land availability, including previously developed land ............................................... 4 Information on need ............................................................................................................................ 5 3 Developing the plan ........................................................................................................................ 6 Growth options at the strategically significant towns ......................................................................... 6 Site sieving ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Sustainability testing ........................................................................................................................... -
Western Weald Farmland And
1C: RINGWOOD PLANTATIONS AND HEATH Plumley wood – typical landcover of the character area - large predominantly single age stand conifer plantations interspersed with small areas of open heath and acid grassland. Typical deciduous woodland belts Moors Valley Country Park set in Fields often with low hedges – in the between road and conifer plantation –commercial forestry. north and east there are signs of post Ringwood Rd. medieval enclosure. Small stream valleys cross the area egMineral extraction at Somerley – Part restoration to heathland after Hamer Brook © Colin Perrin,enclosed by plantation woodland. extraction Geograph Hampshire County 1 Status: FINAL DRAFT March 2010 Integrated Character Assessment Ringwood Plantations and Heath . Hampshire County 2 Status: FINAL DRAFT March 2010 Integrated Character Assessment Ringwood Plantations and Heath . 1.0 Location and Boundaries 1.1 This character area is located in the southwest of Hampshire and crosses over the county boundary into Dorset. It comprises a sandy/gravel undulating plateau which flanks the western side of the River Avon valley. 1.2 Component County Landscape Types Woodland and Plantation on Heath, Lowland Mosaic Heath Associated, Lowland Mosaic Small Scale. 1.3 Composition of Borough/District LCAs: New Forest Ringwood Forest The boundary of this character area strongly correlates with that identified in the District character assessment. 1.4 Associations with NCAs and Natural Areas: NCA 135: Dorset Heaths NA 81: Dorset Heaths 2.0 Key Characteristics Wooded undulating plateau to the west of on the Avon Valley. Free draining soils and plateau gravels giving rise to acid soils and associated vegetation. Extensive SINC designation, due to the diversity of habitat, species and ecological structure in the area. -
English Nature Research Report 95
6 INDICATOR SPECIES The idea that a group of species can be used as indicators to assess and monitor environmental quality and change is a simple and attractive one and has been successful in a number of cases. The range of species is considerable and they can be used in a variety of ways. The first group are those which are used to describe and classify communities. A good example of this is phytosociolagy, the National Vegetation Classification for instance. Here an assemblage of species is used to distinguish one community from another. Further sub-divisions of the main community and the relationships between vegetation types can be defined by considering the presence and absence of other (indicator) species. A second group of species is used to assess quality and to monitor environmental change. Perhaps the best example of this is provided by freshwater communities which are used to assess river water quality. Here there have been three approaches; first. a simple biotic index in which the differential responses of species to a pollutant is used to asses quality. Secondly, diversity indices (species richness and equitability) provides a more refined approach. Finally, the most detailed approach relates community structure to environmental variables (RIVPACS) to provide target communities against which physical and chemical stresses can be assessed. The group of indicator species which are used to identify ancient woodland or to date hedgerows is similar to a biotic index. In these cases persistence and susceptibility to disturbance are the variables which determine the presence or absence of these species. Finally there are species which have a high conservation value. -
Kim Sankey BA(Hons) Diparch Aadipcons RIBA Tel: 07742190490 | 01297 561045 Email: [email protected] Website
Kim Sankey BA(Hons) DipArch AADipCons RIBA Tel: 07742190490 | 01297 561045 Email: [email protected] Website: www.angel-architecture.co.uk Kim Sankey is a chartered Architect with more than 30 years’ experience spent wholly in the heritage sector. After graduating from Canterbury College of Art with a degree and diploma in Architecture and RIBA Part III, she achieved a further diploma in Building Conservation at the Architectural Association in London. Kim has worked both in the UK and overseas, including the conservation and reinstatement of fire damaged joinery at Uppark for the National Trust and repair and conservation of several war damaged buildings in Beirut. Latterly she was head of conservation for West Dorset District and Weymouth & Portland Borough Councils before starting her own chartered practice in 2014 covering the area of Dorset, Devon and Somerset. Kim inside Bridport Literary and Scientific Angel Architecture specialises in five areas – commercial clients, private clients, community Institute, for Bridport Area Development Trust projects, place making and heritage assessments. Kim has wide-ranging expertise including hands-on repair of historic buildings including mosaics, frescos, lime mortar and render. She also appears as expert witness in public inquiries in design matters and has been contract administrator for several complex historic building projects. She has been the author of many conservation area appraisals and has contributed heritage input to many neighbourhood plans. As well as running a busy practice Kim mentors undergraduates at the University of West of England and has applied to be on the conservation judging panel for the South West RIBA Regional Awards 2020. -
2. Mineral Sites Plan
BOURNEMOUTH, CHRISTCHURCH, POOLE AND DORSET COUNCILS MINERAL SITES PLAN PRE-SUBMISSION DRAFT SCHEDULE OF MAIN MODIFICATIONS This schedu le includes ‘Main Modifications’ which relate to the soundness of the Plan. Main modification s are writt en in red and underlined and have the prefix ‘MM’. Text proposed for addition is shown like this. Text proposed for removal is shown like this. Text in blue is informative, but will not be includ ed in the final version of the Mineral Sites Plan. 1 CHAPTER 2 - CONTEXT AND STRUCTURE New Modification Para/Policy Change Reference Number Insert new section as follows: Policies Map Chapter 2 – The Polices Map shows the sites allocated through the Mineral Sites add new Plan. In order to help safeguard biodiversity, geodiversity, MM 1 section at landscape and airport safety the Policies Map also shows relevant the end of designations. Chapter. NB: Consequential change to the Submission Policies Map to show the Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, World Heritage Site, SPAs, SACs and RAMSAR sites. CHAPTER 3 - EXISTING AND PROPOSED MINERAL SITES 3.1 - Sand and Gravel (Page 18 of the Pre-Submission Draft Mineral Sites Plan) Para/Policy New Page number Modification Change Reference (Pre- Number Submission Draft MSP) Amend text in green box as follows: Sand and Gravel Supply During the Plan Period Permitted reserves at the end of 2016 2017 were 13.6 12.6 million tonnes , providing a landbank of approximately 8.5 years . However , by the end of 2018 June 2019 , when the Plan is expected to be adopted, this figure will have changed as sales continue and reserves fall. -
Summary Note of Sutton Poyntz Society Committee Minutes and Newsletters
Summary note of Sutton Poyntz Society Committee Minutes and Newsletters 19/2/1968 – Planning meeting To plan Inaugural Meeting of Society Attended by Mrs Macdonald, Mr Samphier, Mrs Sutton, Mr Preswell, Mrs Shires, Mr & Mrs Litschi Committee – 6 plus officers, with 3 places allocated for “natives of the village” Discussion of sub-committees and working parties Discussion of structure of Inaugural Meeting 5/3/1968 – Inaugural Meeting – Mission Hall Chaired by L Samphier 50-60 residents – 17 apologies Guest speakers, Col Wordsworth of CPRE and Mr Ricketts of Civic Society Society – Objectives to “preserve the natural beauty of the area and protect it from unnecessary development” Unanimous vote to form Society Name: Sutton Poyntz Society preferred to Sutton Poyntz Preservation Society Offer by Mr Townsend of room at Springhead Hotel for meetings Committee – L Samphier (Chairman), Mrs J Litschi (Secretary), E Saunders (Treasurer), G Shires (Public Relations Officer), Mrs Mary Macdonald, Mr Hunt, Mrs Shires, Mr Henshaw, Mr Fullford, Mr Stillwell, Mr Litschi, Mr Branton, Mr Reed The pond – Agreed to request Borough Council to remove stone island, and use stones to strengthen perimeter. Also to request Borough to protect pond from rubbish, and agreed to reinstate ducks. Overhead cables – Concern about pylons in countryside Planning – Control of materials to be used in new buildings Litter – Control of rubbish Traffic – Siting of Sutton Poyntz road-sign Subscription – 10/- per household 11/3/1968 – Committee meeting – Springhead Hotel Newsletter – to be edited by Mr Samphier Press Officer – Mrs Shires appointed The pond – Further work done on island by Borough. Borough intention now to lower island and plant with water plants as cover for fish.