English Nature Research Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conceptualising Groundwater Flow Systems at a National (British Mainland) Scale
Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale Brighid Ó Dochartaigh and BGS Hydro-JULES team 11 September 2019 Seeking answers to 2 questions: How can an integrated & holistic approach to modelling terrestrial hydrology – including groundwater – improve: 1. Simulation of major flooding events, such as 2013-14 floods? 2. Assessment of water resources under drought conditions? Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 2 British mainland (WP4.1) 3D Parameterising Deep geological Saturated GW domain – Unsaturated framework Zone code technique Zone code model Conceptual FY18/19 models of groundwater (GW) flow Parameterising Model Sub-surface GW domain – instance code application FY19/20 Results Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 3 Britain’s diverse geology and hydrogeology Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 4 3D Geological Framework Model +1.5 km to -15 km 1:625,000 scale mapping Newell 2019 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 5 Model includes 3D information from: borehole geology & geophysics; pre-existing cross sections; geological history & structure; seismic data Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 6 Geology: a physical framework for groundwater flow Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 7 Key groundwater conceptual model parameters Geology Geography Surface water Groundwater Aquifer Chemistry Flow Aquifer Topographic relief Recharge quantity, Groundwater flow Aquifer properties: e.g. -
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan Scoping Report Puddletown Area Parish Council October 2018 Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Scoping Report Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan October 2018 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Cheryl Beattie Alastair Peattie Nick Chisholm-Batten Environmental Planner Associate Associate Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position V4 5th Oct 2018 Consultation version Nick Chisholm-Batten Associate Prepared for: Puddletown Area Parish Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited 3rd Floor, Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom T: +44 117 901 7000 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. Prepared for: Puddletown Area Parish Council AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Scoping Report Puddletown Neighbourhood Plan October 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... -
Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report
Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 Annex 14: SEA Main Report Appendix A: Consultee responses to the scoping report and amendments made as a consequence November 30, 2017 Version 1 Appendix A Statement of Response Southern Water issued its Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Scoping Report for its Draft Water Resources Management Plan 2019 for public consultation from 28th April 2017 to 2nd June 2017. Comments on the SEA Scoping Report were received from the following organisations: Natural England Environment Agency Historic England Howard Taylor, Upstream Dry Fly Sussex Wildlife Trust The Test & Itchen Association Ltd Wessex Chalk Stream Rivers Trust Forestry Commission England Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Longdown Management Limited Amanda Barker-Mill C. H. Layman These comments are set out in Table 1 together with Southern Water’s response as to how it intends to take account of them in developing the SEA of the Draft Water Resources Management Plan. Table 1 Draft Water Resources Management Plan: SEA Scoping Report – responses to comments received How comments have been addressed in the Ref Consultee Comment Draft Water Resources Management Plan Environmental Report Plans programmes or policies I recommend you add the following to your list of plans programmes or policies: National. - Defra strategy for the environment creating a great place for These policies, plans and programmes have Natural living. been included in the SEA Environmental Report 1 England - The national conservation strategy conservation-21 and considered in the assessment of potential effects of the WRMP. - The 5 point plan to salmon conservation in the UK National Nature Reserve Management Plans (though you may not be able to, or need to, list all of these, please just reference them as a source of information for assessment of any relevant options). -
Debbie Tulett Portland Resident
Ref: Planning application: WP/20/00692/DCC OBJECTION TO THE POWERFUEL PORTLAND LTD PLANNING APPLICATION THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE DORSET WASTE PLAN 2019 (Adopted December 2019) POLICY 18 Biodiversity and geological interest Natura 2000 Sites Proposals for waste management facilities must not adversely affect the integrity of European or Ramsar or other internationally designated sites, either alone or in combination with other plans and projects. Sites of national and local importance: Development which adversely affects a Site of Special Scientific Interest will not normally be permitted, except where the benefits of the development at the site clearly outweigh the impacts on the features of the site. Policies 1-6 of the DWP establish that the benefits of the development of the site clearly do not outweigh the impacts of the features of the site and that there is no ‘need’ for a waste incinerator at this location other than for personal financial gain. This proposed site not only abuts a SSSI and is within metres of a SAC, but within 10km of the site there are numerous conservation designations. Therefore this proposal is in breach of the Dorset Waste Plan 2019 Policy 18 OVERVIEW: The Isle of Portland is a magnificent place for birdwatching, known as one of the best in Britain and is renowned for its migratory birds and passing seabirds. Habitats include cliffs, old quarries, farmland, dense scrub, rough pasture, clumps of trees and residential gardens. Portland is one of the UK’s best-known birdwatching areas. The abundance of Portland’s wildlife is remarkable, as the unique beauty of Portland has various habitats supporting a diverse range of animals, birds and plants. -
Site Selection Background Paper – October 2013
Site Selection Background Paper – October 2013 SITE SELECTION 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Informing the Plan ........................................................................................................................... 1 General information on the area ......................................................................................................... 1 Key settlements ................................................................................................................................... 2 How the area functions ....................................................................................................................... 4 Information on land availability, including previously developed land ............................................... 4 Information on need ............................................................................................................................ 5 3 Developing the plan ........................................................................................................................ 6 Growth options at the strategically significant towns ......................................................................... 6 Site sieving ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Sustainability testing ........................................................................................................................... -
A CRITICAL EVALUATION of the LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD of the CHALK UPLANDS of NORTHWEST EUROPE Lesley
A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD OF THE CHALK UPLANDS OF NORTHWEST EUROPE The Chilterns, Pegsdon, Bedfordshire (photograph L. Blundell) Lesley Blundell UCL Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD September 2019 2 I, Lesley Blundell, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: 3 4 Abstract Our understanding of early human behaviour has always been and continues to be predicated on an archaeological record unevenly distributed in space and time. More than 80% of British Lower-Middle Palaeolithic findspots were discovered during the late 19th/early 20th centuries, the majority from lowland fluvial contexts. Within the British planning process and some academic research, the resultant findspot distributions are taken at face value, with insufficient consideration of possible bias resulting from variables operating on their creation. This leads to areas of landscape outside the river valleys being considered to have only limited archaeological potential. This thesis was conceived as an attempt to analyse the findspot data of the Lower-Middle Palaeolithic record of the Chalk uplands of southeast Britain and northern France within a framework complex enough to allow bias in the formation of findspot distribution patterns and artefact preservation/discovery opportunities to be identified and scrutinised more closely. Taking a dynamic, landscape = record approach, this research explores the potential influence of geomorphology, 19th/early 20th century industrialisation and antiquarian collecting on the creation of the Lower- Middle Palaeolithic record through the opportunities created for artefact preservation and release. -
N253: Geoscience for the Oil Industry: the Jurassic
Competence Level: N253: Geoscience for the Oil 3 Days Awareness Industry: The Jurassic Coast Petroleum System (Dorset, UK) Field Course Instructor(s): TBA Classroom Elements Low Physical Demand 3D Outcrop Imagery Summary The course is a predominantly field-based introduction to the oil and gas industry using the world famous Jurassic Coast Petroleum System in Southern England for illustration. It is intended as an introduction to petroleum geoscience and the basics of petroleum exploration and exploitation for individuals who have limited technical knowledge of these subjects. Learning Outcomes Participants will learn to: 1. Describe the fundamental principles of geology including geological time, plate tectonics, stratigraphy, palaeontology and rock composition. 2. Review the process of sedimentary basin formation and filling from erosion to deposition. 3. Discuss petroleum systems analysis including the concepts of source, migration, reservoir, trap and sealing. 4. Recognise different types of reservoir rocks and their properties, including porosity and permeability. Duration and Training Method A three day field class with an 90:10 split of field to classroom based activities. The teaching method is a combination of field work, practical demonstrations, exercises and classroom lectures based upon the geology of the Jurassic Coast, Dorset. This course will also make use of Digital Outcrop Imagery (DOI). The fieldwork component will focus on the petroleum system of the Wytch Farm oilfield. Physical Demand The physical demands for this class are LOW according to the Nautilus Training Alliance field course grading system. The sections are almost entirely coastal foreshore and cliff sections. Walking distances are short, up to 2 km (1.5 miles), along beaches and cliff top paths, and ascents minimal. -
Poole and Wareham Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy
Poole and Wareham Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy Statement of Environmental Particulars Final March 2015 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2014 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 10 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 The Environment -
Dinosaurs British Isles
DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39 -
Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites
World Heritage 41 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 27 June / 27 juin 2017 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Forty-first session / Quarante-et-unième session Krakow, Poland / Cracovie, Pologne 2-12 July 2017 / 2-12 juillet 2017 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (373bis) Stonehenge, Avebury et sites associés (Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord) (373bis) 31 January – 3 February 2017 Report on the joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated sites 31 January – 3 February 2017 Table of contents Executive Summary 1. Introductory Statements 1.1 Acknowledgments 1.2. Aims and mandate of the February 2017 Mission 2. Context and background 2.1 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) 2.2 Summary 1st Mission recommendations (October 2015 – report April 2016). 2.3 Reactions by the civil society 2.4 Governance and consensus building among heritage bodies 3. Responses by the SP to the recommendations of the first Mission - April 2016 3.1 Willingness to respond 3.2 Issues of archaeological organisation and quality control 3.3 Issue of visitor numbers and behaviour 4. -
Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date. -
Green Places
Investing in Green places South East Dorset Green Infrastructure Strategy South East Dorset Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 July 2011 Final Version for Endorsement, July 2011 Incorporating Changes arising from the Dorset and South Wiltshire Planning and Transportation Liaison Committee (Paras 2.29 a-e) Front cover images ©Borough of Poole South East Dorset Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 2 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 2 INTRODUCTION 5 Background and Context 5 Role of the Strategy 6 Summary of Legal and Policy Context 7 Definition of Green Infrastructure 11 Local Context 11 3 VISION 14 A Vision for Green Infrastructure in South East Dorset 14 4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STRATEGY 16 Strategic Objectives 16 Green Infrastructure Outcomes and Benefits 16 5 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK 20 Corridors 20 Zones 20 Themed Initiatives 20 Coast and Harbours 22 Active Travel Network 22 River Valleys Corridor 22 Urban Greening Zone 22 Habitat Restoration Zones 23 Themes 26 Theme 1: Coast - a Year Round Destination 26 Theme 2: Active Travel Routes 27 Theme 3: Water and Flood Management 29 Theme 4: Greening the Urban Environment 30 Theme 5: Green Space Creation and Enhancement 31 Theme 6: Habitat Creation and Restoration 33 Theme 7: Celebrating Heritage 34 6 STANDARDS 35 Standards for Strategic Green Space in South East Dorset 35 Defining Strategic Green Space 36 Standards for Strategic Green Space 37 Developing Priorities for Strategic Green Space 41 Standards for Multi-Functional Green Infrastructure 41 7 IMPLEMENTATION AND DELIVERY 46 Promotion, Leadership and Governance 46 Planning Policy and Other Strategies 47 Green Infrastructure and Design Toolkit 48 Funding Opportunities 48 Key Strategic Projects 50 Developing an Action Plan 56 Monitoring and Review 60 8 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Strategic Green Space Sites Appendix 2: Key Strategic Project Details South East Dorset Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 3 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Diagram Investing in Green Places N.B.