DOCSLIB.ORG

D Church Stretton Bugs Fowler.Xlsx 21 July 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D Church Stretton Bugs Fowler.Xlsx 21 July 2016 D Church Stretton Bugs Fowler.xlsx 21 July 2016 Invertebrates recorded on 21st July 2016 by Keith Fowler in Stretton Wetlands Family Taxon Common name Habitat Host Status Hemiptera Acanthosomatidae Acanthosoma haemorrhoidale Hawthorn shieldbug Grassland - wet Common Anthocoridae Anthocoris confusus A flower bug Grassland - wet Maple Common Anthocoridae Anthocoris nemoralis A flower bug Grassland - wet Maple Common Anthocoridae Anthocoris nemorum Common flower bug Grassland - wet Common Aphrophoridae Aphrophora alni Alder spittlebug Grassland - wet Common Aphrophoridae Aphrophora major A froghopper Grassland - wet Nationally notable B Aphrophoridae Neophilaenus lineatus A froghopper Grassland - wet Water mint Common Aphrophoridae Philaenus spumarius Common froghopper Grassland - wet Meadowsweet Common Cicadellidae Alebra wahlbergi A planthopper Grassland - wet Maple Common Cicadellidae Anoscopus albifrons A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Cicadellidae Anoscopus flavostriatus A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Cicadellidae Aphrodes makarovi A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Cicadellidae Arthaldeus pascuellus A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Cicadellidae Cicadella viridis A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Cicadellidae Eupteryx aurata A planthopper Grassland - wet Nettle Common Cicadellidae Eupteryx signatipennis A planthopper Grassland - wet Nettle Local Cicadellidae Eupteryx urticae A planthopper Grassland - wet Nettle Common Cicadellidae Evacanthus interruptus A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Cicadellidae Fagocyba cruenta A planthopper Grassland - wet Hawthorn Common Cicadellidae Macustus grisescens A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Cicadellidae Paluda flaveola A planthopper Grassland - wet Local Cicadellidae Streptanus aemulans A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Coreidae Coreus marginatus Dock bug Grassland - wet Common Delphacidae Conomelus anceps A planthopper Grassland - wet Common Miridae Capsus ater A mirid bug Grassland - wet Widely scattered Miridae Closterotomus norwegicus Potato capsid Grassland - wet Meadowsweet Very common Miridae Dicyphus epilobii A mirid bug Grassland - wet Willowherb Very common Miridae Leptopterna dolabrata A mirid bug Grassland - wet Very common Miridae Lopus decolor A mirid bug Grassland - wet Water mint Widely scattered Miridae Lygocoris pabulinus Common green capsid Grassland - wet Nettle Very common Miridae Neolygus contaminatus A mirid bug Grassland - wet Very common Miridae Neolygus viridis A mirid bug Grassland - wet Maple Common Miridae Orthonotus rufifrons A mirid bug Grassland - wet Cleavers Widely scattered Miridae Orthotylus marginalis A mirid bug Grassland - wet Sallow Very common Miridae Pithanus maerkelii A mirid bug Grassland - wet Widely scattered Miridae Plagiognathus arbustorum A mirid bug Grassland - wet Water mint Very common Miridae Polymerus palustris A mirid bug Grassland - wet Water mint Local Miridae Psallus varians A mirid bug Grassland - wet Hawthorn Very common Nabidae Nabis limbatus Marsh damsel bug Grassland - wet Common Psyllidae Cacopsylla peregrina A psyllid Grassland - wet Hawthorn Very common Psyllidae Psylla alni A psyllid Grassland - wet Alder Common Triozidae Trioza galii A psyllid Grassland - wet Scarce Coleoptera Coccinellidae Halyzia sedecimguttata Orange ladybird Grassland - wet Maple Very widespread Coccinellidae Harmonia axyridis Harlequin ladybird Grassland - wet Maple Ubiquitous Coccinellidae Propylea quattuordecimpunctata 14-spot ladybird Grassland - wet Meadowsweet Ubiquitous Diptera Conopidae Physocephala rufipes A conopid fly Grassland - wet not known Syrphidae Sphaerophoria scripta A hoverfly Grassland - wet Widespread Syrphidae Syritta pipiens A hoverfly Grassland - wet Widespread Lepidoptera Hesperiidae Thymelicus lineola Essex skipper Grassland - wet Common Nymphalidae Aphantopus hyperantus Ringlet Grassland - wet Common Pieris Pieris napi Green-veined white Grassland - wet Common.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Plant Bug Tribe Mirini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) Recorded on the Korean Peninsula, with Descriptions of Three New Species
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 115: 467–492, 2018 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2018.048 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Annotated checklist of the plant bug tribe Mirini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) recorded on the Korean Peninsula, with descriptions of three new species MINSUK OH 1, 2, TOMOHIDE YASUNAGA3, RAM KESHARI DUWAL4 and SEUNGHWAN LEE 1, 2, * 1 Laboratory of Insect Biosystematics, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Research Associate, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Visiting Scientists, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A, 0C6, Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Heteroptera, Miridae, Mirinae, Mirini, checklist, key, new species, new record, Korean Peninsula Abstract. An annotated checklist of the tribe Mirini (Miridae: Mirinae) recorded on the Korean peninsula is presented. A total of 113 species, including newly described and newly recorded species are recognized. Three new species, Apolygus hwasoonanus Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n., A. seonheulensis Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n. and Stenotus penniseticola Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n., are described. Eight species, Apolygus adustus (Jakovlev, 1876), Charagochilus (Charagochilus) longicornis Reuter, 1885, C. (C.) pallidicollis Zheng, 1990, Pinalitopsis rhodopotnia Yasunaga, Schwartz & Chérot, 2002, Philostephanus tibialis (Lu & Zheng, 1998), Rhabdomiris striatellus (Fabricius, 1794), Yamatolygus insulanus Yasunaga, 1992 and Y. pilosus Yasunaga, 1992 are re- ported for the fi rst time from the Korean peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve
    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve Arthropods are characterized by having jointed limbs and exoskeletons. They include a diverse assortment of creatures: Insects, spiders, crustaceans (crayfish, crabs, pill bugs), centipedes and millipedes among others. Column Headings Scientific Name: The phenomenal diversity of arthropods, creates numerous difficulties in the determination of species. Positive identification is often achieved only by specialists using obscure monographs to ‘key out’ a species by examining microscopic differences in anatomy. For our purposes in this survey of the fauna, classification at a lower level of resolution still yields valuable information. For instance, knowing that ant lions belong to the Family, Myrmeleontidae, allows us to quickly look them up on the Internet and be confident we are not being fooled by a common name that may also apply to some other, unrelated something. With the Family name firmly in hand, we may explore the natural history of ant lions without needing to know exactly which species we are viewing. In some instances identification is only readily available at an even higher ranking such as Class. Millipedes are in the Class Diplopoda. There are many Orders (O) of millipedes and they are not easily differentiated so this entry is best left at the rank of Class. A great deal of taxonomic reorganization has been occurring lately with advances in DNA analysis pointing out underlying connections and differences that were previously unrealized. For this reason, all other rankings aside from Family, Genus and Species have been omitted from the interior of the tables since many of these ranks are in a state of flux.
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Taxonomy, Nomenclature, Medicinal and Other Uses, Folklore, and Nature Conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3
    Ulicsni et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2016) 12:47 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0118-7 RESEARCH Open Access Folk knowledge of invertebrates in Central Europe - folk taxonomy, nomenclature, medicinal and other uses, folklore, and nature conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3 Abstract Background: There is scarce information about European folk knowledge of wild invertebrate fauna. We have documented such folk knowledge in three regions, in Romania, Slovakia and Croatia. We provide a list of folk taxa, and discuss folk biological classification and nomenclature, salient features, uses, related proverbs and sayings, and conservation. Methods: We collected data among Hungarian-speaking people practising small-scale, traditional agriculture. We studied “all” invertebrate species (species groups) potentially occurring in the vicinity of the settlements. We used photos, held semi-structured interviews, and conducted picture sorting. Results: We documented 208 invertebrate folk taxa. Many species were known which have, to our knowledge, no economic significance. 36 % of the species were known to at least half of the informants. Knowledge reliability was high, although informants were sometimes prone to exaggeration. 93 % of folk taxa had their own individual names, and 90 % of the taxa were embedded in the folk taxonomy. Twenty four species were of direct use to humans (4 medicinal, 5 consumed, 11 as bait, 2 as playthings). Completely new was the discovery that the honey stomachs of black-coloured carpenter bees (Xylocopa violacea, X. valga)were consumed. 30 taxa were associated with a proverb or used for weather forecasting, or predicting harvests. Conscious ideas about conserving invertebrates only occurred with a few taxa, but informants would generally refrain from harming firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus), field crickets (Gryllus campestris) and most butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera: Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae)
    2018 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 58(1): 207–226 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0018 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Annotated catalogue of the fl ower bugs from India (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae) Chandish R. BALLAL1), Shahid Ali AKBAR2,*), Kazutaka YAMADA3), Aijaz Ahmad WACHKOO4) & Richa VARSHNEY1) 1) National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, India; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Srinagar, 190007 India; e-mail: [email protected] 3) Tokushima Prefectural Museum, Bunka-no-Mori Park, Mukoterayama, Hachiman-cho, Tokushima, 770–8070 Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 4) Department of Zoology, Government Degree College, Shopian, Jammu and Kashmir, 192303 India; e-mail: [email protected] *) Corresponding author Accepted: Abstract. The present paper provides a checklist of the fl ower bug families Anthocoridae th 6 June 2018 and Lasiochilidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of India based on literature and newly collected Published online: specimens including eleven new records. The Indian fauna of fl ower bugs is represented by 73 5th July 2018 species belonging to 26 genera under eight tribes of two families. Generic transfers of Blap- tostethus pluto (Distant, 1910) comb. nov. (from Triphleps pluto Distant, 1910) and Dilasia indica (Muraleedharan, 1978) comb. nov. (from Lasiochilus indica Muraleedharan, 1978) are provided. A lectotype is designated for Blaptostethus pluto. Previous, as well as new, distribu-
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera Checklist
    rECOrd Chester Zoological Gardens Upton, Chester RECORD Cheshire, CH2 1LH Tel: 01244 383749 / 383569 The Biodiversity Information System for [email protected] Cheshire, Halton, Warrington and Wirral Provisional Checklist Of Cheshire Heteroptera (True Bugs) Provided by: Steve Judd - Cheshire County Heteroptera Recorder 20th January 1987 - LCES Report & Proceedings Amended by: Steve J. McWilliam - July 2002 Taken from the Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society (LCES) Report and Annual Proceedings One Hundred and Tenth Session 1986/87, Pages 60-65. The checklist is based on previous county checklists compiled by Whittaker (1906, 1908), Britten (1930) and Massee (1955). Additional unpublished annotations made by Massee to his 1955 checklist were made available by the Biological Records Centre at Monks Wood. Records were extracted from the Lancashire and Cheshire Fauna Committee cards housed at Manchester Museum. Data has been extracted from the Liverpool Museum collection and all post 1970 records are supported by voucher specimens in the Museum's collection. Scientific Name: English Name: National Status: Aradidae: Aradus depressus (F.) Local Acanthosomatidae: Acanthosoma haemorrhoidalis (L.) Hawthorn Shieldbug Common Elasmostethus interstinctus (L.) Birch Shield Bug Common Elasmostethus tristriatus (F.) Juniper Shieldbug Local Elasmucha grisea (L.) Parent Bug Cydnidae: Sehirus bicolor (L.) Common Scutelleridae: Palomena prasina (L.) Green Shieldbug Common Dolycoris baccarum (L.) Sloe Bug Common Piezodorus lituratus (F.) Gorse Shieldbug Common Pentatoma rufipes (L.) Forest Bug Common Picromerus bidens (L.) Common Troilus luridus (F.) Local Rhacognathus punctatus ((L.) Local Zicrona caerulea (L.) Blue Bug Local Coreidae: Coriomeris denticulatus (Scop.) Common Alydidae: Alydus calcaratus (L.) Local Rhopalidae: Corizus hyoscyami ((L.) Local Rhopalus maculatus ((Fieber) Notable B Chorosoma schillingi (Schum.) Local A Company Limited by Guarantee Registered in England No.
    [Show full text]
  • 20140620 Thesis Vanklink
    University of Groningen Of dwarves and giants van Klink, Roel IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Klink, R. (2014). Of dwarves and giants: How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 29-09-2021 Of Dwarves and Giants How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes Roel van Klink This PhD-project was carried out at the Community and Conservation Ecology group, which is part of the Centre for Ecological and Environmental Studies of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • See Possil Marsh Species List
    1 of 37 Possil Marsh Reserve 07/09/2020 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Tetranychidae 1913 1914 1 alga Cladophora glomerata 2017 2017 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2007 2019 3 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 1 amphibian Rana temporaria Common Frog 1966 2019 8 annelid Alboglossiphonia heteroclita 1959 1982 4 annelid Dina lineata 1972 1973 2 annelid Erpobdella octoculata leeches 1913 1914 1 annelid Glossiphonia complanata 1959 1961 2 annelid Haemopis sanguisuga horse leech 1913 1914 1 annelid Helobdella stagnalis 1959 1961 2 annelid Oligochaeta Aquatic Worm 1982 1982 1 annelid Theromyzon tessulatum duck leech 1959 1982 6 bacterium Pseudanabaena 2008 2008 1 bacterium Synechococcus 2008 2008 1 bird Acanthis flammea Common (Mealy) Redpoll 1879 1952 3 bird Acanthis flammea subsp. rostrata Greenland Redpoll 1913 1914 1 bird Accipiter nisus Sparrowhawk 1900 2019 8 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 1879 2020 19 bird Actitis hypoleucos Common Sandpiper 1913 1930 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 1913 2020 13 bird Alauda arvensis Skylark 1913 2012 4 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 1863 2018 10 bird Anas acuta Pintail 1900 1981 4 bird Anas clypeata Shoveler 1913 2019 34 bird Anas crecca Teal 1913 2020 51 bird Anas penelope Wigeon 1913 2020 65 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 1913 2020 34 bird Anas querquedula Garganey 1900 1978 3 bird Anas strepera Gadwall 1982 2018 15 bird Anser albifrons White-fronted Goose 1900 1952 1 bird Anser anser Greylag Goose 1900 2012 5 bird Anthus pratensis
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in Sub-Temperate Zone of Himachal Pradesh (India)
    Research Journal of Chemical and Environmental Sciences Res J. Chem. Environ. Sci. Vol 5 [4] August 2017: 01-08 Online ISSN 2321-1040 CODEN: RJCEA2 [USA] ©Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, INDIA RRJJCCEESS Website: www.aelsindia.com/rjces.htm ORIGINAL ARTICLE Distribution and seasonal activity of anthocorid bugs (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in sub-temperate zone of Himachal Pradesh (India) Nisha Devi1, P.R Gupta2 and Budhi Ram3 1-3 Dr Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Department of Entomology, Nauni Solan- (Himachal Pradesh) 173230- India. Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Periodical field surveys carried out to record the distribution of anthocorid bugs on different flora infested with soft- bodied insect and mite pests. Present study revealed that both the prey and predators were associated with different plants hosts; their activity was noticed on various plants including vegetable crops, fruit crops, ornamentals and forest- wild flora. During field survey anthocorid bugs belonging to three genera and five species were identified which were:Anthocorisconfusus Reuter, Anthocoris dividens Bu and Zheng, belonging to Anthocorini tribe, Orius bifilarus Ghauriand Orius niger Wolff (tribe oriini) and Lippomanus brevicornis Yamada. Orius bifilarus was the predominant species on annual crops and was associated with 16 host plants, whereas O. niger was associated with 7 host plants. Both the species of Anthocoris, i.e. A. confusus and A. dividens were found to be associated primarily with one host plants, viz. Prunus persica and Bauhinia vahlii, respectively. Anthocorid bugs commenced their field activity in March, which continued throughout the year up to November on one or other crop or flora depending upon abundance of the prey for their multiplication.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev Iss Web Jpe 12709 53-6 1823..1830
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Epsilon Open Archive Journal of Applied Ecology 2016, 53, 1823–1830 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12709 Predator refuges for conservation biological control in an intermediately disturbed system: the rise and fall of a simple solution Anna-Sara Liman*, Karin Eklund and Christer Bjorkman€ Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O Box 7044, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden Summary 1. Managed systems harvested at intermediate time-scales have advantages over annual short-cycled systems in maintaining top-down control of insect herbivores, and the flexible harvest regimes in these systems provide opportunities for habitat management that can stabi- lize predator–prey population dynamics across harvests – resulting in reduced risk of pest outbreaks. 2. In a large-scale field experiment, we explored whether retaining refuges, that is preserving parts of the stand to reduce predator mortality, could reduce the risk of pest insect outbreaks in willow short-rotation coppice. Population densities of three omnivorous predator species and three outbreaking herbivorous leaf beetle species were monitored over four years after coppice (stem harvest) in eight stands with refuges (treatment) and eight stands without refuges (control). Predation pressure was estimated in years three and four. 3. Contrary to our predictions, leaf beetle densities were higher in stands with refuges and predator densities were higher in stands without refuges. Leaf beetle egg mortality increased with total predator density, but did not differ between stands with and without refuges. 4. These unexpected results can be attributed to interactions between dispersal and patch age.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Trapping of Kleidocerys Trunculatus (Or K
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Greenwich Academic Literature Archive Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (GALA) – the University of Greenwich open access repository http://gala.gre.ac.uk __________________________________________________________________________________________ Citation for published version: Reynolds, Don R., Nau, Bernard S. and Chapman, Jason W. (2013) High-altitude migration of Heteroptera in Britain. European Journal of Entomology, 110 (3). pp. 483-492. ISSN 1210-5759 (Print), 1802-8829 (Online) (doi:10.14411/eje.2013.064) Publisher’s version available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.14411/eje.2013.064 __________________________________________________________________________________________ Please note that where the full text version provided on GALA is not the final published version, the version made available will be the most up-to-date full-text (post-print) version as provided by the author(s). Where possible, or if citing, it is recommended that the publisher’s (definitive) version be consulted to ensure any subsequent changes to the text are noted. Citation for this version held on GALA: Reynolds, Don R., Nau, Bernard S. and Chapman, Jason W. (2013) High-altitude migration of Heteroptera in Britain. London: Greenwich Academic Literature Archive. Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/12196/ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Contact: [email protected] This is the Author's Accepted Manuscript version, uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Please note: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY and published 11 July 2013 by the Institute of Entomology (Czech Republic). Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as editing, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Through Arthropod Eyes Gaining Mechanistic Understanding of Calcareous Grassland Diversity
    Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Toos van Noordwijk Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Van Noordwijk, C.G.E. 2014. Through arthropod eyes. Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Keywords: Biodiversity, chalk grassland, dispersal tactics, conservation management, ecosystem restoration, fragmentation, grazing, insect conservation, life‑history strategies, traits. ©2014, C.G.E. van Noordwijk ISBN: 978‑90‑77522‑06‑6 Printed by: Gildeprint ‑ Enschede Lay‑out: A.M. Antheunisse Cover photos: Aart Noordam (Bijenwolf, Philanthus triangulum) Toos van Noordwijk (Laamhei) The research presented in this thesis was financially spupported by and carried out at: 1) Bargerveen Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2) Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3) Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Belgium. The research was in part commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation as part of the O+BN program (Development and Management of Nature Quality). Financial support from Radboud University for printing this thesis is gratefully acknowledged. Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann volgens besluit van het college van decanen en ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de biologie aan de Universiteit Gent op gezag van de rector prof. dr. Anne De Paepe, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 26 augustus 2014 om 10.30 uur precies door Catharina Gesina Elisabeth van Noordwijk geboren op 9 februari 1981 te Smithtown, USA Promotoren: Prof.
    [Show full text]