World War I and the Remaking of Jewish Vilna, 1914-1918 A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World War I and the Remaking of Jewish Vilna, 1914-1918 A WORLD WAR I AND THE REMAKING OF JEWISH VILNA, 1914-1918 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ANDREW N. KOSS AUGUST 2010 © 2010 by Andrew Noble Koss. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/wp368wc8732 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Steven Zipperstein, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Norman Naimark I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Aron Rodrigue Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii Abstract This study argues for the importance of World War I in the history of Jewish life in Russia and Eastern Europe through an analysis of Jewish politics, society, and culture in the city of Vilna/Vilnius from 1914 to 1918. The First World War is a subject that has received only minimal attention in the historiography of East European Jewry. The war brought vast disruption to Vilna, ushering in a period of immense suffering as thousands of Jews died of starvation and disease. At the same time, after over a century and a quarter of Russian rule, the city fell under the control of a German military regime that both ruthlessly exploited the local population and granted it freedoms of expression, association, and education that had been unheard of under the Tsars, even guaranteeing equal rights to Jews and non-Jews. While the material deprivations of war tore asunder the fabric of Jewish society, sweeping away established practice and institutions, a new generation of modernizing, nationalist intellectuals and activists came to power within Vilna‟s Jewish community. They took advantage of both newfound freedoms and the collapse of old social structures to found new institutions and to recreate Jewish politics and civil society on the basis of secular nationalism. The war years served as a proving ground on which they could test the new ideas about Jewish society and politics that had been gestating in Jewish minds, journals, and salons during the previous half-century. The trends that emerged during the war laid the foundations for Jewish life in Vilna in the two decades between the World Wars. Chapter 1, “Leadership,” discusses the revolution that occurred in Jewish communal politics during the war. It shows how a group of community activists moved from the margins of political life to its center, and used the war as an opportunity to reform communal government. Despite strict restrictions on political activity, these leaders were nonetheless able to achieve de facto Jewish autonomy under German rule. This chapter also addresses the protracted struggle of the Jewish government with German authorities over forced labor and collective taxation. Chapter 2, “Community and Culture,” deals with the flourishing of Jewish civil society during the war years. It examines the demise of traditional religious associations and the simultaneous expansion of new economic, social, and cultural institutions. It also addressed the role these new organizational structures played in the new Jewish communal politics. Chapter 3, “Education and Cultural Politics,” describes the explosion of new Jewish educational institutions under the German occupation. The proliferation of new schools in turn led to a fierce struggle over their content and curricula, which became a battle-ground for various Jewish political ideologies. Chapter 4, “Memory,” discusses the perception of World War I during the war itself; Vilna Jewry‟s attempts to record the history of the war while it was still ongoing and immediately after it ended; and the legacy of these commemorative projects. It is my contention that contemporary perceptions of the war‟s importance shaped the actions of communal leaders discussed in previous chapters and thus Vilna‟s wartime trajectory itself. This chapter concludes by showing how the attempts of Vilna‟s Jewish intelligentsia to create a historical record of their wartime experiences and iv achievements served as a template for an entire genre of commemorative works that appeared in subsequent decades. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The assistance of many people has made the completion of this dissertation possible. First and foremost I would like to thank my academic advisor, Steven Zipperstein, whose guidance, insightful comments, wisdom, and patience have helped turn this work into what it is and helped me cultivate myself as a scholar. Norman Naimark and Aron Rodrigue provided many helpful comments and suggestions regarding the dissertation itself, and have done much to shape my understanding of history in general. James Sheehan, Michael Silber, and Ada Rapoport-Albert all did much to broaden and deepen my approach to history and Jewish studies during my first years of graduate school. I learned much through conversations with Gabriella Safran, who also kindly shared with me portions of the manuscript of her forthcoming biography of S. An-sky. A conversation with Gennady Estraikh did much to help me shape my argument in Chapter 2. Professor Estraikh was also kind enough to show me an unpublished manuscript of his on Yiddish and Civil Society. I also have benefitted from having many excellent language instructors and would especially like to thank Ania Kieturakis of Stanford for patiently guiding me through the mysteries of Polish. I must also thank numerous librarians and archivists. Zachary Baker of Stanford fielded many bibliographic queries for me and shared his vast knowledge of Jewish Vilna. Yeshaya Metal of the YIVO library spent much time tracking down obscure and difficult to find books and journals and also helped me solve a solve a small mystery. Herbert Lazarus made countless trips to the stack to bring me the materials I needed. I also wish to thank Gunnar Berg and Leo Greenbaum of the YIVO Archives, Sherry Hyman and Shelley Helfand of the JDC Archives, the staff of vi the Dorot Jewish Division at the New York Public Library, Joanna Newman of the Jewish Theological Seminary Library, and the staff of the Hoover Institution Archives. Throughout the process of attaining my PhD, I have been fortunate enough to have had the love and support of friends and family. Dina Danon, Dan Heller, and others made graduate school a far more pleasant experience than it might have otherwise been. I would also like to thank my parents, Marvin and Lynn Koss, and my brother, Jonathan Koss, for their constant encouragement. Above all, I wish to express my gratitude to my wife, Alison Hornstein Koss. She read several chapters of the dissertation when they were in dire need of help and gave me invaluable advice about how to restructure them; in addition, she spent many hours reading and correcting the final version with her careful editor‟s eye. More importantly, I benefitted immensely from her emotional support and devotion, her forbearance as I neglected her for many evenings and weekends to work on my dissertation, and her genuine interest when I allowed Vilna dominate countless conversation. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS AUTHOR’S NOTE ........................................................................................................... x INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1: LEADERSHIP ....................................................................................... 48 CHAPTER 2: COMMUNITY AND CULTURE ..................................................... 101 CHAPTER 3: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL POLITICS ............................... 160 CHAPTER 4: MEMORY ............................................................................................ 226 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 271 AUTHOR’S NOTE As is true with most works about Eastern Europe (and many other parts of the world), issues of transliteration, spelling of names of places and people, and dates cause problems for the author that cannot be solved easily. These problems are aggravated by the fact that official languages and calendars changed during the war itself in the period in question. As a rule, I have followed the Library of Congress systems for transliterating Hebrew (eliminating diacritics), Yiddish, and Russian. For titles and quotations in Yiddish, I have transliterated according to the spellings used in the original texts, rather than according to contemporary standard spellings. For the names of individuals who had reason to employ the Roman alphabet, I have generally followed the spelling they themselves preferred. I have also taken account individuals‟ own language of choice and the spellings employed by the recently released YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in
Recommended publications
  • Lithuanian Synagogues: from the First Descriptions to Systematic Research
    arts Article Lithuanian Synagogues: From the First Descriptions to Systematic Research Vilma Gradinskaite Independent scholar, 05224 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] Received: 4 March 2020; Accepted: 15 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: The article presents an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania during the four major historical periods of the country—Lithuania in the Russian Empire (1795–1918), Vilnius Region in the interwar period and the independent Republic of Lithuania (1918–1940), the Soviet period (1940–1990), and the independent Republic of Lithuania restored in 1990. Each chapter of the article deals with the issues of synagogue research, heritage conservation and management, while the part about the restored independent Republic of Lithuania and modern days includes topical issues related to synagogue restoration, commemoration and putting them into operation. The study uses two different sources: archival materials and publications. Written sources and publications are reviewed in chronological order and start from the end of the 18th century. The study employs several research methods—the historical descriptive method, the comparative method and the analysis method. Keywords: Lithuania; synagogues; conservation; restoration; renovation; rebuilding; management; commemoration 1. Introduction The article presents several fields of study: (1) a review of the first descriptions of synagogues in Lithuania; (2) an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania; and (3) a brief reference to synagogue restoration, renovation, rebuilding, commemoration and putting into operation—topics which are currently particularly live in Lithuania today. It is not possible to understand the existing trends in synagogue research in Lithuania without considering the country’s past—the times of the Russian Empire, the interwar period and the Soviet period.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversations with Stalin on Questions of Political Economy”
    WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Lee H. Hamilton, Conversations with Stalin on Christian Ostermann, Director Director Questions of Political Economy BOARD OF TRUSTEES: ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., by Chairman William Taubman Steven Alan Bennett, Ethan Pollock (Amherst College) Vice Chairman Chairman Working Paper No. 33 PUBLIC MEMBERS Michael Beschloss The Secretary of State (Historian, Author) Colin Powell; The Librarian of Congress James H. Billington James H. Billington; (Librarian of Congress) The Archivist of the United States John W. Carlin; Warren I. Cohen The Chairman of the (University of Maryland- National Endowment Baltimore) for the Humanities Bruce Cole; The Secretary of the John Lewis Gaddis Smithsonian Institution (Yale University) Lawrence M. Small; The Secretary of Education James Hershberg Roderick R. Paige; (The George Washington The Secretary of Health University) & Human Services Tommy G. Thompson; Washington, D.C. Samuel F. Wells, Jr. PRIVATE MEMBERS (Woodrow Wilson Center) Carol Cartwright, July 2001 John H. Foster, Jean L. Hennessey, Sharon Wolchik Daniel L. Lamaute, (The George Washington Doris O. Mausui, University) Thomas R. Reedy, Nancy M. Zirkin COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pakn Treger Translation Issue
    Table of Contents “You Have Not Betrayed Me Since the Day We Met” and “You Olive Tree in the Night” by Avrom Sutzkver, translated by Maia Evrona “On the Landing” by Yenta Mash, translated by Ellen Cassedy “From Eternity to Eternity: Thoughts and Considerations in Honor of Passover” by Moyshe Shtarkman, translated by Ross Perlin “In Which I Hate It and Can’t Stand It and Don’t Want to and Have No Patience at All” by Der Tunkeler, translated by Ri J. Turner “Letters” by H.D. Nomberg, translated by Daniel Kennedy “Blind Folye” by Froyim Kaganovski, translated by Beverly Bracha Weingrod “Mr. Friedkin and Shoshana: Wandering Souls on the Lower East Side” (an excerpt from Hibru) by Joseph Opatoshu, translated by Shulamith Z. Berger “Coney Island, Part Three” by Victor Packer, translated by Henry Sapoznik “Old Town” (an excerpt from The Strong and the Weak) by Alter Kacyzne, translated by Mandy Cohen and Michael Casper An Excerpt from “Once Upon a Time, Vilna” by Abraham Karpinowitz, translated by Helen Mintz “To a Fellow Writer” and “Shloyme Mikhoels” by Rachel H. Korn, translated by Seymour Levitan “The Destiny of a Poem” by Itzik Manger, translated by Murray Citron “The Blind Man” by Itsik Kipnis, translated by Joshua Snider Introduction he translation theorist Lawrence Venuti closes his short essay “How to Read a Translation” on a note of defiance: T Don’t take one translation of a foreign literature to be representative of the language, he tells us. Compare the translation to other translations from the same language. Venuti’s point is both political and moral.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuanian Jews and the Holocaust
    Ezra’s Archives | 77 Strategies of Survival: Lithuanian Jews and the Holocaust Taly Matiteyahu On the eve of World War II, Lithuanian Jewry numbered approximately 220,000. In June 1941, the war between Germany and the Soviet Union began. Within days, Germany had occupied the entirety of Lithuania. By the end of 1941, only about 43,500 Lithuanian Jews (19.7 percent of the prewar population) remained alive, the majority of whom were kept in four ghettos (Vilnius, Kaunas, Siauliai, Svencionys). Of these 43,500 Jews, approximately 13,000 survived the war. Ultimately, it is estimated that 94 percent of Lithuanian Jewry died during the Holocaust, a percentage higher than in any other occupied Eastern European country.1 Stories of Lithuanian towns and the manner in which Lithuanian Jews responded to the genocide have been overlooked as the perpetrator- focused version of history examines only the consequences of the Holocaust. Through a study utilizing both historical analysis and testimonial information, I seek to reconstruct the histories of Lithuanian Jewish communities of smaller towns to further understand the survival strategies of their inhabitants. I examined a variety of sources, ranging from scholarly studies to government-issued pamphlets, written testimonies and video testimonials. My project centers on a collection of 1 Population estimates for Lithuanian Jews range from 200,000 to 250,000, percentages of those killed during Nazi occupation range from 90 percent to 95 percent, and approximations of the number of survivors range from 8,000 to 20,000. Here I use estimates provided by Dov Levin, a prominent international scholar of Eastern European Jewish history, in the Introduction to Preserving Our Litvak Heritage: A History of 31 Jewish Communities in Lithuania.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections
    Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections David Hirsh Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK The Working Papers Series is intended to initiate discussion, debate and discourse on a wide variety of issues as it pertains to the analysis of antisemitism, and to further the study of this subject matter. Please feel free to submit papers to the ISGAP working paper series. Contact the ISGAP Coordinator or the Editor of the Working Paper Series, Charles Asher Small. Working Paper Hirsh 2007 ISSN: 1940-610X © Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy ISGAP 165 East 56th Street, Second floor New York, NY 10022 United States Office Telephone: 212-230-1840 www.isgap.org ABSTRACT This paper aims to disentangle the difficult relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. On one side, antisemitism appears as a pressing contemporary problem, intimately connected to an intensification of hostility to Israel. Opposing accounts downplay the fact of antisemitism and tend to treat the charge as an instrumental attempt to de-legitimize criticism of Israel. I address the central relationship both conceptually and through a number of empirical case studies which lie in the disputed territory between criticism and demonization. The paper focuses on current debates in the British public sphere and in particular on the campaign to boycott Israeli academia. Sociologically the paper seeks to develop a cosmopolitan framework to confront the methodological nationalism of both Zionism and anti-Zionism. It does not assume that exaggerated hostility to Israel is caused by underlying antisemitism but it explores the possibility that antisemitism may be an effect even of some antiracist forms of anti- Zionism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Migration of Lithuanian Jews to the United States, 1880 – 1918, and the Decisions Involved in the Process, Exemplified by Five Individual Migration Stories
    Nathan T. Shapiro Hofstra University Department of Global Studies and Geography The Migration of Lithuanian Jews to the United States, 1880 – 1918, and the Decisions Involved in the Process, Exemplified by Five Individual Migration Stories Honors Thesis in Geography Advisor: Dr. Kari B. Jensen Shapiro 1 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 Jews in Lita and Reasons for Their Emigration According to the Literature ..................... 5 Migration Theory .............................................................................................................. 11 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 14 Case studies: Five Personal Migration Stories .................................................................. 16 Concluding Remarks ......................................................................................................... 35 Endnote ............................................................................................................................. 39 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 40 Appendix ........................................................................................................................... 43 Figure 1: Europe 1871 ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Hygiene Department of Stephen Bathory University in the Development and Promotion of Public Health in Vilnius in the Years 1922–1939
    Science in Poland Aistis Žalnora ORCID 000-0002-2382-370X Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius University (Vilnius, Lithuania) [email protected] The role of the Hygiene Department of Stephen Bathory University in the development and promotion of Public Health in Vilnius in the years 1922–1939 Abstract Objective: During the interwar period, the healthcare system in Europe experienced a dramatic transformation. It was perceived that preventive medicine was no less important than curative medicine. Moreover, without proper prevention of the so-called social diseases, all later therapeutic measures were expensive and ineffective. The former battle against the consequences was re- placed by measures targeting the causes. The fight against so- cial diseases involved a state-owned strategy and a broad arsenal of measures. The University’s scholars also took part in this PUBLICATION e-ISSN 2543-702X INFO ISSN 2451-3202 DIAMOND OPEN ACCESS CITATION Žalnora, Aistis 2018: The role of the Hygiene Department of Stephen Bathory University in the development and promotion of Public Health in Vilnius in the years 1922–1939. Studia Historiae Scientiarum 17, pp. 51–87. Available online: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.004.9324. ARCHIVE RECEIVED: 2.04.2018 LICENSE POLICY ACCEPTED: 22.10.2018 Green SHERPA / PUBLISHED ONLINE: 12.12.2018 RoMEO Colour WWW http://www.ejournals.eu/sj/index.php/SHS/; http://pau.krakow.pl/Studia-Historiae-Scientiarum/ Aistis Žalnora The role of the Hygiene Department of Stephen Bathory University... process. Our study revealed that the significance of the disease prevention in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Ste- phen Bathory was well understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Ignaz Goldziher Example
    147-105 :5 ,2020 / ديسمبر / Aralık / December A Study on the Historical Foundations of Jewish Orientalism: Ignaz Goldziher Example Yahudi Oryantalizminin Tarihi Temelleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Ignaz Goldziher Örneği دراسة حول ا ألسس التارخيية لﻻسترشاق الهيودي: اجنا س جودلتس هير منوذج ا Hafize Yazıcı Arş. Gör. Atatürk Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi, Erzurum/Türkiye Res. Ast., Ataturk University Faculty of Theology, Erzurum/Turkey [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6675-5890 Makale Bilgisi | Article Information Makalenin Türü / Article Type : Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article Geliş Tarihi / Received Date: 12.12.2020 Kabul Tarihi / Accepted Date: 30.12.2020 Yayın Tarihi / Published Date: 31.12.2020 Yayın Sezonu / Publication Date Season: Aralık / December DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4429234 Yazıcı, Hafize. “A Study on the Historical Foundations of Jewish Orientalism: Ignaz Goldziher : ا قتباس / Atıf / Citation Example / Yahudi Oryantalizminin Tarihi Temelleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Ignaz Goldziher Örneği”. HADITH 5 (Aralık/December 2020): 105-147. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4429234. İntihal: Bu makale, iTenticate yazılımınca taranmıştır. İntihal tespit edilmemiştir. Plagiarism: This article has been scanned by iThenticate. No plagiarism has been detected. انتحال: مت فحص البحث بواسطة برانمج ﻷجل السرقة العلمية فلم يتم إجياد أي سرقة علمية. web: http://dergipark.gov.tr/hadith | mailto: [email protected] HADITH 5 (Aralık/December 2020): 105-147 A Study on the Historical Foundations of Jewish Orientalism: Ignaz Goldziher Example Hafize YAZICI Keywords: ABSTRACT Jewish Orientalism While Christians had a long history of Islamic Studies in the West, Jewish also made remarkable Islām contributions to this field beginning from the early periods, and they have had a pioneering role Judaism in this field thanks to the scientists they educated.
    [Show full text]
  • Ber Borochov's
    Science in Context 20(2), 341–352 (2007). Copyright C Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0269889707001299 Printed in the United Kingdom Ber Borochov’s “The Tasks of Yiddish Philology” Barry Trachtenberg University at Albany Argument Ber Borochov (1881–1917), the Marxist Zionist revolutionary who founded the political party Poyle Tsien (Workers of Zion), was also one of the key theoreticians of Yiddish scholarship. His landmark 1913 essay, “The Tasks of Yiddish Philology,” was his first contribution to the field and crowned him as its chief ideologue. Modeled after late nineteenth-century European movements of linguistic nationalism, “The Tasks” was the first articulation of Yiddish scholarship as a discrete field of scientific research. His tasks ranged from the practical: creating a standardized dictionary and grammar, researching the origins and development of the language, and establishing a language institute; to the overtly ideological: the “nationalizing and humanizing” of the Yiddish language and its speakers. The essay brought a new level of sophistication to the field, established several of its ideological pillars, and linked Yiddish scholarship to the material needs of the Jewish people. Although “The Tasks” was greeted with a great deal of skepticism upon its publication, after his death, Borochov became widely accepted as the “founder” of modern Yiddish studies. “As long as a people remain ‘illiterate’ in their own language, one cannot yet speak of a national culture” (Borochov 1913, page 355 in this issue) When Ber Borochov’s manifesto “The Tasks of Yiddish Philology” appeared in 1913, few people could imagine that Yiddish was substantial enough to be the basis of a new scholarly discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Semitic Component in Yiddish and Its Ideological Role in Yiddish Philology
    philological encounters � (�0�7) 368-387 brill.com/phen The Semitic Component in Yiddish and its Ideological Role in Yiddish Philology Tal Hever-Chybowski Paris Yiddish Center—Medem Library [email protected] Abstract The article discusses the ideological role played by the Semitic component in Yiddish in four major texts of Yiddish philology from the first half of the 20th century: Ysroel Haim Taviov’s “The Hebrew Elements of the Jargon” (1904); Ber Borochov’s “The Tasks of Yiddish Philology” (1913); Nokhem Shtif’s “The Social Differentiation of Yiddish: Hebrew Elements in the Language” (1929); and Max Weinreich’s “What Would Yiddish Have Been without Hebrew?” (1931). The article explores the ways in which these texts attribute various religious, national, psychological and class values to the Semitic com- ponent in Yiddish, while debating its ontological status and making prescriptive sug- gestions regarding its future. It argues that all four philologists set the Semitic component of Yiddish in service of their own ideological visions of Jewish linguistic, national and ethnic identity (Yiddishism, Hebraism, Soviet Socialism, etc.), thus blur- ring the boundaries between descriptive linguistics and ideologically engaged philology. Keywords Yiddish – loshn-koydesh – semitic philology – Hebraism – Yiddishism – dehebraization Yiddish, although written in the Hebrew alphabet, is predominantly Germanic in its linguistic structure and vocabulary.* It also possesses substantial Slavic * The comments of Yitskhok Niborski, Natalia Krynicka and of the anonymous reviewer have greatly improved this article, and I am deeply indebted to them for their help. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi �0.��63/�45�9�97-��Downloaded34003� from Brill.com09/23/2021 11:50:14AM via free access The Semitic Component In Yiddish 369 and Semitic elements, and shows some traces of the Romance languages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Death of Socialist Zionism
    The Life and Death of Socialist Zionism Jason Schulman (Published in New Politics, vol. 9, no. 3 (new series), whole no. 35, Summer 2003) In previous decades it was not uncommon for democratic leftists, Jewish ones in particular, to believe that the state of Israel was on the road to exemplifying—as Irving Howe once put it—“the democratic socialist hope of combining radical social change with political freedom.”1 But times have obviously changed. Today, no one would argue with the assertion that Israeli socialism is “is going the way of the kibbutz farmer,” even if the government continues to be the major shareholder in many Israeli banks, retains majority control in state-owned enterprises, owns a considerable percent of the country's land, and exerts considerable influence in most sectors of the economy.2 The kibbutzim themselves, held up as “the essence of the socialist-Zionist ideal of collectivism and egalitarianism,” are fast falling victim “to the pursuit of individual fulfillment.”3 The Labor Party is ever more estranged from Israel’s trade union movement, and when it governs it does so less and less like a social-democratic party, and its economic program has become ever more classically liberal. To many Israelis, who remember the years of Labor bureaucratic power, “socialism” means little more than “state elitism.” In examining “what happened,” it is worthwhile to ask what precisely the content of Israeli socialism was from its inception. There are essentially two narratives of “actually-existing” Labor (Socialist) Zionism. One argues that the most important of the Zionist colonists were utopian socialists who had no intent to be either exploiter or exploited.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS the ORIGIN of the LITVAK? the LEGACY of the GRAND DUCHY of LITHUANIA © Antony Polonsky 266
    WHAT IS THE ORIGIN OF THE LITVAK? THE LEGACY OF THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA © Antony Polonsky 266 By the end of the nineteenth century, the concept of the „Litvak" had become well- established in the Jewish world. Let me give a few literary examples. I will begin with two by non-Litvaks. In one of his „hasidic tales", „Tsvishn tsvay berg" (Be- tween Two Mountains), Yitshak Leibush Peretz describes the conflict between the hasidim and their mitnagdic opponents. He gives both sides their voice but clearly comes down on the side of the former. The story recounts the clash between the Brisker rov and his best pupil, who has left him to found a hasidic court. He ex- plains why: Your Torah, Rabbi, is nothing but law. It is without pity. Your Torah contains not a spark of compas- sion. And that is why it is without joy, without air to breathe. It is nothing but steel and iron-iron commandments, copper laws. It is a very refined Torah, suitable for scholars, for the select few. The Brisker rov was silent, so the rebbe continued: „Tell me, Rabbi, what have you got for ordinary people? For the woodchopper, the butcher, the tradesman, the simple man? And, most especially for the sinful man? What do you have to offer those who are not scholars?...". To convince the Brisker rov, the Bialer rebbe takes him to see his followers on Simkhat torah when they are transformed by the festival. This does not convince the Brisker rov. „We must say the afternoon prayer," the Brisker rov suddenly announced in his harsh voice-and eve- rything vanished.
    [Show full text]