DOCSLIB.ORG

Matamata-Piako District Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 APPENDIX A BEFORE THE WAIKATO REGIONAL TRANSPORT COMMITTEE IN THE MATTER of the the Land Transport Management Act 2003 AND IN THE MATTER of the review of the Draft Waikato Regional Land Transport Strategy 2011 - 2041 AND IN THE MATTER of submissions to the Draft Waikato Regional Land Transport Strategy 2011 - 2041 JOINT SUBMISSIONS OF: HAURAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL; and MATAMATA-PIAKO DISTRICT COUNCIL Joint Submissions to the RLTS by Hauraki District Council and Matamata-Piako District Council Page 1 of 23 2 December 2010 INTRODUCTION This is a joint submission on the Draft Waikato Regional Land Transport Strategy 2011 – 2041 (RLTS) by the Hauraki and Matamata-Piako District Councils (the Councils). The Councils generally support the RLTS. The document is visionary without being overly ambitious. It is balanced, comprehensive, well-written, well structured, and easy to navigate and understand. The language is positive and encouraging and the tenor of the document reflects a participatory and consultative approach. This bodes well for the successful implementation of the strategy that will ultimately be dependent upon the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) and Environment Waikato (EW) working in close partnership, and with “buy in” from, the constituent Territorial Authorities (TAs) in the Region. The Councils consider that the RLTS, while comprehensive, can benefit from the inclusion of further, more detailed, information regarding the origin and destination of freight movements, within and through, the Region. The Councils understand that further investigations into freight movements are currently being undertaken as part of a parallel study into the preferred routes for High Productivity Motor Vehicles. The Councils recommend that a summary of the findings of this parallel study be included into the Final RLTS. The inclusion of further information regarding freight movements, will assist stakeholders in understanding the logistics involved, and the economic opportunities for freight handling and distribution within the Region. The Councils’ more specific submissions in respect of the various parts of the RLTS are shown in the Tables below. The Tables provide: A reference to the relevant page number in the RLTS (EW Document 17207111, undated); The nature of the submission; The submitter [e.g. the Hauraki District Council (HDC); or Matamata-Piako District Council (MPDC); or both Councils]. Joint Submissions to the RLTS by Hauraki District Council and Matamata-Piako District Council Page 2 of 23 3 Where specific wording changes are requested, proposed deletions are shown in strikethrough, and additions in bold red text. Paragraph numbers as per the RLTS have been retained. 3.0 Vision and outcomes for the Waikato Region Page Submission Submitter 19 3.2 Vision - The Councils support the RLTS’s HDC & comprehensive and aspirational “Vision” of “an affordable, MPDC integrated, safe, responsive and sustainable land transport system that enhances the environmental, economic, social and cultural wellbeing of the population”. 19 3.3.1 Outcome for Integration - The Councils support the HDC & recognition given in the “Outcome for Integration” to MPDC “collaborative planning and partnerships”. 20 3.3.2 Outcome for Economic Development - The Councils HDC & support the emphasis that the RLTS places on the need to MPDC promote economic activity. 20 -21 3.3.3, 3.3.4 3.3.5 Outcomes for Safety, Access, Mobility HDC & and Public Health - The Councils support the RLTS’s MPDC emphasis on safety, and acknowledgement of the need to improve access to public transport (also for the small provincial towns in recognition of the needs of an ageing population, and the demand for total mobility where mobility access is unable to be provided for as part of the public transport system). 21 3.3.6 Outcome for Environmental Sustainability - The HDC & Councils support the recognition given in the “Environmental MPDC Outcome” sought by the RLTS to, first and foremost, retain efficiency in the transport system, while recognising the need for adaptability and resilience in the face emerging long-term influences. Joint Submissions to the RLTS by Hauraki District Council and Matamata-Piako District Council Page 3 of 23 4 4.0 Strategic approach for the strategy Page Submission Submitter 23 – 30 The Councils support the composite option (e.g. strategic HDC & corridors, demand management, and road safety) selected MPDC as the RLTS’s preferred strategic approach. 5.0 Key regional challenges for the Waikato Region Page Submission Submitter 31-46 Chapter 5 of the RLTS presents a balanced view of the key HDC & challenges facing the Region. The Councils particularly MPDC support the following two high priority regional challenges identified in the RLTS: Promoting opportunities to optimise investment in the Waikato Expressway by ensuring integration with the local road network; and: Addressing the need for better access to services for rural communities. 46 High priority regional challenges - The Councils consider HDC & that the diversion of available funding towards the early MPDC completion of the Waikato Expressway with a potential funding “gap” for improvements to (and maintenance of) the remainder of the Region’s main thoroughfares and strategic corridors, will present particular challenges over the term of the RLTS. The Councils consider that it will be beneficial to identify the likely funding “gap” created by the priority placed on completion of the Expressway, as a ninth high priority regional challenge. Joint Submissions to the RLTS by Hauraki District Council and Matamata-Piako District Council Page 4 of 23 5 6.0 Policy framework for the RLTS Page Submission Submitter 49 - 54 The Councils generally support the Policy Framework and HDC & Guiding Principles as outlined in Chapter 6 of the RLTS with MPDC the two provisos outlined below: 52 P.P 1 – The Councils have concerns with some of the RPS HDC & integrated land use policies and principles that are MPDC referenced in RLTS Principle P.P 1 (p52). The Councils intend to submit on these provisions through the RPS Schedule 1 process. 52 P.P 2 – All of the small rural towns within HDC and MPDC HDC & are bisected by state highways. While the Councils support MPDC the protection of the State Highway Network as essential strategic corridors for intra and inter-regional transport, it must be recognised that these routes also serve a local transport function, embedded within the historical development of some rural towns. The Councils wish the local function of urban sections of the State Highway Network within rural towns to be recognised and do not want the development of the towns to be constrained by an overly protectionist regulatory regime. Joint Submissions to the RLTS by Hauraki District Council and Matamata-Piako District Council Page 5 of 23 6 7.0 Regional policies and actions Page Submission Submitter 55 – 68 The Councils generally support the Regional Policies and HDC & Actions as set out in Chapter 7 of the RLTS, with the MPDC following comments: 7.2.1/ 7.2.2 Integrated land use and transport policies and actions Page Submission Submitter 55 P 7.2- This Policy requires the transport system to be HDC & managed in a way that is consistent with the integrated land MPDC use policies in the RPS. As mentioned before, the Councils intend to challenge certain of the RPS policies and methods through the separate RPS Schedule 1 process. 56 A 7.3 – This action requires EW to coordinate the HDC & development of a regionally consistent road hierarchy to MPDC protect strategic corridors. The Councils support a regionally consistent approach but wish the local function of urban sections of the State Highway system within rural towns to be recognised and provided for in the development of a roading hierarchy. The Councils also wish to retain the ability to negotiate with NZTA directly on new access points to the State Highway Network, where exceptions to the hierarchy need to be made to ensure the future development of rural towns. 56 A 7.6 & A 7.7– It is recommended that the wording of these HDC & actions be amended in the manner as indicated below, to MPDC enable “trade-offs” to be made between transport and other environmental effects (and recognition given to funding constraints) when considering planning instruments, Joint Submissions to the RLTS by Hauraki District Council and Matamata-Piako District Council Page 6 of 23 7 LTCCPs and Annual Plans: “Territorial authorities and Environment Waikato will ensure statutory and non-statutory land use and transport planning documents are generally consistent with and responsive to the Regional Land Transport Strategy”. “Territorial Authorities and Environment Waikato will ensure that Long Term Council Community Plans and Annual Plans are generally aligned with and give effect to the Regional Land Transport Strategy and Regional Land Transport Programme”. 57 A 7.12 – Under this action, the RTC will advocate for HDC & regional spatial planning. The Councils support the region- MPDC wide context for spatial planning, but on the understanding that spatial planning is a TA function. 7.3.2 Freight and economic development actions Page Submission Submitter 58 A 7.15 – This action requires TAs to identify and manage HDC & routes for aggregate haulage. The Councils do not support MPDC this approach which seeks to create advantages (“pick winners”) for certain industries (e.g. aggregates, in this instance), while the same support is not provided for other industries that are also
Recommended publications
  • Hauraki District Council Candidates’ Stance on Arts and Creativity

    Hauraki District Council Candidates’ Stance on Arts and Creativity

    Hauraki District Council Candidates’ stance on arts and creativity Name Q1 What is your favourite recent arts Q2 What do you think should be at the core of Q3 How do you think the council should invest in experience? the council’s arts strategy? the arts and arts infrastructure? Mayoral Candidates Toby Adams No response No response No response Josie Anderson The Erritja Gallery Exhibition hosted by Paeroa 1. Social inclusion - the weaving together of Working with communities, the art sector and Iwi: Society of Arts. An exclusive exhibition of people and communities by growing their 1. Build a collective vision (requires consultation Aboriginal art, the only exhibition of this work in participation in the arts. and active and ongoing engagement). Aotearoa NZ. 2. Review and refresh Council's arts and culture 2. Development of an authentic Hauraki identity action plan, testing its relevance, now and for Te Puna o Te Pito Mata (Thames High School that (a) recognizes and promotes the unique the future. Kapa Haka), winners of the 2018 Hauraki potential and point of difference the indigenous 3. Review and audit the extent of resource Cultural Festival, performed põwhiri and creative sector provides for the region, and (b) support to galleries and museums throughout the whakangahau to mark the visit of the Taiwan promotes and celebrates diverse arts and district, identifying gaps/challenges/ Tourism Bureau to Tirohia Marae as guests of cultural traditions within the district. inconsistencies and solutions for mitigation. Council. 4. Develop an overarching strategy that has 3. Enrichment of the lives of the district's people particular regard for tangata whenua through economic regeneration and social (ie.engagement), cultural diversity (ie.reflecting inclusion.
  • Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 2 June 2014

    Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 2 June 2014

    Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document JUNE 2014 INTERNAL DRAFT Information Document Reference Waikato Sports Facility Plan Authors Craig Jones, Gordon Cessford Sign off Version Internal Draft 4 Date 4th June 2014 Disclaimer: Information, data and general assumptions used in the compilation of this report have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Visitor Solutions Ltd has used this information in good faith and makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of this information. Interested parties should perform their own investigations, analysis and projections on all issues prior to acting in any way with regard to this project. Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 2 June 2014 Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 3 June 2014 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 Our challenges 8 3.0 Our Choices for Maintaining the network 9 4.0 Key Principles 10 5.0 Decision Criteria, Facility Evaluation & Funding 12 6.0 Indoor Court Facilities 16 7.0 Aquatic Facilities 28 8.0 Hockey – Artifical Turfs 38 9.0 Tennis Court Facilities 44 10.0 Netball – Outdoor Courts 55 11.0 Playing Fields 64 12.0 Athletics Tracks 83 13.0 Equestrian Facilities 90 14.0 Bike Facilities 97 15.0 Squash Court Facilities 104 16.0 Gymsport facilities 113 17.0 Rowing Facilities 120 18.0 Club Room Facilities 127 19.0 Bowling Green Facilities 145 20.0 Golf Club Facilities 155 21.0 Recommendations & Priority Actions 165 Appendix 1 - School Facility Survey 166 Waikato Sports Facility Plan Reference Document 4 June 2014 1.0 INTRODUCTION Plan Purpose The purpose of the Waikato Facility Plan is to provide a high level strategic framework for regional sports facilities planning.
  • Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration

    Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration

    Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs.
  • Covid-19 Pandemic

    Covid-19 Pandemic

    Hauraki District Council Recovery Plan 2020 SUMMARY our home, our future tō tātou rohe kāinga, tō tatou ao tūroa Executive Summary Communities globally, nationally and locally are feeling the significant effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. Locally, the effects of a drought have exacerbated this for the rural communities of the Hauraki District. This plan seeks to capture the actions undertaken and planned through the three stages of Respond, Recover, and Revitalise. It also provides context about the national and local settings for informing appropriate decision making for future actions. Overall Recovery Goal and Purpose of this Plan The overall goal for the Hauraki District is to minimise the consequences from the Drought and Covid-19 pandemic for the community. This includes the revitalisation of the community by addressing the social, economic, rural and built environmental effects of the drought and pandemic. The purpose of this Plan is to outline what actions were undertaken in the Respond phase and outline what still needs to be undertaken in the Recover and Revitalise phases to facilitate good planning and coordination of actions. This is a working document so will be updated as required. Recovery objectives include: a. minimising the escalation of the consequences of the emergency; and b. regeneration and enhancement of— (i) the social, psychological, economic, cultural, and physical wellbeing of individuals and communities; and (ii) the economic, built, and natural environments that support that wellbeing; and c. taking practicable opportunities to adapt to meet the future needs of the community; and d. reducing future exposure to hazards and their associated risks; and e.
  • Saving the Old Kopu Bridge

    Saving the Old Kopu Bridge

    Saving the Old Kopu Bridge Business Management Plan 2016 Thames Heritage Festival Open Day 13 March 2016. Sereena Burton photo A Bridge to the Future Promoting heritage protection, tourism and prosperity Local icon Cycleway link Tourism feature Transport history Engineering history International significance Presented by the Historic Kopu Bridge Society May 2016 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 4 2 Letters of Support ............................................................................................................... 5 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Purpose...................................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Why the Kopu Bridge matters to all of us ................................................................. 17 3.3 Never judge a book by its cover!............................................................................... 18 4 Old Kopu Bridge ................................................................................................................ 19 4.1 Historical Overview ................................................................................................... 19 4.2 Design ........................................................................................................................ 21 5 Future of the
  • Matamata-Piako District Detailed Population and Dwelling Projections to 2045

    Matamata-Piako District Detailed Population and Dwelling Projections to 2045

    Matamata-Piako District Detailed Population and Dwelling Projections to 2045 February 2015 Report prepared by: for: Matamata-Piako District Detailed Population and Dwelling Projections to 2045 Quality Assurance Statement Rationale Limited Project Director: Tom Lucas 5 Arrow Lane Project Manager: Walter Clarke PO Box 226 Arrowtown 9302 Prepared by: Walter Clarke New Zealand Approved for issue by: Tom Lucas Phone/Fax: +64 3 442 1156 Document Control G: \1 - Local Government\Thames_Coromandel\01 - Growth Study\2013\MPDC\Urban Analysis\MPDC Detailed Growth Projections to 2045_Final.docx Version Date Revision Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 23/12/14 Draft for Client JS WC WC 2 03/02/15 Final WC WC WC MATAMATA-PIAKO DISTRICT COUNCIL STATUS: FINAL 03 FEBRUARY 2015 REV 2 PAGE 2 Matamata-Piako District Detailed Population and Dwelling Projections to 2045 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Population ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Dwellings .................................................................................................................................... 6 3 Results ...............................................................................................................................................
  • Hauraki District Sport and Active Recreation Plan 2018-2028

    Hauraki District Sport and Active Recreation Plan 2018-2028

    Hauraki District Sport and Active Recreation Plan 2018-2028 Hauraki District Council PO Box 17, Paeroa 3640 1 William St, Paeroa, NZ Ph: 07 862 8609 or 0800 734 834 (within the District) Email: [email protected] Executive summary The Hauraki District Councils vision “Our home, our future” (Hauraki District Council, 2018) aims to provide leadership, good quality infrastructure, services, open communication and ensure the ensure the sustainable use and management of resources for the benefit of all who live in, work in and visit the Hauraki District. The sport and recreation sector is strong in Hauraki, where there is a long tradition of providing opportunities for community participation and competition in sport, recreation and physical activity. The District is home to excellent attractions including walkways, tracks and the Hauraki Rail Trail, encompassing an array of outstanding natural features and landscapes. In partnership Hauraki District Council and Sport Waikato support the provision of sport, recreation and physical activity opportunities for the community of the Hauraki District. Together both organisations recognise a need to deliver a coordinated, collaborative and clear plan to lead, enable and guide this provision. The Hauraki Sport and Active Recreation Plan 2018‐28 (The Plan) is designed to provide direction for future investment and focus for both organisations, prioritising opportunities for investment. The Plan has been prepared based on available data at the time of writing the report. Given the reliance on data from third parties, and a survey response rate from clubs of 63%, it is important to recognise that some data omissions will exist.
  • The New Zealand Gazette 781

    The New Zealand Gazette 781

    JUNE 28] THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE 781 MILITARY AREA No. 2 (PAEROA)-oontVlllUed MILITARY AREA No. 2 (PAEROA)-contVlllUed 652176 Clements, Ber.nard Leslie, farm hand, Kutarere, Bay of 647905 Grant, John Gordon, farm hand, c/o W. Grant, P.O., Plenty. Tauranga. 653820 Cochrane, John Gordon, farm hand, Kereone, Morrinsville. 649417 Green, Eric Raymond, farm hand, Matatoki, Thames. 650235 Collins, George Thomas, factory hand, Stanley Rd., Te Aroha. 648437 Griffin, Ivan Ray, farm hand, Richmond Downs, Walton. 651327 Collins, John Frederick, farm hand, c/o P. and T. O'Grady, 654935 Griffin, Robert William, farm hand, Rangiuru Rd., Te Puke. Omokoroa R.D., Tauranga. 649020 Guernier, Frederick Maurice Alfred, vulcanizer, Stanley Rd., 649338 Cooney, Douglas John, farm hand, c/o J. E. Martin, Te Aroha. Ngongotaha. 654323 Haigh, Athol Murry, farm hand, R.D., Gordon, Te Aroha. 654686 Cooper, Leslie John, Waikino. 650227 Hamilton, Anthony Graeme, farm hand, Te Poi R.D., 655006 Cooper, Sefton Aubrey, seaman, 160 Devonport Rd., Matamata. Tauranga. 647964 Hamilton, Donald Cameron, farmer, c/o N. Q. H. Howie, 650435 Corbett, Allen Dale, Totmans Rd., Okoroire, Tirau. Kiwitahi, Morrinsville. 648452 Costello, William Charles, timber-worker, Clayton Rd., 649782 Hammond, David St. George, farm hand, Wiltsdown R.D., Rotorua. No. 2, Putaruru. 653108 Cowley, James Frederick, farm hand, Shaftesbury, Te Aroha. 449888 Handley, Stuart Alley, farm hand, Mill Rd. 655008 Cox, Robert Earle, student, Pollen St., Thames. 650384 Hansen, Leo Noel, dairy factory employee, Hill St., 649340 Craig, Preston Bryce, farm hand, c/o Box 129, Opotiki. 653879 Harrison, Wilfrid Russell, tractor-driver, Hoe-o-Tainui R.D., 650243 Cranston, Blake, farm hand, c/o P.
  • Nov. 6.] the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. 2881

    Nov. 6.] the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. 2881

    Nov. 6.] THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. 2881 170647 Clothier, Thomas Malcolm, Farm Hand, Burwood Rd, 373333 Cowan, Percival, Dairy-farmer, Awakeri Post-office, Bay of Matamata. Plenty. 307840 Clotworthy, James Wilson, Chemist, care of R. W. Hamlyn, 295428 Cox, John Derrick, Share-milker, Lichfield Rural Delivery, Omaio, via Opotiki. Putaruru. 261696 Clulow, James Harold, Farmer, Tauhei Rural Delivery, 031659 Craddock, Ross Stratton, Farm Labourer, care of Mr. F. Morrinsville. Craddock, Rural Delivery, Whakatane. 390914 Clune, James Alfred, Sawmill Hand, Tunnicliffe Mill, 398725 Craig, Raymond Thomas, Grocer, care of Kaituna Hotel, Rural Delivery, Te Puke. Te Puke. 268598 Coates, James Muir, Air-compressor Attendant, care of Mrs. 248316 Crampton, Maurice John, Farm Hand, care of Mr. T. M. Tilson, Tutanekai St, Rotorua. Smith, Kiwitahi Rural Delivery, Morrinsville. 276762 Cobb, James Henry Aloysius, Bowser Attendant, Broadway, 272302 Orang, Edward James, Farmer, Edgecombe, Bay of Plenty. Matamata. 405183 Crawford, John Anzac, Dragline-driver, Katikati, Bay of 398800 Cochrane, James Nicoll, Dairy-farmer, P.O. Box 19, Waikino. Plenty. 264567 Cocks, John Alexander, Student, Orongo, Turua. 424132 Creighton, Robert Jeremiah, Farm Employee, Peria Rd, 313130 Coffin, Edward, Farmer, Rural Delivery, Matata. Matamata. 104249 Coffin, Stanley Lionel, Farmer, Te Puke. 430413 Cropp, Wilfred Lester, Farm-manager, Waitakaruru Rural 286017 Coker, Andrew Norman, Grocer, 13 Selwyn St, Tauranga. Delivery. 277110 Coldicutt, Albert Gordon, Farm employee, Netherton. 002607 Crosbie, Clement John, Student, Rural Delivery, Paeroa. 291188 Coldicutt, Stuart Birdwood, Truck-driver, Netherton. 426198 Crosby, Darby, Cream-grad.er, care of Mrs. Watkins, Canada 003540 Cole, Anthony George, Registered Masseur, Government St, Morrinsville. Sanatorium, Rotorua. 131125 Cross, Colin Thomas, Radio-serviceman, 19 1st A venue, 427070 Coleman, Terence Athol, Farm Labourer, care of P.
  • Notes Subscription Agreement)

    Notes Subscription Agreement)

    Amendment and Restatement Deed (Notes Subscription Agreement) PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited Issuer The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 Subscribers 3815658 v5 DEED dated 2020 PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited ("Issuer") The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 ("Subscribers" and each a "Subscriber") INTRODUCTION The parties wish to amend and restate the Notes Subscription Agreement as set out in this deed. COVENANTS 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions: In this deed: "Notes Subscription Agreement" means the notes subscription agreement dated 7 December 2011 (as amended and restated on 4 June 2015) between the Issuer and the Subscribers. "Effective Date" means the date notified by the Issuer as the Effective Date in accordance with clause 2.1. 1.2 Notes Subscription Agreement definitions: Words and expressions defined in the Notes Subscription Agreement (as amended by this deed) have, except to the extent the context requires otherwise, the same meaning in this deed. 1.3 Miscellaneous: (a) Headings are inserted for convenience only and do not affect interpretation of this deed. (b) References to a person include that person's successors, permitted assigns, executors and administrators (as applicable). (c) Unless the context otherwise requires, the singular includes the plural and vice versa and words denoting individuals include other persons and vice versa. (d) A reference to any legislation includes any statutory regulations, rules, orders or instruments made or issued pursuant to that legislation and any amendment to, re- enactment of, or replacement of, that legislation. (e) A reference to any document includes reference to that document as amended, modified, novated, supplemented, varied or replaced from time to time.
  • Fifty Years of Primitive Methodism in New Zealand Page 1

    Fifty Years of Primitive Methodism in New Zealand Page 1

    Fifty Years of Primitive Methodism in New Zealand Page 1 Fifty Years of Primitive Methodism in New Zealand FIFTY YEARS Of Primitive Methodism in New Zealand. CONTENTS. PREFACE PART I.—INTRODUCTION. CHAPTER I.—NEW ZEALAND. 1. DISCOVERY 2. PIONEERS 3. THE MAORIS 4. MISSION WORK 5. SETTLEMENT CHAPTER II.—PRIMITIVE METHODISM. 1. ORIGIN 2. GROWTH AND DIFFICULTIES 3. CHURCH POLITY AND DOCTRINES PART II.—PRIMITIVE METHODISM IN NEW ZEALAND. CHAPTER I.—TARANAKI 1. NEW PLYMOUTH STATION 2. STRATFORD MISSION CHAPTER II.—WELLINGTON 1. WELLINGTON STATION 2. MANAWATU STATION 3. FOXTON STATION 4. HALCOMBE STATION 5. HUNTERVILLE MISSION CHAPTER III—AUCKLAND 1. AUCKLAND STATION 2. AUCKLAND II. STATION 3. THAMES STATION CHAPTER IV.—CANTERBURY 1. CHRISTCHURCH STATION Page 2 Fifty Years of Primitive Methodism in New Zealand 2. TIMARU STATION 3. ASHBURTON STATION 4. GREENDALE STATION 5. GERALDINE STATION 6. WAIMATE AND OAMARU MISSION CHAPTER V.—OTAGO 1. DUNEDIN STATION 2. INVERCARGILL STATION 3. SOUTH INVERCARGILL MISSION 4. BLUFF BRANCH CHAPTER VI—NELSON 1. WESTPORT AND DENNISTON MISSION CHAPTER VII.—GENERAL EPITOME. 1. CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY 2. SUMMARY ILLUSTRATIONS. REV. ROBERT WARD MAORIDOM GROUP OF MINISTERS AND LAYMEN DEVON STREET, NEW PLYMOUTH MOUNT EGMONT WELLINGTON GROUP OF MINISTERS QUEEN STREET, AUCKLAND FRANKLIN ROAD CHURCH, AUCKLAND CHRISTCHURCH CAMBRIDGE TERRACE CHURCH, CHRISTCHURCH GROUP OF LAYMEN DUNEDIN DON STREET CHURCH, INVERCARGILL Page 3 Fifty Years of Primitive Methodism in New Zealand PREFACE This book owes its existence to a desire to perpetuate the memory of those pioneer ministers and laymen who founded the Primitive Methodist Connexion in different parts of this Colony. The Conference of 1893 showed its approval of the desire by authorising the publication of a Memorial Volume in connection with our Jubilee Celebrations.
  • Environmental Pest Plants

    Environmental Pest Plants

    4.8.3 Indigenous forest on the range and plateaus The Kaimai forests were included in the National Forest Survey (NFS) of indigenous timber resources of 1946-55. The southern half of the ranges was systematically sampled in 1946-48 and the northern half sampled less intensively in 1951-52. These data were used for the compilation of forest type maps (Dale and James 1977). The northern ranges were further sampled by the Ecological Forest Survey in 1965-66, to provide data for more detailed ecological typing. Descriptions of vegetation composition and pattern on the range and plateaus are provided by Dale and James (1977), Clarkson (2002), and Burns and Smale (2002). Other vegetation maps are provided by Nicholls (1965, 1966a&b, 1967a&b, 1971a&b, 1974a, 1975). Further descriptive accounts are provided by Nicholls (1968, 1969, 1972, 1976a&b, 1978, 1983a-c, 1984, 1985a&b, 2002). Beadel (2006) provides a comprehensive overview of vegetation in the Otanewainuku Ecological District and also provides vegetation descriptions and vegetation type maps for privately-owned natural areas within the tract, such as at Te Waraiti and the Whaiti Kuranui Block. Humphreys and Tyler (1990) provide similar information for the Te Aroha Ecological District. A broad representation of indigenous forest pattern is provided in Figure 9. Tawa and kamahi (Weinmannia racemosa) with scattered emergent rimu and northern rata dominates forests on the Mamaku Plateau (Nicholls 1966, Smale et al. 1997). Rimu increases in abundance southwards across the plateau, as the contribution of coarse rhyolitic tephra to soils increased (Smale et al. 1997). Beeches (Nothofagus spp.) (beeches) are present locally on the plateau (Nicholls 1966).