Significant Breeding Event of Regent Honeyeaters Anthochaera Phrygia Near Kurri Kurri, New South Wales, During Spring 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Significant Breeding Event of Regent Honeyeaters Anthochaera Phrygia Near Kurri Kurri, New South Wales, During Spring 2007 Australian Field Ornithology 2014, 31, 113–121 Significant breeding event of Regent Honeyeaters Anthochaera phrygia near Kurri Kurri, New South Wales, during spring 2007 Michael Roderick1, David J. Geering2 and Dean A. Ingwersen1* 1BirdLife Australia, Suite 2–05, 60 Leicester Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia 2New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage, P.O. Box 2111, Dubbo NSW 2830, Australia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Summary. During the spring–summer of 2007–2008, a breeding event of Regent Honeyeaters Anthochaera phrygia took place in bushland south of Kurri Kurri, in the dry open Spotted Gum–Ironbark forests of the Lower Hunter Valley in New South Wales. Breeding spanned at least 4 months, and likely involved multiple clutches raised by several pairs. This event is considered to be highly significant in light of the continued decline of this critically endangered species, and the Lower Hunter Valley needs to be recognised as one of the most important regions for the species. Introduction The Regent Honeyeater Anthochaera phrygia is an endangered species that occurs in open forests and woodlands from south-eastern Queensland to central Victoria (Franklin et al. 1989), although records near the limits of its range have been scarce in recent decades and New South Wales (NSW) now forms the stronghold for the species (Ingwersen et al. in prep). It is listed as Critically Endangered within NSW, Endangered at a national level, and was upgraded from Endangered to Critically Endangered in the Action Plan for Australian Birds 2010 (Garnett et al. 2011). The total population of Regent Honeyeaters is probably fewer than 1000 birds (see Garnett et al. 2011). A review of recent data suggests that it may be significantly lower than this, possibly as low as 350–400 individuals (Debus 2008; Regent Honeyeater Recovery Team unpublished data). Regent Honeyeaters are known to breed as single pairs and in loose colonies. Breeding colonies have mostly been found at a few key sites, notably the Capertee Valley and the Bundarra–Barraba region (Geering & French 1998; Oliver et al. 1998). Regent Honeyeaters occur regularly within the Hunter Valley (e.g. Franklin et al. 1989; Stuart 1994–2013; Roderick & Ingwersen 2012), and in the early 1900s were in thousands at some locations (White 1909). As a result, the area has been recognised as an important supplementary or subsidiary foraging area for Regent Honeyeaters that regularly utilise the Capertee Valley (Geering & Mason 2009; Ingwersen et al. in prep). The species also occurs in areas proximate to the Hunter Valley, particularly around Lake Macquarie and the NSW Central Coast, most often in association with the flowering of Swamp Mahogany Eucalyptus robusta trees (Stuart 1994–2013; Roderick et al. 2013). 114 Australian Field Ornithology M. Roderick et al. The Hunter Valley is a broad valley that supports a range of habitats that are preferred by Regent Honeyeaters. In the Upper Hunter Valley, these include vegetation communities containing White Box Eucalyptus albens, Yellow Box E. melliodora and Mugga Ironbark E. sideroxylon. These habitats facilitate movement from the core breeding area (Capertee Valley) to important winter nectar sources in coastal and sub-coastal areas. In the Lower Hunter Valley (parts of the valley coastward of about Jerrys Plains), Regent Honeyeaters predominantly occur in dry open forests in association with the seasonal blossoming of winter- flowering eucalypts and, in particular, Spotted Gum Corymbia maculata. Regent Honeyeaters appear to be present in the Lower Hunter and nearby coastal areas in greatest numbers in autumn and winter (generally May to August), which is directly correlated with the predominant flowering period of eucalypts, such as Spotted Gum and Swamp Mahogany (Roderick & Ingwersen 2012; Regent Honeyeater Recovery Team unpublished data). However, some birds may persist in the area beyond this period if spring-flowering eucalypts such as Broad-leaved Ironbark E. fibrosa,Brown Stringybark E. capitellata, an undescribed stringybark E. sp. aff. agglomerata, Grey Gum E. punctata, Forest Red Gum E. tereticornis or mistletoes (in particular Long-flowered Mistletoe Dendrophthoe vitellina) are in blossom. It is when this occurs that Regent Honeyeaters may breed in the Lower Hunter Valley. Here we describe a Regent Honeyeater breeding event in 2007–2008 that was the most significant recorded in the Lower Hunter Valley, and coincided with few records (of only nine individuals) and no breeding in the Capertee Valley over the same period (Regent Honeyeater Recovery Team unpublished data). Since 2000, Honeyeaters have been recorded nesting on only three additional occasions in the Lower Hunter Valley at a private property near Quorrobolong—two nests were found in 2000, a single nest was found in 2003, and a third nesting attempt was recorded at this site in 2007. However, it should be noted that no fledged young were observed at the Quorrobolong property. Regent Honeyeaters in the Lower Hunter Valley in 2007 In the Lower Hunter–Lake Macquarie area in 2007, Regent Honeyeaters were initially found in the forests dominated by Swamp Mahogany around Lake Macquarie in late autumn. Six Regent Honeyeaters were first recorded at Morisset Hospital Reserve on 12 May 2007, increasing to approximately 50 birds by 28 May 2007 (the last record at this site for the year: Stuart 2008). Regent Honeyeaters were also recorded at Galgabba Point (south of Swansea) in early May (Stuart 2008) (Figure 1). On 4 August 2007, the first Regent Honeyeaters were recorded in the Lower Hunter Valley woodlands, when three were found at the private property near Quorrobolong referred to previously (~15 km south of the area where the major breeding event described opposite took place). Subsequent counts on that property rose to an estimated 20 Honeyeaters by later that month (Stuart 2008). A pair was observed nesting on 20 August, and by 13 September there were three pairs nesting at the site (A. Morris pers. comm.). Nesting continued through September Regent Honeyeaters breeding in Lower Hunter Valley, NSW 115 Figure 1. Locations of Regent Honeyeater sightings in the Lower Hunter Valley, NSW, May 2007–January 2008. and October, though no fledged young were observed. On 27 August, two Honeyeaters were recorded on a property south of Ellalong, ~5 km west of the Quorrobolong site (Figure 1). At approximately the same time that Regent Honeyeaters were nesting at Quorrobolong, two Honeyeaters were recorded in the bushland within a 870-ha area that has been zoned for industrial subdivision known as the Hunter Economic Zone (HEZ; Figure 2) near Kurri Kurri Hospital on 30 August (Stuart 2008). Two Honeyeaters were also seen ~500 m to the north on 25 October, feeding on the blossom of Long-flowered Mistletoe in Narrow-leaved Apples Angophora bakeri (M. Roderick & S. Roderick pers. obs.). Chronology of the 2007 breeding event Multiple Regent Honeyeaters were first noted by a local birdwatcher (A. Zoneff) on 28 October 2007 within the HEZ, ~1.5 km west of the August and other October observations for the HEZ. Amongst an undetermined number of adults (see front cover), he counted six juvenile birds, readily identifiable by their brown plumage (A. Zoneff pers. comm.). Over the next 2 days, two pairs of Honeyeaters were observed constructing nests in this area, along with an active nest where an adult was sitting on eggs (Figure 3; A. Zoneff pers. comm.). Soon after (in early November), a pair of adults was attending a recently built nest in bushland south 116 Australian Field Ornithology M. Roderick et al. Figure 2. Locations of Regent Honeyeaters and nests in the Hunter Economic Zone (HEZ), August 2007–January 2008. Figure 3. Regent Honeyeater on nest during the 2007–2008 breeding event near Kurri Kurri, NSW. Photo: Andrew Zoneff Regent Honeyeaters breeding in Lower Hunter Valley, NSW 117 of Mulbring Street, Kurri Kurri, ~2.8 km east of this nesting activity; no evidence of eggs or dependent young could be found at this site. On 17 November 2007, a group of Regent Honeyeaters was observed just to the south of a large power easement at the base of Mt Tomalpin (32°50′34″S, 151°26′35″E), ~2 km south of the concentration of nests just described. This flock contained at least seven juveniles, and a nest with an adult sitting on eggs was found. On the same day, an inactive nest was located ~170 m north of the active nest (A. Zoneff pers. comm.). The Regent Honeyeater Recovery Co-ordinator (D. Geering) was advised of these sightings and visited the area with the initial observer to record nesting activity on 28–29 November 2007. Fieldwork during these 2 days was carried out predominantly in an area of high Regent Honeyeater activity, spread across an area of forest near where the original nests had been found in late October (all within 1 km of 32°49′38″S, 151°26′25″E). Five active nests were found, along with dependent fledged young and individual adults. A single active nest was also located to the south of the power easement, where the active nest and inactive nest had been found 12 days earlier. The birds were utilising nectar flows of Broad- leaved Ironbark, a species not previously known to support breeding Regent Honeyeaters (D. Geering pers. obs.). The breeding stage of Regent Honeyeaters associated with the active nests— namely recently fledged young, large nestlings, and adults incubating eggs— indicated that this particular breeding event had been taking place for at least a month before the birds were located during November. The juvenile plumage of the recently fledged birds indicated an approximate age of less than 6 weeks (Geering 2010). These birds may have been the offspring of previous breeding within the HEZ, possibly as early as September, or had moved from a nearby area, such as Quorrobolong.
Recommended publications
  • Kooragang Wetlands: Retrospective of an Integrated Ecological Restoration Project in the Hunter River Estuary
    KOORAGANG WETLANDS: RETROSPECTIVE OF AN INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION PROJECT IN THE HUNTER RIVER ESTUARY P Svoboda Hunter Local Land Services, Paterson NSW Introduction: At first glance, the Hunter River estuary near Newcastle NSW is a land of contradictions. It is home to one of the world’s largest coal ports and a large industrial complex as well as being the location of a large internationally significant wetland. The remarkable natural productivity of the Hunter estuary at the time of European settlement is well documented. Also well documented are the degradation and loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat in the estuary due to over 200 years of draining, filling, dredging and clearing (Williams et al., 2000). However, in spite of extensive modification, natural systems of the estuary retained enough value and function for large areas to be transformed by restoration activities that aimed to show industry and environmental conservation could work together to their mutual benefit. By establishing partnerships and taking a collaborative and adaptive approach, the project was able to implement restoration and related activities on a landscape basis, working across land ownership and management boundaries (Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project, 2010). The Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project (KWRP) was launched in 1993 to help compensate for the loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat at suitable sites in the Hunter estuary. This paper revisits the expectations and planning for the project as presented in a paper to the INTECOL’s V international wetlands conference in 1996 (Svoboda and Copeland, 1998), reviews the project’s activities, describes outcomes and summarises issues faced and lessons learnt during 24 years of implementing a large, long-term, integrated, adaptive and community-assisted ecological restoration project.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] Re: Sale of Ellalong Lagoon
    The Hon. Matt Kean MP 52 Martin Place SYDNEY NSW 2000 Email to: [email protected] Re: Sale of Ellalong Lagoon and adjacent forest Dear Minister Kean, Hunter Bird Observers Club is calling on the NSW Government and the National Parks and Wildlife Service to prioritise acquisition of the property at 39 Congewai Road, Congewai in the Lower Hunter Valley for the benefit of our unique biodiversity, threatened species and the local community. This 406-hectare property includes Ellalong Lagoon which is listed on the Directory of Important Wetlands of Australia and is one of the best-known wetlands in the Hunter Region. The property also includes a forest of approximately 200 ha with a continuous canopy and completely intact lower strata. It is also unfragmented; a rarity on the floor of the Hunter Valley where most woodland has been cleared. According to T. Peake 2006: “76% of woodland and forest from the Hunter Valley floor have been cleared leaving only 19% of fragmented remnant vegetation. A mere 0.8% of this remnant vegetation is in protected ownership - national parks, which are situated on poorer soils and have lower bird abundance and diversity.” The BirdLife Australia atlas database (Birdata) lists 189 species as having been recorded on this parcel of land, approximately 31% of species in NSW. The forested land is vital habitat for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater and Swift Parrot both of which are in imminent danger of becoming extinct. The conservation of parcels such as this is crucial for the ongoing survival of threatened species, including those captive-bred Regent Honeyeaters which you helped release back in June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Valley: Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission 8 November 2013
    Director Assessment Policy, Systems & Stakeholder Engagement Department of Planning and Infrastructure Hunter Valley: Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission 8 November 2013 Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission: Hunter Valley This page was intentionally left blank 2 Coal Seam Gas Exclusion Zones Submission: Hunter Valley Foreword Closing the loop on CSG Mining in the Hunter Valley When it comes to coal seam gas (CSG) mining, protecting Australia’s most visited wine tourism region in its entirety - not in parts - is of paramount importance. And the time to do it is now. The NSW State Government should be recognised for delivering on its pre-election promises to preserve the Hunter Valley wine tourism region from CSG mining by confirming exclusion zones around the villages of Broke and Bulga as well as around significant areas defined as Viticulture Critical Industry Clusters (VCIC). But protecting most of the region, while leaving several critical areas open for CSG exploration and mining, could have devastating consequences for the iconic Hunter region as a whole – and undo the Government’s efforts thus far. While mining is obviously a legitimate land use and an important revenue source, this can’t justify allowing mining activities in areas where other existing, profitable industries would be adversely affected. Put simply, winemaking, tourism and CSG mining are not compatible land uses. The popularity and reputation of the Hunter Valley wine tourism region is fundamentally connected to the area’s natural beauty and landscape – and that natural beauty will fast disappear if the countryside is peppered with unsightly gas wells. Research reveals 80%1 of Hunter Valley visitors don’t want to see gas wells in the wine and tourism region, with 70%2 saying if gas wells are established they’ll just stop coming.
    [Show full text]
  • A Growth Agenda for the Hunter Drivers of Population Growth
    A growth agenda for the Hunter Drivers of population growth A report prepared for the Hunter Joint Organisation of Councils Dr Kim Johnstone, Associate Director Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Greater Newcastle and the Hunter region ........................................................................................... 2 Drivers of population change ........................................................................................................... 3 Population growth ............................................................................................................................ 3 Age profile ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Drivers of growth .............................................................................................................................. 6 Understanding migration.................................................................................................................. 8 Internal migration ............................................................................................................................. 8 Overseas migration .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific National Greta Provisioning Facility Biodiversity Offset Package
    Pacific National Greta Provisioning Facility Biodiversity Offset Package January 2013 Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................ 1 2. Introduction ............................................................................. 3 2.1 Overview ........................................................................................ 3 2.2 Objectives ...................................................................................... 4 2.3 Relationship with Existing Reports .................................................. 6 2.4 Site Context .................................................................................... 6 2.5 BioBanking ................................................................................... 10 2.6 Glossary of Terms ........................................................................ 11 3. Methodology ......................................................................... 14 3.1 Desktop Assessment .................................................................... 14 3.2 BioBanking Assessment and Credit Calculation ............................ 14 3.3 Potential Offset Property Comparison ........................................... 15 3.4 Site Survey ................................................................................... 16 3.5 Staff Qualifications ........................................................................ 17 4. Existing Environment ............................................................ 21 4.1 Development Area .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for the Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera Phrygia)
    National Recovery Plan for the Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia) April 2016 1 The Species Profile and Threats Database pages linked to this recovery plan is obtainable from: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2016. The National Recovery Plan for the Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia) is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This report should be attributed as ‘National Recovery Plan for the Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia), Commonwealth of Australia 2016’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Image credits Front Cover: Regent honeyeaters in the Capertee Valley, NSW. (© Copyright, Dean Ingwersen). 2
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Investment Prospectus 2016 the Hunter Region, Nsw Invest in Australia’S Largest Regional Economy
    HUNTER INVESTMENT PROSPECTUS 2016 THE HUNTER REGION, NSW INVEST IN AUSTRALIA’S LARGEST REGIONAL ECONOMY Australia’s largest Regional economy - $38.5 billion Connected internationally - airport, seaport, national motorways,rail Skilled and flexible workforce Enviable lifestyle Contact: RDA Hunter Suite 3, 24 Beaumont Street, Hamilton NSW 2303 Phone: +61 2 4940 8355 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rdahunter.org.au AN INITIATIVE OF FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT WELCOMES CONTENTS Federal and State Government Welcomes 4 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Australia’s future depends on the strength of our regions and their ability to Introducing the Hunter progress as centres of productivity and innovation, and as vibrant places to live. 7 History and strengths The Hunter Region has great natural endowments, and a community that has shown great skill and adaptability in overcoming challenges, and in reinventing and Economic Strength and Diversification diversifying its economy. RDA Hunter has made a great contribution to these efforts, and 12 the 2016 Hunter Investment Prospectus continues this fine work. The workforce, major industries and services The prospectus sets out a clear blueprint of the Hunter’s future direction as a place to invest, do business, and to live. Infrastructure and Development 42 Major projects, transport, port, airports, utilities, industrial areas and commercial develpoment I commend RDA Hunter for a further excellent contribution to the progress of its region. Education & Training 70 The Hon Warren Truss MP Covering the extensive services available in the Hunter Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure and Regional Development Innovation and Creativity 74 How the Hunter is growing it’s reputation as a centre of innovation and creativity Living in the Hunter 79 STATE GOVERNMENT Community and lifestyle in the Hunter The Hunter is the biggest contributor to the NSW economy outside of Sydney and a jewel in NSW’s rich Business Organisations regional crown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnini) and the Mockingbirds (Sturnidae: Mimini)
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE STARLINGS (STURNIDAE: STURNINI) AND THE MOCKINGBIRDS (STURNIDAE: MIMINI) CHARLESG. SIBLEYAND JON E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--OldWorld starlingshave been thought to be related to crowsand their allies, to weaverbirds, or to New World troupials. New World mockingbirdsand thrashershave usually been placed near the thrushesand/or wrens. DNA-DNA hybridization data indi- cated that starlingsand mockingbirdsare more closelyrelated to each other than either is to any other living taxon. Some avian systematistsdoubted this conclusion.Therefore, a more extensiveDNA hybridizationstudy was conducted,and a successfulsearch was made for other evidence of the relationshipbetween starlingsand mockingbirds.The resultssup- port our original conclusionthat the two groupsdiverged from a commonancestor in the late Oligoceneor early Miocene, about 23-28 million yearsago, and that their relationship may be expressedin our passerineclassification, based on DNA comparisons,by placing them as sistertribes in the Family Sturnidae,Superfamily Turdoidea, Parvorder Muscicapae, Suborder Passeres.Their next nearest relatives are the members of the Turdidae, including the typical thrushes,erithacine chats,and muscicapineflycatchers. Received 15 March 1983, acceptedI November1983. STARLINGS are confined to the Old World, dine thrushesinclude Turdus,Catharus, Hylocich- mockingbirdsand thrashersto the New World. la, Zootheraand Myadestes.d) Cinclusis
    [Show full text]
  • Vines, Wine & Identity
    Vines, Wine & Identity Project partners newsletter Issue 4 | December 2015 | Faculty of Education and Arts Welcome It has been a challenging end to 2015 for grape project, Pauline has provided access to the Journal growers in Pokolbin with hail in mid-December of the Hungerford & Associated Families Society, destroying as much as a third of this year’s crop published since 1999, which contains material on in some vineyards. With this in mind, in addition to Pokolbin wine families from the colonial era. This warm greetings for the festive season, the project complements research by Jack Sullivan of the team extends wishes for ideal weather conditions Paterson Historical Society on colonial wine families for the remainder of the growth season across the in that district. Hunter region. Jim Fitz-Gerald from Kelman Estate has also As the calendar year draws to a close, the Vines, been instrumental in locating colonial Hunter wine Wine & Identity project has matured well, as sites such as Kirkton, the property of William and explained here. Catherine Kelman. The image below is the grave site of Kelman and Busby family members. Follow project research and join the conversation on Twitter at #VinesWineIdentity. FAMILY HISTORY Academic historians increasingly recognise the role played by family historians in providing intelligence about people and places in Australia. In her recent book Fractured Families: Life on the margins in colonial New South Wales (UNSW Press, 2015), Tanya Evans paid tribute to the tireless searching and documenting of family lives undertaken by descendants of colonial Australians. For Vines, Wine & Identity, work by Pauline Tyrrell is invaluable.
    [Show full text]
  • Regent Honeyeater Identification Guide
    REGENT HONEYEATER IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Broad patch of bare warty Males call prominently, skin around the eye, which whereas females only is smaller in young birds occasionally make soft calls. and females. Best seen at close range or with binoculars. Plumage around the head Regent Honeyeaters are and neck is solid black 20-24 cm long, with females giving a slightly hooded smaller and having duller appearance. plumage than the males. Distinctive scalloped (not streaked) breast. Broad stripes of yellow in the wing when folded, and very prominent in flight. From below the tail is a bright yellow. From behind it’s black bordered by bright yellow feathers. COMMON MISIDENTIFICATIONS YELLOW-TUFTED HONEYEATER NEW HOLLAND HONEYEATER WHITE-CHEEKED HONEYEATER Lichenostomus melanops Phylidonyris novaehollandiae Phylidonyris niger Habitat: Box-Gum-Ironbark Habitat: Woodland with heathy Habitat: Heathlands, parks and woodlands and forest with a understorey, gardens and gardens, less commonly open shrubby understorey. parklands. woodland. Notes: Common, sedentary bird Notes: Often misidentified as a Notes: Similar to New Holland of temperate woodlands. Has a Regent Honeyeater; commonly Honeyeaters, but have a large distinctive yellow crown and ear seen in urban parks and gardens. patch of white feathers in their tuft in a black face, with a bright Distinctive white breast with black cheek and a dark eye (no white yellow throat. Underparts are streaks, several patches of white eye ring). Also have white breast plain dirty yellow, upperparts around the face, and a white eye streaked black. olive-green. ring. Tend to be in small, noisy and aggressive flocks. PAINTED HONEYEATER CRESCENT HONEYEATER Grantiella picta Phylidonyris pyrrhopterus Habitat: Box-Ironbark woodland, Habitat: Wetter habitats like particularly with fruiting mistletoe forest, dense woodland and Notes: A seasonal migrant, only coastal heathlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Bird Surveys in the Gloucester Tops
    Gloucester Tops bird surveys The Whistler 13 (2019): 26-34 Spring bird surveys in the Gloucester Tops Alan Stuart1 and Mike Newman2 181 Queens Road, New Lambton, NSW 2305, Australia [email protected] 272 Axiom Way, Acton Park, Tasmania 7021, Australia [email protected] Received 14 March 2019; accepted 11 May 2019; published on-line 15 July 2019 Spring surveys between 2010 and 2017 in the Gloucester Tops in New South Wales recorded 92 bird species. The bird assemblages in three altitude zones were characterised and the Reporting Rates for individual species were compared. Five species (Rufous Scrub-bird Atrichornis rufescens, Red-browed Treecreeper Climacteris erythrops, Crescent Honeyeater Phylidonyris pyrrhopterus, Olive Whistler Pachycephala olivacea and Flame Robin Petroica phoenicea) were more likely to be recorded at high altitude. The Sulphur-crested Cockatoo Cacatua galerita, Brown Cuckoo-Dove Macropygia phasianella and Wonga Pigeon Leucosarcia melanoleuca were less likely to be recorded at high altitude. All these differences were statistically significant. Two species, Paradise Riflebird Lophorina paradiseus and Bell Miner Manorina melanophrys, were more likely to be recorded at mid-altitude than at high altitude, and had no low-altitude records. The differences were statistically significant. Many of the 78 species found at low altitude were infrequently or never recorded at higher altitudes and for 18 species, the differences warrant further investigation. There was only one record of the Regent Bowerbird Sericulus chrysocephalus and evidence is provided that this species may have become uncommon in the area. The populations of Green Catbird Ailuroedus crassirostris, Australian Logrunner Orthonyx temminckii and Pale-yellow Robin Tregellasia capito may also have declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Wetlands National Park Plan of Management
    NSW NATIONAL PARKS & WILDLIFE SERVICE Hunter Wetlands National Park Plan of Management environment.nsw.gov.au © 2020 State of NSW and Department of Planning, Industry and Environment With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Department of Planning, Industry and Environment are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. DPIE shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by DPIE and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. DPIE asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 2020. Cover photo: Hunter Wetlands National Park. D Benson/DPIE This plan of management was adopted by the Minister for Energy and Environment on 23 March 2020.
    [Show full text]