DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond Incredible: the Paralympic Road to Rio – an Ethnographic Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEYOND INCREDIBLE: THE PARALYMPIC ROAD TO RIO – AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY A PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE TEXAS WOMAN’S UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES BY SHERI WALTERS, D.P.T., M.S. DENTON, TX AUGUST 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Sheri Walters DEDICATION To all my athletes, patients, clients, instructors, peers, and family who have taught me so many lessons, I am personally and professionally grateful. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to gratefully acknowledge the many individuals who have contributed to this dissertation. I would like to thank my committee chair Dr. Mary Thompson for assigning a journal article that stimulated the idea for this topic. I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Kelli Brizzolara, Dr. Chad Swank, and Dr. Kerri Morgan, for their assistance and support. I am also grateful for the assistance of four entry-level physical therapy students at Texas Woman’s University, Ashley Brandish, Somer Meyers, Paige McMillian, and Mariana Rong who provided assistance with capturing and coding the social media data for this study. I am also very thankful for Cathy Sellers, the U.S. Paralympic Track and Field High Performance Director for approving this project and my access to the team. Erica Wheeler and Teresa Skinner, two coaches for the team, were also instrumental in helping me to get started and for encouraging me to push through. And obviously, this project would never have happened without the support of the team itself. I am thankful for their willingness to trust me with their stories. It is my sincere hope that this project with serve as a catalyst for continued growth of the Paralympic movement. iii ABSTRACT SHERI WALTERS BEYOND INCREDIBLE: THE PARALYMPIC ROAD TO RIO – AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY AUGUST 2018 The primary purpose of this ethnographic study was to understand the culture of the U.S. Paralympic Track and Field team from the 2015 World Championships through the 2016 Rio Paralympic Games. Secondary purposes included examination of the influence of sport in the lives of those involved in elite adaptive sport, greater examination of barriers and facilitators to participation for those involved in elite sport, issues related to and relevant to healthcare providers and coaches, and the psychosocial effects of the International Paralympic Committee Classification System within Paralympic track and field. Subjects were observed and select participants interviewed after being identified through purposeful snowball sampling. Observation notes, transcribed semi-structured interviews, social media posts, and media coverage were analyzed using theoretical frameworks to guide analyses. Feminist theory guided the ethnographic data analysis related to sport socialization. Self-determination theory was used to analyze the data relevant to healthcare providers and coaches in two separate phenomenological studies. Morgan’s practice community was used to theoretically frame the phenomenological iv study of classification. Rigor was established through triangulation, member checking, peer debriefing, and maintenance of a clear audit trail. Through data analysis, common themes related to the power of sport included a variety of health benefits, and increased participation in society. Barriers to participation included lack of awareness, cost, comorbidities, classification, and “doping.” Facilitators included family, sponsorships, others involved in sport, and fun. Negative aspects included injuries, illnesses, and transportation issues. Prominent negative aspects require staff to assist in managing those negative consequences, to educate athletes of the potential risk, and to allow athlete autonomy. Common themes that emerged related to socialization into and via sport included aspects related to shared training environments, traveling experiences, humor, and integration into able-bodied training environments and events. The athletes used sport and humor as a form of resistance against disablism, leading to a sense of empowerment. Themes related to the role of healthcare providers included the introduction of patients to sport, athletes’ perceptions of their healthcare providers as facilitator or barrier, and the roles of a healthcare provider. Providers could play a variety of roles, including serving as a researcher, coach, classifier, or working with athletes as a team medical provider. Providers reported experiences within the Paralympic movement that were personally and professionally rewarding. Prominent themes related to coaching included coaching philosophy, development, and challenges. Another theme was the influence of working with this v population in the coaches’ lives. Paralympic coaches appear to have adopted an autonomy-supportive-style of coaching, thus empowering their athletes. Coaches report difficulty finding quality adaptive sport coaching education and resources, relying on peer mentorship as a primary mode of gaining knowledge and experience. Adaptive sport athletes often have difficulty finding a program or coach, prompting discussion of integrating athletes with disabilities into able-bodied training groups. Coaches find rewards and meaning in their athletes and their work experiences with this population. Classification issues involving ambulatory sprinters and wheelchair racers produced themes related to psychosocial and potential ethical issues, leading to suggestions for improvement. Lack of transparency and inconsistencies by Paralympic officials and classifiers led to mistrust of the classification system. Potential opportunities for improvement include increased athlete involvement, transparent communication of factors involved in policy decisions, and examination of specific impairments and performance enhancing technology. This qualitative study gave a voice to a population that previously had been rarely heard. In giving these participants the opportunity to tell their story, the participants likely felt empowered in being heard, and we learned what factors were associated with these athletes getting and staying involved with Paralympic sport, including some of the challenges and catalysts to achieving and maintaining elite sport status. We also gained insight into the perspective of the team’s coaches, the team’s healthcare providers, and some national and international classifiers. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... iiv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ xii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... xiii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................1 Statement of the Problem ................................................................................................ 4 Purposes of This Study .................................................................................................... 5 Rationale for This Study ................................................................................................. 6 Research Questions ......................................................................................................... 7 Definition of Terms ......................................................................................................... 8 Assumptions .................................................................................................................. 10 Limitations .................................................................................................................... 11 Primary Investigator’s Relationship to the Topic ......................................................... 11 Significance of the Study .............................................................................................. 13 Organization of the Dissertation ................................................................................... 14 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE........................................................................................16 Introduction to Paralympic Sport .................................................................................. 16 Power of Adaptive Sport ............................................................................................23 Barriers and Facilitators to Participation ....................................................................25 Sport Socialization ........................................................................................................ 26 Socialization Into Sport ..............................................................................................27 Socialization Via Sport ...............................................................................................36 Implications for Healthcare Providers........................................................................... 48 vii Epidemiology and Injury Prevention .........................................................................53 Ethical and Legal
Recommended publications
  • Disability Classification System

    Disability Classification System

    CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso.
  • Bonn, 08 June 2015 Final Rio Medal Event Programme Dear President

    Bonn, 08 June 2015 Final Rio Medal Event Programme Dear President

    President / Secretary General NPCs Widely and Regularly Practising Athletics Via Email Bonn, 08 June 2015 Final Rio Medal Event Programme Dear President / Secretary General IPC Athletics would like to advise you of the Final Rio Medal Event Programme that has been approved by the International Paralympic Committee Governing Board during their meeting in Tokyo from 5 – 7 June 2015. In developing the Rio Medal event programme IPC Athletics have focused on the long term development of para-athletics. This event programme allows for stability, growth and development of the sport due to the use of the principles that have been applied throughout this process. IPC Athletics believe that the process undertaken in the development of para-athletics in the areas of competition, classification and education has been successful in allowing the development the Rio Paralympic Games medal event programme. Listed below you will see a number of the successful outcomes in the development process of the Rio 2016 Games Programme that are aligned with the original principles set out in 2011: . 12.5% increase in overall participation between from the end of 2012 to the end of 2014 . 11% increase in female participation from the end of 2012 to the end of 2014 . 6.4% increase in female events at the Paralympic Games, changing from 60.6% male and 39.4% female in London 2012 to 54.2% male and 45.8% female in Rio 2016 . 22% increase in the number of female athlete’s participating in para-athletics at the Rio 2016 Paralympic Games . An increase of 21 events that cater for athletes with high support needs, split nine (9) male and twelve (12) female events International Paralympic Committee Adenauerallee 212-214 Tel.
  • Program-2018.Pdf

    Program-2018.Pdf

    0 Welcome to our 2018 conference! We are glad that you GENERAL INFORMATION are here. We would like to take an opportunity to Signing in: Nurses and ADRS employees are required to acknowledge the following organizations for their financial sign in at the CE registration table. support: Nametags will be issued at conference registration. You • United Cerebral Palsy of Alabama must have your nametag to attend sessions. • Alabama Department of Early Childhood Education • Alabama Department of Education/SES Seating: Some sessions will have limited space due to • Alabama Department of Mental Health room size. Seating will be on a first come basis. • Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services/Alabama’s Early Intervention System Handouts: In general, handouts will not be provided on • Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind site, but for those presenters who submit handouts, they • Therap Services are or will be available on the conference website at www.ucpalabama.org/conference. We also would like to recognize the following individuals who volunteered their expertise, time, energy, and Exhibitors: Many marvelous exhibits will be available for resources to ensure a quality conference experience for all! you. Please visit them during your break. 2018 Planning Committee: Legislative initiative: The “Write Your Legislator” central • Deana Aumalis, University of AL Huntsville station will be at the registration area. We encourage • Isaac Beavers, Alabama Institute for Deaf/Blind everyone to visit the booth to participate in our “Pinning • Tania Baldwin, Alabama's EI System Their Future on You” campaign. We will print out a copy of • Amy Blakeney, Alabama’s EI System your legislator contact information, have cards there for • Sheila Bolling, Alabama Dept of Education/SES you to write a note to your legislator, and mail your card for you.
  • Processing Framework and Match-Up Database MODIS Algorithm Version 3 By

    Processing Framework and Match-Up Database MODIS Algorithm Version 3 By

    Processing Framework and Match-up Database MODIS Algorithm Version 3 By Robert H. Evans University of Miami Miami, FL 33149-1098 April 30, 1999 Appendix 1 - ATBD A1.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................... 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 7 1.1 Algorithm and Product Identification........................................................................7 1.2 Algorithm Overview..........................................................................................7 1.3 Document Scope ..............................................................................................7 1.4 Applicable Documents and Publications .....................................................................7 2.0 OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................... 7 2.1 Experimental Objective ......................................................................................7 2.2 Historical Perspective ........................................................................................8 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALGORITHM................................................................. 8 3.1 Introduction based on AVHRR-Oceans Pathfinder .........................................................8 Matchup Databases ..............................................................................................8 3.1.1 Global matchup databases............................................................................................................9
  • Athletes with Physical, Visual and Intellectual Impairments

    Athletes with Physical, Visual and Intellectual Impairments

    Para Athletes (Athletes with Physical, Visual and Intellectual Impairments) • Events offered are 100m, 200m, 400m, 4x100m Relay (mixed classification/age/gender), discus, shot put, javelin, high jump and long jump. Para Athletes who wish to compete in other events need to apply to the organizing committee through their managers. Classification Athletes with Physical, Visual and Intellectual Impairments competing at the 2021 North Island Secondary Schools Athletics Championships in Hamilton are required to have a Provisional or National Classification. Classification ensures that athletes meet impairment eligibility and have an activity limitation Athletes who do not have a Provisional or National Classification will need to have completed one of the Provisional Classification forms(Physical, Intellectual or Visual Impairment, whichever is the most appropriate one) available on the Athletics NZ website www.athletics.org.nz or the NZSSAA website www.nzssaa.org.nz in the North Island Championships information. This form needs to be forwarded to [email protected] as soon as possible and no later than 26 March. Classifications and Competition Para Athletes will have a track classification (T) and a field classification (F). The following track and field classifications relate to the following impairments. T11 – T13 and F11 – F13 Visual Impairment (VI) T20 and F20 Intellectual Impairment(II) T32 – T38 and F31 – F38 Cerebral Palsy and Neurological Impairments(CP) T40 - T41 and F40 - F41 Short Stature(SS) T42 – T47 and F42 – F46 Amputees and Other Impairments (AO) T51 – T54 and F51 – F57 Wheelchair and throwing frame user (WC) T61 – T64 and F61 - 64 Athletes who compete using prosthetic lower limbs (PL) There will be two competition divisions, Para Athletes with Intellectual Impairment (II) and Para Athletes with Physical Impairment, including Para Athletes with Visual Impairment (PI).
  • PI Classification Schedule GLRG.Xlsx

    PI Classification Schedule GLRG.Xlsx

    Great Lakes Regional Games Classification Schedule for Athletes with a Physical Impairment Version 1.6 Athletes - Must present to the Classification Centre 15 minutes before the allocated time on the classification schedule. Must bring a passport or some other official form of identification to classification. Will be required to read and sign a classification release form prior to presenting to the classification panel. May be accompanied by one athlete representative and/or an interpreter. Must be appropriately dressed in their sport clothes including shorts under tracksuits and sport shoes. Must bring their track chairs, strapping etc that they will be using in competition, to the classification session. Must ensure their throwing frames are at the stadium for technical assessments if necessary. Classification Day 1 Date: 9 June 2016 Time Panel SDMS NPC Family Name First Name Gender Class In Status In CLASS OUT STATUS OUT 9:00 1 31066 USA Williams Taleah Female T46 New T47 Confirmed 2 31008 USA Croft Philip Male T54 Review T54 CRS 9:45 1 15912 USA Rigo Isaiah Male T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31016 USA Nelson Brian Male F37 New F37 Confirmed 10:30 1 31218 USA Beaudoin Margaret Female T37 New T37/F37 CNS 2 30821 USA Evans Frederick Male T34 Review F34 CRS 11:15 1 11241 USA Weber Amberlynn Female T53 Review T53 CRS 2 31330 USA Langi Siale Male F43 New F43 Confirmed 11:45 1 31098 USA Johnson Shayna Female T44 New T44 Confirmed 2 27200 USA Frederick Emily Female F40 New F40 Confirmed 12:15 1 Technical Assessments 2 13:00 Lunch 14:00 1 20880 USA
  • 8. Eligibility for Special Education Services A

    8. Eligibility for Special Education Services A

    8. Eligibility for Special Education Services a. Fact Sheets on i. ADHD Fact Sheet on Disabilities from NICHCY (http://nichcy.org/disability) ii. Autism Spectrum Disorders Fact Sheet iii. Blindness/Visual Impairment Fact Sheet iv. Cerebral Palsy Fact Sheet v. Deaf-Blindness Fact Sheet vi. Deafness and Hearing Loss Fact Sheet vii. Developmental Delay Fact Sheet viii. Down Syndrome Fact Sheet ix. Emotional Disturbance Fact Sheet x. Epilepsy Fact Sheet xi. Intellectual Disabilities Fact Sheet xii. Learning Disabilities Fact Sheet xiii. Other Health Impairment Fact Sheet xiv. Traumatic Brain Injury Fact Sheet b. Disability Worksheets for Eligibility for Special Education (from OSSE/DCPS) i. Other Health Impairment Disability Worksheet ii. Specific Learning Disability Worksheet iii. Emotional Disturbance Disability Worksheet Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder NICHCY Disability Fact Sheet #19 Updated March 2012 break down his lessons into gets to choose something fun several parts. Then they have he’d like to do. Having a him do each part one at a child with AD/HD is still a Mario’s Story time. This helps Mario keep challenge, but things are his attention on his work. looking better. Mario is 10 years old. When he was 7, his family At home, things have learned he had AD/HD. At changed, too. Now his What is AD/HD? the time, he was driving parents know why he’s so everyone crazy. At school, he active. They are careful to Attention-deficit/hyperac- couldn’t stay in his seat or praise him when he does tivity disorder (AD/HD) is a keep quiet. At home, he something well.
  • Para Athletics Classification Are You, Or Do You Know Someone Who May Be, Interested in Para Athletics?

    Para Athletics Classification Are You, Or Do You Know Someone Who May Be, Interested in Para Athletics?

    PARA ATHLETICS CLASSIFICATION ARE YOU, OR DO YOU KNOW SOMEONE WHO MAY BE, INTERESTED IN PARA ATHLETICS? Classification determines who is eligible to compete in a Para sport and then groups the eligible athletes into sport classes according to their activity limitation in a certain sport or event. Athletes are classified as “T” (Track and Jump) or “F” (Field) based on which event they are competing in, followed by a number that represents impairment type and level of impairment. For example, T12. First Letter Represents: First Number Represents: Second Number Represents: T/F TRACK OR FIELD 1-6 IMPAIRMENT TYPE 1-8 DESCRIPTION OF IMPAIRMENT Typically T identifies a track 1 = Visual Impairment The number 1 through 8 specifies event and F for a field event. 2 = Intellectual Impairment the description of the impairment as There are certain exceptions 3 = Co-ordination Impairment per the classification rules (i.e. Long Jump is a T event) 4 = Upper Limb Deficiencies; Lower Limb Deficiencies without the use of prosthetic; short stature 5 = Impaired muscle power or range of movement 6 = Limb deficiencies with the use of prosthetic PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHORT STATURE F40 F41 IMPAIRED MUSCLE POWER AND/OR PASSIVE RANGE OF MOVEMENT T/F51 T/F52 T/F53 T/F54 F55 F56 F57 Athletes who compete seated LIMB DEFICIENCY T/F42 T/F43 T/F44 T/F62 T/F63 T/F64 T/F45 T/F46 T/47 Lower limb deficiency without Lower limb deficiency with Upper limb deficiency the use of a prosthetic the use of a prosthetic with or without the use of a prosthetic ATHLETES WITH ATHETOSIS, ATAXIA AND/OR
  • VMAA-Performance-Sta

    VMAA-Performance-Sta

    Revised June 18, 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans Training in Paralympic and Olympic Sports Program (VMAA) In partnership with the United States Olympic Committee and other Olympic and Paralympic entities within the United States, VA supports eligible service and non-service-connected military Veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games, Olympic Games and other international sport competitions. The VA Office of National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans training in Paralympic sports, as well as certain disabled Veterans selected for or competing with the national Olympic Team, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. 322(d) and Section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program, VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with either a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum military standards or higher (i.e. Emerging Athlete or National Team) in his or her respective Paralympic sport at a recognized competition. In addition to making the VMAA standard, an athlete must also be nationally or internationally classified by his or her respective Paralympic sport federation as eligible for Paralympic competition. VA will also pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected disability rated 30 percent or greater by VA who is selected for a national Olympic Team for any month in which the Veteran is competing in any event sanctioned by the National Governing Bodies of the Olympic Sport in the United State, in accordance with P.L.
  • Alpine Soil Bacterial Community and Environmental Filters Bahar Shahnavaz

    Alpine Soil Bacterial Community and Environmental Filters Bahar Shahnavaz

    Alpine soil bacterial community and environmental filters Bahar Shahnavaz To cite this version: Bahar Shahnavaz. Alpine soil bacterial community and environmental filters. Other [q-bio.OT]. Université Joseph-Fourier - Grenoble I, 2009. English. tel-00515414 HAL Id: tel-00515414 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00515414 Submitted on 6 Sep 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE Pour l’obtention du titre de l'Université Joseph-Fourier - Grenoble 1 École Doctorale : Chimie et Sciences du Vivant Spécialité : Biodiversité, Écologie, Environnement Communautés bactériennes de sols alpins et filtres environnementaux Par Bahar SHAHNAVAZ Soutenue devant jury le 25 Septembre 2009 Composition du jury Dr. Thierry HEULIN Rapporteur Dr. Christian JEANTHON Rapporteur Dr. Sylvie NAZARET Examinateur Dr. Jean MARTIN Examinateur Dr. Yves JOUANNEAU Président du jury Dr. Roberto GEREMIA Directeur de thèse Thèse préparée au sien du Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine (LECA, UMR UJF- CNRS 5553) THÈSE Pour l’obtention du titre de Docteur de l’Université de Grenoble École Doctorale : Chimie et Sciences du Vivant Spécialité : Biodiversité, Écologie, Environnement Communautés bactériennes de sols alpins et filtres environnementaux Bahar SHAHNAVAZ Directeur : Roberto GEREMIA Soutenue devant jury le 25 Septembre 2009 Composition du jury Dr.
  • The Children's Center at UCP Education Reopening Plan September 2020

    The Children's Center at UCP Education Reopening Plan September 2020

    The Children’s Center at UCP United Cerebral Palsy Association of Greater Suffolk, Inc. Education Reopening Plan September 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………2 COMMUNICATION/FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT……………5 HEALTH AND SAFETY………………………………………………….13 FACILITIES……………………………………………………………..27 NUTRITION……………………………………………………………..28 TRANSPORTATION…………………………………………………….29 SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL WELL BEING………………………….…….30 SCHOOL SCHEDULES ……………………………………..…………..33 ATTENDANCE & CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM……………….……………37 TECHNOLOGY AND CONNECTIVITY……………..……………………..41 TEACHING AND LEARNING…………………………….………………46 SPECIAL EDUCATION…………………………………………………..49 1 INTRODUCTION It is difficult to comprehend how much our world has changed since March of 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our students, their families, our staff and our schools in ways many of us have yet to fully understand. At these unprecedented times, we must reflect on the end of the 2019-20 school year to learn from our decisions to help inform our actions for the year ahead. There is no doubt that the 2020-21 school year will provide its own set of unique challenges. It is our goal to utilize this document to prepare our staff, students, families and partner Counties and School Districts for the wide variety of situations that we may face in the year ahead. This document was developed through the collective efforts of United Cerebral Palsy Association of Greater Suffolk, Inc., The Children’s
  • View of the Algorithm Will Be Discussed Below to Summarize the Key Points of the Algorithm

    View of the Algorithm Will Be Discussed Below to Summarize the Key Points of the Algorithm

    EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Dissertation Submitted to The School of Engineering of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electro-Optics By Mallik Mohd Raihan Hussain Dayton, Ohio May, 4242 EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Name: Hussain, Mallik Mohd Raihan APPROVED BY: Imad Agha, Ph.D. Andrew Sarangan, Ph.D. Advisory Committee Chairman Committee Member Associate Professor, Department of Professor, Department of Physics, and, Department of Electro- Electro-Optics and Photonics Optics and Photonics Partha Banerjee, Ph.D. Michael Scalora, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Professor and Department Chair, Research Physicist, Charles M. Department of Electro-Optics and Bowden Research Facility, Photonics AMRDEC, US Army RDECOM Robert J. Wilkens, Ph.D., P.E. Eddy M. Rojas, Ph.D., M.A., P.E. Associate Dean for Research Dean, School of Engineering and Innovation Professor, School of Engineering ii © Copyright by Mallik Mohd Raihan Hussain All rights reserved 4242 ABSTRACT EFFECTIVE NONLINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF METAL-INSULATOR AND METAL-INSULATOR-METAL NANOLAYERED STRUCTURES Name: Hussain, Mallik Mohd Raihan University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Imad Agha Nonlinear electromagnetic radiation (second and third harmonic) from the metal-insulator and metal-insulator-metal structures were measured and compared against predictions from the hydrodynamic models of plasmonics. This model incorporated higher order terms stem- ming from electron tunneling and nonlocality. This study shows that, besides the linear optical parameter like permittivity, conductivity etc, changes in the nonlinear optical pa- rameters, namely, second and third order susceptibilities (χ(2) and χ(3), respectively) can also be used to probe and compare the higher-order terms of the hydrodynamic model of plasmonics.