Knapp Commission Report 1972 Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Knapp Commission Report 1972 Pdf Knapp commission report 1972 pdf Continue Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 7 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 35 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 77 Page 77 Page 77 Page 77 Page 77 Page 78 Page 78 Page 79 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 85 Page 87 Page 87 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 98 Page 99 Page 99 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 133 Page 134 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 154 Page 155 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Knappa Commission was a committee of five citizens created and punctured by then-New York Mayor John Lindsey in 1972, who tried to investigate the corrupt activities of police officers, detectives and executives working for the New York Police Department (NYPD). Mayor Lindsay was forced to investigate corruption in the NYPD after a series of articles that appeared in local newspapers detailed a wide range of corrupt activities by officers across the NYPD. The first article in the series was written by a reporter named David Burnham, and the article appeared in the New York Times. Two NYPD officers, Frank Serpico and David Durk, were the main sources of information for Burnham's article. Frank Serpico and David Darke were once idealistic officers who became increasingly frustrated after trying to report executives. From the initial indoctrination at the NYPD, officers noticed that other officers received free food and coffee and often offered bribes instead of issuing subpoenas. When Frank Serpico was transferred to an undercover unit in plainclothes, he found that the corruption there was even more systematic and sophisticated in that many officers and detectives were on the pads (controlled payments to the police). Serpico and Durk eventually complained to the district attorney's office, a non-New York police agency. Dissatisfied with the investigation's permission, Serpico, Durk and other officers who were also disgusted A reporter named David Burnham, who worked for the New York Times, was arrested on April 25, 1970, on the front page of an article about nypd corruption. The article opened in one of the biggest scandals in the history of the NYPD and Mayor Lindsay created the Knapp Commission in 1971, named after the judge Mayor Lindsay chose, Whitman Knapp. The scale of New York, the size of the NYPD, and the superiority of New York as the media capital of the world strengthened scrutiny on the NYPD and NYPD cops. The NYPD, as the official police agency, was chartered and centralized in 1844. The early patrol nypD, as they were known then, were appointed under the will of local parish politicians and hoped to protect the illegal racketeering of the parish politician who appointed patrolmen, especially vice-rocketss, who at that time in history consisted mainly of illegal sale of alcohol and prostitution-related criminal activities. Thus began a cyclical picture of corruption and reform. One of the first police reformers in New York, the future President of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt, was the Commissioner of the New York City Police. Roosevelt, along with the reformed clergy, Charles Henry Parkhurst, initiated the work of the Lexow Committee to investigate police corruption in New York. According to the Lexow Committee, police corruption in New York was firmly entrenched in local government policy. Other commissions that investigated police misconduct in the NYPD followed in 1913, 1930 and 1950. The Knapp Commission was the next major commission of inquiry into police misconduct and corruption. The Knapp Commission found that the most serious police misconduct involved in the provision of prostitution, gambling and drugs. In New York, the illicit street trade in drugs (mainly heroin) continues to grow, creating new opportunities for corruption prior to the Knapp Commission investigation. The Knapp Commission found that corrupt NYPD officers collected protection money and were on the site, which meant that they took bribes from criminals to ensure that their illegal activities could continue without the threat of investigation or arrest by the police. Many of the criminals involved in bribing police officers prior to the Knapp Commission were involved in racketeering, such as prostitution and gambling. However, the Knapp Commission and subsequent investigations have shown that the light flow of currency involved in the illicit drug trade provides new opportunities for corruption. One of the commission's key witnesses was a police officer named William Phillips, who was found to have taken bribes during the commission's investigation. The findings of the Knapp Commission two main types of corrupt officers, grass eaters and meat-eaters. Grass eaters took free food and bribes, which they were offered. Meat-eaters openly requested free food and actively extorted bribes and tried to obtain assignments from law enforcement agencies that were authorized to enforce laws on gambling, prostitution and drugs. One of the main recommendations of the Knapp Commission is to appoint a special prosecutor (outside the City of New York) to investigate police corruption, reorganize the New York Police Department and hold the command for corrupt officers accountable. Frank Serpico was shot in the face during a covert anti-drug operation on 3 February 1971 and was seriously wounded. He eventually testified before the Knapp Commission, and the recommendations of the Knapp Commission led to many anti-corporate strategies in the NYPD. The film, detailing Serpico's efforts, was made in 1973 starring Al Pacino as Serpico. Sir Pico retired in 1972 on disability pension and is now active in efforts to reform the police. David Darke also testified before the Knapp Commission, and his career was reportedly affected as a result, and he eventually resigned in 1985. Eventually, in 1992, another commission called the Mollen Commission was set up to investigate alleged corruption in the NYPD. A New York police officer named Michael Dowd was arrested for drug trafficking in New York City and outside New York City in the suburban neighborhood where Dowd lived. The emergence of the crack cocaine street trade in New York in the 1980s, as well as the growing heroin trade in the 1960s, provided greater opportunities for corruption. Corruption consisted of police officers stealing drugs and cash from drug traffickers and, in some cases, protecting illicit drug trafficking. Unlike the findings of the Knapp Commission, the Mollen Commission found that this corrupt activity was limited to a few sites. The Mollen Commission did not come to the point that corruption is systematic in the NYPD, as has previous anti-corruption investigations in the NYPD. The Mollen Commission found that the corruption was the result of an operation by a crew, a small group of police officers usually on the same mission and during the same hours of work. The Investigative Committee This article contains a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it does not have enough relevant references. Please help improve this article by entering more accurate quotes. (November 2009) (Learn how and when to delete this template message) The Whitman Knapp Commission of Inquiry into Alleged Police Corruption (known informally as the Knapp Commission, after its chairman Whitman Knapp) was a five-member panel originally formed in April 1970 by Mayor John W. Lindsey Lindsey investigate corruption at the New York City Police Department. The establishment of the commission was largely the result of publicity generated by public revelations of police corruption made by patrolman Frank Serpico and Sgt. David Durk. The Commission confirmed widespread corruption and made a number of recommendations. Members in 1970, Mayor Lindsay appointed five members to serve on the Knapp Commission: Whitman Knapp, Chairman Arnold Bauman (later replaced by John E. Sprizzo) Joseph Montserrat Franklin A. Thomas Cyrus Vance Investigation and Public Hearings While the Knapp Commission began its investigation into corruption in the police department in June 1970, public hearings did not begin until October 18, 1971. In addition to the testimony of the lanterns (debunkers), Serpico and Durka heard testimony from dozens of other witnesses, including former Howard Police Commissioner R. Leary, corrupt patrolmen and victims of police shake-ups.
Recommended publications
  • They Wished They Were Honest : the Knapp Commission and New York City Police Corruption Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THEY WISHED THEY WERE HONEST : THE KNAPP COMMISSION AND NEW YORK CITY POLICE CORRUPTION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michael Armstrong | 272 pages | 05 Jun 2012 | Columbia University Press | 9780231153546 | English | New York, United States They Wished They Were Honest : The Knapp Commission and New York City Police Corruption PDF Book It tells the story of the day-by-day efforts of the Knapp Commission to expose corruption known to pervade the NYC Police Department but never before proved. The Police Foundation has a handful of employees. I read this to prepare to write a paper related to ethics and public relations for a class assignment, and I had started out thinking I would read highlights to get a gist, but I couldn't put it down and read the whole thing in two days. Armstrong, who served as the chief counsel on the group tasked with trying to clean up the mess. Read Next. Community Reviews. MTNWishlist added it Apr 15, Robert S. Save on Nonfiction Trending price is based on prices over last 90 days. Chief Counsel Armstrong cobbled together an investigative group of a half-dozen lawyers and a dozen agents. Armstrong is a partner at the law firm Lankler and Carragher in New York. Columbia University Press. Roosevelt forced out one senior detective who had amassed a fortune under the table from patrons on Wall Street. While the special prosecutor that the Knapp Commission called for in the s to investigate police corruption has been disbanded for over 20 years, the New York City Police Foundation has prospered.
    [Show full text]
  • Bad Cops: a Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Bad Cops: A Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers Author(s): James J. Fyfe ; Robert Kane Document No.: 215795 Date Received: September 2006 Award Number: 96-IJ-CX-0053 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Bad Cops: A Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers James J. Fyfe John Jay College of Criminal Justice and New York City Police Department Robert Kane American University Final Version Submitted to the United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice February 2005 This project was supported by Grant No. 1996-IJ-CX-0053 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of views in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Police Commissioner's Report
    THE POLICE COMMISSIONER’S REPORT JANUARY 2016 THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 22 40 58 INFORMATION HOUSING BUREAU RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY BUREAU BUREAU TABLE OF CONTENTS 26 42 60 DETECTIVE BUREAU VIOLENCE- PERSONNEL REDUCTION TASK BUREAU / STAFFING FORCES 44 ORGANIZED CRIME 62 28 CONTROL BUREAU PERSONNEL COLLABORATIVE BUREAU / REFORM 4 POLICING 46 AND RECRUITMENT TRANSPORTATION LETTER FROM 30 BUREAU 64 THE MAYOR CRITICAL RESPONSE CIVILIAN MEMBERS 6 COMMAND 48 FIELD INTELLIGENCE 66 LETTER FROM 32 OFFICERS THE POLICE FACILITIES COMMISSIONER STRATEGIC RESPONSE GROUP 50 68 10 GRAND LARCENY 34 DIVISION CARS & EQUIPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD POLICING PLAN COMMUNITY AFFAIRS BUREAU / YOUTH PROGRAMS 52 70 14 ADMINISTRATION STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS COMPSTAT 36 COMMUNITY 54 AFFAIRS BUREAU / 72 16 SCHOOL SAFETY USE-OF-FORCE DIVISION POLICY 2014 / 2015 STATISTICAL TRAINING BUREAU ROUNDUP 20 38 56 76 TRANSIT BUREAU DISCIPLINE COMMUNITY NYPD HISTORICAL PARTNER PROGRAM TIMELINE SPRING 3100 ISSN #0038 8572 is published bimonthly by the New York City Police Department, One Police Plaza, New York, 10038. Periodicals postage paid at New York City, NY. “Ride-Along Enclosed” Postmaster: Send address changes to SPRING 3100 c/o New York City Police Department, One Police Plaza, New York, 10038. SPRING 3100 ©2014 BY NYPD. All rights reserved; No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent of the Editor. L E T T ER FROM MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO appointed Bill Bratton to be New York City Police Department’s technological infrastructure; new use-of-force ICommissioner in January 2014, and, two years later, this policies and procedures; a more efficient and fairer internal report—about the sweeping changes in the NYPD— discipline system; 1,300 new officers; new technological underscores my reasons for doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Alex S. Vitale
    The End of Policing The End of Policing Alex S. Vitale First published by Verso 2017 © Alex S. Vitale 2017 All rights reserved The moral rights of the author have been asserted 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Verso UK: 6 Meard Street, London W1F 0EG US: 20 Jay Street, Suite 1010, Brooklyn, NY 11201 versobooks.com Verso is the imprint of New Left Books ISBN-13: 978-1-78478-289-4 ISBN-13: 978-1-78478-291-7 (US EBK) ISBN-13: 978-1-78478-290-0 (UK EBK) British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Vitale, Alex S., author. Title: The end of policing / Alex Vitale. Description: Brooklyn : Verso, 2017. Identifiers: LCCN 2017020713 | ISBN 9781784782894 (hardback) | ISBN 9781784782917 (US ebk) | ISBN 9781784782900 (UK ebk) Subjects: LCSH: Police—United States. | Police misconduct—United States. | BISAC: POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Law Enforcement. | SOCIAL SCIENCE / Discrimination & Race Relations. | POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General. Classification: LCC HV8139 .V58 2017 | DDC 363.20973—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017020713 Typeset in Sabon by MJ & N Gavan, Truro, Cornwall Printed in the US by Maple Press Contents 1. The Limits of Police Reform 2. The Police Are Not Here to Protect You 3. The School-to-Prison Pipeline 4. “We Called for Help, and They Killed My Son” 5. Criminalizing Homelessness 6. The Failures of Policing Sex Work 7. The War on Drugs 8. Gang Suppression 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Police Deviance
    CHAPTER SEVEN POLICE DEVIANCE olice officers are human beings, and, as with all human beings, there are good ones P and bad ones, honest ones and corrupt ones. But the power and authority that the police have over the rest of us makes police misconduct unique and uniquely danger- ous. Sometimes they misbehave for what they believe are good reasons, anddistribute sometimes they misbehave for selfish reasons. Often it’s somewhere in between the two. Sometimes they are responding to pressure from other officers, sometimes they are acting on their own initiative, and sometimes they are simply caught up in much bigger social forces that are beyond everyone’s control. But because they have power overor us and because most Americans place a great deal of trust in the police, the misconduct of officers can be a very big problem—if a society is rotten, it is often the police that are the core of the problem. In this chapter, we will discuss police deviance. We will look at all forms of police misbehavior or police misconduct that are committed by officers in their professional capacity. If a police officer steps out of line in her private life, this is certainly a form of deviance, but it is not police deviance—the abuse of the unique powers of an officer are what we will discuss here. Police deviance includespost, corruption, that is, the abuse of police authority for personal gain—usually for money but sometimes for favors, including sexual favors. But police deviance can also involve things like excessive force, police brutality, and racial profiling—misconduct that is committed because officers believe that it is necessary for them to do their jobs, rather than being committed out of self-interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Hello and Thank You for Your Interest. I Want to Provide You with Information
    Hello and thank you for your interest. I want to provide you with information about my legal background. I have been practicing law in state and federal trial and appellate courts since 1988. Although my interests and experience run a wide range, my primary areas of focus center around civil rights work, employment and labor issues, and protecting the rights of individuals whose rights have even violated by others, typically governmental actors and large private employers. I have extensive trial experience in these types of cases, and I invite you to look up the numerous reported cases that I have handled. A sample of several of the cases I have handled is attached, and these cases involve various civil, employment and commercial matters, including constitutional rights, discrimination, employment law and sundry types of commercial disputes, such as antitrust, securities, and contract cases. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. 14-CV-8065 (VEC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Airday v. City of New York 406 F. Supp. 3d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) Decided Sep 13, 2019 14-CV-8065 (VEC) 09-13-2019 George AIRDAY, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK and Keith Schwam, Defendants. Nathaniel B. Smith, Law Office of Nathaniel B. Smith, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Christopher Aaron Seacord, Jeremy Laurence Jorgensen, William Andrew Grey, Paul Frederick Marks, Don Hanh Nguyen, New York City Law Depart. Office of the Corporation Counsel, New York, NY, Garrett Scott Kamen, Fisher & Phillips LLP, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Corruption Is a Universal Problem, but It Is a Particular Challenge in Countries in Crisis and Emerging from Conflict
    UNITeD StateS INSTITUTe of Peace www.usip.org SPeCIAL RePoRT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPO R T David Bayley and Robert Perito Police corruption is a universal problem, but it is a particular challenge in countries in crisis and emerging from conflict. This report is based on the lessons gleaned from a review of public commissions of inquiry into police misconduct worldwide and their possible application in stability operations, such as those Police Corruption in Iraq and Afghanistan. The study attempts to determine whether past scandals can help us deal more effectively with the contemporary problems of nation building and police reform. What Past Scandals Teach about Current ABOUT THE AUTHO R S Challenges David Bayley is the former dean and current distinguished professor of the School of Criminal Justice at the State University of New York at Albany. He was a member of the International Summary Oversight Commission for police reform in Northern Ireland. Bayley is also a member of the UN Global Police Policy • Police corruption is an international problem. Historically, police misconduct has been a Community advisory group. He is the author of Changing the factor in the development of police institutions worldwide, but it is a particular problem in Guard: Developing Democratic Police Abroad (2006) and other counterinsurgency and peacekeeping operations, such as the U.S.-led North Atlantic Treaty books. Robert Perito is the director of the Security Sector Organization police training program in Afghanistan. There, police abuse and corruption Governance Center at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: a National Police Crisis
    1 A NATIONAL POLICE CRISIS Learning Objectives distribute After reading this chapter, you should be able to answer the following questions: 1. What has been the effect of the national police crisis?or 2. What do we mean by “police accountability”? 3. What is the purpose of the PTSR Framework? 4. Why is the goal of organizational post,change important? FERGUSON 2014: THE SHOOTING OF MICHAEL BROWN Michael Brown, an 18-year-old African American man, was shot and killed by a white police officercopy, in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 9, 2014. Brown was unarmed, and officials left his body in the middle of the street for four hours. Local residents quickly gathered to protest the shooting. Around noon that day, Officer Darren Wilson had received a dispatcher report of a “stealing in prog- ress” atnot a local store. Wilson then saw Brown jaywalking in the street and stopped him. A physical encounter ensued, and Wilson’s gun discharged while he was still in his patrol car. Brown then fled and was about 30 feet away from Wilson when he began approaching again. Wilson fired six shots, killing Brown.1 Do As protesters continued to gather, the police sent multiple police cars and canine units to the scene. The following day, peaceful memorials were held at the scene, but in the evening some people at the scene became disorderly. The police responded with about 150 officers in riot gear. Some protesters then turned violent and began looting stores, destroying vehicles, and confronting police officers. With 2 Copyright ©2020 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of the Ethical Whistleblower
    A bi-weekly newsletter to inform Union members on important grievance results, trends, procedures and important information relevant to a better quality of work life. The Arizona Correctional Peace Officers Association In This Issue: Check and Mate Newsletter No. 24 -The Power of the Ethical Whistleblower Francesco Vincent Serpico is a former New York City Police Department officer who holds both American and Italian citizenship. He is known for whistleblowing on police corruption in the late 1960s and early 1970s, an act that prompted Mayor John V. Lindsay to appoint the landmark Knapp Commission to investigate the NYPD. The Check and As this is not intended to be an in- Mate Newsletter depth analysis of that case, I invite you to either read his own account of No. 24 the case, or to simply rent the movie “Serpico” starring Al Pacino, an A bi-weekly newsletter to inform Union excellent film in itself. members on important grievance results, trends, procedures and important What then, is an Ethical information relevant to a better quality of Whistleblower, and why is that the work life. topic of this week’s newsletter? The Power of the Well, as all of you are already aware, we had a whistleblower step forth this Ethical past week revealing corruption within Whistleblower the department of corrections in the form of “deliberate indifference” after video was leaked from said When one hears about a whistleblower whistleblower to AZ. C.P.O.A. staff coming forth from the world of law who in turn provided the video to a enforcement, the first name that media liaison.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Resource Management: Patrol, Investigation, Scheduling
    Law Enforcement Executive FORUM Police Resource Management: Patrol, Investigation, Scheduling September 2006 Law Enforcement Executive Forum Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board Executive Institute Western Illinois University 1 University Circle Macomb, IL 61455 Senior Editor Thomas J. Jurkanin, PhD Editor Vladimir A. Sergevnin, PhD Associate Editors Jennifer Allen, PhD Department of Law Enforcement and Justice Administration Western Illinois University Barry Anderson, JD Department of Law Enforcement and Justice Administration Western Illinois University Tony Barringer, EdD Division of Justice Studies Florida Gulf Coast University Lewis Bender, PhD Department of Public Administration and Policy Analysis Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville Michael Bolton, PhD Chair, Department of Criminal Justice and Sociology Marymount University Dennis Bowman, PhD Department of Law Enforcement and Justice Administration Western Illinois University Weysan Dun Special Agent-in-Charge, FBI, Springfield Division Kenneth Durkin, MD Department of Law Enforcement and Justice Administration Western Illinois University Thomas Ellsworth, PhD Chair, Department of Criminal Justice Sciences Illinois State University Larry Hoover, PhD Director, Police Research Center Sam Houston State University William McCamey, PhD Department of Law Enforcement and Justice Administration Western Illinois University John Millner State Senator of 28th District, Illinois General Assembly Michael J. Palmiotto Wichita State University Frank Morn Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Police Management and Quotas: Governance in the Compstat Era
    Police Management and Quotas: Governance in the CompStat Era NATHANIEL BRONSTEIN* Police department activity quotas reduce police officer discretion and pro- mote the use of enforcement activity for reasons outside of law enforce- ment’s legitimate goals. States across the country have recognized these issues, as well as activity quotas’ negative effects on the criminal justice system and community–police relations, and have passed anti-quota legis- lation to address these problems. But despite this legislation, critics claim that police departments still employ management devices that similarly reduce police officer discretion and reward police officers for enforcement activity that does not further a legitimate law enforcement goal, with the same negative effects on the criminal justice system and community–police relations. This Note analyzes New York State’s anti-quota statute and its effectiveness at combating the evils it attempted to outlaw — reduced po- lice officer discretion, enforcement activity that does not further a legiti- mate law enforcement goal, decreased community–police relations, and negative impacts on the criminal justice system — using the New York City Police Department’s legal, non-quota-based management policies as a case study. These management policies and their effects will be deter- mined in part by interviewing former New York City Police Department uniformed members of the service.** * Finance Editor and Managing Editor, COLUM. J. L. & SOC. PROBS., 2014–15. J.D. 2015, Columbia Law School. The author would like to thank Professor Daniel Richman for his advice and support and the editorial staff of the Journal of Law and Social Problems for their efforts in preparing the piece for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelfth Annual Report of the Commission
    The City of New York Commission to Combat Police Corruption Twelfth Annual Report of the Commission Michael F. Armstrong Chair David Acevedo Commissioner Vernon S. Broderick Commissioner Kathy Hirata Chin Commissioner Edgardo Ramos Commissioner James D. Zirin Commissioner Marnie L. Blit Executive Director Maria C. Sciortino Deputy Executive Director February 2010 I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In 1994, the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Police Corruption and the Anti-Corruption Procedures of the Police Department (“Mollen Commission”), chaired by Milton Mollen, published a report describing its findings and recommendations after a twenty-two month investigation conducted into “the nature, extent and causes of police corruption in the New York City Police Department”1 (“NYPD” or “the Department”). Among its recommendations,2 the Mollen Commission proposed the formation of another, permanent commission to address the twenty-year cycle of corruption that it observed within the NYPD. In this cycle, which was also previously noted twenty-two years earlier by the Knapp Commission, the Department was beset by a corruption scandal approximately every twenty years. In the wake of each scandal, the Department executed institutional reforms to address the conditions that permitted corrupt officers to operate successfully. As time passed and public attention to the Department waned, conditions within the Department again developed that enabled corruption to grow. While the Mollen Commission asserted that the Department should retain the primary responsibility for policing itself,3 it also recommended the establishment of an independent, external monitor. This monitor would maintain pressure on the Department to discover and rid itself of corruption rather than relax and attempt to avoid negative publicity by turning a blind eye to corrupt and possibly corrupt conditions.
    [Show full text]