DOCSLIB.ORG

Identification of Outer Continental Shelf Renewable Energy Space-Use Conflicts and Analysis of Potential Mitigation Measures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Identification of Outer Continental Shelf Renewable Energy Space-Use Conflicts and Analysis of Potential Mitigation Measures OCS Study BOEM 2012-083 Identification of Outer Continental Shelf Renewable Energy Space-Use Conflicts and Analysis of Potential Mitigation Measures U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management OCS Study BOEM 2012-083 Identification of Outer Continental Shelf Renewable Energy Space-Use Conflicts and Analysis of Potential Mitigation Measures Principal Authors (alphabetical) Flaxen Conway, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University Madeleine Hall-Arber, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sea Grant College Program Michael Harte, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University Daniel Hudgens, Industrial Economics, Incorporated Thomas Murray, Virginia Institute of Marine Science Carrie Pomeroy, University of California, Santa Cruz Institute of Marine Sciences John Weiss, Industrial Economics, Incorporated Jack Wiggin, Urban Harbors Institute, University of Massachusetts, Boston Dawn Wright, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University Prepared under BOEM Contract M09PC00037 by Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management September 2012 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Industrial Economics, Incorporated. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM staff and has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the view and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and in compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report may be downloaded from the BOEM website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS) by referencing Study Number BOEM 2012-083. You will also be able to obtain this report in the near future from BOEM or from the National Technical Information Service at the following addresses. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management National Technical Information Service Division of Environmental Sciences, MS3115 5301 Shawnee Road 381 Elden Street Alexandria, VA 22312 Herndon, VA 20170-4817 [email protected] www.boem.gov CITATION Industrial Economics, Inc. 2012. Identification of Outer Continental Shelf renewable energy space-use conflicts and analysis of potential mitigation measures. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Herndon, VA. OCS Study BOEM 2012-083. 414 pp. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge the many people who contributed tirelessly to the completion of this study. Industrial Economics, Incorporated: Neal Etre, Kate Doiron, Kelley Kugel, Alex Oberg, Tripp Burwell, and John McKenzie MIT and MIT Sea Grant: Gayle Sherman, Joann Lin, Doug Christel Urban Harbors Institute: Dan Hellin, Kristin Uiterwyk, and Allison Novelly Oregon State University: Janet Webster, Colleen Sullivan, Kunipo Walsh, and Mike Friberg Eureka (CA) Sea Grant Extension Program: Debbie Marshall, Vivian Helliwell, and Susan Schlosser Research Planning, Incorporated: Zach Nixon, Jeff Dahlin, and Jacqui Michel Earen Peterson, Selina Faircrest and Trish Kauker (transcription services) The authors would also like to acknowledge and thank all of the people who volunteered their time to share valuable knowledge and insight about their uses of ocean resources. ii Table of Contents Page LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................... xi 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Purpose ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Scope .................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Study Elements ............................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Guide to the Report ....................................................................................................... 3 2.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Literature Review.......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Development of the Geospatial Database ..................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2.2 Sources of information ................................................................................... 9 2.2.3 Collection and data creation methods .......................................................... 12 2.2.4 Database organization .................................................................................. 13 2.3 Ethnographic Research ............................................................................................... 13 2.3.1 General methods .......................................................................................... 13 2.3.2 Atlantic coast ethnographic research ........................................................... 15 2.3.2.1 Atlantic coast commercial fishing ............................................. 15 2.3.2.2 Atlantic coast commercial vessels ............................................. 19 2.3.2.3 Atlantic coast non-commercial and other uses .......................... 22 2.3.2.4 Atlantic coast stakeholder meetings ........................................... 23 2.3.3 Pacific coast ethnographic research ............................................................. 23 2.3.3.1 Washington/Oregon ethnographic research ............................... 24 2.3.3.2 Northern California ethnographic research ................................ 27 2.3.3.3 Pacific coast stakeholder meetings ............................................ 31 3.0 FINDINGS: NORTHEAST ATLANTIC ......................................................................... 33 3.1 Regional Characterization ........................................................................................... 33 3.2 Commercial fishing ..................................................................................................... 45 3.2.1 Characteristics and use of space .................................................................. 45 3.2.2 Compatible and conflicting uses .................................................................. 47 3.2.3 Avoidance and mitigation strategies ............................................................ 49 3.2.4 Communication and process ........................................................................ 51 3.3 Commercial Vessels.................................................................................................... 54 3.3.1 Characteristics and use of space .................................................................. 54 3.3.2 Compatible and conflicting uses .................................................................. 55 3.3.3 Avoidance and mitigation strategies ............................................................ 57 3.3.4 Communication and process ........................................................................ 57 iii 3.4 Noncommercial uses ................................................................................................... 58 3.4.1 Characteristics and use of space .................................................................. 58 3.4.2 Compatible and conflicting uses .................................................................. 60 3.4.3 Avoidance and mitigation strategies ............................................................ 64 3.4.4 Communication and process ........................................................................ 64 4.0 FINDINGS: MID-ATLANTIC .......................................................................................... 67 4.1 Regional Characterization ........................................................................................... 67 4.2 Commercial fishing ..................................................................................................... 75 4.2.1 Characteristics and use of space .................................................................. 75 4.2.2 Compatible and conflicting uses .................................................................. 76 4.2.3 Avoidance and mitigation strategies ............................................................ 76 4.2.4 Communication and process ........................................................................ 77 4.3 Commercial Vessels.................................................................................................... 77 4.3.1 Characteristics and use of space .................................................................. 77 4.3.2 Compatible and conflicting uses .................................................................. 78 4.3.3 Avoidance and mitigation strategies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • $18 | 2021 the Explorers Club 50 the Explorers Club 50
    $18 | 2021 THE EXPLORERS CLUB 50 THE EXPLORERS CLUB 50 acknowledgements contents 2021 FOUNDING CORPORATE SPONSOR OF THE COMMITTEE FOR DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION INITIATIVE THE EXPLORERS 50 PROJECT Discovery Communications Joseph Rohde, Chairman the explorers club 50 Jeff Blumenfeld Marc Bryan-Brown INTRODUCTION FIFTY EXPLORERS EXPLORERS CHANGING THE EXPLORERS CLUB MAKING THE BOOK SUPPORT OF THE Kim Frank Richard Wiese FN’89 TO KNOW THE WORLD FIFTY PROCESS Lee Langan MED’99 J.R. Harris 5 Joseph M. Rohde FN’10 J. Robert “J.R.” Harris ME’93 Kim N. Frank FN’18 120 EXPLORERS 50 Alexandra Sutton Lawrence 7 10 16 PROJECT Nancy Nenow Nancy Rosenthal Richard & Laetitia Garriott de Cayeux Jalsa Urubshurow Daniel & Lois Kobal Trevor Wallace Richard Wiese awardees Gladys Kalema Zikusoka RUBEN ALEMAN-LUCERO, 39 LATONIA HARTERY, 63 JAMES PRIGOFF, 32 MARGARET O’LEARY AMSLER, 88 JOHN HOUSTON, 47 SIAN PROCTOR, 92 MEMBERS NOMINATING AWARDEES JOEY ANGNATOK, 28 ANDERS JEPSEN, 104 LOSANG RABGEY, 72 CALLIE BROADDUS, 91 SHELTON JOHNSON, 64 SAMUEL E. SULEIMAN RAMOS, 95 BRANDI DECARLI, 52 AYANA ELIZABETH JOHNSON, 67 MAMY RAZAFITSALAMA, 99 Bob Atwater Timothy Jacob Ann Passer SUPRAJA DHARINI, 24 INIT KEITH, 107 MARIO RIGBY, 48 Kathryn Britnell Lisa Keating Milbry Polk JUSTIN DUNNAVANT, 56 PETER LALAMPAA , 36 AVIJAHN SAHA, 60 Gov. Doug Burgum Lee Langan Maureen Raymo SUSAN R. EATON, 96 CASUARINA MCKINNEY-LAMBERT, 112 FAWN SHARP, 100 Greg Carr Alexandra Sutton Lawrence Buffy Redsecker KAARE SIKUAQ ERICKSON, 35 DANIELLE LEE, 23 MICHEL STROGOFF, 31 Julie Chase Damien Leloup Joe Rohde VICKI LYNN FERRINI, 103 JENERIA LEKILELEI, 111 CHIP THOMAS, 119 AYANA FLEWELLEN, 20 BINBIN LI, 108 SCOTT THOMPSON, 53 Jack Daulton Rebecca Martin Faanya Rose BILLY GAUTHIER, 51 ONKURI MAJUMDAR, 44 SATEESH VANKATESH, 40 Matthew DeSantis Rob McCallum Travis Steffens DOMINQUE GONCALVES, 76 JUAN MARTINEZ-PINEDA, 115 DONALD WARNE, 71 Jason Edmunds Kevin McCarey Arnella Trent MARC O GRIOFA, 87 CRAIG MATHIESON, 83 PAIGE WEST, 79 Scott C.
    [Show full text]
  • Open EC Finalmastersthesis.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Earth and Mineral Sciences DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS OF PALEOCENE PLANT LOCALITIES WITHIN ESTUARINE FACIES OF THE SALAMANCA FORMATION, CHUBUT PROVINCE, ARGENTINA A Thesis in Geosciences by Emily E. Comer © 2011 Emily E. Comer Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science December 2011 The thesis of Emily E. Comer was reviewed and approved* by the following: Rudy L. Slingerland Professor of Geology Thesis Advisor Peter D. Wilf Associate Professor of Geosciences Michael A. Arthur Professor of Geosciences Chris J. Marone Professor of Geosciences Associate Head of Graduate Program of the Department of Geosciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT The most well preserved and diverse early Paleocene macrofloras from Gondwana occur within sediments from Chubut Province, Patagonia, Argentina. Two prolific sites of fossil preservation, Palacio de los Loros and Parque Provincial Ormachea, sit near the top of the southwestern outcrops of the Danian (65.5-61.7 Ma) Salamanca Formation. Resting just above an unconformity spanning the K-T boundary, the Salamanca Fm. provides evidence of plant recovery after the extinction event and the depositional environments in which these floras existed. This thesis provides a sedimentological description and paleoenvironmental interpretation of the Salamanca and Banco Negro Inferior Fms. in their southwestern outcrops and places macroflora fossil localities in stratigraphic context. The Salamanca Fm. in the area 25-40 km south of Sarmiento, Argentina consists of ten facies and four facies associations representing a transgression onto continental Cretaceous facies followed by regression and infilling of marine, tidal facies.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions for Use Mode D'emploi EQUATION of TIME Calibre 2120/2808 Selfwinding
    Instructions for use Mode d’emploi EQUATION OF TIM E Calibre 2120/2808 Selfwinding 12 13 1 5 11 14 d 2 7 e 9 6 f 10 8 4 3 B C A B C ENGLISH 1. Introduction p 49 5. Basic functions p 78 The Manufacture Audemars Piguet Setting the time Generality Time-zone adjustments Winding the watch 2. About time p 56 Adjusting the perpetual calendar indications Times-zones Corrections if the watch has stopped for less than 3 days The units of time English Corrections if the watch has stopped for more The calendars than 3 days The earth’s coordinates Procedure for corrections 1. Date, day, month and leap year 3. Watch description p 62 2. The moon phase Views of the movement 3. The day Movement technical data 4. Sunrise, sunset and the equation of time of contents Table Specificities 5. Setting the time Watch indications and functions 6. Accessories p 83 4. Watch indications p 66 Rotating presentation case The perpetual calendar Setting stylus The astronomical moon The time equation 7. Additional comments p 85 True noon and mean noon Indication of sunrise and sunset times 46 47 The Manufacture h Audemars Piguet Englis The Vallée de Joux : cradle of the watchmaker’s art n the heart of the Swiss Jura, around 50 kilometres I north of Geneva, nestles a landscape which has retained its natural charm to this day : the Vallée de Joux. Around the mid-18th century, the harsh Introduction 1. climate of this mountainous region and soil depletion drove the farming community settled there to seek other sources of income.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Patagonia & Central Chile
    WILD PATAGONIA & CENTRAL CHILE: PUMAS, PENGUINS, CONDORS & MORE! October 30 – November 16, 2018 SANTIAGO–HUMBOLDT EXTENSION: ANDES, WETLANDS & ALBATROSS GALORE! November 14-20, 2018 ©2018 Breathtaking Chile! Whether exploring wild Patagonia, watching a Puma hunting a herd of Guanaco against a backdrop of snow-capped spires, enjoying the fascinating antics of a raucous King Penguin colony in Tierra del Fuego, observing a pair of hulking Magellanic Woodpeckers or colorful friendly Tapaculos in a towering Southern Beech forest, or sipping fine wine in a comfortable lodge, this lovely, modern South American country is destined to captivate you! Hosteira Pehoe in Torres Del Paine National Park © Andrew Whittaker Wild Patagonia and Central Chile, Page 2 On this exciting new tour, we will experience the majestic scenery and abundant wildlife of Chile, widely regarded among the most beautiful countries in the world! From Santiago & Talca, in south- central Chile, to the famous Chilean Lake district, charming Chiloe Island to wild Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego in the far south, we will seek out all the special birds, mammals, and vivid landscapes for which the country is justly famous. Our visit is timed for the radiant southern spring when the weather is at its best, colorful blooming wildflowers abound, birds are outfitted in stunning breeding plumage & singing, and photographic opportunities are at their peak. Perhaps most exciting, we will have the opportunity to observe the intimate and poorly known natural history of wild Pumas amid spectacular Torres del Paine National Park, often known as the 8th wonder of the World! Chile is a wonderful place for experiencing nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas General Permit (GMG290000)
    FACT SHEET AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR THE PROPOSED REISSUANCE OF THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR NEW AND EXISTING SOURCES IN THE OFFSHORE SUBCATEGORY OF THE OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION POINT SOURCE CATEGORY FOR THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OF THE GULF OF MEXICO (GMG290000) April 7, 2017 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 1445 Ross Ave. Dallas, TX 75202 This page is intentionally left blank. GMG290000 Fact Sheet Page 1 FACT SHEET AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION I. Legal Basis Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act), 33 USC 1311(a), renders it unlawful to discharge pollutants to waters of the United States in the absence of authorizing permits. CWA section 402, 33 U.S.C. section 1342, authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to issue National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits allowing discharges on the condition they will meet certain requirements, including CWA sections 301, 304, 306, 401 and 403. Those statutory provisions require NPDES permits include effluent limitations for authorized discharges that: (1) meet standards reflecting levels of technological capability; (2) comply with EPA-approved state water quality standards; (3) comply with other state requirements adopted under authority retained by states under CWA section 510, 33 U.S.C. section 1370; and, (4) cause no unreasonable degradation to the territorial seas, waters of the contiguous zone, or the oceans. CWA section 301 requires compliance with "best conventional pollution control technology" (BCT) and "best available pollution control technology economically achievable" (BAT) no later than March 31, 1989. CWA section 306 requires compliance with New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) no later than the effective date of such standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Body of Knowledge 2006
    UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE Geographic Information Science and Technology Body of Knowledge 2006 Editors (2004-06) David DiBiase, managing editor Pennsylvania State University Michael DeMers Ann Luck New Mexico State University Pennsylvania State University Ann Johnson Brandon Plewe Environmental Systems Research Institute Brigham Young University Karen Kemp Elizabeth Wentz University of Redlands Arizona State University Model Curricula Task Force (1998-2003) Duane Marble, chair Ohio State University Linda Bischoff Donna Peuquet GE Network Systems Pennsylvania State University Aileen Buckley Jay Sandhu University of Oregon Environmental Systems Research Institute Michael DeMers Mandayam Srinivas New Mexico State University California State Polytechnic University at Ponoma Ann Johnson Elizabeth Wentz Environmental Systems Research Institute Arizona State University Karen Kemp Richard Wright University of Redlands San Diego State University Farrell Jones Arthur Getis (ex officio) Intergraph San Diego State University Carolyn Merry Lyna Wiggins (ex officio) Ohio State University San Diego State University BoK2006_DD_25Feb2006.doc © UCGIS 2006 Page 1 of 127 Body of Knowledge Advisory Board (2004-2006) Jochen Albrecht Mary Lou Larson University of Maryland University of Wyoming Luc Anselin Marguerite Madden University of Illinois University of Georgia Richard Aspinall Duane Marble Arizona State University Ohio State University Todd Bacastow Jeremy Mennis Pennsylvania State University Temple University Kate Beard-Tisdale
    [Show full text]
  • Mistletoes of North American Conifers
    United States Department of Agriculture Mistletoes of North Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station American Conifers General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-98 September 2002 Canadian Forest Service Department of Natural Resources Canada Sanidad Forestal SEMARNAT Mexico Abstract _________________________________________________________ Geils, Brian W.; Cibrián Tovar, Jose; Moody, Benjamin, tech. coords. 2002. Mistletoes of North American Conifers. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS–GTR–98. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 123 p. Mistletoes of the families Loranthaceae and Viscaceae are the most important vascular plant parasites of conifers in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Species of the genera Psittacanthus, Phoradendron, and Arceuthobium cause the greatest economic and ecological impacts. These shrubby, aerial parasites produce either showy or cryptic flowers; they are dispersed by birds or explosive fruits. Mistletoes are obligate parasites, dependent on their host for water, nutrients, and some or most of their carbohydrates. Pathogenic effects on the host include deformation of the infected stem, growth loss, increased susceptibility to other disease agents or insects, and reduced longevity. The presence of mistletoe plants, and the brooms and tree mortality caused by them, have significant ecological and economic effects in heavily infested forest stands and recreation areas. These effects may be either beneficial or detrimental depending on management objectives. Assessment concepts and procedures are available. Biological, chemical, and cultural control methods exist and are being developed to better manage mistletoe populations for resource protection and production. Keywords: leafy mistletoe, true mistletoe, dwarf mistletoe, forest pathology, life history, silviculture, forest management Technical Coordinators_______________________________ Brian W. Geils is a Research Plant Pathologist with the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Flagstaff, AZ.
    [Show full text]
  • QA Vol 33 No1 July2016
    VOLUME 33 | NUMBER 1 | JULY 2016 AUSTRALASIA VIII Southern Connection Congress Janet Wilmshurst, FRSNZ SHAPE update 33 | 1 1 AQUA BIANNUAL MEETING: Quaternary perspectives from the City of Sails AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND 5-9 DECEMBER 2016 OLD GOVERNMENT HOUSE, UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND AQUA 2016 includes: • Four exciting days of conference sessions • Mid-conference field trip to Auckland Volcanic Field sites and Waitakere Ranges • Conference dinner at Villa Maria Estate inside the Ihumatao volcanic maar • Post-conference field trips, 10-15 December 2016 Two post conference field trip TRIP 1: options are currently being planned, Kauri and the Quaternary (a loop around the sub-tropical Northland/Far and will be run according to level of North region starting and ending in Auckland; three nights in Bay of Islands, interest. two nights at Kai Iwi Lakes). The trip will focus on ancient kauri, changes in For further information, please ecology as seen in pollen records over interglacial-glacial scales, and coastal contact Andrew Lorrey barrier evolution from OIS5-present. ([email protected]). TRIP 2: Quaternary volcanism and environmental change (excursion south from Auckland through the Waikato, the central North Island and ending in Wellington; three nights in Taupo, two nights in Palmerston North). There will be a focus on Quaternary volcanism, tectonism, sedimentation, and climate. Stops will include the Taupo and Rotorua volcanic centres, glaciation in the Tongariro National Park, Napier/Hawkes Bay and the Kapiti-Horowhenua/ Wanganui Basin
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae A
    CURRICULUM VITAE A. BIODATA NAME: Olanike Kudirat ADEYEMO, PhD, FCVSN, FEnv, FAAS, FAS, FTWAS SEX: Female DATE OF BIRTH: 17th July 1970 MARITAL STATUS: Married NATIONALITY: Nigerian CONTACT ADDRESS: Fish and Wildlife Unit, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria TEL: +234-805-5454-544 E-MAIL: [email protected] [email protected] WEBSITE: http://vet.ui.edu.ng/OKAdeyemo GOOGLE SCHOLAR: http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=AbsyqJgAAAAJ&hl=en SCOPUS AUTHOR ID: 7003434760 ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3404-5090 LiveDNA 234.10354 -http://livedna.org/234.10354 WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olanike_Adeyemo B. UNIVERSITY EDUCATION (WITH DATES) • Ph.D (Aquatic Epidemiology and Toxicology), University of Ibadan, Nigeria (2005) • Masters Degree in Veterinary Public Health (MVPH), University of Ibadan, Nigeria (1998) • Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (D.V.M.), University of Ibadan, Nigeria (1994) C. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND DIPLOMAS • Fellow, College of Veterinary Surgeon, Nigeria (2013) • Registered Veterinary Surgeon (VCN Reg. No 2471) D. EMPLOYMENT WITH DATES/JOB EXPERIENCE EMPLOYMENT: 1. March 13, 2017 till Date: Pioneer Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research, Innovation and Strategic Partnerships), University of Ibadan, Ibadan. 2. October 2011 till Date: Professor, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 3. August 2013-July 2015: Schlumberger Foundation sponsored Visiting Scholar, Center for Human and Environmental Toxicology, Department of Physiological sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA 1 4. October 2008 till October 2011: Reader/Associate Professor, in the Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan. 5. October 2005 till October 2008, Senior Lecturer/Assistant Professor, in the Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
    [Show full text]
  • O Ce an E Ar Th
    OCEAN SOLUTIONS OCEANSOLUTIONS EARTH SOLUTIONS EARTHSOLUTIONS OCEANSOLUTIONS Ocean Solutions, Earth Solutions describes realistic, science-based solutions for protecting the ocean and thus the earth. The book’s 16 chapters present high-level ocean science research from the inaugural Esri® Ocean GIS Forum (2013) at Esri headquarters in Redlands, California. It is written for an audience of government decision-makers, ocean and EARTHSOLUTIONS coastal science researchers, GIS practitioners, state and local coastal zone J.Dawn Wright managers, and students of these topics. The book showcases GIS best practices from more than 50 contributing authors and includes digital story Edited by maps, based on the Esri Story Map™ app, and additional online resources. It is edited by Esri Chief Scientist Dawn J. Wright, and the foreword is by oceanographer David G. Gallo, Director of Special Projects for the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Ocean Solutions, Earth Solutions provides solutions, underpinned by good, digestible science, for protecting the ocean while ensuring our safety on Earth; managing and mitigating conflict among multiple, simultaneous uses of the ocean; geodesigning the seas; and discovering and exploring a part of the planet still less well known than the moon, Mars, or Venus. Additional data and resources for this book are available on the Esri Press “Book Resources” webpage at esripress.esri.com/bookresources. Edited by Dawn J. Wright 138070 NEEDLOTNUMBER Printed in the USA Foreword by David G. Gallo OCEANSOLUTIONS EARTHSOLUTIONS Edited by Dawn J. Wright Foreword by David G. Gallo Cover image by Datacraft Co. Ltd./Getty Images. Cover image by EXTREME-PHOTOGRAPHER/Getty Images. Esri Press, 380 New York Street, Redlands, California 92373-8100 Copyright © 2015 Esri All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Regulations Require and How Decommissioning Differs
    What the Regulations Require and How Decommissioning Differs Between the Pacific and Gulf of Mexico LSU Journal of Energy Law and Resources Decommissioning Symposium February 15, 2019 1 Agenda u Offshore Federal Jurisdiction u Offshore Well, Platforms and Pipelines u Decommissioning Obligations & Regulations u Gulf of Mexico & Pacific OCS Regions u Idle Iron u Decommissioning Project Execution u Rigs to Reef Decommissioning Option u Final Results u Questions 2 Offshore Federal Jurisdiction 3 Government Controlled Offshore Lands United States - Exclusive Economic Zone (3 Billion Acres – 4.1 Million Sq. Miles) Source: DOI Source: BOEM Offshore Jurisdiction Source: Dept. of Interior Source: DOI Offshore Wells, Platforms and Pipelines 6 Shallow Water Three Pile Platform Multi-Platform Complex 7 Deepwater Semi-Submersible Production Platform Deepwater Production System Layout Deep Draft Semi-Submersible Facility with Subsea Wells Field 1 Field 2 Decommissioning Obligations and Regulations 10 Decommissioning Obligations u Decommissioning is the process of ending offshore oil and gas operations at an offshore platform and returning the ocean and seafloor to its pre-lease condition. u The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) and implementing regulations establish decommissioning obligations to which an operator must commit when they sign an offshore lease under the OCSLA, including the requirement to apply for and obtain a permit for subsequent removal of platforms. u Outer Continental Shelf leases typically require the operator to remove seafloor obstructions, such as offshore platforms, within one year of lease termination, or prior to termination of the lease if either the operator or the Department of the Interior deems the structure unsafe, obsolete, or no longer useful for operations (Idle Iron).
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Continental Shelf: Debate Over Oil and Gas Leasing and Revenue Sharing
    Outer Continental Shelf: Debate Over Oil and Gas Leasing and Revenue Sharing Updated April 3, 2009 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33493 Outer Continental Shelf: Debate Over Oil and Gas Leasing and Revenue Sharing Summary Oil and gas leasing in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) has been an important issue in the debate over energy security and domestic energy resources. The Department of the Interior (DOI) released a comprehensive inventory of OCS resources in February 2006 that estimated reserves of 8.5 billion barrels of oil and 29.3 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of natural gas. Another 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 tcf of natural gas are classified as undiscovered resources. Congress had imposed moratoria on much of the OCS since 1982 through the annual Interior appropriation bills. A Presidential Directive issued by President George H.W. Bush in 1990 (and extended by President Clinton until 2012) also banned offshore oil and gas development in much of the OCS. Proponents of the moratoria contend that offshore drilling would pose unacceptable environmental risks and threaten coastal tourism industries. However, on June 18, 2008, President Bush announced his support for lifting the moratoria on offshore oil and gas development. However, President Bush said that he would not lift the executive ban until Congress acted to lift its ban first. But, on July 14, 2008, President Bush reversed his position and lifted the executive ban on the OCS before Congress acted. Congressional action approving the Continuing Appropriations Act for FY2009 (P.L. 110-329, enacted September 30, 2008), continued the funding of government activities through March 6, 2009, or until a regular appropriations bill is enacted, omitted language that provided for the congressional OCS moratoria along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.
    [Show full text]