Vulnerability of Illinois Nature Preserves to Potential Ground-Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vulnerability of Illinois Nature Preserves to Potential Ground-Water Contract Report 612A Vulnerability of Illinois Nature Preserves to Potential Ground-Water Contamination Volume II: Selected Site Data from Vulnerability Assessments and Sensitivity Classifications by Randall A. Locke II Illinois State Water Survey Richard C. Berg Illinois State Geological Survey Mary J. Mushrush Illinois State Geological Survey Prepared for the Illinois Nature Preserves Commission November 1997 Illinois State Water Survey Hydrology Division Champaign, Illinois A Division of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources Vulnerability of Illinois Nature Preserves to Potential Ground-Water Contamination Volume II: Selected Site Data from Vulnerability Assessments and Sensitivity Classifications by Randall A. Locke II, ISWS Richard C. Berg, ISGS Mary Mushrush, ISGS with contributions from H. Allen Wehrmann, ISWS Michael V. Miller, ISGS Daniel C. Barnstable, ISGS Madalene Tierney Cartwright, ISGS Scott C. Meyer, ISWS Final report prepared for the Illinois Nature Preserves Commission November 1997 CONTENTS Page VOLUME II: Selected Site Data from Vulnerability Assessments and Sensitivity Classifications APPENDICES H. GIS Analysis of Sensitivities of Nature Preserves Where Vulnerability Assessments Were Not Made 1 I. Output of Vulnerability Assessment Data from the GROVA Database and Representative Geologic Columns 11 Almond Marsh 18 Armin Krueger Speleological 22 Baker's Lake 26 Barber Fen 30 Barrington Bog 36 Bates Fen 40 Bennett's Terraqueous Gardens 45 Bluff Springs 50 Bonnie's Prairie 54 Braidwood Dunes and Savanna 58 Calamus Lake 64 Cedar Lake Bog : 68 Chauncey Marsh 74 Churchill Prairie 79 Cotton Creek Marsh 83 Cranberry Slough 88 Cretaceous Hills 92 Dean Hills 96 Elizabeth Lake 101 Exner Marsh 107 Farm Trails North 112 Ferson's Creek 117 Fogelpole Cave 121 Forest Glen Seep 125 Fox River Fen 130 Franklin Creek 135 Gavin Bog and Prairie 140 i Page APPENDICES (continued) I. Output of Vulnerability Assessment Data from the GROVA Database and Representative Geologic Columns (continued) Gensburg-Markham Prairie 147 George B. Fell 151 Glacial Park 157 Gladstone Fen 162 Goose Lake Prairie 168 Hanover Bluff 174 Heron Pond-Little Black Slough 179 Horseshoe Bottom 183 Horseshoe Lake 187 Howard's Hollow Seep 191 Illinois Beach 196 Julia M. and Royce L. Parker Fen 200 Kettle Moraine 205 Kinnikinnick Creek 211 Kishwaukee Fen 216 Lake in the Hills Fen 221 Lake Renwick Heron Rookery 227 La Rue Swamp 233 Lockport Prairie 237 Long Run Seep 242 Lyon's Prairie and Marsh 247 Maramech Woods 253 Massac Forest 258 Matanzas Prairie 262 Mermet Swamp 267 Miller Shrub Swamp 271 Miller-Anderson Woods 275 Momence Wetlands 281 Nelson Lake Marsh 285 North Dunes 289 Oakwood Hills Fen 293 Palos Fen 299 Pecatonica Bottoms 303 Pine Rock 308 ii Page APPENDICES (concluded) I. Output of Vulnerability Assessment Data from the GROVA Database and Representative Geologic Columns (concluded) Pistakee Bog 313 Rockton Bog 320 Romeoville Prairie 325 Sand Ridge 331 Searls Park Prairie 335 Section 8 Woods 340 Shick Shack Sand Pond 344 Skokie River 348 Spring Bay Fen 352 Spring Bluff 356 Spring Grove Fen 360 Spring Lake 365 Thornton-Lansing Road 369 Trout Park 374 Tucker-Millington Fen 379 Turner Lake Fen 384 Volo Bog 389 Wadsworth Prairie 394 Wauconda Bog 398 Weingart Road Sedge Meadow 403 Wilkinson-Renwick Marsh 409 Wilmington Shrub Prairie 414 Windfall Prairie 420 Wolf Road Prairie 424 iii APPENDIX H: GIS Analysis of Sensitivities of Nature Preserves Where Vulnerability Assessments Were Not Made (grouped by preserve sensitivity) 1 Maps of Illinois delineating soil associations and geologic materials in the upper 50 feet were used to produce a composite map (Figure 2 in Volume I). The composite map, which is described in detail in Volume I, shows the sensitivity of shallow ground water to contamination and was used to predict the sensitivity of individual preserves and surrounding areas. This was accomplished by overlaying the sensitivity map with maps of the nature preserve boundaries and the boundaries of surrounding areas. GIS analyses of 85 preserves and surrounding areas are presented in Appendix A (Volume I). At these sites, local geology, hydrology and land use were assessed to determine the site vulnerability to surface and ground-water contamination. GIS analyses presented in this appendix are for sites that were on the nature preserve boundary map, but were not visited by a field crew for a vulnerability assessment. The sensitivity map is an appropriate tool for: 1) statewide or regional prioritization efforts and 2) screening evaluations of individual locations (e.g., nature preserves). One use of this information would be to determine which sites should undergo vulnerability assessments next. In any situations that require highly accurate predictions of preserve sensitivity, additional site-specific soils and geologic information should be collected and used. 2 INPC Nature Preserve Name Preserve Sensitivity Sensitivity of Surrounding Area No. (percent of total area*) (percent of total area*) VH H M L DL sw VH H M L DL SW SL 44 Beach Cemetery Prairie 100 100 178 Berryville Shale Glade 100 97 3 118 Brookville Lutheran Cemetery 100 100 Prairie 179 Brown Barrens 100 100 201 Carl & Claire Marie Sands - Main 100 86 14 St. Prairie 90 Cary (Junior High) Prairie 100 64 Freeport Prairie 100 81 19 30 Fults Hill Prairie 100 67 Grant Creek Prairie 100 100 94 Hartley Memorial 100 100 29 Henry Allan Gleason 100 100 101 Julius J. Knobeloch Woods 100 81 19 15 Kanakakee River 100 100 95 Laona Heights 100 72 9 19 176 Long Branch Sand Prairie 100 87 13 41 Mississippi River Sand Hills 100 87 13 52 Ozark Hills 100 100 *Percent of total area: VH = Very High, H = High, M = Moderate, L= Limited, DL = Disturbed Land, SW = Surface Water, SL = Slivers INPC Nature Preserve Name Preserve Sensitivity Sensitivity of Surrounding Area No. (percent of total area*) (percent of total area*) VH H M L DL SW VH H M L DL SW SL 74 Pere Marquette 100 91 5 3 45 Revis Hill Prairie 100 100 121 Sagawau Canyon 100 54 46 22 Sand Prairie-Scrub Oak 100 91 9 140 Stemler Cave Woods 100 69 31 154 Tomlin Timber 100 100 116 Wirth Prairie 100 100 143 Meredosia Hill Prairie 98 2 61 39 8 Salt Creek Woods 96 4 63 14 23 99 Lloyd's Woods 95 5 52 32 15 174 Harper-Rector Woods 92 8 63 37 87 William & Emma Bohm 88 12 37 28 33 1 Memorial 180 McClure Shale Glade 87 13 56 44 192 John M. Olin 85 15 71 28 2 69 Carpenter Park 82 18 67 33 109 Wier Hill Prairie 79 21 43 57 200 Sentinel 74 13 12 31 35 34 *Percent of total area: VH = Very High, H = High, M = Moderate, L= Limited, DL = Disturbed Land, SW = Surface Water, SL = Slivers INPC Nature Preserve Name Preserve Sensitivity Sensitivity of Surrounding Area No. (percent of total area*) (percent of total area*) VH H M L DL SW VH H M L DL SW SL 86 Douglas A. Wade Prairie 61 39 32 28 33 7 18 Starved Rock 53 39 3 3 2 37 36 12 3 11 82 Macarthur Woods 52 30 18 27 42 31 40 Edward L. Ryerson 50 32 18 55 16 28 124 Pecumsaugan Creek/Blackball 50 50 45 55 Mine 125 Black Hawk Forest 100 24 60 14 3 169 Forest Park South 100 19 62 20 160 Green Lee Cemetery Prairie 100 61 39 182 Grubb Hollow Prairie 100 1 71 24 4 46 Harlem Hills 100 28 72 112 Munson Township Cemetery 100 100 Prairie 63 Myer Woods 100 100 68 Norris 100 40 41 19 149 Plum Grove 100 100 170 Robinson Park Hill Prairies 100 1 91 8 144 Witter's Bob Town Hill Prairie 100 100 13 Forest Park 2 98 *Percent of total area: VH = Very High, H = High, M = Moderate, L= Limited, DL = Disturbed Land, SW = Surface Water, SL = Slivers INPC Nature Preserve Name Preserve Sensitivity Sensitivity of Surrounding Area No. (percent of total area*) (percent of total area*) VH H M L DL SW VH H M L DL SW SL 17 George S. Park Memorial Woods 95 5 65 35 100 Harper's Woods 88 12 29 45 26 145 Burton Cave 66 34 5 41 55 3 Busse Forest 46 54 46 53 1 97 Severson Dells 46 54 70 20 11 49 Baber Woods 100 2 98 75 Belmont Prairie 100 95 5 92 Brownlee Cemetery Prairie 100 100 159 Byler Cemetery Savanna 100 34 45 21 157 Bystricky Prairie 100 66 34 191 Carl Flierman's River 100 100 104 Cave Creek Glade 100 43 57 62 Colored Sands Bluff 100 33 67 85 CreveCoeur 100 1 96 3 147 Denby Prairie 100 21 79 142 Fairchild Cemetery Savanna 100 2 85 13 162 Foley Sand Prairie 100 3 97 136 Funks Grove 100 77 23 *Percent of total area: VH = Very High, H = High, M = Moderate, L= Limited, DL = Disturbed Land, SW = Surface Water, SL = Slivers INPC Nature Preserve Name Preserve Sensitivity Sensitivity of Surrounding Area No. (percent of total area*) (percent of total area*) VH H M L DL sw VH H M L DL SW SL 139 Glenbrook No. High School 100 100 Prairie 175 Gooseberry Island 100 85 15 55 Halesia 100 10 82 9 141 Hooper Branch Savanna 100 3 97 137 Manito Prairie 100 100 60 Margery C. Carlson 100 88 10 2 39 Marion Co. Prairie Chicken 100 100 Sanctuary 114 Massasauga Prairie 100 100 171 Mehl's Bluff 100 28 72 73 Morton Grove Prairie 100 100 187 Parklands 100 5 95 172 Racoon Grove 100 100 79 Reed-Turner Woodland 100 100 152 Roberts Cemetery Prairie 100 82 18 48 Round Bluff 100 100 33 Russell M.
Recommended publications
  • Scouts Trail Information
    There may be no better place to bicycle than in Illinois. From flat prairie land, to rolling hills, to towering bluffs, to breathtaking river and lakefront views-- Illinois has it all. If you haven't been on a bicycle lately, you don't know what you are missing. Hop on and take in some of the best scenery Mother Nature has to offer! Illinois is bringing more trails to you. A multi-million dollar initiative approved a few years ago continues to expand existing trails and create new ones. Here are just a few of the numerous opportunities that await you. Included are only those trails that are separated from streets and highways. Enjoy and have a safe trip! Location Length/ Intensity Other Trail and Setting Miles Surface of Use Activities 1 North Branch Bicycle Trail N. Branch Skokie Division Cook Co. FPD 20.1 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) (Wooded floodplain) skiing 2 Salt Creek Bicycle Trail Bemis Woods to Brookfield Zoo (Wooded 6.6 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) floodplain) skiing 3 Thorn Creek Bicycle Trail Thorn Creek Division Cook Co. FPD (Wooded 4.8 loop & 3.0 Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) floodplain) linear skiing 4 Busse Woods Bicycle Trail Ned Brown Forest Preserve (Wooded floodplain) 11.2 loop Paved Heavy Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) skiing 5 Arie Crown Bicycle Trail Arie Crown Forest Preserve (Wooded floodplain) 3.2 loop Limestone Moderate Hiking, jogging, X-C (Cook County) screenings skiing 6 I & M Canal Bicycle Trail Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • River Mileages and Drainage Areas for Illinois Streams—Volume 2, Illinois River Basin
    RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE AREAS FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS—VOLUME 2, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 79-111 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE AREAS FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS—VOLUME 2, ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN By R. W. Healy U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 79-111 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1979 CONTENTS Conversion Table . .iv Abstract . .1 Introduction . .1 Methods . .2 Explanation of tables . .2 References . .3 Index . .291 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing Illinois counties . .4 2. Map showing stream systems, hydrologic units, and major cities in Illinois. .6 TABLE Table 1. River mileages and drainage areas for Illinois streams . .8 i CONVERSION TABLE Multiply inch-pound unit By To obtain SI (metric) unit mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2) iv RIVER MILEAGES AND DRAINAGE FOR ILLINOIS STREAMS— Volume 2, Illinois River Basin By R. W. Healy ABSTRACT River mileages are presented for points of interest on Illinois streams draining 10 square miles or more. Points of interest include bridges, dams, gaging stations, county lines, hydrologic unit boundaries, and major tributaries. Drainage areas are presented for selected sites, including total drainage area for any streams draining at least 100 square miles. INTRODUCTION Expansion of water-resource investigations within the State of Illinois has amplified the need for a common index to locations on streams. A common index would aid in the coordination of various stream-related activities by facilitating data collection and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Can't Wait
    Freight Can’t Wait Third Edition A list of America’s most critical infrastructure projects About the Coalition The Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC) is a diverse coalition of more than 60 public and private organizations dedicated to increasing federal investment in America’s multimodal freight infrastructure. In contrast to single mode interests, CAGTC’s main mission is to promote a seamless goods movement transportation system across all modes to enhance capacity tradecorridors.org and economic growth. For more information on the Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors, please visit 202.828.9100 www.tradecorridors.org. @CAGTC Freight Can’t Wait. Freight transportation is the backbone of America’s commerce. It is an economic engine, producing millions of jobs and a higher standard of living for our population. Without the ability to quickly and cost effectively move goods, American businesses struggle to remain competitive and the overall health of the economy suffers. A campaign of strategic investment to expand capacity and increase efficiency is needed to maintain – and grow – U.S. productivity and global competitiveness. This book contains a snapshot of freight projects that stand to benefit from federal partnership and investment. Federal support, in the form of a freight-specific competitive grant program, can incentivize states and localities to finance creatively and make use of public-private partnerships. Direct federal investment can leverage the state, local and private dollar, serving as the final piece in a funding package, and make projects like those in Freight Can’t Wait a reality. Third Edition April 2019 CAGTC | Freight Can’t Wait 1 West CAGTC | Freight Can’t Wait 3 Benefits Alameda Corridor-East The project would eliminate crossing collisions, queu- ing and congestion and reduce vehicle emissions at Project the underpass while the corridor improvements would improve safety at all four crossings in Montebello.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 19 May 7, 2010 Pages 6270-6557
    Volume 34,Issue 19 May 7, 2010 Pages 6270-6557 i TABLE OF CONTENTS May 7, 2010 Volume 34, Issue 19 PROPOSED RULES NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF Raccoon, Opossum, Striped Skunk, Red Fox, Gray Fox, Coyote and Woodchuck (Groundhog) Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 550....................................................................6270 Muskrat, Mink, Raccoon, Opossum, Striped Skunk, Weasel, Red Fox, Gray Fox, Coyote, Badger, Beaver and Woodchuck (Groundhog) Trapping 17 Ill. Adm. Code 570....................................................................6282 Dove Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 730....................................................................6293 Crow, Woodcock, Snipe, Rail and Teal Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 740....................................................................6310 Crossbow and Standing Vehicle Hunting Authorizations 17 Ill. Adm. Code 760....................................................................6324 Illinois List of Endangered and Threatened Fauna 17 Ill. Adm. Code 1010..................................................................6328 REVENUE, DEPARTMENT OF Income Tax 86 Ill. Adm. Code 100....................................................................6339 ADOPTED RULES CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF Reports of Child Abuse and Neglect 89 Ill. Adm. Code 300....................................................................6373 NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF Sport Fishing Regulations for the Waters of Illinois 17 Ill. Adm. Code 810....................................................................6391
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Ecology and Change in Terrestrial Ecosystems 35
    Chapter 4—Vegetation Ecology and Change in Terrestrial Ecosystems 35 CHAPTER 4 Vegetation Ecology and Change in Terrestrial Ecosystems John B. Taft1, Roger C. Anderson2, and Louis R. Iverson3 with sidebar by William C. Handel1 1. Illinois Natural History Survey 2. Department of Biology, Illinois State University 3. USDA Forest Service OBJECTIVES What are the major vegetation types that have occurred in Illinois and how have they changed since the last ice age and more specifically since European-Americans settled the region? Ecological factors influencing trends, composition, and diversity in prairie, savanna, open woodland, and forest communities are examined. Historical and contemporary changes will be explored with reference to the proportion and characteristics of habitats remaining in a relatively undegraded condition. While Illinois is a focus for this chapter, the processes and factors explaining vegetational variation have relevance to the entire Midwest and in many cases beyond. INTRODUCTION key step in conserving biodiversity. The following chapter explores the dominant types of native terrestrial vegetation Vegetation change is a major focus of ecological monitoring and changes as they have occurred in Illinois primarily since and research and has both temporal and spatial aspects. Of Pleistocene glaciation with a focus on the post-European course, all change is measured through time. Change can settlement period. be evaluated on a time scale of thousands of years, such as following Pleistocene glaciation, or in the time frame of an In thE FOrMEr tIME annual species. An example of a spatial aspect of vegetation The last glacial episode, known as Wisconsinan glaciation, change is the emergence of forest where once prairie covered the northeastern quarter of Illinois from about occurred (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Falcons of Coles County, Illinois 14
    MeadowlarkSUMMER/FALL 2017 Prairie Falcons of Coles County, Illinois 14 2017 IORC Report 7 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Field Notes 21 Field Notes 46 Meadowlark PRESIDENT’S LETTER PUBLISHED BY Illinois Ornithological Society Anyone who has done a bit of bird watching on the western shore of Lake Michigan during fall migration knows that your success is very often weather EDITORIAL TEAM dependent. In fact, the best weather days (think sunny and calm) aren’t necessarily the best birding days at all. Warm sunny weather entices more people outside CHIEF EDITOR often with their kids and pets in tow. Better get up early or you’ll hear stories Eric Secker from fellow birders how dogs chased off a flock of graceful American Avocets from ASSISTANT EDITORS the beach or runners flushed an unexpected Upland Sandpiper moments before Tamima Itani, Adam Sell you arrived. There’s nothing more frustrating than missing a good bird by a few PRESIDENT & CHIEF SUPERVISOR minutes. Believe me. I’ve been there many times. Matt Igleski Experienced birders don’t mind getting up early or even braving the elements, LAYOUT AND PRODUCTION but it’s not just about trying to beat the crowd. Knowing how the weather may Eric Secker affect migration and bird activity improves your chances at finding certain species or of having a productive outing in general. FIELD NOTES EDITORS There’s probably one condition where you might as well pack it in for the Jill Anderson Matt Hayes day and that’s heavy rain. In a torrential downpour, you won’t be able to see or Dan Williams even keep your optics dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Study Users
    The Federal Emergency Management Agency in Cooperation with DuPage County, Illinois Presents: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY A Report of Flood Hazards in: DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND INCORPORATED AREAS Prepared, in parts, by: FEMA Region V Nika Engineering 536 South Clark Street 421 Mill Street Chicago, Illinois 60605 and Batavia, Illiois 60510 March 2007 1 7043CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: December 4, 1985 Revised Countywide FIS Date: June 16, 2004 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY DuPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Purpose of Study 1 1.2. Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3. Coordination 5 1.4. Regional Participation and Progress 7 2. AREA STUDIED 8 2.1. Scope of Study 8 2.2. Community Description 8 2.3. Watershed Description 8 2.3.1. DesPlaines River (DP) 9 2.3.1.1. Geographical Description 9 2.3.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreational Needs & the Hunter Lake Opportunity Illinois
    Outdoor Recreational Needs & The Hunter Lake Opportunity Illinois Department of Natural Resources December 3, 2018 Introduction In 2015, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) entered into agreement with the City of Springfield to manage city-owned property surrounding the City’s proposed secondary water supply (Hunter Lake). The City has already acquired 7,138 acres for the project located in southeastern Sangamon County. The lake is expected to cover 2,560 surface-acres with water. Outdoors recreation generates about $32 billion in economic activity each year for the State of Illinois, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. All this activity supports 90,000 jobs statewide. As the population of the United States continues its gradual migration from rural to urban areas (U.S. Census Bureau), demand for recreational land, open space and hunting and fishing opportunities will continue to grow. With 95 percent of Illinois land in private hands, the state ranks 46th in terms of land in public ownership. The IDNR owns and manages about 480,000 acres. The partnership between the City and IDNR is intended to provide additional public access for outdoor recreation, education and habitat conservation on Hunter Lake and its surrounding area. The City concluded the IDNR is the appropriate state agency to help the City achieve this objective. IDNR has statutory authority to manage the state’s fish and wildlife resources. To this end, the City chose to enter a Memorandum of Cooperation with IDNR (Appendix A) and tasked the Agency with managing the property’s outdoors potential for recreational opportunity, including hunting, fishing, bird-watching, biking, hiking and camping.
    [Show full text]
  • DATA by CLASSIFICATION Page Land & Water Acreage Leased
    State of Illinois Illinois Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Report Report Cover Table of Contents Land & Water Leased Water DATA BY CLASSIFICATION Page Acreage Acreage Acreage* Pictured on the cover is Wise Ridge Bedrock Hill State Natural Area. Located in the State Parks 4 127,793.172 9,911.280 10,481.640 Shawnee Hills in Johnson County, this property is listed in the Illinois Natural Area Inventory for its high quality forest and limestone glades. More than a mile of the Conservation Areas 10 73,275.608 0.000 20,402.326 Tunnel Hill State Trail runs through this tract providing good public access. Fish Facilities 12 232.650 32.500 60.100 Natural Areas 13 44,631.941 0.000 3,869.200 Acquisition of this 555.845+/- acre tract allows IDNR to preserve a scenic, forested Fish and Wildlife Areas 26 94,542.623 73,384.180 8,627.290 corridor along the Tunnel Hill Trail consistent with statewide conservation and natural State Wildlife Areas 30 1,356.193 700.000 0.000 resource plans. Wise Ridge is in the Eastern Shawnee Conservation Opportunity Area Greenways and Trails 30 1,560.342 0.000 0.000 of Illinois Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan. The property is a mixture of State Memorials 31 0.100 0.000 0.000 steep, forested slopes, limestone barrens and a bottomland bordering Pond Creek, a Boating Access Areas 31 6.300 304.300 0.000 tributary of the South Fork of the Saline River. Expanded public recreational State Recreation Areas 31 3,955.015 9,300.000 16.800 opportunities will include hunting, wildlife observation and hiking trails.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: an Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 012 SE 046 389 AUTHOR Paige, John C. TITLE The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: An Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NPS-D-189 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 293p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Conservation (Environment); Employment Programs; *Environmental Education; *Federal Programs; Forestry; Natural Resources; Parks; *Physical Environment; *Resident Camp Programs; Soil Conservation IDENTIFIERS *Civilian Conservation Corps; Environmental Management; *National Park Service ABSTRACT The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) has been credited as one of Franklin D. Roosevelt's most successful effortsto conserve both the natural and human resources of the nation. This publication provides a review of the program and its impacton resource conservation, environmental management, and education. Chapters give accounts of: (1) the history of the CCC (tracing its origins, establishment, and termination); (2) the National Park Service role (explaining national and state parkprograms and co-operative planning elements); (3) National Park Servicecamps (describing programs and personnel training and education); (4) contributions of the CCC (identifying the major benefits ofthe program in the areas of resource conservation, park and recreational development, and natural and archaeological history finds); and (5) overall
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Crown: a Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park
    Protecting the Crown A Century of Resource Management in Glacier National Park Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (RM-CESU) RM-CESU Cooperative Agreement H2380040001 (WASO) RM-CESU Task Agreement J1434080053 Theodore Catton, Principal Investigator University of Montana Department of History Missoula, Montana 59812 Diane Krahe, Researcher University of Montana Department of History Missoula, Montana 59812 Deirdre K. Shaw NPS Key Official and Curator Glacier National Park West Glacier, Montana 59936 June 2011 Table of Contents List of Maps and Photographs v Introduction: Protecting the Crown 1 Chapter 1: A Homeland and a Frontier 5 Chapter 2: A Reservoir of Nature 23 Chapter 3: A Complete Sanctuary 57 Chapter 4: A Vignette of Primitive America 103 Chapter 5: A Sustainable Ecosystem 179 Conclusion: Preserving Different Natures 245 Bibliography 249 Index 261 List of Maps and Photographs MAPS Glacier National Park 22 Threats to Glacier National Park 168 PHOTOGRAPHS Cover - hikers going to Grinnell Glacier, 1930s, HPC 001581 Introduction – Three buses on Going-to-the-Sun Road, 1937, GNPA 11829 1 1.1 Two Cultural Legacies – McDonald family, GNPA 64 5 1.2 Indian Use and Occupancy – unidentified couple by lake, GNPA 24 7 1.3 Scientific Exploration – George B. Grinnell, Web 12 1.4 New Forms of Resource Use – group with stringer of fish, GNPA 551 14 2.1 A Foundation in Law – ranger at check station, GNPA 2874 23 2.2 An Emphasis on Law Enforcement – two park employees on hotel porch, 1915 HPC 001037 25 2.3 Stocking the Park – men with dead mountain lions, GNPA 9199 31 2.4 Balancing Preservation and Use – road-building contractors, 1924, GNPA 304 40 2.5 Forest Protection – Half Moon Fire, 1929, GNPA 11818 45 2.6 Properties on Lake McDonald – cabin in Apgar, Web 54 3.1 A Background of Construction – gas shovel, GTSR, 1937, GNPA 11647 57 3.2 Wildlife Studies in the 1930s – George M.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]