DOCSLIB.ORG

Consolidated Table of Treaties, Volumes 1-125 Edited by Elihu Lauterpacht, C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consolidated Table of Treaties, Volumes 1-125 Edited by Elihu Lauterpacht, C Cambridge University Press 0521807794 - International Law Reports: Consolidated Table of Treaties, Volumes 1-125 Edited by Elihu Lauterpacht, C. J. Greenwood, A. G. Oppenheimer and Karen Lee Excerpt More information CONSOLIDATED TABLE OF TREATIES VOLUMES 1—125 This table lists, in chronological order according to the date of signature, the treaties and other international agreements referred to in the decisions reported in volumes 1-125 of the Annual Digest and International Law Reports. It has not been possible to draw a useful distinction between treaties judicially considered and treaties which are merely cited. In the case of bilateral treaties, the names of the parties are given in alphabetical order. Names of countries follow contemporaneous usage except in the case of small spelling changes (e.g. Roumania/Romania) where modern usage is adopted throughout. Multilateral treaties are referred to by the name by which they are believed commonly to be known, e.g. Treaty of Versailles. References to texts of treaties have been supplied wherever possible, including usually at least one reference to a text in the English language. The full titles of the abbreviated references will be found in the list of abbreviations and sources at p. ix. For an index to the treaties by subject, see p. 315. 1217 Sept. 11 England–France, Treaty of Lambeth (ICJ Pleadings, The Minquiers and Ecrehos Case, vol. 1, 503 (extract); Rymer, Foedera, Rev. edn, vol. i, Part i, 148)......20, 98, 128-9 1259 May 20 England–France, Treaty of Paris (ICJ Pleadings, The Minquiers and Ecrehos Case, vol. 1, 142) ......20, 116, 118-19, 129-31 Art.4......20, 98, 118, 130 Art.6......20, 98, 130 Art.7......20, 130 1360 Oct. 24 England–France, Treaty of Calais (ICJ Pleadings, The Minquiers and Ecrehos Case, vol. 1, 144) ......20, 98, 118-19, 131-2 1420 May 21 England–France, Treaty of Troyes (ICJ Pleadings, The Minquiers and Ecrehos Case, vol. 1, 144) ......20, 99, 116, 120, 132 Art.22......20, 133 1471 Feb. 16 England–France, Truce of London (ICJ Pleadings, The Minquiers and Ecrehos Case, vol. 1, 601) ......20, 99 1494 June 7 Portugal–Spain, Treaty of Tordesillas (Encyc Brit (1969), vol. 20, 1094) . .....86, 204-5 1631 Sept. 17 France–Morocco, Treaty of Peace (ICJ Pleadings, Rights of US Nationals in Morocco Case, vol. 1, 417) ......19, 265 1 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521807794 - International Law Reports: Consolidated Table of Treaties, Volumes 1-125 Edited by Elihu Lauterpacht, C. J. Greenwood, A. G. Oppenheimer and Karen Lee Excerpt More information 2 TREATIES 1648–1707 1648 Jan. 30 Netherlands–Spain, Treaty of Peace (Munster)¨ (1 BFSP Part I, 577; 1 CTS 1)......4, 115, 75, 169 Oct. 24 France–Holy Roman Empire, Treaty of Munster¨ (Westphalia) (1 CTS 271; 6 Dumont, Part I, 450) ......31, 113 1654 Apr. 11/ Great Britain–Sweden, Treaty of Peace and Commerce (1 BFSP Part I, 691; May 9 2 Hertslet 310; 3 CTS 257) ......20, 554 1659 Nov. 7 France–Spain, Treaty of Peace (Pyrenees) (5 CTS 325; 6 Dumont, Part II, 264) ......31, 113 1661 Feb. 13 Denmark–Great Britain, Treaty of Peace and Commerce (1 BFSP Part I, 375; 1 Hertslet 179; 6 CTS 233) ......23, 321 Art.16......20, 554, 23, 313 Art.46......23, 321-2 Oct. 21 Great Britain–Sweden, Treaty of Peace and Commerce (1 BFSP Part I, 701; 2 Hertslet 324; 6 CTS 447) ......23, 321, 322 Art.6......23, 313 Art.8......20, 554 1667 May 13/23 Great Britain–Spain, Treaty of Peace and Friendship (1 BFSP Part I, 563; 2 Hertslet 140; 10 CTS 63) ......23, 321-2 Art.3......23, 313 1670 July 11 Denmark–Great Britain, Treaty of Peace and Commerce (1 BFSP Part I, 381; 1 Hertslet 186; 11 CTS 347) ......23, 321 Art.24......20, 554, 23, 313, 322, 24, 296 1682 Jan. 29 France–Morocco, Articles and Conditions of Peace (16 CTS 161; ICJ Plead- ings, Rights of US Nationals in Morocco Case, vol. 1, 423) ......19, 265 1686 Nov. 16 France–Great Britain, Treaty of Peace for a Neutrality in America (1 BFSP 423 (extract); 7 Dumont, Part II, 141; 1 Jenkinson 261; 18 CTS 83)......44, 365 1697 Sept. 20 France–Spain, Treaty of Peace (Ryswick) (21 CTS 453) ......73, 366 1706 Jan. 22 Treaty of Union between England and Scotland. See Act of Union between England and Scotland (16 January/6 March 1707) 1707 Jan. 16/ Act of Union between England and Scotland (Blackstone’s Statutes on Public Mar. 6 Law & Human Rights, 11th edn 10) ......59, 481-2 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521807794 - International Law Reports: Consolidated Table of Treaties, Volumes 1-125 Edited by Elihu Lauterpacht, C. J. Greenwood, A. G. Oppenheimer and Karen Lee Excerpt More information TREATIES 1713–1767 3 Art.III......124, 582 Art. XVIII ......124, 580, 591 Art.XIX......92, 635, 124, 580, 591, 593 Art. XXII ......124, 578-99 1713 Mar. 31/ France–Great Britain, Treaty of Peace and Friendship (Utrecht) (35 BFSP Apr. 11 815; 8 Dumont, Part I, 339; 1 RTAF 1; 27 CTS 475) ......27, 1-3, 31, 181 n., 78, 449, 82, 602, 604, 90, 302, 92, 673 Art. XIII ......82, 602-3, 604, 605, 95, 662, 104, 219 1721 Jan. 23 Great Britain–Morocco, Treaty of Peace (1 BFSP Part I, 428; 1 Hertslet 89; 31 CTS 281) . .....19, 265 1741 Jan. 29 Maratha (Ruler of)–Portugal, Treaty (ICJ Pleadings, Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territory, vol. 1, 293) ......24, 868, 31, 54, 95, 96 1750 Jan. 15 Great Britain–Morocco, Treaty of Peace (1 BFSP Part I, 433; 1 Hertslet 96)......19, 265 1751 Feb. 1 Great Britain–Morocco, Additional Articles of Peace and Commerce (1 BFSP Part I, 434; 1 Hertslet 97; 38 CTS 493) ......19, 265 1760 Mar. 24 France–Sardinia, Treaty concerning Boundaries and Jurisdiction (1 Traites´ 80; 42 CTS 401) . .....4, 91, 5, 69, 18, 290 July 28 Great Britain–Morocco, Treaty of Peace, Commerce and Navigation (4 Martens R, 1; 1 Martens R 2, 42; 1 BFSP Part I, 436; 1 Hertslet 100; 43CTS1)......19, 265 1762 Nov. 3 France, Great Britain, Spain, Preliminary Articles of Peace (1 Martens R 2, 92; 42 CTS 209) . .....31, 181 n. 1763 Feb. 10 France, Great Britain, Spain, Definitive Treaty of Peace (Paris) (1 Martens R, 33; 1 Martens R 2, 104; 15 RTAF 66; 1 BFSP Part 1, 422 (extract); 2 Hertslet 233 (extract); 42 CTS 279) . 7, 131, 31, 185, 73, 62, 113-14, 78, 426, 499, 82, 603, 604, 90, 302, 92, 673, 100, 315, 104, 219 Art.4......82, 603 Art.5......82, 603 Art.6......82, 603 Art.7......31, 180 n. 1767 May 28 Morocco–Spain, Treaty of Peace and Commerce (44 CTS 23; ICJ Pleadings, Western Sahara,vol.II,9)......59, 66-7, 104, 106, 158, 168 Art.18......59, 66-8, 104-5 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521807794 - International Law Reports: Consolidated Table of Treaties, Volumes 1-125 Edited by Elihu Lauterpacht, C. J. Greenwood, A. G. Oppenheimer and Karen Lee Excerpt More information 4 TREATIES 1779–1785 1779 May 4/ Maratha Empire–Portugal, Maratha Treaty (Third Treaty of Poona) (47 CTS Dec. 17 127; ICJ Pleadings, Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territory, vol. 1, 233; and for texts of the various drafts, ibid., pp. 228, 230, 236, 239) ......24, 852, 31, 36, 40-1, 50, 51, 77, 90, 91, 109, 115, 117 Art.17......24, 850, 859, 31, 50, 77-8, 86, 87 1782 Oct. 8 Netherlands–USA, Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (8 Stat 32; USTS 249; 2 US Treaties 1233; 48 CTS 137) ......31, 2-3 Nov. 30 Great Britain–USA, Preliminary Articles of Peace (2 Martens R, 308; 3 Martens R 2, 497; USTS 102; 2 Miller, Treaties 96; 48 CTS 223) ......10, 400 1783 Apr. 3 Sweden–USA, Treaty of Amity and Commerce (2 Martens R, 328; 7 Martens R, 52; 3 Martens R 2, 565; USTS 346; 2 Miller, Treaties 123; 48 CTS 269) ......6, 372 Art.6......5, 394 Art.7......6, 372 May 24 Great Britain–Morocco, Additional Articles of Friendship and Commerce (4 Martens R, 449; 3 Martens R 2, 611; 1 BFSP Part I, 444; 1 Hertslet 110; 48 CTS 327) ......2, 19 May 29 Maratha Empire–Portugal, Agreement (Sanad ) complementing Treaty of Poona, 1779 (ICJ Pleadings, Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territory,vol.1,37,38)......31, 77, 80, 90, 91 Sept. 3 France–Great Britain, Definitive Treaty of Peace and Friendship (Versailles) (48 CTS 437; 3 Martens R 2, 519; 1 Chalmers Collection 517; 1 BFSP Part I, 424 (Arts. 4, 5 and 6 only)) . 31, 181 n., 186, 82, 603-4, 95, 662, 666 Art.2......82, 603-4 Art.4......95, 666 Art.5......82, 604 Art.6......82, 604 Sept. 3 Great Britain–Spain, Definitive Treaty of Peace (Versailles) (48 CTS 481; 3 Martens R 2, 541; 2 Chalmers Collection 229; 1 BFSP Part I, 647 (Arts. 1, 2, 6 and 9 only)) ......100, 315 Sept. 3 Great Britain–USA, Definitive Treaty of Peace and Friendship (Versailles) (48 CTS 487; 2 Martens R, 497; 3 Martens R 2, 553; USTS 104; 2 Miller, Treaties 151; 1 US Treaties 586; 1 BFSP 779; 12 Bevans 8)......8, 51, 10, 32, 23, 464, 31, 178, 39, 110, 221, 330, 77, 673, 90, 211, 91, 430, 92, 673 Art.6......22, 598 1785 July 22 Maratha Empire–Portugal, Agreement (Sanad ) complementing Treaty of Poona, 1779 (Capitulations Relating to the Conditions of Transferof Nagar- Aveli to Portugal) (ICJ Pleadings, Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territory,vol.1,41,43)......31, 68, 77, 88, 90, 91, 109 Sept.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE Soviet Military Policy In
    NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE Soviet Military Policy in the Third World tnlit ..2.1'P.Oetbbei41976'4 T October 1975, the Soviets initiated an air and sealift from the USSR to help its client and in January 1976 began providing an airlift for Cuban forces between Cuba and Angola. 94. The Soviets evidently believe that the victory of a Soviet-supported national liberation movement has increased Soviet prestige in the Third World. The Soviets probably hope that Angola—where a substan- tial Cuban presence will probably remain for some [Omitted here is text unrelated to Africa.] time—may also assist the USSR in providing Soviets an entree to other national liberation movements in southern Africa—such as SWAPO. In October 1976 the Soviets signed a treaty of friendship and coopera- tion to consolidate their political position. In addition, they may hope to obtain access to port and air facilities as an alternative to those in Guinea. 95. Mozambique. Although not as extensive as that of the Chinese, Soviet aid in the form of military equipment, training, and funds assisted the Mozam- bique Liberation Front (FRELIMO) to come to power when Mozambique achieved independence in June 1975. FRELIMO will probably continue to receive substantial financial and military aid both from the USSR and the PRC. Mozambique provides training and base areas for guerrilla operations against - the white minority government of Rhodesia, an B. Africa activity to which the Soviets have given both military and political support. President Machel kept the 92. In absolute terms, Soviet military aid to sub- Soviets at arm's length immediately after independ- Saharan Africa is quite small.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Great Britain Entered the Great War Norman Simms La Salle University
    The Histories Volume 4 | Issue 2 Article 5 2019 Why Great Britain Entered the Great War Norman Simms La Salle University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Simms, Norman (2019) "Why Great Britain Entered the Great War," The Histories: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol4/iss2/5 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histories, Volume 4, Number 2 28 IV Why Great Britain Entered the Great War By Norman Simms Throughout the Twentieth Century and into the Twenty-First, many causes have been proposed for why Great Britain entered World War I (the Great War) on the side of France and Russia. Extensive research has indicated that the three most probable causes were the naval arms race, the German atrocities committed in occupied territories, and the violation of Belgium neutrality. Of these three, the violation of Belgium neutrality is most strongly supported as the ultimate reason why England committed itself militarily to the Entente. The book, “Twenty-Five Years” was written by Sir Edward Grey (official title: Viscount Grey of Fallodon, K.G.) who served as Secretary of Foreign Relations of Great Britain from 1892 tol895, again from 1905 to 1916, and died in 1933. Grey’s two- volume autobiography was first published in 1925 and focuses on the political and diplomatic aspects of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Principles and Practices of the Turmsh Foreign Policy Under Atatürk
    THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF THE TURMSH FOREIGN POLICY UNDER ATATÜRK YÜCEL GÜÇLÜ The fifteen years during which the Republican Turkey had been in existence under Kemal Atatürk's leadership were filled with an almost incredible activity in every field—including the foreign affairs. Few more surprising metamorphoses were recorded in history than the transformation which in the course of one decade and a half had changed old Turkey into a progressive modern country and a pillar of peace and stability in the Balkan Peninsula, in the eastern Mediterranean and in Western Asia. Turkey enjoyed the respect of all. No one dreamed of interfering in its internal affairs. Its neighbours, far from watching for opportunities to despoil it, were anxious to cultivate its friendship and they welcomed its co-operation in maintaining their common interests. Turkish diplomacy, in the period between the two world wars, wise and moderate as it showed itself, as well as vigorous and far-seeing, could not have accomplished so much if it had not been supported by radical reforms at home removing old shackles and inhibitions and opening the way for a tremendous revival of national energy and for a great development of national resources, both economic and cultural. The Turkish Constitution of 1924 had reserved a special foreign policy role to the President of the Republic. The President was well acquainted with the nation's diplomatic and security concerns. Atatürk had able lieutenants and devoted followers; but the realism and radicalism that marked Turkish foreign and internal policy since the foundation of the Republic were the fruit of his original genius.
    [Show full text]
  • Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870
    CONTEXTUAL RESEARCH IN LAW CORE VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Working Papers No. 2017-2 (August) Permanent Neutrality or Permanent Insecurity? Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870 Frederik Dhondt Please do not cite without prior permission from the author The complete working paper series is available online at http://www.vub.ac.be/CORE/wp Permanent Neutrality or Permanent Insecurity? Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870 Frederik Dhondt1 Introduction ‘we are less complacent than the Swiss, and would not take treaty violations so lightly.’ Baron de Vrière to Sylvain Van de Weyer, Brussels, 28 June 18592 Neutrality is one of the most controversial issues in public international law3 and international relations history.4 Its remoteness from the United Nations system of collective security has rendered its discussion less topical.5 The significance of contemporary self-proclaimed ‘permanent neutrality’ is limited. 6 Recent scholarship has taken up the theme as a general narrative of nineteenth century international relations: between the Congress of Vienna and the Great War, neutrality was the rule, rather than the exception.7 In intellectual history, Belgium’s neutral status is seen as linked to the rise of the ‘Gentle Civilizer of Nations’ at the end of the nineteenth century.8 International lawyers’ and politicians’ activism brought three Noble Peace Prizes (August Beernaert, International Law Institute, Henri La Fontaine). The present contribution focuses on the permanent or compulsory nature of Belgian neutrality in nineteenth century diplomacy, from the country’s inception (1830-1839)9 to the Franco- 1 Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), University of Antwerp, Ghent University/Research Foundation Flanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Death of an Institution: the End for Western European Union, a Future
    DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? EGMONT PAPER 46 DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? ALYSON JK BAILES AND GRAHAM MESSERVY-WHITING May 2011 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1785 7 D/2011/4804/136 U 1612 NUR1 754 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Passman on Defrance and Ulrich Pfeil, 'Der Élysée-Vertrag Und Die Deutsch-Französischen Beziehungen 1945-1963-2003'
    H-German Passman on Defrance and Ulrich Pfeil, 'Der Élysée-Vertrag und die deutsch-französischen Beziehungen 1945-1963-2003' Review published on Thursday, June 1, 2006 Corine Defrance, Ulrich Pfeil. Der Élysée-Vertrag und die deutsch-französischen Beziehungen 1945-1963-2003. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2005. 291 S. EUR 24.80 (cloth), ISBN 978-3-486-57678-8. Reviewed by Elana Passman (Department of History, Indiana State University)Published on H- German (June, 2006) Catalyst to Cooperation? The 1963 Elysée Treaty in France and Germany Three winters ago, the tricolor waved over Berlin--from the new French Embassy near the Brandenburg Gate (through which Napoleon had marched victorious in 1806) to the Siegessäule (built to commemorate the 1870 victory over the French). The previous day, a joint French-German parliamentary session took place at Versailles, where so many wars had been ended. January 22, 2003 marked the fortieth anniversary of the Elysée Treaty (often dubbed the Treaty of Friendship), signed by Konrad Adenauer and Charles de Gaulle in 1963. Fanfare in both Berlin and Paris demonstrated the desire to neutralize--and even appropriate--symbolic sites of the old enmity. Recasting lieux de mémoire has a long legacy in the post-1945 history of Franco-German relations, and the 2003 celebrations proved no exception. This volume, drawn from a 2003 conference at the Deutsches Historisches Institut-Paris and the Sorbonne, hinges on two basic and interrelated questions. First, did Franco-German reconciliation result from the state and its representatives (read great men), from big ideas or from civil society? Second, was the Elysée Treaty the cause or the result of reconciliation between the twoErbfeinde ? Throughout the work, a rigorous and balanced scrutiny of the treaty from multiple angles belies the apparent simplicity of these queries.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace of Paris (1783) 1 Peace of Paris (1783)
    Peace of Paris (1783) 1 Peace of Paris (1783) The Peace of Paris (1783) was the set of treaties which ended the American Revolutionary War. On 3 September 1783, representatives of King George III of Great Britain signed a treaty in Paris with representatives of the United States of America—commonly known as the Treaty of Paris (1783)—and two treaties at Versailles with representatives of King Louis XVI of France and King Charles III of Spain—commonly known as the Treaties of Versailles (1783). The previous day, a preliminary treaty had been signed with representatives of the States General of the Dutch Republic, but the final treaty which ended the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War was not signed until 20 May 1784; for convenience, however, it is included in the summaries below. The British lost their Thirteen Colonies and the defeat marked the end of the First British Empire. The United States gained more than it expected, thanks to the award of western territory.[1] The other Allies had mixed-to-poor results. France won a propaganda victory over Britain after its defeat in the Seven Years War, however its material gains were minimal and its financial losses huge. It was already in financial trouble and its borrowing to pay for the war used up all its credit and created the financial disasters that marked the 1780s. Historians link those disasters to the coming of the French Revolution. The Dutch did not gain anything of significant value at the end of the war. The Spanish had a mixed result; they did not achieve their primary war goal of recovering Gibraltar, but they did gain some territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.“Freemasonry As a Patriotic Society? the 1830 Belgian Revolution”
    REHMLAC. Revista de Estudios Históricos de la Masonería Latinoamericana y Caribeña E-ISSN: 1659-4223 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Maes, Anaïs “Freemasonry as a Patriotic Society? The 1830 Belgian Revolution” REHMLAC. Revista de Estudios Históricos de la Masonería Latinoamericana y Caribeña, vol. 2, núm. 2, -diciembre, 2010, pp. 1-17 Universidad de Costa Rica San José, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369537359001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative “Freemasonry as a Patriotic Society? The 1830 Belgian Revolution” Anaïs Maes Consejo Científico: José Antonio Ferrer Benimeli (Universidad de Zaragoza), Miguel Guzmán-Stein (Universidad de Costa Rica), Eduardo Torres-Cuevas (Universidad de La Habana), Andreas Önnerfors (University of Leiden), María Eugenia Vázquez Semadeni (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), Roberto Valdés Valle (Universidad Centroamericana “José Simeón Cañas”), Carlos Martínez Moreno (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), Céline Sala (Université de Perpignan) Editor: Yván Pozuelo Andrés (IES Universidad Laboral de Gijón) Director: Ricardo Martínez Esquivel (Universidad de Costa Rica) Dirección web: http://rehmlac.com/main.html Correo electrónico: [email protected] Apartado postal: 243-2300 San José, Costa Rica REHMLAC ISSN 1659-4223 2 Vol. 2, Nº 2, Diciembre 2010-Abril 2011 Fecha de recibido: 12 junio 2010 – Fecha de aceptación: 3 agosto 2010 Palabras clave Masonería, patriotismo, nacionalismo, revolución, Bélgica Keywords Freemasonry, patriotism, nationalism, revolution, Belgium Resumen Al cuestionar la masonería y el patriotismo, tenemos que conceptualizar el análisis de la evolución de la identidad patriótica.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Impactful Currency Systems for a Sustainable Economy in Switzerland
    4th International Conference on Social and Complementary Currencies Money, Consciousness and Values for Social Change: Real Experiences Swiss impact currency: improving impactful currency systems for a sustainable economy in Switzerland Christophe PLACE ▪ Antonin CALDERON ▪ Fabien CORDEIRO 10th of May 2017 Haute École de Gestion de Genève ▪ Geneva ▪ Switzerland Corresponding author: [email protected] 10th of May 2017 to 14th of May 2017 ▪ Barcelona ▪ Spain Parc Tecnològic Nou Barris ▪ Universitat Oberta de Catalunya http://ramics.org/barcelona2017/ ABSTRACT Switzerland has not only the oldest and biggest modern complementary currency in the world, the WIR created in 1934 with a transaction volume equivalent of CHF 1.5 billion Swiss francs representing 3.5% of Swiss franc currency circulation in 2008, but also the second cross-border complementary currency in the world, the Léman created in September 2015 in a Franco-Swiss conurbation with 80'000 units in circulation at par with Swiss franc and euro among a network of 350 organizations and 1'300 users in November 2016. Moreover, with about 44 social currencies, 14 complementary currencies, Switzerland, counts among reference case studies in the virtual, social and complementary currency systems domain. Nevertheless, some questions remain: (1) What is the historical, cultural, political and economical context of this innovation laboratory? (2) What is the relevant legislation to support such monetary innovation? (3) What are the genuine utility and impact of these currencies? To contribute to these research questions, a literature review and a research survey will allow us not only to overview the Swiss and the Greater Geneva currency systems, but also evaluate the interest of using complementary and virtual currency systems for a sustainable economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Compare and Contrast Congress of Vienna and Treaty of Versailles
    Compare And Contrast Congress Of Vienna And Treaty Of Versailles Lazar still sketch specifically while altern Marco cross-dresses that E-boat. When Wallace catenated his herplug Langton asphyxiated bitingly, not butplainly bulging enough, Waite is menstruateDennis dumfounding? unthoughtfully Sometimes or overtopped Rosicrucian acrimoniously. Purcell quacks Commenting on foreign relations between executive session of neuilly symbolised the president in its forms part diplomacy existed of treaty and american history to treaty subject to the age In the 127 Treaty of London the three powers agreed to reason their. Paris Peace Treaties failed to transcend a secure legal and. This worksheet encourages students to mean about the Congress of Vienna. In 1919 the powerful Four day in Paris to grieve the Treaty Lloyd George of Britain Vittorio Emanuele Orlando of Italy Georges Clemenceau of France and. Maintain peace and stability on the European continent known a the Congress of Vienna. Congress of Vienna several cities and boatmen's associations pressed claims for fool of. To sign it is required by congress and contrast of vienna. He went deranged. Of the Congress of Vienna signed by these major powers of Europe brought formal end worth the. Conventions like the London Protocol of 130 and the Berlin Congress of 17 would. This treaty termination accompanied by congress and vienna convention on transmittal to peace, only english lore, tablet or executive branch. AP European History Worthington Schools. The major powers Jean-Baptiste Duroselle during the Congress of Vienna in. PDF Comparison of Treaty of Versailles and congress. The bridge War Evaluating the intelligence of Versailles NEH.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty of Paris 1763
    Unit 5 How Did the Conflict End? What Were the Consequences? “Why don’t [the British] and French fight on the sea? [They] come here only to cheat the poor Indians, and take their land from them.” —Shamokin Daniel, a Delaware, 1758 6 Background for the Teacher Read the “How Did the Conflict End? What Were the Consequences?” section of the Teacher Background on the Activity in French and Indian War, pages 25-26. This Unit “Making Peace” The end of the war had a dramatic impact on each of the • This will help your groups who took part in it. This unit helps students understand students understand the the consequences of the end of the war for the French, the consequences of the end British, and the American Indians. of the conflict for each of the three groups who Key Teaching Points took part. They will use • Treaty of Paris 1763 what they have learned to negotiate a peace treaty. • Fort Pitt was constructed • Settlers moved west of the Allegheny Mountains • Amherst changed American Indian trade policy • American Indians united under Pontiac and the British forts fell • Bouquet battled the American Indians at Bushy Run • Royal Proclamation of 1763 • Trade policies changed and Pontiac’s War ended War club with steel blade 6 Winthrop Sargent. The History of an Expedition against Fort Duquesne in 1755. (Lewisburg, PA: Wennawoods Publishing, 1997), 101. Unit 5 How Did the Conflict End? What Were the Consequences? 79 Teacher Instructions Making Peace Standards This activity allows the students to evaluate the fairness of the peace process.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Diss Cover Page
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Daily Plebiscite: Political Culture and National Identity in Nice and Savoy, 1860-1880 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8dj2f20d Author Sawchuk, Mark Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Daily Plebiscite: Political Culture and National Identity in Nice and Savoy, 1860–1880 by Mark Alexander Sawchuk A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge Professor Carla Hesse, Chair Professor James P. Daughton Professor John Connelly Professor Jonah Levy Spring 2011 The Daily Plebiscite: Political Culture and National Identity in Nice and Savoy, 1860–1880 Copyright 2011 Mark Alexander Sawchuk Abstract The Daily Plebiscite: Political Culture and National Identity in Nice and Savoy, 1860–1880 by Mark Alexander Sawchuk Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Carla Hesse, Chair Using the French philosopher Ernest Renan’s dictum that the “nation’s existence is ... a daily plebiscite” as an ironic point of departure, this dissertation examines the contours of oppositional political culture to the French annexation of the County of Nice and the Duchy of Savoy in 1860. Ceded by treaty to France by the northern Italian kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia, these two mountainous border territories had long been culturally and geo-strategically in the French orbit. Unlike their counterparts in any other province of France, the inhabitants of the two territories were asked to approve or reject the annexation treaty, and thus their incorporation into France, in a plebiscite employing universal male suffrage.
    [Show full text]