DOCSLIB.ORG

Käkäpö and Allies Subfamily NESTORINAE: Käkä and Kea Nestorinae Bonaparte, 1849: Consp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Käkäpö and Allies Subfamily NESTORINAE: Käkä and Kea Nestorinae Bonaparte, 1849: Consp Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 249-251. Order PSITTACIFORMES: Cockatoos, Parrots and Parakeets New molecular data and analyses support a view that the two subfamilies Strigopinae and Nestorinae form a single clade basal to all other Recent members of the order Psittaciformes (e.g. de Kloet & de Kloet 2005, Astuti et al. 2006, Tokita et al. 2007, Wright et al. 2008). They therefore need to be put in a family of their own (rather than in Psittacidae, e.g. Checklist Committee 1990) placed ahead of Cacatuidae in the systematic list. The name Strigopidae G.R. Gray, 1848 has priority. Family STRIGOPIDAE: Käkäpö and Allies Subfamily NESTORINAE: Käkä and Kea Nestorinae Bonaparte, 1849: Consp. Syst. Ornith.: 1 – Type genus Nestor Lesson, 1830. Genus Nestor Lesson Nestor Lesson, 1830: Traité d’Ornith. 3: 190 – Type species (by monotypy) Nestor novaezelandiae Lesson, 1830 = Nestor meridionalis (Gmelin). Centrourus Swainson, 1837: Cabinet Cyclopaedia 92(2): 303 – Type species (by monotypy) Psittacus australis Shaw, 1792 = Nestor meridionalis (Gmelin). Centrurus Strickland, 1841: Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., London 7: 34. Unjustified emendation. Doreenia Mathews, 1930: Bull. Brit. Ornith. Club 50: 41 – Type species (by original designation) Nestor notabilis Gould. Endemic to the New Zealand region, including Norfolk Island. Fossil bones from the Chatham Islands are of uncertain specific and subspecific status. Nestor meridionalis (Gmelin) Kaka New Zealand. Two subspecies have been recognised on morphological and behavioural characters (Buller 1873, Higgins 1999), but recent molecular analyses using nuclear allozyme and microsatellite loci show very little genetic differentiation between them (Huggins 2001, Sainsbury 2004). Nestor meridionalis septentrionalis Lorenz North Island Kaka Nestor septentrionalis Lorenz, 1896: Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 46: 198 – North Island. Nestor meridionalis septentrionalis Lorenz; Checklist Committee 1953, Checklist N.Z. Birds: 53. North Island, from Mangamuka (Northland) to Rimutaka and Aorangi Ranges and on offshore islands (Hen and Chickens, Great Barrier (Aotea) and Hauturu / Little Barrier, Fanal (Motokino), Rakitu (Arid), Mayor (Tuhua) and Kapiti Islands). Straggles to isolated bush patches, sometimes to towns and cities and to other islands (e.g. Poor Knights and Mokohinau Islands). Common as a fossil throughout the North Island; common in middens, but seldom in large numbers. Nestor meridionalis meridionalis (Gmelin) South Island Kaka Psittacus meridionalis Gmelin, 1788: Syst. Nat., 13th edition 1(1): 333. Based on the “Southern Brown Parrot” of Latham 1781, Gen. Synop. Birds 1: 264 – Dusky Sound, Fiordland. Psittacus nestor Latham, 1790: Index Ornith. 1: 110 – Dusky Sound, Fiordland. Psittacus australis Shaw, 1792: Mus. Leverianum: 87 – Dusky Sound, Fiordland. Psittacus hypopolius J.R. Forster, 1794: Mag. merkwürdigen neuen Reise Beschreibungen 11(3): 313, footnote – New Zealand and Norfolk Island, restricted to Dusky Sound, Fiordland (fide Steinheimer et al. 2008, Notornis 55(1): 35). Psittacus (Kakadoe) nestor Latham; Kuhl 1820, Consp. Psittacorum: 86. Nestor Novae Zelandiae Lesson, 1830: Traité d’Ornith. 3: 191 – Dusky Sound, Fiordland. Nestor hypopolius Wagler, 1832: Abh. Kl. Bayer Akad. Wiss. 1: 505, 696 – Dusky Sound, Fiordland. Junior secondary homonym of Psittacus hypopolius J.R. Forster, 1794. Centrourus australis (Shaw); Swainson 1837, Cabinet Cyclopaedia 92(2): 303. Psittacus hypopolius J.R. Forster, 1844: in M.H.C. Lichtenstein, Descrip. Animalium: 72 – South Island. Junior primary homonym of Psittacus hypopolius J.R. Forster, 1794. Nestor australis (Shaw); G.R. Gray 1845, Gen. Birds 2: 426. Nestor Hypopolius (J.R. Forster); Bonaparte 1854, Revue Mag. Zool. 6 (2nd series): 155. Nestor Novae-Zelandiae Lesson; Bonaparte 1854, Revue Mag. Zool. 6 (2nd series): 155. Nestor Esslingii Souancé, 1856: Revue Mag. Zool. 8 (2nd series): 223 – “Philips Island”, probably error for Marlborough District (fide Mathews & Iredale 1913, Ibis 1 (10th ser.): 424). Nestor meridionalis (Gmelin); G.R. Gray, 1862: Ibis 4: 229. Nestor esslingii Souancé; G.R. Gray, 1862: Ibis 4: 230. Nestor superbus Buller, 1865: Essay N.Z. Ornith.: 11 – alpine districts of the South Island. Nestor montanus Finsch, 1868: Journ. für Ornith. 16: 242 – alpine heights of the South Island. Nestor occidentalis Buller, 1869: Ibis 5 (n. ser.): 40 – Westland. Nestor meridionalis var. esslingii Souancé; Buller 1888, History of the Birds of N.Z., 2nd edition 1: 152. Nestor esslingi Souancé; Buller 1905, Suppl. Birds N.Z. 2: 77. Unjustified emendation. Nestor meridionalis meridionalis (Gmelin); Checklist Committee 1953, Checklist N.Z. Birds: 54. South Island, Stewart Island / Rakiura and some offshore islands (e.g. D’Urville, Inner Chetwode, Bench, Codfish (Whenuahou) and Taukihepa / Big South Cape Islands). Chiefly west of the main divide and in Marlborough. Extends into Canterbury at lower mountain passes (e.g. Arthur’s Pass); also throughout the Southern Lakes District. An occasional straggler to coastal Canterbury and Otago. Common as a fossil throughout the South Island (Dawson 1952). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Play in Kaka (Nestor Meridionalis) with Comparisons to Kea (Nestor Notabilis)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences Papers in the Biological Sciences 2004 Social Play in Kaka (Nestor meridionalis) with Comparisons to Kea (Nestor notabilis) Judy Diamond University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Alan B. Bond University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibehavior Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons Diamond, Judy and Bond, Alan B., "Social Play in Kaka (Nestor meridionalis) with Comparisons to Kea (Nestor notabilis)" (2004). Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences. 34. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibehavior/34 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Behaviour 141 (2004), pp. 777-798. Copyright © 2004 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden. Used by permission. Social Play in Kaka (Nestor meridionalis) with Comparisons to Kea (Nestor notabilis) Judy Diamond University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Alan B. Bond School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Corresponding author—J. Diamond, [email protected] Summary Social play in the kaka (Nestor meridionalis), a New Zealand parrot, is described and contrasted with that of its closest relative, the kea (Nestor notabilis), in one of the first comparative studies of social play in closely related birds. Most play ac- tion patterns were clearly homologous in these two species, though some con- trasts in the form of specific play behaviors, such as kicking or biting, could be attributed to morphological differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Social Learning in a Wild Mountain Parrot, the Kea (Nestor Notabilis)
    Learning & Behavior 2004, 32 (1), 62-71 Testing social learning in a wild mountain parrot, the kea (Nestor notabilis) GYULA K. GAJDON, NATASHA FIJN, and LUDWIG HUBER University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Huber, Taborsky, and Rechberger (2001) reported an experiment in which the efficiency with which captive keas opened a complex food container was increased by observation of a skilled conspecific. However, only testing social learning in free-ranginganimals can demonstrate social learning in natural conditions. For that purpose, a tube-lifting paradigm was developed and testedon keas both in captivity and in Mount Cook National Park, New Zealand. The task was to remove a tube from an upright pole in order to gain access to a reward inside the tube. The top of the pole was higher than a standing kea, so that, to remove the tube, an individual had to simultaneously climb onto the pole and manipulate the tube up the pole with its bill. Because only 1 naive bird managed to remove a tube twice in 25 half- hour sessions and disappeared after success, another bird was trained to solve the task and to provide demonstrations for others. Even under such conditions, only 2 of at least 15 birds learned to remove the tube in 28 sessions. There was no indication that observer birds’ use of bill and feet when explor- ing the tube changed as the number of observations of tube removal increased in a way that would, in principle, increase the likelihood of tube removal. The results suggest a dissociation of social learning potential as assessed in laboratory animals, and social transmission of foraging techniques in natural populations.
    [Show full text]
  • According to Dictionary
    Extinction: The Parrots We’ve Lost By Desi Milpacher The definition of extinction is “the act or process of becoming extinct; a coming to an end or dying out: the extinction of a species.” Once extinction has been determined, there is usually no chance of a species recurring in a given ecosystem. In mankind’s active history of exploration, exploitation and settlement of new worlds, there has been much loss of natural resources. Parrots have suffered tremendously in this, with over twenty species having been permanently lost. And there are many more that are teetering on the edge, towards the interminable abyss. In this article we find out what happened to these lost treasures, learn which ones are currently being lost, and why this is important to our world. The Old and New Worlds and Their Lost Parrots Little is known of the natural history of most of the world’s extinct parrots, mainly because they disappeared before in-depth studies were conducted on them. It is generally believed, save the Central American macaws which were least known, that most fed on diets similar to today’s parrots (leaves, blossoms, seeds, nuts and fruits), frequented heavy forested areas and nested mainly in tree cavities. A number could not fly well, or were exceptionally tame, leading to their easy capture. Nearly all of these natural treasures vanished between the 18th and early 20th centuries, and the main reason for their loss was overhunting. Some lesser causes included egg collecting (popular with naturalists in the 19th century), diseases (introduced or endemic), drought, natural disasters, predation by introduced species, and habitat alternation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Timing of Diversification Within the Most Divergent Parrot Clade
    Journal of Avian Biology 45: 140–148, 2014 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2013.00200.x © 2013 T e Authors. Journal of Avian Biology © 2013 Nordic Society Oikos Subject Editor: Martin Paeckert. Accepted 25 October 2013 The timing of diversifi cation within the most divergent parrot clade Frank E. Rheindt , Les Christidis , Sylvia Kuhn , Siwo de Kloet , Janette A. Norman and Andrew Fidler F. E. Rheindt ([email protected]), Dept of Biological Sciences, National Univ. of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 129801, Singapore, and: Dept of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard Univ., USA. – L. Christidis, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross Univ., Australia, and: Dept of Genetics, Univ. of Melbourne, Australia. – S. Kuhn, Max Planck Inst. for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany. – S. de Kloet, Animal Genetics Inc., Tallahassee, Florida, USA. – J. A. Norman, Dept of Genetics, Univ. of Melbourne, Australia. – A. Fidler, Inst. of Marine Science, Univ. of Auckland, New Zealand. T e Strigopidae are an ancient parrot (Psittaciformes) family consisting of three extant species placed in two genera ( Nestor, Strigops ) and restricted to New Zealand. T eir evolutionary history is clouded because the timing of divergence events within this family has variously been attributed to Pleistocene climate change or much earlier earth-historic events. Here we examine new psittaciform DNA sequence data, and combine them with previously published sequences, to shed light on the poorly understood timing of diversifi cation within the Strigopidae. Using calibrations indirectly derived from both psittaciform and non-psittaciform fossils, our data indicate a Late Pliocene or Early Pleistocene (ca 1.2 – 3.6 mya) diff erentiation between the two Nestor species (kea and kaka), possibly in response to shifts in habitat distribution associated with sea level fl uctuations.
    [Show full text]
  • Kea-Kaka Population Viability Assessment ·-~~;;.-.,;,,~
    KEA-KAKA POPULATION VIABILITY ASSESSMENT ·-~~;;.-.,;,,~ The work of the Captive Breeding Specialist Group is made possible by generous contributions from the following members of the CBSG rnstitutional Conservation Council: Conservators ($10,000 and above) Cologne Zoo Stewards ($500-$999) Sponsors ($50-$249) Anheuser-Busch Corporation El Paso Zoo Aalborg Zoo African Safari Australian Species Management Program Federation of Zoological Gardens of Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Apenheul 7..oo. Chicago Zoological Society Great Britain and Ireland BanhamZoo Belize Zoo Columbus Zoological Gardens Fort Wayne Zoological Society Copenhagen Zoo Claws 'n Paws Denver Zoological Gardens Gladys Porter Zoo Cotswold Wildlife Park Darmstadt Zoo Fossil Rim Wildlife Center Indianapolis Zoological Society Dutch Federation of Zoological Gardens Dreher Park Zoo Friends of Zoo Atlanta Japanese Association of Zoological Parks Erie Zoological Park Fota Wildlife Park Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association and Aquariums Fota Wildlife Park Great Plains Zoo International Union of Directors of Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust Givskud Zoo Hancock House Publisher Zoological Gardens Lincoln Park Zoo Granby Zoological Society Kew Royal Botanic Gardens Lubee Foundation The living Desert Knoxville Zoo Nagoya Aquarium Metropolitan Toronto Zoo Marwell Zoological Park National Geographic Magazine National Audubon Society-Research Minnesota Zoological Garden Milwaukee County Zoo National Zoological Parks Board Ranch Sanctuary New York Zoological Society NOAHS Center of South
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Establishing North Island Kākā (Nestor Meridionalis Septentrionalis
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Re-establishing North Island kākā (Nestor meridionalis septentrionalis) in New Zealand A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Conservation Biology Massey University Auckland, New Zealand Tineke Joustra 2018 ii For Orlando, Aurora and Nayeli “I don’t want my children to follow in my footsteps, I want them to take the path next to me and go further than I could have ever dreamt possible” Anonymous iii iv Abstract Recently there has been a global increase in concern over the unprecedented loss of biodiversity and how the sixth mass extinction event is mainly due to human activities. Countries such as New Zealand have unique ecosystems which led to the evolution of many endemic species. One such New Zealand species is the kākā (Nestor meridionalis). Historically, kākā abundance has been affected by human activities (kākā were an important food source for Māori and Europeans). Today, introduced mammalian predators are one of the main threats to wild kākā populations. Although widespread and common throughout New Zealand until the 1800’s, kākā populations on the mainland now heavily rely on active conservation management. The main methods of kākā management include pest control and re-establishments. This thesis evaluated current and past commitments to New Zealand species restoration, as well as an analysis of global Psittacine re-establishment efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Kea (Nestor Notabilis) Care Manual
    Kea (Nestor notabilis) CARE MANUAL CREATED BY THE AZA Kea Species Survival Plan® Program IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE AZA Parrot Taxon Advisory Group Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in collaboration with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Kea Species Survival Plan (Nestor notabilis). (2020). Kea Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: July 1, 2019 Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Coordinator: Kimberly Klosterman, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Senior Avian Keeper, Kea SSP Vice Coordinator Authors and Significant Contributors: Krista Adlehart CRM, Woodland Park Zoo, Animal Management Registrar Amanda Ardente NVM, PhD, Walt Disney World, University of Florida, Nutrition Fellow Jackie Bray, MA Zoology CPBT-KA, Raptor Incorporated, Associate Director Cassandre Crawford MM, Northwest Local School District, Orchestra Director, Kea SSP Volunteer Thea Etchells, Denver Zoo, Bird Keeper Linda Henry, Board Member of Zoological Lighting Institute, SeaWorld San Diego Phillip Horvey, Sedgwick County Zoo, Senior Zookeeper, Masked Lapwing SSP Coordinator and Studbook Keeper Cari Inserra, San Diego Zoo, Lead Animal Trainer Kimberly Klosterman, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Senior Avian Keeper, Kea Care Manual Coordinator, Vice Coordinator Kea SSP Program Jessica Meehan, Denver Zoo, Bird Keeper, Kea SSP Coordinator and Studbook Keeper Jennifer Nollman DVM, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Associate Veterinarian Catherine Vine, Philadelphia Zoo, Avian Keeper Reviewers: Raoul Schwing PhD, Head of Kea Lab & Infrastructure Project Manager, Messerli Research Institute, University of Vienna, AU Tamsin Orr-Walker, BAAT, Co-founder, Trustee & Chair of Kea Conservation Trust, South Island Community Engagement Coordinator, NZ Nigel Simpson, EAZA Kea EEP Coordinator, Head of Operations, Wild Place Project, Bristol Zoological Society, UK Dr.rer.nat Gyula K.
    [Show full text]
  • Avifauna from the Emily Bay Settlement Site, Norfolk Island: a Preliminary Account
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2001 Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 27 (2001): 85–100. ISBN 0 7347 2305 9 Avifauna from the Emily Bay Settlement Site, Norfolk Island: A Preliminary Account RICHARD N. HOLDAWAY1 AND ATHOLL ANDERSON2 1 Palaecol Research, PO Box 16569, Christchurch, New Zealand [email protected] 2 Department of Archaeology & Natural History, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. The avifauna of the Emily Bay settlement site, Norfolk Island, southwest Pacific, is described. Most of the remains, which consisted of nearly 10,000 identifiable bones (mostly fragmentary) and several thousand unidentifiable elements and fragments, were of several species of petrel and shearwater (Procellariiformes) and boobies (Sulidae), but some land birds were also represented in small numbers. Two species of migratory wading bird (Charadriiformes) were identified in the deposits, but no terns, which are dominant members of the present avifauna. The taphonomy of the remains indicates intensive use of birds as food, but some material of other than cultural origin was also present. Remains were not distributed evenly throughout the excavated parts of the site, and were concentrated in areas where other evidence such as post holes and fires scoops indicated points of occupation. Some species that are present on the island and palatable were not represented in the collections: possible reasons for their absence are canvassed. An estimate of the biomass is presented, with the proviso that the variation in density of deposition made extrapolation to the remainder of the site problematic. The size of the sample, the preservation of elements such as vertebrae of small petrels, and the good condition of material of apparent natural (non-cultural) origin indicate that the collection represents a good sample of the avifauna used as food by the Polynesian inhabitants of Emily Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 §4-71-6.5 List of Restricted Animals [ ] Part A: For
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF RESTRICTED ANIMALS [ ] PART A: FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Hirudinea ORDER Gnathobdellida FAMILY Hirudinidae Hirudo medicinalis leech, medicinal ORDER Rhynchobdellae FAMILY Glossiphoniidae Helobdella triserialis leech, small snail CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Euchytraeidae Enchytraeidae (all species in worm, white family) FAMILY Eudrilidae Helodrilus foetidus earthworm FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus terrestris earthworm Allophora (all species in genus) earthworm CLASS Polychaeta ORDER Phyllodocida FAMILY Nereidae Nereis japonica lugworm PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Arachnida ORDER Acari FAMILY Phytoseiidae 1 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Iphiseius degenerans predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus longipes predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus macropilis predator, spider mite Neoseiulus californicus predator, spider mite Neoseiulus longispinosus predator, spider mite Typhlodromus occidentalis mite, western predatory FAMILY Tetranychidae Tetranychus lintearius biocontrol agent, gorse CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Hyalidae Parhyale hawaiensis amphipod, marine ORDER Anomura FAMILY Porcellanidae Petrolisthes cabrolloi crab, porcelain Petrolisthes cinctipes crab, porcelain Petrolisthes elongatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes eriomerus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes gracilis crab, porcelain Petrolisthes granulosus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes japonicus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes laevigatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the 'Hercules Parrot' from Prehistoric New Zealand – the Biggest Ever Discovered
    17/06/2020 Meet the 'Hercules parrot' from prehistoric New Zealand – the biggest ever discovered Support accurate, fact-based coverage on COVID-19. Donate Academic rigour, journalistic flair Meet the ‘Hercules parrot’ from prehistoric New Zealand – the biggest ever discovered August 7, 2019 9.13am AEST Author Trevor H. Worthy Associate professor, Flinders University Heracles inexpectatus on the forest floor, with three small wrens foraging at its feet. Brian Choo, Author provided Say hello to Heracles inexpectatus, a parrot the size of a human child. But don’t worry, you won’t meet one face to face. Our new discovery, published today, lived around 20 million years ago in what is now New Zealand – adding to the islands’ rich and storied collection of remarkable bird species. Heracles was truly a giant among birds. It was about 1m long, stood 80-90cm tall, and weighed about 7kg. That makes it about the same size as a dodo, and far bigger than its modern-day cousin, the kākāpō. Unsurprisingly, given its heft, it was likely also flightless. https://theconversation.com/meet-the-hercules-parrot-from-prehistoric-new-zealand-the-biggest-ever-discovered-121437 1/3 17/06/2020 Meet the 'Hercules parrot' from prehistoric New Zealand – the biggest ever discovered Read more: Tall turkeys and nuggety chickens: large 'megapode' birds once lived across Australia Islands are renowned for huge birds, perhaps none more so than New Zealand. Its fame in this regard began in 1839, when the English scientist Richard Owen first revealed the giant moa to the scientific world. In the next few years, many species of moa were named; now there are nine species in six genera, making them the world’s largest grouping of flightless birds.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT NOTE Kea (Nestor Notabilis) – Another North Island Human
    174 Notornis, 2014, Vol. 61: 174-176 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand Inc. SHORT NOTE Kea (Nestor notabilis) – another North Island human-caused extinction ALAN J.D. TENNYSON* Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand LUKE J. EASTON Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand JAMIE R. WOOD Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand In historic times, natural populations of the endemic The first record was discovered while re- kea (Nestor notabilis) have been restricted to the housing the large Poukawa fossil bone collection in South Island of New Zealand. Although there have the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa been a few recent records of the species from the (NMNZ) in 2001 - AJDT identified a left humerus North Island, these have all been individual vagrant (NMNZ S.18399) and a left ulna (NMNZ S.21509) birds which may have originated from local captive as kea, using comparative material in the NMNZ populations (Cunningham 1974). In addition to collections. Poukawa is a lowland (21 m a.s.l.) wetland these sightings, there is a single prehistoric record of deposit in the Hawke's Bay, eastern North Island, kea from the North Island, described by Holdaway that spans the last c.7,000 years (Horn 1983). Pollen & Worthy (1993; Canterbury Museum AV 18389) evidence shows that in pre-human times the local from a cave in the Waitomo area. However, they vegetation was dominated by kahikatea (Dacrycarpus concluded from its age (Otiran, Late Pleistocene), dacrydioides) forest (McGlone 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    32 Notornis, 2008, Vol. 55: 32-37 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. Application of the new names in the 1794 J.R. Forster footnote on Norfolk Island birds FRANK D. STEINHEIMER* Wöhlertstrasse 5, D-10115 Berlin, Germany [email protected] RICHARD SCHODDE Australian Biological Resources Study, GPO Box 787, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia [email protected] WALTER J. BOCK Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, 1212 Amsterdam Avenue, PB 2428 New York, NY, 10027, USA [email protected] Abstract Johann Reinhold Forster (1794) described a handful of new bird taxa in a footnote to his translation of Philip Gidley King’s account of a visit to Norfolk Island. While most of these new bird names have older synonyms, are nomina nuda or are previously published, three of them – Psittacus hypopolius, Columba argetraea and Mostacilla [sic: Motacilla] ventilabrum – are available by description and are open to interpretation as the valid senior names for the Norfolk Island kaka, Norfolk Island fruit pigeon and Norfolk Island grey fantail respectively. However, Forster (1794) based these descriptions on a mixed type series of birds from mainland New Zealand (South Island) and Norfolk Island, and, by lectotypification, these three names are here established for the New Zealand forms, thereby maintaining priority for names already in wide use for the three Norfolk taxa, namely productus Gould, 1836 for the kaka, spadicea Latham, 1801 for the fruit pigeon, and pelzelni G.R. Gray, 1862 for the grey fantail. Steinheimer, F.D.; Schodde, R.; Bock, W.J. 2008. Application of the new names in the 1794 J.R.
    [Show full text]