DOCSLIB.ORG

PLANNING COMMITTEE Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLANNING COMMITTEE Meeting PLANNING COMMITTEE Meeting - 21 October 2009 First Part of the meeting Present: Mrs Lowen Cooper (Chairman) , Mrs Cranmer (Vice -Chairman) Mrs Cranmer, Mr Bowater, Mr Brown, Mrs Holloway, Mrs Simmonds, Mr Thomson, Mr Weir and Mrs Woolveridge* Also Present: Miss Arnold, Mr Clark, Ms Vigor -Hedderly and Mr Wilson Apologies for absence : Mr Bradford, Mr Dhillon and Mr Reed * Members attending site visits taken on 14 October 2009 61. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting held on 23 September 2009 were confirmed and signed by the Chairman. 62. APPLICATIONS AND PLANS Key to the following decisions: ADV - Consent to Display Adverts; ARM - Approval of Reserved Matters; CI - Certificate of Lawfulness Issued; CON - Conservation Area Consent; D - Deferred; D (INF) - Deferred for Further Information; D (SV) - Deferred for Site Visits; D (PO) - Deferred for Planning Obligation; D (NEG) - Deferred for Negotiations; FCG - Consent for Tree Work; LBC - Listed Building Consent; OP - Outline Planning Permission; P - Application Permitted; R - Refused or Rejected; R (AO) – Refused against Officer recommendation; RC - Removal of Condition; TC - Temporary Consent; TP - Temporary Permission; ULBC - Unconditional Listed Building Consent; UP - Unconditional Permission; VG - Variation Granted; W - Application Withdrawn. (A) APPLICATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION UNDER PLANNING ONLY:- 1. 09/00706/OUT Development o f a living and working community R Pinewood Studios for the creative industries comprising external Ltd streetscapes for filming, employment uses, education provision, residential development, landscaping and re-profiling of a former landfill area, formal and informal recreation provision, local retail and community facilities, an energy centre, access roads, car parking and ancillary facilities. Land adjacent to Pinewood Studios, Pinewood Road, Iver Heath, Iver, Buckinghamshire (Notes: (1) Prior to consideration of this application, Mr Mitchell Gear, on behalf of the objectors, and Mr Ivan Dunleavy, in support of the application, addressed the meeting – allowed as an exception to the rules on public speaking. (2) Mr Wilson, in attendance at the meeting as a non-member, addressed the Committee on this application (3) Mr Thomson declared a personal interest arising from his neighbours’ links with Pinewood Studios). Planning Committee - 21 October 2009 2. 09/00707/FUL Highway improvements to the Five Points R Pinewood Studios roundabout. Five Points Roundabout, Uxbridge Ltd Road, Iver Heath, Buckinghamshire. (Note: Mr Thomson declared a personal interest arising from his neighbours’ links with Pinewood Studios). 3. 09/00708/FUL Highway improvements to the Denham R Pinewood Studios Road/Sevenhills Road junction. Junction at Ltd Sevenhills Road and Denham Road, Iver, Buckinghamshire (Note: Mr Thomson declared a personal interest arising from his neighbours’ links with Pinewood Studios). The Committee adjourned at 17:15 and reconvened at 17:45 Second part of the Meeting Present: Mrs Lowen-Cooper* (Chairman), Mrs Cranmer (Vice-Chairman), Mr Bowater*, Mr Brown*, Mrs Holloway*, Mr Reed, Mrs Simmonds*, Mr Thomson*, Mr Weir* and Mrs Woolveridge*. Apologies: Mr Bradford* and Mr Dhillon* 4. 09/00916/ FUL Two detached houses with integral garages and P L & P Services construction of vehicular access. Land rear of Budleigh, Parsonage Lane, Farnham Common, Buckinghamshire SL2 3NX (Note: Prior to consideration of this application, Ms Linda Keely and Mr Colin Snowden, the objectors, addressed the meeting) 5. 09/01080/FUL Change of use from shop to hot food takeaway (Use P Mr Dean St John Class A5). 19 Langley Park Road, Iver, Buckinghamshire SL0 9QL. (Note: Prior to consideration of this applic ation, Mr Chris Ring, the objector, and Mr John Porter the applicant addressed the meeting) 6. 09/01123/FUL Redevelopment of site to provide 5 dwellings (one P Oakford Homes terrace of 3 units and 1 pair of units) with Ltd associated car parking, landscaping. Alteration to vehicular access. The One Pin, One Pin Lane, Farnham Common, Buckinghamshire SL2 3RD (Notes (1): Mrs Cranmer informed the Committee that she had been reported in a local paper expressing the views of her ward regarding this site in 2008, but had come to the Committee without any pre-determination regarding this application). (2): Prior to consideration of this application, Mr Nigel O’Driscoll, the objector, and Mrs Jane Carter the agent addressed the meeting) 211009 Planning Committee - 21 October 2009 7. 09/00655/ FUL Application to discharge and modify planning D(PO) LS Taplow Ltd. obligations in the Section 106 Agreement dated 16 th April 1997 ‘To permit the sale of food and drink’. The Bishop Centre, Bath Road, Taplow, Buckinghamshire SL6 0NX. RESOLVED that this application be deferred and the decision to grant permission be delegated to the Head of Legal and Democratic Services/Head of Sustainable Development, subject to agreeing the definition of Highway works (Note: Mr Weir declared a personal interest in this application arising from ) 8. 09/01146/FUL Retention and alteration of first floor and roof R Mr & Mrs extension incorporating front and rear dormers. Kotecha Two storey rear extension. (Amendment to planning permission 06/00777/FUL). Waterside (formally known as Harmony House), Bakers Wood, Denham, Buckinghamshire UB9 4LG. 9. 09/01148/FUL Retention and alteration of first floor and roof R Mr & Mrs extension incorporating front and rear dormers. Kotecha Two storey rear extension. (Amendment to planning permission 06/00777/FUL). Waterside (formally known as Harmony House), Bakers Wood, Denham, Buckinghamshire UB9 4LG. 10. 09/01150/FUL Retention and alteration of first floor and roof R Mr & Mrs extension incorporating front a nd rear dormers. Kotecha Two storey rear extension. (Amendment to planning permission 06/00777/FUL). Waterside (formally known as Harmony House), Bakers Wood, Denham, Buckinghamshire UB9 4LG. (Note: Re applications 09/01146/FUL, 09/01148/FUL and 09/01150/FUL- letters from the owners and their solicitors were tabled for consideration before Members reached their decision). (B) APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY The Committee received for information a list of applications determined by the Director of Services. 63. 34A SWALLOW STREET, IVER HEATH, BUCKS, SL0 0HG The Committee considered a report of the Director of Services requesting authority to issue and serve an Enforcement Notice in respect of the unauthorised erection of an outbuilding (timber shed/workshop) and children’s play fort on land at 34a Swallow Street, Iver Heath. The unauthorised development was erected on the land to the rear of the site in March 2006 and was substantially completed in August 2006. The unauthorised development is known to be used by the site owner’s son and his family who live next door in 36A Swallow Street. The site has a detailed planning and enforcement history and had been the subject of a number of planning applications including those for residential development. The land benefits from Certificates of Lawfulness dated 21 st March 2005 (planning reference 04/01046/EUC) and 23 rd May 2008 (planning 211009 Planning Committee - 21 October 2009 reference 08/00575/EUC) for use of this land for residential purposes in connection with 36A Swallow Street (but not as residential curtilage). On 21 April 2008 the Council refused an application for proposed operational development using Permitted Development rights rather than express planning permission (planning reference 08/00414/EUC) on this land. The subsequent appeal was dismissed on 13 January 2009. The Planning Inspector confirmed that the land on which that development was located did not form part of a residential curtilage and did not therefore benefit from any Permitted Development rights. The same principles were applied by officers to the land on which the subject unauthorised development was located. Enforcement Officers visited the site and requested that the unauthorised development be removed. A site visit taken on 11 September 2009 confirmed that the unauthorised development remains. The registered owner of the site, the owner’s son and his partner together with the sons planning agent have been informed in writing that authority was to being sought for the issuing of an Enforcement Notice seeking the removal of the unauthorised development and any associated materials in respect thereof from the site. The Committee reviewed the reasons why it was considered expedient to take enforcement action. The unauthorised development had been erected on land situated within the Metropolitan Green Belt where there is a presumption against development other than for a specified list of categories such as development for agriculture or forestry. The unauthorised development does not fall within any of these categories and as such constitute inappropriate development, which by definition harmful to the Metropolitan Green Belt. As well as being unacceptable in principle, the unauthorised development represents a prominent physical and visual intrusion into the Green Belt, and no very special circumstances had been advanced sufficient to warrant an exception to the normal operation of Green Belt policy. As such the unauthorised development is contrary to policies GB1 and EP3 of the South Bucks District Local Plan (adopted March 1999). The site is located within the Colne Valley Park wherein proposals will only be permitted where, amongst other criteria, they maintain and enhance the landscape in terms of its character, its scenic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Area 74 Area (Ha) 538.0 Local Authority South Bucks
    General Area 74 Area (ha) 538.0 Local South Bucks Authority Location Plan Description General Area 74 is located to the north and west of Iver Heath and contains land with planning permission for the expanded Pinewood Studios. It is bounded to the west by Black Park Road, Fulmer Common Road, Windmill Road and Fulmer Road, to the south by the A412, to the east by the M25 and to the north by the M40. Parts of the parcel’s eastern and south-eastern boundaries directly adjoin Iver Heath. Purpose Criteria Assessment Score (1) To check (a) Land parcel is at the The land parcel is not at the edge of an identified large built- FAIL the edge of one or more up area. unrestricted distinct large built-up sprawl of areas. large built-up (b) Prevents the outward 0 areas sprawl of a large built- up area into open land, and serves as a barrier at the edge of a large built- up area in the absence of another durable boundary. Purpose 1: Total Score 0/5 (2) To prevent Prevents development The parcel forms part of the wider gap between Gerrards 3 neighbouring that would result in Cross and Iver Heath, and Slough and Iver Heath. The towns from merging of or significant northern and south-western areas of the parcel in particular merging erosion of gap between play a role in maintaining the general scale and openness of neighbouring this gap and preventing the coalescence of the settlements, settlements, including though the south-eastern area is less important for preventing ribbon development coalescence.
    [Show full text]
  • Iver Motorway Service Area Response, February 2021
    President: Rt.Hon. the Lord Randall of Uxbridge Kt.PC. Planning Service Buckinghamshire Council King George V House King George V Road Amersham HP6 5AW February 2021 Dear Sir/Madam Re: Planning application PL/20/4332/0A Motorway Service Area between Junctions 15 and 16 near Iver Heath This application falls within the Colne Valley Regional Park (CVRP) and the Green Belt. Buckinghamshire Council and the former Chiltern and South Bucks Councils have been supporters of the CVRP since its inception. We hope the Council will continue to uphold the six objectives of the CVRP since this application represents the loss of farmland; the loss of 46 Ha of the CVRP and the Green Belt in a sensitive location; harm to recreational rights of way; harm to watercourses which run through the development, and the loss of, and harm to, existing grassland, woodland, hedgerows and their accompanying biodiversity. • This response to the planning application also looks at the case for the Motorway Service Areas affecting the CVRP, including the one in this location • The strategic planning context and the impact on the Green Belt • The extent of the harm arising from the scheme and • The scale of mitigation that should accompany the development if the very special circumstances’ (VSC) were to be accepted by the decision maker (whether the Council or Secretary of State). The case for an MSA in this location This application for a motorway service area is one of three currently being considered by local authorities along the north-western edge of the M25. All the operators state that there is a need for an MSA on this stretch of motorway between the existing Cobham and South Mimms MSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987
    10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a Resource Assessment
    Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a resource assessment Inheritance Mobility Although Neolithic populations are thought to have had continued mobility, more and more evidence for Neolithic settlement has come to light. In Buckinghamshire the most important evidence comes from excavations in advance of the construction of Eton Rowing Course (ERC) and the Maidenhead to Windsor and Eton Flood Alleviation Scheme (MWEFAS), mainly in the parish of Dorney in South Bucks on the Thames. The evidence points to intensive use of the area by people in the Early Neolithic but it is not certain that it represents year-round sedentary occupation rather than seasonal re-use (Allen et al 2004). Other evidence does point to continued mobility, such as the artefact scatters at Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham (Mitchell 2004) and East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990) for example, reflecting visits over a long period of time. Persistent places Mesolithic persistent places continue to have meaning for Early and later Neolithic populations. These persistent places include East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990, 18) and Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age activity at Chessvale Bowling Club nearby (Halsted 2006, 23-8). Another persistent place seems to have been the lower reaches of the River Colne. Recent excavations at the Sanderson Site, Denham (Halsey 2005) continued the activity from nearby Three Ways Wharf, Uxbridge (Lewis 1991). Other persistent places include the attractive river valley location at Bancroft in Milton Keynes (Williams 1993, 5), and Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham, where the River Thame meets one of its tributaries (Mitchell 2004, 1). These persistent places may have been the basis of evolving ideas about land tenure.
    [Show full text]
  • 582 A4 TT Blue
    582 Windsor - Iver - Denham Saturdays only Village RoadCheapside Lane Windsor Slough Iver Iver Heath Denham Denham Higher DenhamNightingaleWyatts Way CovertDenham GardenDenhamStation Village Parade TfL Bus Passes, Travelcards, Saver Tickets and Oyster pay as you go are not accepted on this service. Cash fares may differ from those charged on other local bus services. Saturday Windsor Parish Church 1510 Slough Wellington Street R 1529 George Green Uxbridge Road 1533 Iver King’s Church 1542 Iver Heath Black Horse 1546 Denham Village Road 1555 Higher Denham Community Centre 1601 Nightingale Way Alex Korda House 1606 Wyatts Covert Caravan Site 1611 Denham Garden Village 1615 Denham Station Parade R 1619 No service on other days or Public Holidays Route 582 is operated on behalf of Buckinghamshire County Council Operated by Carousel Buses (01494 450151) 28.1.13(A)_T582/1 MAYOR OF LONDON *You pay no more than 5p per minute if calling from a BT Landline. There may be a connection charge. Charges from mobiles or other landline providers may vary. 582 Denham - Iver - Windsor Saturdays only Village Road Station ParadeCheapside VillageLane Road Denham Higher DenhamNightingaleWyatts Way CovertDenham GardenPenn DriveVillageDenham Denham Denham Iver HeathIver Slough Windsor TfL Bus Passes, Travelcards, Saver Tickets and Oyster pay as you go are not accepted on this service. Cash fares may differ from those charged on other local bus services. Saturday Denham Village Road 1027 Higher Denham Community Centre 1033 Nightingale Way Alex Korda House 1038 Wyatts Covert Caravan Site 1043 Denham Garden Village 1048 Denham Station Parade R 1051 Denham Village Road 1055 Iver Heath Black Horse 1106 Iver King’s Church 1110 George Green Uxbridge Road 1119 Slough Wellington Street R 1123 Windsor High Street 1141 No service on other days or Public Holidays Route 582 is operated on behalf of Buckinghamshire County Council Operated by Carousel Buses (01494 450151) 28.1.13(A)_T582/2 MAYOR OF LONDON *You pay no more than 5p per minute if calling from a BT Landline.
    [Show full text]
  • Locality Profile 2016
    Locality Profile 2016 Locality Profile Southern Locality Chapters Map of the locality Demographics and Public Health Data Changes over the last 5 years Local Plan Key Communities Who's Who Dr Conan Hassim Transport and Employment Clinical Locality Lead, Southern Locality GP at Threeways Surgery, Stoke Poges Patient Services used, CQC Mrs Helen Ellis Nurse Locality Lead, Southern Locality Community assets, Practice Nurse at Misbourne Surgery Pharmacies Locality GP Practices Dentists Burnham Health Centre Opticians Denham Medical Centre Learning Disability Centers Southmead Surgery Children Centers The Allan Practice Social Care The Hall Practice The Ivers Practice Voluntary sector services The Misbourne Practice Threeways Surgery Prisons, Universities, colleges, Private hospitals, Schools etc. Next 5 Years SWOT Analysis Locality Profile 2016 Demographics and Public Health Data1 Specific issues to consider in the Southern locality The Southern Locality’s population size in 2016 is around 84,033 people around 25% of the total Bucks population. Around 20% of the population is aged 65+ higher than the CCCG average of 18% and Bucks average of 17%. 23% of the population is aged <19 compared to 24% in CCCG and Bucks. The deprivation levels and proportion of ethnic minority population are less than the CCG and Buckinghamshire average as a whole. Life expectancy is better than the national average and similar to Bucks average but there is a difference of 3 years in life expectancy between males and females in South Bucks District Council, compared to a difference of 3.5 years in Bucks. The population of Southern locality experiences similar or worse health outcomes in some areas compared to the Buckinghamshire population.
    [Show full text]
  • Wexham and Ivers Local Area Forum
    Wexham and Ivers Local Area Forum Local Area Plan February 2016 Contents The purpose of the Area Plan .................................................................................................................. 2 Local Community Areas map .................................................................................................................. 3 Map of The Wexham and Iver Local Area .......................................................................................... 4 The Wexham and Iver Local Area Forum ........................................................................................... 5 The Wexham and Iver Local Area Forum membership ..................................................................... 6 Local Area Forum representatives .......................................................................................................... 8 Local Area Profile .................................................................................................................................... 10 The Wexham and Iver Local Area Forum priorities .......................................................................12 The purpose of the Wexham and Iver Area Plan The purpose of the Wexham and Iver Ar- act as a co-coordinating body and catalyst ea Plan is to set out a clear list of local for action, with the LAF taking a, champi- priorities that can be actively worked on oning and lobbying role. by the Local area Forum and community The Area Plan should be regarded as an members which will endeavor to make initial
    [Show full text]
  • Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work
    W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 1 W1.1 Maidenhead Bridge Proposed Work The Maidenhead Bridge over the River Thames at Maidenhead is a Grade II* listed structure. Installation of overhead electrification on top of the structure would be required. The design is being undertaken in conjunction with heritage specialists to help ensure that the impact on the structure is acceptable. Once installed, the gantries are likely to be visible on the bridge from viewpoints along the river and nearby. As an example, electrification for the Heathrow Express involved the provision of overhead electrification over Wharncliffe Viaduct in Ealing. Wharncliffe Viaduct Example of similar overhead electrification installations. Maidenhead Bridge www.crossrail.co.uk Helpdesk 0845 602 3813 Crossing the Capital Connecting the UK W01-W05.Maidenhead 25/8/04 5:19 PM Page 2 W2.1 Maidenhead Maidenhead Stabling & Turnback It is proposed that a stabling facility be provided for up I Operational noise from the use of the sidings to 6 Crossrail trains in the former goods yard to the I Dust impact on nearby buildings during west of Maidenhead station, immediately beyond the construction. Appropriate dust mitigation junction of the Bourne End Branch. techniques would be incorporated within the The proposals are to modify the track layout and train Crossrail Construction Code in order to reduce sidings at Maidenhead to enable Crossrail trains to be the risk of a dust nuisance being caused. The reversed with a new siding to be developed within the Construction Code would require the establishment existing Network Rail sidings.
    [Show full text]
  • FULMER NEWSLETTER December 2014 – Issue 56
    FULMER NEWSLETTER December 2014 – Issue 56 www.fulmervillage.org LIST OF ADVERTISERS Bucks Prestige Cars, Mark Roberts 07436 548784 Brunel Gallery 01753 662323 Chiropody, Adriana Rozek 01753 652754 Dog Walking Service 07922 577699 Hamptons Estate Agents, Gerrards Cross 01753 886464 Helping hands – Care Service 0808 1801021 Hibiscus beauty salon, Wexham 01753 664166 Plumbing/electrics, Tom Kehoe 01494 580518/07716 440916 South Bucks Physio, Wexham 01753 664114 Stoke Poges Memorial Gardens 01753 523744 We are very grateful to our advertisers, many of whom have been supporting the Newsletter for a number of years. Please remember to tell any of the advertisers that you have seen their advert here. The advertising income with a contribution from the Parish Council helps us fund the Newsletter and secure its future. If anyone would like to advertise in a future issue, please contact Susie Simkins on 662537 or by email to susiemsimkins@gmail. From Dominic Grieve QC MP As I write this piece, the rain is falling outside and the long-range weather forecast predicts a wet winter. I hope it may be mistaken as my trips round the constituency show me that ground and river water levels remain high after last winter’s offering. Fortunately much of Fulmer being an old settlement was wisely placed in dry locations, something which modern development often ignores. Firm foundations both terrestrial and moral are a good place to withstand the vicissitudes which daily life throws up for us. I am conscious that the year has been not without its challenges. The prospect of the start of development at Pinewood is a source of anxiety and we must strive to ensure that the process and the end result preserve Fulmer’s charms.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL Sites Being Removed from The
    Classification: OFFICIAL Sites being removed from the South Bucks District Council Brownfield Land Register – December 2018 Site Site Name Address Reason for Removal Reference SB0133 ''Greenacres, 199 Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development Station Road, Beaconsfield'' SB0166 ''Land at Meadow Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development Cottage Saltmarshe and Longridge, Bangors Road South, Iver'' SB0197 ''Chopra Manor, Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development Crown Lane, Farnham Royal'' SB0206 ''Northfield, 40 Penn Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development Road, Beaconsfield'' SB0389 ''Phil Whitaker Cars, Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development Beaconsfield Road'' SB0394 ''15 and 17 South Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development Park Crescent, Gerrards Cross'' SB0397 ''20 to 22 High Street, Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development Iver, Bucks'' SB0398 ''Land At Bridge Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development Cottage, 45A Baring Road, Beaconsfield'' Classification: OFFICIAL Classification: OFFICIAL SB0399 ''Natwest Bank, 63 Development has commenced and the site is therefore no longer available for development High Street, Burnham'' SB0400 ''96 Gregories Road, Development
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. 9 Franklin .A.Rthur Ellis Esq
    DIRECTORY.] BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. 9 Franklin .A.rthur Ellis esq. Oha.rtridge lodge, Ohesba.m Levi Lt.-Col. Wm. John T.D. Wonghton h.ouse,Bletchley Fra<!er George Rae esq. Piggott'a manor, Letahmore tLiberty .A.rt.hur Lasenby eBq. The Manor hotJile, Th~ Heath. Watford, Herts Lee, Great Missenden Freeman George Mallows esq. K.C., B . .A.. 24a, Bryanston Locke Robert Willia~ esq. Bedford house, Aylesbury square, London W Longland Thomas esq. High street, Olney Fremantle The Hon. Cecil, Swanbourne house, Winslow Lovett Percival Cosby Ernest esq. Stoke ~odge, Stoke Fremantle Admiral Hon. Sir Edmund Robert G.C.B., Hammond, 'Bletchley C.~.G., F.R.G.S. 44 Lower Sloane street, London SW McCorquodale Norman esq. Winslow hall, Winslow 1Frema.ntle The Hon. Thomas Francis M ..A., V.D. The Mackenzie William Dalziel esq. M . .A.. Fawley court, Old house, Swa.nbourne, Window Henley -on-Thames Frith Lowndes William Frederick Lowndes esq. The Mackenzie William Roderick Dalziel esq. Sunnyclose, Faw- Bnry, Chesham ley, Henley-on-Thames Frye Frederick Charlwood esq. The Plat, Bourne End, Mann Joseph William esq. Orcha-rd house, Olney Maidenhead Mathews Ernest esq. Little Shardeloes, A.mersham Garner Joseph C'harles esq. 39 Market square, .A.ylesbury Meeking Lieut.-Col. Oha.rles M.A. Ricbinga park, Coin- Garrett-Pegge John William esq. Chesham Bois manor, brook, Slough Chesham Mills Joseph Trueman esq. Stockgrove, Soulbury,Leigh· Ga.rrett-Pegge Wilfrid George esq. M . .A.. Chesham Bois ton Buzzard manor, Chesham Morgan William James esq. High street, Marlow Gibson-Crnig Henry Vivian esq Morland Benjamin Henry esq. Sheepstead house, ~Iar- Gilbey Alfred esq.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesolithic Industries Beside Colne Waters in Iver and Denham, Buckinghamshire A
    MESOLITHIC INDUSTRIES BESIDE COLNE WATERS IN IVER AND DENHAM, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE A. D. LACAILLE, F.S.A. I. INTRODUCTION FOR well over thirty years the author has been studying Old Stone Age antiqu- ities assignable to different Lower Palaeolithic divisions and their mode of occurrence in the Pleistocene deposits of south-east Buckinghamshire. On these relics he has published some articles embodying his observations and the conclusions he has drawn from them. Most of the information has been obtained in commercial excavations for gravel and brickearth on the ancient terraces of the Thames, including Taplow and Burnham Beeches and as far downstream as the River Colne that separates our county from Hertfordshire and Middlesex. In this border region, particularly, workings in the valley of the Colne have afforded infinitely better opportunities than any diggings in that of the main river for examining the late Pleistocene flood-plain gravel and its Holocene or Recent overburden of alluvium. This comprises the post- glacial deposits of shell-marl, peats, sands, silts and muds. Where there has been no interference with nature the top soil on these sediments variously supports marshland plants, grasses, ferns, heath, sedges, scrub and small trees. The basal flood-plain gravel has yielded many bones of the late Pleistocene fauna that in archaeological chronology would be referred to the end of the Upper Palaeolithic division of the Old Stone Age, but so far no contemporary organic or unambiguous industrial remains of man. There is, however, the abundant evidence of stone implements to show that between Upper Palaeo- lithic times and the Neolithic, or New Stone Age, human bands were active beside the waters of the Colne.
    [Show full text]