Dedicated to General Idea 1969-1994 Esther Schipper Is Pleased To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Dedicated to General Idea 1969-1994 Esther Schipper is pleased to present AA Bronson’s White Flag, the artist’s second solo exhibition with the gallery. On September 11, 2001, AA Bronson was caught in Toronto when his flight home to New York was canceled. He watched in real time on television, as two airplanes punctured the twin towers of the World Trade Center, and then as the towers collapsed. It was seven days before he could rejoin his husband in lower Manhattan. What he found there is inscribed indelibly on his brain: a thick chalky dust of glass, concrete, paper, asbestos and human flesh that covered everything; and American flags, everywhere. White Flag presents seven paintings, each constructed of an American flag, purchased on eBay, mounted on raw linen, and coated in layers of an antique preparation of rabbit skin glue, chalk, and honey. This compound was, historically, used to prepare the ground upon which a painting was painted; it is literally the foundation of a history of painting. But here the ground becomes the painting itself, shrouding each flag—each with its history implicit in torn edges, holes and rips—in an elegiac ashen presence. The title White Flag is not merely descriptive of the paintings: it alludes to the plant White Flag, or Cemetery Iris, a white flower popular in Muslim and Christian cemeteries, cultivated for more than 3500 years. The plant is highly poisonous, invasive, and infertile. Indigenous to North Africa and the Middle East, it traveled with the Muslims to Spain and then with the Spanish to America. In Texas it is referred to as “the flower that you can’t kill”. While engaging in a larger task of mourning a personal, cultural and political past, this work also addresses migration, and the uneasy convergence of Muslim and Christian histories. These paintings evoke Jasper Johns’ iconic white-on-white White Flag of 1955. They echo General Idea’s White AIDS paintings and their PLa©ebo (Manzoni) of 1993. Although AA Bronson’s nod to Johns’ work is clearly intentional, Johns’ early Pop Art paintings disavow the symbolic meaning of their flags. Bronson, on the other hand charges these flags with personal, historical, and transnational significance, and clothes them in funereal attire. AA Bronson claims that these works came to him in a dream, and demanded to be ‘painted’, or perhaps, erased. As HIV and AIDS erased Bronson’s generation and General Idea itself, and as the spectral dust of 9/11 erased the downtown Manhattan scene of 2001, so these paintings speak to loss, absence, and mourning. (This document was automatically generated by Contemporary Art Library.).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Art Masterpiece: Three Flags, 1958 by Jasper Johns
Art Masterpiece: Three Flags, 1958 by Jasper Johns Keywords: Symmetry, Repetition Symmetry: parts are arranged the same on both sides Repetition: a design that has parts that are used over and over again in a pleasing way. Grade: 1st Grade Activity: Painted Flags Meet the Artist (5 minutes): · He was born in 1930 in Augusta, Georgia, but grew up in South Carolina. He had little formal art education since there weren’t any art schools nearby. · When he moved to New York, he became friends with the prominent artists of the day. · In 1954, he had a dream that he painted a large American Flag. · He liked his art to be symmetrical, repetitious and minimalist. In other words, he wanted it to stand on its own and without the attachments of emotion. He liked the simple design of objects like the American Flag. · His Flag series made him famous as an artist. Possible Questions (10 minutes): • Do you see repetition in this picture? • Is it symmetrical? Are the parts arranged in the same basic way on both sides? • Describe the lines that you see... • What makes this picture different from a real American Flag? Property of Knox Art Masterpiece Revised 8/3/13 • What does our American Flag mean to you? Symbolism, liberty, freedom, pride. The American flag flies on the moon, sits atop Mount Everest, is hurtling out in space. The flag is how America signs her name. • Sometimes the Flag is hung at half-staff. Why? (To honor certain people who have died) • Who created the American Flag? Betsy Ross.
[Show full text]
Vt~ • He Moved to New York City When He Was 19 and Briefly Studied at a Well Uf Known Art School
Three Flags by Jasper Johns done in 19~, the artist painted 3 separate flags using what is known as encaustic which is the use of wax and pigment on canvas. He attached each of them to each other to create a 3 dimensional object. This form of art is known as pop art- using familiar imagery from everyday life. It was acquired by the Whitney Museum in New York City in 1980 for 1 million dollars. Meet the Artist: Jasper Johns • He was born in 1930 in Augusta, Georgia, but grew up in South Carolina. He began drawing when he was 3 but had little exposure to art education. ~ vv~ Vt~ • He moved to New York City when he was 19 and briefly studied at a well Uf known art school. He became friends with other prominent artists of the day and together they began developing their ideas on art concepts. • He is best known for his "Flag," (1954-55) painting after he had a dream about a large American Flag. • Many images in his art are recognizable symbols and familiar objects that stand on their own design that don't need interpretation or have a hidden meaning or emotion. • He liked the simple design of objects like the American Flag, the alphabet, numbers or a map of the United States as these symbols are powerful on their own. • He carefully chose the subject matter for his art based on its simplicity, symmetry, and basic patterns. • His Flag series was what made him famous as an artist but he also worked with other mediums.
[Show full text]
Art Masterpiece: Three Flags, 1958 by Jasper Johns
Three Flags, 1958 Jasper Johns Keywords: Pop Art, Monotype, Print, Texture Activity: Monoprint on foil Keywords Defined: • Pop Art - Style of art made popular in late 1950's early 1960's. Much of it represented images of common commercial images and objects. • Monotype - A one-of-a-kind print made by painting on a smooth metal, glass, stone plate or other smooth surface and then printing on paper. The paper, often dampened, is placed over the image and either burnished by hand or run through an etching press. The pressure of printing creates a texture not possible when painting directly on paper. The process produces a single unique print, thus an edition of one, by using pressure to transfer the image onto paper. The Monotype is a mirror image of what was drawn onto the original surface. • Print - a kind of artwork in which ink or paint is put onto a block (wood, linoleum, etc.) which has a design carved into it. The block is then pressed onto paper to make a print (copy) of the design. • Texture – an element of art. The way an object looks as though it feels, such as rough or smooth. Meet the Artist: • He was born in 1930 in Augusta, Georgia, but grew up in South Carolina. He had little official art education since there were no art schools nearby. • When he moved to New York, he became friends with the prominent artists of the day. • In 1954, he had a dream that he painted a large American Flag. • He liked his art to be symmetrical, repetitious and minimalist.
[Show full text]
“Just What Was It That Made U.S. Art So Different, So Appealing?”
“JUST WHAT WAS IT THAT MADE U.S. ART SO DIFFERENT, SO APPEALING?”: CASE STUDIES OF THE CRITICAL RECEPTION OF AMERICAN AVANT-GARDE PAINTING IN LONDON, 1950-1964 by FRANK G. SPICER III Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Dr. Ellen G. Landau Department of Art History and Art CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2009 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Frank G. Spicer III ______________________________________________________ Doctor of Philosophy candidate for the ________________________________degree *. Dr. Ellen G. Landau (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________Dr. Anne Helmreich Dr. Henry Adams ________________________________________________ Dr. Kurt Koenigsberger ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ December 18, 2008 (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Table of Contents List of Figures 2 Acknowledgements 7 Abstract 12 Introduction 14 Chapter I. Historiography of Secondary Literature 23 II. The London Milieu 49 III. The Early Period: 1946/1950-55 73 IV. The Middle Period: 1956-59: Part 1, The Tate 94 V. The Middle Period: 1956-59: Part 2 127 VI. The Later Period: 1960-1962 171 VII. The Later Period: 1963-64: Part 1 213 VIII. The Later Period: 1963-64: Part 2 250 Concluding Remarks 286 Figures 299 Bibliography 384 1 List of Figures Fig. 1 Richard Hamilton Just What Is It That Makes Today’s Homes So Different, So Appealing? (1956) Fig. 2 Modern Art in the United States Catalogue Cover Fig. 3 The New American Painting Catalogue Cover Fig.
[Show full text]
Flag(1954–55) in Late 1954 Jasper Johns Destroyed Virtually All of His
Flag (1954–55) In late 1954 Jasper Johns destroyed virtually all of his previous work. He was twenty-four years old and had been living in New York since his discharge from the United States Army in May 1953. It was time, he remembers, “to stop becoming and to be an artist. I had a wish to determine what I was. what I wanted to do was find out what I did that other people didn’t, what I was that other people weren’t.” The impetus for the picture that launched his career came from a source that was uniquely his: “One night I dreamed that I painted a large American flag, and the next morning I got up and I went out and bought the materials to begin it.” Flag was one of several paintings that delivered a still- memorable jolt to the art world during Johns’s first solo exhibition, in New York in early 1958 at Leo Castelli’s new gallery. Of all the puzzling pictures, Flag’s cool, painterly appropriation of the Stars and Stripes attracted particular scrutiny. It was, wrote Robert Rosenblum, “easily described as an accurate painted replica of the American flag, but . as hard to explain in its unsettling power as the reasonable illogicalities of a Duchamp readymade. 4 Is it blasphemous or respectful, simple-minded or recondite?” 5 Flag 1954–55 (dated on reverse 1954) Encaustic, oil, and collage on fabric mounted 1 on plywood, three panels, overall 42 ⁄4 x 5 60 ⁄8" (107.3 x 153.8 cm) The Museum of Modern Art, New York.
[Show full text]
Oral History Interview with Nan Rosenthal, 2010 June 28-July 12
Oral history interview with Nan Rosenthal, 2010 June 28-July 12 This interview is part of the Elizabeth Murray Oral History of Women in the Visual Arts Project, funded by the A G Foundation. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a recorded interview with Nan Rosenthal on 2010 June 28-July 12. The interview took place in New York, New York, and was conducted by Judith Richards for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. This interview is part of the Elizabeth Murray Oral History of Women in the Visual Arts Project. Nan Rosenthal reviewed the first half of the transcript before her death and made corrections and emendations. The reader should bear in mind that they are reading a transcript of spoken, rather than written, prose. Interview JUDITH RICHARDS: This is Judith Richards interviewing Nan Rosenthal on June 28 , 2010 in New York City for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution, disc one. So Nan, I'd like to start by asking you about your family background, certainly back to your grandparents and especially if you knew them and anything else you'd want to say. NAN ROSENTHAL: Let's see. They're quite different. They were all nonreligious, ethnic Jews. On my father's side, my great-grandfather came here in the 1880s or so. JUDITH RICHARDS: What was his name? NAN ROSENTHAL: [Laughs.] His name was Herman Rosenthal and he was a poet and a scholar of Slavic literature.
[Show full text]
MODERN ART and IDEAS 8 1962–1974 a Guide for Educators
MODERN ART AND IDEAS 8 1962–1974 A Guide for Educators Department of Education at The Museum of Modern Art MINIMALISM AND CONCEPTUALISM Artists included in this guide: John Baldessari, Joseph Beuys, Daniel Buren, Dan Flavin, Eva Hesse, Donald Judd, Yves Klein, Joseph Kosuth, Yayoi Kusama, Sol LeWitt, Gordon Matta-Clark, Robert Morris, Richard Serra, and Robert Smithson. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. A NOTE TO EDUCATORS 2. USING THE EDUCATOR GUIDE 3. SETTING THE SCENE 7. LESSONS Lesson One: Serial Forms/Material Difference Lesson Two: Language Arts Lesson Three: Constructing Space Lesson Four: Public Interventions Lesson Five: Performance into Art 34. FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION 36. GLOSSARY 39. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY AND RESOURCES 44. MoMA SCHOOL PROGRAMS No part of these materials may be reproduced or published in any form without prior written consent of The Museum of Modern Art. Design © 2007 The Museum of Modern Art, New York A NOTE TO EDUCATORS This is the eighth volume in the Modern Art and Ideas series for educators, which explores 1 the history of modern art through The Museum of Modern Art’s rich collection. While tra- A ditional art-historical categories are the organizing principle of the series, these parameters N O are used primarily as a means of exploring artistic developments and movements in con- T E junction with their social and historical contexts, with attention to the contributions of spe- T O cific artists. E D U C A This guide is informed by issues that arise from the selected works in a variety of mediums T O (painting, sculpture, collage, printmaking, photography, and, significantly, works that tran- R S scend the traditional division of mediums), but its organization and lesson topics are cre- ated with the school curriculum in mind, with particular application to social studies, visual art, history, and language arts.
[Show full text]
Jasper Johns and the Influence of Ludwig
JASPER JOHNS AND THE INFLUENCE OF LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN by PETER HIGGINSON B.A., University of British Columbia, 1972 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Fine Arts We accept this.thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July, 1974 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Depa rtment The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada ABSTRACT The influences upon Johns' work stem from varied fields of interests, ranging from Leonardo to John Cage, Hart Crane to Duchamp, Marshall McLuhan to Wittgenstein. The role that Wittgenstein's philosophy, plays has never been fully appreciated. What discussion has occurred - namely Max Kozloff's and Rosalind Krauss' - shows an inadequacy either through a lack of understanding or a super• ficiality towards the philosophical views. An in-depth analysis on this,, subject is invaluable in fully comprehending the ramifications of Johns' painting of the 60's. The intention of this paper is to examine Wittgenstein's influence and assess how his method of seeking out meaning in language is used by Johns in his paintings to explore meaning in art.
[Show full text]
From Louise About Not Writing “Hoping”
Excerpts from Some Historical Documents about Louise Lawler, Emily and Burton Tremaine and The Tremaine Collection, Arranged by Andrea Miller-Keller or “You’re going to love the thermostat next to the Miro.” Painting Toward Architecture/The Miller Company Collection of Abstract Art, 1948 (New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce). Acknowledgments by Emily Hall Tremaine, Art Director, The Miller Company; Foreword by Alfred H. Barr, Jr.; Text by Henry-Russell Hitchcock. (Copyright, 1948, The Miller Company, Meriden, Connecticut) [Founded in 1844, the enterprise “Joel Miller and Son” initially manufactured candle holders, lamp screws, and candle springs but soon turned to producing copper base alloys to support the manufacturing end of the lighting industry. In 1924, the Tremaine family acquired the company and changed the mill division of the company, now known as “The Miller Company,” to a non-captive mill, supplying specialty copper strip to mostly United States manufacturers.] The Miller Company Collection of Abstract Art has been assembled to illustrate with original examples: Abstract painting of the 20th century which has influenced the development of modern architecture. Contemporary abstract painting And sculpture of potential value to contemporary architects. Lighting, to the modern architect, is no longer an accessory but a major structural element designed into the building from the first. The Miller Company, as manufacturers of lighting equipment, in the design problems of modern architecture has led them to bring together and circulate nationally these works of art; some of which are of historical importance for the part they have already played, and all of which we hope may prove suggestive to contemporary architectural designers.
[Show full text]
The Role and the Nature of Repetition in Jasper Johns's Paintings in The
The Role and the Nature of Repetition in Jasper Johns’s Paintings in the Context of Postwar American Art by Ela Krieger A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Art History Approved Dissertation Committee Prof. Dr. Isabel Wünsche Jacobs University Bremen Prof. Dr. Paul Crowther Alma Mater Europaea Ljubljana Dr. Julia Timpe Jacobs University Bremen Date of Defense: 5 June 2019 Social Sciences and Humanities Abstract Abstract From the beginning of his artistic career, American artist Jasper Johns (b. 1930) has used various repetitive means in his paintings. Their significance in his work has not been sufficiently discussed; hence this thesis is an exploration of the role and the nature of repetition in Johns’s paintings, which is essential to better understand his artistic production. Following a thorough review of his paintings, it is possible to broadly classify his use of repetition into three types: repeating images and gestures, using the logic of printing, and quoting and returning to past artists. I examine each of these in relation to three major art theory elements: abstraction, autonomy, and originality. When Johns repeats images and gestures, he also reconsiders abstraction in painting; using the logic of printing enables him to follow the logic of another medium and to challenge the autonomy of painting; by quoting other artists, Johns is reexamining originality in painting. These types of repetition are distinct in their features but complementary in their mission to expand the boundaries of painting. The proposed classification system enables a better understanding of the role and the nature of repetition in the specific case of Johns’s paintings, and it enriches our understanding of the use of repetition and its perception in art in general.
[Show full text]
The Leo Castelli Gallery in Metro Magazine: American Approaches to Post-Abstract Figuration in an Italian Context
Copyright by Dorothy Jean McKetta 2012 The Thesis Committee for Dorothy Jean McKetta Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: The Leo Castelli Gallery in Metro Magazine: American Approaches to Post-Abstract Figuration in an Italian Context APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Richard Shiff John R. Clarke The Leo Castelli Gallery in Metro Magazine: American Approaches to Post-Abstract Figuration in an Italian Context by Dorothy Jean McKetta, B.A.; B.F.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin August 2012 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to Paolo Barucchieri (1935-2012). Thank you, Paolo, for sharing your Italy with me. Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the many people who have made this thesis possible. Thank you to the members of my thesis committee who attended my colloquium: Dr. Andrea Giunta, Dr. Linda Henderson, and Dr. Nassos Papalexandrou. All of your comments have helped to bring my topic into focus over the past few months. To my reader, Dr. John R. Clarke, thank you for encouraging me to write on Italy in the twentieth century, and for sharing your personal library so generously. And, of course, many thanks to Dr. Richard Shiff, my advisor, who suggested and that Metro magazine might help me find clues to Cy Twombly’s Roman milieu. Thank you for all your attention and trust. I would also like to acknowledge a few others who have helped along the way: Laura Schwartz, William Crain, Bob Penman, Maureen Howell, Jessamine Batario, my parents Randy and Terry McKetta.
[Show full text]
The Existence Or Non-Existence of a Contemporary Avant-Garde
THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF A CONTEMPORARY AVANT-GARDE A comparative research on historical avant-garde, neo avant-garde and contemporary art practices. Student: Claire Hoogakker Student number: 10246703 Supervisor: Dr. Gregor Langfeld Second reader: Dr. Miriam van Rijsingen Date: 13 July 2016 Amount of words: 21.313 MA Thesis Art History: Modern and Contemporary Art University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Art always was, and is, a force of protest of the humane against the pressure of domineering institutions … no less than it reflects their substance. - Theodor W. Adorno, Theses Upon Art and Religion Today, 1945. ! 1! Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Introduction 4 - 6 Theoretical Framework 6 - 7 Chapter 1: The Praxis of Life 8 - 23 The Historical Avant-Garde and The Praxis of Life 10 - 13 The Neo Avant-Garde and The Praxis of Life 13 - 17 Contemporary Artists and The Praxis of Life 18 - 23 Chapter 2: Medium Specificity 24 - 35 The Historical Avant-Garde and Medium Specificity 26 - 29 The Neo Avant-Garde and Medium Specificity 29 - 32 Contemporary Artists and Medium Specificity 32 - 35 Chapter 3: Institutional Critique 36 - 51 The Historical Avant-Garde and Institutional Critique 38 - 41 Neo Avant-Garde and Institutional Critique 41 - 46 Contemporary Artists and Institutional Critique 46 - 51 Conclusion 52 - 55 Bibliography 56 - 61 Lists of Images 62 - 106 Chapter 1: List of Images 62 - 77 Chapter 2: List of Images 78 - 93 Chapter 3: List of Images 94 - 106 ! 2! Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to sincerely thank my supervisor Dr. Gregor Langfeld for his time, his generous feedback and advice but most of all, for his trust in me and in this thesis.
[Show full text]