DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Issue 78

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Issue 78 Scottish Left Review Issue 78 September/October 2013 £2.00 September 18 A Year To Go Photo: Murdoch ferguson WHATEVER SCOTLAND’S FUTURE NO CUTS Janice Godrich National President Mark Serwotka General Secretary Lynn Henderson Scottish Secretary Public and Commercial Services Union | pcs.org.uk OY R R AL U M O A E I L V A S g r w .o ww.cwu 2 Scottish Left Review E: [email protected] Issue 78 September/October 2013 W: www.scottishleftreview.org Photo: Murdoch ferguson T: 0141 424 0042 Contents A: Scottish Left Review 741 Shields Road, Pollokshields Comment ........................... 3 A giant of the movement ..16 Glasgow G41 4PL A marathon, not a sprint ... 4 Len McCluskey Dennis Canavan A privatisation too far .......18 Editorial Committee John Brown Malcolm Balfour Henry McCubbin Better Together ................. 6 Cat Boyd David Miller Blair McDougall Democracy behind bars ....20 Moira Craig Gordon Morgan We will not disappear ........ 8 Lucy Blackburn Gregor Gall Tom Nairn Cat Boyd The not-working programme .22 Isobel Lindsay Jonathan Shafi John McAllion Pauline Bryan Tommy Sheppard Class, not nation ...............10 Robin McAlpine Elaine Smith Dave Watson Reviews ............................25 (Editor) Bob Thomson Peter McColl (Convener) Regret, bitterness, apathy ....14 Kick Up The Tabloids ........26 Michael Gray Printer by Clydeside Press Ltd, WHATEVER SCOTLAND’S FUTURE NO CUTS 37 High Street, Glasgow G1 1LX Janice Godrich National President Mark Serwotka General Secretary Lynn Henderson Scottish Secretary Comment Is utopia of any use in the modern world? Public and Commercial Services Union | pcs.org.uk e had planned that this issue something better than had we not tried. allegation that an independent Scotland Wof the Scottish Left Review Or, to put it more lyrically (in would be neoliberal by default? would have a sort-of ‘utopia/dystopia’ Samuel Beckett’s words): “Go on failing. To those who pose a federal solution theme linked to one year to go to the Go on. Only next time try to fail better.” to Britain and to those who believe referendum. The idea had been that by Promising an ideal future is patently that only class politics at a UK level OY asking different sides in the debate to ridiculous, but debating it makes us can change lives, how is that going to R R AL U M talk about the best and worst outcomes think about what it would look like happen? What mechanism leads to a O A they can imagine and by asking them to and how we might get there. These are federal Britain or to a radical reforming E I L talk about how these outcomes (in their both important questions - too many Westminster government? What does a V A views) can or would occur, it would help in the left have become adept at finding radical Westminster look like and what S people to think about the potential - the failure in everything but have not would it do? g both bad and good - to change Scotland’s properly engaged with the questions Yes, these are utopian questions. Yes, r ww .o future through their referendum vote. ‘what next? What now?’. they ask us to predict a future. But you w.cwu It hasn’t quite worked out like that. Whatever the independence debate are in politics - predicting a future better This is a shame - if for no other reason has done it has put those questions to us than today is your purpose. Or at least than that it rather scuppered the concept in stark terms. What next? What now? it should be. ‘It cannae work’ or ‘trust for our cover art... If we want to make our best choice we us, somehow it just will work’ are not But there is a strong reason not to need to think about what happens after good enough. Allowing some time for dismiss utopias altogether. As George that choice. If there is no consideration wounds to be licked, by the start of 2015 Bernard Shaw famously wrote, “a map of of what actions we take after 2014, we need a way forward in Scotland. If all the world that does not include Utopia we cede the future to others. All sides that remains is fragments of everyone’s is not worth even glancing at”. Utopia in the referendum campaign have a hopes lying useless around us as we have may quite literally mean ‘No Place’, but responsibility higher than winning. They deconstructed every possibility in a fit while it is no place that exists, that most have a responsibility to the future. of cynicism, replaced only with sage certainly doesn’t mean it has no place. So, to the Radical Independence comments about why we should all lower This is because we need to be Campaign, to the pro-independence our expectations, who then is victorious? able to think about the best possible groups advocating a ‘Common Weal’ At the Scottish Left Review we outcome if we want to think about our future; how do we achieve it? If there is will keep pressing both sides to talk us path forward. That you do not achieve a Yes vote, what practical, realistic and through their versions of the immediate everything you’d like to is the curse of effective steps can be taken to make future and how this takes us to the land humanity’s ability to imagine things that an independent Scotland something they believe we deserve. We take our do not exist. Of course we fail in our different from the neoliberal mess in idealism with a dose of reality and visa biggest ambitions, but in the process of which we find ourselves? Can you versa. Surely we deserve nothing less than failing, hopefully we manage to create mount a serious argument to counter the an answer? 3 A marathon not a sprint ver the past year, the YesScotland the conclusion that Westminster is increasingly different from the preferred OCampaign team has been working completely out of touch with the agenda of most Scots. This divergence of hard to win the argument about people of Scotland, whereas the Scottish agenda has been going on now for some independence. Opinion polls suggest Parliament responds more readily to the time. that we have much more work to do but values, the needs and the aspirations of I recently came across an old this campaign is like running a marathon the people of Scotland. election leaflet which was used by me rather than a short sprint. On issues like land reform, free as a Labour candidate during the 1979 Over the next twelve months, care for the elderly, financial support for General Election Campaign. It began: we aim to redouble our efforts to win students and free prescriptions for people “The result of this election will the hearts and minds of the people who are ill, the Scottish Parliament has determine the kind of society we of Scotland by persuading them that proved to be far more radical and far shall have for many years to come. independence will improve their lives. Of more progressive than Westminster. Do we want a greedy, grasping rat- course, we have a massive job to convert If the Scottish Parliament can be race where only the strongest survive enough people to our cause but I have responsible for important things like and the weakest go to the wall? Or every confidence that our YesScotland Education and the National Health do we want a caring, sharing society team is up for it. Service, why should it not be responsible based on the principle that most I myself am a convert to the cause for deciding whether we should have help should go to those who are and my conversion is not based on nuclear weapons or whether we should most in need?” emotion. It is based on my experience, be involved in illegal wars or whether In that General Election, Scotland voted particularly my Parliamentary we should allow bankers to ruin our for the latter option. The UK as a whole experience. Having spent 26 years as a economy ? voted for the former. We all got a Prime Member of the Westminster Parliament At present, too many important Minister who told us that there is no and eight years as a Member of the decisions are taken at Westminster but such thing as society. Scottish Parliament, I have come to the Westminster agenda is becoming In twelve months time the people “A coherent vision of a wealthier, fairer, more equal Scotland” - the Herald The independence referendum is a once in a lifetime opportunity to re-imagine and reshape Scotland. In the few months since the Jimmy Reid Foundation launched the Common Weal project, we’ve moved our vision of a high wage economy with universal benefits to the centre of the debate about Scotland’s future. Now, with the referendum just over a year away, we need your help to make the vision a reality. We’ll be publishing a series of reports mapping Scotland’s path to a fair society with a strong, high wage economy. We need your support: You can donate on our online indiegogo campaign: http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the- common-weal-we-need-you-to-build-a-better-scotland/x/4518115 If you would prefer to contribute by post, you can send a cheque to The Jimmy Reid Foundation, PO Box 8781, Biggar ML12 6AG. www.scottishcommonweal.org 4 We asked both YesScotland and Better Together to contribute articles on the state of the independence campaign so far. Dennis Canavan writes for YesScotland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Issue
    Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 £2.00 Comment Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 t is difficult to maintain constitutional Ineutrality at this tail-end of 2013. Of course we will continue to do our best to keep the SLR open as a space for Contents anyone on the Scottish left, a place where they can feel at home and contribute Comment .......................................................2 to a debate that stretches beyond the boundaries of party or constitutional Democracy in writing ....................................4 position. That is our duty as a magazine Jean Urquhart created expressly for that purpose. Solid foundations for change .........................6 But the duty lies not only on us to Michael Keating keep that space open but on all sides to fill that space. Because it can surely not Our share of the future ..................................8 be possible for us to face the desolation Robin McAlpine which lies across Scottish society in the dog-days of this unlucky year without Graveyard or get-together ..........................10 some sort of answer to what lies all Isobel Lindsay around us. Welfare Nation State ...................................12 What answer to Grangemouth? John McInally Facile talk of ‘the need to work together’ is an insult to the collective intelligence. Labour and the trade unions .......................14 All it states is that if we keep the fork Gregor Gall, Richard Leonard, Bob Crow and let others keep the knife, it will be impossible for us to eat on our own. That Real energy answers ...................................18 may not be a bad thing, but someone Andy Cumbers needs to explain why.
    [Show full text]
  • Apprentice Strikes in Twentieth Century UK Engineering and Shipbuilding*
    Apprentice strikes in twentieth century UK engineering and shipbuilding* Paul Ryan Management Centre King’s College London November 2004 * Earlier versions of this paper were presented to the International Conference on the European History of Vocational Education and Training, University of Florence, the ESRC Seminar on Historical Developments, Aims and Values of VET, University of Westminster, and the annual conference of the British Universities Industrial Relations Association. I would like to thank Alan McKinlay and David Lyddon for their generous assistance, and Lucy Delap, Alan MacFarlane, Brian Peat, David Raffe, Alistair Reid and Keith Snell for comments and suggestions; the Engineering Employers’ Federation and the Department of Education and Skills for access to unpublished information; the staff of the Modern Records Centre, Warwick, the Mitchell Library, Glasgow, the Caird Library, Greenwich, and the Public Record Office, Kew, for assistance with archive materials; and the Nuffield Foundation and King’s College, Cambridge for financial support. 2 Abstract Between 1910 and 1970, apprentices in the engineering and shipbuilding industries launched nine strike movements, concentrated in Scotland and Lancashire. On average, the disputes lasted for more than five weeks, drawing in more than 15,000 young people for nearly two weeks apiece. Although the disputes were in essence unofficial, they complemented sector-wide negotiations by union officials. Two interpretations are considered: a political-social-cultural one, emphasising political motivation and youth socialisation, and an economics-industrial relations one, emphasising collective action and conflicting economic interests. Both interpretations prove relevant, with qualified priority to the economics-IR one. The apprentices’ actions influenced economic outcomes, including pay structures and training incentives, and thereby contributed to the decline of apprenticeship.
    [Show full text]
  • Heroes of Peace Profiles of the Scottish Peace Campaigners Who Opposed the First World War
    Heroes of Peace Profiles of the Scottish peace campaigners who opposed the First World War a paper from the Introduction The coming year will see many attempts to interpret the First World War as a ‘just’ war with the emphasis on the heroic sacrifice of troops in the face of an evil enemy. No-one is questioning the bravery or the sacrifice although the introduction of conscription sixteen months after the start of the war meant that many of the men who fought did not do so from choice and once in the armed forces they had to obey orders or be shot. Even many of the volunteers in the early stages of the war signed up on the assumption that it would all be over in a few months with few casualties. We want to ensure that there is an alternative – and we believe more valid – interpretation of the events of a century ago made available to the public. This was a war in which around ten million young men were killed on the battlefield in four years, about 120,000 of them were Scottish. Proportionately Scotland suffered the highest number of war dead apart from Serbia and Turkey. It was described as the ‘war to end wars’ but instead it created the conditions for the rise of Hitler and the Second World War just twenty years later as a result of the very harsh terms imposed on Germany and the determination to humiliate the losing states. It also contributed to some of the current problems in the Middle East since, as part of the war settlement, Britain and France took ownership of large parts of the Ottoman Empire and divided up the territory with no reference to the identities and interests of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • We Can Be Heroes Just for One Day
    ASLEFJOURNAL SEPTEMBER 2019 The magazine of the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers & Firemen We can be heroes just for one day Standing by the wall I will be king & you, you will be queen And the guns shot above our heads For ever and ever And the shame was on the other side. We can beat them... The train drivers ’ Inside: Palestine; Pride; Michael Green; and Tolpuddle 2019 union since 1880 GS Mick Whelan ASLEFJOURNAL SEPTEMBER 2019 Chaos and confusion The magazine of the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers & Firemen E HAVE never been in the W game of having preferences in contractual negotiations for franchises, even having different standards of Mick: ‘It’s the old cap industrial relations and collar process’ within certain groups. Our issue is, and always has been, with the model. Never has this been clearer than now, when we might have expected 10 a period of calm after Mr Grayling going and Mr 12 Shapps taking over. Alas, that is not the case. Confusion reigns. News The number of questions we have had over what has been announced continues to grow. l Rail fares rise again; and steam train blues 4 Apparently, Southeastern is to be run again as l Railway Workers’ Centenary Service; and 5 the conditions aren’t right; Stagecoach and Arriva Off the Rails: Patrick Flanery; Bev Quist; can take legal action over being excluded. Then Kim Darroch; and Christopher Meyer First Trenitalia wins the former Virgin bid because it meets Williams – a report we have not yet had – Cyril Power’s Tube train pictures on show 6 l and contains element of the old cap and collar l Kevin Lindsay hails a victory in Scotland 7 process that means the franchisee cannot lose.
    [Show full text]
  • Foi-18-00465
    ANNEX ANNEX Case Number Summary of Case Decision Exemption/Exception applied FoI/16/01789 Correspondence including emails in relation to The Partial 30(b)(i);30(b)(ii);38(1)(b); Council Tax Reduction (Scotland) Amendment (No. 2) Release Regulations 2016 since 18 October 2016. FoI/16/01829 To provide written information on the development of Partial camping management byelaws by loch Lomond and Release The Trossachs National Park or Scottish Ministers FoI/16/01842 Request for access to a file HH51/460 Refuse 31(1); FoI/16/01845 Details of contracts Scottish Government has with Partial 17;25;33(1)(b);38(1)(b); Warmworks Scotland & Energy Saving Trust Release FoI/16/01866 No of claims received in the last 3 years for damage to Partial 17; cars arising from potholes on A75, A77 & A76. How Release many claims were approved and the annual amount of compensation paid, how many were rejected and how many are to be resolved FoI/16/01873 All communications held by TS relating to accidents, Partial R10(4)(a);R10(4)(d);R11( design, inspections, reviews, investigations or safety Release 2); concerns for the A825 between Creagan and Benderloch from January 2015 FoI/16/01874 Correspondence, minutes of meetings and other Partial 25;30(b)(i); communications between the Scottish Government Release and Transport Scotland and Network Rail, local authorities or SPT regarding (a) Glasgow Crossrail and (b) electrification of the East Kilbride line. FoI/16/01876 training in NRs surrounding civil registration Partial 17; Release FoI/16/01877 Information on setting in Scottish schools.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I15 March April 03.Indd
    scottishleftreview comment Issue 15 March/April 2003 A journal of the left in Scotland brought about since the formation of the t is one of those questions that the partial-democrats Scottish Parliament in July 1999 Imock, but it has never been more crucial; what is your vote for? Too much of our political culture in Britain Contents (although this is changing in Scotland) still sees a vote Comment ...............................................................2 as a weapon of last resort. Democracy, for the partial- democrat, is about giving legitimacy to what was going Vote for us ..............................................................4 to happen anyway. If what was going to happen anyway becomes just too much for the public to stomach (or if Bill Butler, Linda Fabiani, Donald Gorrie, Tommy Sheridan, they just tire of the incumbents or, on a rare occasion, Robin Harper are actually enthusiastic about an alternative choice) then End of the affair .....................................................8 they can invoke their right of veto and bring in the next lot. Tommy Sheppard, Dorothy Grace Elder And then it is back to business as before. Three million uses for a second vote ..................11 Blair is the partial-democrat par excellence. There are David Miller two ways in which this is easily recognisable. The first, More parties, more choice?.................................14 and by far the most obvious, is the manner in which he Isobel Lindsay views international democracy. In Blair’s world view, the If voting changed anything...................................16 purpose of the United Nations is not to make a reasoned, debated, democratic decision but to give legitimacy to the Robin McAlpine actions of the powerful.
    [Show full text]
  • Eet/S4/14/10/A Economy, Energy And
    EET/S4/14/10/A ECONOMY, ENERGY AND TOURISM COMMITTEE AGENDA 10th Meeting, 2014 (Session 4) Wednesday 2 April 2014 The Committee will meet at 9.30 am in Committee Room 4. 1. Scotland's Economic Future Post-2014: The Committee will take evidence from— Iain McMillan, CBE, Director, CBI Scotland; Owen Kelly, OBE, Chief Executive, Scottish Financial Enterprise; David Watt, Regional Director, Institute of Directors Scotland; Colin Borland, Head of External Affairs, Scotland, Federation of Small Businesses; Garry Clarke, Head of Policy and Public Affairs, Scottish Chambers of Commerce; and then from— Stephen Boyd, Assistant Secretary, Scottish Trades Union Congress; Professor Mike Danson, Professor of Enterprise Policy, Heriot-Watt University; Robin McAlpine, Director, Jimmy Reid Foundation. 2. Scotland's Economic Future Post-2014- Review of evidence heard (in private): The Committee will review the evidence heard at today's meeting. EET/S4/14/10/A Fergus Cochrane Clerk to the Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee Room T2.60 The Scottish Parliament Edinburgh Tel: 0131 348 5230 Email: [email protected] EET/S4/14/10/A The papers for this meeting are as follows— Agenda item 1 Note from the clerk EET/S4/14/10/1 PRIVATE PAPER EET/S4/14/10/2 (P) EET/S4/14/10/1 Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee 10th Meeting, 2014 (Session 4), Wednesday, 2 April 2014 Scotland’s Economic Future Post-2014 Introduction 1. This paper provides background information for the Committee’s sixth evidence session of its inquiry into Scotland’s economic future post 2014. The theme for this session is ‘economic sectors, regulation, trade, labour markets’.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Leftreview
    ScottishLeft Review Issue 96 November/December 2016 - £2.00 'best re(a)d' 1 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 96 November/December 2016 LRD TUC Sept15_Layout 1 10/07/2015 14:09 Page 1 FIGHT ANTI-UNION LAWS www.rmt.org.uk General Secretary: Mick Cash President President: PSeaneter P iHoylenkney ASLEF CALLS FOR AN INTEGRATED, PUBLICLY OWNED, ACCOUNTABLE RAILWAY FOR SCOTLAND (which used to be the SNP’s position – before they became the government!) Mick Whelan Tosh McDonald Kevin Lindsay General Secretary President Scottish Ocer ASLEF the train drivers union- www.aslef.org.uk 2 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 96 November/December 2016 feedback comment Back to the future and forward to the past he Jimmy Reid Foundation, the Foundation, it was my duty and Labour (instead of Blair, Brown and sister organisation of Scottish honour to give the vote of thanks Miliband, and the array of Scottish TLeft Review, held its annual at the end of the lecture. I took the Labour leaders – Dewar, McLeish, lecture on Thursday 6 October. This opportunity to say that I was sure that McConnell, Gray, Alexander, Lamont, year, the fourth annual lecture, was Jimmy Reid would have welcomed reviews Murphy and now Dugdale). Corbyn’s given by Jeremy Corbyn. He received Jeremy’s election and re-election to refusal to support independence a rapturous reception before he had the leadership of the Labour party. would not have been such an issue in uttered a word and then afterwards a This was for various reasons, all these circumstances as it would have standing ovation from the majority of centred around the point that Corbyn been counter-balanced by his more the 600-odd people gathered in the is the Labour leader that many on the left-wing policies so that far fewer Govan Old Parish Church that night.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Leftreview
    ScottishLeft Review Issue 103 January/February 2018 - £2.00 'best re(a)d' PLUS: PFI/PPP scandal in North Ayrshire I Universal Credit Politics in Germany after their election I and more ... 1 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 103 January/February 2018 ASLEF CALLS FOR AN INTEGRATED, PUBLICLY OWNED, ACCOUNTABLE RAILWAY FOR SCOTLAND (which used to be the SNP’s position – before they became the government!) Mick Whelan Tosh McDonald Kevin Lindsay General Secretary President Scottish Ocer ASLEF the train drivers union- www.aslef.org.uk 2 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 103 January/February 2018 feedback comment 2018: here we go cottish Left Review wholeheartedly interview with Richard, we have asked campaign, it became clear that Leonard welcomes the election of Richard others to lay out their perspectives on did not command a majority of support SLeonard to the leadership of what difference his election makes and from his parliamentary colleagues in Scottish Labour. As outlined in the last what difference he may make in future. the 24 strong Labour group at Holyrood. editorial, his election was we argued to Indeed, the composition of his front He won by a sizable margin (57% to 43%) be a benefit to all of the left in the age bench team reflects this, with the likes of overall but not amongst individual party of the hegemony of austerity and neo- Jackie Ballie, Sarwar and Iain Gray in its members (52% to 48%) or registered liberalism. How much worse off the left ranks. supporters (48% to 52%), indicating that reviews would have been without his election despite progress being made the right is What this all means is that the task can be gleaned when one considers not still a considerable force within Scottish of Scottish Labour under Leonard’s just his competitor’s personal behaviour Labour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Independence Referendum and After
    THE SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM AND AFTER Michael Keating Professor of Politics at the University of Aberdeen, and director of the Centre on Constitutional Change SUMMARY: The Scottish Dilemma. – Constitutional Traditions in Scotland. – The Na- tionalists in Government. – The Battle Ground. – Economy and Finance. – Welfare. – Defence and Security. – Europe. – The Campaign. – The Outcome. – The Aftermath. – The Smith Report. – EVEL and Barnett. – The European Context. – The Future of the State. – Abstract – Resum – Resumen. The Scottish Dilemma The Scottish independence referendum on 18 September 2014 was a highly unusual event, an agreed popular vote on secession in an advanced industrial democracy. The result, with 45 per cent for in- dependence and 55 per cent against, might seem to have settled the question decisively. Yet, paradoxically, it is the losing side that has emerged in better shape and more optimistic, while the winners have been plunged into difficulties. In order to understand what has hap- pened, we need to examine the referendum in light of the evolution of the United Kingdom and the changing place of Scotland within it. Scotland should be seen as a case of the kind of spatial rescaling that is taking place more generally across Europe, as new forms of state- hood and of sovereignty evolve. Scottish public opinion favours more self-government but no longer recognizes the traditional nation-state model presented in the referendum question. Article received 12/12/2014; approved 12/12/2014. 73 REAF núm. 21, abril 2015, p. 73-98 Michael Keating Constitutional Traditions in Scotland Since the late nineteenth century union, there have been three main constitutional traditions in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 47, September 2018
    1 No. 47, September 2018 Editors: L. Görke – Prof. Dr. K. P. Müller – R. Walker Scottish Studies Newsletter 47, September 2018 2 Table of Contents Scottish Studies Newsletter 47, Sept 2018 Editorial 3 Scotland and the Turmoil of Brexit - A. L. Kennedy, "A toxic culture" 6 - Iain MacWhirter, "How to win Indyref 2? Keep it simple" 8 - "Sir Ivan Rogers' letter to staff in full" 11 Exchange students' reports - Josip Brekalo / Marco Giovanazzi, 14 "People make Glasgow" - A report from the perspective of two exchange students - Simona Hildebrand, "Fuireach anns an Dùn Eideann – Living in Edinburgh" 15 - Marsida Toska, "Edinburgh, my Love!" 16 - Jessica Völkel, "Autumn in Edinburgh" 18 Britain after the Brexit Decision Klaus Peter Müller, "The State of Britain 2018 - 2021: All Out War and Overall Bankruptcy" 19 Common Weal, "Scottish National Investment Bank Success" 41 New Scottish Poetry: Peter McCarey 43 Ian McGhee (Secretary, The John Galt Society), John Galt – Observer and Recorder 43 Stewart Whyte, Swithering Whytes or What to do with a troublesome cat? 47 (New) Media on Scotland 49 Education Scotland 104 Scottish Award Winners 114 New Publications March 2016 – February 2018 114 Book Reviews Peter Auger on Barbour's 'Bruce' and its Cultural Contexts 135 Chelsea Hartlen on Women and Violent Crime in Enlightenment Scotland 137 Richie McCaffery on Scotland in Europe / Europe in Scotland: … 139 James M. Morris on Facts and Inventions: Selections from the Journalism of J. Boswell 140 Klaus Peter Müller on Sir Walter Scott. A Life in Story 142 Carla Sassi on Opium and Empire: The Lives and Careers of W.
    [Show full text]
  • D21 Programme5.Indd
    DEMOCRACY 21: Let’s Build a Democracy Fit for the 21st Century DEM Welcome Thank you for attending Democracy 21 and taking an active interest in the future of Scottish democracy. This conference starts with the premise that people should have collective OCR power to make good things happen for themselves and their communities and to stop bad things happening. This is a simple definition of power. Democracy is the most equal distribution of that power possible. By bringing together community groups, democratic innovators, academics, legislators, local and national politicians, civil servants, civil society activists, community organisers, political activists, futurists, artists and creators we can collectively discuss the challenges for democracy today. We hope this will be a space for generating innovative ideas ACY about how we can make a better democracy. Today is also the launch of a declaration, developed by and for community activists, that will shape the Local Democracy Bill to advance an ambitious plan for local government reform. 21 Let’s build a democracy fit for the 21st Century. How did we get here? Scotland is a great teacher about modern politics. The politics here is more open and inclusive than it is in Westminster and we think that is partly to do with better electoral systems. We also know that being better at democracy than Westminster is not getting over a particularly high bar. Scotland does not escape the inequality, confusion and precariousness that is fuelling volatility across the globe, which forms the backdrop to the discussions that we will have today. This makes it clear to us that democracy is not only about elections.
    [Show full text]