DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 231/Monday, December

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 231/Monday, December Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2002 / Proposed Rules 71493 Citation the occupant 10 seconds after its one or more blade fragments. The The authority citation for these deployment. actions specified by the proposed AD special conditions is as follows: 7. For the purpose of complying with are intended to prevent centrifugal HIRF and lightning requirements, the compressor intake wheel blade cracks, Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and inflatable seatbelt system is considered which can result in in-flight engine 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.101 for STC or a ‘‘critical system’’ if its deployment power loss or shutdown. 21.17 for TC; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19. could have a hazardous effect on the DATES: Comments must be received by The Proposed Special Conditions airplane; otherwise, it is considered an January 31, 2003. The FAA has determined that this ‘‘essential’’ system. ADDRESSES: Submit comments in project will be accomplished on the 8. It must be shown that the inflatable triplicate to the Federal Aviation basis of not lowering the current level seatbelt will not release hazardous Administration (FAA), New England of safety for the Air Tractor Model AT– quantities of gas or particulate matter Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 401, –402, –502, –602, and –802 series into the cabin. Attention: Rules Docket No. 99–NE–12– 9. The inflatable seatbelt installation occupant restraint design. Accordingly, AD, 12 New England Executive Park, must be protected from the effects of fire the (FAA) proposes the following Burlington, MA 01803–5299. Comments such that no hazard to occupants will special conditions as part of the type may be inspected at this location, by result. certification basis for Air Tractor series appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 10. There must be a means to verify airplanes AT–401, AT–402, AT–502, p.m., Monday through Friday, except the integrity of the inflatable seatbelt AT–602, and AT–802 modified by Federal holidays. Comments may also activation system before each flight or it Goodrich Aircraft Interior Products. be sent via the Internet using the must be demonstrated to reliably following address: 9-ane- 4-Point Inflatable Restraints for operate between inspection intervals. [email protected]. Comments sent 11. A life limit needs to be established Agricultural Airplanes via the Internet must contain the docket for appropriate system designs. 1. It must be shown that the inflatable number in the subject line. 12. Qualification testing of the seatbelt will deploy and provide The service information referenced in internal firing mechanism must be protection under crash conditions the proposed rule may be obtained from accomplished using the vibration levels where it is necessary to prevent serious Turbomeca, 40220 Tarnos, France; appropriate for an agricultural airplane. injury. A dynamic test is required to telephone (33) 05 59 64 40 00; fax (33) verify that the system operates as Michael Gallagher, 05 59 64 60 80. This information may intended when subjected to the 26 G Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft be examined, by appointment, at the deceleration pulse described in Certification Service. FAA, New England Region, Office of the § 23.562(b)(2). The dynamic test need [FR Doc. 02–30325 Filed 11–29–02; 8:45 am] Regional Counsel, 12 New England only be performed using a 50 percentile BILLING CODE 4910–13–M Executive Park, Burlington, MA. male ATD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2. The means of protection must take Antonio Cancelliere, Aerospace into consideration a range of stature DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Engineer, Engine Certification Office, from a 5 percentile female to a 95 FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, percentile male. The inflatable seatbelt Federal Aviation Administration 12 New England Executive Park, must provide a consistent level of Burlington, MA 01803–5299; telephone energy absorption throughout that 14 CFR Part 39 (781) 238–7751; fax (781) 238–7199. range. [Docket No. 99–NE–12–AD] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 3. The design must prevent the inflatable seatbelt from either being RIN 2120–AA64 Comments Invited incorrectly buckled or incorrectly Interested persons are invited to Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca installed, or both, such that the airbag participate in the making of the Turmo IV A and Turmo IV C Series would not properly deploy. proposed rule by submitting such Turboshaft Engines 4. It must be shown that an written data, views, or arguments as inadvertent deployment does not cause AGENCY: Federal Aviation they may desire. Communications an unsafe condition (or hazard to the Administration, DOT. should identify the Rules Docket airplane). Consideration needs to be ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking number and be submitted in triplicate to given as a result of wear and tear, or (NPRM). the address specified above. All inertial loads resulting from in-flight or communications received on or before ground maneuvers (including gusts and SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation the closing date for comments, specified hard landings), likely to be experienced Administration (FAA) proposes to adopt above, will be considered before taking in service. The seat belt must have the a new airworthiness directive (AD) that action on the proposed rule. The same strength capability after the is applicable to Turbomeca Turmo IV A proposals contained in this notice may inflatable portion of the restraint has and IV C series turboshaft engines. This be changed in light of the comments been deployed. proposal would require initial and received. 5. It must be shown that deployment repetitive borescope and eddy current or Comments are specifically invited on of the device is not hazardous to the ultrasonic inspections of centrifugal the overall regulatory, economic, occupant. In addition, the seated compressor intake wheel blades for environmental, and energy aspects of occupant must not be injured as cracks and evidence of corrosion pitting, the proposed rule. All comments established by criteria in § 23.562 as a and, if found cracked or if there is submitted will be available, both before result of the inflatable seatbelt evidence of corrosion pitting, and after the closing date for comments, deployment, including keeping the lap replacement with serviceable parts. This in the Rules Docket for examination by belt located on the pelvis. proposal is prompted by reports of interested persons. A report 6. It must be shown that the inflatable cracked centrifugal compressor intake summarizing each FAA-public contact seatbelt will not impede rapid egress of wheel blades, resulting in the release of concerned with the substance of this VerDate 0ct<31>2002 16:38 Nov 29, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\02DEP1.SGM 02DEP1 71494 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2002 / Proposed Rules proposal will be filed in the Rules operation in the United States under the For the reasons discussed above, I Docket. provisions of Section 21.29 of the certify that this proposed regulation (1) Commenters wishing the FAA to Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ acknowledge receipt of their comments 21.29) and the applicable bilateral under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not submitted in response to this notice airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT must submit a self-addressed, stamped this bilateral airworthiness agreement, Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 postcard on which the following the DGAC has kept the FAA informed FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if statement is made: ‘‘Comments to of the situation described above. The promulgated, will not have a significant Docket Number 99–NE–12–AD.’’ The FAA has examined the findings of the economic impact, positive or negative, postcard will be date stamped and DGAC, reviewed all available on a substantial number of small entities returned to the commenter. information, and determined that AD under the criteria of the Regulatory Availability of NPRM’s action is necessary for products of this Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft type design that are certificated for regulatory evaluation prepared for this Any person may obtain a copy of this operation in the United States. action is contained in the Rules Docket. NPRM by submitting a request to the A copy of it may be obtained by Proposed Requirements of This AD FAA, New England Region, Office of the contacting the Rules Docket at the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Since an unsafe condition has been location provided under the caption Docket No. 99–NE–12–AD, 12 New identified that is likely to exist or ADDRESSES. England Executive Park, Burlington, MA develop on other products of this same List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 01803–5299. type design, the proposed AD would Discussion require: Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation • Initial and repetitive borescope and safety, Safety. The Direction Generale de L’Aviation eddy current or ultrasonic inspections Civile (DGAC), which is the The Proposed Amendment of centrifugal compressor intake wheel airworthiness authority for France, blades for cracks and evidence of Accordingly, pursuant to the recently notified the FAA that an unsafe corrosion pitting; and authority delegated to me by the condition may exist on Turbomeca Administrator, the Federal Aviation • Replacement with serviceable parts Turmo IV A and IV C series turboshaft Administration proposes to amend part if found cracked or if there is evidence engines. The DGAC advises that they 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations of corrosion pitting. have received reports of cracked (14 CFR part 39) as follows: centrifugal compressor intake wheel At this time there is no modification blades. The phenomena of blade available as terminating action; as the PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS cracking occurs in two phases; initiation investigation is ongoing into the cause DIRECTIVES after a single event, such as foreign of crack initiation, future rulemaking 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decision 2005/07/R
    DECISION No 2005/07/R OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY of 19-12-2005 amending Decision No 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Regulation) and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agency”), and in particular Articles 13 and 14 thereof. Having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 28 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks.2 Whereas: (1) Annex IV Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part- 66 Appendix 1 Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence (hereinafter referred to as Part-66 AMC Appendix I) is required to be up to date to serve as reference for the national aviation authorities. (2) To achieve this requirement the text of Part-66 AMC Appendix I should be amended regularly to add new aircraft type rating. (3) The regular amendment of Part-66 AMC Appendix I is considered as a permanent rulemaking task for the Agency. This decision represents the first update according to an accelerated procedure accepted by AGNA and SSCC.
    [Show full text]
  • CRD) to Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03-2006
    Comment Response Document (CRD) to Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03-2006 for amending the Executive Director Decision No. 2005/07/R of 19 December 2005 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks APPENDIX I AIRCRAFT TYPE RATINGS FOR PART-66 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE LICENCE CRD to NPA 03/2006 Explanatory Note I. General 1. The purpose of the Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03/2006, dated 20 April 2006 was to propose an amendment to Decision N° 2005/07/R of the Executive Director of the Agency of 19 December 2005 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (ED Decision 2005/07/R). II. Consultation 2. The draft Executive Director Decision (ED Decision) amending ED Decision 2005/07/R was published on the web site (www.easa.europa.eu) on 21 April 2006. By the closing date of 2 June 2006, European Aviation Safety Agency (the Agency) had received 107 comments from 20 National Aviation Authorities, professional organisations and private companies. III. Publication of the CRD 3. All comments received have been acknowledged and incorporated into a Comment Response Document (CRD). This CRD contains a list of all persons and/or organisations that have provided comments and the answers of the Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 2008/003/R 11/07/2008
    ED Decision 2008/003/R 11/07/2008 European Aviation Safety Agency DECISION NO 2008/003/R OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY of 11 July 2008 amending Appendix I Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence to Annex IV Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part-66 of Decision No. 2003/19/RM1 of the Executive Director of the Agency of 28 November 2003 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY, Having regard to the regulation (EC) No 216/20082 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 18 and 19 thereof. Having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/20033 of 20 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks. Whereas: (1) Appendix I Aircraft type ratings of Annex IV Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part-66 of Decision No. 2003/19/RM (hereinafter referred to as Part-66 AMC Appendix I) is required to be up to date to serve as reference for the national aviation authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to Decision 2015/020/R
    Annex to ED Decision 2015/020/R The text of the amendment is arranged to show deleted, new or amended text as shown below: — deleted text is marked with strike through; — new or amended text is highlighted in grey; and — an ellipsis (…) indicates that the remaining text is unchanged in front of or following the reflected amendment. Appendix I to Annex IV to ED Decision 2003/019/RM is hereby amended as follows: APPENDIX I AIRCRAFT TYPE RATINGS FOR PART-66 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE LICENCES The following aircraft type ratings should be used to ensure a common standard throughout the Member States. The inclusion of an aircraft type in the licence does not indicate that the aircraft type has been granted a type certificate under the Basic Regulation and its Implementing Rules,; this list is only intended for the maintenance purposes. In order to keep this list current and the type ratings consistent, such information should be first passed on to the Agency using the Rulemaking Enquiry form (http://easa.europa.eu/webgate/rulemaking-enquiry/) in case a Member State needs to issue a type rating that is not included in this list. Notes on when the licences should be modified: When a modification is introduced by this Decision to an aircraft type rating or to an engine designation in the rating which affect licences already issued, the ratings on the Aircraft Maintenance Licences (AMLs) may be modified at the next renewal or when the licence is reissued, unless there is an urgent reason to modify the licence. Notes on aircraft modified by Supplemental Type Certificate (STC): It is not the intention of this document to include all aircraft modified by STCs because a great number of STCs were approved before 2003 and are unknown to the Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • EASA-European Aviation Safety Agency
    Standards Manager Web Standards List EASA-European Aviation Safety Agency Id Number Title Year Organization Page 1 AD 2018-0161 ATA 53 - Fuselage - Trimmable Horizontal Stabilizer Support Struts - Inspection 2018 EASA 2 PART-SPO AMC/GM to Part-SPO Amendment 10 - Annex V to Decision 2018/003/R 2018 EASA AMC & GM AMD 10 3 AD 2018- ATA 38 - Water/Waste - Forward Fuselage Shrouded Pipe T-Boxes And Clamps - Replacement 2018 EASA 0111R1 4 CS-25 AMD 22 CS-25 Amendment 22 - Change Information 2018 EASA CI 5 EC 2018/401 Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/401 Amending Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 As Regards The Classification Of 2018 EASA Runways 6 AD 2018-0247 ATA 34 Navigation Transponders Inspection / Modification 2018 EASA 7 AD 2018-0228 ATA 71 - Power Plant - Engine Air Inlet Cowl Inner Barrel Lower Panels - Inspection / Replacement 2018 EASA 8 AD 2018-0236- Emergency AD - ATA 32 Landing Gear Emergency Flotation Unit Inspection / Replacement Rotorcraft Flight Manual / 2018 EASA E Master Minimum Equipment List Temporary Revision 9 TOR Terms of Reference for rulemaking task - RAMP Deregulation - Issue 1 2018 EASA RMT.0721 10 TCDS BA.013 Type-Certificate Data Sheet - Cameron Balloons Ltd. - Manned Free Hot Air Balloons - Issue 18 2018 EASA 11 TCD SN Type-Certificate Data Sheet For Noise - Textron Aviation Inc. - Cessna 525 Series (Citation) - Issue 12 2018 EASA IM.A.078 12 TCDS Type-Certificate Data Sheet - Textron Aviation Inc. - Beechcraft 33, 35, 36 (Bonanza) - Issue 03 2018 EASA IM.A.279 13 TCDS Type-Certificate Data sheet - Lycoming Engines
    [Show full text]
  • ACP 34 Volume 2 Air Ll.Pmd
    Uncontrolled Copy Not Subject To Amendment air cadet publication ACP 34 aircraft operation volume 2 - airmanship Il Revision 1.02 Uncontrolled Copy Not Subject To Amendment Amendment List Date Amended by Incorporated No Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 i Revision 1.02 Uncontrolled Copy Not Subject To Amendment ACP 34 AIRCRAFT OPERATION CONTENTS Volume 1 .................. Airmanship l Volume 2................. Airmanship ll Volume 3 .................. Aircraft Handling Volume 4.................. Operational Flying Volume 2 Airmanship ll Chapter 1 ................. Air Traffice Control. Chapter 2 ................. Rules of the Air. Chapter 3 ................. Aircraft Knowledge. Instructors’ Guide ISSUED 2005 ii Revision 1.02 Uncontrolled Copy Not Subject To Amendment iii Revision 1.02 Uncontrolled Copy Not Subject To Amendment AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL CHAPTER 1 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Introduction ATC, ATCC & ATCRU 1. At Royal Air Force airfields all movements of aircraft, both on the ground and in the air, are monitored and controlled by a vital service known as Air Traffic Control (ATC). The ATC controllers and supporting staff operate from the “control tower”, and they communicate with the aircrew by radio telephony (RT). In the tower will be aerodrome controllers for aircraft on the ground and in the circuit, and approach controllers for aircraft that are outside the circuit, but within the airfield’s area of responsibility. Other controllers, responsible for the safety of aircraft flying between airfields, may be located in Air Traffic Control Centres (ATCCs) or Air Traffic Control Radar Units (ATCRUs) neither of which need be situated on airfields. The Control Tower Recognise a Control 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Helicopters , R
    The evolution of helicopters , R. Chen, C. Y. Wen, S. Lorente, and A. Bejan Citation: J. Appl. Phys. 120, 014901 (2016); doi: 10.1063/1.4954976 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4954976 View Table of Contents: http://aip.scitation.org/toc/jap/120/1 Published by the American Institute of Physics JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 120, 014901 (2016) The evolution of helicopters R. Chen,1 C. Y. Wen,1 S. Lorente,2 and A. Bejan3,a) 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong 2Universite de Toulouse, INSA, 135 Avenue de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, France 3Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0300, USA (Received 12 April 2016; accepted 17 June 2016; published online 1 July 2016) Here, we show that during their half-century history, helicopters have been evolving into geo- metrically similar architectures with surprisingly sharp correlations between dimensions, perform- ance, and body size. For example, proportionalities emerge between body size, engine size, and the fuel load. Furthermore, the engine efficiency increases with the engine size, and the propeller radius is roughly the same as the length scale of the whole body. These trends are in accord with the con- structal law, which accounts for the engine efficiency trend and the proportionality between “motor” size and body size in animals and vehicles. These body-size effects are qualitatively the same as those uncovered earlier for the evolution of aircraft. The present study adds to this theoreti- cal body of research the evolutionary design of all technologies [A.
    [Show full text]
  • The A-B Helicopters A/W 95 Is a Tiny Single-Seat Open-Framework Helicopter Designed for Home-Building, Based on the Adams-Wilson Hobbycopter of the 1950S
    The A-B Helicopters A/W 95 is a tiny single-seat open-framework helicopter designed for home-building, based on the Adams-Wilson Hobbycopter of the 1950s. Specifications (A/W 95, typical) General Characteristics Crew: one pilot Length: 15 ft 0 in (4.57 m) Main rotor diameter: 19 ft 6 in (5.94 m) Height: 6 ft 5 in (1.96 m) Main rotor area: 299 ft² (28 m²) Empty: 272 lb (123 kg) Loaded: 490 lb (222 kg) Maximum takeoff: lb ( kg) Powerplant: various - Rotax 583 or similar Performance Maximum speed: 85 mph (136 km/h) Range: miles ( km) Service ceiling: ft ( m) Rate of climb: ft/min ( m/min) Main rotor loading: 1.6 lb/ft² (8 kg/m²) Power/Mass: varies AEG (Allgemeine Elektrizitäts-Gesellschaft) (English Translation: General Electricity Company) is a German producer of electronics and electrical equipment. AEG was founded in 1883 by Emil Rathenau who had bought some patents from Thomas Edison. AEG manufactured a range of aircraft from 1910 to 1918. During WWII AEG engineers played a significant role in developing the magnetic audio tape recorder. In 1967 AEG joined with Telefunken and in 1969 they started working with Siemens AG. In 1985 AEG was bought by Daimler-Benz. The Household Appliances business was sold to Electrolux in 1996. The Transportation business was reorganized into Adtranz which was sold to Bombardier later. Models AEG B.I AEG B.II AEG B.III AEG C.I AEG C.II AEG C.III AEG C.IV AEG C.V AEG C.VIII AEG D.I AEG DJ.I AEG Dr.I AEG F.1 AEG G.I AEG G.IV AEG J.I AEG J.II AEG R.I AEG helicopter The AEG helicopter was an unusual German aircraft project, intended to create a portable observation post in the form of a tethered helicopter.
    [Show full text]
  • Edición 2018-V12 = Rev. 01
    Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © Parte/Vers: 16/12 Página: 4501 Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal Edición 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 SWO. - Suiza. Son las iniciales de “Schweizerische Werkzeugmaschinenfabrik Oerlikon” (ver Oerlikon). SYLPHE .- Alemania. La constructora fué la Bavarian FlugMotoren AG. “Otro Sylphe” .Este motor tiene una arquitectura diferente del mostrado en el texto principal, aunque es muy simetrico en la zona de potencia (cilindros). El anterior si que es rotativo. -De 377”cu y 35/40 CV. SYMAHS.- Yugoeslavia. En 1932 la Hispano Suiza crea en Yugoeslavia la “Sociedad Yugoeslava de Motores de Aviones Hispano Suiza”. “Sylphe rotativo” -Fabricó y mantuvo los motores utilizados durante ésa década por las fuerzas yugoeslavas para sus aviones IK-2 -Hizo un motor radial rotativo de 5 cilindros, de 377 pulg. y -3. cú. de cilindrada y su potencia era de 35/40 CV a 1200 rpm. -Del Apendice 9: Obtenida otra ilustración de otro motor radial (no parece rotativo) de ésta marca cuya construcción la efectuaba la Bavarian FlugMotoren AG. SZABLOSKY. - Polonia. De J. Szablosky constan dos motores del año 1935, el JS-3 y el JS-4. * * * Radiografi as de los Turbomeca TM319, TM333, MTM385 y RTM322. Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 Este facsímil es < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 ORIGINAL si la Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © página anterior tiene Parte/Vers: 16/12 Página: 4502 el sello con tinta Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal VERDE Edición: 2018-V12 = Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Aircraft Type Ratings Appendix I Part-66
    NCAR Part- 66 Aircraft Maintenance Licence Chapter 4 (Appendices to AMCs) (List of aircraft type ratings for Appendix I to AMC to Part‐66) Appendix I Aircraft Type Ratings for NCAR Part-66 Aircraft Maintenance Licence The following aircraft type ratings should be used by CAA Nepal. The type rating will be endorsed in the NCAR Part-66 AML for the aircraft registered in Nepal only. This list is based on EASA Type rating list published by EASA ED Decision 2015/020/R that is regularly updated by EASA and List of Type Certificate Validation/Acceptance by CAA Nepal. The CAA Nepal will visit the EASA website to identify the latest changes and CAA Nepal Type Certificate Validation/Acceptance list to update this list. Notes on when the licences should be modified: When a modification is introduced by this Decision to an aircraft type rating or to an engine designation in the rating which affect licences already issued, the ratings on the Aircraft Maintenance Licences (AMLs) may be modified at the next renewal or when the licence is reissued, unless there is an urgent reason to modify the licence. Notes on aircraft modified by Supplemental Type Certificate (STC): − This Appendix I intends to include the type ratings of aircraft resulting from STCs for installation of another engine. These STCs are those approved by the CAA Nepal. Other STCs than those for engines are not considered. − However, the ratings from STCs for installation of an engine: − on part of the original airframe models, or − from the same manufacturer, but of a type very similar to the original one, have not been added because they would have resulted in an already existing rating.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Aeroengine Industry • a CASI Monograph 1 CASI Supports the U.S
    China’s Aeroengine Industry Prepared by TextOre, Inc. Peter Wood, Alden Wahlstrom, Roger Cliff March 2020 Printed in the United States of America by the China Aerospace Studies Institute ISBN: 9798637786664 To request additional copies, please direct inquiries to Director, China Aerospace Studies Institute, Air University, 55 Lemay Plaza, Montgomery, AL 36112 Design by Heisey-Grove Design Photos licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.airuniversity.af.mil/CASI Twitter: https://twitter.com/CASI_Research | @CASI_Research Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CASI.Research.Org LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/11049011 Disclaimer The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, Intellectual Property, Patents, Patent Related Matters, Trademarks and Copyrights; this work is the property of the U.S. Government. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights Reproduction and printing is subject to the Copyright Act of 1976 and applicable treaties of the United States. This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This publication is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal, academic, or governmental use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete; however, it is requested that reproductions credit the author and China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI). Permission is required from the China Aerospace Studies Institute to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use.
    [Show full text]
  • Tei Post 136
    ISSUE1362019 Periodical Publication of TUSAS Engine Industries, Inc. FIRST NATIONAL T700-TEI-701D ENGINE OF TURKEY DELIVERED TO TURKISH AEROSPACE GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONY HELD FOR TURBOSHAFT R&D TEST CENTER PROCUREMENT AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING MACHINES EXECUTED FROM Dear TEI Post Readers, We are happy to meet you again in the 136th issue of the TEI THE EDITOR Post. “Cover Story” of this issue features the delivery ceremony of the first 4 national T700-TEI-701D model turboshaft engines, produced as part of the Turkish Utility Helicopter Program delivered to Turkish Aerospace on May 13, and the T700 Engine Production Test Cell opened by Mr. Mustafa Varank, the Minister of Industry and Technology. Under the sections “Activities & Projects” and “News About TEI”, we have tried to share the latest developments about our company. “Achievement Board” section emphasizes the highly prestigious awards granted to our company such as Employee Engagement and Most Female Friendly Company. You can read the stories of Pergamon, the city of the firsts, under the section “Travel”. See you in our 137th issue... IMPRINT For and on Behalf of TEI Head Office Address Prof. Mahmut F. Aksit TUSAS Engine Industries, Inc. Esentepe Mah. Cevreyolu Bulvari Executive Editor No: 356 26210 Yeliz Cetinkaya Tepebasi / Eskisehir-Turkey Executive Editorial Tel: +90 (222) 211 21 00 Consultant Fax: +90 (222) 211 21 01 Mahmut Serhan Sokmen www.tei.com.tr Managing Editor Publisher Senay Dortkasli Dumat Ofset Matbaacilik Bahcekapi Mah. 2477 Sok. No: 6 Editorial Board Sasmaz / Ankara Ezgi Cetin Dincer Tel: +90 (312) 278 82 00 Denizgun Dag Demir Erkan Balk Publication Type Regional Periodical Editor Nezir Onal Printing Date 30.07.2019 Digital Art Director Derya Polat Printing Period February-July Production All rights are reserved on behalf of TUSAS Engine Industries, Inc.
    [Show full text]