DOCSLIB.ORG

Mammalia: Proboscidea: Gomphotheriidae) Driven by Dietary Resource Competition with Sympatric Mammoths and Mastodons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mammalia: Proboscidea: Gomphotheriidae) Driven by Dietary Resource Competition with Sympatric Mammoths and Mastodons Paleobiology, 46(1), 2020, pp. 41–57 DOI: 10.1017/pab.2020.7 Article Extinction of North American Cuvieronius (Mammalia: Proboscidea: Gomphotheriidae) driven by dietary resource competition with sympatric mammoths and mastodons Gregory James Smith and Larisa R. G. DeSantis Abstract.—The gomphotheres were a diverse and widespread group of proboscideans occupying Eurasia, North America, and South America throughout the Neogene. Their decline was temporally and spatially heterogeneous, and the gomphotheres ultimately became extinct during the late Pleistocene; however, the genus Cuvieronius is rarely represented in late Pleistocene assemblages in North America. Two alternative hypotheses have been invoked to explain this phenomenon: (1) competitive exclusion by sympatric mam- moths and mastodons or (2) ecologic displacement due to an environmental transition from closed forests to open grasslands. To test whether competition for resources contributed to the demise of North Ameri- can Cuvieronius, we present herein a large collection of stable isotope and dental microwear data from populations occupying their Pleistocene refugium in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Results suggest that Cuvieronius consumed a wide range of resources with variable textural and photosynthetic properties and was not specialized on either grasses or browse. Further, we document evidence for the consumption of similar foods between contemporaneous gomphotheres, mammoths, and mastodons. The generalist feeding strategy of the gomphotheres likely facilitated their high Miocene abundance and diversity. How- ever, this “jack of all trades and master of none” feeding strategy may have proved challenging following the arrival of mammoths and likely contributed to the extirpation of Cuvieronius in North America. Gregory James Smith. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Larisa R. G. DeSantis. Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, U.S.A.; and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted: 4 January 2020 Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6djh9w0x1 Introduction (ca. 0.3–0.012 Ma sensu Bell et al. 2004) (Car- Gomphotheres (subfamily Gomphotheriinae rasco et al. 2005). The success of the mammoth sensu lato) are temporally and spatially prolific; radiation and its temporal correlation with the the clade became dominant in North America demise of the gomphotheres in North America in the Miocene and emigrated to South Amer- has led some to argue that competition from ica from North America after the closure of early mammoths caused the extirpation of the the Isthmus of Panama between 2.5 and 0.125 gomphotheres (i.e., competitive exclusion; Ma (Webb 1985; Reguero et al. 2007; Wood- Kurtén and Anderson 1980). However, others burne 2010; Mothé et al. 2017). Their dietary have argued that cooling climates and the flexibility is hypothesized to have facilitated emergence of steppe/prairie habitats would their successful migration in contrast to mam- have displaced the gomphotheres from North moths and mastodons, which remained in Cen- America even in the absence of competition tral and North America despite the continental (i.e., ecological displacement; Dudley 1996). connection (Pérez-Crespo et al. 2016). On the These two competing hypotheses have yet to other hand, gomphothere abundance, diver- be fully tested or resolved. sity, and geographic range in North America The competitive exclusion principle attests rapidly drops off after the arrival of mam- that when closely related species with similar moths, and the gomphotheres are rarely repre- niches coexist, one of these taxa will either out- sented in Rancholabrean faunal assemblages compete the other or they will partition their © 2020 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the DownloadedCreative from https://www.cambridge.org/core Commons Attribution licence. IP address: (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), 170.106.40.139, on 26 Sep 2021 at 22:06:40, subject to the Cambridge which permits Core terms unrestricted of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/termsre-use, distribution, and reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2020.7 in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 0094-8373/20 42 GREGORY JAMES SMITH AND LARISA R. G. DESANTIS niches to exploit different resources (Hardin (Hulbert 2001). Mastodons, represented by the 1960). Niche partitioning studies in fossil ungu- genus Zygolophodon, and gomphotheres, lates are commonly carried out through a including the genus Gomphotherium,have reconstruction of diet using methods similar been recovered from Miocene sites in both Flor- to those implemented here and often show ida and Texas (Lambert and Shoshani 1998). the alteration of dietary preference by one or Later representatives of these clades, including multiple organisms to facilitate coexistence the mastodon Mammut and the gomphothere with other organisms (e.g., in bovids, camelids, Rhynchotherium, are found extensively in the and horses; MacFadden et al. 1999; Bibi 2007; southern latitudes of North America and Cen- DeSantis et al. 2009; Yann and DeSantis 2014). tral America beginning in the early Pliocene Similarly, studies of proboscidean dietary (Lambert and Shoshani 1998; Lucas and Alvar- niche partitioning often indicate high dietary ado 2010; Pasenko 2012). Cuvieronius—the only flexibility among focal taxa (e.g., Calandra gomphothere genus found in North America, et al. 2008; Rivals et al. 2015; Pérez-Crespo South America, and Central America—appears et al. 2016). Most paleoecological studies on in Florida by ca. 2 Ma (Arroyo-Cabrales et al. gomphotheres suggest that they were already 2007; Lucas 2008; Lucas and Alvarado 2010). highly flexible in their dietary choices, capable The mammoth specimens recovered from the of fluctuating between grazing, browsing, and ACP are coeval with some of the earliest Mam- mixed-feeding habits (e.g., MacFadden and muthus records in North America from the Rio Cerling 1996; Koch et al. 1998, 2004; MacFad- Grande valley of southern New Mexico (Lucas den 2000; Fox and Fisher 2001, 2004; Sánchez et al. 2017). Cuvieronius is known in Florida et al. 2004; Calandra et al. 2008; DeSantis et al. until ca. 0.5 Ma (Lucas 2008); however, some 2009; Rivals et al. 2015; Pérez-Crespo et al. of the youngest Cuvieronius records known in 2016; Zhang et al. 2017; González-Guarda North America come from the Big Cypress et al. 2018). However, on a smaller spatial and Creek site of east Texas (Lundelius et al. 2013, temporal scale, gomphotheres tended to restrict 2019). Mammuthus and Mammut are last their dietary preferences due to abiotic (cli- known from North America in late Pleistocene matic) or biotic (competitive) factors; for sites between 14 and 10 ka (Bell et al. 2004; Bar- example, South American populations of Notio- nosky et al. 2014). Thus, the samples used in mastodon showed an adaptive trend toward this study include some of the earliest and latest either grazing or browsing habits in the late examples of these proboscidean taxa in the Pleistocene due to habitat differentiation (Sán- ACP. chez et al. 2004; Mothé and Avilla 2015), This study aims to fill an important spatial South China populations of Sinomastodon and temporal gap in the paleoecological record were restricted to the consumption of browse of proboscideans. In this paper, we present a due to competition with co-occurring Stegodon quantitative analysis of dietary differences (Zhang et al. 2017), and the East Asian gom- among Pleistocene proboscideans in North photherid Protanancus was competitively dis- America using the integration of stable isotope placed by the amebelodont Platybelodon geochemistry and dental microwear texture (Wang et al. 2015). Recognizing this pattern of analysis (DMTA). The design of this study dietary restriction in smaller populations, we allows for both a regional comparison over therefore limit our analysis herein to Pleisto- time (from the early to late Pleistocene) and cene populations of gomphothere (Cuvieronius local, site-based assessments. Specifically, mul- hyodon), mammoth (Mammuthus columbi), and tiproxy data are used to test the following mastodon (Mammut americanum) occupying hypotheses: (1) North American Cuvieronius the Atlantic Coastal Plain (ACP) physiogeo- consumed similar resources as sympatric Mam- graphic province of North America (Fig. 1A). muthus and/or Mammut; and (2) Cuvieronius, While both the mastodon and the gom- Mammuthus, and Mammut altered their dietary phothere families were present in the ACP habits in the ACP throughout the Pleistocene. since the middle Miocene, the earliest mam- Evidence for the consumption of similar moths did not arrive until the early Pleistocene resources by Cuvieronius and Mammuthus or Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.139, on 26 Sep 2021 at 22:06:40, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/pab.2020.7 DIETARY RESOURCE COMPETITION IN PROBOSCIDEANS 43 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.139, on 26 Sep 2021 at 22:06:40, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1.1 První Chobotnatci 5 1.2 Plesielephantiformes 5 1.3 Elephantiformes 6 1.3.1 Mammutida 6 1.3.2 Elephantida 7 1.3.3 Elephantoidea 7 2
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV GEOLOGICKÝCH VĚD Jakub Březina Rešerše k bakalářské práci Využití mikrostruktur klů neogenních chobotnatců na příkladu rodu Zygolophodon Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. Martin Ivanov, Dr. Brno 2012 OBSAH 1. Současný pohled na evoluci chobotnatců 3 1.1 První chobotnatci 5 1.2 Plesielephantiformes 5 1.3 Elephantiformes 6 1.3.1 Mammutida 6 1.3.2 Elephantida 7 1.3.3 Elephantoidea 7 2. Kly chobotnatců a jejich mikrostruktura 9 2.1 Přírůstky v klech chobotnatců 11 2.1.1 Využití přírůstků v klech chobotnatců 11 2.2 Schregerův vzor 12 2.2.1 Stavba Schregerova vzoru 12 2.2.2 Využití Schregerova vzoru 12 2.3 Dentinové kanálky 15 3 Sedimenty s nálezy savců v okolí Mikulova 16 3.1 Baden 17 3.2 Pannon a Pont 18 1. Současný pohled na evoluci chobotnatců Současná systematika chobotnatců není kompletně odvozena od jejich fylogeneze, rekonstruované pomocí kladistických metod. Diskutované skupiny tak mnohdy nepředstavují monofyletické skupiny. Přestože jsou taxonomické kategorie matoucí (např. Laurin 2005), jsem do jisté míry nucen je používat. Některým skupinám úrovně stále přiřazeny nebyly a zde této skutečnosti není přisuzován žádný význam. V této rešerši jsem se zaměřil hlavně na poznatky, které následovaly po vydání knihy; The Proboscidea: Evolution and Paleoecology of Elephants and Their Relatives, od Shoshaniho a Tassyho (1996). Chobotnatci jsou součástí skupiny Tethytheria společně s anthracobunidy, sirénami a desmostylidy (Shoshani 1998; Shoshani & Tassy 1996; 2005; Gheerbrant & Tassy 2009). Základní klasifikace sestává ze dvou skupin. Ze skupiny Plesielephantiformes, do které patří čeledě Numidotheriidae, Barytheriidae a Deinotheridae a ze skupiny Elephantiformes, do které patří čeledě Palaeomastodontidae, Phiomiidae, Mammutida, Gomphotheriidae, tetralofodontní gomfotéria, Stegodontidae a Elephantidae (Shoshani & Marchant 2001; Shoshani & Tassy 2005; Gheerbrant & Tassy 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Guide: Meet the Proboscideans
    Teacher Guide: Meet the Proboscideans Concepts: • Living and extinct animals can be classified by their physical traits into families and species. • We can often infer what animals eat by the size and shape of their teeth. Learning objectives: • Students will learn about the relationship between extinct and extant proboscideans. • Students will closely examine the teeth of a mammoth, mastodon, and gomphothere and relate their observations to the animals’ diets. They will also contrast a human’s jaw and teeth to a mammoth’s. This is an excellent example of the principle of “form fits function” that occurs throughout biology. TEKS: Grade 5 § 112.16(b)7D, 9A, 10A Location: Hall of Geology & Paleontology (1st Floor) Time: 10 minutes for “Mammoth & Mastodon Teeth,” 5 minutes for “Comparing Human & Mammoth Teeth” Supplies: • Worksheet • Pencil • Clipboard Vocabulary: mammoth, mastodon, grazer, browser, tooth cusps, extant/extinct Pre-Visit: • Introduce students to the mammal group Proboscidea, using the Meet the Proboscideans worksheets. • Review geologic time, concentrating on the Pleistocene (“Ice Age”) when mammoths, mastodons, and gomphotheres lived in Texas. • Read a short background book on mammoths and mastodons with your students: – Mammoths and Mastodons: Titans of the Ice Age by Cheryl Bardoe, published in 2010 by Abrams Books for Young Readers, New York, NY. Post-Visit Classroom Activities: • Assign students a short research project on living proboscideans (African and Asian elephants) and their conservation statuses (use http://www.iucnredlist.org/). Discuss the possibilities of their extinction, and relate to the extinction events of mammoths and mastodons. Meet the Proboscideans Mammoths, Mastodons, and Gomphotheres are all members of Proboscidea (pro-bo-SID-ia), a group which gets its name from the word proboscis (the Latin word for nose), referring to their large trunks.
    [Show full text]
  • Waco Mammoth Site • Special Resource Study / Environmental Assessment • Texas Waco Mammoth Site Special Resource Study / Environmental Assessment
    Waco Mammoth Site Waco National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Waco Mammoth Site • Special Resource Study / Environmental Assessment • Texas Waco Mammoth Site Special Resource Study Special Resource / Environmental Assessment Environmental National Park Service • United States Department of the Interior Special Resource Study/Environmental Assessment Texas July • 2008 As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national This report has been prepared to provide Congress and the public with information about parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor the resources in the study area and how they relate to criteria for inclusion within the recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure national park system. Publication and transmittal of this report should not be considered an that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship endorsement or a commitment by the National Park Service to seek or support either and citizen participation in their care. The department also has a major responsibility for specific legislative authorization for the project or appropriation for its implementation. American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under Authorization and funding for any new commitments by the National Park Service will have U.S. administration. to be considered in light of competing priorities for existing units of the national park system and other programs.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Diversity of Elephants (Mammalia, Proboscidea) in the Early and Early Middle Pleistocene of France
    New data on the diversity of Elephants (Mammalia, Proboscidea) in the Early and early Middle Pleistocene of France N. Aouadi Laboratory of Prehistory, Aix en Provence, France - [email protected] SUMMARY: The remains of elephants are relatively scarce in Western Europe especially during the Early Pleistocene. The excavations of Ceyssaguet and Soleilhac (Haute-Loire, France) yielded a set of elephant teeth and bones, which belong to Mammuthus and Palaeoloxodon group. The majority of bones from Ceyssaguet (dated at 1.2 Ma.) are those of Mammuthus meridionalis but a very few bone legs belong proba- bly to the Palaeoloxodon group. On the other hand the majority of elephant finds from Soleilhac belong to Palaeoloxodon antiquus. Nevertheless some teeth could be assigned to Mammuthus meridionalis. 1. INTRODUCTION postcranials bones of elephants. The age of the site (by K/A) is estimated at 1.2 Ma. The most 1.1 Review of Pleistocene Elephant species part of fossils provides from legs either found from Western Europe connected or partly dissociated. Our study of those fossils showed the possible presence of Two groups of elephants are known from two elephants species: Mammuthus meridionalis Western Europe: the Mammuthus group and in level 2 (the majority of bones) and probably Palaeoloxodon group. The first one contains Palaeoloxodon antiquus in level 3. three subgroups: Mammuthus meridionalis The humerus from level 2 are flattened (with three subspecies: Mammuthus meridion- transversely and present a triangular section, alis gromovi, Mammuthus meridionalis merid- which characterised those of Mammuthus. On ionalis and Mammuthus meridionalis vestinus); the fourth carpal bone the higher facet for Mammuthus trogontherii (which appears at pyramidal and the lower one for metacarpal the beginning of Galerian) and the later is bone V touched together along the external Mammuthus primigenius (Palombo 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Mammoths and Mastodons
    AMERI AN MU E.UM OF ATU R I HI 1 R Mammoths and Mastodons By W. D. MATTHEW . THE. AMERICAN MASTODON Model by Charles R. Knight, based upon The Warren Mastodon skeleton in the American Museum of Natural History No. 43 Of THE GUIDE LEAFLET SERIES.-NOVE.MBER, 1915. Aft, O.~born THE WARREN MASTODON SKELETON IN THE AMERICAN MUSEUM . Mammoths and Mastodons A guide to th collections of fossil proboscideans in the Ameri an Museum of Natural History By W. D. MATTHEW 0 TE.i. T Pag 1. L ~TROD T RY. Di tribulion. Early Di coYerie . .............. ~. THE ExTL -cT ELEPHA_~T . The tru mammoth-~ la kan mamm th - k 1 t n from Indiana- ize of the mammoth-th Columbian 1 - phant- th Imperial lephant-extin t 011 World elephant - Plio n and Plei tocene elephant ' of Inclia-e,·olution f lephant from n1a to don ......................... .. ............... .. ..... ... 3. THE ... :\IERICAX :MA TODOX. Teeth f the ma tod n-habit an 1 en­ Yironment-the w·arren ma t don-male and femal kull -di tribu- tion of the ... merican ma todon . 1 z ..J.. THE LATER TERTB.RY 11A TODOX . The two-tu ked mat don Dibelodon-the long-jawed ma. t don Tetralophodon-the b aked ma todon Rhyncotherium-the primitiYe four tu k d ma tod n . Trilophod n-the Dinotherium.. 1.5 THE EARLY TERTL\.RY AxcE TOR OF THE 11A TODOX . Palreoma tod n - M reritherium-character. and affinitie . I 6. THE E'.'OL TIOX OF THE PRoBo CIDEA. D ubtful po ition of :i\I rither­ ium-Palreoma todon a primiti, prob cidean-Dinoth rium an aberrant ide-branch-Tril phodon de.:,cended from Palreoma todon­ branching into everal phYla in ~Ii cene and Plioc ne- Dib lodon phylum in ~ ~ orth and outh America-~Ia tod n phylum-elephant phylum-origin and di per al of th probo cidea and th ir proo·re ,i,·e exti11ctio11 .
    [Show full text]
  • Title Stegodon Miensis Matsumoto (Proboscidea) from the Pliocene Yaoroshi Formation, Akiruno City, Tokyo, Japan( Fulltext ) Auth
    Stegodon miensis Matsumoto (Proboscidea) from the Pliocene Title Yaoroshi Formation, Akiruno City, Tokyo, Japan( fulltext ) Author(s) AIBA, Hiroaki; BABA, Katsuyoshi; MATSUKAWA, Masaki Citation 東京学芸大学紀要. 自然科学系, 58: 203-206 Issue Date 2006-09-00 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2309/63450 Committee of Publication of Bulletin of Tokyo Gakugei Publisher University Rights Bulletin of Tokyo Gakugei University, Natural Sciences, 58, pp．203 ～ 206 , 2006 Stegodon miensis Matsumoto (Proboscidea) from the Pliocene Yaoroshi Formation, Akiruno City, Tokyo, Japan Hiroaki AIBA ＊, Katsuyoshi BABA ＊, Masaki MATSUKAWA ＊＊ Environmental Sciences （Received for Publication ; May 26, 2006） AIBA, H., BABA, K. and MATSUKAWA, M.: Stegodon miensis Matsumoto (Proboscidea) from the Pliocene Yaoroshi Formation, Akiruno City, Tokyo, Japan. Bull. Tokyo Gakugei Univ. Natur. Sci., 58: 203 – 206 (2006) ISSN 1880–4330 Abstract The molar of Stegodon from the Pliocene Yaoroshi Formation in Akiruno City, Tokyo, is described as S. miensis Matsumoto, based on morphological characteristics and dimensional characters of the specimen. The present specimen of S. miensis from the Yaoroshi Formation is shown to represent the uppermost-known horizon of the species. Key words : Stegodon miensis, Yaoroshi Formation, Late Pliocene, molar, paleontological description * Keio Gijyuku Yochisha, Shibuya, Tokyo 150-0013, Japan. ** Department of Environmental Sciences, Tokyo Gakugei University, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8501, Japan. Corresponding author : Masaki Matsukawa ([email protected]) Introduction ulna. The materials were initially identified as Stegodon bombifrons (Itsukaichi Stegodon Research Group, 1980) and Stegodon miensis Matsumoto (Proboscidea) is the oldest- subsequently distinguished as S. shinshuensis (Taruno, known species of the genus Stegodon in Japan. The species 1991a). Taru and Kohno (2002) considered S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mastodonts of Brazil': the State of the Art of South American
    Quaternary International 443 (2017) 52e64 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Sixty years after ‘The mastodonts of Brazil’: The state of the art of South American proboscideans (Proboscidea, Gomphotheriidae) * Dimila Mothe a, b, , Leonardo dos Santos Avilla a, c, Lidiane Asevedo a, d, Leon Borges-Silva a, Mariane Rosas e, Rafael Labarca-Encina f, Ricardo Souberlich g, Esteban Soibelzon h, i, Jose Luis Roman-Carrion j, Sergio D. Ríos k, Ascanio D. Rincon l, Gina Cardoso de Oliveira b, Renato Pereira Lopes m a Laboratorio de Mastozoologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Bioci^encias, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Pasteur, 458, 501, Urca, CEP 22290-240, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil b Programa de Pos-graduaç ao~ em Geoci^encias, Centro de Tecnologia e Geoci^encias, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Rua Acad^emico Helio Ramos, s/n, Cidade Universitaria, CEP 50740-467, Recife, Brazil c Programa de Pos-graduaç ao~ em Biodiversidade Neotropical, Instituto de Bioci^encias, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Pasteur, 458, 501, Urca, CEP 22290-240, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil d Faculdade de Geoci^encias (Fageo), Campus Cuiaba, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Correa da Costa, 2367, Jardim Petropolis, CEP 78070-000, Cuiaba, Mato Grosso, Brazil e Laboratorio de Paleontologia, Centro de Ci^encias Agrarias, Ambientais e Biologicas, Universidade Federal do Reconcavo^ da Bahia, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil f Laboratorio de Paleoecología, Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile g Laboratorio de Paleontología, Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Acceso Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Filling a Gap in the Proboscidean Fossil Record: a New Genus from The
    Filling a gap in the proboscidean fossil record: a new genus from the Lutetian of Senegal Rodolphe Tabuce, Raphaël Sarr, Sylvain Adnet, Renaud Lebrun, Fabrice Lihoreau, Jeremy Martin, Bernard Sambou, Mustapha Thiam, Lionel Hautier To cite this version: Rodolphe Tabuce, Raphaël Sarr, Sylvain Adnet, Renaud Lebrun, Fabrice Lihoreau, et al.. Filling a gap in the proboscidean fossil record: a new genus from the Lutetian of Senegal. Journal of Paleontology, Paleontological Society, 2019, pp.1-9. 10.1017/jpa.2019.98. hal-02408861 HAL Id: hal-02408861 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02408861 Submitted on 8 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Filling a gap in the proboscidean fossil record: a new genus from 2 the Lutetian of Senegal 3 4 Rodolphe Tabuce1, Raphaël Sarr2, Sylvain Adnet1, Renaud Lebrun1, Fabrice Lihoreau1, Jeremy 5 E. Martin2, Bernard Sambou3, Mustapha Thiam3, and Lionel Hautier1 6 7 1Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, UMR5554, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Université de 8 Montpellier, Montpellier, France <[email protected]> 9 <[email protected]> <[email protected]> 10 <[email protected]> <[email protected] > 11 2Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • La Brea and Beyond: the Paleontology of Asphalt-Preserved Biotas
    La Brea and Beyond: The Paleontology of Asphalt-Preserved Biotas Edited by John M. Harris Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series 42 September 15, 2015 Cover Illustration: Pit 91 in 1915 An asphaltic bone mass in Pit 91 was discovered and exposed by the Los Angeles County Museum of History, Science and Art in the summer of 1915. The Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History resumed excavation at this site in 1969. Retrieval of the “microfossils” from the asphaltic matrix has yielded a wealth of insect, mollusk, and plant remains, more than doubling the number of species recovered by earlier excavations. Today, the current excavation site is 900 square feet in extent, yielding fossils that range in age from about 15,000 to about 42,000 radiocarbon years. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Archives, RLB 347. LA BREA AND BEYOND: THE PALEONTOLOGY OF ASPHALT-PRESERVED BIOTAS Edited By John M. Harris NO. 42 SCIENCE SERIES NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Luis M. Chiappe, Vice President for Research and Collections John M. Harris, Committee Chairman Joel W. Martin Gregory Pauly Christine Thacker Xiaoming Wang K. Victoria Brown, Managing Editor Go Online to www.nhm.org/scholarlypublications for open access to volumes of Science Series and Contributions in Science. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Los Angeles, California 90007 ISSN 1-891276-27-1 Published on September 15, 2015 Printed at Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas PREFACE Rancho La Brea was a Mexican land grant Basin during the Late Pleistocene—sagebrush located to the west of El Pueblo de Nuestra scrub dotted with groves of oak and juniper with Sen˜ora la Reina de los A´ ngeles del Rı´ode riparian woodland along the major stream courses Porciu´ncula, now better known as downtown and with chaparral vegetation on the surrounding Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Proboscidea (Elephants) Professor Dr
    The Distribution of Proboscidea (Elephants) Professor Dr. Erich Thenius [In: Kosmos #5, May, pp. 235-242, 1964, Stuttgart] When I speak here about animals with a trunk, I do not mean the tapirs or pigs, but I refer only to the elephants and their ancestors, like the Mastodons and Dinotheria which we call the Proboscidea (after the Greek: proboscis = trunk). Their main characteristic is their remarkable trunk which has been fashioned to become a “gripping” organ. That organ was not present in the geologically oldest ancestors whose skeletons stem from the deposits of the Eocene (old Tertiary) in Africa. Even though we have no “soft tissues” of those animals, their skeletal features suffice to tell the scientist just what their bodily characteristics would have been. Thus also, we are not really going to discuss much about their distribution in historic times, but rather, we will concentrate on the development of these characteristic mammals, from their inception to their distribution in the past. A history of the Proboscidea is necessarily a history of their distribution in time and space. Information of these animals is available from numerous fossil findings in nearly all continents. But, before we even consider the fossil history, let us take a quick look of the current distribution of elephants which is shown in Figure 1. Nowadays, there are only two species of elephants: the Indian and African elephants. They not only differ geographically but also morphologically. That is to say, they are different in their bodily form and in their anatomy in several characteristics as every attentive zoo visitor who sees them side-by-side easily observes: The small-eared Indian elephant (Elephas maximus) has a markedly bowed upper skull; the African cousin (Loxodonta africana) has longer legs and markedly larger ears.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator Guide Presented by the Field Museum
    at the San Diego Natural History Museum July 4-November 11, 2013 Educator Guide Presented by The Field Museum INSIDE: Exhibition Introduction • Planning Your Visit Gallery Overviews and Guiding Questions • Focused Field Trip Activities Correlations to California State Content Standards • Additional Resources Mammoths and Mastodons: Titans of the Ice Age at the San Diego Natural History Museum is supported by: City of San Diego Commission for Arts and Culture County of San Diego Board of Supervisors, Community Enhancement Program Walter J. and Betty C. Zable Foundation Qualcomm Foundation The Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation VWR Charitable Foundation Education Sponsor: The Field Museum gratefully acknowledges the collaboration and assistance of the Shemanovskii Regional Museum and Exhibition Complex and the International Mammoth Committee. Walking Map The Field Museum • Mammoths and Mastodons Educator Guide • fieldmuseum.org/mammoths Page 2 www.sdnhm.org/mammoths-mastodons Exhibition Introduction Mammoths and Mastodons: Titans of the Ice Age July 4–November 11, 2013 Millions of years ago, colossal mammals roamed Europe, Asia, and North America. From the gigantic mammoth to the massive mastodon, these creatures have captured the world’s fascination. Meet “Lyuba,” the best-preserved baby mammoth in the world, and discover all that we’ve learned from her. Journey back to the Ice Age through monumental video installations, roam among saber-toothed cats and giant bears, and wonder over some of the oldest human artifacts in existence. Hands-on exciting interactive displays reveal the difference between a mammoth and a mastodon, This sketch shows a Columbian mammoth, an offer what may have caused their extinction, and show African elephant, and an American mastodon how today’s scientists excavate, analyze, and learn more (from back to front).
    [Show full text]
  • Columbian Mammoths: Giants of the Ice Age
    Name: __________________________________________________ Date: ______________ Columbian Mammoths: Giants of the Ice Age Did you know not all mammoths were woolly mammoths? The woolly mammoth was just one of nearly a dozen different species of mammoths. Another species was the Columbian (pronounced “cuh-LUM-be-un”) mammoth. Columbian mammoths lived during the Pleistocene Epoch (“PLY-stuh-SEEN EP-uck”), sometimes called the Ice Age. The Pleistocene Epoch started 2.5 million years ago and ended about 10,000 years ago. Even though people call it the Ice Age, not all the world was covered in ice. Sheets of ice called glaciers (“GLAY-shurs”) covered most of what is now Canada and the northern United States, but the lands that became the southern United States and Mexico were not under ice. Columbian mammoths were grazers, or animals that eat mostly grass. To make sure they had enough to eat, they lived in savannas (“suh-VAN-uhs”). Savannas are warm grasslands with scattered trees, and they were away from the glaciers. This was different from the woolly mammoths, which lived closer to the glaciers in lands called steppes (“STEPS”), cool plains with shrubs, herbs, and a little grass. How big was a Columbian mammoth? Huge! They were about 14 feet tall, or 4.3 meters. They also weighed as much as 10 tons, the same as a school bus. This made them much bigger than woolly mammoths, which were about 10 feet tall (3 meters) and weighed 6 tons. So why were they called Columbian mammoths? Scientists use New Latin to name animals. In New Latin, “Columbia” means “land of Columbus”, or North America.
    [Show full text]