Molecular Cloning of Complementary DNA Encoding the Lignin-Forming Peroxidase from Tobacco: Molecular Analysis and Tissue-Specific Expression L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 84, pp. 7542-7546, November 1987 Botany Molecular cloning of complementary DNA encoding the lignin-forming peroxidase from tobacco: Molecular analysis and tissue-specific expression L. MARK LAGRIMINI*t, WILLIAM BURKHART, MARY MOYER, AND STEVEN ROTHSTEIN Ciba-Geigy Agricultural Biotechnology Unit, P.O. Box 12257, Research Triangle Park, NC 27705 Communicated by Mary-Dell Chilton, June 29, 1987 ABSTRACT Plant peroxidases play a major role in lignin The moderately anionic peroxidase isozymes (pI, 4.5-6.5) formation and wound healing and are believed to be involved from tobacco are highly expressed in wounded stem tissue in auxin catabolism and defense to pathogen attack. The (6). These isozymes have previously been localized to the cell function of the anionic peroxidase isozymes is best understood walls, and they have a moderate activity toward lignin in tobacco. These isozymes catalyze the formation of the lignin precursors. They may serve a function in wound healing or polymer and form rigid cross-links between lignin, cellulose, suberization by forming a water-tight barrier over the wound and extensin in the secondary plant cell wall. We report the (3). purification of the anionic peroxidase isozymes from tobacco The function of the anionic peroxidase isozymes (pI, and their partial amino acid sequence. An oligonucleotide 3.5-4.0) is understood best. This isozyme group is also cell probe deduced from the amino acid sequence was used to wall associated and has a high activity for the polymerization screen a tobacco leafcDNA library and a 1200-base-pair cDNA of cinnamyl alcohols in vitro (11). They function in lignifica- clone was isolated and sequenced in its entirety. The predicted tion and the cross-linking ofextensin monomers and feruloyl- amino acid sequence revealed a 22-amino acid signal peptide ated polysaccharides (12). Since the formation of the sec- and a 302-amino acid mature protein (Mr, 32,311). The amino ondary cell wall prohibits cell expansion, the activity and acid sequence was compared to that of the cationic peroxidases perhaps the de novo synthesis of the anionic isozymes are from horseradish and turnip and was found to be 52% and 46% likely regulated by auxin levels (13). homologous, respectively. By RNA blot analysis, the messenger We have begun to apply the tools of molecular biology to for the tobacco isozyme was found to be abundant in stem tissue better understand how peroxidases function in growth and while expressed at very low levels in leaf and root tissue. Four development and what role they may play in the plant's distinguishable copies of the gene were found on genomic DNA ability to recover from environmental stress, wounding, and blots. The gene copy number may reflect the allotetraploid infection. Our approach entails the isolation of molecular nature of Nicotiana tabacum. probes to monitor the expression of the various peroxidase isozymes. In this paper, we report the cloning and sequence The peroxidases (donor: hydrogen-peroxide oxidoreductase, of a cDNA encoding one ofthe two anionic peroxidases from EC 1.11.1.7) have been studied extensively in a wide variety A ofhigher plants [for a review, see Gaspar et al. (1)]. They play tobacco. cDNA probe was used to observe the levels of an integral role in secondary cell wall biosynthesis by the expression of the anionic peroxidase genes in several plant polymerization of cinnamyl alcohols into lignin (2) and by tissues. The tobacco genome was also probed to determine forming rigid cross-links between cellulose, pectin, hydroxy- the gene copy number and to characterize the nucleotide proline-rich glycoproteins, and lignin (2). Peroxidases are homology between peroxidase isozyme classes. In addition, also critical in wound healing, in which they in part form a the predicted amino acid sequence of the anionic peroxidase water-tight barrier over the wound by the deposition of of tobacco was compared to that of other plant peroxidases.$ polymeric aliphatic and aromatic compounds (3). Peroxi- dases may also have a role in auxin catabolism (4) and defense MATERIALS AND METHODS of the plant against pathogen attack (5, 6). Most higher plants possess a number of different peroxi- Plant Materials and Growth Conditions. Nicotiana tabac- dase isozymes whose pattern of expression is tissue specific, um (Coker 176), Nicotiana sylvestris, and Nicotiana tomen- developmentally regulated, and influenced by environmental tosiformis plants were grown from seed in the greenhouse factors (6). In the tobacco plant there are at least 12 with 14-hr daily light periods. distinguishable isozymes, which fall into three subgroups; the Anionic Peroxidase Purification and Protein Sequencing. anionic, the moderately anionic, and the cationic. Each group The anionic peroxidase isozymes were purified from tobacco is thought to serve a different function in the cell. leaves as described by Mader (14). Trypsin or cyanogen The cationic peroxidase isozymes (pI, 8.1-11) efficiently bromide cleavage was carried out using standard procedures catalyze the synthesis ofH202 from NADH and H20 (7), and (15). Peptides were isolated by reverse-phase HPLC, and the have recently been localized to the central vacuole (8). These isolated peptides were sequenced on an Applied Biosystems isozymes have also been shown to possess an indoleacetic (Foster City, CA) model 470A gas-phase protein sequencer. acid oxidase activity in the absence of H202 (9). There has NH2-terminal sequence analysis was obtained by first de- been speculation that these isozymes regulate auxin levels, blocking with pyroglutamate amino peptidase (15). form ethylene from 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (10), and provide H202 for other peroxidase isozymes (7). *To whom reprint requests should be addressed. Their actual function in the plant is as yet unclear. tPresent address: Department of Horticulture, Ohio State Univer- sity, Columbus, OH 43210. MThe sequence reported in this paper is being deposited in the The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge EMBL/GenBank data base (Bolt, Beranek, and Newman Labora- payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" tories, Cambridge, MA, and Eur. Mol. Biol. Lab., Heidelberg) in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. (accession no. J02979). 7542 Botany: Lagrimini et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84 (1987) 7543 RNA Isolation and cDNA Library Construction. Poly(A)+ A. NH2-terminus QLSATFYDTTCPNVTSIVRGVMD RNA was isolated from either fresh leaf, root, or stem tissue B. Tryptic 1) GVMDQR (16). Leaf tissue (10 g) or pith tissue (50 g) was homogenized Peptides 2) GMDLTDVALSGAHTFG with a Brinkmann Polytron in equal volumes of grinding 3) LGNISPLTGTNGQ buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0/4% sodium p-aminosalicylic acid/1% sodium naphthalene-1,5-disulfonic acid) and water- CNBr 1) MIKLGNISPLTG saturated phenol. After separating the phases by centrifuga- Peptides 2) MIPQFTNKG tion, the aqueous phase was extracted again with phenol/ CHCl3, and then with CHCl3 alone. The aqueous phase was C. Met Ile Pro Gln Phe Thr Asn Lyg Gly then made 0.5 M LiCl/1 mM EDTA/0.1% Na2DodSO4. Up mRNA AUG AUA CCA CAA UUU ACA AAC AAA GGA-3' to 0.5 g of oligo(dT) cellulose was added and shaken for 10 U G G C G U G G min. The slurry was poured into a small glass column and C C C C poly(A)+ RNA was collected (17). Double-stranded cDNA U U U copies were made from leaf RNA as described poly(A)+ by 26 mer TAC TAT GGI GTT AAA TGI TTG TTT CC -5' Lapeyre and Amalric (18), ligated into Xgtll arms, and probe A C G A C packaged in vitro into phage particles (Vector, Burlingame, G CA). Oligonucleotide Screening. Mixed oligonucleotide probes FIG. 1. Protein sequence data and the synthetic oligonucleotide incorporating deoxyinosines were 5' 32P-end-labeled to a probe used in the cDNA cloning. (A) The NH2-terminal sequence of specific activity of 1 x 106 cpm/pmol with [-32P]ATP (>5000 the anionic tobacco peroxidase after deblocking with pyroglutanlate Ci/mmol; 1 Ci = 37 GBq; New England Nuclear) and T4 amino peptidase. (B) Tryptic and CNBr peptide sequences. (C) Partial amino acid sequence of CNBrpeptide fragment 2, followed by polynucleotide kinase (17). This was used to probe nitrocel- the deduced mRNA sequence, and the synthetic oligonucleotide lulose filter replicas ofthe tobacco leaf cDNA library (19, 20). sequence from the noncoding strand used as the probe. Amino acids Subcloning and DNA Sequencing. Restriction fragments are identified by the single-letter code. were isolated from the cDNA insert and were also subcloned into the appropriately digested vector for DNA sequencing. DNA sequencing was carried out by the dideoxy-chain the proteins with pyroglutamate amino peptidase (15), which termination method on alkali-denatured plasmid templates removes pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, the NH2-terminal se- (21, 22). quence was determined (Fig. 1). It should be noted that even DNA and RNA Filter Hybridizations. High molecular though NH2-terminal sequencing was carried out on an weight DNA was isolated from tobacco leaves as described equivalent mixture of two anionic peroxidases, they revealed by Bendich et al. (23). DNA (5 ,&g) was cleaved with various a unique sequence. This is most likely due to the similarity of restriction enzymes and subjected to agarose gel electropho- the two isozymes, although one cannot eliminate the possi- resis. The DNA was then transferred to nitrocellulose (24) bility that only one polypeptide was deblocked. and hybridized with nick-translated cDNA clones (25). The amino acid sequence of CNBr peptide 2 was used to Poly(A)+ RNA (1 ptg) from leaf, root, and stem tissue was deduce the corresponding nucleotide sequence. A DNA subjected to formaldehyde-agarose gel electrophoresis (26), probe consisting of a mixture of 48 oligonucleotides each 26 and transferred to nitrocellulose filters (27).
Recommended publications
  • Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals

    Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals

    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2006 Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals The Humane Society of the United States Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, and the Other Genetics and Genomics Commons Recommended Citation The Humane Society of the United States, "Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals" (2006). IMPACTS ON FARM ANIMALS. 21. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals/21 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Farm Animal Welfare • The HSUS 2100 L St., N.W. • Washington, DC 20037 • HSUS.org 202-452-1100 • F: 301-258-3081 • FarmAnimalWelfare.org An HSUS Report: Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals Abstract Developments in biotechnology have raised new concerns about animal welfare, as farm animals now have their genomes modified (genetically engineered) or copied (cloned) to propagate certain traits useful to agribusiness, such as meat yield or feed conversion. These animals suffer from unusually high rates of birth defects, disabili- ties, and premature death. Genetically engineering farm animals for greater bone strength or reduced pain reception, for example, may result in improved well-being, yet the broad use of this technology often causes increased suffering. The limited success of gene insertion techniques can result in genes failing to reach target cells and finishing in cells of unintended organs, and abnormally developed embryos may die in utero, be infertile, or born with development defects, attributable in part to insertional problems.
  • Cloning: Adult Vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed

    Cloning: Adult Vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work Spring 5-2001 Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed Rebecca Ruth Frazor University of Tennessee-Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Frazor, Rebecca Ruth, "Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed" (2001). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/459 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: Getec eCA f?- f(CAZOr College: AQn eMi:hA rv Department: A1 (met I SCi!A1w -J Faculty Mentor: F. N-S ChV\C ¥: PROJECT TITLE: C10l/1\(}q : Adult \[) ' fmmrVVl l0 C l, (( ~ ~rd the. ~ Qr\L\A<; Icchn \ quc ~ Emplo\( f d I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commens rate with rs level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ;. ./-1 Faculty Mentor Date: _-+-'""-+----L-___ Comments (Optional): Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Various Techniques Employed Rebecca R. Frazor Mentor: F. Neal Schrick Senior Honors Project May 2001 Abstract The cloning of amphibians and mainly mammals is discussed focusing on somatic cell usage. Significant progress has been made in recent years and this is outlined with an emphasis on techniques and their differences.
  • Direct Cloning and Refactoring of a Silent Lipopeptide Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Yields the Antibiotic Taromycin A

    Direct Cloning and Refactoring of a Silent Lipopeptide Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Yields the Antibiotic Taromycin A

    Direct cloning and refactoring of a silent lipopeptide biosynthetic gene cluster yields the antibiotic taromycin A Kazuya Yamanakaa,b, Kirk A. Reynoldsa,c, Roland D. Kerstena, Katherine S. Ryana,d, David J. Gonzaleze, Victor Nizete,f, Pieter C. Dorresteina,c,f, and Bradley S. Moorea,f,1 aScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; bYokohama Research Center, JNC Corporation, Yokohama 236-8605, Japan; cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; dDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V62 1Z4; and Departments of ePediatrics and fSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 Edited by Jerrold Meinwald, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and approved December 23, 2013 (received for review October 23, 2013) Recent developments in next-generation sequencing technologies genes (9, 10). Synthetic biology approaches also can be used to have brought recognition of microbial genomes as a rich resource refactor orphan gene clusters by optimizing promoters, tran- for novel natural product discovery. However, owing to the scar- scriptional regulation, ribosome-binding sites, and even codon city of efficient procedures to connect genes to molecules, only use (11). Examples of successful regulatory gene manipulation to a small fraction of secondary metabolomes have been investigated elicit the production of new natural products from silent bio- to date. Transformation-associated recombination (TAR) cloning synthetic gene clusters in WT strains have been reported in takes advantage of the natural in vivo homologous recombination bacteria and fungi (12, 13); however, this approach requires the of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to directly capture large genomic loci.
  • Dolly the Sheep – the First Cloned Adult Animal

    Dolly the Sheep – the First Cloned Adult Animal

    DOLLY THE SHEEP – THE FIRST CLONED ADULT ANIMAL NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR IMPROVING LIVESTOCK From Squidonius via Wikimedia Commons In 1996, University of Edinburgh scientists celebrated the birth of Dolly the Sheep, the first mammal to be cloned using SCNT cloning is the only technology adult somatic cells. The Edinburgh team’s success followed available that enables generation of 99.8% its improvements to the single cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) genetically identical offspring from selected technique used in the cloning process. individuals of adult animals (including sterilized animals). As such, it is being Dolly became a scientific icon recognised worldwide and exploited as an efficient multiplication tool SCNT technology has spread around the world and has been to support specific breeding strategies of used to clone multiple farm animals. farm animals with exceptionally high genetic The cloning of livestock enables growing large quantities of value. the most productive, disease resistant animals, thus providing more food and other animal products. Sir Ian Wilmut (Inaugural Director of MRC Centre for Regeneration and Professor at CMVM, UoE) and colleagues worked on methods to create genetically improved livestock by manipulation of stem cells using nuclear transfer. Their research optimised interactions between the donor nucleus and the recipient cytoplasm at the time of fusion and during the first cell cycle. Nuclear donor cells were held in mitosis before being released and used as they were expected to be passing through G1 phase. CLONING IN COMMERCE, CONSERVATION OF AGRICULTURE AND PRESERVATION ANIMAL BREEDS OF LIVESTOCK DIVERSITY Cloning has been used to conserve several animal breeds in the recent past.
  • How They Cloned a Sheep

    How They Cloned a Sheep

    How They Cloned A Sheep How They Cloned A Sheep This text is provided courtesy of the American Museum of Natural History. How they cloned a sheep 1. Scientists took udder cells from Dolly's DNA mother. They let the cells multiply and then they stopped the process when they had divided enough. 2. They took an egg cell from a different sheep and removed the nucleus. 3. They put one udder cell next to the egg cell without a nucleus and joined them using electricity. The egg cell now contained all the udder cell's DNA. 4.The egg cell divided until it developed into an embryo. An embryo is the early stage of an animal before it has been born or hatched. This embryo was placed inside a third sheep. Five months later, this sheep gave birth to Dolly. ReadWorks.org · © 2015 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved. How They Cloned A Sheep - Comprehension Questions Answer Key 1. What did scientists remove from the egg cell of a sheep? A. the nucleus B. the embryo C. DNA D. udder cells 2. This passage describes the sequence of events involved in cloning a sheep. What happened after the scientists took udder cells and an egg cell from different sheep? A. The egg cell was joined to an udder cell using electricity. B. The embryo was placed inside another sheep. C. Scientists took udder cells from Dolly's DNA mother. D. The egg cell divided until it formed an embryo. 3. As part of the process of cloning a sheep, scientists placed the embryo inside a sheep, which eventually gave birth to Dolly.
  • Human Cloning: Fact Or Fiction

    Human Cloning: Fact Or Fiction

    LRN: 05D1721 745. 6239 - i/3 Human Cloning: Fact or Fiction An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor's Degree by Krisha S. Murthy Christopher Tereshko Daniel J. Caloia Amy Borges Date: May 3, 2005 Professor Thomas A. Shannon, Major Advisor 1 Abstract Human Cloning: Fact or Fiction is an evaluation of the portrayal of cloning in the media. Cloning technology has not only made a huge impact in the scientific community, but it has also affected the general community. Cloning is often misrepresented in literature and films, however, giving the public only a partial picture of the different aspects of cloning, such as religion, ethics, and government. Informing them of the facts of cloning technology will form better educated opinions. 2 Section 1 - Introduction In 1997, Dolly was created and cloning became a household word. Before this event, cloning was just a possibility, a fictional thread to weave together tales of science fiction. Once Dolly was born, however, there could be serious talk of cloning and these stories that once seemed like fiction could be considered reality. However, can stories like this really be considered reality? In most fictional books and movies, cloning starts as an amazing scientific breakthrough. However, one or more characters take advantage of the technology and attempt to create, for instance, the perfect army, or a Hitler for the current generation. It could even be as innocent as creating clones to help do a particular tedious task, but even then they get out of hand.
  • Cloning of Gene Coding Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Using Puc18 Vector

    Cloning of Gene Coding Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Using Puc18 Vector

    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2015, 5(3):52-57 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU Cloning of gene coding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase using puc18 vector Manoj Kumar Dooda, Akhilesh Kushwaha *, Aquib Hasan and Manish Kushwaha Institute of Transgene Life Sciences, Lucknow (U.P), India _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The term recombinant DNA technology, DNA cloning, molecular cloning, or gene cloning all refers to the same process. Gene cloning is a set of experimental methods in molecular biology and useful in many areas of research and for biomedical applications. It is the production of exact copies (clones) of a particular gene or DNA sequence using genetic engineering techniques. cDNA is synthesized by using template RNA isolated from blood sample (human). GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) is one of the most commonly used housekeeping genes used in comparisons of gene expression data. Amplify the gene (GAPDH) using primer forward and reverse with the sequence of 5’-TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAA-3’ and 5’-TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTGGGCCAT- 3’.pUC18 high copy cloning vector for replication in E. coli, suitable for “blue-white screening” technique and cleaved with the help of SmaI restriction enzyme. Modern cloning vectors include selectable markers (most frequently antibiotic resistant marker) that allow only cells in which the vector but necessarily the insert has been transfected to grow. Additionally the cloning vectors may contain color selection markers which provide blue/white screening (i.e. alpha complementation) on X- Gal and IPTG containing medium. Keywords: RNA isolation; TRIzol method; Gene cloning; Blue/white screening; Agarose gel electrophoresis.
  • Review on Applications of Genetic Engineering and Cloning in Farm Animals

    Review on Applications of Genetic Engineering and Cloning in Farm Animals

    Journal of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences ISSN: 2573-2196 Review Article Dairy and Vet Sci J Volume 4 Issue 1 - October 2017 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Ayalew Negash DOI: 10.19080/JDVS.2017.04.555629 Review on Applications of Genetic Engineering And Cloning in Farm animals Eyachew Ayana1, Gizachew Fentahun2, Ayalew Negash3*, Fentahun Mitku1, Mebrie Zemene3 and Fikre Zeru4 1Candidate of Veterinary medicine, University of Gondar, Ethiopia 2Candidate of Veterinary medicine, Samara University, Ethiopia 3Lecturer at University of Gondar, University of Gondar, Ethiopia 4Samara University, Ethiopia Submission: July 10, 2017; Published: October 02, 2017 *Corresponding author: Ayalew Negash, Lecturer at University of Gondar, College of Veterinary Medicine and science, University of Gondar, P.O. 196, Gondar, Ethiopia, Email: Abstract Genetic engineering involves producing transgenic animal’s models by using different techniques such as exogenous pronuclear DNA highly applicable and crucial technology which involves increasing animal production and productivity, increases animal disease resistance andmicroinjection biomedical in application. zygotes, injection Cloning ofinvolves genetically the production modified embryonicof animals thatstem are cells genetically into blastocysts identical and to theretrovirus donor nucleus.mediated The gene most transfer. commonly It is applied and recent technique is somatic cell nuclear transfer in which the nucleus from body cell is transferred to an egg cell to create an embryo that is virtually identical to the donor nucleus. There are different applications of cloning which includes: rapid multiplication of desired livestock, and post-natal viabilities. Beside to this Food safety, animal welfare, public and social acceptance and religious institutions are the most common animal conservation and research model.
  • Cloning and Genetic Engineering of Farm Animals

    Cloning and Genetic Engineering of Farm Animals

    INVESTOR BRIEFING NO. 6 SEPTEMBER 2012 Cloning and Genetic Engineering of Farm Animals ABSTRACT Cloning and the genetic modification of farm animals are becoming more common in intensive farming systems in many countries. These procedures can have adverse impacts on the welfare of animals involved and their descendents. Cloning is primarily used to produce identical copies of high yielding and fast growing breeds of animals. The practice is already established in the US, Brazil, Argentina and Japan. Within Europe, however, there has been widespread opposition – on both animal welfare and ethical grounds – to the cloning of animals for food production and to the sale of meat and dairy products from cloned animals and their descendents. The genetic engineering of farm animals is used in China, the US and Australia to enhance growth rates, increase disease resistance and alter meat and milk composition. The European Commission (EC) is currently considering how to regulate the production and use of GM animals. Introduction The cloning of farm animals for food production is already under way in a number of countries including the US, Brazil, Argentina and Japan. In the EU, however, cloning has become a controversial issue, with the European Commission (EC) being firmly opposed to the cloning of animals for food production and to the sale of meat and dairy products from clones and their descendants. Interestingly, the opposition of the EC and animal welfare organisations is based on animal welfare and ethical grounds rather than on food safety concerns. While the science currently indicates that food from clones and their descendants does not raise food safety issues, it may be too early to be confident about this.
  • Genetically Modified Organisms: Activity 1 Page 1 of 3

    Genetically Modified Organisms: Activity 1 Page 1 of 3

    Genetically Modified Organisms: Activity 1 Page 1 of 3 Activity 1: Coming Attractions Based on video content 15 minutes (10 minutes before and 5 minutes after the video) Setup Before watching the video, answer a few quick questions about genetically modified organisms. Don’t think too long about the questions—just write down your first response. You might already know the answers to some of them; otherwise, just take an educated guess. During the video, listen for the topics addressed by the questions. After the video, review the questions and the answers as a group. Materials • Transparency of the Coming Attractions Questions (master copy provided) • Transparency of the Coming Attractions Answers (master copy provided) Rediscovering Biology - 323 - Appendix Genetically Modified Organisms: Activity 1 (Master Copy) Page 2 of 3 Coming Attractions Questions 1. What two U.S. crops are the most heavily genetically modified? 2. What fraction of U.S. corn is genetically engineered? 3. What percent of U.S. processed food contains some genetically modified corn or soybean product? 4. All known food allergies are caused by one type of molecule. Is it proteins, sugars, or fats? 5. What is the substance called “bt” used for? a. Bonus: What does “bt” stand for? b. Bonus: When was “bt” first registered with the USDA? 6. What does “totipotent” mean? 7. What nutrient is produced by “golden rice”? 8. According to the World Health Organization, how many children go blind each year from vitamin A deficiency? 9. What is the normal function of “anti-thrombin”? 10. For what was “Dolly the sheep” famous? 11.
  • Gene Cloningcloningcloning

    Gene Cloningcloningcloning

    GeneGeneGene CloningCloningCloning 20042004 SeungwookSeungwookKim Kim Chem.Chem. && Bio.Bio. Eng.Eng. Reference z T.A. Brown, Gene Cloning, Chapman and Hall z S.B. Primrose, Molecular Biotechnology, Blackwell 1 Why Gene Cloning is Important? z A century ago, Gregor Mendel : { Basic assumption (each heritable property of an organism) is controlled by a factor (gene). z In 1900, Mandel's law Æ the birth of genetics. z what these genes are and exactly how they work The Early Development of Genetics z In 1903, Sutton, W { Proposed that genes reside on chromosomes 2 z In 1910, Morgan, TH { Experimental backing on that --> development of the techniques for gene mapping (To establish the structure or structural details or location) { By 1922, a comprehensive analysis of the relative positions of over 2000 genes on the four chromosomes of the fruit fly. (Drosophilia melanogaster) z In 1944, Avery, MacLeod and McCarty z In 1952, Hershey and Chase { Experimental results were shown that DNA is the genetic material. { Conventional idea : genes were made of protein z In 1952-1966, Delbruck, Chargaff, Crick and Monod { The structure of DNA was elucidated. { The genetic code was cracked. { The process of transcription and translation were described. 3 The Advent of Gene Cloning z In the late 1960's ; The experimental techniques were not sophisticated. z In 1971 ~ 1973 ; A new experimental techniques were developed. { Recombinant DNA technology or Genetic engineering based on the process of gene cloning { This led to rapid and efficient DNA sequencing techniques that enabled the structures of individual genes to be determined. z In the 1990s ; started with massive genome sequencing projects including the human project.
  • Tissue Culture and Cloning of Carnegiea Gigantea, Cactaceae

    Tissue Culture and Cloning of Carnegiea Gigantea, Cactaceae

    Tissue Culture and Cloning of Carnegiea gigantea, Cactaceae Item Type Article Authors Baker, William P.; Hanks, Tyrone Harvard; Marin, Louis Eduardo Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 26/09/2021 08:33:25 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554346 BakerCloning 13 and Tinus 1996; Guibert 1996; O'Dea et al. 1995; Ritchie Tissue Culture and Cloning of 1997). Carnegiea gigantea, Cactaceae Cloning of these plants allows multiple copies to be pro- duced from superior genotypes without the time and expense William P. Baker of traditional methods. Tissue culture and cloning, however, Tyrone Harvard Hanks are not routinely used to cultivate members of the cactus family. According to Havel and Kolar (1983), "one of the Biomedical Sciences reasons can be seen in the morphological structure of cacti Midwestern University making the traditional way of explant isolation and surface 19555 North 59th Avenue sterilization of the plant material difficult." Glendale, Arizona 85308 [email protected] Material and Methods In this study, in vitro clones were produced from phenotypi- cally selected, commercially available saguaro. Eight plants Louis Eduardo Marin measuring 8 -10 cm tall were purchased from a local nurs- Life Science Department ery. Stem portions were excised, dipped in 95% ethanol, and flamed to burn off the needles. The cooled samples were Mesa Community College sterilized by soaking in 10% sodium hypochlorite (10% v/v 1833 West Southern Avenue in dH2O) for 5 minutes. They were rinsed once in distilled Mesa, Arizona 85202 H20, surface sterilized in 95% ethanol, flamed and trans- ferred to a sterile surface.