DOCSLIB.ORG

Cloning the DNA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cloning the DNA Making the Libraries Cloning the DNA he cells have been cultured, the each strand: 2 I A as a cloning vector. that is. as a medium chromosomes isolated and sorted. capable of accommodating foreign DNA seg- T Now can begin the final act in the ments for replication. Charon 21A is a modi- making of a library—that of multiplying the DNA in the sorted chromosomes by a factor DNA molecule is about 42,000 base pairs of more than a million. Some tricks of re- long, terminates with short stretches of combinant DNA technology make such great single-stranded DNA, and includes a single amplification possible, and the magicians EcoRI is produced by certain strains of the EcoRI cleavage site.) The DNA molecules who perform these tricks are lowly but ac- bacterium Escherichia coli as a defense extracted from the phages are cut by EcoRI commodating bacteria and viruses. against infection by the DNA of bacterio- into two "arms.” The cut ends of these arms Briefly, four steps are involved in cloning phages. The enzyme severs the viral DNA are then stripped of- a phosphate group (for a the DNA: preparation of DNA fragments and thus prevents its propagation in the reason to be explained later) by treatment from the sorted chromosomes and from bacterium. (To avoid self-destruction, the with the enzyme alkaline phosphatase. bacterial viruses (bacteriophages, or simply bacterium also produces another enzyme The next step is fairly simple, at least in phages); formation of recombinant DNA that modifies its own DNA so that it cannot theory. We mix the two DNA preparations molecules including both chromosomal and be severed by EcoRI.) other bacterial species and let nature take its course—nature in this viral DNA fragments: assembly of phages produce restriction enzymes that recognize case meaning the tendency for single strands containing the recombinant DNA molecules: other sequences. For example, HindIII, the of DNA to “stick together” (become linked and cloning of the phages (and hence replica- restriction enzyme used by our collaborators by hydrogen bonds) at regions with com- tion of the chromosomal DNA fragments) in at Livermore for their phase I libraries, is plementary bases, Since the cutting action of a bacterial host. For concreteness we de- produced by the bacterium Hemophilus in- EcoRI has equipped both the chromosomal scribe, and illustrate in the accompanying fluenzae. Like EcoRI, HindIII recognizes a DNA fragments and the vector arms with figure, the making of what we call a Phase I six-base sequence (–A–A–G-T–T--T–) just such sticky ends. aggregates consisting of’ library, one based on relatively small and makes staggered cuts. two arms linked by a (single) chromosomal chromosomal DNA fragments. (Our Phase 11 Complete digestion of the chromosomal DNA fragment will form. (Herein lies the libraries, which will serve a different DNA with EcoRI (or HindIII) produces a set reason for gentle extraction of the DNA from purpose, will be based on larger fragments. ) of relatively small flagments. We can esti- the chromosomes: physical breaks do not First the DNA molecules in the sorted mate the average length of these fragments result in sticky ends. ) These aggregates arc chromosomes must be extracted from the by assuming a random distribution along the then converted into intact DNA molecules other chromosomal components. For rea- chromosomal DNA of equal numbers of the by treatment with the enzyme DNA ligase, sons that will become clear later, this extrac- four bases A, T, G, and C. Then the prob- which establishes a covalent bond at the tion must be performed very gently to mini- ability of any six successive bases being the break along each strand. The result is a set of mize breaking the very long and very fragile EcoRI (or HindIII) recognition sequence is recombinant DNA molecules—that is, mol- DNA molecules. (1/4)6, which implies an average of about ecules of phage DNA carrying human DNA The extracted DNA is then digested with 4100 base pairs between cleavage sites, (An fragments. (To increase the probability of the restriction enzyme EcoRI, which rec- intact DNA molecule in the largest human forming recombinant aggregates. the ognizes the sequence of six bases chromosome (number 1) is about 2.5 X 108 chromosomal fragments are mixed with an –G–A–A–T–T–C– and, as shown below, base pairs in length. ) excess of arms. Therefore, many of the ag- cuts the DNA at each occurrence of’ this We, and our collaborators at Livermore, gregates formed will consist simply of two sequence by breaking one covalent bond on use DNA from the bacteriopbage Charon arms. But DNA ligase cannot repair the 86 Spring/Summer 1985 LOS ALAMOS SCIENCE Genes by Mail Extract DNA III. CLONING THE: DNA DNA in such aggregates because of the miss- what genes or combinations of genes are ing phosphate groups, So our foresight in the involved; in fact, we haven’t come close to previous step reduces the background of settling even the nature-versus-nurture issue. Digest with EcoRI nonrecombinant DNA molecules in the final And even when a single defective gene is library.) known to be the culprit—as it is in certain Next we assemble Charon 21A phages, kinds of mental retardation—developing the drawing on proteins produced by mutant techniques for introducing the normal gene varieties of the phage for the necessary struc- and getting it expressed properly will take a tural components and on our supply of re- long time. combinant DNA molecules for the genetic HILDEBRAYD: Yes, routine clinical ap- component. This step unavoidably in- plication of gene therapy is a long way off, troduces a deficiency in the resulting library: especially in light of the ethical and legal those recombinant DNA molecules contain- questions it raises, But in the process of Mix and Treat ing fragments longer than about 9100 base ironing out those questions, society should with DNA Ligase pairs are too large to be encased in the heads focus on the extraordinary benefits to be of the phages, and therefore the library will derived from the technology rather than its lack that portion (about 33 mass percent) of “Brave New World” implications. the chromosomal DNA residing on such MOYZIS: I think other developments in fragments. It is for this reason that we and molecular genetics pose more immediate our collaborators at Livermore use different concerns. For instance. the availability of- restriction enzymes and thus produce li- probes specific to the X and Y chromosomes braries based on different sets of chromo- has made it very easy to determine the sex of Assemble Phages somal DNA fragments. The expectation is a fetus. Since even in "sexually liberatcd” that the DNA missing from one laboratory’s western countries the preference for having a I version of a library will be found in the other, male child first is still strong. routine de- The final step in making the libraries, that termination of fetal sex could conceivably of cloning the recombinant DNA molecules, lead to dramatic changes in the ratio of the is accomplished by seeding the phages onto a sexes. The ethical. social, and economic im- “lawn,” or monolayer, of an appropriate plications of this possibility need immediate strain of E. coli, When a phage injects its consideration. Infect Bacteria recombinant DNA molecule into such a cell, SCIENCE: Are issues such as these heavy on the biological apparatus of the cell is your mind as you go about your research? subverted to production of new phages. The CRAM: I don’t think so. The goals of basic cell ruptures when between one and two research arc information and understanding. hundred new phages have been produced, It’s up to society to determine how those are and these then infect surrounding cells. The applied. Take the photoelectric effect, for process continues. resulting in formation of a example. Its applications are mainly viewed plaque, or clear area, in the translucent lawn as beneficial, although a few may be regarded of bacteria. In each plaque arc some one to by some as deplorable. But a scientist doesn’t ten million infective phages, each containing hide his head in the sand in the face of Collect Library of Cloned Phages an exact copy of the recombinant DNA information that can possibly be applied in a molecule carried by the original infecting harmful way. phage. MOYZIS: I would second that. You can’t be These vastly multiplied recombinant paralyzed because a bit of knowledge can be DNA molecules, then, constitute a library- used inappropriately. And 1 repeat that most conveniently and safely packaged within the of the worrisome aspects of gene therapy are proteinaceous armor of phages. This con- a long way down the road. A major problem struction of a library puts us at the starting that must he solved before it can be applied line. Its application to problems of clinical to many diseases is how to introduce the and fundamental significance lies ahead. ■ good genes into only the appropriate CellS of LOS ALAMOS SCIENCE Spring/Summer 1985 87.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2006 Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals The Humane Society of the United States Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, and the Other Genetics and Genomics Commons Recommended Citation The Humane Society of the United States, "Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals" (2006). IMPACTS ON FARM ANIMALS. 21. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals/21 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Farm Animal Welfare • The HSUS 2100 L St., N.W. • Washington, DC 20037 • HSUS.org 202-452-1100 • F: 301-258-3081 • FarmAnimalWelfare.org An HSUS Report: Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals Abstract Developments in biotechnology have raised new concerns about animal welfare, as farm animals now have their genomes modified (genetically engineered) or copied (cloned) to propagate certain traits useful to agribusiness, such as meat yield or feed conversion. These animals suffer from unusually high rates of birth defects, disabili- ties, and premature death. Genetically engineering farm animals for greater bone strength or reduced pain reception, for example, may result in improved well-being, yet the broad use of this technology often causes increased suffering. The limited success of gene insertion techniques can result in genes failing to reach target cells and finishing in cells of unintended organs, and abnormally developed embryos may die in utero, be infertile, or born with development defects, attributable in part to insertional problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloning: Adult Vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work Spring 5-2001 Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed Rebecca Ruth Frazor University of Tennessee-Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Frazor, Rebecca Ruth, "Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed" (2001). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/459 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: Getec eCA f?- f(CAZOr College: AQn eMi:hA rv Department: A1 (met I SCi!A1w -J Faculty Mentor: F. N-S ChV\C ¥: PROJECT TITLE: C10l/1\(}q : Adult \[) ' fmmrVVl l0 C l, (( ~ ~rd the. ~ Qr\L\A<; Icchn \ quc ~ Emplo\( f d I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commens rate with rs level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ;. ./-1 Faculty Mentor Date: _-+-'""-+----L-___ Comments (Optional): Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Various Techniques Employed Rebecca R. Frazor Mentor: F. Neal Schrick Senior Honors Project May 2001 Abstract The cloning of amphibians and mainly mammals is discussed focusing on somatic cell usage. Significant progress has been made in recent years and this is outlined with an emphasis on techniques and their differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Cloning of DNA Fragments Produced by Restriction
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 1537-1541, May 1976 Biochemistry Molecular cloning of DNA fragments produced by restriction endonucleases SailI and BamI (DNA joining/plasmid/insertional inactivation of genes/Drosophila melanogaster) DEAN H. HAMER AND CHARLES A. THOMAS, JR. Department of Biological Chemistry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Communicated by Bernard D. Dats, February 25,1976 ABSTRACT The highly specific restriction endonucleases cleaves various DNAs about once every 8 kb (kilobases), as SalI and BamI produce DNA fragments with complementary, compared to about once every 4 kb for EcoRI (16, 18). The cohesive termini that can be covalently joined by DNA ligase. resulting fragments have cohesive termini, and can be joined The Escherichia coli kanamycin resistance factor pML21 has to one another in head-to-tail, head-to-head, and one Sall site, at which DNA can be inserted without interfering probably with the expression of drug resistance or replication of the tail-to-tail orientation. Another highly specific restriction en- plasmid. A more convenient cloning vehicle can be made with donuclease that produces cohesive termini is BamI, from Ba- the tetracycline resistance factor pSC101, since insertion of cillus amyloliqefaciens H (G. Wilson and F. Young, personal DNA either at its single site for Sall or at that for BamI inacti- communication). We have shown that it cleaves D. melano- vates plasmid-specified drug resistance but not replication. To gaster DNA about once every 6 kb. This report describes the take advantage of this insertional inactivation, pSC101 was construction and verification of plasmid vehicles that allow one joined to a ColEl-ampicillin resistance plasmid having no Sall site, and to a ColEl-kanamycin resistance plasmid having no to clone and amplify potentially any DNA fragment produced BamI site.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Cloning and Refactoring of a Silent Lipopeptide Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Yields the Antibiotic Taromycin A
    Direct cloning and refactoring of a silent lipopeptide biosynthetic gene cluster yields the antibiotic taromycin A Kazuya Yamanakaa,b, Kirk A. Reynoldsa,c, Roland D. Kerstena, Katherine S. Ryana,d, David J. Gonzaleze, Victor Nizete,f, Pieter C. Dorresteina,c,f, and Bradley S. Moorea,f,1 aScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; bYokohama Research Center, JNC Corporation, Yokohama 236-8605, Japan; cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; dDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V62 1Z4; and Departments of ePediatrics and fSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 Edited by Jerrold Meinwald, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and approved December 23, 2013 (received for review October 23, 2013) Recent developments in next-generation sequencing technologies genes (9, 10). Synthetic biology approaches also can be used to have brought recognition of microbial genomes as a rich resource refactor orphan gene clusters by optimizing promoters, tran- for novel natural product discovery. However, owing to the scar- scriptional regulation, ribosome-binding sites, and even codon city of efficient procedures to connect genes to molecules, only use (11). Examples of successful regulatory gene manipulation to a small fraction of secondary metabolomes have been investigated elicit the production of new natural products from silent bio- to date. Transformation-associated recombination (TAR) cloning synthetic gene clusters in WT strains have been reported in takes advantage of the natural in vivo homologous recombination bacteria and fungi (12, 13); however, this approach requires the of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to directly capture large genomic loci.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolly the Sheep – the First Cloned Adult Animal
    DOLLY THE SHEEP – THE FIRST CLONED ADULT ANIMAL NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR IMPROVING LIVESTOCK From Squidonius via Wikimedia Commons In 1996, University of Edinburgh scientists celebrated the birth of Dolly the Sheep, the first mammal to be cloned using SCNT cloning is the only technology adult somatic cells. The Edinburgh team’s success followed available that enables generation of 99.8% its improvements to the single cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) genetically identical offspring from selected technique used in the cloning process. individuals of adult animals (including sterilized animals). As such, it is being Dolly became a scientific icon recognised worldwide and exploited as an efficient multiplication tool SCNT technology has spread around the world and has been to support specific breeding strategies of used to clone multiple farm animals. farm animals with exceptionally high genetic The cloning of livestock enables growing large quantities of value. the most productive, disease resistant animals, thus providing more food and other animal products. Sir Ian Wilmut (Inaugural Director of MRC Centre for Regeneration and Professor at CMVM, UoE) and colleagues worked on methods to create genetically improved livestock by manipulation of stem cells using nuclear transfer. Their research optimised interactions between the donor nucleus and the recipient cytoplasm at the time of fusion and during the first cell cycle. Nuclear donor cells were held in mitosis before being released and used as they were expected to be passing through G1 phase. CLONING IN COMMERCE, CONSERVATION OF AGRICULTURE AND PRESERVATION ANIMAL BREEDS OF LIVESTOCK DIVERSITY Cloning has been used to conserve several animal breeds in the recent past.
    [Show full text]
  • How They Cloned a Sheep
    How They Cloned A Sheep How They Cloned A Sheep This text is provided courtesy of the American Museum of Natural History. How they cloned a sheep 1. Scientists took udder cells from Dolly's DNA mother. They let the cells multiply and then they stopped the process when they had divided enough. 2. They took an egg cell from a different sheep and removed the nucleus. 3. They put one udder cell next to the egg cell without a nucleus and joined them using electricity. The egg cell now contained all the udder cell's DNA. 4.The egg cell divided until it developed into an embryo. An embryo is the early stage of an animal before it has been born or hatched. This embryo was placed inside a third sheep. Five months later, this sheep gave birth to Dolly. ReadWorks.org · © 2015 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved. How They Cloned A Sheep - Comprehension Questions Answer Key 1. What did scientists remove from the egg cell of a sheep? A. the nucleus B. the embryo C. DNA D. udder cells 2. This passage describes the sequence of events involved in cloning a sheep. What happened after the scientists took udder cells and an egg cell from different sheep? A. The egg cell was joined to an udder cell using electricity. B. The embryo was placed inside another sheep. C. Scientists took udder cells from Dolly's DNA mother. D. The egg cell divided until it formed an embryo. 3. As part of the process of cloning a sheep, scientists placed the embryo inside a sheep, which eventually gave birth to Dolly.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cloning: Fact Or Fiction
    LRN: 05D1721 745. 6239 - i/3 Human Cloning: Fact or Fiction An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor's Degree by Krisha S. Murthy Christopher Tereshko Daniel J. Caloia Amy Borges Date: May 3, 2005 Professor Thomas A. Shannon, Major Advisor 1 Abstract Human Cloning: Fact or Fiction is an evaluation of the portrayal of cloning in the media. Cloning technology has not only made a huge impact in the scientific community, but it has also affected the general community. Cloning is often misrepresented in literature and films, however, giving the public only a partial picture of the different aspects of cloning, such as religion, ethics, and government. Informing them of the facts of cloning technology will form better educated opinions. 2 Section 1 - Introduction In 1997, Dolly was created and cloning became a household word. Before this event, cloning was just a possibility, a fictional thread to weave together tales of science fiction. Once Dolly was born, however, there could be serious talk of cloning and these stories that once seemed like fiction could be considered reality. However, can stories like this really be considered reality? In most fictional books and movies, cloning starts as an amazing scientific breakthrough. However, one or more characters take advantage of the technology and attempt to create, for instance, the perfect army, or a Hitler for the current generation. It could even be as innocent as creating clones to help do a particular tedious task, but even then they get out of hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloning of Gene Coding Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Using Puc18 Vector
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2015, 5(3):52-57 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU Cloning of gene coding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase using puc18 vector Manoj Kumar Dooda, Akhilesh Kushwaha *, Aquib Hasan and Manish Kushwaha Institute of Transgene Life Sciences, Lucknow (U.P), India _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The term recombinant DNA technology, DNA cloning, molecular cloning, or gene cloning all refers to the same process. Gene cloning is a set of experimental methods in molecular biology and useful in many areas of research and for biomedical applications. It is the production of exact copies (clones) of a particular gene or DNA sequence using genetic engineering techniques. cDNA is synthesized by using template RNA isolated from blood sample (human). GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) is one of the most commonly used housekeeping genes used in comparisons of gene expression data. Amplify the gene (GAPDH) using primer forward and reverse with the sequence of 5’-TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAA-3’ and 5’-TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTGGGCCAT- 3’.pUC18 high copy cloning vector for replication in E. coli, suitable for “blue-white screening” technique and cleaved with the help of SmaI restriction enzyme. Modern cloning vectors include selectable markers (most frequently antibiotic resistant marker) that allow only cells in which the vector but necessarily the insert has been transfected to grow. Additionally the cloning vectors may contain color selection markers which provide blue/white screening (i.e. alpha complementation) on X- Gal and IPTG containing medium. Keywords: RNA isolation; TRIzol method; Gene cloning; Blue/white screening; Agarose gel electrophoresis.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Clone Ref V1-2
    A primer on cloning in E. coli Michael Nonet Department of Neuroscience Washington University Medical School St Louis, MO 63110 Draft 1.2.1 Nov. 10, 2019 Things to add: gel electrophoresis methods basic bacteriology methods Index Overview E. coli vectors! 6 Types of E. coli vectors! 6 Components of typical plasmid vectors! 6 Origin of replication! 6 Antibiotic resistance genes! 7 Master Cloning Sites! 7 LacZ"! 7 ccdB ! 8 Design of DNA constructs! 9 Choice of vector! 9 Source of insert! 9 Plasmids! 9 Genomic or cDNA! 9 Synthetic DNA! 10 Overview of different approaches to creating clones! 10 Restriction enzyme based cloning! 10 Single vs. double cut method! 11 Blunt vs “sticky” restriction sites! 11 Typical methodology for restriction enzyme cloning! 11 Golden Gate style cloning! 12 Typical methodology for Golden Gate cloning! 12 Gateway cloning! 13 Typical methodology for Gateway cloning! 14 Gibson assembly cloning! 15 Typical procedure for Gibson assembly! 15 Site directed mutagenesis! 16 PCR overlap approach! 16 DpnI mediated site directed mutagenesis! 16 Typical procedure for site directed mutagenesis! 17 Detailed methodology for all five methods Restriction enzyme cloning! 18 Designing the cloning strategy ! 18 Determining which vector to use! 18 Designing the insert fragment! 19 Designing primers! 19 Vector preparation! 19 Insert preparation! 19 Detailed protocol! 20 Step 1: Design oligonucleotides to amplify the product of interest! 20 Step 2: PCR amplification of insert DNA! 20 Step 3: Clean-up purification of PCR product! 21 Step 4: Digestion of products! 21 Step 5: Gel purification of products! 22 Step 6: Ligation! 22 Step 7: Transformation of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Applications of Genetic Engineering and Cloning in Farm Animals
    Journal of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences ISSN: 2573-2196 Review Article Dairy and Vet Sci J Volume 4 Issue 1 - October 2017 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Ayalew Negash DOI: 10.19080/JDVS.2017.04.555629 Review on Applications of Genetic Engineering And Cloning in Farm animals Eyachew Ayana1, Gizachew Fentahun2, Ayalew Negash3*, Fentahun Mitku1, Mebrie Zemene3 and Fikre Zeru4 1Candidate of Veterinary medicine, University of Gondar, Ethiopia 2Candidate of Veterinary medicine, Samara University, Ethiopia 3Lecturer at University of Gondar, University of Gondar, Ethiopia 4Samara University, Ethiopia Submission: July 10, 2017; Published: October 02, 2017 *Corresponding author: Ayalew Negash, Lecturer at University of Gondar, College of Veterinary Medicine and science, University of Gondar, P.O. 196, Gondar, Ethiopia, Email: Abstract Genetic engineering involves producing transgenic animal’s models by using different techniques such as exogenous pronuclear DNA highly applicable and crucial technology which involves increasing animal production and productivity, increases animal disease resistance andmicroinjection biomedical in application. zygotes, injection Cloning ofinvolves genetically the production modified embryonicof animals thatstem are cells genetically into blastocysts identical and to theretrovirus donor nucleus.mediated The gene most transfer. commonly It is applied and recent technique is somatic cell nuclear transfer in which the nucleus from body cell is transferred to an egg cell to create an embryo that is virtually identical to the donor nucleus. There are different applications of cloning which includes: rapid multiplication of desired livestock, and post-natal viabilities. Beside to this Food safety, animal welfare, public and social acceptance and religious institutions are the most common animal conservation and research model.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cloning Guide the First Step Towards a Succesful Igem Project Igem Bonn NRP-UEA Igem
    The Cloning Guide The first step towards a succesful iGEM Project iGEM Bonn NRP-UEA iGEM iGEM Manchester-Graz iGEM Evry iGEM Vanderbilt iGEM Minnesota Carnegie Mellon iGEM iGEM Sydney UIUC iGEM iGEM York iGEM Toulouse iGEM Pasteur UCLA iGEM iGEM Stockholm Preface The cloning guide which is lying before you or on your desktop is a document brought to you by iGEM TU Eindhoven in collaboration with numerous iGEM (International Genetically Engi- neered Machine) teams during iGEM 2015. An important part in the iGEM competition is the collabration of your own team with other teams. These collaborations are fully in line with the dedications of the iGEM Foundation on education and competition, the advancement of syn- thetic biology, and the development of an open community and collaboration. Collaborations between groups of (undergrad and overgrad) students can lead to nice products, as we have tried to provide one for you in 2015. In order to compile a cloning guide, several iGEM teams from all over the world have been con- tacted to cooperate on this. Finally fifiteen teams contributed in a fantastic way and a cloning guide consisting of the basics about nine different cloning methods and experiences of teams working with them has been realized. Without the help of all collaborating teams this guide could never have been realized, so we will thank all teams in advance. This guide may be of great help when new iGEM teams (edition 2016 and later) are at the point of designing their project. How to assemble the construct for you project, is an important choice which is possibly somewhat easier to make after reading this guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloning and Genetic Engineering of Farm Animals
    INVESTOR BRIEFING NO. 6 SEPTEMBER 2012 Cloning and Genetic Engineering of Farm Animals ABSTRACT Cloning and the genetic modification of farm animals are becoming more common in intensive farming systems in many countries. These procedures can have adverse impacts on the welfare of animals involved and their descendents. Cloning is primarily used to produce identical copies of high yielding and fast growing breeds of animals. The practice is already established in the US, Brazil, Argentina and Japan. Within Europe, however, there has been widespread opposition – on both animal welfare and ethical grounds – to the cloning of animals for food production and to the sale of meat and dairy products from cloned animals and their descendents. The genetic engineering of farm animals is used in China, the US and Australia to enhance growth rates, increase disease resistance and alter meat and milk composition. The European Commission (EC) is currently considering how to regulate the production and use of GM animals. Introduction The cloning of farm animals for food production is already under way in a number of countries including the US, Brazil, Argentina and Japan. In the EU, however, cloning has become a controversial issue, with the European Commission (EC) being firmly opposed to the cloning of animals for food production and to the sale of meat and dairy products from clones and their descendants. Interestingly, the opposition of the EC and animal welfare organisations is based on animal welfare and ethical grounds rather than on food safety concerns. While the science currently indicates that food from clones and their descendants does not raise food safety issues, it may be too early to be confident about this.
    [Show full text]