DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ecori Endonuclease (Temperature-Sensitive Ecori Mutants/DNA Ligase/SOS Response/DNA Repair) JOSEPH HEITMAN, NORTON D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ecori Endonuclease (Temperature-Sensitive Ecori Mutants/DNA Ligase/SOS Response/DNA Repair) JOSEPH HEITMAN, NORTON D Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 86, pp. 2281-2285, April 1989 Genetics Repair of the Escherichia coli chromosome after in vivo scission by the EcoRI endonuclease (temperature-sensitive EcoRI mutants/DNA ligase/SOS response/DNA repair) JOSEPH HEITMAN, NORTON D. ZINDER, AND PETER MODEL The Rockefeller University, New York, N.Y. 10021 Contributed by Norton D. Zinder, November 22, 1988 ABSTRACT We prepared a set of temperature-sensitive Table 1. E. coli strains mutants of the EcoRI endonuclease. Under semipermissive Strain Relevant genotype Source conditions, Escherichia coli strains bearing these alleles form poorly growing colonies in which intracellular substrates are HB101 recAJ3 Ref. 16 cleaved at EcoRI sites and the SOS DNA repair response is JH11 HB101 recAp This study induced. Strains defective in SOS induction (lexA3 mutant) or JH20 K91 IexA3 Ref. 15 SOS induction and recombination (recA56 and recB21 mu- JH27 K91 recA56 This study tants) are not more sensitive to this in vivo DNA scission, JH39 dinDl::Mu dI(Apr lac) Ref. 15 whereas strains deficient in DNA ligase (lig4 and Ug ts7mutants) JH59 JH39 recA56 Ref. 15 are extremely sensitive. We conclude that although DNA JH117 JH39 recB21 thyA::TnJO This study scission induces the SOS response, neither this induction nor JH137 K91 dinDl::Mu dI(Apr lac) This study JH144 K91 recN262 tyrAl6::TnlO This study recombination are required for repair. DNA ligase is necessary JH145 K91 recB2l thyA::TnJO This study and may be sufficient to repair EcoRI-mediated DNA breaks in JH154 JH39 lexA3 maIE::TnJO This study the E. coli chromosome. K38 HfrC (A) Ref. 15 K91 K38 (A-) Ref. 15 DNA double-strand breaks stimulate recombination in Esch- N1626 lig4 Refs. 17 and 18 erichia coli and yeast (1, 2), and recombination is generally N2603 Iig+ Refs. 17 and 18 thought to repair such DNA breaks (1-3). Repair of DNA N2604 lig ts7 Refs. 17 and 18 scissions has been studied previously using y-ray lesions (4); in E. coli, prior induction of the SOS DNA repair response UV sensitivity, and recN mutants were identified by mito- enhances the repair of DNA cleaved by y rays (5). The SOS mycin C sensitivity. Indicator medium contained 5- response is an altered physiological state that arises after bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl B3-D-galactoside (X-Gal) at 35 DNA damage and is due to the induction ofa set ofgenes, the Ag/ml. products of which slow cell division and repair DNA (6). To DNA Manipulations. Plasmid pAN4, a pBR322 derivative, repair DNA cleaved by y rays (4, 5, 7) two SOS proteins encodes the EcoRI restriction-modification system and am- involved in recombination, RecA and RecN, and multiple picillin resistance (19). The EcoRI methylase gene of pAN4 copies of the genome are required, suggesting that recombi- was inactivated by inserting a BamHI fragment carrying the nation repairs these lesions. Some -ray breaks may also be kanamycin resistance gene (20) into the Bcl I site within repaired by ligation (8). the methylase gene (Fig. 1). Plasmid pJC1 is a pACYC184 A model for the repair of DNA scission cannot be based derivative that encodes the EcoRI methylase and chloram- solely on the repair of -ray lesions, because y rays not only phenicol resistance (21). Plasmid pJH15b carries the fl cleave DNA but also cause nicks and base adducts and intergenic region (nucleotides 5486-5941) inserted as a Cla I produce free radicals that can oxidize proteins (9). In fact, linked Bgl II fragment in the Cla I site of pJH10 (Fig. 1). single-strand nicks are 10- to 20-fold more abundant than Plasmid pJH71 was derived by partial Pvu II cleavage of double-strand breaks after -ray treatment (10). Further- pJH15b, addition of BamHI linkers, treatment with BamHI more, DNA scission by y rays can release a base and leave and Bgi II, and ligation to delete the N-terminal half of the blunt termini with 5'-phosphoryl and 3'-phosphoryl or 3'- endonuclease gene. phosphoglycolate ends that cannot be ligated (11). Mutagenesis, Mapping, and Sequencing. Mutants were In contrast, restriction endonucleases cleave DNA to yield spontaneous or nitrosoguanidine induced (22). After muta- staggered or blunt double-strand breaks with 3'-hydroxyl and genesis, plasmid DNA was prepared after overnight growth 5'-phosphoryl termini (12). We have studied repair of stag- or cells were grown for 1 hr, infected with fl helper phage gered double-strand DNA breaks delivered with the EcoRI R176 or R189 (23), and grown overnight to obtain a trans- endonuclease, which cleaves within the DNA sequence ducing particle lysate. Mutations were mapped by ligating GAATTC (13). mutant and wild-type (wt) restriction fragments and scoring the phenotype of the hybrid or by heteroduplex deletion MATERIALS AND METHODS mapping (24) with a set of known EcoRI deletions. The relevant region (mutants TSO and TS3) or entire gene (mu- Bacterial Strains. Strains for assaying SOS induction carry tants TS6, TS9, and RA2) was sequenced by the dideoxy- the dinDl::Mu dI(Apr lac) fusion (14) and are listed in Table nucleotide chain-termination method. The RA2 mutant was 1 [see also ref. 15]. Phage P1 transductions were as described isolated from nitrosoguanidine-mutagenized pJH15b plasmid (15). Strains carrying recA, recB, or IexA3 were identified by DNA in strain JH137 by screening for an SOS-induced colony that was viable at 30'C and 420C without methylase. The The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" Abbreviations: TS, temperature-sensitive; X-Gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro- in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. 3-indolyl 8-D-galactoside; wt, wild-type. 2281 Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021 2282 Genetics: Heitman et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989) 0/ 6550 pJH 5blb1 12 TC 4-HindIII 140 I'P2M pJH15b~/3 7000 bp Bg/ II 2880 Bw,,H I 34 Hind III 3085 R+ M R M+ FIG. 1. Compatible plasmid system. The EcoRI endonuclease (R) and methylase (M) genes were cloned on the compatible plasmids pJH10 (or pJHl5b) and pJC1. After mutagenesis the methylase plasmid was linearized to prevent transformation or the endonuclease plasmid pJHl5b was selectively packaged with fl helper phage. single EcoRI site of pJH10 or pJHl5b was destroyed in some The effect of these TS endonuclease alleles on colony cases [TSOARI (pJH12), TS6ARI (pJH125), and RA2ARI growth of strain K91 is shown in Table 2. At semipermissive (pJH124)] by treatment with EcoRI, the Klenow fragment of temperatures, the colonies are flat and translucent and grow DNA polymerase I, and T4 DNA ligase. poorly. By microscopic examination, these cells are fila- Cellular Extracts. Cell paste from 100-ml cultures of strain mented. At 30TC, where the endonucleases are most active, K91 (TS#/pJC1) grown at 30°C was resuspended in 1 ml of some TS mutants impair growth (TS3 and TS9), whereas extract buffer (100 mM NaCI/50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4/10 others are lethal (TSO and TS6). Lethality is not attributable mM MgSO4/bovine serum albumin at 1 mg/ml/1 mM phe- to restriction and plasmid loss, because derivatives lacking nylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and sonicated (6 x 20 sec) on ice. the EcoRI site [TSOARI (pJH12) and TS6ARI (pJH125)] were After centrifugation for 20 min in a microcentrifuge and 3 hr as lethal (see Table 2). at 100,000 x g, the supernatant was mixed 1:1 with glycerol Restriction of Phage A. Strains bearing these EcoRI muta- and stored at -20°C. tions are rescued for growth by the EcoRI methylase, expressed from plasmid pJC1 (Table 2). Thus, the cleavage specificity of the mutants is unaltered, and the endonuclease RESULTS activity can be assessed by measuring restriction of phage A Isolation of EcoRI Temperature-Sensitive (TS) Alleles. The growth. Table 3 shows that restriction by the wt system was endonuclease and its methylase gene were first separated on unaffected by temperature. In contrast, with the exception of the compatible plasmids pJC1 and pJH10 as described and TS3, restriction by the TS mutants increased dramatically shown in Fig. 1. Methylation protects the cellular DNA from with decreasing temperature. EcoRI-modified A vir plated cleavage, and thus the endonuclease plasmid pJH10 (R+M-, with unit efficiency in all cases (data not shown). For most where R = endonuclease activity and M = methylase mutants, substantial restriction activity was present at tem- activity) is lethal to cells lacking the methylase plasmid pJC1 peratures at which the cell would still be viable without (R-M+). A nitrosoguanidine-mutagenized mixture ofplasmid methylase. DNA was prepared, treated with BamHI to linearize pJC1 In Vivo DNA Cleavage. Plasmid pJH10 carries one EcoRI but spare pJH10, and introduced into strain HB101 or K91. site that should be cleaved in cells bearing a TS EcoRI Because linear DNA transforms wt E. coli at low efficiency, endonuclease allele grown at nonpermissive temperatures. this operation separates plasmid pJH10 from pJC1. Cells that acquire a wt copy of pJH10 (R+M-) suffer DNA degradation Table 2. Effect of EcoRI TS mutants on colony growth of and die. Surviving transformants carry mutants with reduced strain K91 endonuclease activity. By selecting survivors at 42°C and Mutant replica-plating to 30°C, we obtained an EcoRI mutant (TSO) Name Description 300C 340C 370C 420C which was temperature sensitive. Strains K91 or HB101 expressing this allele are viable at 42°C, form colonies poorly TS0 Thr-261-Ile - - + + + + at 37°C, and die at 34°C or 30°C. Thus, the TS EcoRI TS3 Leu-263--oPhe ++ ++++ ++++ +++++ endonuclease activity renders cell growth sensitive to cold.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Cloning of DNA Fragments Produced by Restriction
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 1537-1541, May 1976 Biochemistry Molecular cloning of DNA fragments produced by restriction endonucleases SailI and BamI (DNA joining/plasmid/insertional inactivation of genes/Drosophila melanogaster) DEAN H. HAMER AND CHARLES A. THOMAS, JR. Department of Biological Chemistry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Communicated by Bernard D. Dats, February 25,1976 ABSTRACT The highly specific restriction endonucleases cleaves various DNAs about once every 8 kb (kilobases), as SalI and BamI produce DNA fragments with complementary, compared to about once every 4 kb for EcoRI (16, 18). The cohesive termini that can be covalently joined by DNA ligase. resulting fragments have cohesive termini, and can be joined The Escherichia coli kanamycin resistance factor pML21 has to one another in head-to-tail, head-to-head, and one Sall site, at which DNA can be inserted without interfering probably with the expression of drug resistance or replication of the tail-to-tail orientation. Another highly specific restriction en- plasmid. A more convenient cloning vehicle can be made with donuclease that produces cohesive termini is BamI, from Ba- the tetracycline resistance factor pSC101, since insertion of cillus amyloliqefaciens H (G. Wilson and F. Young, personal DNA either at its single site for Sall or at that for BamI inacti- communication). We have shown that it cleaves D. melano- vates plasmid-specified drug resistance but not replication. To gaster DNA about once every 6 kb. This report describes the take advantage of this insertional inactivation, pSC101 was construction and verification of plasmid vehicles that allow one joined to a ColEl-ampicillin resistance plasmid having no Sall site, and to a ColEl-kanamycin resistance plasmid having no to clone and amplify potentially any DNA fragment produced BamI site.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Clone Ref V1-2
    A primer on cloning in E. coli Michael Nonet Department of Neuroscience Washington University Medical School St Louis, MO 63110 Draft 1.2.1 Nov. 10, 2019 Things to add: gel electrophoresis methods basic bacteriology methods Index Overview E. coli vectors! 6 Types of E. coli vectors! 6 Components of typical plasmid vectors! 6 Origin of replication! 6 Antibiotic resistance genes! 7 Master Cloning Sites! 7 LacZ"! 7 ccdB ! 8 Design of DNA constructs! 9 Choice of vector! 9 Source of insert! 9 Plasmids! 9 Genomic or cDNA! 9 Synthetic DNA! 10 Overview of different approaches to creating clones! 10 Restriction enzyme based cloning! 10 Single vs. double cut method! 11 Blunt vs “sticky” restriction sites! 11 Typical methodology for restriction enzyme cloning! 11 Golden Gate style cloning! 12 Typical methodology for Golden Gate cloning! 12 Gateway cloning! 13 Typical methodology for Gateway cloning! 14 Gibson assembly cloning! 15 Typical procedure for Gibson assembly! 15 Site directed mutagenesis! 16 PCR overlap approach! 16 DpnI mediated site directed mutagenesis! 16 Typical procedure for site directed mutagenesis! 17 Detailed methodology for all five methods Restriction enzyme cloning! 18 Designing the cloning strategy ! 18 Determining which vector to use! 18 Designing the insert fragment! 19 Designing primers! 19 Vector preparation! 19 Insert preparation! 19 Detailed protocol! 20 Step 1: Design oligonucleotides to amplify the product of interest! 20 Step 2: PCR amplification of insert DNA! 20 Step 3: Clean-up purification of PCR product! 21 Step 4: Digestion of products! 21 Step 5: Gel purification of products! 22 Step 6: Ligation! 22 Step 7: Transformation of E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cloning Guide the First Step Towards a Succesful Igem Project Igem Bonn NRP-UEA Igem
    The Cloning Guide The first step towards a succesful iGEM Project iGEM Bonn NRP-UEA iGEM iGEM Manchester-Graz iGEM Evry iGEM Vanderbilt iGEM Minnesota Carnegie Mellon iGEM iGEM Sydney UIUC iGEM iGEM York iGEM Toulouse iGEM Pasteur UCLA iGEM iGEM Stockholm Preface The cloning guide which is lying before you or on your desktop is a document brought to you by iGEM TU Eindhoven in collaboration with numerous iGEM (International Genetically Engi- neered Machine) teams during iGEM 2015. An important part in the iGEM competition is the collabration of your own team with other teams. These collaborations are fully in line with the dedications of the iGEM Foundation on education and competition, the advancement of syn- thetic biology, and the development of an open community and collaboration. Collaborations between groups of (undergrad and overgrad) students can lead to nice products, as we have tried to provide one for you in 2015. In order to compile a cloning guide, several iGEM teams from all over the world have been con- tacted to cooperate on this. Finally fifiteen teams contributed in a fantastic way and a cloning guide consisting of the basics about nine different cloning methods and experiences of teams working with them has been realized. Without the help of all collaborating teams this guide could never have been realized, so we will thank all teams in advance. This guide may be of great help when new iGEM teams (edition 2016 and later) are at the point of designing their project. How to assemble the construct for you project, is an important choice which is possibly somewhat easier to make after reading this guide.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the Restriction Enzymes Wil A
    Published online 18 October 2013 Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, Vol. 42, No. 1 3–19 doi:10.1093/nar/gkt990 NAR Breakthrough Article SURVEY AND SUMMARY Highlights of the DNA cutters: a short history of the restriction enzymes Wil A. M. Loenen1,*, David T. F. Dryden2,*, Elisabeth A. Raleigh3,*, Geoffrey G. Wilson3,* and Noreen E. Murrayy 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, 2EaStChemSchool of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, Scotland, UK and 3New England Biolabs, Inc., 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA 01938, USA Received August 14, 2013; Revised September 24, 2013; Accepted October 2, 2013 ABSTRACT Type II REases represent the largest group of characterized enzymes owing to their usefulness as tools for recombinant In the early 1950’s, ‘host-controlled variation in DNA technology, and they have been studied extensively. bacterial viruses’ was reported as a non-hereditary Over 300 Type II REases, with >200 different sequence- phenomenon: one cycle of viral growth on certain specificities, are commercially available. Far fewer Type I, bacterial hosts affected the ability of progeny virus III and IV enzymes have been characterized, but putative to grow on other hosts by either restricting or examples are being identified daily through bioinformatic enlarging their host range. Unlike mutation, this analysis of sequenced genomes (Table 1). change was reversible, and one cycle of growth in Here we present a non-specialists perspective on import- the previous host returned the virus to its original ant events in the discovery and understanding of REases. form. These simple observations heralded the dis- Studies of these enzymes have generated a wealth of covery of the endonuclease and methyltransferase information regarding DNA–protein interactions and catalysis, protein family relationships, control of restric- activities of what are now termed Type I, II, III and tion activity and plasticity of protein domains, as well IV DNA restriction-modification systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Promiscuous Restriction Is a Cellular Defense Strategy That Confers Fitness
    Promiscuous restriction is a cellular defense strategy PNAS PLUS that confers fitness advantage to bacteria Kommireddy Vasua, Easa Nagamalleswaria, and Valakunja Nagarajaa,b,1 aDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India; and bJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, India Edited by Werner Arber, der Universitat Basel, Basel, Switzerland, and approved March 20, 2012 (received for review November 22, 2011) Most bacterial genomes harbor restriction–modification systems, ognition and cofactor utilization, whereas the cognate MTase is encoding a REase and its cognate MTase. On attack by a foreign very site-specific (14). In addition to its recognition sequence, DNA, the REase recognizes it as nonself and subjects it to restric- GGTACC, the enzyme binds and cleaves a number of noncanoni- tion. Should REases be highly specific for targeting the invading cal sequences (i.e., TGTACC, GTTACC, GATACC, GGAACC, foreign DNA? It is often considered to be the case. However, when GGTCCC, GGTATC, GGTACG, GGTACT), with the binding bacteria harboring a promiscuous or high-fidelity variant of the affinity ranging from 8 to 35 nM (14, 15). Accordingly, many of fi REase were challenged with bacteriophages, tness was maximal these sites are cleaved efficiently with kcat values varying from 0.06 − − under conditions of catalytic promiscuity. We also delineate pos- to 0.15 min 1 vs. 4.3 min 1 for canonical sites (15). The promis- sible mechanisms by which the REase recognizes the chromosome cuous activity of the enzyme is directed by a number of cofactors. as self at the noncanonical sites, thereby preventing lethal dsDNA In the presence of the physiological levels of Mg2+, the most breaks.
    [Show full text]
  • NEB Golden Gate Assembly Kit (Bsai-Hfv2) E1601 Manual
    INSTRUCTION MANUAL NEB® Golden Gate Assembly Kit (BsaI-HF®v2) NEB #E1601S/L 20/100 reactions Version 2.0_2/20 Table of Contents Golden Gate Assembly Overview ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 pGGAselect Destination Plasmid Description ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Insert Considerations ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Golden Gate Assembly Transformation and Plating Protocols ................................................................................................................... 5 Screening Protocols ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Golden Gate Assembly Tips ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Specifications ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Versatile Framework for Golden Gate Assembly Andreas I
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/140095; this version posted May 19, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Mobius Assembly: a versatile framework for Golden Gate assembly Andreas I. Andreou1,* and Naomi Nakayama1,* SynthSys Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, Centre for Science at Extreme Condition, and Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences 1: School of Biological Sciences, Max Born Crescent, Kings Buildings, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK *: Co-corresponding authors. [email protected]; [email protected] Mobius Assembly mUAV Α,Β,Γ,Δ Α,Β,Γ,Δ Abstract: Golden Gate Assembly is a powerful synthetic biology tool, which utilizes Type IIS enzymes for unidirectional assembly of multiple DNA fragments. The simplicity of its DNA assembly and the exchangeability of standard parts greatly facilitate the generation of combinatorial assembly libraries. Currently there are two popular Golden Gate Assembly frameworks that allow multigene augmentation (MoClo and Golden Braid); they render either high cloning capacity or vector toolkit simplicity. We have developed a new Golden Gate Assembly framework called Mobius Assembly, which combines vector toolkit simplicity with high cloning capacity. Mobius Assembly is based on a two-level approach and embraces the standard overhangs defined by MoClo and Golden Braid to confer exchangeability, but with reduced domestication requirement. Furthermore, we have implemented drop-out cassettes encoding chromogenic proteins for visible cloning screening.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study on the Recovery of Ecori Endonuclease from Two Different Genetically Modified Strains of Escherichia Coli
    Turk J Chem 25 (2001) , 63 – 71. c TUB¨ ITAK˙ A Comparative Study on the Recovery of EcoRI Endonuclease from Two Different Genetically Modified Strains of Escherichia coli Candan TAMERLER,Z.∗ Ilsen˙ ONSAN,¨ Bet¨ul KIRDAR Department of Chemical Engineering, Bo˘gazi¸ci University, 80815 Bebek, Istanbul˙ - TURKEY Received 21.07.1999 A laboratory scale procedure developed for the purification of EcoRI restriction endonuclease was applied to two different Escherichia coli strains, E. coli 294 and E. coli M5248, which are genetically modified to overproduce the enzyme. The purification method consisted of three successive chromato- graphic steps including phosphocellulose and hydroxyapatite columns and further fractionation in a second phosphocellulose column. It was shown that the second phosphocellulose separation can be omit- ted in the case of E. coli 294. Quality control tests indicated enzyme preparations free of contaminants and endo- or exo-nucleases. The yields obtained at the final stage of the purification were 1.3x105 U/g cells for E. coli M5248 and 3.3x106 U/g cells for E. coli 294. Key Words: EcoRI endonuclease, recombinant E. coli, purification, enzyme recovery Introduction Restriction enzymes have extensive applications in recombinant DNA technology. They are used in the preparation of recombinant molecules, and they provide an attractive system for the analysis of sequence specific DNA-protein interactions1. Escherichia coli RI (EcoRI) endonuclease is a well-known restriction enzyme that recognizes the symmetrical hexanucleotide sequence GAATTC on duplex DNA and cleaves each strand between G and A residues2. Physical and catalytic properties of EcoRI restriction endonuclease have been extensively studied by several groups and different purification protocols have been described1−9.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloning the DNA
    Making the Libraries Cloning the DNA he cells have been cultured, the each strand: 2 I A as a cloning vector. that is. as a medium chromosomes isolated and sorted. capable of accommodating foreign DNA seg- T Now can begin the final act in the ments for replication. Charon 21A is a modi- making of a library—that of multiplying the DNA in the sorted chromosomes by a factor DNA molecule is about 42,000 base pairs of more than a million. Some tricks of re- long, terminates with short stretches of combinant DNA technology make such great single-stranded DNA, and includes a single amplification possible, and the magicians EcoRI is produced by certain strains of the EcoRI cleavage site.) The DNA molecules who perform these tricks are lowly but ac- bacterium Escherichia coli as a defense extracted from the phages are cut by EcoRI commodating bacteria and viruses. against infection by the DNA of bacterio- into two "arms.” The cut ends of these arms Briefly, four steps are involved in cloning phages. The enzyme severs the viral DNA are then stripped of- a phosphate group (for a the DNA: preparation of DNA fragments and thus prevents its propagation in the reason to be explained later) by treatment from the sorted chromosomes and from bacterium. (To avoid self-destruction, the with the enzyme alkaline phosphatase. bacterial viruses (bacteriophages, or simply bacterium also produces another enzyme The next step is fairly simple, at least in phages); formation of recombinant DNA that modifies its own DNA so that it cannot theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Substrate-Assisted Catalysis in the Cleavage of DNA by the Ecori and Ecorv Restriction Enzymes
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, pp. 8499-8503, September 1993 Biochemistry Substrate-assisted catalysis in the cleavage of DNA by the EcoRI and EcoRV restriction enzymes (acid base catalysis/mechanism of deavage/nuclease/chemicafly modiffed oligodeoxynucleotide/H-phosphonate) ALBERT JELTSCH, JURGEN ALVES, HEINER WOLFES, GUNTER MAASS, AND ALFRED PINGOUD* Zentrum Biochemie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Konstanty-Gutschow-Strasse 8, 30623 Hannover, Germany Communicated by Thomas R. Cech, June 14, 1993 ABSTRACT The crystal structure analyses of the EcoRI- stereochemistry of their catalysis make it likely that these DNA and EcoRV-DNA complexes do not provide clear sug- enzymes cleave DNA by a similar mechanism that involves gestions as to which amino acid residues are responsible for the an attack of an activated water molecule in-line with the activation of water to carry out the DNA cleavage. Based on leaving 03' group. Recently, we published (11) a detailed molecular modeling, we have proposed recently that the at- proposal for the mechanism of DNA cleavage by EcoRI and tacking water molecule is activated by the negatively charged EcoRV based on structural data (Brookhaven data bank pro-Rp phosphoryl oxygen of the phosphate group 3' to the entries: 1RlE, 3RVE), molecular modeling, and results of scissile phosphodiester bond. We now present experimental site-directed mutagenesis experiments (ref. 12 and references evidence to support this proposal. (0) Oligodeoxynucleotide therein): Asp-91 and Glu-111 in EcoRI, Asp-74 and Asp-90 in substrates lacking this phosphate group in one strand are EcoRV, and the phosphate at which cleavage occurs were cleaved only in the other strand.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Cloning
    Now includes Recombinant Albumin Buffers Molecular Cloning TECHNICAL GUIDE be INSPIRED drive DISCOVERY stay GENUINE OVERVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Online Tools 4–5 Cloning Workflow Comparison 6 DNA Assembly Molecular Cloning Overview 6 Overview Molecular cloning refers to the process by which recombinant DNA molecules are 6 Product Selection produced and transformed into a host organism, where they are replicated. A molecular 7 Golden Gate Assembly Kits cloning reaction is usually comprised of two components: 7 Optimization Tips 8 Technical Tips for Optimizing 1. The DNA fragment of interest to be replicated. Golden Gate Assembly Reactions 2. A vector/plasmid backbone that contains all the components for replication in the host. 9 NEBuilder® HiFi DNA Assembly 10 Protocol/Optimization Tips ® DNA of interest, such as a gene, regulatory element(s), operon, etc., is prepared for cloning 10 Gibson Assembly by either excising it out of the source DNA using restriction enzymes, copying it using 11 Cloning & Mutagenesis PCR, or assembling it from individual oligonucleotides. At the same time, a plasmid vector 11 NEB PCR Cloning Kit is prepared in a linear form using restriction enzymes (REs) or Polymerase Chain Reaction 12 Q5® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (PCR). The plasmid is a small, circular piece of DNA that is replicated within the host and 12 Protocols/Optimization Tips exists separately from the host’s chromosomal or genomic DNA. By physically joining the 13–24 DNA Preparation DNA of interest to the plasmid vector through phosphodiester bonds, the DNA of interest 13 Nucleic Acid Purification becomes part of the new recombinant plasmid and is replicated by the host.
    [Show full text]
  • Restriction Enzymes in Microbiology, Biotechnology and Biochemistry Encuentro No
    19 Restriction Enzymes in Microbiology, Biotechnology and Biochemistry Encuentro No. 93, 19-48, 2012 Restriction Enzymes in Microbiology, Biotechnology and Biochemistry Geoffrey G. Wilson,* Hua Wang,** Daniel F. Heiter and*** Keith D. Lunnen**** Recibido: octubre 2012/ Aceptado: noviembre 2012 Since their discovery in the nineteen-seventies, a collection of simple enzymes termed Type II restriction endonucleases, made by microbes to ward off viral infections, have transformed molecular biology, spawned the multi-billion dollar Biotechnology industry, and yielded fundamental insights into the biochemistry of life, health and disease. In this article we describe how these enzymes were discovered, and we review their properties, organizations and genetics. We summarize current ideas about the mechanism underlying their remarkable ability to recognize and bind to specific base pair sequences in DNA, and we discuss why these ideas might not be correct. We conclude by proposing an alternative explanation for sequence-recognition that resolves certain inconsistencies and provides, in our view, a more satisfactory account of the mechanism. Keywords: DNA, specificity, recognition, discrimination, restriction, modification, endonuclease, methyltransferase, X-ray crystallography, major groove, minor groove, hydrogen bond, steric clash, electrostatic attraction, repulsion “The most far-reaching consequence of the emergence of the recombinant DNA technology has been the great strides made in understanding fundamental life processes and the ability to investigate problems that had previously been unapproachable. Emerging from myriad investigations has been the appreciation that nothing in the man-made world rivals the complexity and diversity of this * New England Biolabs, Inc., 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA 01938, USA. Tel: 978-380-7370; email: [email protected] 20 Restriction Enzymes in Microbiology, Biotechnology and Biochemistry Encuentro No.
    [Show full text]