DOCSLIB.ORG

Should We Clone Human Beings? Cloning As

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Should We Clone Human Beings? Cloning As Journal ofMedical Ethics 1999;25:87-95 J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.25.2.87 on 1 April 1999. Downloaded from Should we clone human beings? Cloning as a source of tissue for transplantation Julian Savulescu The Murdoch Institute, Royal Children 's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Abstract 3. It violates a person's right to genetic individu- The most publiclyjustifiable application ofhuman ality (whatever that is-identical twins cannot cloning, ifthere is one at all, is to provide have such a right). self-compatible cells or tissuesfor medical use, 4. It allows eugenic selection. especially transplantation. Some have argued that 5. It uses people as a means. this raises no new ethical issues above those raised by 6. Clones are worse off in terms of wellbeing, anyform ofembryo' experimentation. I argue that especially psychological wellbeing. this research is less morally problematic than other 7. There are safety concerns, especially an embryo research. Indeed, it is not merely morally increased risk of serious genetic malformation, permissible but morally required that we employ cancer or shortened lifespan. cloning to produce embryos orfetuses for the sake of providing cells, tissues or even organs for therapy, There are, however, a number of arguments in followed by abortion of the embryo orfetus. favour of human reproductive cloning. These (7ournal ofMedical Ethics 1999;25:87-95) include: Keywords: Cloning; transplantation; autonomy; embry- copyright. onic stem cells; fetal tissue; embryo experimentation; abor- 1. General liberty justifications. tion; potential 2. Freedom to make personal reproductive choices. 3. Freedom of scientific enquiry. Introduction 4. Achieving a sense of immortality. When news broke in 1997 that Ian Wilmut and his 5. Eugenic selection (with or without gene http://jme.bmj.com/ colleagues had successfully cloned an adult sheep, therapy/enhancement). there was an ill-informed wave of public, profes- 6. Social - sional and bureaucratic fear and rejection of the utility cloning socially important new technique. Almost universally, human clon- people. ing was condemned."4 Germany, Denmark and 7. Treatment of infertility (with or without gene Spain have legislation banning cloning; Norway, therapy/enhancement). Slovakia, Sweden and Switzerland have legislation 8. Replacement of a loved dead relative (with or implicitly banning cloning.7 Some states in without gene therapy/enhancement). on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected Australia, such as Victoria, ban cloning. There are 9. "Insurance" - freeze a split embryo in case two bills before congress in the US which would something happens to the first: as a source of comprehensively ban it.89 There is no explicit or tissue or as replacement for the first. implicit ban on cloning in England, Greece, 10. Source of human cells or tissue. Ireland or the Netherlands, though in England the 11. Research into stem cell differentiation to Human Embryology and Fertilisation Authority, provide an understanding of aging and which issues licences for the use of embryos, has oncogenesis. indicated that it would not issue any licence for 12. Cloning to prevent a genetic disease. research into "reproductive cloning". This is understood to be cloning to produce a fetus or live The arguments against cloning have been criti- birth. Research into cloning in the first 14 days of cally examined elsewhere and I will not repeat life might be possible in England.7 them here.''" Few people have given arguments There have been several arguments given in favour of it. Exceptions include arguments in against human reproductive cloning: favour of 7-12,12 with some commentators favouring only 10-1 1 13 14 or 1 1-12.' Justifications 1. It is liable to abuse. 10-12 (and possibly 7) all regard cloning as a way 2. It violates a person's right to individuality, of treating or avoiding disease. These have autonomy, selfhood, etc. emerged as arguably the strongest justifications 88 Should we clone human beings? Cloning as a source of tissue for transplantation J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.25.2.87 on 1 April 1999. Downloaded from for cloning. This paper examines 10 and to some person who is intended as the recipient of cell extent 1 1. therapy would provide a source of multipotential stem cells that are not rejected. These could also Human cloning as a source of cells or be vectors for gene therapy. A gene could be tissue inserted into a somatic cell from the patient, Cloning is the production of an identical or near- followed by selection, nuclear transfer and the identical genetic copy."6 Cloning can occur by fis- culture of the appropriate clonal population of sion or fusion. Fission is the division of a cell mass cells in vitro. These cells could then be returned to into two equal and identical parts, and the devel- the patient as a source of new tissue (for example opment of each into a separate but genetically bone marrow in the case ofleukaemia) or as tissue identical or near-identical individual. This occurs without genetic abnormality (in the case of inher- in nature as identical twins. ited genetic disease). The major experimental Cloning by fusion involves taking the nucleus issues which would need to be addressed are from one cell and transferring it to an egg which developing clonal stability during cell amplifica- has had its nucleus removed. Placing the nucleus tion and ensuring differentiation into the cell type in the egg reprogrammes the DNA in the nucleus needed.'3 It should be noted that this procedure to replicate the whole individual from which the does not necessarily involve the production of a nucleus was derived: nuclear transfer. It differs multicellular embryo, nor its implantation in vivo from fission in that the offspring has only one or artificially. (Indeed, cross-species cloning- genetic parent, whose genome is nearly identical fusing human cells with cow eggs-produces to that of the offspring. In fission, the offspring, embryos which will not develop into fetuses, let like the offspring of normal sexual reproduction, alone viable offspring.17) inherits half of its genetic material from each of A related procedure would produce totipotent two parents. Henceforth, by "cloning", I mean stem cells which could differentiate into multipo- cloning by fusion. tent cells of a particular line or function, or even Human cloning could be used in several ways to into a specific tissue. This is much closer to repro-copyright. produce cells, tissues or organs for the treatment ductive cloning. Embryonic stem cells from mice of human disease. have been directed to differentiate into vascular endothelium, myocardial and skeletal tissue, hae- mopoietic precursors and neurons.'8 However, it HUMAN CLONING AS A SOURCE OF MULTIPOTENT is not known whether the differentiation ofhuman STEM CELLS In this paper I will differentiate between totipotent totipotent stem cells can be controlled in vitro.http://jme.bmj.com/ and multipotent stem cells. Stem cells are cells Unlike the previous application, the production of which are early in developmental lineage and have organs could involve reproductive cloning (the the ability to differentiate into several different production of a totipotent cell which forms a blas- mature cell types. Totipotent stem cells are very tomere), but then differentiates into a tissue after immature stem cells with the potential to develop some days. Initially, however, all early embryonic into any ofthe mature cell types in the adult (liver, cells are identical. Producing totipotent stem cells lung, skin, blood, etc). Multipotential stem cells in this way is equivalent to the creation of an early on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected are more mature stem cells with the potential to embryo. develop into different mature forms of a particular for bone marrow stem cells PRODUCTION OF EMBRYO/FETUS/CHILD/ADULT AS A cell lineage, example, SOURCE OF TISSUE can form either white or red blood cells, but they An embryo, fetus, child or adult could be cannot form liver cells. produced by cloning, and solid organs or Multipotential stem cells can be used as differentiated tissue could be extracted from it. a. a vector for gene therapy. b. cells for transplantation, especially in bone Cloning as source of organs, tissue and marrow. cells for transplantation THE NEED FOR MORE ORGANS AND TISSUES Attempts have been made to use embryonic stem Jeffrey Platts reports: "So great is the demand that cells from other animals as vectors for gene as few as 5% of the organs needed in the United therapy and as universal transplantation cells in States ever become available".'9 According to humans. Problems include limited differentiation David K C Cooper, this is getting worse: "The and rejection. Somatic cells are differentiated cells discrepancy between the number of potential of the body, and not sex cells which give rise to recipients and donor organs is increasing by sperm and eggs. Cloning of somatic cells from a approximately 10-15% annually"."2 Increasing Savulescu 89 J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.25.2.87 on 1 April 1999. Downloaded from procurement of cadaveric organs may not be the in remission in leukaemia before use for reconsti- solution. Anthony Dorling and colleagues write: tution during relapse. "A study from Seattle, USA, in 1992 identified an Lucas II In this version of the example, the drug annual maximum ofonly 7,000 brain dead donors causes Lucas's healthy skin cells to turn into in the USA. Assuming 100% consent and healthy bone marrow stem cells. There is no suitability, these 14,000 potential kidney grafts relevant moral difference between Lucas I and II. would still not match the numbers of new patients We should develop such drugs and doctors would commencing dialysis each year. The clear implica- be negligent if they did not use them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2006 Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals The Humane Society of the United States Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, and the Other Genetics and Genomics Commons Recommended Citation The Humane Society of the United States, "Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals" (2006). IMPACTS ON FARM ANIMALS. 21. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/hsus_reps_impacts_on_animals/21 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Farm Animal Welfare • The HSUS 2100 L St., N.W. • Washington, DC 20037 • HSUS.org 202-452-1100 • F: 301-258-3081 • FarmAnimalWelfare.org An HSUS Report: Welfare Issues with Genetic Engineering and Cloning of Farm Animals Abstract Developments in biotechnology have raised new concerns about animal welfare, as farm animals now have their genomes modified (genetically engineered) or copied (cloned) to propagate certain traits useful to agribusiness, such as meat yield or feed conversion. These animals suffer from unusually high rates of birth defects, disabili- ties, and premature death. Genetically engineering farm animals for greater bone strength or reduced pain reception, for example, may result in improved well-being, yet the broad use of this technology often causes increased suffering. The limited success of gene insertion techniques can result in genes failing to reach target cells and finishing in cells of unintended organs, and abnormally developed embryos may die in utero, be infertile, or born with development defects, attributable in part to insertional problems.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Marijo G
    CURRICULUM VITAE Marijo G. Kent–First, B.A, M.S, Ph.D. CURRENT CORRESPONDING ADDRESS: BIRTH PLACE Bainbridge, GA, USA 3832 McFarlane Drive Tallahassee, FL 32303 Phone: NATIONALITY American/USA *Cell: 662-341-5243 (cell) E-mail: [email protected] Email: [email protected]+ PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS: -Training of students in Basic Sciences, Anatomy, Physiology and Genetics, Veterinary and Human Medicine and Pharmacy -Maintain animals carrying rare genetic mutation(s) for use in undergraduate research projects. -Research Focus: Reproductive genetics; embryogenesis/ oxidative stress induced genomic instability and tumorigenesis - Commercial Focus: Development of novel assays and tools for cancer diagnostics. - Breed, train & show horses across multiple disciplines Philosophy: Excellence in teaching and research is best achieved through active student/mentor relationships! “The most inspirational pioneers in science are often described as being passionate about their work with a little bit of eccentricity thrown in for good measure --- Science is fun and the process of learning should be an exciting adventure for both professor and student”! EDUCATION/DEGREES/CERTIFICATIONS POST-DOCTORAL: 2014-present Certification for Online Education and Teaching at Jackson State University Jackson State University Jackson, MS. (Ms. Tamika Morehead) 1990 - 1991 Reproductive Genetics Consultant- Clinical Embryology Bourn Hall Infertility Clinic, Bourn, Cambridge, UK (Prof. R.G. Edwards) Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and sex selection in human embryos resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF) 1988 - 1990 Genetic Consultant - American Breeders Service Deforest, WI (Dr. R. Walton and Dr. J. Sullivan) Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis; Sex selection in bovine 1988 -1990 Associate Scientist -University of WI, Madison Dept. of Meat and Animal Science (Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Stem Cells Cloning Prons & Cons
    & Trans g ge in n n e s o l i s C Cloning and Transgenesis Kalodimou, Clon Transgen 2014, 3:3 ISSN: 2168-9849 DOI: 10.4172/2168-9849.1000127 Short Communication Open Access Stem Cells Cloning Prons & Cons Vasiliki E Kalodimou* Research and Regenerative Medicine Department, IASO Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece *Corresponding author: Vasiliki E Kalodimou, Head of Flow Cytometry-Research and Regenerative Medicine Department, IASO Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece, Tel: 0030-210-618-5; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: May 16, 2014; Acc date: Jun 30, 2014; Pub date: July 2, 2014 Copyright: © 2014 Kalodimou VE. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Stem Cell Cloning the target cell. In principle, this may be dangerous, because the gene therapy vector can potentially modify the activity of neighboring genes Over the last several decades, the ideas of both stem cell research (positively or negatively) in close proximity to the insertion site or and cloning have received significantly more attention than ever even inactivate host genes by integrating into them [6]. These before; currently there are 23 open/completed clinical trials, together phenomena may contribute to the malignant transformation of the with a great deal of controversy. This new advances in medical targeted cells, ultimately resulting in cancer. Another major limitation technology had provide scientific with a new view of potential to help of using adult stem cells is that it is relatively difficult to maintain the people suffering from various diseases as well as to help them recover stem cell state during ex vivo manipulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cloning: Must We Sacrifice Medical Research in the Name of a Total Ban?
    S. HRG. 107–812 HUMAN CLONING: MUST WE SACRIFICE MEDICAL RESEARCH IN THE NAME OF A TOTAL BAN? HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 5, 2002 Serial No. J–107–55 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 83–684 PDF WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Feb 1 2002 09:13 Jan 16, 2003 Jkt 083684 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\HEARINGS\83684.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware STROM THURMOND, South Carolina HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JON KYL, Arizona CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York MIKE DEWINE, Ohio RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama MARIA CANTWELL, Washington SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN EDWARDS, North Carolina MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BRUCE A. COHEN, Majority Chief Counsel and Staff Director SHARON PROST, Minority Chief Counsel MAKAN DELRAHIM, Minority Staff Director (II) VerDate Feb 1 2002 09:13 Jan 16, 2003 Jkt 083684 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\HEARINGS\83684.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Brownback, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloning: Adult Vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work Spring 5-2001 Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed Rebecca Ruth Frazor University of Tennessee-Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Frazor, Rebecca Ruth, "Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Techniques Employed" (2001). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/459 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: Getec eCA f?- f(CAZOr College: AQn eMi:hA rv Department: A1 (met I SCi!A1w -J Faculty Mentor: F. N-S ChV\C ¥: PROJECT TITLE: C10l/1\(}q : Adult \[) ' fmmrVVl l0 C l, (( ~ ~rd the. ~ Qr\L\A<; Icchn \ quc ~ Emplo\( f d I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commens rate with rs level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ;. ./-1 Faculty Mentor Date: _-+-'""-+----L-___ Comments (Optional): Cloning: Adult vs. Embryonic Cells and Various Techniques Employed Rebecca R. Frazor Mentor: F. Neal Schrick Senior Honors Project May 2001 Abstract The cloning of amphibians and mainly mammals is discussed focusing on somatic cell usage. Significant progress has been made in recent years and this is outlined with an emphasis on techniques and their differences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Interspecific Oocytes on Demethylation of Sperm DNA
    The effect of interspecific oocytes on demethylation of sperm DNA Nathalie Beaujean*†‡, Jane E. Taylor*, Michelle McGarry*, John O. Gardner*, Ian Wilmut*, Pasqualino Loi§, Grazyna Ptak§, Cesare Galli¶, Giovanna Lazzari¶, Adrian Birdʈ, Lorraine E. Young**††, and Richard R. Meehan†‡‡ *Division of Gene Expression and Development, Roslin Institute, Roslin EH25 9PS, United Kingdom; †Department of Biomedical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, United Kingdom; §Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Teramo University, Teramo 64100, Italy; ¶Laboratorio di Tecnologie della Riproduzione, Istituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani, CIZ srl, Via Porcellasco 7͞f, 26100 Cremona, Italy; ʈWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, United Kingdom; **Institute of Genetics and Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom; and ‡‡Human Genome Unit, Medical Research Council, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 9XU, United Kingdom Edited by Rudolf Jaenisch, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, and approved April 7, 2004 (received for review February 2, 2004) In contrast to mice, in sheep no genome-wide demethylation of the Materials and Methods paternal genome occurs within the first postfertilization cell cycle. All animal procedures were under strict accordance with U.K. This difference could be due either to an absence of a sheep Home Office regulations and within a project license issued demethylase activity that is present in mouse ooplasm or to an under the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986. increased protection of methylated cytosine residues in sheep sperm.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Cloning and Refactoring of a Silent Lipopeptide Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Yields the Antibiotic Taromycin A
    Direct cloning and refactoring of a silent lipopeptide biosynthetic gene cluster yields the antibiotic taromycin A Kazuya Yamanakaa,b, Kirk A. Reynoldsa,c, Roland D. Kerstena, Katherine S. Ryana,d, David J. Gonzaleze, Victor Nizete,f, Pieter C. Dorresteina,c,f, and Bradley S. Moorea,f,1 aScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; bYokohama Research Center, JNC Corporation, Yokohama 236-8605, Japan; cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; dDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V62 1Z4; and Departments of ePediatrics and fSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 Edited by Jerrold Meinwald, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and approved December 23, 2013 (received for review October 23, 2013) Recent developments in next-generation sequencing technologies genes (9, 10). Synthetic biology approaches also can be used to have brought recognition of microbial genomes as a rich resource refactor orphan gene clusters by optimizing promoters, tran- for novel natural product discovery. However, owing to the scar- scriptional regulation, ribosome-binding sites, and even codon city of efficient procedures to connect genes to molecules, only use (11). Examples of successful regulatory gene manipulation to a small fraction of secondary metabolomes have been investigated elicit the production of new natural products from silent bio- to date. Transformation-associated recombination (TAR) cloning synthetic gene clusters in WT strains have been reported in takes advantage of the natural in vivo homologous recombination bacteria and fungi (12, 13); however, this approach requires the of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to directly capture large genomic loci.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolly the Sheep – the First Cloned Adult Animal
    DOLLY THE SHEEP – THE FIRST CLONED ADULT ANIMAL NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR IMPROVING LIVESTOCK From Squidonius via Wikimedia Commons In 1996, University of Edinburgh scientists celebrated the birth of Dolly the Sheep, the first mammal to be cloned using SCNT cloning is the only technology adult somatic cells. The Edinburgh team’s success followed available that enables generation of 99.8% its improvements to the single cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) genetically identical offspring from selected technique used in the cloning process. individuals of adult animals (including sterilized animals). As such, it is being Dolly became a scientific icon recognised worldwide and exploited as an efficient multiplication tool SCNT technology has spread around the world and has been to support specific breeding strategies of used to clone multiple farm animals. farm animals with exceptionally high genetic The cloning of livestock enables growing large quantities of value. the most productive, disease resistant animals, thus providing more food and other animal products. Sir Ian Wilmut (Inaugural Director of MRC Centre for Regeneration and Professor at CMVM, UoE) and colleagues worked on methods to create genetically improved livestock by manipulation of stem cells using nuclear transfer. Their research optimised interactions between the donor nucleus and the recipient cytoplasm at the time of fusion and during the first cell cycle. Nuclear donor cells were held in mitosis before being released and used as they were expected to be passing through G1 phase. CLONING IN COMMERCE, CONSERVATION OF AGRICULTURE AND PRESERVATION ANIMAL BREEDS OF LIVESTOCK DIVERSITY Cloning has been used to conserve several animal breeds in the recent past.
    [Show full text]
  • Multipotent Cell Types in Primary Fibroblast Cell Lines Used to Clone Pigs Using Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Sharon J
    & Trans Harrison et al., Clon Transgen 2015, 4:2 g ge in n n e DOI: 10.4172/2168-9849.1000136 s o l i s C Cloning & Transgenesis ISSN: 2168-9849 Research Article Open Access Multipotent Cell Types in Primary Fibroblast Cell Lines Used to Clone Pigs using Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Sharon J. Harrison, Luke F.S. Beebe, Ivan Vassiliev, Stephen M. McIlfatrick and Mark B. Nottle* Reproductive Biotechnology Group, Centre for Stem Cell Research, Robinson Institute School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia Abstract We have previously demonstrated that the use of porcine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from the bone marrow can increase the proportion of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos that develop to the blastocyst stage compared with adult fibroblasts obtained from the same animal. The aim of the present study was to determine if MSCs are also present in primary cultures of adult fibroblasts which are commonly used for cloning live animals. To do this we chose a primary culture of adult fibroblasts that we had previously used to clone pigs. Single cell clones were isolated using low-density plating. After seven days of culture 63% of colonies displayed typical fibroblast morphology, while the remainder appeared cobblestone-like in appearance. Two of the 57 clones that displayed fibroblast morphology differentiated into adipocytes but not chondrocytes or osteocytes (uni-potent clones). Three of the 33 cobblestone-like clones differentiated into chondrocytes only, while 3 differentiated into adipocytes and chondrocytes but not osteocytes (bi-potent clones). One of the bi-potent cobblestone-like clones was then used for SCNT and in vitro development compared with a fibroblast-like clone which did not differentiate.
    [Show full text]
  • How They Cloned a Sheep
    How They Cloned A Sheep How They Cloned A Sheep This text is provided courtesy of the American Museum of Natural History. How they cloned a sheep 1. Scientists took udder cells from Dolly's DNA mother. They let the cells multiply and then they stopped the process when they had divided enough. 2. They took an egg cell from a different sheep and removed the nucleus. 3. They put one udder cell next to the egg cell without a nucleus and joined them using electricity. The egg cell now contained all the udder cell's DNA. 4.The egg cell divided until it developed into an embryo. An embryo is the early stage of an animal before it has been born or hatched. This embryo was placed inside a third sheep. Five months later, this sheep gave birth to Dolly. ReadWorks.org · © 2015 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved. How They Cloned A Sheep - Comprehension Questions Answer Key 1. What did scientists remove from the egg cell of a sheep? A. the nucleus B. the embryo C. DNA D. udder cells 2. This passage describes the sequence of events involved in cloning a sheep. What happened after the scientists took udder cells and an egg cell from different sheep? A. The egg cell was joined to an udder cell using electricity. B. The embryo was placed inside another sheep. C. Scientists took udder cells from Dolly's DNA mother. D. The egg cell divided until it formed an embryo. 3. As part of the process of cloning a sheep, scientists placed the embryo inside a sheep, which eventually gave birth to Dolly.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cloning: Fact Or Fiction
    LRN: 05D1721 745. 6239 - i/3 Human Cloning: Fact or Fiction An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor's Degree by Krisha S. Murthy Christopher Tereshko Daniel J. Caloia Amy Borges Date: May 3, 2005 Professor Thomas A. Shannon, Major Advisor 1 Abstract Human Cloning: Fact or Fiction is an evaluation of the portrayal of cloning in the media. Cloning technology has not only made a huge impact in the scientific community, but it has also affected the general community. Cloning is often misrepresented in literature and films, however, giving the public only a partial picture of the different aspects of cloning, such as religion, ethics, and government. Informing them of the facts of cloning technology will form better educated opinions. 2 Section 1 - Introduction In 1997, Dolly was created and cloning became a household word. Before this event, cloning was just a possibility, a fictional thread to weave together tales of science fiction. Once Dolly was born, however, there could be serious talk of cloning and these stories that once seemed like fiction could be considered reality. However, can stories like this really be considered reality? In most fictional books and movies, cloning starts as an amazing scientific breakthrough. However, one or more characters take advantage of the technology and attempt to create, for instance, the perfect army, or a Hitler for the current generation. It could even be as innocent as creating clones to help do a particular tedious task, but even then they get out of hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloning of Gene Coding Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Using Puc18 Vector
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2015, 5(3):52-57 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU Cloning of gene coding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase using puc18 vector Manoj Kumar Dooda, Akhilesh Kushwaha *, Aquib Hasan and Manish Kushwaha Institute of Transgene Life Sciences, Lucknow (U.P), India _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The term recombinant DNA technology, DNA cloning, molecular cloning, or gene cloning all refers to the same process. Gene cloning is a set of experimental methods in molecular biology and useful in many areas of research and for biomedical applications. It is the production of exact copies (clones) of a particular gene or DNA sequence using genetic engineering techniques. cDNA is synthesized by using template RNA isolated from blood sample (human). GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) is one of the most commonly used housekeeping genes used in comparisons of gene expression data. Amplify the gene (GAPDH) using primer forward and reverse with the sequence of 5’-TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAA-3’ and 5’-TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTGGGCCAT- 3’.pUC18 high copy cloning vector for replication in E. coli, suitable for “blue-white screening” technique and cleaved with the help of SmaI restriction enzyme. Modern cloning vectors include selectable markers (most frequently antibiotic resistant marker) that allow only cells in which the vector but necessarily the insert has been transfected to grow. Additionally the cloning vectors may contain color selection markers which provide blue/white screening (i.e. alpha complementation) on X- Gal and IPTG containing medium. Keywords: RNA isolation; TRIzol method; Gene cloning; Blue/white screening; Agarose gel electrophoresis.
    [Show full text]