DOCSLIB.ORG

North Country National Scenic Trail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Country National Scenic Trail North Country National Scenic Trail North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York National Park Service Draft Northeastern Minnesota Route Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior And Environmental Assessment 2 Chapter 1 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................7 1.1 Purpose and Significance of the North Country National Scenic Trail......................................7 1.2 Purpose and Need for the Route Assessment.............................................................................8 1.3 Decision to be Made...................................................................................................................8 1.4 Scoping and Public Involvement................................................................................................9 1.5 Primary Issues and Concerns....................................................................................................10 1.6 Impact Topics Considered but not Analyzed in Detail ............................................................11 1.6.1 Environmental Justice .........................................................................................................11 1.6.2 Soundscapes ........................................................................................................................11 1.6.3 Prime or Unique Farmland ..................................................................................................12 1.6.4 Northeastern Minnesota Air Quality ...................................................................................12 1.7 Availability of planning record ................................................................................................12 Chapter 2 Alternatives..........................................................................................................................13 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................13 2.2 No Action Alternative ..............................................................................................................14 2.3 Preferred Alternative ................................................................................................................14 2.3.1 Preferred Alternative Part 1-Designate Existing Trails as the route of North Country National Scenic Trail.......................................................................................................................................14 2.3.1.1 Jay Cooke State Park through Duluth to Existing Superior Hiking Trail ........................15 2.3.1.2 Superior Hiking Trail .......................................................................................................15 2.3.1.3 Border Route Trail............................................................................................................16 2.3.1.4 Kekekabic Trail ................................................................................................................16 2.3.2 Preferred Alternative-Part 2- Designate Trail Corridor for Connection to Existing Segment in Chippewa National Forest ................................................................................................................16 2.4 Alternatives Considered but Rejected-Specific Routes............................................................17 2.4.1 Mesabi Trail Corridor..........................................................................................................18 2.4.2 Echo Lake Corridor .............................................................................................................18 2.4.3 Middle Route Corridor ........................................................................................................18 2.4.4 Vermillion Lake Corridor....................................................................................................18 2.4.5 McCarthy Beach State Park to Grand Rapids .........................................................................19 2.5 Alternatives Considered but not Evaluated ..............................................................................19 Preferred Alternative Map............................................................................................................21 Chapter 3 Affected Environment........................................................................................................23 3.1 Location and Description of Preferred Alternative Route Corridor.........................................23 3.2 County Overview......................................................................................................................23 3.2.1 Aitkin County ......................................................................................................................23 3.2.3 Carlton County ....................................................................................................................23 3.2.3 Cass County.........................................................................................................................24 3.2.4 Cook County........................................................................................................................24 3.2.5 Itasca County.......................................................................................................................24 3.2.6 Lake County ........................................................................................................................24 3.2.7 St. Louis County..................................................................................................................25 3.3 Northeastern Minnesota Land Resources.................................................................................25 3.3.1 Landscape............................................................................................................................25 3.3.2 Geology ...............................................................................................................................25 3.3.3 Soils .....................................................................................................................................26 3.4 Northeastern Minnesota Water Resources .................................................................................26 3.4.1 Lake Basins .........................................................................................................................27 3 3.4.2 Wetlands..............................................................................................................................27 3.4.3 Water Quality ......................................................................................................................28 3.5 Northeastern Minnesota Visual Resources.................................................................................28 3.6 Northeastern Minnesota Biological Resources ..........................................................................28 3.6.1 Wildlife................................................................................................................................28 3.6.2 Fisheries...............................................................................................................................29 3.6.3 Threatened and Endangered Species...................................................................................29 3.6.4 State Threatened and Endangered Species..........................................................................30 3.6.5 Critical Habitat ....................................................................................................................31 3.7 Northeastern Minnesota Cultural Resources............................................................................31 3.7.1 Historical Sites and Structures.............................................................................................32 3.7.2 Number of Known Historical Districts, Sites or Structures in Project Area- Listed by County ..........................................................................................................................................32 3.8 Northeastern Minnesota Community Resources......................................................................32 3.8.1 Communities and Businesses ..............................................................................................32 3.8.2 Tourism and Hiking.............................................................................................................33 3.9 Northeastern Minnesota Land Use and Ownership..................................................................33 3.9.1 Ceded Lands ........................................................................................................................33 3.9.2 Land Values.........................................................................................................................33 3.9.3 Ownership............................................................................................................................33 3.9.4 Land Use..............................................................................................................................33 3.10 Northeastern Minnesota Recreation Resources......................................................................34 3.10.1 State Parks, State Wayside Parks, State Forests..............................................................34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: an Inventory of Its State Park Maps
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Minnesota State Archives HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT An Inventory of Its State Park Maps OVERVIEW OF THE RECORDS Agency: Minnesota. Dept. of Highways. Series Title: State park maps, Dates: 1922. Abstract: Blueprint maps showing boundaries and facilities in state parks. Quantity: 22 items in oversize folder. Location: A3/ov4 Drawer 2 SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE RECORDS Blueprint maps showing boundaries and facilities in various state parks, with proposed expansions of the park's land area or the addition of facilities. Most show plot plans and give elevation information. The maps were drawn by the Highway Department on orders of Governor J. A. O. Preus for use in legislative deliberations regarding park budgets, according to information printed on the maps. RELATED MATERIALS Related materials: Later state park maps, created by the state Conservation Department, are found with that department's records. INDEX TERMS This collection is indexed under the following headings in the catalog of the Minnesota Historical Society. Researchers desiring materials about related topics, persons or places should search the catalog using these headings. Topics: Mapping. Parks--Minnesota--Maps. Parks--Minnesota--Finance. Types of Documents: Hghwy005.inv HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. State Park Maps, 1922. p. 2 Maps--Minnesota. Site plans--Minnesota. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Preferred Citation: [Indicate the cited item here]. Minnesota. Dept. of Highways. State park maps, 1922. Minnesota Historical Society. State Archives. See the Chicago Manual of Style for additional examples. Accession Information: Accession number(s): 991-52 Processing Information: PALS ID No.: 0900036077 RLIN ID No.: MNHV94-A228 ITEM LIST Note to Researchers: To request materials, please note the location and drawer number shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness T R I P P L a N N I N G G U I D E
    BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE AREA WILDERNESS T RIP P LANNING G UIDE Your BWCAW Adventure Starts Here… Share the Experience, Peter Nelson GREAT GLACIERS carved the physical Provincial Parks and is bordered on the What’s Inside… features of what is today known as west by Voyageurs National Park. The Page 2 . Planning your BWCAW Trip the Boundary Waters Canoe Area BWCAW contains over 1200 miles of Page 2 . Superior National Forest Wilderness (BWCAW) by scraping and canoe routes, 12 hiking trails and over Recreation Alternatives gouging rock. The glaciers left behind 2000 designated campsites. This area was Page 3 . Reservation & Permit Basics Page 4 . Leave No Trace rugged cliffs and crags, canyons, gentle set aside in 1926 to preserve its primitive Page 5 . BWCAW Rules and Regulations hills, towering rock formations, rocky character and made a part of the Page 6 – 7 . Smart and Safe Wilderness shores, sandy beaches and thousands National Wilderness Preservation System Travel Page 8-9 ����������� BWCAW Entry Points of lakes and streams, interspersed with in 1964 with subsequent legislation in Page 10 . The BWCAW Past and Present islands and surrounded by forest. 1978. Page 10 . The BWCAW Act The BWCAW is a unique area Wilderness offers freedom to those Page 11 . Fire in the Wilderness located in the northern third of the who wish to pursue an experience Page 12 – 13 . Protecting Your Natural Resources Superior National Forest in northeastern of expansive solitude, challenge and Page 14 . Special Uses Minnesota. Over 1 million acres in personal connection with nature. The Page 15 . Youth Activity Page size, it extends nearly 150 miles along BWCAW allows visitors to canoe, Page 16 .
    [Show full text]
  • Sandpiper Pipeline & Line 3 Replacement Projects With
    SANDPIPER PIPELINE & LINE 3 REPLACEMENT PROJECTS WITH ROUTE ALTERNATIVES (REGIONAL) Emerson C A N A D A â â â Noyes Saint â Joseph K i t t s o n Twsp 59 K i t t s o n Caribou â ST 171 â â ST C o u n tt y WMA Pembina St. North Saint Roseau â â Vincent Vincent â Clow Richardville MIINNESOTA Caribou Pohlitz Dieter Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Skull Twsp Northwest Twsp Twsp Roseau Lake WMA McKinley Roseau Roseau Lake WMA Twsp Twsp River WMA â âHumboldt â â âBathgate Jadis Twsp â â âLancaster Hill Soler Moose Roseau Spruce â Hampden Granville Poppleton Cannon Ross â Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp â Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Beaches Lake WMA Hamilton ST5 â ST5 â â â East Kittson Badger Twsp â North Red Hallock â â Malung â P e m b ii n a River Hallock Thompson Hazelton Percy Polonia Barto Skagen Stokes Stafford Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp C o u n tt y Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp Lake '10W Brâonson Lake B ronson State Park â R o s e a u Mickinock â Glasston R o s e a u Twsp â r South Red Greenbush e â C o u n t y v C o u n t y i River ââ R Twsp Norway Pelan â d Twsp WMA e Skane Tegner Jupiter Dewey Barnett Nereson Grimstad â â R Twsp Twsp Twsp Pelan Twsp Twsp Twsp Twsp âHalma Twsp Hereim Wannaska Twsp â â âKennedy â Nereson â â â â St.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemlock Ravine Scientific and Natural Area 1984 Resource Inventory
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Hemlock Ravine Scientific and Natural Area 1984 Resource Inventory Portions of SE 1/4, Section 3 Township 48, Range 16W Esko Quadrangle - L20a Carlton County Minnesota Prepared by The Scientific and Natural Area Program and The Minnesota Natural Heritage Program Division of Fish and Wildlife Minnesota Department of Natural Resources June 1984 Scientific and Natural Areas Scientific and Natural Areas serve: Education - elementary through high school groups use such areas as outdoor classrooms. Nature Observation - the public uses these areas to observe Minnesota's most unique or rare natural resources. Protection Functions - Minnesota's rarest species or most unique features are protected for the citizens of today and tomorro,,;·]. Recreation - the public uses such areas for informal, dispersed recreation 0 Resea~ch - colleges are able to establish long term research projects secure in knoT:!ing the area will not be influenced by other management activities. Genetic Storehouse - ?otentially valuable plants ,and animals are retained thereby ·offering potential for new medicines, resistance to plant diseases, and other unknown secrets. Currently there are 34 Scientific and Natural Areas protecting undisturbed remnants of Minnesota's plant communities and plant and animal species. These areas encompass maple basswood forests, virgin prairies, orchid bogs, heron rookeries, sand dunes, and virgin pine stands, as wel~ as many rare plant and animal species. o Y4 % mile I· I• , • I • I o 200m 400m 800m HEMLOCK RAVI ES A VICINITY o ~ % mile I.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation
    Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation MURP Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Urban and Regional Planning Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Tom Holmes Jake Knight Darin Newman Xinyi Wu May 20, 2016 Date of oral presentation: Approval date of final paper: May 6, 2016 May 20, 2016 Capstone Instructor: Dr. Greg Lindsey, Professor Photo credit: www.flickr.com/photos/zavitkovski/6266747939/ Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation Prepared for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Tom Holmes Jake Knight Darin Newman Xinyi Wu May 20, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Greg Lindsey Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Urban and Regional Planning Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails | MURP Capstone Paper Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Project Methodology 3 2. Project Context 5 2.1. Historical DNR Trail Surveys 5 2.2. Project Purpose 7 2.3. Project Scope 7 3. Counting Methods 9 3.1. Duration 9 3.2. Visits 10 3.3. Traffic 10 3.4. Case Study 1: Differentiating Duration, Visits, and Traffic on the Gateway State Trail 12 3.5. Recommendation: Traffic Counts 13 4. Considerations for Automated Traffic Counts 15 4.1 How to Implement Automated Traffic Counts 15 4.2. Case Study 2: Gateway and Brown’s Creek State Trail AADT 17 4.3. Seven Decisions for Program Design 20 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85
    1​ MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020​ 85.011​ CHAPTER 85​ DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION​ STATE PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES​ 85.06​ SCHOOLHOUSES IN CERTAIN STATE PARKS.​ 85.011​ CONFIRMATION OF CREATION AND​ 85.20​ VIOLATIONS OF RULES; LITTERING; PENALTIES.​ ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE PARKS, STATE​ 85.205​ RECEPTACLES FOR RECYCLING.​ RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.21​ STATE OPERATION OF PARK, MONUMENT,​ 85.0115​ NOTICE OF ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS.​ RECREATION AREA AND WAYSIDE FACILITIES;​ 85.012​ STATE PARKS.​ LICENSE NOT REQUIRED.​ 85.013​ STATE RECREATION AREAS AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.22​ STATE PARKS WORKING CAPITAL ACCOUNT.​ 85.014​ PRIOR LAWS NOT ALTERED; REVISOR'S DUTIES.​ 85.23​ COOPERATIVE LEASES OF AGRICULTURAL​ 85.0145​ ACQUIRING LAND FOR FACILITIES.​ LANDS.​ 85.0146​ CUYUNA COUNTRY STATE RECREATION AREA;​ 85.32​ STATE WATER TRAILS.​ CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL.​ 85.33​ ST. CROIX WILD RIVER AREA; LIMITATIONS ON​ STATE TRAILS​ POWER BOATING.​ 85.015​ STATE TRAILS.​ 85.34​ FORT SNELLING LEASE.​ 85.0155​ LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL.​ TRAIL PASSES​ 85.0156​ MISSISSIPPI WHITEWATER TRAIL.​ 85.40​ DEFINITIONS.​ 85.016​ BICYCLE TRAIL PROGRAM.​ 85.41​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI PASSES.​ 85.017​ TRAIL REGISTRY.​ 85.42​ USER FEE; VALIDITY.​ 85.018​ TRAIL USE; VEHICLES REGULATED, RESTRICTED.​ 85.43​ DISPOSITION OF RECEIPTS; PURPOSE.​ ADMINISTRATION​ 85.44​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI TRAIL GRANT-IN-AID​ 85.019​ LOCAL RECREATION GRANTS.​ PROGRAM.​ 85.021​ ACQUIRING LAND; MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL.​ 85.45​ PENALTIES.​ 85.04​ ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMPLOYEES.​ 85.46​ HORSE
    [Show full text]
  • Bud Heinselman and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, 1964–65 KEVIN PROESCHOLDT
    FIRST FIGHT Bud Heinselman and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, 1964–65 KEVIN PROESCHOLDT innesotan Miron L. “Bud” Heinselman worked swamp black spruce on peatlands. Heinselman’s doctoral Mhis entire career for the U.S. Forest Service as a for- dissertation centered on peatlands ecology in the basin of ester and ecologist. Through his extensive research, he be- the former glacial Lake Agassiz in Minnesota; the presti- came one of the nation’s foremost experts in the separate gious scientific journal, Ecological Monographs, published fields of peatlands, forest ecology, and fire ecology. Beyond these findings in 1963. He was a careful and meticulous those quiet scientific accomplishments, Heinselman also researcher, not one to overstate his findings.2 played a very public role in leading the citizen effort from By 1960 Heinselman was living in Grand Rapids, Min- 1976 to 1978 to pass the 1978 Boundary Waters Canoe Area nesota, continuing research for the Forest Service’s Lake Wilderness (BWCAW) Act through Congress, providing States Forest Experiment Station. He had always been new protections for the area.1 interested in conservation and had joined several non- But a dozen years earlier, Heinselman had cut his ad- profit organizations, including the Izaak Walton League vocacy teeth on another campaign to protect the million- of America (IWLA). He became active in the “Ikes,” was acre Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA), as it was then president of its Grand Rapids chapter in the early 1960s, known. From 1964 to 1965, largely out of the public view, and served on the IWLA Minnesota Division’s Wilderness he organized conservationists with enthusiasm and a clear Committee, chaired by his Grand Rapids friend Adolph T.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Savanna Portage State Park Hunt Areas
    SAVANNA PORTAGE STATE PARK SPECIAL HUNT INFORMATION JACOB Rat House SUMMER TRAILS Lake 65YOUTH AND REGUALR DEER HUNT Hiking RV Sanitation Station Savanna Portage Hiking Trail Recycle Station Areas closed to hunting Cutaway Lake Hiking/Mountain Biking Dumpster Hiking Club Rentals (boat, canoe) Boot Lake Private property are also closed to hunting, unless written permission is 2.4 mi. A/1 Intersections Dock 579th Ln. obtained from the landowner. Swimming Area FACILITIES Trailer Access 11 Park Office Carry-in Access Wolf Lake Public Telephone Wakefield WOLF1 Campground Lake GARNI Parking PORTA Camper Cabin Savanna Lake Firewood ($) CONDI Wolf Group Camp 1.1 mi. G1 Trail Shelter 2 Lake Walk-in/boat-in Campsite Continental Picnic Area Trail Backpack Campsite Savanna Portage Trail Lake Pl. Divide Lk. Rd. 6.3 mi. Picnic Shelter Remote Lake Forest Rd. Trail Restroom/Shower Trail 1.3 mi. Savanna Historic Site Schoolhouse Primitive Toilet 3 Overlook Drinking Water Old SITE G Playground 1.1 mi. Private Property Anderson 36 Road Trail 10 Lake Shumway Volleyball Court 0.9 mi. G Lake Trail 1.5 mi. Rd. Shumway 1.8 mi. loop 1 South L Spur SITE K 0.3 mi. 2.8 mi. Lake F D loop K Loon Lake E 0.5 mi. Loon Loon Spruce Remote Lake Trail Trail J FULL PARK OVERVIEW 1.1 mi. loop Lake 0.9 mi. C I SITE D Solitude Area 0.3 mi. Black Remote Lake 0.9 mi. Beaver Pond Trail 0.6 mi. loop O 0.9 mi. Logging Camp Trail loop A 1.3 mi.
    [Show full text]
  • Eaws--Comments Due on February 1,1995
    3 I Published by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board \ EQB Monitor January 2,1995 Volume 19, #14 Next issuddeadline: January 16IJanua1y 9 EAWS--COMMENTS DUE ON FEBRUARY 1,1995 Project tile: Valley Creek Road (Washington CSAH 16) Description: Valley Creek Road is proposed for reconstruction from Interlachen Parkway to 800 feet east of St. John Drive in Woodbury. The roadway is currently a 2-lane road with 8 foot paved shoulders west of Woodbury Drive and 2 foot gravel shoulders east of Woodbury Drive. Generally about 150 feet of right-of-way is available. The typical cross section for the preferred alternative consists of 2 lanes in each direction with right and left Nm lanes at major intersect~ons. A raised concrete median will separate east and west bound lanes. RGU: Washington County Contact person: Don Theisen, Deputy Director of Public Works, Washington County, 11660 Myeron Road N., Stillwater, MN 55082; 612-430-4300. < Project title: Tiller Corporation Mining, West Lakeland Township Description: The proposed project by Tiller Corporation (Barton Sand and Gravel) is to continue the operation and expand an existing sand and gravel mine. The operation will mine 150 acres of land over the next 25 years. The material excavated, sand and gravel, will be crushed and washed and used concrete and asphalt will be recycled to create a finished product. RGU: Washington County Contact person: Kathy Nordine, Land Use Specialist, Washington County, 14900 61st Street N., P.O. Box 3803, Stillwater, MN 55082-3803; 612-430-6715. Project title: Zimmerman Water System Improvements Description: The City of Zierman is proposing to construct a new city well, a water tower and a new sanitary sewer and water main that would extend about 1-112 miles west of town.
    [Show full text]
  • MN CWCS, Links to Other Plans
    Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Appendix C Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife Links to Other Plans (organized alphabetically by subsection) Appendix C. Links to other plans 1 Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife V09.28.2005 Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Agassiz Lowlands A. Other Plans/Efforts in Subsection Plan Page Composition Succession/ development Spatial Sites Agassiz Lowlands Subsection pp. ii, iii, 3- - Key changes in forest composition include - Ideally, a cover type has - Patches will be - Consult the Natural Heritage Database Forest Resource Management 4 to 3-9 more acres of jack pine (+5400 acres), white a balance of age classes to distributed in a during stand selection, and field visits, to Plan (SFRMP), Dec. 2002 pine (+988 acres), red pine (+1953 acres), provide a sustainable range of ages and identify known locations of rare species or upland tamarack (+615 acres), upland white range of wildlife habitat sizes characteristic plant communities of concern. cedar (+1510 acres), spruce/fir (+2500 acres), and forest products. One of the - Consult with the Regional Non-game and northern hardwoods (+619 acres) than the goal of this plan is to landscape. (p. 3- Specialist or the Regional Plant Ecologist if a acres of these species found there now. manage toward that 24) new location for a rare species is found - Retain or increase oak as a stand component balance, which includes a during this plan period, if a new species is (up to 2000 acres).
    [Show full text]
  • What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H
    A publication oF the Superior Hiking TrAil AssoCiation SUmmEr 2019 What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H o im Malzhan iS the trail operations director T o for our sister trail organization the ice Age B y Fr Trail Alliance in Wisconsin. Doing business as esh T “Trail Eyes,” Tim was one of four entities the SHTA Tr hired in the fall of 2018 to evaluate and recom- ac mend renewal strategies for what we have dubbed k S mE D “The Big Bad Five,” those sections of the SHT most damaged from heavy use and old age (or both). i A Though all four evaluators—malzhan, Critical Connections Ecological Services (Jason and Amy Husveth), the north Country Trail Association, and (Continued on page 2) What the “Trail Eyes” Taught Us About the SHT (continued from cover) Great Lakes Trail Builders (Wil- lie Bittner)—did what we asked (provide specific prescriptions for the Big Bad Five), their ex- pert observations gave us much more: they shed light on the en- tire Superior Hiking Trail. In other words, what they saw on the Split Rock River loop, or the sections from Britton Peak to Oberg Mountain and Oberg to the Lutsen ski complex, or the proposed reroute of the SHT north of Gooseberry Falls State Park, were microcosms of bigger, more systemic issues with the SHT. ❚ “keep people on the Trail and water off of it.” This suc- cinct wisdom comes from Matt no bridge is not the only problem at the Split rock river loop.
    [Show full text]