DOCSLIB.ORG

MN CWCS, Links to Other Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MN CWCS, Links to Other Plans Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Appendix C Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife Links to Other Plans (organized alphabetically by subsection) Appendix C. Links to other plans 1 Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife V09.28.2005 Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Agassiz Lowlands A. Other Plans/Efforts in Subsection Plan Page Composition Succession/ development Spatial Sites Agassiz Lowlands Subsection pp. ii, iii, 3- - Key changes in forest composition include - Ideally, a cover type has - Patches will be - Consult the Natural Heritage Database Forest Resource Management 4 to 3-9 more acres of jack pine (+5400 acres), white a balance of age classes to distributed in a during stand selection, and field visits, to Plan (SFRMP), Dec. 2002 pine (+988 acres), red pine (+1953 acres), provide a sustainable range of ages and identify known locations of rare species or upland tamarack (+615 acres), upland white range of wildlife habitat sizes characteristic plant communities of concern. cedar (+1510 acres), spruce/fir (+2500 acres), and forest products. One of the - Consult with the Regional Non-game and northern hardwoods (+619 acres) than the goal of this plan is to landscape. (p. 3- Specialist or the Regional Plant Ecologist if a acres of these species found there now. manage toward that 24) new location for a rare species is found - Retain or increase oak as a stand component balance, which includes a during this plan period, if a new species is (up to 2000 acres). percentage of older forest. added to the ETS list, or for assistance in - And a decrease in aspen-birch stands (-13545 Balanced age-class managing for rare species at known acres). distribution, including locations. - Maintain acreage and mosaic of brushlands/ Extended Rotation Forest - Reference the Forestry/Wildlife Guidelines. peatlands at the current level (815376 acres). (ERF) and old growth. Originally published in 1985, this document (pp. 3-4 to 3-9) -ERF ranges from 30 to provides specific guidelines for the - The DNR will manage forest stands to 100% (prescribed) management of Bald Eagles and other ETS provide a diversity of plant species and forest depending on the cover species. structure. (p. 3-25) type (see pp. 3-17, 3-18, - Encourage completion of the MCBS. table 5). Information from the MCBS is needed for (pp.3-14 to 3-19) the identification and location of rare species and features in the Agassiz Lowlands. (pp. 3- 20 to 3-23) Forest Resources Council To maintain a viable, healthy functioning Northern Landscape Region, May ecosystem on the landscape. 25, 2004 (No specific compositional, age-class, or patch Desired Future Forest Condition Goals articulated.) The Nature Conservancy, The pp. 37-39; Priority conservation areas: Superior Mixed Forest Ecoregion: Appendix Terrestrial – Lake of the Woods; Rainy River A Conservation Plan, November G Clay Plain; Pine Island/Warroad River; 2002 Black River; Red Lake Peatland; Upper Tamarack; Upper Roseau Aquatic – Manomin; Rainy River; Sandy River; Rapid River; Warroad River; Clearwater River; Winter Road River Ecoregional Planning in the Map, p. 56; Priority conservation areas: Northern Tallgrass Prairie, The Figure 15 Terrestrial – Moose River Nature Conservancy, May 1998 The Nature Conservancy, The Appendix 4 Priority conservation areas: Northern Tallgrass Prairie Aquatic – Red Lake/Clearwater Rivers; Rat Ecoregion: A River and Stream and Roseau Rivers Appendix C. Links to other plans 2 Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife V09.28.2005 Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Conservation Portfolio Minnesota Wetlands Conservation pp. 33; 38 Maintain: Plan – January 1997 -Non-forested wetlands (mostly types 2, 5) -Lowland shrublands (type 6 wetlands) -Lowland conifer forests (type 8) -Percent of area as wetlands: 83% (of 4,356,036 acres) -Estimated remaining presettlement wetlands: 89-98% -Percentages based NWI layer Type 1: 0.23% Type 2: 7.6% Type3: 0.57% Type4: 0.20% Type5: 14.52% Type6: 16.09% Type7: 11.06% Type8: 33.12% Appendix C. Links to other plans 3 Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife V09.28.2005 Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Anoka Sand Plain A. Other Plans/Efforts in Subsection Plan Page Composition Succession/development Spatial Sites Minnesota p. 45 Goal: Wetland restoration Wetlands Estimated remaining presettlement wetlands: 33-80% Conservation Plan Percent of area as wetlands: 23% – January 1997 Type 1 3.56 Type 2 9.68 Type 3 39.89 Type 4 1.39 Type 5 14.11 Type 6 18.69 Type 7 11.19 Type 8 1.48 SFRMP (not completed – expected to begin again soon) MN Forest -Protecting and enhancing biological and structural - To achieve an adequate distribution -Protect large intact forest areas Resources Council: diversity (p16) of age classes across the landscape that are threatened from conversion Forest Resource -Generate guidelines to ensure the production of oak (p14) to non-forest uses. (pp7-8) Management in stands through more intensive improvement cuts, -Increase age class diversity of forest - To benefit the wildlife, fish and East Central harvest and regeneration practices types by harvesting and regeneration biodiversity of the area through Minnesota, A -To manage northern hardwood and other cover types some acres of birch, jack pine, and protection of larger blocks of Landscape for purpose of forest health and habitat (p14) oak cover. forest, i.e. prevent fragmentation. Perspective, June -Put land in wildlife preservation programs to protect -Conversion of some aspen, birch, (p12) 2004 endangered or threatened species and jack pine to communities of long- - To move forests to a more ideal http://www.frc.stat -Balance the forest diversity by maintaining forest lived types (p14) patch size distribution (p14) e.mn.us/Info/MFR composition that was present historically -Perform passive management i.e. fire Uneven-aged management Cdocs/East_Centra -To restore areas to native prairie and wetlands suppression and natural selection in standards. l_Landscape_Persp -Improve habitat through vegetation management open woods, open conifer areas and Patch size distribution: ectives_Report.pdf (p12) regions with northern hardwoods 640+ acres: 10% of landscape - Increase protection of water quality through (p14) 250 – 639 acres: 15% vegetated cover and riparian buffers (p10) 100-249 acres: 40% 40-99 acres: 25% <40 acres: 10% The Nature Table 5 Priority conservation Conservancy, The and areas: Prairie-Forest Appendi Terrestrial – Lake Maria Appendix C. Links to other plans 4 Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife V09.28.2005 Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Border Ecoregion: x E State Park; St. Cloud A Conservation Area Outcrop; Sherburne Plan Refuge-Sand Dunes State Forest; Elk River Dunes; Cedar Creek NHA- Carlos Avery WMA Aquatic – Minnesota River; Rum River; Upper Mississippi River; North Fork Crow River Aquatic/Terrestrial – Upper Mississippi River The Nature pp. 37- Priority conservation Conservancy, The 39; areas: Superior Mixed Appendi Terrestrial – St. Croix Forest Ecoregion: x G Moraine; Rum River A Conservation Headwaters Plan, November 2002 The Nature Appendi Priority conservation Conservancy, The x 4 areas: Northern Tallgrass Aquatic – Minnesota Prairie Ecoregion: River Mainstem A River and Stream Conservation Portfolio The Nature Priority conservation Conservancy areas: (UMR-specific): Aquatic – Northern Stretch; Pool 1; Pool 2; Lower Minnesota; Mississippi River; Sauk River; North Fork Crow River; Rum River; Coon River; Sunrise River; Hardwood Creek; Minnehaha Creek See also: Isanti County Comprehensive Local Water Plan, 2000 Isanti County Comprehensive Plan, 1998 Morrison County Water Plan, 2002 Benton County Comprehensive Plan, 1999 Sherburne County Comprehensive Water Management Plan, 2001 Appendix C. Links to other plans 5 Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife V09.28.2005 Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Sherburne County Comprehensive Land Use Plan, 1992 Appendix C. Links to other plans 6 Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife V09.28.2005 Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Aspen Parklands A. Other Plans/Efforts in Subsection Plan Pages Composition Succession/development Spatial Site MN DNR NW Region III-11 to - Establish coarse-grained mosaics of prairies, - Burn aspen parkland habitats on a in relatively large Natural Resources Plan, III-15, III- brush prairies, fens, wetlands, and woodlands 5-10 year cycle. blocks (ideally 2000 DRAFT, June 1994 27 to III- - Retain or increase the oak component of aspen - Maintain a component of older acres or more). 33. stands, particularly on drier sites. trees where long-lived species (eg - Maintain relatively - Maintain a component of (lowland) conifers oak) occur. Extended rotation of large consolidated where they have occurred historically. 120 years for oak. blocks of public land, - Maintain a component of aspen stands - Even-aged mgmt of aspen and minimally 40 acres, throughout the sub-landscape. balm of gilead stands (40-45 year but ideally thousands rotations). of acres in each block. Ecoregional Planning in the Map, p. 56; Priority conservation areas: Northern Tallgrass Prairie, Figure 15 Terrestrial – Tallgrass Aspen The Nature Conservancy, Parklands; Agassiz Dunes; May 1998 Agassiz NWR; Chester Hills; Goose
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bud Heinselman and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, 1964–65 KEVIN PROESCHOLDT
    FIRST FIGHT Bud Heinselman and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, 1964–65 KEVIN PROESCHOLDT innesotan Miron L. “Bud” Heinselman worked swamp black spruce on peatlands. Heinselman’s doctoral Mhis entire career for the U.S. Forest Service as a for- dissertation centered on peatlands ecology in the basin of ester and ecologist. Through his extensive research, he be- the former glacial Lake Agassiz in Minnesota; the presti- came one of the nation’s foremost experts in the separate gious scientific journal, Ecological Monographs, published fields of peatlands, forest ecology, and fire ecology. Beyond these findings in 1963. He was a careful and meticulous those quiet scientific accomplishments, Heinselman also researcher, not one to overstate his findings.2 played a very public role in leading the citizen effort from By 1960 Heinselman was living in Grand Rapids, Min- 1976 to 1978 to pass the 1978 Boundary Waters Canoe Area nesota, continuing research for the Forest Service’s Lake Wilderness (BWCAW) Act through Congress, providing States Forest Experiment Station. He had always been new protections for the area.1 interested in conservation and had joined several non- But a dozen years earlier, Heinselman had cut his ad- profit organizations, including the Izaak Walton League vocacy teeth on another campaign to protect the million- of America (IWLA). He became active in the “Ikes,” was acre Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA), as it was then president of its Grand Rapids chapter in the early 1960s, known. From 1964 to 1965, largely out of the public view, and served on the IWLA Minnesota Division’s Wilderness he organized conservationists with enthusiasm and a clear Committee, chaired by his Grand Rapids friend Adolph T.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Summary
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 1999 NATURAL RESOURCES LEGISLATION A SUMMARY OF THE ACTIONS OF THE 1999 REGULAR SESSION OF THE EIGHTY-FIRST MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LEGISLATIVE UNIT AUGUST, 1999 1999 Department of Natural Resources Legislative Summary -Table of Contents- General Natural Resources Administration 1 General Rules 2 Enforcement 3 Fish and Wildlife 4 Forestry 5 Lands and Minerals 6 Parks 7 Trails and Waterways 8 Waters 9 Omnibus Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture Appropriations Bill 10-18 GENERAL NATURAL RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION CH249 TECHNICAL BILL - REVISORS HF(2441) SF2224 An act relating to legislative enactments; correcting technical errors; amending Minnesota Statutes 1998, sections 97A.075, subd. 1; 124D.135, subd. 3, as amended; 124D.54, subd. 1, as amended; 256.476, subd. 8, as amended; 322B.115, subd. 4; SF 626, section 44; SF 2221, article 1, section 2, subd. 4; section 7, subd. 6; section 8, subd. 3; section 12, subd. 1; section 13, subd. 1; section 18; SF 2226, section 5, subd. 4; section 6; HF 1825, section 12; HF 2390, article 1, section 2, subds. 2 and 4; section 4, subd. 4; section 17, subd. 1; article 2, section 81; HF 2420, article 5, section 18; article 6, section 2; proposing coding in Minnesota Statutes 1998, chapter 126C. EFFECTIVE: Various Dates - 1 - GENERAL RULES CH250 OMNIBUS STATE DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL HF878 SF(1464) Removes the ability for state agencies to impose a new fee or increase existing fees by rule as of July 1, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Synthesis for Voyageurs National Park
    Aquatic Synthesis for Voyageurs National Park Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR—2003-0001 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Technical Report Series The Biological Resources Division publishes scientific and technical articles and reports resulting from the research performed by our scientists and partners. These articles appear in professional journals around the world. Reports are published in two report series: Biological Science Reports and Information and Technology Reports. Series Descriptions Biological Science Reports ISSN 1081-292X Information and Technology Reports ISSN 1081-2911 This series records the significant findings resulting These reports are intended for publication of book- from sponsored and co-sponsored research programs. length monographs; synthesis documents; compilations They may include extensive data or theoretical analyses. of conference and workshop papers; important planning Papers in this series are held to the same peer-review and and reference materials such as strategic plans, standard high-quality standards as their journal counterparts. operating procedures, protocols, handbooks, and manuals; and data compilations such as tables and bibliographies. Papers in this series are held to the same peer-review and high-quality standards as their journal counterparts. Copies of this publication are available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 (1-800-553-6847 or 703-487-4650). Copies also are available to registered users from the Defense Technical Information Center, Attn.: Help Desk, 8725 Kingman Road, Suite 0944, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218 (1-800-225-3842 or 703-767-9050). An electronic version of this report is available on-line at: <http://www.cerc.usgs.gov/pubs/center/pdfdocs/ITR2003-0001.pdf> Front cover: Aerial photo looking east over Namakan Lake, Voyageurs National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Voyageurs National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Voyageurs National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2007/007 THIS PAGE: A geologist highlights a geologic contact during a Geologic Resource Evaluation scoping field trip at Voyageurs NP, MN ON THE COVER: Aerial view of Voyageurs NP, MN NPS Photos Voyageurs National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2007/007 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 June 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer- reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly- published newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks.Pdf
    Table of Contents 1. Afton State Park 4 2. Banning State Park 6 3. Bear Head Lake State Park 8 4. Beaver Creek Valley State Park 10 5. Big Bog State Park 12 6. Big Stone Lake State Park 14 7. Blue Mounds State Park 16 8. Buffalo River State Park 18 9. Camden State Park 20 10. Carley State Park 22 11. Cascade River State Park 24 12. Charles A. Lindbergh State Park 26 13. Crow Wing State Park 28 14. Cuyuna Country State Park 30 15. Father Hennepin State Park 32 16. Flandrau State Park 34 17. Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park 36 18. Fort Ridgely State Park 38 19. Fort Snelling State Park 40 20. Franz Jevne State Park 42 21. Frontenac State Park 44 22. George H. Crosby Manitou State Park 46 23. Glacial Lakes State Park 48 24. Glendalough State Park 50 25. Gooseberry Falls State Park 52 26. Grand Portage State Park 54 27. Great River Bluffs State Park 56 28. Hayes Lake State Park 58 29. Hill Annex Mine State Park 60 30. Interstate State Park 62 31. Itasca State Park 64 32. Jay Cooke State Park 66 33. John A. Latsch State Park 68 34. Judge C.R. Magney State Park 70 1 35. Kilen Woods State Park 72 36. Lac qui Parle State Park 74 37. Lake Bemidji State Park 76 38. Lake Bronson State Park 78 39. Lake Carlos State Park 80 40. Lake Louise State Park 82 41. Lake Maria State Park 84 42. Lake Shetek State Park 86 43.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Division
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Minnesota State Archives CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT Forestry Division An Inventory of Its Administrative Subject Files OVERVIEW OF THE RECORDS Agency: Minnesota. Division of Forestry. Series Title: Administrative subject files. Dates: 1900-1978. Quantity: 19.2 cu. ft. (19 boxes and 1 partial box) Location: See Detailed Description section for box locations. SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE RECORDS Subject files documenting the administrative aspects of the division's activities and duties. Including correspondence, photographs, reports, statistics, studies, financial records, circular letters, policy directives, land use permits, operational orders, and conservation work project plans and programs, the files document such topics as state forest and lands management, timber law, multiple use, land acquisition and sale or exchange, campgrounds and picnic areas, public access and boating, wilderness areas, wildlife management, forest fire protection and prevention, tax-forfeiture, roads and trails, state parks, environmental education, land ownership, forestation, Civilian Conservation Corps camp locations, federal land grants, school and Volstead lands, mining, lakeshore, peat, road right-of-ways, natural and scientific areas, watersheds, lake levels, Shipstead-Nolan Act, slash disposal, county and private forests, tree farms, school forests, and nursery programs. The files also document the division's relations with the Youth Conservation Commission, Keep Minnesota Green, Inc., U. S. Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Forest Service, Izaak Walton League, Minnesota Outdoor Recreation Resources Commission, Minnesota Resources Commission, and various of the other Conservation Department's divisions. Areas particularly highlighted in the files include the Minnesota Memorial Hardwood State Forest, Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Itasca State Park, Chippewa National Forest, Kabetogama State Forest, Grand Portage State Forest, Voyageurs National Park, Quetico-Superior, and Superior National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • 2/23/2017 1 List of Terrestrial Invasive Species and Infested Areas in The
    2/23/2017 List of Terrestrial Invasive Species and Infested Areas in the 1854 Ceded Territory Common Buckthorn: Noxious weed – Restricted list St. Louis County: large, dense areas, widespread o all of the greater Duluth area, Moose Mountain SNA, Ruffed Grouse WMA, MN Point Pine Forest SNA, Quad Cities area, Buhl, Aurora, Cook, Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park, Bear Head Lake State Park, Ely area Carlton County: less dense, smaller distribution than SLC o Jay Cooke State Forest, Fond du Lac State Forest (Red River area), Blackhoof WMA Lake County: low distribution in a few dense patches o Two Harbors area Cook County: rare o Grand Marais (1 known male? planted in a yard) Glossy Buckthorn: Noxious weed – Restricted list St. Louis County: large, dense areas, widespread (less than common buckthorn) o all of the greater Duluth area, Moose Mountain SNA, MN Point Pine Forest SNA, south of Eveleth (between Mud Lake and Saint Marys Lake), Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park Carlton County: less dense, smaller distribution than St. Louis County o Hemlock Ravine SNA, Fond du Lac State Forest (Red River area), Blackhoof WMA, Moose Lake Exotic Honeysuckle: Noxious weed – Restricted list St. Louis County: large, dense areas, widespread (less than Common Buckthorn) o all of the greater Duluth area, Moose Mountain SNA, Ruffed Grouse WMA, MN Point Pine Forest SNA rest of the counties: widespread, less dense, smaller distribution than SLC Oriental Bittersweet: Noxious weed – Prohibited Eradicate list St. Louis County: pioneer population, rare o in Duluth (along I-35 around exit/entrance ramps 253A) and on private property in the East Hillside neighborhood, Fortune Bay Canada Thistle: Noxious weed – Prohibited Control list All counties: widespread, multiple dense patches o Superior National Forest, Moose Mountain SNA, MN Point Pine Forest SNA Spiny Plumeless Thistle: Noxious weed – Prohibited Control list St.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Condition Assessment: Voyageurs National Park
    015 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Voyageurs National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/VOYA/NRR—2015/1007 ON THE COVER Beaver Point overlook, Voyageurs National Park Photograph by: Dave Mechenich Natural Resource Condition Assessment Voyageurs National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/VOYA/NRR—2015/1007 Christine Mechenich1, Justin A. VanDeHey2, James E. Cook2, David J. Mechenich1, Jennifer L. McNelly1, and George J. Kraft1 1Center for Watershed Science and Education College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 2College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 August 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County
    Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage Alabama 1st Escambia Conecuh National Forest 29,179 1st Totals 29,179 2nd Coffee Pea River Land Utilization Project 40 Covington Conecuh National Forest 54,881 2nd Totals 54,921 3rd Calhoun Rose Purchase Unit 161 Talladega National Forest 21,412 Cherokee Talladega National Forest 2,229 Clay Talladega National Forest 66,763 Cleburne Talladega National Forest 98,750 Macon Tuskegee National Forest 11,348 Talladega Talladega National Forest 46,272 3rd Totals 246,935 4th Franklin William B. Bankhead National Forest 1,277 Lawrence William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,681 Winston William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,030 4th Totals 181,988 6th Bibb Talladega National Forest 60,867 Chilton Talladega National Forest 22,986 6th Totals 83,853 2018 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/13/2018 Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage 7th Dallas Talladega National Forest 2,167 Hale Talladega National Forest 28,051 Perry Talladega National Forest 32,796 Tuscaloosa Talladega National Forest 10,998 7th Totals 74,012 Alabama Totals 670,888 Alaska At Large Anchorage Municipality Chugach National Forest 248,417 Haines Borough Tongass National Forest 767,952 Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Tongass National Forest 1,974,292 Juneau City and Borough Tongass National Forest 1,672,846 Kenai Peninsula Borough Chugach National Forest 1,261,067 Ketchikan Gateway Borough Tongass
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions – Superior National Forest
    Frequently Asked Questions – Superior National Forest Does my canoe have to be licensed to be used in Minnesota? Yes, all watercraft used in the state of Minnesota are required to be licensed. If your watercraft is already licensed in another state, that is also acceptable. You can find more information and where to purchase a license at: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/licenses/watercraft/index.html , or by calling 1-888-646-6367 How much is a fishing license and where can I get one? The cost of a license may change from year to year and depends on whether you’re a Minnesota resident or a non- resident. You can find current information at: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/licenses/fishing/index.html?type=fishing Or by calling 1-888-646-6367 The State of Minnesota also offers an “instant license” by calling 1-888-665- 4236. There is an additional charge for this service. What should I do with my fish “guts?” Bury or scatter fish remains well away from campsites, trails, portages and shorelines. STATE LAW PROHIBITS PUTTING FISH REMAINS INTO THE WATERS, LAKES, STREAMS OR RIVERS. If I fish U.S./Canadian border waters, how many fish can I have in possession? You can find this information in the Minnesota Fishing Regulations and online at http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/ . Go to “fish & wildlife”, and then go to “Fishing in Ontario”. Canadian permits are required in border waters if fishing on Canadian side. For more information visit: http://ontarioparks.com/ What are the hunting and fishing regulations on the Superior National Forest? Minnesota state regulations apply on Superior National Forest lands.
    [Show full text]
  • 1~11~~~~11Im~11M1~Mmm111111111111113 0307 00061 8069
    LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY ~ SD428.A2 M6 1986 -1~11~~~~11im~11m1~mmm111111111111113 0307 00061 8069 0 428 , A. M6 1 9 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) State Forest Recreation Areas Minnesota's 56 state forests contain over 3.2 million acres of state owned lands which are administered by the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. State forest lands are managed to produce timber and other forest crops, provide outdoor recreation, protect watershed, and perpetuate rare and distinctive species of flora and fauna. State forests are multiple use areas that are managed to provide a sustained yield of renewable resources, while maintaining or improving the quality of the forest. Minnesota's state forests provide unlimited opportunities for outdoor recreationists to pursue a variety of outdoor activities. Berry picking, mushroom hunting, wildflower identification, nature photography and hunting are just a few of the unstructured outdoor activities which can be accommodated in state forests. For people who prefer a more structured form of recreation, Minnesota's state forests contain over 50 campgrounds, most located on lakes or canoe routes. State forest campgrounds are of the primitive type designed to furnish only the basic needs of individuals who camp for the enjoyment of the outdoors. Each campsite consists of a cleared area, fireplace and table. In addition, pit toilets, garbage cans and drinking water may be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Resilience in the Mixed Forest Province of Northern Minnesota Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program
    Building Resilience in the Mixed Forest Province of Northern Minnesota A proposal for the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program Superior and Chippewa National Forests In collaboration with The Nature Conservancy and Members of the Minnesota Forest Resources Council May 2010 Building Resilience in the Mixed Forest Province of Northern Minnesota Proposed Treatments – Page 1 Section 1 – Proposed Treatment This project, “Building Resilience in the Mixed Forest Province of Minnesota” (Minnesota Resilience Project), is part of a larger initiative in northern Minnesota to implement complementary, cross-ownership federal, county and state forest restoration projects, to enhance forest habitat and productivity, and protect jobs. We will accomplish this through vegetation management treatments that promote the restoration of conifer trees and forests to the landscape. Overview The Chippewa and Superior National Forests (Minnesota’s National Forests) form the core of Minnesota’s northern forest, which historically held vast acreages of red and white pine, white cedar, tamarack, jack pine, and white and black spruce. These species and their supporting habitat types were maintained by frequent surface fires. However, following turn of the century logging, slash burning, and wildfires, these conifer species did not return to pre-harvest levels. Instead, Minnesota’s forests were colonized by aspen and birch at levels far exceeding those found in the natural pre-settlement forest. Although from an economic and recreational perspective we have learned to prosper from this dramatic shift in forest composition, and we do not seek to fully return to historical conditions, the change has brought a long list of economic and ecological challenges from emerging stressors including climate change, unnatural intensity and frequency of wildfire, and an increasing susceptibility to pests and pathogens.
    [Show full text]