Advice from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advice from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee The Threatened Species Scientific Committee agreed that this species was eligible to be retained as vulnerable on 3 December 2009 Advice from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) on the list of Threatened Species under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Reason for Conservation Assessment by the Committee This advice follows assessment of new information on: Pseudomys pilligaensis (Pilliga mouse) 2. Summary of Species Details Taxonomy Though recent genetic work suggests this species is a southern population of the non-significant Pseudomys delicatulus (Ford, 2008, cited in Van Dyck and Strahan, 2008), this is not conventionally accepted. State Listing Status This species is listed as endangered under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. Description A small rodent with grey fur and a white belly. Its dark tail ends with a small, black tuft. This species grows to 8 cm long, with a tail to 8 cm long, and can weigh up to 12 g. It is distinguished from other similar mice by its relatively long hindfeet (Fox and Brisco 1980). Distribution Known only from the type locality in Pilliga, NSW, and three other nearby sites all in the immediate surrounding area (Fox and Brisco, 1980). This includes the Pilliga Nature Reserve and the adjacent Pilliga State Forest (Lee, 1995). This area is known as the Pilliga scrub (Tokushima et al., 2008). Relevant Biology/Ecology This species exhibits irruptive demography (Ford, 2008). One survey observed an irruptive population in post fire habitat during a high rainfall period (Tokushima et al. 2008). It is unknown which of these factors is more important: rainfall, and associated food availability, is known to lead to population increases in arid and semi arid rodents; similarly, other rodent species have shown higher population densities in areas of regenerating vegetation (Tokushima et al., 2008). Threats Known The main identified threats to the Pilliga Mouse include loss or degradation of habitat through inappropriate fire regimes, forestry operations and broombrush harvesting; predation by Felis catus (feral cats) and Vulpes vulpes (foxes); and competition from the Mus musculus (common house mouse) (TSSC, 2008). Potential There are no known potential threats. 3. Public Consultation Notice of the proposed amendment was made available for public comment for 30 business days. Any comments received that are relevant to the survival of the species have been considered by the Committee. Pseudomys pilligaensis (Pilliga mouse) Listing Advice Page 1 of 4 The Threatened Species Scientific Committee agreed that this species was eligible to be retained as vulnerable on 3 December 2009 4. How judged by the Committee in relation to the EPBC Act criteria and Regulations Criterion 1: It has undergone, is suspected to have undergone or is likely to undergo in the immediate future a very severe, severe or substantial reduction in numbers Not eligible Criterion element Evidence Reduction in numbers Insufficient data – The species undergoes population irruptions which have been observed in disturbed (including post fire) habitats during high rainfall periods. Peak densities occur approximately 20 months following disturbance events. Population declines, following a peak, are rapid and may be the result of shortage of food, social suppression of reproduction, predation and disease (Tokushima et al., 2008). Criterion 2: Its geographic distribution is precarious for the survival of the species and is very restricted, restricted or limited Not eligible Criterion element Evidence Geographic distribution Limited – This species known only to occur within the Pilliga Scrub, an area less that 8000 km2 (Fox and Briscoe, 1980). AND Geographic distribution Insufficient data – Known from a limited distribution and several precarious threats have been identified, though their impact is not known. Criterion 3: The estimated total number of mature individuals is very low, low or limited; and either (a) evidence suggests that the number will continue to decline at a very high, high or substantial rate; or (b) the number is likely to continue to decline and its geographic distribution is precarious for its survival Not eligible Criterion element Evidence Total no. of mature No data individuals AND Continued rate of decline Insufficient data – See Criterion 1 OR Total no. of mature No data Pseudomys pilligaensis (Pilliga mouse) Listing Advice Page 2 of 4 The Threatened Species Scientific Committee agreed that this species was eligible to be retained as vulnerable on 3 December 2009 individuals AND Continued decline likely Insufficient data – See Criterion 2 AND Geographic distribution Insufficient data – See Criterion 2 precarious Criterion 4: The estimated total number of mature individuals is extremely low, very low or low Not eligible Criterion element Evidence Total no. of mature No data individuals Criterion 5: Probability of extinction in the wild that is at least (a) 50% in the immediate future; or (b) 20% in the near future; or (c) 10% in the medium-term future Not eligible Criterion element Evidence Probability of extinction in No data the wild 5. Recommendation The Committee recommends no amendment to the list referred to in section 178 of the EPBC Act and that Pseudomys pilligaensis remains eligible for inclusion in the vulnerable category of the list. Threatened Species Scientific Committee 3 December 2009 Pseudomys pilligaensis (Pilliga mouse) Listing Advice Page 3 of 4 The Threatened Species Scientific Committee agreed that this species was eligible to be retained as vulnerable on 3 December 2009 6. References cited in the advice Ford F (2008). Delicate Mouse Pseudomys delicatulus (Gould, 1842). In Van Dyck, S & Strahan, R (eds). The Mammals of Australia, Third Edition. Sydney: Reed New Holland. Fox, BJ and Briscoe, DA 1980, ‘Pseudomys pilligaensis, a new species of murid rodent from the Pilliga Scrub, northern New South Wales’, Australian Mammalogy 3: 109-126. Lee AK (1995). The Action Plan for Australian Rodents, Environment Australia: Canberra. Available on the Internet at: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/action/rodents/index.html Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) (2008). Approved conservation advice for Pseudomys delicatulus (Pilliga mouse). Available on the Internet at: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/99-conservation- advice.pdf Tokushima H, Green SW and Jarman PJ (2008). Ecology of the rare but irruptive Pilliga mouse (Pseudomys pilligaensis). I. Population fluctuation and breeding season. Australian Journal of Zoology 56: 363-373. Pseudomys pilligaensis (Pilliga mouse) Listing Advice Page 4 of 4 .
Recommended publications
  • Platypus Collins, L.R
    AUSTRALIAN MAMMALS BIOLOGY AND CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Stephen Jackson © CSIRO 2003 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact CSIRO PUBLISHING for all permission requests. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Jackson, Stephen M. Australian mammals: Biology and captive management Bibliography. ISBN 0 643 06635 7. 1. Mammals – Australia. 2. Captive mammals. I. Title. 599.0994 Available from CSIRO PUBLISHING 150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139) Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Local call: 1300 788 000 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.publish.csiro.au Cover photos courtesy Stephen Jackson, Esther Beaton and Nick Alexander Set in Minion and Optima Cover and text design by James Kelly Typeset by Desktop Concepts Pty Ltd Printed in Australia by Ligare REFERENCES reserved. Chapter 1 – Platypus Collins, L.R. (1973) Monotremes and Marsupials: A Reference for Zoological Institutions. Smithsonian Institution Press, rights Austin, M.A. (1997) A Practical Guide to the Successful Washington. All Handrearing of Tasmanian Marsupials. Regal Publications, Collins, G.H., Whittington, R.J. & Canfield, P.J. (1986) Melbourne. Theileria ornithorhynchi Mackerras, 1959 in the platypus, 2003. Beaven, M. (1997) Hand rearing of a juvenile platypus. Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Shaw). Journal of Wildlife Proceedings of the ASZK/ARAZPA Conference. 16–20 March.
    [Show full text]
  • Calaby References
    Abbott, I.J. (1974). Natural history of Curtis Island, Bass Strait. 5. Birds, with some notes on mammal trapping. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 107: 171–74. General; Rodents; Abbott, I. (1978). Seabird islands No. 56 Michaelmas Island, King George Sound, Western Australia. Corella 2: 26–27. (Records rabbit and Rattus fuscipes). General; Rodents; Lagomorphs; Abbott, I. (1981). Seabird Islands No. 106 Mondrain Island, Archipelago of the Recherche, Western Australia. Corella 5: 60–61. (Records bush-rat and rock-wallaby). General; Rodents; Abbott, I. and Watson, J.R. (1978). The soils, flora, vegetation and vertebrate fauna of Chatham Island, Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 60: 65–70. (Only mammal is Rattus fuscipes). General; Rodents; Adams, D.B. (1980). Motivational systems of agonistic behaviour in muroid rodents: a comparative review and neural model. Aggressive Behavior 6: 295–346. Rodents; Ahern, L.D., Brown, P.R., Robertson, P. and Seebeck, J.H. (1985). Application of a taxon priority system to some Victorian vertebrate fauna. Fisheries and Wildlife Service, Victoria, Arthur Rylah Institute of Environmental Research Technical Report No. 32: 1–48. General; Marsupials; Bats; Rodents; Whales; Land Carnivores; Aitken, P. (1968). Observations on Notomys fuscus (Wood Jones) (Muridae-Pseudomyinae) with notes on a new synonym. South Australian Naturalist 43: 37–45. Rodents; Aitken, P.F. (1969). The mammals of the Flinders Ranges. Pp. 255–356 in Corbett, D.W.P. (ed.) The natural history of the Flinders Ranges. Libraries Board of South Australia : Adelaide. (Gives descriptions and notes on the echidna, marsupials, murids, and bats recorded for the Flinders Ranges; also deals with the introduced mammals, including the dingo).
    [Show full text]
  • Ba3444 MAMMAL BOOKLET FINAL.Indd
    Intot Obliv i The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia Compiled by James Fitzsimons Sarah Legge Barry Traill John Woinarski Into Oblivion? The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia 1 SUMMARY Since European settlement, the deepest loss of Australian biodiversity has been the spate of extinctions of endemic mammals. Historically, these losses occurred mostly in inland and in temperate parts of the country, and largely between 1890 and 1950. A new wave of extinctions is now threatening Australian mammals, this time in northern Australia. Many mammal species are in sharp decline across the north, even in extensive natural areas managed primarily for conservation. The main evidence of this decline comes consistently from two contrasting sources: robust scientifi c monitoring programs and more broad-scale Indigenous knowledge. The main drivers of the mammal decline in northern Australia include inappropriate fi re regimes (too much fi re) and predation by feral cats. Cane Toads are also implicated, particularly to the recent catastrophic decline of the Northern Quoll. Furthermore, some impacts are due to vegetation changes associated with the pastoral industry. Disease could also be a factor, but to date there is little evidence for or against it. Based on current trends, many native mammals will become extinct in northern Australia in the next 10-20 years, and even the largest and most iconic national parks in northern Australia will lose native mammal species. This problem needs to be solved. The fi rst step towards a solution is to recognise the problem, and this publication seeks to alert the Australian community and decision makers to this urgent issue.
    [Show full text]
  • WRA23 Fauna Report Sept 2002
    VVEERRTTEEBBRRAATTEE Brigalow Belt South FFAAUUNNAA SSUURRVVEEYY,, AANNAALLYYSSIISS AANNDD Stage 2 MMOODDEELLLLIINNGG PROJECTS PROJECTS NSW WESTERN REGIONAL ASSESSMENTS SEPTEMBER 2002 Resource and Conservation Assessment Council VERTEBRATE FAUNA SURVEY, ANALYSIS AND MODELLING PROJECTS NSW WESTERN REGIONAL ASSESSMENTS BRIGALOW BELT SOUTH BIOREGION (STAGE 2) NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Projects undertaken for the Resource and Conservation Assessment Council NSW Western Regional Assessments Project numbers WRA 23 and WRA 27 For more information and for information on access to data contact the: Resource and Conservation Division, Planning NSW GPO Box 3927 SYDNEY NSW 2002 Phone: (02) 9762 8052 Fax: (02) 9762 8712 www.racac.nsw.gov.au © Crown copyright September 2002 New South Wales Government ISBN [1740291921] This project has been funded and managed by the Resource and Conservation Division, Planning NSW Main Author: Michael Pennay Co Author: Carl Gosper Co Authors (Species Profiles): Jade Freeman, Robyn Molsher, Marc Irvin, Tania Laity. Reviewers: Murray Ellis (NPWS), Darren Shelly (DLWC), Jim Shields (SFNSW), David Goldney (Charles Sturt University), Martin Denny (Independent), Todd Soderquist (NPWS). Acknowledgments: Western Regional Assessment Unit Manager: Gary Saunders. Project Manager: Michael Pennay. Technical Working Group: Murray Ellis (NPWS), Darren Shelly (DLWC), Jim Shields (SFNSW), David Goldney (Charles Sturt University). GIS Support: Heidi Henry, Steve Thornton, Michael Pennay. Data entry: Jade Freeman, Rebecca Drury. Data check: Technical Working Group, Carl Gosper, Rebecca Drury, Chris Turbill, Michael Pennay. Bat Call Analysis: Greg Ford. Voucher specimen identification: Sandy Ingleby, Terry Reardon, Hank Godthelp, Harry Parnaby, Ross Sadlier, Australian Museum. Survey Team Leaders: Rebecca Drury, Carl Gosper, Michael Pennay. NPWS Survey Team Members: Alex Dudley, Chris Turbill.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodents Bibliography
    Calaby’s Rodent Literature Abbott, I.J. (1974). Natural history of Curtis Island, Bass Strait. 5. Birds, with some notes on mammal trapping. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 107: 171–74. General; Rodents Abbott, I. (1978). Seabird islands No. 56 Michaelmas Island, King George Sound, Western Australia. Corella 2: 26–27. (Records rabbit and Rattus fuscipes). General; Rodents; Lagomorphs Abbott, I. (1981). Seabird Islands No. 106 Mondrain Island, Archipelago of the Recherche, Western Australia. Corella 5: 60–61. (Records bush-rat and rock-wallaby). General; Rodents Abbott, I. and Watson, J.R. (1978). The soils, flora, vegetation and vertebrate fauna of Chatham Island, Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 60: 65–70. (Only mammal is Rattus fuscipes). General; Rodents Adams, D.B. (1980). Motivational systems of agonistic behaviour in muroid rodents: a comparative review and neural model. Aggressive Behavior 6: 295–346. Rodents Ahern, L.D., Brown, P.R., Robertson, P. and Seebeck, J.H. (1985). Application of a taxon priority system to some Victorian vertebrate fauna. Fisheries and Wildlife Service, Victoria, Arthur Rylah Institute of Environmental Research Technical Report No. 32: 1–48. General; Marsupials; Bats; Rodents; Whales; Land Carnivores Aitken, P. (1968). Observations on Notomys fuscus (Wood Jones) (Muridae-Pseudomyinae) with notes on a new synonym. South Australian Naturalist 43: 37–45. Rodents; Aitken, P.F. (1969). The mammals of the Flinders Ranges. Pp. 255–356 in Corbett, D.W.P. (ed.) The natural history of the Flinders Ranges. Libraries Board of South Australia : Adelaide. (Gives descriptions and notes on the echidna, marsupials, murids, and bats recorded for the Flinders Ranges; also deals with the introduced mammals, including the dingo).
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Manual for the New Holland Mouse
    HUSBANDRY MANUAL FOR THE NEW HOLLAND MOUSE Pseudomys novaehollandiae . Contributors: Sonya Prosser Melbourne Zoo Mandy Lock Deakin University Kate Bodley Melbourne Zoo Jean Groat ex Melbourne Zoo Peter Myronuik ex Melbourne Zoo Peter Courtney Melbourne Zoo May 2007 CONTENTS: 1. Taxonomy 4 2. Conservation Status 4 3. Natural History 4 3.1 General Description 4 3.2 Distinguishing Features 4 3.3 Morphometrics 5 3.4 Distribution 5 3.5 Habitat 6 3.6 Wild Diet and Feeding Habits 6 3.7 Threats 7 3.8 Population Dynamics 7 3.9 Longevity 7 4. Housing Requirements 8 4.1 Indoors 8 4.1.1 Substrate 9 4.1.2 Enclosure Furnishings 9 4.1.3 Lighting 9 4.1.4 Temperature 9 4.1.5 Spatial Requirements 10 4.2 Outdoors 10 5. Handling and Transport 11 5.1 Timing of Capture and Handling 11 5.2 Catching Equipment 11 5.3 Capture and Restraint Techniques 11 5.4 Outdoors 14 5.5 Weighing and Examination 14 5.6 Release 14 5.7 Transport Requirements 14 7. Animal Health and Veterinary Care 15 7.1 Quarantine 15 7.2 Physical examination 15 7.3 Veterinary examination/procedures 15 7.4 Health Problems 16 8. Behaviour 20 9. Feeding requirements 20 9.1 Captive Diet 20 9.2 Presentation of food 21 9.3 Supplements 21 2 10. Breeding 21 10.1 Litter Size 21 10.2 Gestation 21 10.3 Sexual maturity 21 10.4 Oestrus 21 10.5 Parturition 21 10.6 Post partum oestrus 21 10.7 Weaning 21 10.8 Age at first and last breeding 21 10.9 Litter Size as a percentage of total litters 22 10.10 Birth Seasonality 22 10.11 Identification of Breeding Cycles 23 10.12 Copulation 24 10.13 Pregnancy 24 10.14 Parturition 24 10.15 Abnormal pregnancy/parturition 24 11.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overdue Break up of the Rodent Genus Pseudomys Into Subgenera As Well As the Formal Naming of Four New Species
    30 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology 49:30-41. Published 6 August 2020. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) An overdue break up of the rodent genus Pseudomys into subgenera as well as the formal naming of four new species. LSIDURN:LSID:ZOOBANK.ORG:PUB:627AB9F7-5AD1-4A44-8BBE-E245C4A3A441 RAYMOND T. HOSER LSIDurn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F9D74EB5-CFB5-49A0-8C7C-9F993B8504AE 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 1 May 2020, Accepted 8 July 2020, Published 6 August 2020. ABSTRACT An audit of all previously named species and synonyms within the putative genus of Australian mice Pseudomys (including genera phylogenetically included within Pseudomys in recent studies) found a number of distinctive and divergent species groups. Some of these groups have been treated by past authors as separate genera (e.g. Notomys Lesson, 1842) and others as subgenera (e.g. Thetomys Thomas, 1910). Other groups have been recognized (e.g. as done by Ford 2006), but remain unnamed. This paper assessed the current genus-level classification of all species and assigned them to species groups. Due to the relatively recent radiation and divergence of most species groups being around the five million year mark (Smissen 2017), the appropriate level of division was found to be subgenera. As a result, eleven subgenera are recognized, with five formally named for the first time in accordance with the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Ride et al. 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Range Extension of Pseudomys Hermannsburgensis in Queensland
    Eastern range extension of Pseudomys hermannsburgensis in Queensland A.S. Kutt1, C. Eddie2 and R. Johnson2 1 School of Tropical Biology and Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811. Current address: Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (Environmental Protection Agency), PO Box 5391, Townsville, QLD 4810. Email: [email protected]. gov.au 2 Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 981, Roma, QLD 4455. Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/australian-zoologist/article-pdf/32/2/252/1475744/az_2003_007.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 Introduction The Sandy Inland Mouse Pseudomys hermannsburgensis Despite earlier contentions of the exclusive distribution and the Delicate Mouse P. delicatulus are two closely allied patterns of these two species, evidence exists for sympatry members of the largest genus of Australian rodents (Watts between P. hermannsburgensis and P. delicatulus in Western and Aslin 1981). Currently 22 species are recognised in Australia (How et al. 1991) and the Northern Territory the genus Pseudomys (Cole and Woinarski in press), (J. Cole pers. comm. 2002, Northern Territory though the taxonomy of this large group has variably been Department of Infrastructure, Planning and considered “a repository for species hard to classify” Environment). In Western Australia, both were trapped (Watts and Aslin 1981). Taxonomic reassessment of the together in three sites at the Abydos-Woodstock Reserve, group is ongoing (Breed and Aplin 1995; Breed 1996; F. in very low open Eucalyptus and Acacia woodland, with Ford, pers. comm. 2002, James Cook University). Triodia spp. ground cover and sandy soils (How et al. Pseudomys hermannsburgensis and P.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experimental Investigation of Differential Recovery of Native Rodent
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 001–030 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(1).2019.001-030 An experimental investigation of differential recovery of native rodent remains from Australian palaeontological and archaeological deposits Alexander Baynes1*, Cassia J. Piper2,3 and Kailah M. Thorn2,4 1 Research Associate, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. 2 School of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. 3 Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. 4 College of Science & Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia. * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – Quaternary palaeontologists are often asked to identify and interpret faunal remains from archaeological excavations. It is therefore vital that both palaeontologists and archaeologists understand the limitations imposed by recovery methods, especially sieves. Fossil small mammals, particularly rodents, in Australian archaeological deposits are very significant sources of palaeoenvironmental information. Over the last half century, recovery techniques used by archaeologists in Australia have ranged from dry screening with 10 mm sieves to wet screening with nested sieves graded down to 1 mm. Nested 6 and 3 mm sieves have been a popular combination. Experimental investigations, using owl-accumulated mammal remains from two caves, show that sieves of 2 or even 3 mm (the metric equivalent of 1/8th inch) are fine enough to recover most of the dissociated complete jaw bones used to identify Australian native rodents (all Muridae). But they fail to retain first molar teeth that have become dissociated from the jaws by pre-depositional fragmentation, predator digestion or damage during excavation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia, 2009
    Ethiopia trip report, February-March and May 2009 VLADIMIR DINETS (written in February 2016) For a mammalwatcher, Ethiopia is one of the most interesting countries in the world: it has very high mammalian diversity and lots of endemics. It is also poorly explored, with new species of small mammals described every year and new large mammals still discovered occasionally. This means that there is always a chance that you’ll find something new, but it also means that identifying what you see can be very difficult or impossible. I think all larger mammals and bats mentioned below were identified correctly, but I’m still unsure about some shrews and particularly rodents. There are also numerous unsettled taxonomic issues with Ethiopian mammals; I tried to update the taxonomy as well as I could. Travel in Ethiopia isn’t easy or cheap, but it’s totally worth the trouble, and the intensity of cultural experience is unparalleled, although many visitors find it to be a bit too much. The country is catastrophically overpopulated, particularly the fertile highlands. Parks and reserves range from existing only on paper to being relatively well protected, but all of them generate very little income and are deeply hated by the local population; armed conflicts over grazing restrictions are common. I’ve been in Ethiopia three times. In 2005 I got stuck there for a few days due to an airport closure, but had no money at all, couldn’t get out of Addis Ababa, and saw only one bat. In 2009 I went there to study crocodile behavior, spent a few days in Addis arranging special-use permits for national parks, hired a car, traveled to Omo Delta at the northern tip of Lake Turkana, survived ten days of studying crocodiles there, and went to Moyale to meet my volunteers Alexander Bernstein and Sarit Reizin who were coming from Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • On Mammalian Sperm Dimensions J
    On mammalian sperm dimensions J. M. Cummins and P. F. Woodall Reproductive Biology Group, Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland4067, Australia Summary. Data on linear sperm dimensions in mammals are presented. There is infor- mation on a total of 284 species, representing 6\m=.\2%of all species; 17\m=.\2%of all genera and 49\m=.\2%of all families have some representation, with quantitative information missing only from the orders Dermoptera, Pholidota, Sirenia and Tubulidentata. In general, sperm size is inverse to body mass (except for the Chiroptera), so that the smallest known spermatozoa are amongst those of artiodactyls and the largest are amongst those of marsupials. Most variations are due to differences in the lengths of midpiece and principal piece, with head lengths relatively uniform throughout the mammals. Introduction There is increasing interest in comparative studies of gametes both from the phylogenetic viewpoint (Afzelius, 1983) and also in the analysis of the evolution of sexual reproduction and anisogamy (Bell, 1982; Parker, 1982). This work emerged as part of a review of the relationship between sperm size and body mass in mammals (Cummins, 1983), in which lack of space precluded the inclusion of raw data. In publishing this catalogue of sperm dimensions we wish to rectify this defect, and to provide a reference point for, and stimulus to, further quantitative work while obviating the need for laborious compilation of raw data. Some aspects of the material presented previously (Cummins, 1983) have been re-analysed in the light of new data. Materials and Methods This catalogue of sperm dimensions has been built up from cited measurements, from personal observations and from communication with other scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pseudomys Australis) in Arid Landscapes
    Understanding the characteristics and role of refuges in the persistence of the plains mouse (Pseudomys australis) in arid landscapes Lauren Ivy Young A thesis submitted to fulfil requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Science The University of Sydney 2018 Photograph on title page: Pseudomys australis in the cracking clay by Alistair Stewart. Declaration of originality This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Signature Lauren Ivy Young Date: 25 May 2018 i Contents Table of Figures .............................................................................................................................. v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... viii Candidate contribution to manuscripts ........................................................................................... x Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ xi Thesis Abstract............................................................................................................................. xiii Chapter 1. General Introduction ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]