DOCSLIB.ORG

For the Proposed Township Establishment of Onyuulaye Proper and Onyuulaye Extension 1 in Onyuulaye Settlement in Onyuulaye Constituency, Oshikoto Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For the Proposed Township Establishment of Onyuulaye Proper and Onyuulaye Extension 1 in Onyuulaye Settlement in Onyuulaye Constituency, Oshikoto Region FOR THE PROPOSED TOWNSHIP ESTABLISHMENT OF ONYUULAYE PROPER AND ONYUULAYE EXTENSION 1 IN ONYUULAYE SETTLEMENT IN ONYUULAYE CONSTITUENCY, OSHIKOTO REGION July 2020 Prepared by: Prepared for: NGHIVELWA PLANNING CONSULTANTS OSHIKOTOREGIONAL COUNCIL P.O. Box 40900 P. O. Box 19247 Ausspannplatz Omuthiya CEL: +264 85 323 2230 TEL: +264 65 244800 E-MAIL: [email protected] EMAIL: [email protected] 1 Prepareres of the Environmental Impact Assessment Name of representative of the Education qualifications Professional affiliations EAP Nghivelwashisho Ndakunda B –tech TRP NAITRP, NCTRP Elina SP Vakuwile B-tech Environmental Environmental Scientist Management (EAPAN Member) See attached resumes Client Name Position/ Role Address Oshikoto Regional Oshikoto Regional Council P. O Box 19247 Council (Proponent) Omuthiya LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS TERMS DEFINITION EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan DEA Department of Environmental Affairs PPPPs Projects, Plans, Programmes and Policies NDC Namibia Development Consultants SANS South African National Standards I&APs Interested and Affected Parties PM Particulate Matter 2 Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Project Overview .................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Terms of Reference ............................................................................................. 6 1.4 Report Content ..................................................................................................... 7 1.5 DETAILS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER ........... 9 2. EIA METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Establishment of the environmental baseline ....................................................... 9 2.2 Impact analysis .................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Impacts mitigation ............................................................................................. 10 2.4 Review of alternatives ........................................................................................ 10 2.5 Public Participation Process (PPP) .................................................................... 10 3. POLICY AND OTHER RELEVANT LEGISLATIONS ............................................... 11 4. NEED AND DESIRABILITY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ................................ 14 5. SCOPE OF THE EIA ................................................................................................ 14 6. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY .................................................... 15 6.1 Proposed location and land ownership .............................................................. 16 6.2 Ownership .......................................................................................................... 16 6.3 Description of the site ......................................................................................... 17 6.4 Photographic History .......................................................................................... 17 1. Typical vegetation condition of the proposed site............................................... 17 2. The D3630 Crossing the site .............................................................................. 19 2. Typical topography of the site; ........................................................................... 19 6.5 Description of the proposed project .................................................................... 20 6.6 Proposed Project Activities ................................................................................ 20 6.7 Engineering Services ......................................................................................... 21 6.7.1 Bulk Infrastructure ....................................................................................... 21 6.7.2 Blasting ........................................................................................................ 22 6.8 Phases of the project ........................................................................................ 23 6.8.1 Activities during the Construction Phase ..................................................... 23 3 6.8.2 Activities during the operation and maintenance phase .............................. 24 6.8.3 Activities at the decommissioning phase ..................................................... 24 7. BASELINE DATA ..................................................................................................... 25 7.1 Locality and Surrounding Land Use .................................................................. 25 7.2 Climate and Temperature .................................................................................. 25 7.3 Geology, Topography and drainage ................................................................... 25 7.4 Hydrology ........................................................................................................... 26 7.5 Vegetation .......................................................................................................... 26 7.6 Soils ................................................................................................................... 26 7.7 Fauna ................................................................................................................. 26 7.8 Flora ................................................................................................................... 27 8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................... 27 8.1 Demographics .................................................................................................... 27 8.2 Economic activities ............................................................................................. 27 8.3 Education Profile ............................................................................................... 28 8.4 Employment Opportunities ................................................................................. 28 8.5 Income .............................................................................................................. 29 8.6 Health Profile ..................................................................................................... 29 8.7 Immigration ........................................................................................................ 29 8.8 Acquisition .......................................................................................................... 30 8.9 Tourism .............................................................................................................. 30 8.10 Amenities ....................................................................................................... 30 9. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................. 31 9.1 Alternative Site ................................................................................................... 31 9.2 The “No Project” Alternative ............................................................................... 32 10. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS (PPP) ........................................................ 33 10.1 Aim for Public Participation Process (PPP) ..................................................... 33 10.2 Compilation of stakeholder database .............................................................. 33 10.3 Background Information Document ................................................................. 34 10.4 Notification of I&Aps ........................................................................................ 34 10.5 Advertisement ................................................................................................. 34 4 10.6 Notice Board ................................................................................................... 35 10.7 Public Meeting ................................................................................................ 35 10.8 Issues raised by interested and affected parties ............................................. 36 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................................... 36 11.1 Impacts Associated with Construction Phase ................................................. 40 11.2 Impacts Associated with Operational Phase ................................................... 49 11.5 Impacts Associated with Decommissioning Phase ......................................... 54 12. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 54 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 55 List of Tables Table 1:Relevant legislation……………………………………………………………………11 Table 2: Erf Table for Onyuulaye Proper…………………………………………………..….20 Table 3: Erf Table for Onyuulaye Extension 1…………………………………………...……21 Table 4: Assessment and Rating Severity…………………………………………………....36 Table 5: Assessment and Rating of Duration…………………………………………………37 Table 6: Assessment and Rating of Extent……………………………………………………37 Table 7: Determination of consequences………………………………………………….….37
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of the Region Address by Honourable Penda Ya Ndakolo Regional Governor of Oshikoto Region Date: 17 July 2020 Time: 10H00 V
    STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS JULY 2020 OSHIKOTO REGION OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL GOVERNOR Tel: (065) 244800 P O Box 19247 Fax: (065) 244879 OMUTHIYA STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS BY HONOURABLE PENDA YA NDAKOLO REGIONAL GOVERNOR OF OSHIKOTO REGION DATE: 17 JULY 2020 TIME: 10H00 VENUE: OMUTHIYA ELCIN CHURCH OSHIKOTO REGION 1 | P a g e STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS JULY 2020 Director of Ceremonies Tatekulu Filemon Shuumbwa, Omukwaniilwa Gwelelo Lyandonga Hai-//Om Traditional Authority Honourable Samuel Shivute, Chairperson of the Oshikoto Regional Council Honourable Regional Councilors Your Worship the Mayors of Tsumeb Municipality, Omuthiya and Oniipa Town Councils Local Authority Councilors Mr. Frans Enkali, Chief Regional Officer, Oshikoto Regional Council All Chief Executive Officers Senior Government Officials Traditional Councillors Commissioner Armas Shivute, NAMPOL Regional Commander, Oshikoto Region Commissioner Leonard Mahundu, Officer in Charge, E. Shikongo Correctional Services Regional Heads of various Ministries & Institutions in the Region Comrade Armas Amukwiyu, SWAPO Party Regional Coordinator for Oshikoto Veterans of the Liberation Struggle Captains of Industries Traditional and Community Leaders Spiritual Leaders 2 | P a g e STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS JULY 2020 Distinguished Invited Guests Staff members of both the Office of the Governor and Oshikoto Regional Council Members of the Media Fellow Namibians As part of the constitutional mandate, I am delighted, honored and privileged to present the socio-economic development aspects of the region for the period 2019/2020. It is officially called as State of the Region Address (SORA). I thank you all Honorable Members, Traditional Authorities, Chief Regional Officer, Senior Government Officials, Staff members and general public for your presence here during this unprecedented times of Covid-19.
    [Show full text]
  • OMUTHIYA NEWSLETTER.Cdr
    OMUTHIYA TOWN COUNCIL MESSAGE TO POTENTIAL INVESTORS COUNCIL GATHERS INFORMAL TRADERS TOURISM ESTABLISHMENT IN OMUTHIYA Omuthiya Newsash OMUTHIYA TOWN COUNCIL Preface I am grateful for this opportunity to present this reading to the people of Omuthiya in particular and Namibia in general, while we are still early in the year 2017. The Council is currently at the budgeting period for 2017/18 nancial year. Therefore, I must utilize this platform to inform you of this opportunity and request you to assist us by bringing forth some considerations that you might wish council to look at. We do not want to plan in isolation henceforth, I would Finally, I wish to shed light on the matter like to humbly request you during our discussion to open of compensation which played a major up and assist the Council with the budget formulation. role during Council Public Meetings last I believe you have brilliant ideas with you therefore so, year. I would hereby like to inform you bring those ideas forward and assist in developing your that, council has forwarded a request town. for intervention to our line Minister for those who were compensated on the However, as you may all be aware, the economic condition for our country is quite unfavourable. Therefore, old policy as promised during our I advice that you should be considerate of this economic meeting last year, therefore let us be condition and come up only with activities and projects patient and wait for the outcome. that can be nancially achieved and is of the pressing nature. The suggested ideas would then be weighed and repriotised depending on the affordability.
    [Show full text]
  • I~~I~ E a FD-992A-~N ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rte of the REPUBLIC of NAMIBIA
    Date Printed: 12/31/2008 JTS Box Number: lFES 14 Tab Number: 30 Document Title: GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA, R2,BO - NO 473, NO 25 Document Date: 1992 Document Country: NAM Document Language: ENG lFES ID: EL00103 F - B~I~~I~ E A FD-992A-~n ~II~I~I~I~~ GOVERNMENT GAZE'rtE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA R2,80 WINDHOEK - I September 1992 No. 473 CONTENTS Page PROCLAMATION No. 25 Establishment of the boundaries of constituencies in Namibia ........ PROCLAMATION by the PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA No. 25 1992 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES IN NAMIBIA Under the powers vested in me by section 4(2)( a) of the Regional Councils Act, 1992 (Act 22 of 1992), I hereby make known the boundaries of constituencies which have been fixed by the Delimitation Commission under the provisions of Article 106(1) of the Namibian Constitution in respect of the regions referred to in Proclamation 6 of 1992. - Given under my Hand and the Seal of the RepUblic of Namibia at Windhoek this 29th day of August, One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety-two. Sam Nujoma President BY ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT-IN-CABINET F Clifton White Resource Center International Foundation for Election Systems 2 Government Gazette I September 1992 No. 473 SCHEDULE BOUNDARIES OF CONSTITUENCIES REGION NO. I: KUNENE REGION compnsmg: Ruacana Constituency This Constituency is bounded on the north by the middle of the Kunene River from the said river's mouth upstream to the Ruacana Falls whence the boundary conforms with the demarcated international straight line east­ wards to Boundary Beacon 5; thence the boundary turns southwards and coincides with the straight line boundary common to the Kunene and Omusati Regions as far as line of latitude 18° S; thence along this line of latitude westwards to the Atlantic Ocean; thence along the line of the coast in a general northerly direction to the mouth of the Kunene River.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Country Operational Plan (COP) 2020 Strategic Direction Summary 10 March 2020
    Namibia Country Operational Plan (COP) 2020 Strategic Direction Summary 10 March 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Updates to Program Context 2.1 Summary statistics, disease burden, and country profile 2.2 New Activities and Areas of Focus for COP20, Including Focus on Client Retention 2.3 Investment profile 2.4 National sustainability profile update 2.5 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to disease burden 2.6 Stakeholder engagement 3.0 Geographic and population prioritization 4.0 Client-centered Program Activities for Epidemic Control 4.1 Finding the missing, getting them on treatment 4.2 Retaining clients on treatment and ensuring viral suppression 4.3 Prevention, specifically detailing programs for priority programming 4.4 Additional country-specific priorities listed in the planning level letter 4.5 Commodities 4.6 Collaboration, Integration, and Monitoring 4.7 Targets for scale-up locations and populations 4.8 Cervical Cancer Programs 4.9 Viral Load and Early Infant Diagnosis Optimization 5.0 Program Support Necessary to Achieve Sustained Epidemic Control 6.0 USG Management, Operations and Staffing Plan to Achieve Stated Goals Appendix A - Prioritization Appendix B - Budget Profile and Resource Projections Appendix C - Tables and Systems Investments for Section 6.0 Appendix D – Minimum Program Requirements 2 | P a g e Abbreviations and Acronyms AGYW Adolescent Girls and Young Women (aged 15-24) ANC Antenatal Clinic APR Annual Progress Report ART Antiretroviral Therapy ARV Antiretroviral
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H2 Social Impact Assessment
    SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DUNDEE PRECIOUS METALS TSUMEB SMELTER EXPANSION PROJECT OSHIKOTO REGION NAMIBIA Originally prepared for SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia)(Pty) Ltd By Tony Barbour Dated January 2017 Tony Barbour ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 10 Firs Avenue, Claremont, 7708, South Africa (Tel) +27-21-761 2355 - (Fax) +27-21-797 1361 - (Cell) +2782 600 8266 (E-Mail) [email protected] 2019 update By SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd (SLR) was appointed by Dundee Precious Metals as the lead consultant to manage the Amendment Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process for the proposed expansion of the existing Tsumeb smelter located in the town of Tsumeb, in the Oshikoto Region in northern Namibia. Tony Barbour Environmental Consulting was appointed by SLR to undertake a specialist Social Impact Assessment (SIA) as part of the EIA process. Following a 2017 public review, the 2017 version of the report has been updated by SLR. This updated report thus contains the findings of the SIA undertaken as part of the Assessment Phase of the EIA process and additional information from follow-up consultation and baseline sources. APPROACH TO THE STUDY The approach to the SIA study is based on South Africa’s Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment (February 2007). These guidelines are based on international best practice. The key activities
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact Assessment for Dundee Precious Metals Tsumeb Smelter Expansion Project Oshikoto Region Namibia
    SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DUNDEE PRECIOUS METALS TSUMEB SMELTER EXPANSION PROJECT OSHIKOTO REGION NAMIBIA February 2017 Prepared for SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia)(Pty) Ltd By Tony Barbour Tony Barbour ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 10 Firs Avenue, Claremont, 7708, South Africa (Tel) +27-21-761 2355 - (Fax) +27-21-797 1361 - (Cell) +2782 600 8266 (E-Mail) [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd (SLR) was appointed by Dundee Precious Metals as the lead consultant to manage the Amendment Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process for the proposed expansion of the existing Tsumeb smelter located in the town of Tsumeb, in the Oshikoto Region in northern Namibia. Tony Barbour Environmental Consulting was appointed by SLR to undertake a specialist Social Impact Assessment (SIA) as part of the EIA process. This report contains the findings of the SIA undertaken as part of the Assessment Phase of the EIA process. APPROACH TO THE STUDY The approach to the SIA study is based on the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment (February 2007). These guidelines are based on international best practice. The key activities in the SIA process embodied in the guidelines include: • Describing and obtaining an understanding of the proposed intervention (type, scale, location), the settlements and communities likely to be affected by the proposed project; • Collecting baseline data on the current social and economic environment; • Identifying the key potential social issues associated with the proposed project. This requires a site visit to the area and consultation with affected individuals and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation of Omusati and Oshana Regions, Central- Northern Namibia © University of Pretoria
    The vegetation of Omusati and Oshana Regions, central- northern Namibia by FRANSISKA NDIITEELA KANGOMBE Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE in the Department of Plant ScienceFaculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria December 2010 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. G.J. Bredenkamp Co-supervisor: Mr. B.J. Strohbach © University of Pretoria ABSTRACT The vegetation of Omusati and Oshana Regions, central-northern Namibia by FRANSISKA NDIITEELA KANGOMBE Supervisor: Prof. Dr. G.J. Bredenkamp Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE in the Department of Plant Science, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria December 2010 Central-northern Namibia is home to an approximate 43% of the country’s population, a large proportion of which still depends directly on natural resources for their livelihoods. The main land use in this area is agro-silvo-pastoralism i.e. a combination of subsistence farming and silvi-culture. The few phytosociological and biodiversity data available in Namibia are not substantial to motivate environmental management and sustainable utilization of the country’s natural wealth. The Vegetation Survey Project of Namibia coupled with the BIOTA southern Africa Project therefore share a common goal of re-classifying Namibian vegetation by building on the Preliminary Vegetation Map of Namibia of 1971 and the Homogenous Framing Areas Report of 1979. The vegetation of Omusati and Oshana regions which are situated in the Mopanne Savanna in central-northern Namibia was classified and described by subjecting 415 relevés to multivariate analysis i.e. classification and ordination. The geographical distribution of these community types was established by supervised classification of satellite data of the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gaze1=J'e. Republic of Namibia
    GOVERNMENT GAZE1=J'E. OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA R0,60 WI NDHOEK - 14 December 1992 No. 550 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 182 Administrative Directive: Certain guidelines for Government Ministers and Public Servants ........................................................ ........................................................... Government Notice OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER No. 182 1992 AD MINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE: CERTAIN GUIDELINES FOR GOVERNMENT MINISTERS AND P UBLIC SERVANTS The following Administrative Directive (No. 2 of 1992) was issued by the Right Honourable Prime Minister on 24 November 1992 to Government Ministers and Public Servants: 2 Government Gazette 14 December 1992 No. 550 Administrative Directive No. 2/1992 24 November 1992 1. Preparation of Cabinet Agenda Of late, the Prime Minister has noticed that some of the Cabinet Memoranda referred to the Cabinet Office for placement on Cabinet Agenda do not conform to the requirements set out in the Cabinet Handbook. As a result, there is marked increase in the incidence of issues referred back from the Cabinet. In order to avoid such instances, all Permanent Secretaries should - ensure that Cabinet Memoranda submitted to the Cabinet Office are prepared in conformity with the provisions set out in the Cabinet Handbook. Specifically, the Permanent Secretaries should ensure that: 1. Cabinet Memoranda are prepared after the necessary consultation with the various ministries or offices affected by or having an interest in the issues being referred to the Cabinet for decision; 2. the Memoranda are unambiguous. They must be very specific as to the Cabinet decisions being sought. This requires that the Memoranda must contain specific recommendations -- it is not sufficient merely to present a problem to the Cabinet for a decision without proposing course of action or actions; and - 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Watch
    ProducedElection by the Institute for Public Policy Research W (IPPR)atch Issue No. 3 2015 KNOW YOUR COUNTRY n November 27th, 2015, registered Namibian voters will teen regions and their constituencies. region for which they have been established, advising the head to the polls to cast their votes in the Local Author- During the Regional Council elections, “each constitu- line Minister on regional development concerns; and assist- ityO and Regional Council elections. The election of leaders at ency shall elect one member to the Regional Council for the ing the local authorities situated within the region. this level has been viewed as a means of bringing govern- region in which it is situated”1 through a ‘First Past the Post With the 2014 amendments to the Constitution, the ment closer to the people, by focusing on creating develop- system. For example, the Hardap Regional Council will be National Council – known as the House of Review because it ment, and delivering essential services. This bulletin provides made up of eight members – one from each of its constituen- considers all bills passed in the National Assembly – will now an overview of the two elections, and a graphic illustration cies (Gibeon, Mariental Rural, Mariental Urban, Rehoboth be made up of 42 members – 3 members from each Regional (see the centre-spread) of all the 14 regions and 121 constitu- Rural, Rehoboth East Urban, Rehoboth West Urban, Aranos Council (up from 2 members per Regional Council previ- encies in Namibia. and Daweb). The smallest Regional Council will be that of ously). “The National Council’s members are the only MPs the Kavango East region, made up of six constituencies, and who are elected to represent territorial constituencies and are KNOW YOUR REGIONS & CONSTITUENCIES the largest will be those of the Ohangwena and Omusati therefore expected to raise regional concerns during debates Following the work of the Fourth Delimitation Commis- regions – each made up of 12 constituencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Kunene, Oshana and Oshikoto Regions
    Chapter 6 Kunene, Oshana and Oshikoto Regions By Ute Dieckmann Farm Six – a Hai||om San settlement in Oshikoto Region 6.1 General background In the 19th century and early 20th century, the Hai||om San as an ethnic group lived in the region stretching from the area then known as Owamboland to present-day Etosha, Grootfontein, Tsumeb, Otavi, Outjo and Otjiwarongo (Dieckmann 2007b: 35-36) (see map next page). Today the Hai||om are concentrated in parts of Kunene, Oshikoto and Oshana Regions, constituting the majority San population of these regions, therefore these three regions are dealt with in a single chapter. Estimations of the number of Hai||om in Namibia vary. Budack’s estimate in 1980 was 11 000 (see Widlok 1999: 23), and the census of 1991 (the latest available data on Hai||om) found 7 506 Hai||om speakers (see Widlok 1999: 19). However, the Hai||om language is closely related to Nama/Damara (also of the Khoekhoegowab language family), and our study found that many Hai||om, in response to the census question of “main language spoken at home”, had stated that it was “Nama/Damara”. Chapter 6: Kunene, Oshana and Oshikoto Regions 173 The parts of Kunene, Oshana and Oshikoto Regions inhabited by Hai||om Source: LAC, MLR and NSA. Map design: Florian Fennert A Hai||om family collecting firewood near Tsintsabis in Oshikoto Region 174 “Scraping the Pot”: San in Namibia Two Decades After Independence 6.1.1 Kunene Region Kunene Region is situated in the north-west corner of Namibia. In terms of size it is the country’s second-largest region (approximately 13.9% of Namibia’s total land area), covering an area of about 115 260 km2 (National Planning Commission (NPC) 2012b: 43).
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Namibia Northern Crop and Livestock Development Master Plan Study Final Report Volume-Ii Main Report
    Republic of Namibia Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA NORTHERN CROP AND LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN STUDY FINAL REPORT VOLUME-II MAIN REPORT June 2017 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. RD JR 17-036 Republic of Namibia Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA NORTHERN CROP AND LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN STUDY FINAL REPORT VOLUME-II MAIN REPORT June 2017 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. Oshikango N Olushanja dam Okongo Outapi Ondobe Endola Eenhana ■ ■ Etayi ■ Etunda ■ ■ Epembe Tsandi Ohangwena region ★ Oshakati ■ ■ Okatana Onayena Okahao ■ ■ Ondangwa ■ Ongwediva ■ Oshakati-west Outapi ■ Uukuwiyu ■ Onyaanya Oshana region Oshikoto region University of Namibia Omuntele ■ Omuthiya Oshikango campus ■ ■ (SATREPS main hub) Uvudhiya Omuthiya ■ King Kauluma Omusati region Legend Tsumeb State border Seasonal wetland Constituency border State capital Main city ■ Pilot Site Dam ★ University 20°W ０°E 20°E ４０°E ANGOLA Katima Mulilo Ondangwa Oshakati 20°N Rundu 20°N African continent Etosha Pon ０° Grootfontein ０° BOTSWANA Otjiwarongo Namibia Namib Desert 20°S Legend 20°S Project area Road 20°W ０°E 20°E ４０°E Okahandja River, Lake KEY MAP State border WINDHOEK Walvis Bay Capital Namib Desert Main city Rehoboth South Atlantic Ocean N Keetmanshoop SOUTH AFRICA 0 100 200 300 400 km Northen Crop and Livestock Development Master Plan Study Area Map Main Rereport Photographs No.1 (Phase-1) The meeting for the 1st Steering Committee was held at Ms. Kasheeta, Director of DAPEES, opened the Ongwedive on September 22, 2014, inviting the meeting, and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transport by Honourable Erkki Nghimtina, Mp Ministe
    REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA MINISTRY OF WORKS AND TRANSPORT VOTE 24: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT BY HONOURABLE ERKKI NGHIMTINA, MP MINISTER OF WORKS AND TRANSPORT 25 March 2014 1 | P a g e Vote 24 Budget speech for the financial year 2014/2015 by Honourable Erkki Nghimtina Minister of Works and Transport Honourable Chairperson of the whole house Committee Honourable Members Let me thank the honorable members of this House for affording me the opportunity to present to you the programmes for the Department of Transport, Vote 24, in the Ministry of Works and Transport. Vote 24 is responsible for the oversight of the development of efficient and effective transport infrastructure which contributes to the promotion of the country’s economic development and social upliftment. Namibia is daunted by the formidable task of maintaining the roads and railway lines due to flood waters during rainy season. Easy mobility for the people and industry remains our focus therefore maintenance and proper management of these government assets is a must and needs to be preserved and intensified. Transport infrastructure and services remain crucial for generating economic growth, alleviating poverty, reducing the scourge of inequality and increasing domestic and international competitiveness. In financing transport infrastructure we are aware of Namibia’s economic and social characteristics including various demands made on tax based revenues. We, on the other hand, therefore welcome and encourage the willingness of the private sector to invest in transport infrastructure. I am confident that Namibian’s transport infrastructure can boost our prospect to flourish despite the world economic recessions. We therefore need to be more assertive to open up the existing and untapped markets 2 | P a g e through the provision of adequate and world-class transportation infrastructures.
    [Show full text]