Does the Nature of Science Influence College Students' Learning of Biological Evolution?: Wilbert Butler Jr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Does the Nature of Science Influence College Students' Learning of Biological Evolution?: Wilbert Butler Jr Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 Does the Nature of Science Influence College Students' Learning of Biological Evolution?: Wilbert Butler Jr. Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION DOES THE NATURE OF SCIENCE INFLUENCE COLLEGE STUDENTS‘ LEARNING OF BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION? By WILBERT BUTLER, JR. A Dissertation submitted to the School of Teacher Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2009 The members of the Committee approved the Dissertation of Wilbert Butler, Jr. defended on December 4, 2008. ________________________ Sherry Southerland Professor Directing Dissertation ________________________ Frederick Davis Outside Committee Member ________________________ Alejandro Gallard Committee Member ________________________ Jon Stallins Committee Member Approved: _________________________________________________________________ Walt Wager, Chair, School of Teacher Education The Graduate School has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii Dedicated to: My wife, my mother, and my sister iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Over the years, I have come to the realization that I have been blessed with many talents and for that I am thankful especially to God for what he has made possible. I would like to express my gratitude for my diligent committee members – Sherry Southerland, Frederick Davis, Alejandro Gallard, and Jon Stallins – for the role that they played in my professional growth and development as an aspiring educator. I appreciate the strengths and candor that each committee member exhibited in our discussions which helped me tremendously in the development and conducting of my research. My committee members were supportive in allowing me to be open with my ideas but firm on points important to maintaining the credibility of my study. I am especially thankful to my major professor for breaking bread with me and putting her foot down with diplomacy. Furthermore, I am forever thankful to God for placing three important women in my life. First to my wife, LaMonica, who with an open heart was very supportive and considerate of what I was trying to accomplish. I thank her for the meals, ideas and the love notes left on my pillow when I came to bed late. My sister and mom whom I talked with everyday were great sounding boards even when they pretended to understand and showing patience when I couldn‘t talk. Many thanks go out to my son, Austin, who never complained when I couldn‘t do something because of my studies. He never made me feel that I was neglecting him. Furthermore, I must thank the graduate students that I collaborated with as we ventured through school, and to Calandra Walker that proof-read, made corrections when I couldn‘t and helped me figure out options in Microsoft Word to get things done. And let me not forget Carol Zimmerman for setting up my classes for my research twice and TCC for helping me financially. Last but not least, my gratitude goes out to Felicia Moore Mensah for her support and iv inciting me to attend graduate school. Other supporters in their different ways were Frank Brown, Vera Mack, Donmetrie Clark, Kenya Thompkins, Leigh Brown, Brenda Jarmon, Dallas Williams, Eddy Stringer, Patricia Green-Powell, Joi Walker and the student participants. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ……….......................................................................................... xi List of Figures ................................................................................................ xii Abstract …….............................................................................................. xiii 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 Significance of the Study ............................................................................ 6 Research Questions ..................................................................................... 7 Limitations of the Study.............................................................................. 7 Definitions of Terms ................................................................................... 8 2. LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………………… 10 Introduction ................................................................................................ 10 What is Scientific Literacy? ........................................................................ 10 What is Understanding? .............................................................................. 12 Introducing the Nature of Science .............................................................. 13 Importance of Understanding the Nature of Science .................................. 14 Why do Students lack NOS Understanding? .............................................. 15 Research on NOS in the Post Secondary Setting ........................................ 17 Assessment of Students‘ Conceptions of the NOS ..................................... 22 Development, Use, and Assessment of NOS .............................................. 25 Introduction of Evolution ............................................................................ 26 Students‘ Understanding of Evolution ........................................................ 30 Research on Students‘ Understanding of Evolution ................................... 32 Role of NOS in the Understanding of Evolution ........................................ 33 vi Intersection of Knowledge, Belief and Acceptance .................................... 34 3. METHODOLOGY………………………………………………………… . 36 Methodological Approach .......................................................................... 36 Quasi-Experimental Design ........................................................................ 37 Setting ................................................................................................ 37 Participants ................................................................................................ 37 Benefits of Being a Teacher-Researcher .................................................... 38 Instruction/Activities Presented ................................................................. 39 Description of Instrumentation ................................................................... 44 Data Analysis .............................................................................................. 47 Steps to Ensure Rigor of Research .............................................................. 54 Steps for the Methodology .......................................................................... 54 Personal Perspective ................................................................................... 55 Limitations of Methodology ....................................................................... 56 4. QUANTITATIVE RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...................................... 58 Students‘ Conceptual Framework of Microevolution ................................ 58 Differences in Conceptions of Evolution between the NOS Rich and Implicit NOS Classes .................................................................. 58 Comparison of Change in Understanding of Evolution ............................. 59 Trends Observed in Analysis of CINS Data .............................................. 65 Students‘ Acceptance of Evolution ............................................................ 69 Summary ................................................................................................ 72 5. ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITATIVE DATA .............................................. 74 vii Use of Specific Conceptions of Evolution: Comparison of Students‘ Understanding of Evolution across Courses ............................................... 74 Comparison of Informed Conceptions of Evolution across each Course ................................................................................................ 79 Assessment of Students‘ Understanding of Evolution using a Biological Phenomenon .............................................................................. 82 Students‘ Understanding of the Nature of Science .................................... 84 Data from Course Writings ........................................................................ 85 Data from Interviews ................................................................................. 86 Data from a Survey of Students‘ Understanding of NOS and the VNOS-B ................................................................................................ 86 Summary Comparison of Change in Understanding ................................. 91 The Role of NOS in Understanding Evolution .......................................... 94 Summary ................................................................................................ 95 6. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATION ............................................................ 96 Assertion 1 ................................................................................................ 96 Assertion 2 ................................................................................................ 98 Assertion 3 ................................................................................................ 99 Assertion 4 ...............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 6-Stained Glass in Lancaster
    STAINED GLASS IN LANCASTER Lancaster Civic Society Leaflet 6 St Thomas, in Lancaster Priory by R.F. Ashmead of Abbott & Co (1966} The beauty of stained glass has been recognised since the Middle Ages and it is still popular. Lancaster had three notable stained-glass firms – Seward & Co, Shrigley & Hunt and Abbott & Co – which produced fine work from 1825 to 1996, relying on their artists and craftsmen. Their work The later nineteenth century was a good time for stained glass – new churches, hospitals, town halls, ocean liners, pubs and country houses – the firms’ work can be seen in all these. Shrigley and Hunt initially favoured a Pre-Raphaelite style, lighter in design and colour than its predecessors, strongly decorative, detailed, with realistic scenes and faces telling clear allegories and Biblical stories. Stronger colours were used in the 1880s. Their two main artists, Edward Holme Jewitt and Carl Almquist, had different styles, so widening the firm’s client base. They opened a studio in London to keep Almquist in the firm and to pick up on metropolitan shifts in taste. The firm also made decorative wall tiles. Abbott & Co followed these Late Victorian and Edwardian trends but also developed more modernist styles for interwar houses and in the 1960s. Both firms got contracts in association with the noted Lancaster architectural practice of Paley and Austin. Shrigley and Hunt used their London contacts to get work with Richard Norman Shaw and Alfred Waterhouse. Local magnates such as the Storeys and Williamsons of Lancaster and the brewing families of Boddington (Manchester) and Greenall (Warrington) also patronised them.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Significance
    KIRK OF ST NICHOLAS, ABERDEEN Statement of Significance prepared by HISTORY IN THE MAKING HERITAGE CONSULTANTS Aberdeen 2005 Contents Page (1) Introduction 2 (2) History 2 (3) Social significance 4 (4) Location 6 (5) Kirkyard 7 (6) Physical elements: (a) Architecture 7 (b) Archaeology 9 (7) Contents: (a) Historic timber-work and fittings 10 (b) Stained glass 11 (c) Effigies 12 (d) Wall-hangings, paintings 13 (e) Silver plate 14 (f) Organs 15 (g) Bells 15 (8) Documentary background 15 (9) Outline of the Mither Kirk Project 16 (10) Conclusion: summary of significance 17 1 (1) Introduction Although it is only one building, St Nicholas Kirk is a remarkably complex subject for survey. It is a notable ancient monument, which has grown and altered organically from the twelfth century to the present. But it has also been over all these centuries a central spiritual institution of Aberdeen. It therefore requires study, preservation and presentation, plus development in the context of today. The Mither Kirk Project is a broadly based scheme designed to achieve that development on a wide canvas. What follows below is a summary outline of significance, based on the present state of knowledge and research. The term ‘mother church’ (matrix ecclesia in Latin, mither kirk in Scots) was applied to this church in the middle ages. It indicated a church which, though not a cathedral, had superior status, which had other churches or chapels dependent on it and which had the authority to conduct baptisms. St Nicholas has been a significant institution since early times. (2) History The foundation date of the church is unknown, but must lie before 1157 when the first reference to it occurs in a papal document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reredos D2
    Te Reredos Unpicking its Symbolism and Histry Church buildings to some people are special or sacred places, the buildings of themselves and their contents bearing witness and testament to the faith of preceding generations. The Reredos of St James the Great church Daisy Hill is one such testament of faith. For approaching one hundred years it has played its part in telling the Easter story, however, in 2020 that was not to be COVID-19 caused all places of worship to be closed. No doubt the timing of closing the outer wings has changed over the last 96 years, however, in recent times on Monday of Holy Week the reredos would be partly close, leaving only the centre picture visible and then at the Maundy Thursday service they would be completely closed. Symbolically taking Jesus away from us and for some people creating a sense of the loss and bereavement that the disciples of Jesus must have experienced on the first Good Friday. When closed the plain doors reveal carved shields with a Christogram, the letters IHS, an ancient way of writing Jesus Christ and perhaps symbolically indicating he is still there. The creators of the reredos used the symbols of icon painters of the early church and we can unpick the symbolism which is full of loving support, the words “I am with you always” ( Mathew 28: 20) come to mind. The expansive gold background symbolises uncreated light - the pure light of heaven In the centre panel the creators of the reredos did not want to terrify the people of Daisy Hill with the gruesome physical reality of crucifixion, as Icon painters before them, they bring to us a spiritual reality expressed in symbols we can read.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Reports
    List by Owner EXETER, NH Land Building Parcel Style Living Owner~s Name Location Map Lot Unit Value Value Value Desc Area 1 CASS STREET LLC 1 CASS ST 63 274 91,600 284,700 376,300 4-7 Family 3,163 10 EPPING RD CONDO ASSOC 10 EPPING RD 63 38 MC 0 0 0 Condominium 0 100 HIGH ST CONDOMINIUM 100 HIGH ST 71 51 MC 0 0 0 Condominium 0 103 EPPING ROAD LLC 103 EPPING RD 55 70 105,900 102,400 208,300 Conventional 1,197 107 WATSON RD REALTY TRUST 109 WATSON RD 19 14 137,400 250,800 388,200 Cape Cod 1,977 11 COURT STREET LLC 11 COURT ST 72 158 221,900 840,000 1,061,900 Office Bldg 15,036 11 HEMLOCK ST EXETER NH 11 HEMLOCK ST 95 64 182 0 51,200 51,200 Manf Home DW 1,108 117 WATER ST PROPERTIES LLC 115 WATER ST 72 24 158,000 243,800 401,800 Store 3,504 120 EPPING ROAD INVESTMENT LLC 120 EPPING RD 55 7 286,500 129,200 415,700 Office Bldg 2,954 127 WATER STREET REALTY INC 127 WATER ST 72 22 158,000 206,500 364,500 Office Bldg 2,664 133 EPPING ROAD LLC 133 EPPING RD 55 64 103,800 170,000 273,800 Service Shops 5,465 14 BITTERSWEET LN CONDO ASSOC 14 BITTERSWEET LN 65 67 MC 0 0 0 Condominium 0 141-143 FRONT ST LLC 141-143 FRONT ST 73 198 71,900 168,800 240,700 Apartments 4,574 154 WATER STREET CO LLC 28 FRONT ST 72 160 210,200 197,200 407,400 Stores/Apt Com 3,740 156 EPPING ROAD LLC 156 EPPING RD 47 1 1 719,400 1,397,400 2,116,800 Auto Sales Rpr 19,578 158 EPPING ROAD LLC 158 EPPING RD 47 1 2 646,900 971,500 1,618,400 Auto Sales Rpr 12,187 16 HALL PLACE LLC 16 HALL PL 72 49 MC 0 0 0 Condominium 0 16 HALL PLACE LLC 16 HALL PLACE #2 72 49 2 0 247,000 247,000
    [Show full text]
  • MANCHESTER GROUP of the VICTORIAN SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Summer 2021
    MANCHESTER GROUP OF THE VICTORIAN SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Summer 2021 THE MANCHESTER GROUP OF THE VICTORIAN SOCIETY SUMMER 2021 | 1 CONTENTS 3 RAYMOND UNWIN AND THE LAKE DISTRICT Richard Fletcher 6 J E C CARR, METALWORKER AND STAINED-GLASS ARTIST Richard Fletcher 8 "THE RED KING," 162 BURY NEW ROAD, WHITEFIELD Neil Darlington 10 NEW WORK BY JOSEPH HANSOM: FACT OR FICTION? The conundrum of the triangular pediment Penny Harris 13 PLANS BY PHILIP NUNN, ARCHITECT Richard Bond 16 FRENCH NINETEENTH CENTURY MILL ARCHITECTURE? Neil Darlington 18 MANCHESTER GROUP MATTERS COVER A long since disappeared view of the apsidal east end of the Church of the Holy Name photographed on a wet day in 1966 The views expressed within this publication are those of the authors concerned and not necessarily those of the Manchester Group of the Victorian Society. © Please note that articles published in this newsletter are copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without the consent of the author concerned. THE MANCHESTER GROUP OF THE VICTORIAN SOCIETY SUMMER 2021 | 2 RAYMOND UNWIN AND THE LAKE DISTRICT Richard Fletcher The architect and town planner, Raymond Unwin, died on 28 June 1940 at the home of his daughter in Lyme, Connecticut, USA. His body was brought back to England, but instead of being buried in Hampstead where he and his wife had lived for over 30 years, his final resting place was the churchyard of St Kentigern in Crosthwaite, near Keswick. At first sight, this might seem a strange choice, especially as Unwin and his business partner Barry Parker did very little work in the Lake District.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday 5Th & Saturday 6Th March 2021
    FINE & DECORATIVE ARTS Friday 5th & Saturday 6th March 2021 FINE AND DECORATIVE ARTS To be held at: Davies House, Davies Road, Evesham, Worcestershire WR11 1YZ FRIDAY 5TH MARCH SATURDAY 6TH MARCH Day of the Sale Auction scheduled to start at 10am with live bidding on internet bidding platforms; telephone bids and commission bids will also be accepted. You will need to be registered before the sale. SPECIALISTS George Kingham John Keightley Allison White David Pregun Director Senior Specialist and Cataloguer Auctioneer, Valuer and Photographer Jewellery and Watches Mark Oliver Geoff Shepherd Steven Bruce Consultant Decorative Arts Specialist Office Manager Consultant Live internet bidding is available on www.the-saleroom.com, www.invaluable.com, www.easyliveauction.com, www.liveauctioneers.com and www.drouot.com together with fully illustrated catalogue. Catalogue £10.00 (£12.00 by post) Kingham & Orme Auctioneers Ltd (Collection Address) Davies House, Davies Road, Evesham, Worcestershire, WR11 1YZ NB. Please telephone to arrange collection. Telephone: 01386 244224 Mobile: 07976 919836 Email: [email protected] Website: www.kinghamandorme.com 2 MAP AND DIRECTIONS Our auction site is based in the market town of Evesham just north of the Cotswolds. By Car We are centrally located in reach of motorways the M5, M4, M40, M42, a short way from the A44 By Rail Evesham’s train station is less than two miles from the auction site By Plane The nearest International Airports are Birmingham, 45 miles and Heathrow, 90 miles DELIVERY SERVICES FOR BUYERS We offer an in house packing service for most items and paintings up to 110cm x 80cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrow Hill Village
    9. The Parish Church of St Andrew The Parish Church of St Andrew the Apostle is unique in that Barrow Hill Village it was the first building ever to be designed by Sir Raymond Unwin, working as an architect, and the first building to be completed in partnership with Barry Parker. The building is highly regarded, nationally, as being of major architectural The Blocks 2. The Dining Hall significance and as an irreplaceable part of the country’s 1. The building opened on Easter Monday, 1864, as a Dining cultural heritage. Richard Barrow advertised for craftsmen to Hall, where workers could get a good mid-day meal for This simple little church, in the Arts and Crafts style, opened in begin building the first 100 cottages for his less than 6d. It had a library and reading room. After the 1895 and has five stained glass windows by Shrigley and Hunt, workmen in 1853. The builder was Matthew First World War, Charles Paxton Markham, the Managing The School and another window by William Morris and Co, as well as a Marriott of Staveley. 7. Director of the Staveley Coal and Iron Company, gave the Richard Barrow’s biggest, and most expensive project, was magnificent, fully restored Holt pipe organ which was built for There were 3 houses in each block and they all building to the “inhabitants of Barrow Hill” as a Peace Hall the iconic Church of England Mission Church and National the original Church in the school in 1856. Where do you think had large gardens. (Memorial Club).
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster St. John the Evangelist
    your church tour A thousand years of English history awaits you The Churches Conservation Trust is the national charity protecting historic churches at risk. We’ve saved over 340 beautiful buildings which attract more than a million visitors a year. With our help and with your support they are kept open and in use – living once again at the heart of their communities. About St John’s Church Built in 1754-55 by Henry Sephton, as a chapel of ease for Lancaster Priory, St John the Evangelist is a church of five bays and semicircular apse in ashlar sandstone under a slate roof. The nave has galleries to the north and south, with an organ case at the west end in the style of Robert Adam, by Gillows c. 1785. The church was remodelled by John Harrison, after a bequest from Thomas Bowes, who added tower and spire in 1784. Harrison also built the Skerton bridge over the river Lune, and parts of Lancaster Castle. The tower is in three stages, the second of which carries a clock; the third stage the bells. The tower is topped with a rotunda and drum with Access spirelet. The south porch was built in 1874, the apse, side Due to their age, historic church floors can be uneven and worn chapel and vestry were added in 1920. The interior was and lighting can be low level. Please take care, especially in wet Church of restored in 1950 by Sir Albert Richardson. The church is weather when floors can be slippery. listed Grade II* and, due to declining congregation was closed in 1981 and vested into the care of The Churches Help us do more Conservation Trust in 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Furness and South Lakeland War Memorials Transcript
    SOUTH LAKELAND War Memorials Names Lists GRASMERE CHURCH- WW1 & WW2-TRANSCRIPTION IN MEMORIAM/1914-1918/PRO PATRIA/THEIR NAME/LIVETH/FOR/EVERMORE LEFT HAND SIDE WW1 EDWARD SETON CHANCE, LT-COLONEL/2ND DRAGOON GUARDS 1918 MAY 29 AUBONE CHARLES CAMPBELL DSO/ MAJOR, 2ND K.O.S.B. 1918 APRIL 3 JOHN GORDON DUTTON MC WITH BAR/ MAJOR, R.F.A. 1918 APR 5 HERO OSWALD HILLERNS, MAJOR/ R.F.A. TERRITORIAL FORCE 1917 APRIL 14 ANDREW FERGUSON CHANCE, CAPTAIN/ R.F.A. 1915 OCTOBER 3 FRANCIS RUDOLF DANSON, LIEUTENANT/ 1/4TH BATT CHESHIRE REGIMENT 1915 AUGUST 10 JOSHUA HARDISTY MM, SERGEANT/11TH BORDER REGIMENT 1916 NOVEMBER 1918 ALFRED MARSDEN, SERGEANT/ 8TH BORDER REGIMENT 1916 APRIL 8 THOMAS HENRY SANDERSON DCM MM/ SERGEANT, R.F.A. 1917 AUGUST 17 JAMES SMITH, SERGEANT, NORTHUMBERLAND/FUSILIERS 1919 FEBRUARY 5 GEORGE ROUTLEDGE WILSON/CORPORAL, K.O.S.B. 1918 JUNE 7 GEORGE EDWARD THOMPSON, LANCE/CORPORAL, 11TH BORDER RGT 1917 JULY 10 NELLIE TAYLOR, DRIVER, V.A.D. BRITISH/RED CROSS SOCIETY 1918 JUNE 27 WW2 JOHN FOSTER STOBBART PRIVATE/4TH BORDER RGT 1941 DECEMBER 5TH RIGHT HAND SIDE WW1 OF THE BORDER REGIMENT JOHN HERBERT BAISBROWN, PRIVATE/1ST BATTALION 1918 JANUARY 13 JOHN DIXON, PRIVATE 2ND BATTALION/1916 JULY 1 JOHN HARDISTY, PRIVATE 1ST BATTALION/1916 JULY 30 HENRY BOWNESS JOHNSON, PRIVATE/11TH BATTALION 1916 APRIL 6 FRED KENDALL, PRIVATE, 8TH BATTALION/1918 SEPTEMBER 4 WILLIAM WARWICK PEASCOD, PRIVATE/ 8TH BATTALION 1917 NOVEMBER 5 AND WILLIAM WILSON, PRIVATE, 6TH BATTALION/1916 SEPTEMBER 27 NOEL BAISBROWN, PRIVATE 14TH ROYAL/MONTREAL RIFLES C.E.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Stained and Painted Glass Janette Ray Booksellers, York, England
    Stained and Painted Glass Janette Ray Booksellers, York, England Janette Ray Booksellers, 8 Bootham, York YO30 7BL UK. Tel: +44 (0)1904 623088 email [email protected] STAINED AND PAINTED GLASS: CATALOGUE 16 Introduction: This catalogue is our first specialist list on aspects of stained and painted glass. It includes material on making glass, commentaries on glass in situ, including a selection of out of print volumes from Corpus Vitrearum, monographs on individual makers and a small group of items which comprise original designs for glass. It is designed to appeal to those who have a general interest in the subject alongside those with specific interests in periods or individual artists. We would particularly draw your attention to Christopher Whall’s rare promotional booklet for his own firm which has original photographs of items he made,(no 31 ) and other trade catalogues, the massive colour illustrated portfolio Vorbildliche Glasmalereien aus dem späten Mittelalter und der Renaissancezeit which records glass in pre First World War Germany (no 99), the original heraldic designs recorded by F C Eden at Aveley Belhus. (no 187) and the substantial collection of original material from Hardman’s in Birmingham when the company was under the jurisdiction of Patrick Feeney and Donald Taunton. (no 188 ) [Cover design from the collection S268] We have not included Journals in the list but have a large stock of the major academic publication of the Society of Glass Painters and other journals and welcome any enquiries on this subject. Furthermore, there are many small pamphlets which provide valuable insights into the windows in churches all over Great Britain and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Customer Location Image Journal 86Th Street Convent New
    IRVING AND CASSON - A. H. DAVENPORT CO. CUSTOMER LISTING Information on this list was taken from design drawings, photographs, and other images within the Irving and Casson -- A. H. Davenport collections. Additional customer names were found in sales journals. An "X" by a customer name indicates whether it was taken from an image, in the sales journals, or both. In some cases, there appear to be multiple spellings for the same name. When the correct spelling could not be determined, the alternate spellings are shown in brackets. Customer Customer Location Image Journal 86th Street Convent New York, NY X A. B. Cutter Co. Boston, MA X X A. C. Clark Memorial X A. D. Club Cambridge, MA X X A. J. Lloyd Co. X X A. M. Byers Co. Pennsylvania X A. Stowell & Co. Boston, MA X X Abbot, Elinor E. X Abbot, John X Abbott Academy Andover, MA X Abbott, A. J. X Abbott, Arthur X Abbott, E. M., Mrs. X Abbott, Elinor E. X Abbott, Gordon X Abbott, J. J. X Abbott, John N. X Abbott, John, Mrs. X Abbott, Nathan Southboro, MA X X Abbott, Nathan, Mrs. Southboro, MA X Abbott, P. S. X Abel, Henry Hamond X Abercrombie & Fitch Co. X X Abertham Construction Co. X Academy of the Sacred Heart Chapel Noroton, CT X Acheson, M. W. X Achilles, H. L. Schenectady, NY X Ackerman, J. E. X Ackerman, J. E. , Mrs. X Ackerman, Jacob X X Adam, William L. X Adams House X Adams, 2nd, Charles F. X Adams, A. J. X Page 1 of 151 Customer Customer Location Image Journal Adams, Arthur, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • List by Owner EXETER, NH
    List by Owner EXETER, NH Land Building Parcel Style Living Owner's Name Location Map Lot Unit Value Value Value Desc Area ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 CASS STREET LLC 1 CASS ST 63 274 132,800 304,400 437,200 4-7 Family 3,023 10 ARBOR STREET LLC 10 ARBOR ST 73 32 131,800 147,600 279,400 Three Family 1,503 10 EPPING RD CONDO ASSOC 10 EPPING RD 63 38 MC 0 0 0 Condominium 0 100 DOMAIN DRIVE DD LLC 88.98% 100 DOMAIN DR 88 5 2,256,000 18,110,600 20,366,600 Office Bldg 263,990 100 HIGH ST CONDOMINIUM 100 HIGH ST 71 51 MC 0 0 0 Condominium 0 103 EPPING ROAD LLC 103 EPPING RD 55 70 142,500 0 142,500 Vacant Land 0 107 WATSON ROAD RELATY TR 107 WATSON RD 19 13 189,800 173,600 363,400 Two Family 1,064 108 HEIGHTS LLC 108 PORTSMOUTH AVE 52 52 439,500 178,100 617,600 Car Wash 3,100 109 WATSON ROAD REALTY TR 109 WATSON RD 19 14 176,200 275,100 451,300 Cape Cod 1,977 11 COURT ST UNITS 1 & 2 LLC 11 COURT ST UNIT 1 72 158 1 0 387,900 387,900 Condo Office 3,082 11 COURT ST UNITS 1 & 2 LLC 11 COURT ST UNIT 2 72 158 2 0 387,900 387,900 Condo Office 3,082 117 WATER ST PROPERTIES LLC 115 WATER ST 72 24 232,800 243,800 476,600 Store 3,504 119-121 FRONT STREET LLC 119-121 FRONT ST 73 215 123,600 220,600 344,200 Two Family 2,947 12 CONTINENTAL DRIVE LLC 60 GOURMET PL 46 1 589,000 6,528,900 7,117,900 Light Indust 106,476 12 HAMPTON FALLS RD 12 HAMPTON FALLS RD 86 16 MC 0 0 0 Condominium 0 12 LINCOLN ST LLC 12 LINCOLN ST 73 262 180,200 331,300
    [Show full text]