DOCSLIB.ORG

Analyzingtheai-Aqsalntifada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analyzingtheai-Aqsalntifada Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Resist Newsletters Resist Collection 1-31-2001 Resist Newsletter, Jan. 2001 Resist Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/resistnewsletter Recommended Citation Resist, "Resist Newsletter, Jan. 2001" (2001). Resist Newsletters. 329. https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/resistnewsletter/329 Inside: Stuggles in the Middle East ISSN0897-2613 •Vol.10#1 A Call to Resist Illegitimate Authority January 2001 AnalyzingtheAI-Aqsalntifada NOAM CHOMSKY fter three weeks of virtual war in he Israeli occupied territories, rime Minister Ehud Barak an­ nounced in late October a new plan to de­ termine the final status of the region. Dur­ ing these weeks, over 100 Palestinians were killed, including 30 children, often by "excessive use oflethal force in circum­ stances in which neither the lives of the security forces nor others were in immi­ nent danger resulting in unlawful killings," Amnesty International concluded in a de­ tailed report that was scarcely mentioned in the US. The ratio of Palestinian to Is­ raeli dead was then about 15-1, reflecting the resources of force available. Barak's plan was not given in detail, but the outlines are familiar: they conform to Palestinian youths shout over the Temple Mount wall. Photo by Nir Kafri, Impact Visuals the "final status map" presented by the US­ Israel as the basis for the Camp David ne­ to include Nablus and other Palestinian cit­ US aid, with increasing energy since the gotiations that collapsed in July. This plan, ies, a central canton is based in Ramallah, US was able to implement its version of extending US-Israeli rejectionist propos­ and a southern canton in Bethlehem; Jeri­ the "peace process" after the Gulf War. als of earlier years, called for cantonization cho is to remain isolated. Palestinians of the territories that Israel had conquered would be effectively cut off from Jerusa­ Tension and Violence Mount in 1967, with mechanisms to ensure that lem, the center of Palestinian life. Similar The goal of the negotiations was to se­ usable land and resources (primarily wa­ arrangements are likely in Gaza, with Is­ cure official PA adherence to this project. ·ter) remain largely in Israeli hands while rael keeping the southern coastal region Two months after they collapsed, the cur­ the population is administered by a cor- and a small settlement at Netzarim (the site rent phase of violence began. Tensions, al­ rupt and brutal Palestinian Authority (PA), of many of the recent atrocities), which is ways high, were raised when the Barak playing the role traditionally assigned to hardly more than an excuse for a large mili­ government authorized a visit by Ariel indigenous collaborators under the several tary presence and roads splitting the Strip Sharon with 1000 police to the Muslim re­ varieties of imperial rule: the Black lead­ below Gaza City. ligious sites (Al-Aqsa) on Thursday, Sep­ ership of South Africa's Bantustans, to These proposals formalize the vast settle­ tember 28. Sharon is the very symbol of mention only the most obvious analogue. ment and construction programs that Israel Israeli state terror and aggression, with a In the West Bank, a northern canton is has been conducting, thanks to munificent continued on page two Vol. 10, #1 RESIST Newsletter Page 1 Analyzing the AI-Aqsa Intifada continued from page one by the importation of an essential commod­ rich record of atrocities going back to 1953. ity to replace the cheap and exploited Pal­ Sharon's announced purpose was to estinian labor on which much ofthe economy demonstrate "Jewish sovereignty" over the relies: hundreds of thousands of illegal im­ Al-Aqsa compound, but as the veteran cor­ migrants from around the world, many of respondent Graham Usher points out, the them victims of the "neoliberal reforms" of "Al-Aqsa intifada," as Palestinians call it, the recent years of "globalization." Surviv­ was not initiated by Sharon's visit; rather, ing in misery and without rights, they are by the massive and intimidating police and regularly described as a virtual slave labor military presence that Barak introduced the force in the Israeli press. The current Barak following day, the day of prayers. Predict­ proposal is to extend this program, reduc­ ably, that led to clashes as thousands of ing still further the prospects even for mere people streamed out of the mosque, leav­ survival for the Palestinians. ing seven Palestinians dead and 200 A major barrier to the program is the wounded. Whatever Barak's purpose, there opposition of the Israeli business commu­ could hardly have been a more efficient nity, which relies on a captive Palestinian way to set the stage for the shocking atroci­ market for some $2.5 billion in annual ex­ ties of the following weeks. ports, and has "forged links with Palestin­ The same can be said about the failed ian security officials" and Arafat's "eco­ negotiations, which focused on Jerusalem, nomic adviser, enabling them to carve out a condition observed strictly by US com­ monopolies with official PA consent" (Fi­ mentary. Possibly Israeli sociologist Baruch nancial Times, October 22; also New York Kimmerling was exaggerating when he Young palestinian uses a slingshot next Times, same day). They have also hoped wrote that a solution to this problem "could to the Temple Mount gate. Photo by Nir to set up industrial zones in the territories, have been reached in five minutes," but he Kafri, Impact Visuals transferring pollution and exploiting a is right to say that "by any diplomatic logic 242), then pursued its unilateral rejection cheap labor force in maquiladora-style in­ [it] should have been the easiest issue to of Palestinian rights in the years that fol­ stallations owned by Israeli enterprises and solve (Ha 'aretz, October 4, 2000). It is un­ lowed, culminating in the "Oslo process." continued on page three derstandable that Clinton-Barak should Since all of this has been effectively ve­ want to suppress what they are doing in the toed from history in the US, it takes a little occupied territories, which is far more im­ work to discover the essential facts. They portant. Why did Arafat agree? Perhaps be­ are not controversial, only evaded. cause he recognizes that the leadership of the Arab states regard the Palestinians as a Rejectionist Plans, Closure and Power nuisance, and have little problem with the As noted, Barak's plan is a particularly Bantustan-style settlement, but cannot harsh version of familiar US-Israeli overlook administration of the religious rejectionism. It calls for terminating elec­ sites, fearing the reaction oftheir own popu­ tricity, water, telecommunications, and lations. Nothing could be better calculated other services that are doled out in meager to set off a confrontation with religious rations to the Palestinian population, who ILLEGITIMATE AUIIIORlff Fu,ndi~ w..°«l ~ '1l1Ce 1961 overtones, the most ominous kind, as cen­ are now under virtual siege. It should be For information and grant guidelines, write to: turies of experience reveal. recalled that independent development was Resist, 259 Elm St., Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144 The primary innovation ofBarak's new ruthlessly barred by the military regime from www.resistinc.org; [email protected] plan is that the US-Israeli demands are to 1967, leaving the people in destitution and Resist Newsletter is published ten times a be imposed by direct force instead of co­ dependency, which has worsened consider­ year by RESIST, Inc., (617)623-5110. The ercive diplomacy, and in a harsher form. ably during the US-run "Oslo process." views expressed in articles, other than edi­ The outlines are in basic accord with poli­ One reason is the "closures" regularly torials, are those of the authors and do not cies established informally in 1968 (the instituted, must brutally by the more dov­ necessarily represent the opinions of the Allon Plan), and variants that have been ish Labor-based governments. As dis­ RESIST staff or board. proposed since by both political groupings cussed by another outstanding journalist, RESIST Staff: Jacquie Bishop (the Sharon Plan, the Labor government Amira Hass, this policy was initiated by Robin Carton plans, and others). It is important to recall the Rabin government "years before Amanda Matos-Gonzalez that the policies have not only been pro­ Hamas had planned suicide attacks, [and] Carol Schachet posed, but implemented, with the support has been perfected over the years, espe­ of the US. That support has been decisive cially since the establishment of the Pales­ RESIST Volunteer: Daphne Lees since 1971, when Washington abandoned tinian National Authority." Newsletter Editor: Carol Schachet the basic diplomatic framework that it had An efficient mechanism of strangulation Printing: Red Sun Press initiated (UN Security Council Resolution and control, closure has been accompanied ()Printed on Recycled Paper with Soy Ink~· Page 2 RESIST Newsletter January 2001 Analyzing the AI-Aqsa Intifada continued from page two the Palestinian elite, who are enriching The innovation of Barak's new plan is that themselves in the time-honored fashion. Barak's new proposals appear to be more the US-Israeli demands are to be imposed of a warning than a plan, though they are a natural extension of what has come before. by direct force instead of diplomacy. Insofar as they are implemented, they would extend the project of "invisible transfer" that settlement was "frozen," in accord leigh (North Carolina) press. that has been underway for many years, with the dovish image preferred in the US The sale of military helicopters was con­ and that makes more sense than outright and by much of the Israeli left. They made demned by Amnesty International (Oct. 19), "ethnic cleansing" (as we call the process use of the "freezing" to intensify settle­ because these "US-supplied helicopters when carried out by official enemies).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petition of Protest Against Indiana's Anti-Bds Legislation
    BDS IS NEITHER “ANTI-ISRAEL” NOR “ANTI-JEWISH” PETITION OF PROTEST AGAINST INDIANA’S ANTI-BDS LEGISLATION We, the undersigned, write with alarm in response to the Indiana General Assembly’s passing of SR 74, the so-called “Boycott Our Enemies not Israel Act.” According to the Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz, the approval of SR 74, following the Indiana House’s unanimous passing of HR 59, “expresses opposition to the anti-Jewish and anti-Israel” BDS movement. The bill further states that “the global spread of anti- Jewish speech and violence “represents an attack, not only on Jews, but on the fundamental principles of the United States.” Pending Governor Pence’s likely signature, in passing this bill, Indiana will become only the second state in the United States to pass legislation formally opposing the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement regarding Israel. We completely reject this characterization of the global BDS movement, as well as of the more focused BDS resolutions of various church denominations (eg. Presbyterian Church USA, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church) and other organizations. It does not stifle free speech; in fact, it is the essence of the exercise of free speech. BDS is not (the vague) “anti-Israel” and it is certainly not “anti- Jewish.” In fact, BDS policies make it clear that it is a human rights based movement and opposed to racism in all forms, including anti-Semitism. This is one of the reasons why many Nobel Peace Prize laureates and faith groups support BDS, including Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu and Mairead McGuire, The Baptist and Episcopal Peace Fellowships, and the Palestine-Israel Mission Networks of the Presbyterian Church USA, United Church of Christ, and Quakers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Debate Between Former Knesset Member Uri Avnery and Doctor Ilan Pappe Moderator: Professor Zalman Amit Gush Shalom Forum
    1 A debate between former Knesset Member Uri Avnery and Doctor Ilan Pappe moderator: Professor Zalman Amit Gush Shalom Forum “Two States or One State” Zalman Amit: Greetings to you all, and thanks for coming to be with us this evening. First of all, I would like to thank Teddy Katz, who initiated this event and did a large part of the logistics involved. I would not be exaggerating in stating that the subject we discuss today is the most important and most difficult question facing people on the left side of the political spectrum, and those whom we could broadly call the people of the peace movement. I also think we are lucky in having tonight two speakers who are perhaps the most clear representatives, respectively, of the two approaches and worldviews to whose debate this evening is devoted. To my right is Dr. Ilan Pappe, historian of Exeter University, formerly of Haifa University. [Pappe corrects: Not yet formerly]. To my left is Uri Avnery, former Knesset Member, former editor of Haolam Hazeh Weekly, and present activist in Gush Shalom. As agreed, the debate will be conducted as follows: First, Pappe will speak for twenty minutes and Uri Avnery will answer in a similar period of time. Then, both will speak again for ten minutes each. Then will come the time for questions and answers, and I as moderator promise to exercise no censorship. Finally, Ilan and Uri will have five minutes each for summation. I now ask Ilan to start the first round. Ilan Pappe: I would like to thank Gush Shalom for this event, for the initiative and the willingness to discuss such an important subject in such an open forum.
    [Show full text]
  • A Completely Different Look at the Israeli-Palestinian
    TRUTH against TRUTH A Completely Different Look at the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict 1 The Arabs believed that the Jews had been implanted in Palestine by Western Imperialism, in order to subjugate the Arab world. The Zionists, on the other hand, were convinced that the Arab resistance to the Zionist enterprise was simply the consequence of the murderous nature of the Arabs and of Islam. The Israeli public must recognize that besides all the positive aspects of the Zionist enterprise, a terrible injustice has been inflicted on the Palestinian people. This requires a readiness to hear and understand the other side's position in this historical conflict, in order to bridge the two national experiences and unify them in a joint narrative. 2 The Tyranny of Myths both in the general picture and almost every detail. 1 After more than a hundred years, the Israeli- 5 From the beginning of the conflict up to the present Palestinian conflict still dominates all spheres of our day, the Zionist/Israeli leadership has acted in total lives and troubles the entire world. This is a unique disregard of the Palestinian narrative. Even when conflict, born in extraordinary circumstances. It can it wished to reach a solution, such efforts were be described as a clash between an irresistible force doomed to failure because of ignorance of the and an immovable object - Zionism on the one side, national aspirations, traumas, fears and hopes of the the Palestinian people on the other. Palestinian people. Something similar happened on the other side, even if there is no symmetry between 2 Already a fifth generation of Israelis and Palestinians the two sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Obstacles to Peace
    Rehov Tiveria 37 Tel: +972-(0)54-303-9170 Website: www.icahd.org 94543 Jerusalem, Israel E-mail: [email protected] OBSTACLES TO PEACE A REFRAMING OF THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT Written and Presented By Jeff Halper, Director The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) Maps Prepared and Designed By Michael Younan and PalMap of GSE Front Cover Photograph By Anna da Sacco May, 2018 Copyright 2018. This document is protected by international copyrights. If any part of this document is reproduced in any form, acknowledgment should be given to the authors and their affiliated organizations. WHAT IS ICAHD? THE ISRAELI COMMITTEE AGAINST HOUSE DEMOLITIONS The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) is a non-violent Israeli direct-action organization established 2 in 1997 to end Israel’s Occupation over the Palestinians. A grassroots organization, ICAHD has focused on the Big political Picture even while engaging in protest, resistance and informational activities “on the ground.” We seek, together with our Palestinian, Israeli and international partners, to formulate and achieve a genuinely just political settlement to the Israeli- 4 Palestinian “conflict,” one that revolves around the creation of a single democratic state over the entire country. 8 As it name implies, ICAHD takes as the main focus of its resistance Israel’s policy of demolishing Palestinian homes, both in Israel and in the Occupied Territory. A key element of judaization,” of transforming Palestine into the Land of Israel, 9 is the demolition of Palestinian homes and entire communities. During the Nakba some 52,000 Palestinian homes were destroyed, more than 530 villages, towns and urban neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in GAZA Today Indifference of the World
    Life in GAZA Today A collection of paintings by Christian and Muslim children and adult artists who live in Gaza Catalogue Indifference of the World Mohammad Al Amrani – Aged 15 years 1 Introduction In December 2008 the Israeli Defense Forces invaded the tiny pocket of land on the eastern Mediterranean Sea known as the Gaza Strip killing approximately 1400 residents and wounding thousands more. Having wreaked great destruction and death on the area the military then withdrew and tightened again its close cordon of control around all aspects of life in the Gaza Strip which had been in place for two years. Israel continues to control the borders of Gaza, and controls all movement and trade with the outside world. Gaza’s seaport is closed and its airport bombed. All access to the population of 1.5million (over half of whom are children) including humanitarian aid, all food and water, construction supplies and medical equipment and supplies is closely controlled by Israel. These two experiences of ‘the war’ and ‘the siege’ have defined life for the people in Gaza. What is it like to live under such conditions? What do ordinary people experience? How do they cope and what do they long for? Can we hear the voice of ordinary Gazan people through the razor wire of the border fences and the blackout of everyday news and gossip from one of the poorest, most densely populated and most heavily controlled places on the planet? The Major Issues and Theology Foundation (MIAT) believes that one way we can do this is through art.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine - Israel Journal of Politic…
    08/09/2009 Palestine - Israel Journal of Politic… The Palestine-Israel Journal is a quarterly of MIDDLE EAST PUBLICATIONS, a registered non-profit organization (No. 58-023862-4). V ol 1 5 N o. 4 & V ol 1 6 N o. 1, 0 8 /09 / The Refugee Question Focus Palestinian Internally Displaced Persons inside Israel: Challenging the Solid Structures The Palestinians who remained in Israel after 1948 have suffered displacement and dispossession by Nihad Boqa’i Palestinian internally displaced persons (IDPs) inside Israel are part of the larger Palestinian refugee population that was displaced/expelled from their villages and homes during the 1948 war in Palestine — the Nakba. While most of the refugees were displaced to the Arab states and the Palestinian territories that did not fall under Israeli control (i.e., the West Bank and the Gaza Strip), some 150,000 Palestinians Editorial Board remained in the areas of Palestine that became the state of Israel. Hisham Awartani This included approximately 30,000-40,000 Palestinians who were also displaced during the war. As in the case of the Palestinian Danny Rubinstein refugees who were displaced/expelled beyond the borders of the new Sam'an Khoury state, Israel refused to allow internally displaced Palestinians to return Boaz Evron to their homes and villages. Walid Salem Displacement did not end with the 1948 war. In the years following Ari Rath the establishment of Israel, internally displaced Palestinians, a small number of refugees who had returned spontaneously to their villages Zahra Khalidi and Palestinians who had not been displaced during the war were Daniel Bar-Tal expelled for security and other reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Israel
    The Other Israel Newsletter of the Israeli Council for Israeli-Palestinian Peace June 1993 No 57 P.O.B. 2542 Holon, Israel 58125 Editorial Board: Uri Avnery, Matti Peled, Yaakov Phone/ fax: (03) 5565804 Arnon, Haim Bar'am, Yael Lotan, Yossi Amitay Editor: Adam Keller – ISSN 0792-4615 – Assistant editor: Beate Zilversmidt COUNTDOWN Until the last moment it was far from certain if and opposed. But the concession was effectively annulled by when the ninth round of the Washington peace talks the stipulation that Israel would have veto power would open. For the Palestinians, resuming the talks over each and every piece of Palestinian legislation. while the four hundred deportees remain in their The fundamental negotiations impasse remained Lebanese tent camp was a difficult decision; the the same: the Palestinians wanted some assurance personal intervention of PLO leader Yasser Arafat about the definite solution which would follow after was needed to convince the reluctant Haidar Abd–el- five years of "authonomy"; the Israeli negotiators Shafi, chief Palestinian negotiator, to take the plane refused to make any reference to that definite to Washington. solution, not even to promise that it would be based The resumed talks opened in a mood of marked on the principle of "terrtory in return for peace" – optimism. The Israeli negotiators presented a set of even though that was the Israeli Labour Party's main new proposals which, at first glance, seemed promising. slogan for decades. Some good-will gestures were made in the Occupied No progress was achieved either at the parallel Territories, the most conspicious being the return of Israeli-Syrian talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Combatants for Peace Annual Programs Report, 2017-2018
    Combatants for Peace Annual Programs Report, 2017-2018 “If I am not for me, who is for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?” – Hillel Introduction In 2006, Palestinian and Israeli former combatants laid down their weapons and established Combatants for Peace (CfP). Committed to joint nonviolence since its foundation, CfP works to end the Israeli occupation and all forms of violence to build a peaceful future. For over a decade we have led action based on shared values of freedom, democracy, security and dignity for all. We inspire profound individual and communal change in Israel and Palestine and serve as a model for societies across the world separated by seemingly intractable violence. Combatants for Peace is the world’s ​ only nonviolent movement founded and sustained by former armed combatants in an ongoing conflict. The unique impact of our grassroots, binational approach was ​ recognized in both 2016 and 2018 when CfP was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Key Programmatic Growth 2015-2018 Despite the political situation worsening on the ground, Combatants for Peace continues to reach new milestones, expand our reach, and develop new initiatives to declare: violence is not our fate, there is another way! Combatants for Peace has entered 2018 with increased momentum. The past year has seen extensive growth of our programs, implementation of new partnerships, and building of the largest-ever binational community of Palestinians and Israelis engaged in peacebuilding and nonviolent direct action. Below
    [Show full text]
  • In Israel/Palestine Maia Hallward Kennesaw State University, [email protected]
    Kennesaw State University DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University Faculty Publications Spring 2011 Pursuing "Peace" in Israel/Palestine Maia Hallward Kennesaw State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Maia Hallward. (2011). Pursuing "peace" in Israel/Palestine. Journal of Third World Studies, 28(1), 185-202. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PURSUING "PEACE" IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE By Maia Hallward* INTRODUCTION Nine years after the outbreak of the second intifada (uprising) in September 2000 and sixteen years after the signing of the Oslo Accords in September 1993, Israelis and Palestinians seem as far as ever from a final status agreement. Diplomatic efforts by the George W. Bush administration—notably the Performance-Based Road Map to Peace and the 2007 Annapolis Conference—avoided the core confiict issues, and delayed such negotiations by emphasizing "provisional" borders.' Not only do such tactics allow more time for consolidating "facts on the ground" that can prejudice final status negotiations, but the lack
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine Is Still the Issue
    Palestine Is Introduction Still The Issue A special report by John Pilger "25 years ago I made a film called Palestine is Still the Issue. It was about a nation of people, the Palestinians, forced off their land and later sub- jected to a military occupation by Israel – an occu- pation condemned by the UN and almost every country in the world including Britain. But Israel is backed by a very powerful friend, the United There is only one way of ending this, it’s ending the States. So in 25 years, if you are to speak of great “occupation because occupation has become the cancer injustice here, nothing has changed. What has that is eating the lives of both people. changed is that the Palestinians have fought back. Dr Mustafa Barghhouti 1 ” Stateless and humiliated for so long, they have risen up against Israel’s huge military machine, Rami Elhanan, an Israeli whose daughter died in a suicide although they themselves have no army, no tanks, bomb attack, says the occupation has "reduced us into no American planes and gunships or missiles. Some animals in a way that sometimes I am ashamed to say I am an have committed desperate acts of terror – like sui- Israeli." 2 cide bombing. But for Palestinians, the overriding, routine terror, day after day, has been the ruthless The issue of the Palestinians remains at the core of the Arab- control of almost every aspect of their lives – as if Israeli conflict, one of the most intractable and protracted in they live in an open prison.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghada Karmi (Ed.), 1996, Ithaca Press, Hb 256Pp, £25.00, Pb 214Pp, £12.95
    Jerusalem Today: What Future for the Peace Process?, Ghada Karmi (ed.), 1996, Ithaca Press, hb 256pp, £25.00, pb 214pp, £12.95 This volume is the first product of an independent body of "ordinary people who... cared about the fate of Jerusalem", known as the International Campaign for Jerusalem (ICJ), headed by the editor of this book, Dr Ghada Karmi, who also wrote its introduction. In June 1995, a conference was held in London to discuss Jerusalem from various aspects. Professor Edward Said gave the keynote address to the audience. With his usual eloquence and thought provoking essays, Said first turns to lament the collective incompetence of Pales- tinians who have failed to record the story of Jerusalem's loss in 1948 and 1967. He noted that there has been no Palestinian narrative of 1948 and after to challenge the dominant Is- raeli narrative (p. 5). It seems that Said was echoing Israel Shahak's thoughts on Israel's fal- sification of the history of Jerusalem and Palestine (p. 127) that need to be challenged by the other party. Correctly so, one may note that there is not a single Arab university or a research insti- tute that has built a special department specializing in Jerusalem's history, geography, reli- gious sites, archaeology, etc. to counter Israel's narrative. Israel has at least a dozen of such institutes that only deal with Jerusalem. Edward Said, and rightly so, noted that "Palestinian leaders have always been misunder- stood, particularly at times like this, when Israel depends so heavily on the virtual absence of Palestinian voices, counter representations, and strategies" (p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulation of Olive Trees in the Occupied West Bank
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2009 Uprooting Identities: The Regulation of Olive Trees in the Occupied West Bank Irus Braverman University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Irus Braverman, Uprooting Identities: The Regulation of Olive Trees in the Occupied West Bank, PoLAR, Nov. 2009, at 237. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Irus Braverman SUNY-Buffalo Law School Uprooting Identities: The Regulation of Olive Trees in the Occupied West Bank It is as though, by virtue of the derealization of Palestine, a project reaching back over 50 years, the roots of Palestinian violence – the dispossession of the Palestinian people, the dispersal of refugees, and the horrors of military occupation – have been torn up with their olive groves. [Gregory 2003:319] Like children, their trees look so naïve, as if they can’t harm anyone. But like [their] children, several years later they turn into a ticking bomb. [Interview, Chief Inspector Kishik, Israel’s Civil Administration, Beit El military base, September 7, 2006] Trees in general, and olive and pine trees in particular, perform a pivotal role in both the Zionist and the Palestinian national narratives.
    [Show full text]