The Other Israel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Other Israel The Other Israel Newsletter of the Israeli Council for Israeli-Palestinian Peace June 1993 No 57 P.O.B. 2542 Holon, Israel 58125 Editorial Board: Uri Avnery, Matti Peled, Yaakov Phone/ fax: (03) 5565804 Arnon, Haim Bar'am, Yael Lotan, Yossi Amitay Editor: Adam Keller – ISSN 0792-4615 – Assistant editor: Beate Zilversmidt COUNTDOWN Until the last moment it was far from certain if and opposed. But the concession was effectively annulled by when the ninth round of the Washington peace talks the stipulation that Israel would have veto power would open. For the Palestinians, resuming the talks over each and every piece of Palestinian legislation. while the four hundred deportees remain in their The fundamental negotiations impasse remained Lebanese tent camp was a difficult decision; the the same: the Palestinians wanted some assurance personal intervention of PLO leader Yasser Arafat about the definite solution which would follow after was needed to convince the reluctant Haidar Abd–el- five years of "authonomy"; the Israeli negotiators Shafi, chief Palestinian negotiator, to take the plane refused to make any reference to that definite to Washington. solution, not even to promise that it would be based The resumed talks opened in a mood of marked on the principle of "terrtory in return for peace" – optimism. The Israeli negotiators presented a set of even though that was the Israeli Labour Party's main new proposals which, at first glance, seemed promising. slogan for decades. Some good-will gestures were made in the Occupied No progress was achieved either at the parallel Territories, the most conspicious being the return of Israeli-Syrian talks. The Syrians continued to thirty Palestinians deported before the Intifada; they demand – as a condition for discussing the details of were received at the Jordan River bridges by future peaceful relations with Israel – to know the thousands of jubilant Palestinians, in scenes fleetingly extent of the intended Israeli territorial withdrawal reminiscent of the euphoria following the Madrid from the Golan Heigths; the Israeli negotiators were Peace Conference in 1991. In Jerusalem, the cabinet just as adamant in refusing to talk in detail about doves – headed by Foreign Minister Peres – made a withdrawal, until the Syrians first specify the series of public statements going far beyond the peaceful relations. official government policy, seemingly with the tacit The Middle East negotiations process, which consent of Prime Minister Rabin. started at Madrid and continued in Washington, was Both the press and the politicians discussed in designed with the implicit idea that the U.S. would detail the idea of forming, in the near future, a involve itself at the highest level and intervene to Palestinian police force. Police Minister Shachal break through deadlocks. However, what energy the traveled to Nablus, where he discussed the idea with Clinton Administration had for solving regional local PLO supporters. For their part, Israeli settlers conflicts was mainly directed to the Bosnian Crisis in the Occupied Territories received with great (where its performance was far from brilliant). alarm the idea of armed Palestinians challenging the The Israeli-Palestinian and Israeli-Arab talks were settlers' present monopoly on weapons. In turn, the left in charge of low-ranking State Department settlers' angry statements and threats increased the officials. Only at the very end of the ninth round did general feeling that an agreement, including fun- the Americans make a belated effort to negotiate a damental changes in the status–quo, was indeed common Israeli–Palestinian statement. But the imminent. American draft, prepared in consultation with the Israeli delegation, was regarded by the Palestinians The optimistic mood did not last much more than a as biased; and the delegations returned from another week. Rabin silenced the doves by a few angry round of talks, to find an ever more grim and remarks at the cabinet meeting, and reasserted the failed threatening situation in the Occupied Territories. official policy. (Peres had to retract his earlier call • for direct negotiations with the PLO.) And at Washington, the new Israeli propsals turned out, on For Rabin, the gestures made at the beginning of close examination, to contain not much more than May – such as the return of the thirty Palestinian "old merchandise in new wrapping" – as the deportees – did not signify a fundamental change of Palestinians put it. Thus, the Israeli negotiators the army's behaviour in the Occupied Territories, agreed to let the elected Palestinian council have but mere tactical concessions which he grudgingly some legislative power – an idea which they hitherto had to make, as the price for re-starting the talks. 2 Rabin was told by his military advisers that such On the "left", the closure initially got the full concessions had the effect of weakening the military support of the Meretz ministers. But under pressure government's authority and diminishing its deterrent from the Meretz rank-and-file, some of whom power. (The military governors were especially participated in protest actions aganst the closure, the alarmed about the fact that thousands of Palestinians party's ministers became increasingly more vocal in had gathered to welcome the returned deportees, demanding measures to help the distressed Palestinian waving Palestinian flags and singing national songs workers – from paying them unemployment benefits under the soldiers' eyes.) Rabin authorised military to starting large-scale public works projects in the commanders on the ground to take all actions Occupied Territories. Very little came of these necessary to "restore order, reduce acts of violence, proposals – due especially to the opposition of and fight terrorism". Finance Minister Shohat, who fought nail and tooth The results were recorded by a special Ammnesty against any proposal involving a new budgetary International team, despatched to the Middle East: expense. The month of May already registered the highest Shohat's idea (which, in turn, was vetoed by Rabin) monthly death toll since the end of 1992, with up to 24 was to end the closure – out of concern, not for the people shot dead by Israeli forces. Amnesty Inter- Palestinians, but for the Israeli economy. In particular national believes that many of these killings are two branches were hit severely by the loss of their absolutely unjustifiable, and that some may amount to cheap labor pool – the farmers and building extra-judicial executions. Amnesty International is contractors, both of whom were putting pressure on also concerned that the use of massive firepower by the government, some of their demonstrations Israeli forces, against dwellings in which Palestinians running into violence. suspected of serious crimes are alleged to be hiding, The government partially mollified them by allowing a may amount to collective punishment (Amnesty restricted number of Palestinian workers to come International Special Report, 27.5.93). back, and authorizing the introduction of cheap labor from elsewhere. (Thailand seems, at the moment, the At the same time, the Palestinian population was most popular source; during a recent visit to China, feeling, more and more heavily, the crushing burden Foreign Minister Peres explored the possibility of of the closure imposed on the Occupied Territories at importing workers from there as well.) Another the end of March. After nearly three decades of measure tried, though with only-partial success, was forced economic integration – with Israel inhibiting to toughen the laws concerning unemployment economic growth in the Territories and channeling benefits – in an effort to force young unemployed their inhabitants into the role of cheap labor in the Israelis to take the hard jobs vacated by the Israeli economy – the Rabin government attempted Palestinians. to reverse the trend virtually overnight, cutting 120,000 Palestinian workers off from their jobs with A soldier stationed in the Gaza Strip told Ha'olam no previous warning. Hazeh about dozens of refugee children scrambling The closure decision was originally taken as a and fighting each other, to get a single orange which tactical step, in order to prevent knife-wielding had fallen out of his pocket. Still, Israeli military and Palestinians from reaching the main Israeli population civil officials repeatedly deny that the Palestinian centers – as they did, to devastating effect, during population's situation has reached the level of March. As the closure continued, other justifiactions starvation. They are probably right, in the sense that and reasonings were added, making continuation of – even with unemployment reaching the 50% mark, the closure into a virtual panacea. As with the and in certain areas passing it – nearly all Palestinians deportations, Rabin got a wide political support for are still able to give themselves and their children at this act: the right-wing opposition mostly supported least one meal of some kind each day, though this it, as it regularly supports any measure of collective becomes increasingly difficult. Reports from the punishment against the Palestinians. (An exception Occupied Territories tell of people using up all of were some of the settlers in the Occupied Territories, their accumulated savings and taking up any available who feared that – with the Palestinians bottled up in work – even at a half or quarter of their previous the Territories – Palestinian anger and frustration (already meager) salaries; of people with a small plot would be directed at the settlers,) of land reverting to subsistence farming, while those The Other Israel P.O.B.2542 Holon 58125, Israel; Phone/fax: (03) 5565804 Yearly subscription rates: Institutions $50; Individuals $30; Pensioners/Students/ Unemployed $15. You may also send us the equivalent in other currency. Receipts on request only! • France, Belgium, Switzerland: Mantrant, B.P. 49-18, 75865 Paris Cedex 18, France N.B: new Paris address! A French translation of selected articles is available. Austria, West Germany: Israel-Palästina Komitee, John Bunzl, Biberstr.
Recommended publications
  • Palestinian Women: Mothers, Martyrs and Agents of Political Change
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2011 Palestinian Women: Mothers, Martyrs and Agents of Political Change Rebecca Ann Otis University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Otis, Rebecca Ann, "Palestinian Women: Mothers, Martyrs and Agents of Political Change" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 491. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/491 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Palestinian Women: Mothers, Martyrs and Agents of Political Change __________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________ by Rebecca A. Otis June 2011 Advisor: Dr. Martin Rhodes ©Copyright by Rebecca A. Otis 2011 All Rights Reserved Author: Rebecca A. Otis Title: PALESTINIAN WOMEN: MOTHERS, MARTYRS AND AGENTS OF POLITICAL CHANGE Advisor: Dr. Martin Rhodes Degree Date: June 2011 ABSTRACT This dissertation seeks to understand the role of women as political actors in the rise of Islamo-nationalist movement in Palestine. Using a historical and ethnographic approach, it examines the changing opportunity structures available to Palestinian women in the nationalist struggle between 1987 and 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Signatories. Appeal from Palestine. 20.6
    19/06/2020 Signatories for “Appeal from Palestine to the Peoples and States of the World” Name Current/ Previous Occupation 1. Abbas Zaki Member of the Central Committee of Fatah—Ramallah 2. Abd El-Qader Husseini Chairman of Faisal Husseini Foundation— Jerusalem 3. Abdallah Abu Alhnoud Member of the Fatah Advisory Council— Gaza 4. Abdallah Abu Hamad President of Taraji Wadi Al-Nes Sports Club—Bethlehem 5. Abdallah Hijazi President of the Civil Retired Assembly, Former Ambassador—Ramallah 6. Abdallah Yousif Alsha’rawi President of the Palestinian Motors Sport & Motorcycle & Bicycles Federation— Ramallah 7. Abdel Halim Attiya President of Al-Thahirya Youth Club— Hebron 8. Abdel Jalil Zreiqat President of Tafouh Youth Sports Club— Hebron 9. Abdel Karim Abu Khashan University Lecturer, Birzeit University— Ramallah 10. Abdel Majid Hijeh Secretary-General of the Olympic Committee—Ramallah 11. Abdel Majid Sweilem University Lecturer and Journalist— Ramallah 12. Abdel Qader Hasan Abdallah Secretary General of the Palestine Workers Kabouli Union—Lebanon, Alkharoub Region 13. Abdel Rahim Mahamid Secretary of the Al-Taybeh Sports Club— Ramallah 14. Abdel Raof Asqoul Storyteller—Tyre 15. Abdel Salam Abu Nada Expert in Media Development—Brussels 16. Abdel-Rahman Tamimi Director General of the Palestinian Hydrology Group—Ramallah 17. Abdo Edrisi President of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry—Hebron 18. Abdul Rahman Bseiso Retired Ambassador—Cyprus 19. Abdul Rahman Hamad Former Minister—Gaza 20. Abu Ali Masoud Vice-Chairman of the Fatah Advisory Council—Ramallah 21. Adalah Abu Sitta Chairwoman of the Board of Directors of the Right to Live Society—Gaza 22. Adel Al-Asta Writer—Gaza 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition of Protest Against Indiana's Anti-Bds Legislation
    BDS IS NEITHER “ANTI-ISRAEL” NOR “ANTI-JEWISH” PETITION OF PROTEST AGAINST INDIANA’S ANTI-BDS LEGISLATION We, the undersigned, write with alarm in response to the Indiana General Assembly’s passing of SR 74, the so-called “Boycott Our Enemies not Israel Act.” According to the Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz, the approval of SR 74, following the Indiana House’s unanimous passing of HR 59, “expresses opposition to the anti-Jewish and anti-Israel” BDS movement. The bill further states that “the global spread of anti- Jewish speech and violence “represents an attack, not only on Jews, but on the fundamental principles of the United States.” Pending Governor Pence’s likely signature, in passing this bill, Indiana will become only the second state in the United States to pass legislation formally opposing the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement regarding Israel. We completely reject this characterization of the global BDS movement, as well as of the more focused BDS resolutions of various church denominations (eg. Presbyterian Church USA, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church) and other organizations. It does not stifle free speech; in fact, it is the essence of the exercise of free speech. BDS is not (the vague) “anti-Israel” and it is certainly not “anti- Jewish.” In fact, BDS policies make it clear that it is a human rights based movement and opposed to racism in all forms, including anti-Semitism. This is one of the reasons why many Nobel Peace Prize laureates and faith groups support BDS, including Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu and Mairead McGuire, The Baptist and Episcopal Peace Fellowships, and the Palestine-Israel Mission Networks of the Presbyterian Church USA, United Church of Christ, and Quakers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Debate Between Former Knesset Member Uri Avnery and Doctor Ilan Pappe Moderator: Professor Zalman Amit Gush Shalom Forum
    1 A debate between former Knesset Member Uri Avnery and Doctor Ilan Pappe moderator: Professor Zalman Amit Gush Shalom Forum “Two States or One State” Zalman Amit: Greetings to you all, and thanks for coming to be with us this evening. First of all, I would like to thank Teddy Katz, who initiated this event and did a large part of the logistics involved. I would not be exaggerating in stating that the subject we discuss today is the most important and most difficult question facing people on the left side of the political spectrum, and those whom we could broadly call the people of the peace movement. I also think we are lucky in having tonight two speakers who are perhaps the most clear representatives, respectively, of the two approaches and worldviews to whose debate this evening is devoted. To my right is Dr. Ilan Pappe, historian of Exeter University, formerly of Haifa University. [Pappe corrects: Not yet formerly]. To my left is Uri Avnery, former Knesset Member, former editor of Haolam Hazeh Weekly, and present activist in Gush Shalom. As agreed, the debate will be conducted as follows: First, Pappe will speak for twenty minutes and Uri Avnery will answer in a similar period of time. Then, both will speak again for ten minutes each. Then will come the time for questions and answers, and I as moderator promise to exercise no censorship. Finally, Ilan and Uri will have five minutes each for summation. I now ask Ilan to start the first round. Ilan Pappe: I would like to thank Gush Shalom for this event, for the initiative and the willingness to discuss such an important subject in such an open forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo at 25: an Illusive Peace
    Oslo at 25: An illusive peace 22-23 October 2018 University of São Paulo Programme Booklet - English.indd 1 19/10/2018 15:43:56 Oslo at 25: An illusive peace The Oslo Accords signed in 1993 were supposed to end in a final settlement of the Palestine- Israel conflict after an interim period of five years. That objective never materialised with the seven ‘permanent status’ issues yet to be negotiated. The Declaration of Principles (DOP) lists them in the following order: (1) Jerusalem, (2) refugees, (3) settlements, (4) security arrangements, (5) borders, (6) relations and cooperation with other neighbours, and (7) other issues of common interest. From the onset, it was clear that the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) and the State of Israel had two contradictory visions of the process. While the former envisaged an end to Israel’s settler colonialism, the latter saw it as an opportunity to create a system of indirect rule over the territories occupied in 1967. Whereas there were 260,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank and East Jerusalem in 1993; today they number more than 600,000. The obvious question, therefore, is that if Israel was really committed to peace, why did it invest so heavily in the construction and maintenance of new settlements in the occupied territories. In normal circumstances, where the rule of law is upheld and mediation was conducted in good faith, this situation could not have persisted. The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 clearly prohibits countries from moving their population into territories occupied in war (Article 49). Hence, it was inevitable that the disregard of international law in the Oslo process would lead to a dead end.
    [Show full text]
  • Annapolis: Optimism Vs
    Annapolis: Optimism vs. Pessimism Sojourners Magazine, January 2008 “Do you know the definition of a pessimist?” asks Afif Safieh, head of the PLO Delegation to the USA. He answers with a bitter smile: “an optimist with information.” In an interview with Akiva Eldar published in Ha`aretz back in September 2007, Afif said, “My message to the American society as a Palestinian diplomat is not `give up a friend` but `add a friend.` I don`t have a problem with the commitment to Israel`s existence; I`m just asking my American friends if you are also committed to Israel`s territorial expansion? Do your interests include the Israeli occupation in the territories? For this is it worth it for you to fight with the entire Arab world? I`m saying to my American friends that the U.S. is a wonderful society, pluralistic, and a nation of nations. It absorbed eight million Muslims, of them four million who are Arabs and 400,000 Palestinians… Public opinion polls show that 60 percent of Americans would like to see a more balanced policy toward us… and 70 percent support a solution of two states.” There are grounds for both optimism and pessimism arising from the Annapolis Conference. What is in no doubt is the price of failure. In a letter written to George W. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice before the Annapolis conference, a group of foreign policy advisors headed by Zbigniew Brzezinski, Lee H. Hamilton, Henry Siegman, Brent Scowcroft, Paul Volcker and other former Washington officials, spell out how “Failure Risks Devastating Consequences”.
    [Show full text]
  • 21/06/2020 Signatories List for “Appeal from Palestine to the Peoples and States of the World”
    21/06/2020 Signatories List for “Appeal from Palestine to the Peoples and States of the World” Name Current/ Previous Occupation 1. ‘Ahd Bassem Tamimi Civil Society Activist –Ramallah 2. Abbas Zaki Member of the Central Committee of Fatah—Ramallah 3. Abd El-Qader Husseini Chairman of Faisal Husseini Foundation— Jerusalem 4. Abdallah Abu Alhnoud Member of the Fatah Advisory Council— Gaza 5. Abdallah Abu Hamad President of Taraji Wadi Al-Nes Sports Club—Bethlehem 6. Abdallah Hijazi President of the Civil Retired Assembly, Former Ambassador—Ramallah 7. Abdallah Yousif Alsha’rawi President of the Palestinian Motors Sport & Motorcycle & Bicycles Federation— Ramallah 8. Abdel Halim Attiya President of Al-Thahirya Youth Club— Hebron 9. Abdel Jalil Zreiqat President of Tafouh Youth Sports Club— Hebron 10. Abdel Karim Abu Khashan University Lecturer, Birzeit University— Ramallah 11. Abdel Majid Hijeh Secretary-General of the Olympic Committee—Ramallah 12. Abdel Majid Sweilem University Lecturer and Journalist— Ramallah 13. Abdel Qader Hasan Abdallah Secretary-General of the Palestine Workers Kabouli Union—Lebanon, Alkharoub Region 14. Abdel Rahim Mahamid Secretary of Al-Taybeh Sports Club— Ramallah 15. Abdel Raof Asqoul Storyteller—Tyre 16. Abdel Salam Abu Askar Journalist—Ramallah 17. Abdel Salam Abu Nada Expert in Media Development—Brussels 18. Abdel-Rahman Tamimi Director General of the Palestinian Hydrology Group—Ramallah 19. Abdo Edrisi President of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry—Hebron 20. Abdul Rahman Bseiso Retired Ambassador—Cyprus 21. Abdul Rahman Hamad Former Minister—Gaza 22. Abu Ali Masoud Vice Chairman of the Fatah Advisory Council—Ramallah 23. Adalah Abu Sitta Chairwoman of the Board of Directors of the Right to Live Society—Gaza 1 24.
    [Show full text]
  • A Completely Different Look at the Israeli-Palestinian
    TRUTH against TRUTH A Completely Different Look at the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict 1 The Arabs believed that the Jews had been implanted in Palestine by Western Imperialism, in order to subjugate the Arab world. The Zionists, on the other hand, were convinced that the Arab resistance to the Zionist enterprise was simply the consequence of the murderous nature of the Arabs and of Islam. The Israeli public must recognize that besides all the positive aspects of the Zionist enterprise, a terrible injustice has been inflicted on the Palestinian people. This requires a readiness to hear and understand the other side's position in this historical conflict, in order to bridge the two national experiences and unify them in a joint narrative. 2 The Tyranny of Myths both in the general picture and almost every detail. 1 After more than a hundred years, the Israeli- 5 From the beginning of the conflict up to the present Palestinian conflict still dominates all spheres of our day, the Zionist/Israeli leadership has acted in total lives and troubles the entire world. This is a unique disregard of the Palestinian narrative. Even when conflict, born in extraordinary circumstances. It can it wished to reach a solution, such efforts were be described as a clash between an irresistible force doomed to failure because of ignorance of the and an immovable object - Zionism on the one side, national aspirations, traumas, fears and hopes of the the Palestinian people on the other. Palestinian people. Something similar happened on the other side, even if there is no symmetry between 2 Already a fifth generation of Israelis and Palestinians the two sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Obstacles to Peace
    Rehov Tiveria 37 Tel: +972-(0)54-303-9170 Website: www.icahd.org 94543 Jerusalem, Israel E-mail: [email protected] OBSTACLES TO PEACE A REFRAMING OF THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT Written and Presented By Jeff Halper, Director The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) Maps Prepared and Designed By Michael Younan and PalMap of GSE Front Cover Photograph By Anna da Sacco May, 2018 Copyright 2018. This document is protected by international copyrights. If any part of this document is reproduced in any form, acknowledgment should be given to the authors and their affiliated organizations. WHAT IS ICAHD? THE ISRAELI COMMITTEE AGAINST HOUSE DEMOLITIONS The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) is a non-violent Israeli direct-action organization established 2 in 1997 to end Israel’s Occupation over the Palestinians. A grassroots organization, ICAHD has focused on the Big political Picture even while engaging in protest, resistance and informational activities “on the ground.” We seek, together with our Palestinian, Israeli and international partners, to formulate and achieve a genuinely just political settlement to the Israeli- 4 Palestinian “conflict,” one that revolves around the creation of a single democratic state over the entire country. 8 As it name implies, ICAHD takes as the main focus of its resistance Israel’s policy of demolishing Palestinian homes, both in Israel and in the Occupied Territory. A key element of judaization,” of transforming Palestine into the Land of Israel, 9 is the demolition of Palestinian homes and entire communities. During the Nakba some 52,000 Palestinian homes were destroyed, more than 530 villages, towns and urban neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedos Symposium
    218/97 EDITORIAL BOOKS In the first article of our September issue, a native Baum, Gregory, and Harold Wells, eds., African missionary, Fr ROGATH KIMARYO, The Reconciliation of Peoples, CSSp, presents some critical reflections on how the Challenge to the Churches, mentality of dependency on outside help continues to WCC Publications 1997. have a paralysing effect on African communities. — In April, SEDOS organised an activity on the Duraisingh, Christopher, ed. situation in the Middle East. Mr AFIF SAFIEH, the Called to One Hope, Palestinian General Delegate to the UK and Director The Gospel in Diverse Cultures: of the Office of Representation of the PLO to the Report of the 1996 World Mission Conference, Holy See, showed us what a serious strain the once WCC Publications, 1997. hopeful peace process is under. — Fr EUGÈNE JUGUET, MEP, for many years a Jones, Marge, and E. Grant Jones, missionary in Japan, presents a really enlightening Psychology of Missionary Adjustment, article on the urgent need for liberation from that Marc Publications. new totalitarianism called ‘liberté du marché’. — Fr JAMES KROEGER, MM, offers a few pages Raiser, Konrad, which are of especial interest to Asian readers. He To be the Church, resumes the highlights of the first international gath- Challenges and Hopes for a New Millennium, ering of the Missionary Societies of Apostolic Life WCC Publications, 1997. (SALs) which are native to or working in Asia. — Fr JOHN MANSFORD PRIOR, SVD, based on Strahm, Doris, his long missionary and teaching experience in Die Christusbilder der Frauen, Indonesia formulates possibilities for a deeper Christologie aus der Sicht von Frauen in Asien, inculturation of Christian faith and liturgy.
    [Show full text]
  • As Media Seminar on Middle East Peace Opens in Budapest, UN Commu
    As Media Seminar on Middle East Peace Opens in Budapest, UN Commu... http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2011/pal2143.doc.htm 12 July 2011 Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York AS MEDIA SEMINAR ON MIDDLE EAST PEACE OPENS IN BUDAPEST, UN COMMUNICATIONS CHIEF CITES SMALL BUT VIBRANT PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE MOVEMENT BETWEEN ISRAELIS, PALESTINIANS He Calls on Media Makers to Help Combat Narratives Of ’Fear, Hostility and Violence’ that Hamper Progress (Received from a UN Information Officer.) BUDAPEST, 12 July — Welcoming journalists and creators of fiction, theatre and music this morning to a seminar in Budapest, Hungary, on the media’s vital role in resolving the Middle East conflict, the United Nations communications Chief called on them to further utilize their talents to help counter narratives of “fear, hostility and violence” that reified the standstill in the peace process. “While a virtual stalemate prevails on the diplomatic front, there is a small but vibrant people- to-people movement taking place between Israelis and Palestinians. One of the main forces of this people-to-people movement is cooperation on the ground in art and culture,” Kiyo Akasaka, Under- Secretary-General for Communications and Public Information, told participants at the opening of the two-day International Media Seminar on Peace in the Middle East, organized by the United Nations Department of Public Information. “Writers, musicians and filmmakers are crafting a new narrative that reflects the shared experiences and common destiny of peoples on both sides. There is enormous potential for culture and media to further contribute to building peace on the ground through interpersonal contacts,” Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in GAZA Today Indifference of the World
    Life in GAZA Today A collection of paintings by Christian and Muslim children and adult artists who live in Gaza Catalogue Indifference of the World Mohammad Al Amrani – Aged 15 years 1 Introduction In December 2008 the Israeli Defense Forces invaded the tiny pocket of land on the eastern Mediterranean Sea known as the Gaza Strip killing approximately 1400 residents and wounding thousands more. Having wreaked great destruction and death on the area the military then withdrew and tightened again its close cordon of control around all aspects of life in the Gaza Strip which had been in place for two years. Israel continues to control the borders of Gaza, and controls all movement and trade with the outside world. Gaza’s seaport is closed and its airport bombed. All access to the population of 1.5million (over half of whom are children) including humanitarian aid, all food and water, construction supplies and medical equipment and supplies is closely controlled by Israel. These two experiences of ‘the war’ and ‘the siege’ have defined life for the people in Gaza. What is it like to live under such conditions? What do ordinary people experience? How do they cope and what do they long for? Can we hear the voice of ordinary Gazan people through the razor wire of the border fences and the blackout of everyday news and gossip from one of the poorest, most densely populated and most heavily controlled places on the planet? The Major Issues and Theology Foundation (MIAT) believes that one way we can do this is through art.
    [Show full text]