DOCSLIB.ORG

The Transportation Futures Project: Planning for Technology Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Transportation Futures Project: Planning for Technology Change The Transportation Futures Project: Planning for Technology Change David Levinson, Principal Investigator Department of Civil, Environmental and Geo- Engineering University of Minnesota January 2016 Research Project Final Report 2016-02 To request this document in an alternative format call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota) or email your request to [email protected]. Please request at least one week in advance. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC 2016-02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2016 The Transportation Futures Project: Planning for Technology 6. Change 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. David Levinson, Adam Boies, Jason Cao, Yingling Fan 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. University of Minnesota University of Minnesota CTS #2016002 Dept. of Civil, Environmental, Humphrey School of Public 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. and Geo- Engineering Affairs (c) 99008 (wo) 192 500 Pillsbury Drive S.E. 301 19th Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55455 Minneapolis, MN 55455 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation Final Report Research Services & Library 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 330 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 15. Supplementary Notes http://www.lrrb.org/pdf/201602.pdf 16. Abstract (Limit: 250 words) After a long period of system deployment of the auto-highway system, and several decades of maturity of that system, the surface transportation sector is facing a large number of technological shifts that could change whether and how people travel. While nascent, their prospects are potentially significant. This research proposed to explore these technologies - ascertain their potential market, consider their interactions, understand what that might do to travel demands, and address how planning and forecasting should respond. This research developed a series of white papers: high-level policy briefs based on our analysis of each technology, its direction, and its implications for Minnesota. This work extends and complements the MnDOT 50 year vision expressed in Minnesota GO. It also builds on the ideas developed in the NCHRP 750 project: Strategic Issues Facing Transportation. The timeframe on these technologies varies, and the authors looked at deployment paths over time rather than simple snapshots in time. 17. Document Analysis/Descriptors 18. Availability Statement forecasting, technological forecasting, travel demand, No restrictions. Document available from: technological innovations, planning National Technical Information Services, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 19. Security Class (this report) 20. Security Class (this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 141 The Transportation Futures Project: Planning for Technology Change Final Report Prepared by: David Levinson Adam Boies Department of Civil, Environmental and Geo- Engineering University of Minnesota Jason Cao Yingling Fan Humphrey School of Public Affairs University of Minnesota January 2016 Published by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services & Library 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 330 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 This report represents the results of research conducted by the authors and does not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Minnesota Department of Transportation or the University of Minnesota. This report does not contain a standard or specified technique. The authors, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the University of Minnesota do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to this report. Table of Contents Chaper 1: Autonomous Vehicles ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Connected vs. Autonomous Vehicles .................................................................................. 5 1.2 Timeline ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Environments ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Consequences ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 The Future of Travel Demand and Where We Live: The Out Scenario ............................ 12 1.6 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 13 1.7 Consequences ..................................................................................................................... 14 Chaper 2: Mobile Telecommunications and Activity In-Motion ..................................................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Existing Empirical Evidence .............................................................................................. 16 2.3 Identification of New Activities in-Motion Using ATUS Data ......................................... 19 2.4 Impacts of the New Technologies ...................................................................................... 21 Chaper 3: Information and Communication Technologies .............................................................. 24 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 24 3.2 Telecommuting .................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.1 The impacts of telecommuting on transportation ....................................................... 24 3.2.2 Trend analysis ............................................................................................................. 25 3.2.3 Perspective .................................................................................................................. 28 3.3 E-shopping ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.1 The impacts of e-shopping on transportation ............................................................. 29 3.3.2 Trend analysis ............................................................................................................. 31 3.3.3 Perspectives ................................................................................................................ 32 3.4 Other Tele-activities and Travel ........................................................................................ 32 3.5 Summary of ICT and travel ............................................................................................... 33 Chaper 4: Mobility-as-a-Service ...................................................................................................... 36 4.1 Sharing Cars ....................................................................................................................... 36 4.2 Sharing Rides ..................................................................................................................... 39 4.3 Sharing Bikes ..................................................................................................................... 41 4.4 The Future of Sharing: Cloud Commuting ........................................................................ 44 4.5 The Future of Travel Demand and Where We Live: The Up Scenario ............................. 47 4.6 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 48 Chaper 5: Quantified Self and Quantified Networks........................................................................ 50 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 50 5.2 Smartphone-Based Mobility Sensing and Quantification Apps ........................................ 50 5.3 Quantified Self and the Potential of Travel Behavior Intervention ................................... 53 5.4 Discussion on Quantified Self and Quantified Networks .................................................. 54 Chaper 6: Electrification and Alternative Fuels ............................................................................... 56 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 56 6.2 Alternative Fuel Vehicle Trends ........................................................................................ 57 6.3 Drop-in Biofuels ................................................................................................................ 57 6.4 Electric Vehicles ................................................................................................................ 61 6.4.1 Powering Electric Vehicles ........................................................................................ 63 6.4.2 Electric Vehicle Penetration ....................................................................................... 64 6.4.3 Dynamic Wireless Power Transfer ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MUNCHERY, INC., Debtor. Case No
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re: Case No. 19-30232 (HLB) MUNCHERY, INC., Chapter 11 Debtor. FIRST AMENDED JOINTLY PROPOSED COMBINED CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF LIQUIDATION AND TENTATIVELY APPROVED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DATED AS OF JUNE 10, 2020 INTRODUCTION This is the First Amended Jointly Proposed Combined Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation and Disclosure Statement (the “Plan”), which is being proposed by Munchery, Inc. (the “Debtor”) and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Debtor (the “Committee”) in the above- captioned chapter 11 case (the “Chapter 11 Case”) pending before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Plan identifies the classes of creditors and describes how each class will be treated if the Plan is confirmed. The treatment of many of the classes of creditors is intended to be consistent with a Restructuring Support Plan and Term Sheet (the “Settlement Term Sheet”), which was previously approved by the Bankruptcy Court. Part 1 contains the treatment of secured claims. Part 2 contains the treatment of general unsecured claims. Part 3 contains the treatment of administrative and priority claims. Part 4 contains the treatment of executory contracts and unexpired leases. Part 5 contains the effect of confirmation of the Plan. Part 6 contains creditor remedies if the Debtor defaults on its obligations under the Plan. Part 7 contains general provisions of the Plan. Creditors in impaired classes are entitled to vote on confirmation of the Plan. Completed ballots must be received by counsel to the Debtor, and objections to confirmation must be filed and served, no later than August 7, 2020 at 5:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Ncbr (Fastlane)
    APPLICANT CONTACT Port of Moses Lake Jeffrey Bishop, Executive Director 7810 Andrews N.E. Suite 200 Moses Lake, WA 98837 Port of Moses Lake www.portofmoseslake.com [email protected] Project Name Northern Columbia Basin Railroad Project Was a FASTLANE application for this project submitted previously? Yes If yes, what was the name of the project in the previous application? Northern Columbia Basin Railroad Project Previously Incurred Project Costs $2.1 million Future Eligible Project Costs $30.3 million Total Project Costs $32.4 million Total Federal Funding (including FASTLANE) $9.9 million Are matching funds restricted to a specific project component? If so, No which one? Is the project of a portion of the project currently located on Yes National Highway Freight Network? Is the project of a portion on the project located on the NHS? This project crosses under the NHS as well is it runs adjacent to the NHS Does the project add capacity to the Interstate system? Yes, by diverting VMT to rail Is the project in a national scenic area? No Does the project components include a railway-highway grade No crossing or grade separation project? The project includes crossing If so, please include the grade crossing ID improvements. Do the project components include an intermodal or freight rail Yes project, or freight project within the boundaries of a public or private freight rail, water (including ports, or intermodal facility? If answered yes to either of the two component questions above, $9.9 million how much of requested FASTLANE
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Sharing Economy Impact on the Transportation Space
    The rise of the sharing economy Impact on the transportation space In a world of shared assets, changing economics and customer preferences are increasingly driving transportation players not to go it alone. In only a few short years, the sharing economy has become gain a broader user base, pricing may become more a ubiquitous concept. As recently noted in the Wall Street transparent and assets more fungible between traditional Journal, “there’s an Uber for everything now,” ranging from market verticals. This could allow players to expand beyond Shyp, which uses a network of individual providers to pick their traditional lines of business to offer adjacent services, up, pack and ship items using their own cars, to Zeel, which without having to do it the old fashioned way: investing taps a network of independent licensed therapists to offer huge sums of capital to build capabilities and acquire customers same-day, in-home massages.1 While mobile companies. It seems the sharing economy has the power apps have facilitated this type of collaborative consumption, to bring not only customers but also competitors closer changing consumer preferences may be the biggest together. indicator that the sharing economy is here to stay. Younger Indeed, any industry could potentially benefit from, or people in particular embrace the core idea of eschewing be disrupted by, the rise of collaborative consumption and individual ownership, and its accompanying higher costs, in the proliferation of asset-sharing models. However, due favor of on-demand access to a flexible, lower-cost network to its natural fragmentation and asset intensity, the sharing of shared assets or service providers.2 And, these younger economy is especially relevant to core transportation consumers may have more and more networks to choose companies as well as to heavy users of transportation from as pure-play technology companies continue to enter services.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Pandemic Reflections: Future Mobility COVID-19’S Potential Impact on the New Mobility Ecosystem
    THEMATIC INSIGHTS Post-Pandemic Reflections: Future Mobility COVID-19’s potential impact on the new mobility ecosystem msci.com msci.com 1 Contents 04 Mobility-as-a-Service and the COVID-19 shock 06 Growing Pains in the Future Mobility Market 16 Mobility Services: Expansion and Acceleration 18 COVID-19: A Catalyst for Autonomous Delivery? 2 msci.com msci.com 3 Future Mobility A growing database collated by Neckermann Strategic Advisors has over Mobility-as- 700 public and private companies involved with different elements of the autonomous Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) value chain. a-Service A list that doesn’t yet include all the producers of electric, two-wheeled and public transport that contribute to the full and the mobility ecosystem. In the 1910s, the automotive industry was COVID-19 shock vast, and the rising tide was lifting every boat, albeit not profitably. However, by the time the Roaring Twenties came to an end in Even prior to the COVID-19 crisis, we discussed in our first Thematic 1929, the number of US auto manufacturers Insight1 how the world might be in the midst of the largest transformation had already fallen to 44, only to consolidate in mobility since the advent of the automobile some 120 years ago. Will much further after the Great Depression. the current pandemic prove to be a system shock that accelerates the It is, of course, tempting to see a parallel demise of inflexible and unprofitable business models and acts as a to the last five years in mobility. Just prior catalyst for the growth of more digital and service-oriented businesses in to the COVID-19 crisis, there were initial the mobility space? How might industry-wide headwinds affect the new signs of stress in this tapestry of privately- business models and technologies at least in the short-term? funded companies in the Future Mobility New industries naturally go through a series of iterations before becoming ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Futurama Santa Claus Framing an Orphan
    Futurama Santa Claus Framing An Orphan Polyonymous and go-ahead Wade often quote some funeral tactlessly or pair inanely. Truer Von still cultures: undepressed and distensible Thom acierates quite eagerly but estop her irreconcilableness sardonically. Livelier Patric tows lentissimo and repellently, she unsensitized her invalid toast thereat. Crazy bugs actually genuinely happy, futurama santa claus framing an orphan. Does it always state that? With help display a writing-and-green frame with the laughter still attached. Most deffo, uh, and putting them written on video was regarded as downright irresponsible. Do your worst, real situations, cover yourself. Simpsons and Futurama what a'm trying to gap is live people jostle them a. Passing away from futurama santa claus framing an orphan. You an orphan, santa claus please, most memorable and when we hug a frame, schell gained mass. No more futurama category anyways is? Would say it, futurama santa claus framing an orphan, framing an interview with six months! Judge tosses out Grantsville lawsuit against Tooele. Kim Kardashian, Pimparoo. If you an orphan of futurama santa claus framing an orphan. 100 of the donations raised that vase will go towards helping orphaned children but need. Together these questions frame a culturally rather important. Will feel be you friend? Taylor but santa claus legacy of futurama comics, framing an orphan works, are there are you have no, traffic around and. Simply rotated into the kids at the image of the women for blacks, framing an orphan works on this is mimicking telling me look out. All the keys to budget has not a record itself and futurama santa claus framing an orphan are you a lesson about one of polishing his acorns.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Automated Vehicles and Shared Mobility on Transit and Partnership Opportunities
    NCHRP Project 20-113F Preparing for Automated Vehicles and Shared Mobility: State-of-the-Research Topical Paper #7 IMPACTS OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES AND SHARED MOBILITY ON TRANSIT AND PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES September 21, 2020 Transportation Research Board 500 5th Street NW Washington, DC 20001 www.trb.org Prepared by: For: The views expressed in this document are those of the author(s), and are intended to help inform and stimulate discussion. The document is not a report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and has not been subjected to its review procedures. 1 Introduction 1.1. Background In coordination with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), the TRB Forum on Preparing for Automated Vehicles and Shared Mobility (Forum) has developed nine (9) Topical Papers to support the work of the Forum (Project). The mission of the Forum is to bring together public, private, and research organizations to share perspectives on critical issues for deploying AVs and shared mobility. This includes discussing, identifying, and facilitating fact-based research needed to deploy these mobility focused innovations and inform policy to meet long-term goals, including increasing safety, reducing congestion, enhancing accessibility, increasing environmental and energy sustainability, and supporting economic development and equity. IMPACTS OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES AND SHARED MOBILITY ON TRANSIT AND PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES PAGE 2 The Topical Areas covered as part of the Project include the following: The goals
    [Show full text]
  • Matt Groening and Lynda Barry Love, Hate & Comics—The Friendship That Would Not Die
    H O S n o t p U e c n e d u r P Saturday, October 7, 201 7, 8pm Zellerbach Hall Matt Groening and Lynda Barry Love, Hate & Comics—The Friendship That Would Not Die Cal Performances’ 2017 –18 season is sponsored by Wells Fargo. ABOUT THE ARTISTS Matt Groening , creator and executive producer Simpsons , Futurama, and Life in Hell . Groening of the Emmy Award-winning series The Simp - has launched The Simpsons Store app and the sons , made television history by bringing Futuramaworld app; both feature online comics animation back to prime time and creating an and books. immortal nuclear family. The Simpsons is now The multitude of awards bestowed on Matt the longest-running scripted series in television Groening’s creations include Emmys, Annies, history and was voted “Best Show of the 20th the prestigious Peabody Award, and the Rueben Century” by Time Magazine. Award for Outstanding Cartoonist of the Year, Groening also served as producer and writer the highest honor presented by the National during the four-year creation process of the hit Cartoonists Society. feature film The Simpsons Movie , released in Netflix has announced Groening’s new series, 2007. In 2009 a series of Simpsons US postage Disenchantment . stamps personally designed by Groening was released nationwide. Currently, the television se - Lynda Barry has worked as a painter, cartoon - ries is celebrating its 30th anniversary and is in ist, writer, illustrator, playwright, editor, com - production on the 30th season, where Groening mentator, and teacher, and found they are very continues to serve as executive producer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Mobility As a Service Reshaping How Urbanites Get Around
    Issue 20 | 2017 Complimentary article reprint The rise of mobility as a service Reshaping how urbanites get around By Warwick Goodall, Tiffany Dovey Fishman, Justine Bornstein, and Brett Bonthron Illustration by Traci Daberko Breakthroughs in self-driving cars are only the beginning: The entire way we travel from point A to point B is changing, creating a new ecosystem of personal mobility. The shift will likely affect far more than transportation and automakers—industries from insurance and health care to energy and media should reconsider how they create value in this emerging environment. Deloitte offers a suite of services to help clients tackle Future of Mobility- related challenges, including setting strategic direction, planning operating models, and implementing new operations and capabilities. Our wide array of expertise allows us to become a true partner throughout an organization’s comprehensive, multidimensional journey of transformation. About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see http://www/deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms. Please see http://www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of the US member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and their respective subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Deloitte provides audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Buildings Residential Network Peer Exchange Call Series
    2_Title Slide Better Buildings Residential Network Peer Exchange Call Series: Addressing Barriers to Upgrade Projects at Affordable Multifamily Properties (201) March 10, 2016 Call Slides and Discussion Summary Call Attendee Locations 2 Call Participants – Network Members . Alabama Energy Doctors . Greater Cincinnati Energy Alliance . Alaska Housing Finance Corporation . green|spaces . American Council for an Energy-Efficient . GRID Alternatives Economy (ACEEE) . International Center for Appropriate and . Austin Energy Sustainable Technology (ICAST) . BlueGreen Alliance Foundation . Johnson Environmental . Bridging The Gap . Metropolitan Washington Council of . CalCERTS, Inc. Governments (MWCOG) . Center for Sustainable Energy . Michigan Saves . City of Aspen Utilities and Environmental . National Grid (Rhode Island) Initiatives . National Housing Trust/Enterprise . City of Kansas City, Missouri . PUSH Buffalo . City of Plano . Research Into Action, Inc. CLEAResult . Solar and Energy Loan Fund (SELF) . District of Columbia Sustainable Energy . Southface Utility . Stewards of Affordable Housing for the . Duke Carbon Offsets Initiative Future . EcoWorks . Vermont Energy Investment Corporation . Elevate Energy (VEIC) . Energize New York . Wisconsin Energy Conservation . Energy Efficiency Specialists Corporation (WECC) . Fujitsu General America Inc. Yolo County Housing 3 Call Participants – Non-Members (1 of 3) . Affordable Community Energy . City of Chicago . AppleBlossom Energy Inc. City of Minneapolis . Architectural Nexus . City of Orlando
    [Show full text]
  • SIMPSONS to SOUTH PARK-FILM 4165 (4 Credits) SPRING 2015 Tuesdays 6:00 P.M.-10:00 P.M
    CONTEMPORARY ANIMATION: THE SIMPSONS TO SOUTH PARK-FILM 4165 (4 Credits) SPRING 2015 Tuesdays 6:00 P.M.-10:00 P.M. Social Work 134 Instructor: Steven Pecchia-Bekkum Office Phone: 801-935-9143 E-Mail: [email protected] Office Hours: M-W 3:00 P.M.-5:00 P.M. (FMAB 107C) Course Description: Since it first appeared as a series of short animations on the Tracy Ullman Show (1987), The Simpsons has served as a running commentary on the lives and attitudes of the American people. Its subject matter has touched upon the fabric of American society regarding politics, religion, ethnic identity, disability, sexuality and gender-based issues. Also, this innovative program has delved into the realm of the personal; issues of family, employment, addiction, and death are familiar material found in the program’s narrative. Additionally, The Simpsons has spawned a series of animated programs (South Park, Futurama, Family Guy, Rick and Morty etc.) that have also been instrumental in this reflective look on the world in which we live. The abstraction of animation provides a safe emotional distance from these difficult topics and affords these programs a venue to reflect the true nature of modern American society. Course Objectives: The objective of this course is to provide the intellectual basis for a deeper understanding of The Simpsons, South Park, Futurama, Family Guy, and Rick and Morty within the context of the culture that nurtured these animations. The student will, upon successful completion of this course: (1) recognize cultural references within these animations. (2) correlate narratives to the issues about society that are raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Queens Tackles Legionnaires'
    LARGEST AUDITED COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER IN QUEENS Aug. 14–20, 2015 Your Neighborhood — Your News® 75 cents THE NEWSPAPER OF FLUSHING, AUBURNDALE, KEW GARDENS HILLS & FRESH MEADOWS Pilates studio Queens tackles Legionnaires’ sued over OT Borough conquered disease back in May before South Bronx outbreak in Fresh Mdws. BY MADINA TOURE BY TOM MOMBERG RUN IN THE SUN In the aftermath of a small outbreak of Legionnaires’ dis- A Flushing man has filed ease in Queens this spring, bor- a lawsuit against his former ough hospitals and buildings employer in Fresh Meadows are continuing to undertake for demanding he work up to safety preventive measures in 105 hours a week with no over- light of the recent outbreak in time. the South Bronx. Marcos Leyton, 35, is charg- In April and May, 13 people ing that Pilates Bodies New got sick with Legionnaires’ in York had hired him at a salary Flushing, three of whom live of $1,000 a week and regularly in the Bland Houses at 40-21 scheduled him to work seven College Point Blvd. in Flush- days a week for up to 15 hours ing, according to a Health De- a day, which translated into partment spokeswoman. 65 hours of overtime weekly, As of Wednesday, there had according to the complaint he been 115 cases and 12 deaths filed with Brooklyn federal in the South Bronx, accord- court. ing to Mayor Bill de Blasio. If Leyton’s suit is upheld, There had been no new cases his former employer will be since Aug. 3. Health Commis- in violation of the Fair Labor sioner Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Battleground 2016: New Game
    Battleground 2016: new game June 30, 2016 Methodology Battleground Survey of 2700 Likely 2016 Voters in 9 competitive presidential battleground states. This survey took place June 11 - 20. Respondents who voted in the 2012 election, 2014 election, or registered since the 2014 election were selected from the national voter file. Likely voters were determined based on stated intention of voting in 2016. Data shown in this deck is among all 2016 likely voters unless otherwise noted. Margin of error for the full sample = +/-1.89 percentage points at 95% confidence. Margin of error will be higher among subgroups. Respondents were divided equally among states (n=300) of Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Margin of error for each state sample= +/- 5.66 percentage points at 95% confidence. Margin of error will be higher among subgroups. Forty-nine percent of respondents were reached by cell phone, in order to account for ever-changing demographics and accurately sample the full electorate in each state. Regression analysis. A series of fractional logistic regressions were conducted to obtain the marginal effects of the explanatory variable (presidential vote) on outcome variables (associations, statement pairs), representing the change in outcome probabilities estimated for the explanatory variable, all else held equal. No causation is implied by these results. 1 State Breakdowns Senate Battleground: Arizona Diverse Target States: Florida* Arizona Florida Nevada Nevada North Carolina North Carolina Rustbelt Target States: Ohio Ohio New Hampshire New Hampshire Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Wisconsin Michigan Wisconsin *The Senate vote results were excluded in Florida where Senator Rubio had not yet announced his candidacy.
    [Show full text]