This Article Was Found in USC-Owned Library Materials and Was Paged

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Article Was Found in USC-Owned Library Materials and Was Paged This article was found in USC‐owned library materials and was paged and scanned courtesy IDD Document Delivery. For more information about IDD services, please visit: http://usc.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/faqs.html COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The copy law of the United States (Title 17 U.S. Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship or research”. Note that in the case of electronic files, “reproduction” may also include forwarding the file by email to a third party. If a user makes a request for, or later uses a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use”, that user may be liable for copyright infringement. USC reserves the right to refuse to process a request if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. By using USC’s Integrated Document Delivery (IDD) services you expressly agree to comply with Copyright Law. University of Southern California USC Libraries Integrated Document Delivery (IDD) (213) 740‐4020 [email protected] ____________ The Battle for China ESSAYS ON THE MILITARY HISTORY OF THE SINO-JAPANESE WAR OF I937-I945 Edited by Mark Peattie, Edward]. Drea, and Hans van de Ven STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 11111111111111111 IIIII II There is no instance < Stanford University Press from prolonged wart Stanford, California -Sunzi ©2orr by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permis­ sion of Stanford University Press. Maps produced by David Rennie. Japan photographs reproduced with permission of AFLO/Mainichi Shimbun. Printed in the United States of America on acid-free, archival-quality paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The battle for China : essays on the military history of the Sino-Japanese War of I937-I945 I edited by Mark Peattie, Edward Drea, and Hans van de Ven. p. em. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-o-8047-6206-9 (cloth: alk. paper) r. Sino-Japanese War, I937-r945-Campaigns-China. 2. China­ History, Military-r9r2-r949· 3· Japan-History, Military-r868-I945· I. Peattie, Mark R., r930- II. Drea, Edward J., r944- III. Van de Ven, HansJ. DS777·53·B337 20II 940·54'2p-dC22 20r0042047 Typeset by BookMatters in ro/12.5 Sabon THE DR resentment at thirty years of fore: 2 The Dragon~s Seed the utter defeat of the court and th expeditions ended in the Boxer F ORIGINS OF THE WAR stipulations, authorized foreign tr tioned at key points from Peking t MARK R. PEATTIE It has been customary in Weste in terms of a traditional emeute aJ Protocols as the nadir of China's f ring the ashes of China's defeat, upheaval as less a rebellion than a tory-a war between China and 1 Chinese patriotism, the beginning tance to the Japanese invader fort) cannot be denied that control ove1 weakened; its ports, rivers, and ec The seeds of the conflict can be found as early as the nineteenth century, 1 eign control; and a legacy of nati rooted in the soil of imperial China, an agrarian bureaucratic empire whose would bear bitter fruit in the new c institutional inadequacies at a time of gathering economic, demographic, and technological change complicated its efforts to preserve domestic tran­ quility within the country and made difficult China_'s resista.nce to for­ Japan's Encroachments in China eign encroachment from without. 2 Lacking strong allies and firm control The encroachments by West, over its border regions and peoples, and suspicious as to the nature and been undertaken by nations half a intentions of foreign powers standing on its frontiers and approaching its was checked by time and distancf coasts China was unable to halt the pace and scale of the incursions on a fellow Asian neighbor. But Japa its and territory in the last three decades of the nineteenth sov~reignty cen~ latter half of the nineteenth centuq tury: Japan's invasion of Taiwan, r87o-r87r; Russia's occupation ~f the lh sive attitude toward national expan Valley in Xinjiang Province in r879; the loss of Annam to France m r885; demands of Japanese self-interest. C and, most painful and serious, the calamitous war with Japan over Korea, depended on an outer cordon of sa r894-r895, in which Chinese forces were defeated on land and se~ and Japan's political and military leadf after which Korea was stripped from China as a tributary, and Taiwan, the Asian mainland, beginning wit the Liaodong Peninsula, and the Pescadores were ceded to Japan. After strategic priorities shifted in the L that further humiliations followed one after another: French demands Japanese coastline to an active poli to adjust the Sino-Annamite border; Germany's seizure of Jiaozhou Bay tinent, it acquired a lethal potenti on the southern coast of the Shandong Peninsula; British demands for an Japan had been on a collision cours' offsetting port at Weihaiwei on the northern coast of the same peninsula; to defend its position in Korea. Th French demands for a leasehold at Guangzhou on the southern China armed forces during the Sino-Japa coast demands that provoked a British expansion into the Kowloon "New led to the loss of territories menti, Terri;ories" opposite Hong Kong. Most of these new foreign enclaves were policies on the continent and stren~ surrounded by zones and spheres where each foreign controllin? p~wer capacities.4 Yet by the decade that fc held exclusive rights for extractive industries and modern commumcatwns. Boxer Protocols, Japan came to pla Then with the opening of the new century had come the disastrous deci­ ty's effort to save itself through refo1 sion of the Qing court to encourage and support the spasm of antiforeign to gain a dominant position on the violence led by the Boxers, an initiative explicable by the depth of popular While the Qing had suffered a THE DRAGON'S SEED 49 resentment at thirty years of foreign humiliation of China. At all events, the utter defeat of the court and the Boxers by coordinated foreign military expeditions ended in the Boxer Protocols, which, among other punitive stipulations, authorized foreign troops, including the Japanese, to be sta­ tioned at key points from Peking to the sea. It has been customary in Western literature to view the Boxer upheaval in terms of a traditional emeute and China's punishment under the Boxer Protocols as the nadir of China's fortunes in its modern history. Yet, stir­ ring the ashes of China's defeat, historians have come to see the Boxer upheaval as less a rebellion than a serious episode in China's military his­ tory-a war between China and the West, one that gave voice to a new Chinese patriotism, the beginnings of a nationalism essential to the resis­ tance to the Japanese invader forty years on. In the meantime, however, it cannot be denied that control over China's borderlands had been further weakened; its ports, rivers, and economic resources had fallen under for­ i as early as the nineteenth century, 1 eign control; and a legacy of national resentment had accumulated that 1 agrarian bureaucratic empire whose would bear bitter fruit in the new century. f gathering economic, demographic, its efforts to preserve domestic tran- Japan's Encroachments in China, I894-I9I5 ~ difficult China's resistance to for­ lcking strong allies and firm control The encroachments by Western powers on Chinese sovereignty had and suspicious as to the nature and been undertaken by nations half a globe away whose full strategic reach ; on its frontiers and approaching its was checked by time and distance. Japan, on the other hand, had been pace and scale of the incursions on a fellow Asian neighbor. But Japan's own modern transformation in the :three decades of the nineteenth cen­ latter half of the nineteenth century had brought with it a new and aggres­ )-1871; Russia's occupation of the Ili sive attitude toward national expansion, an outlook framed by the tigerish he loss of Annam to France in 1885; demands of Japanese self-interest. Convinced that Japan's national security amitous war with Japan over Korea, depended on an outer cordon of satellite territory on the Asian continent, were defeated on land and sea and Japan's political and military leadership had sought to control events on 1 China as a tributary, and Taiwan, the Asian mainland, beginning with the Korean peninsula.3 Once Japan's cadores were ceded to Japan. After strategic priorities shifted in the late 188os from passive defense of the one after another: French demands Japanese coastline to an active political and military presence on the con­ Germany's seizure of Jiaozhou Bay tinent, it acquired a lethal potential. By the last decade of the century, lg Peninsula; British demands for an Japan had been on a collision course with a belated Chinese determination orthern coast of the same peninsula; to defend its position in Korea. The disasters that had overtaken China's Guangzhou on the southern China armed forces during the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895 had not only h expansion into the Kowloon "New led to the loss of territories mentioned above but emboldened Japanese st of these new foreign enclaves were policies on the continent and strengthened Japanese contempt for China's 1ere each foreign controlling power capacities.4 Yet by the decade that followed the punitive humiliations of the ustries and modern communications.
Recommended publications
  • The Chinese Civil War (1927–37 and 1946–49)
    13 CIVIL WAR CASE STUDY 2: THE CHINESE CIVIL WAR (1927–37 AND 1946–49) As you read this chapter you need to focus on the following essay questions: • Analyze the causes of the Chinese Civil War. • To what extent was the communist victory in China due to the use of guerrilla warfare? • In what ways was the Chinese Civil War a revolutionary war? For the first half of the 20th century, China faced political chaos. Following a revolution in 1911, which overthrew the Manchu dynasty, the new Republic failed to take hold and China continued to be exploited by foreign powers, lacking any strong central government. The Chinese Civil War was an attempt by two ideologically opposed forces – the nationalists and the communists – to see who would ultimately be able to restore order and regain central control over China. The struggle between these two forces, which officially started in 1927, was interrupted by the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese war in 1937, but started again in 1946 once the war with Japan was over. The results of this war were to have a major effect not just on China itself, but also on the international stage. Mao Zedong, the communist Timeline of events – 1911–27 victor of the Chinese Civil War. 1911 Double Tenth Revolution and establishment of the Chinese Republic 1912 Dr Sun Yixian becomes Provisional President of the Republic. Guomindang (GMD) formed and wins majority in parliament. Sun resigns and Yuan Shikai declared provisional president 1915 Japan’s Twenty-One Demands. Yuan attempts to become Emperor 1916 Yuan dies/warlord era begins 1917 Sun attempts to set up republic in Guangzhou.
    [Show full text]
  • How China Started the Second Sino-Japanese War: Why Should Japan Apologize to China?
    How China Started the Second Sino-Japanese War: Why Should Japan Apologize to China? By Moteki Hiromichi Society for the Dissemination of Historical Facts © 1 Introduction In the so-called "apology issue," which concerns Japan's conduct in China during the Second Sino-Japanese War, there exists two opposing points of view: "I guess the only thing we can do is to keep on apologizing until China tells us, 'The problems between us may not be settled, but for now you have sufficiently apologized.'" -Murakami Haruki1 "A grateful China should also pay respect to Yasukuni Shrine." -Ko Bunyu2 Mr. Murakami's opinion is based on the belief that Japan waged an aggressive war against China, a belief shared by many Japanese even if they don't know the reason why. This belief holds that the Japanese should be completely repentant over that act of aggression for the sake of clearing our own conscience. There are two major problems with this point of view. First of all, it rests on the conventional wisdom that Japan was guilty of aggression towards China. Many people will perhaps respond to that by saying something like, "What are you talking about? The Japanese Army invaded continental China and waged war there. Surely that constitutes a war of aggression." However, let's imagine the following scenario. What if the Japan Self-Defense Forces launched an unprovoked attack on American military units, which are stationed in Japan in accordance with the provisions of the US-Japan Security Treaty, and a war broke out on Japanese territory? Because the fighting would be taking place in Japan, does that mean that, in this scenario, the US Army is undeniably the aggressor? No matter how distasteful a person might find the US military presence to be, under international law, Japan would be deemed the aggressor here.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 JOMSA Only Foreign Head of State to Receive the Award Was the Taisho Emperor of Japan
    (“Grand Merit Order”) instead of Da Bao Zhang (“Grand President Yuan on the anniversary of the Wuchang Precious Order”). Uprising but declined by Sun The sash for the sash badge (Figure 8) was Imperial • Li Yuanhong – awarded October 10, 1912 by President Yuan to Vice President Li on the anniversary of the yellow) and was worn over the left shoulder.21 The Wuchang Uprising insignia was to be worn on formal dress although it could also be worn with informal attire where required • The Taisho Emperor of Japan – awarded November for diplomacy.22 10, 1915 by President Yuan • Feng Guozhang (Figure 9) – awarded July 6, 1917 by President Li Yuanhong to Vice President Feng • Xu Shichang (Figure 10) – awarded October 10, 1918 by President Xu Shichang to himself on the anniversary of the Wuchang Uprising • Duan Qirui – awarded September 15, 1919 by President Xu Shichang to Premier Duan Qirui • Cao Kun (Figure 11)– awarded October 10, 1923 by President Cao Kun to himself on the anniversary of the Wuchang Uprising • Zhang Zuolin – awarded around 1927 by Zhang Zuolin to himself as Grand Marshal of China24 Seven were presidents (or equivalent, in the case of Zhang Zuolin). Notwithstanding the 1912 Decree, the Grand Order was also awarded to vice-presidents and premiers Figure 8: Illustration of the Republican Grand Order sash badge reverse with the name of the Order (Da Xun Zhang, 大勋章) in seal script. Compare the characters to that of the Imperial Grand Order in Figure 5 (www.gmic.co.uk). The regulations provided for the surrender or return of the insignia upon the death of the recipient, or upon conviction of criminal or other offences.23 Given the chaotic times of the early Republic, this did not necessarily occur in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Reexaminating TERAUCHI Masatake's Character
    February 2019 Issue Reexaminating TERAUCHI Masatake's Character - As a “Statesman”- KANNO Naoki, Cheif, Military Archives, Center for Military History Introduction What comes to mind when you think of TERAUCHI Masatake (1852 - 1919)? For example, at the beginning of the Terauchi Cabinet (October 1616 - September 1918), it was ridiculed as being both anachronistic and a non-constitutional cabinet. Using NISHIHARA Kamezo, also known as Terauchi's private secretary, he provided funds of up to 110 million yen to the Duan Qirui government in northern China (the Nishihara Loans). The so-called Rice Riots broke out in his final year, and Siberian Intervention began. Terauchi was also called a protégé of YAMAGATA Aritomo, the leading authority on Army soldiers from former Choshu domain (Choshu-han). On the other hand, what about the succeeding Hara Cabinet (September 1918 - November 1921)? Exactly 100 years ago, HARA Takashi had already started the cabinet that consists of all political party members, except for the three Ministers of the Army, Navy, and Foreign Affairs. After the World War I, a full-on party politics was developed in Japan as global diplomatic trends drastically changed. Compared to Hara, Terauchi has not been evaluated. After Chinese-Japanese relations deteriorated following the Twenty-One Demands in 1915, the aforementioned Nishihara Loans, implemented for recovery, were over-extended to the only northern part of China, the Duan Qirui government only for a limited time. Then, ultimately, the Loans did not lead an improvement in relationships. Thus it can be said that, until recently, Terauchi's character has been almost entirely neglected by academia.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Operations in Manchuria (9-15 August 1945)
    154 This manuscript may not be reproduced without the permission of the Office of The Chief of Military History RECORD OF OPERATIONS AGAINST SOVIET RUSSIA, EASTERN FRONT (AUGUST 1945) PREFACE I - II Table of Contents Monograph No 154-A CHAPTER I Kwantung Army Operations in Manchuria (9-15 August 1945) Preliminaries to Invasion 1 First Reports of the Soviet Invasion 3 First Estimate of the Situation 8 Change in Plan for the Western Front 10 Transfer of General Headquarters 13 Situation on 12 August 15 The War Ends 19 Cancellation of Operational Missions 23 Dissolution of the IKwantung Army 25 MAPS Following page No 1 Deployment of Japanese and Known Soviet Forces 3 9 August 1945 No 2 Progress of Operations, 2400 9 August 1945 8 No 3 Progress of Operations, 2400 10 August 1945 10 No 4 Progress of Operations, 2400 11 August 1945 15 No 5 Progress of Operations, 2400 12 August 1945 16 No 6 Progress of Operations, 2400 13 August 1945 18 No 7 Progress of Operations, 2400 14 August 1945 19 No 8 Progress of Operations, 2400 15 August 1945 19 No 9 Depth of Soviet Penetration, 15 August 1945 19 CHARTS No 1 Kwantung Army Divisions, 10 August 1945 8 No 2 Organizational Chart of General Headquarters Kwantung Army 20 Monograph No 154-B as CHAPTER II The First Area Army in Eastern Manchuria aage Military Geography of Eastern Manchuria 26 Operational Planning 30 Operational Plans 33 CHAPTER III Composition of Major Units General Structure 39 Third Army 43' Fifth Army 44 CHAPTER IV Status of Preparations Fortifications 46 Revisions in Logistical Planning
    [Show full text]
  • General He Yingqin: the Rise and Fall of Nationalist China. <I>By Peter Worthing</I>
    Pacific Affairs: Volume 90, No. 3 – September 2017 The chapters that frame this volume make clear the different approaches that China and the United States have towards energy security. Ideologically, US and Chinese pursuit of energy security reflect radically differing embedded assumptions. As the authors note, while the US has long advocated markets over mercantilism and institutions that help avoid zero-sum approaches in crisis, China has emphasized securing external supply and developing long- term state-to-state relationships. The cases presented here suggest that the US has not used energy to constrain China’s rise, but neither has it focused on safeguarding the US market vision for energy. This volume strongly illustrates China’s long-term commitment to ensuring its access to adequate energy for the future. Meanwhile, the United States, through the development of its resources at home (and radical shifts in price), has become less engaged in energy development and in the concerns of resource-rich states. How China’s participation will change markets and relations in the long term remains to be seen, but this volume offers rare insight into how China’s participation is progressing to date. National War College/National Defense University Theresa Sabonis-Helf Washington, DC, USA *Views expressed in this review are solely the author’s and do not represent the official position of the US Government, Department of Defense, or the National Defense University. GENERAL HE YINGQIN: The Rise and Fall of Nationalist China. By Peter Worthing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. viii, 316 pp. (Maps.) US$99.99, cloth. ISBN 978-1-107-14463-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Hobsbawm 1990, 66. 2. Diamond 1998, 322–33. 3. Fairbank 1992, 44–45. 4. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1–2. 5. Diamond 1998, 323, original emphasis. 6. Crossley 1999; Di Cosmo 1998; Purdue 2005a; Lavely and Wong 1998, 717. 7. Richards 2003, 112–47; Lattimore 1937; Pan Chia-lin and Taeuber 1952. 8. My usage of the term “geo-body” follows Thongchai 1994. 9. B. Anderson 1991, 86. 10. Purdue 2001, 304. 11. Dreyer 2006, 279–80; Fei Xiaotong 1981, 23–25. 12. Jiang Ping 1994, 16. 13. Morris-Suzuki 1998, 4; Duara 2003; Handler 1988, 6–9. 14. Duara 1995; Duara 2003. 15. Turner 1962, 3. 16. Adelman and Aron 1999, 816. 17. M. Anderson 1996, 4, Anderson’s italics. 18. Fitzgerald 1996a: 136. 19. Ibid., 107. 20. Tsu Jing 2005. 21. R. Wong 2006, 95. 22. Chatterjee (1986) was the first to theorize colonial nationalism as a “derivative discourse” of Western Orientalism. 23. Gladney 1994, 92–95; Harrell 1995a; Schein 2000. 24. Fei Xiaotong 1989, 1. 25. Cohen 1991, 114–25; Schwarcz 1986; Tu Wei-ming 1994. 26. Harrison 2000, 240–43, 83–85; Harrison 2001. 27. Harrison 2000, 83–85; Cohen 1991, 126. 186 • Notes 28. Duara 2003, 9–40. 29. See, for example, Lattimore 1940 and 1962; Forbes 1986; Goldstein 1989; Benson 1990; Lipman 1998; Millward 1998; Purdue 2005a; Mitter 2000; Atwood 2002; Tighe 2005; Reardon-Anderson 2005; Giersch 2006; Crossley, Siu, and Sutton 2006; Gladney 1991, 1994, and 1996; Harrell 1995a and 2001; Brown 1996 and 2004; Cheung Siu-woo 1995 and 2003; Schein 2000; Kulp 2000; Bulag 2002 and 2006; Rossabi 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Railway System
    ASIA THE CHINESE RAILWAY SYSTEM By H. STRINGER CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THE WASON COLLECTION THIS BOOK IS THE GIFT OF Mrs. James McHugh Cornell University Library TF 101.S91 The Chinese railway system / 3 1924 023 644 143 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924023644143 THE CHINESE RAILWAY SYSTEM THE CHINESE RAILWAY SYSTEM By H. STRINGER, b.a., cantab., a.m.lc.e. Resident Engineer, Peking-Mukden Railway. SHANGHAI KELLY AND WALSH, LIMITED. HONGKONG-SINGAPORE-YOKOHAMA-HANKOW. 1922. .. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. Railway History 1 II. Growth of the Railway Administration 27 III. The Government Railway System . 37 IV. Railways in Detail—Year 1918 . 74 V. The Economics of the Chinese Railways 107 VI. Pioneer Railway Location . 143 VII. The Case for Machinery on Railway Construction in China . 161 VIII. The Use of Reinforced Concrete on the Chinese Railways 177 IX. Construction Memoranda Peculiar to China 186 — ;; PREFACE This book is printed by order of the Board of Communications of the Chinese Government. I am greatly indebted to Mr. Tang Wen Kao, Director of the Peking-Mukden Railway and to Mr. L. J. Newmarch, Acting Engineer-in-Chief of the same line for making the necessary arrangements with the Board. The chapter on Pioneer Railway Location may perhaps be criticised as an irrelevancy. It is introduced to direct attention to a question of vast importance to a country which has practically all its railway future still before it, and also because location along pioneer lines is believed to be suited to existing financial conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Compensation for Siberian Detention
    Volume 7 | Issue 48 | Number 1 | Article ID 3261 | Nov 30, 2009 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Compensation for Siberian Detention: Who was Responsible for Abandoning Japanese Soldiers and Settlers in Mainland Asia After World War II? 連載特集 法廷で裁かれる日本の戦争責任40。賠償起訴の 始まり シベリア抑留国家賠償請求起訴日本政府の棄兵、棄民政策を問 う。 Murai Toyoaki Lawsuit Seeks Japanese Government Declaration—August 15, 19453—the Soviet Compensation for SiberianUnion declared war against Japan on August 8, Detention: Who was Responsible for 1945, renouncing the Japan-Soviet Neutrality Treaty of 1941. The USSR immediately crossed Abandoning Japanese Soldiers and the borders of northeast China (Manchuria), Settlers in Mainland Asia After northern Korea, and southern Sakhalin (which World War II? were all Japanese colonies), and the Kuril Islands. They engaged in combat with the Japanese army in these areas. Even after the Murai Toyoaki Potsdam Declaration’s de facto ending of World War II, fighting between Japan and the Soviet Nobuko ADACHI translator Union continued through early September until Why Compensation? a cease fire was declared. 4 We submitted a “Request for Compensation for Joseph Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union Siberian Detention” to the Kyoto Local Court and the Head of the National Defense on December 26, 2007, seeking redress from Committee of the USSR, on August 23, 1945 the Japanese government. We are asking for issued the top secret order “Regarding the ¥30,000,0001 for each plaintiff as compensation Arrest of Half a Million Japanese Soldiers: How (and accepting ¥10,000,0002 compensation as and Where to Detain Them, and How to Utilize partial settlement).
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese History ୯ᅢṏྍᏟษ
    VOLUME 5 | ISSUE 2 | JULY 2021 | ISSN 2059-1632 . https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms journal of CHINESE HISTORY , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at ₼⦚㸆⚁⸇⒙ 01 Oct 2021 at 17:13:18 , on 170.106.202.58 . IP address: https://www.cambridge.org/core https://doi.org/10.1017/jch.2021.13 Downloaded from JOURNAL OF CHINESE HISTORY ୯ᅢṎྍᏟษ . EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Patricia Ebrey, University of Washington, USA ASSOCIATE EDITORS Pre-Tang, Ming Qing, Robin McNeal, Kenneth Hammond, Cornell, USA New Mexico State University, USA Tang-Song-Yuan, Twentieth Century, https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Beverly Bossler, Zhao Ma, University of California, USA Washington University, St. Louis, USA EDITORIAL BOARD Pre-Tang Johan Elverskog, Southern Methodist Reinhard Emmerich, University of Münster, University, USA Germany David Faure, Chinese University of Li Feng, Columbia University, USA Hong Kong, China Erica Fox Brindley, Pennsylvania State Chin-sheng Huang, Academia Sinica, Taiwan University Dorothy Ko, Barnard College, USA Charles Holcombe, University of Northern Kenneth Pomeranz, University of Chicago, Iowa, USA USA Mu-chou Poo, University of Hong Kong, David Robinson, Colgate College, USA Hong Kong Dagmar Schäfer, Max Planck Institute for the Roel Sterckx, University of Cambridge, UK History of Science, Germany , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at Robin Yates, McGill University, Canada Sarah Schneewind, University of California, Jender Lee, Academia Sinica, Taiwan San Diego, USA Matthew Sommer, Stanford University,
    [Show full text]
  • The Atomic Bombs and the Soviet Invasion: What Drove Japan's Decision to Surrender?
    Volume 5 | Issue 8 | Article ID 2501 | Aug 01, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Atomic Bombs and the Soviet Invasion: What Drove Japan's Decision to Surrender? Tsuyoshi Hasegawa The Atomic Bombs and the SovietFrank, have recently confronted this issue Invasion: What Drove Japan’s Decision to head-on, arguing that the atomic bombing of Surrender? Hiroshima had a more decisive effect on Japan’s decision to surrender than did Soviet Tsuyoshi HASEGAWA entry into the war.[4] This essay challenges that view. It argues that (1) the atomic Almost immediately following the end of World bombing of Nagasaki did not have much effect War II, Americans began to question the use of on Japan’s decision; (2) of the two factors—the the atomic bomb and the circumstances atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Soviet entry surrounding the end of the Pacific War. More into the war—the Soviet invasion had a more than half a century later, books and articles on important effect on Japan’s decision to the atomic bomb still provoke storms of debate surrender; (3) nevertheless, neither the atomic among readers and the use of atomic weapons bombs nor Soviet entry into the war served as remains a sharply contested subject.[1] As the “a knock-out punch” that had a direct, decisive, 1995 controversy over the Enola Gay exhibit at and immediate effect on Japan’s decision to the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space surrender; (4) the most important, immediate Museum revealed, the issues connected with cause behind Japan’s decision to surrender the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and were the emperor’s “sacred decision” to do so, Nagasaki continue to touch a sensitive nerve in engineered by a small group of the Japanese Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Wai Kit Wicky Tse University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Tse, Wai Kit Wicky, "Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 589. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Abstract As a frontier region of the Qin-Han (221BCE-220CE) empire, the northwest was a new territory to the Chinese realm. Until the Later Han (25-220CE) times, some portions of the northwestern region had only been part of imperial soil for one hundred years. Its coalescence into the Chinese empire was a product of long-term expansion and conquest, which arguably defined the egionr 's military nature. Furthermore, in the harsh natural environment of the region, only tough people could survive, and unsurprisingly, the region fostered vigorous warriors. Mixed culture and multi-ethnicity featured prominently in this highly militarized frontier society, which contrasted sharply with the imperial center that promoted unified cultural values and stood in the way of a greater degree of transregional integration. As this project shows, it was the northwesterners who went through a process of political peripheralization during the Later Han times played a harbinger role of the disintegration of the empire and eventually led to the breakdown of the early imperial system in Chinese history.
    [Show full text]