NEW SPECIMEN of GIGANOTOSAURUS CAROL/Nil (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995), SUPPORTS IT AS the LARGEST THEROPOD EVER FOUND

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEW SPECIMEN of GIGANOTOSAURUS CAROL/Nil (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995), SUPPORTS IT AS the LARGEST THEROPOD EVER FOUND GAIA N' 15, LlSBOAlLISBON, DEZEMBRO/DECEMBER 1998, pp. 117-122 (ISSN: 0871 -5424) NEW SPECIMEN OF GIGANOTOSAURUS CAROL/Nil (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995), SUPPORTS IT AS THE LARGEST THEROPOD EVER FOUND Jorge Orlando CALVO Museo de Geologia y Paleontologia de la Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Buenos Aires 1400, (8300) NEU QUEN . ARGE NTI NA. Rodolfo CORIA Di recci6n General de Cultura - MuseD Carmen Funes. (8318) Plaza Huincul, NEUQUEN. ARGENTINA. ABSTRACT: Giganotosaurus carotinii CORIA & SALGADO, 1995 (MUCPv- Ch1) is considered the largesttheropod in the world, Here we describe a new specimen of G. carotinii. In spite ofthe fact that the material is fragmentary Uust a partial dentary), it is very important for its size. Comparisons between this new material with that of the holotype shows that this is the larg­ est theropod specimen ever found. The new specimen of G. Carotinii is 8% bigger than the holotype. RESUMEN : Giganotosaurus carotiniiCoRIA & SALGADO, 1995 (MUCPv- Ch1) es considerado el teropodo mas grande del mundo. Aqui nosotros describimos un nuevo especimen de G. ca­ rotinii. A pesar de que el material es fragmentario (solo una parte del dentario), este es muy importante por su tamai'io. Comparaciones realizadas entre este nuevo material y el que corresponde al holotipo, muestra que este es el especimen de teropodo mas grande en con­ trado hasta ahora. EI nuevo especimen de G. carotiniies un 8% mas grande que el holotipo. INTRODUCTION last few years, the discussion about what was the biggest theropod came back with the discovery of Theropod dinosaurs have been focus of many two amazing specimens in both Africa (SERE NO et kind of studies includ ing an atomi cal (MOLNAR, a /., 1996) and South America (CORIA & SALGADO, 1991), phylogenetic (GAUTHIER , 1986; HOLTZ , 1995). The South American form was proposed to 1994), behavioral and physiolog ical analyses (MOL­ be a new species Giganotosaurus carolinii CORIA & NAR & FARLOW, 1990). Perhaps, one of the most in­ SALGADO, 1995 which was claimed as th e biggest teresting aspects of th ese vertebrates is that they meat-eater dinosaur ever known, with a recently invol ve the biggest land-living predators in Meso­ proposed skull length of 180 cm (CORIA & SALGADO, zoic Earth history. In this regard, the first theropod 1996). That specimen is an almost complete skele­ known for modern science was Mega/osaurus ton found near EI Chocon town, at levels of Rio Li­ BUCKLAND , 1824, form erly recorded upon a frag­ may Formation, Candeleros Member (Albian­ ment of lower jaw and named because of its aston­ Cenomanian). ishing size. Half a century latter, the finding of Tyrannosaurus rex OSBORN, 1905, became th e first On a fieldtrip made in 1987 to the Cerro Los Can­ well known theropod, which al so was the largest car­ deleros locality, 35 km Southwest Plaza Huincul, on nivorous dinosaur in the world over almost 90 years. Neuquen Province (Fig. 1) was found an isolated More recently, new studies and findings all around dentary (MUCPv-95) of a big theropod which was the world have increased our knowledge of giant briefly described by CALVO (1989). The dentary is theropods with the description of different forms identical to that described by CORI A & SALG ADO such as Acrocanthosaurus STOVALL & LANGSTON, (1995) as part of the holotype of Giganotosaurus 1950; Deinocheirus OSM6LSKA& RONIEWICZ, 1970; carolinii (MUCPv-CH-1). Saurophagus RAY, 1941 , and Carcharodontosau­ In the present paper we describe in detail the rusSTRoMER, 1934 (SERENO et a/. , 1996). But in the dentary of the specimens MUCPv-Ch1 (holotype) 117 artigos/papers J. CAL va & R. CORIA 68'00 NEUQUEN PROVINCE , A ~ , ~ , /,/'/ " ~ ~~~~~~~~::~ / RIO NEGRO PROVINCE j 9'30 o 10 20 Km. 3 - - I Fig. 1 - Map of Argentina (1) and the Neuquen Province (2) detailing the area where the new specimen of Giganoto­ saurus carolin;; (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995), MUCPv-95, was collected (3). The arrow shows the place where MUCPv-95 was found. The X, 12 km SW to EI Choc6n locality, shows the place where G. carolin;; (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995) (holo­ type) was found. and MUCPv-95which represents a new specimen of Horizon and Locality: The site of this specimen the species Giganotosaurus carolinii but bigger than is located 35 km Southwest of Plaza Huincul, at the the holotype, and we compare with othergiantthero­ Cerro Los Candeleros locality. The rocks are char­ pods in order to establish size-relationships. acterized by being red sandstones of the Candele­ ros Member, Rio Limay Formation (Albian­ SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY Cenomanian) (Fig. 2). Order Saurischia Diagnosis: Anterior end of the dentary dorsov­ entrally expanded with flallened symphysial sur­ Suborder Theropoda MARSH, 1881 face, bearing a ventral process. Infraorder Tetanurae GAUTHIER, 1986 Family Carcharodontosauridae Description: The preserved portion of the den­ SERENO et a/., 1996 tary is 61 cm in length and lacks its posteriormost ex­ treme. There are 15 alveoli preserved, but it is possible that at least one or two more were present Genus Giganotosaurus (Fig. 3). All teeth are broken except those unworn. In CORIA & SALGADO, 1995 lateral view, the symphysis is the highest part of the dentary being 18 cm high (Fig. 46, 56, 66). The Giganotosaurus carolinii shortest part is at the level of the 8th alveolus, where CORIA & SALGADO, 1995 is 14 cm high. The ventral border is concave. The lat­ Fig. 3-6 eral side is slightly convex dorsoventrally with a lon­ gitudinal groove that supports the nutritious Material: MUCPv-95 (Museo de la Universidad foramina (Fig. 46). This groove is coincident in place Nacional del Comahue). A leftdentarywith some un­ with another one from the medial side. Anteriorly, the worn teeth. bone surface is rugose, bearing many foramina 118 NEW SPECIMEN OF GIGANOTOSAURUS CAROLINIl The medial side, well preserved, shows fused in­ ... .~ =..- terdental plates (Fig. 4A; 5A). Below them, a similar e= .. EO ....,if" groove to that described from the lateral side, marks ~ El 0 ::E ... the inferior limit of the interdental plate row, where every tooth has one nutritional foramen. The man­ dibular symphysis is not well preserved in MUCPv- B .. u'" .IlI 95, but it is in the holotype. There, a fiat articular sur­ 0 os face can be observed, showing a rather subrectan­ 'C .. os -< j gular shape. The Meckelian channel is parallel to the 0 -- "0- .. ventral border (Fig. 4B, 5B). In its anterior portion it U ";;os curves abruptly to the anteroventral border, where 'Ce-o .. an anteroventral concavity is developed (Fig. 6A). ~ ·;s-u This depression is present in MUCPv95 but not in == MUCPv-Ch1. In dorsal view the dentary shows a .. wide curvature to the internal plane. This begins be­ ..... - tween the 9th and the 1a th alveolus and in regular cr= -=g:;0 ...= shape reaches the symphysis region. This charac­ ;z; --0 ter, together with the reduced simphysis, suggest -5 •51 .. that both mandibles would build a wide mouth. Atthe =cr ~ ~= th ..... t: current preparation stage, from the 15 alveolus, ;z; .....0 only three have functional teeth (4, 8 and 9), one is in 0 advanced eruption (7) and four are on an early stage "0 of eruption (1,5,10 and 12). Mostofthe alveoli seem -..os to be of similar shape and size. Except for the first ....,.~ one, which is the smallest one (2.5 cm anteroposte­ -- riorly), the other ones are aproximatelly 3.5 cm long. -;; This feature indicates as very likely no major differ­ .... <.> os .9.. ences among dental size and shape all along the ~ ::c I/) lower jaws. The laterally compressed functional -- GI teeth are oval in cross-section being constricted in ~ the middle, which allows distinguishing of both ~ 0 crown and root. They have the typical theropod fea­ tures with serrated anterior and posterior borders. "0-:: .. The erupted teeth are exposed only on their tips, but U they are similar in shape to the functional ones pre­ served in the holotype. Giganotosaurus carolinii CORIA & SALGADO, AS Fig. 2 - Scheme of the Neuquen Group sequence to THE LARGEST THEROPOD EVER FOUND show the stratigraphic position of the Specimen (MUCPv- 95). The comparisons of the specimen MUCPv-95 are restricted because of its limited condition; how­ placed along three main lines, upper, middle and ever there are no doubts about the fact that it corre­ lower lines. Both upper and lower ones are continu­ sponds to the species Giganotosaurus carolinii. The ous along the whole dentary. The same condition is morphology of the whole bone overlaps with no dif­ observed in the holotype specimen. ferences with that known from the holotype MUCPv­ Ch-1 . The presence of a squared anterior end, with a Fig. 3 - Giganotosaurus caro/inii (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995) (MUCPv-95) dentary in dorsal views. 119 J. CAL va & R. CORIA lOcm -"::'~>r: : .' '.' .. .. ." ' . .. .. B Fig. 5 - Giganotosaurus carolinii (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995) (MUCPv-95) dentary. A - Medial view. B - Lateral view. Scale bar 10 em. 120 NEW SPECIMEN OF GIGANOTOSAURUS CAROLINIl B Fig. 6 - Giganotosaurus carolinii (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995) (MUCPv-95) anterior portion of the dentary. A - Medial view. B - Lateral view. Scale bar 10 em. o 100 em ~--------~------I ~~~ C1 C2 Fig. 7 - Skull·s comparisons among the biggest known theropods. A - Tyrannosaurus rex OSBORN 1905. B - Carcha­ rodontosaurus saharicus (SERENO et al., 1996). C - Giganotosaurus caro/inii (CORIA & SALGADO, 1995); C, - holotype, MUCPv-Ch1; C, - MUCPv-95. Dentary preserved marked in black. 121 J. CAL va & R. CORIA flat symphysial surface, and an anteroventral pro­ MOLNAR, R.E. & FARLOW, J.O. (1990) - Carnosaur paleobiology, in WEISHAMPEL, D.B.; DODSON, P. & OSMOLSKA, H. (Eds.), cess, mentioned by CALVO, 1989 for MUCPv-95, are The Dinosauria, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, pp. 210- shared by both specimens, and this is a combination 224.
Recommended publications
  • Tyrannosaurus Rex by Guy Belleranti
    Name: ______________________________ Tyrannosaurus Rex By Guy Belleranti One of the most dangerous dinosaurs was the Tyrannosaurus rex. It looked like a huge lizard with sharp teeth. It lived over 60 million years ago. From nose to tail, T-rex was as long as a school bus. It was taller than a house. It weighed more than an airplane. T-rex’s head was as long as a kitchen table. T-rex was the biggest meat-eating dinosaur. It could eat hundreds of pounds of meat in one bite. Animals that eat meat have sharp teeth. T-rex had 60 of them! Some of the teeth were as big as bananas. When T-rex lost a tooth, it grew a new one. T-rex stood on two powerful legs. It also had two small arms. Its strong tail helped keep it from falling over. It might be fun to see a live Tyrannosaurus rex, but I wouldn’t want to meet one. Would you? Super Teacher Worksheets - www.superteacherworksheets.com Name: ______________________________ Tyrannosaurus Rex By Guy Belleranti 1. How many teeth did a Tyrannosaurus rex have? a. thirty b. sixteen c. sixty d. seventy 2. How long ago did Tyrannosaurus rex live? ________________________________________________________________ 3. What did Tyrannosaurus rex eat? a. leaves from tall trees b. other dinosaurs c. small insects d. people 4. A T-rex was as long as a ______________________________________. 5. A T-rex weighed as much as an _______________________________. 6. Which dinosaurs had sharp teeth? a. all dinosaurs b. dinosaurs that had tails c. dinosaurs that were big d.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurassic Park" Have Come to Pass
    JURASSIC WORLD and INDOMINUS REX 0. JURASSIC WORLD and INDOMINUS REX - Story Preface 1. EARLY DINOSAUR DISCOVERIES 2. THE JURASSIC PERIOD 3. JURASSIC-ERA DINOSAURS 4. FOSSILIZED AMBER 5. THE SOLNHOFEN LIMESTONE 6. TYRANNOSAURUS REX 7. T-REX - SUE 8. PTERANODON 9. TRICERATOPS 10. VELOCIRAPTOR 11. SPINOSAURUS 12. DINOSAUR TRACKS AND DISPUTES 13. NEW DINOSAUR DISCOVERIES 14. JURASSIC WORLD and INDOMINUS REX What do you do when you want to boost visitor attendance to your dinosaur-dominated, Jurassic World theme park? Use DNA, from four different dinosaurs, and “in the Hammond lab” create something entirely new and fearsome. Then ... give the new creature a name which signifies its awesome power: Indominus rex. At least ... that’s how the story theme works in the 2015 film “Jurassic World.” So ... let’s travel back in time, to the age of the dinosaurs, and meet the four interesting creatures whose DNA led to this new and ferocious predator: Rugops; Carnotaurus; Giganotosaurus; Majungasaurus. If—contrary to plan—Indominus rex becomes a killing machine, we have to ask: Did she “inherit” that trait from her “ancestors?” Let’s examine the question, starting with Rugops (ROO-gops). What we know about this theropod, from a physical standpoint, comes from a single, nearly complete and fossilized skull. With its weak but gaping jaw and skull, Rugops—which means “wrinkle face”—is not a predator like the Cretaceous-Period Spinosaurus. Instead, Rugops is a natural-born scavenger, likely waiting in the wings for what’s left of a Spinosaurus-caught, Cretaceous-era fish known as Onchopristis. Living off the scraps of meals, killed by another creature, could be enough for a Rugops.
    [Show full text]
  • Sereno 20060098.Vp
    Basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the Lower Cretaceous Elrhaz Formation of Niger PAUL C. SERENO and STEPHEN L. BRUSATTE Sereno, P.C. and Brusatte, S.L. 2008. Basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the Lower Cretaceous Elrhaz Formation of Niger. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53 (1): 15–46. We report the discovery of basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the mid Cretaceous (Aptian– Albian, ca. 112 Ma) Elrhaz Formation of the Niger Republic. The abelisaurid, Kryptops palaios gen. et sp. nov., is repre− sented by a single individual preserving the maxilla, pelvic girdle, vertebrae and ribs. Several features, including a maxilla textured externally by impressed vascular grooves and a narrow antorbital fossa, clearly place Kryptops palaios within Abelisauridae as its oldest known member. The carcharodontosaurid, Eocarcharia dinops gen. et sp. nov., is repre− sented by several cranial bones and isolated teeth. Phylogenetic analysis places it as a basal carcharodontosaurid, similar to Acrocanthosaurus and less derived than Carcharodontosaurus and Giganotosaurus. The discovery of these taxa sug− gests that large body size and many of the derived cranial features of abelisaurids and carcharodontosaurids had already evolved by the mid Cretaceous. The presence of a close relative of the North American genus Acrocanthosaurus on Af− rica suggests that carcharodontosaurids had already achieved a trans−Tethyan distribution by the mid Cretaceous. Key words: Theropod, abelisaurid, allosauroid, carcharodontosaurid, Kryptops, Eocarcharia, Cretaceous, Africa. Paul C. Sereno [[email protected]], Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, 1027 E. 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA; Stephen L. Brusatte [[email protected]], Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Fused and Vaulted Nasals of Tyrannosaurid Dinosaurs: Implications for Cranial Strength and Feeding Mechanics
    Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: Implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics ERIC SNIVELY, DONALD M. HENDERSON, and DOUG S. PHILLIPS Snively, E., Henderson, D.M., and Phillips, D.S. 2006. Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: Implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51 (3): 435–454. Tyrannosaurid theropods display several unusual adaptations of the skulls and teeth. Their nasals are fused and vaulted, suggesting that these elements braced the cranium against high feeding forces. Exceptionally high strengths of maxillary teeth in Tyrannosaurus rex indicate that it could exert relatively greater feeding forces than other tyrannosaurids. Areas and second moments of area of the nasals, calculated from CT cross−sections, show higher nasal strengths for large tyrannosaurids than for Allosaurus fragilis. Cross−sectional geometry of theropod crania reveals high second moments of area in tyrannosaurids, with resulting high strengths in bending and torsion, when compared with the crania of similarly sized theropods. In tyrannosaurids trends of strength increase are positively allomeric and have similar allometric expo− nents, indicating correlated progression towards unusually high strengths of the feeding apparatus. Fused, arched nasals and broad crania of tyrannosaurids are consistent with deep bites that impacted bone and powerful lateral movements of the head for dismembering prey. Key words: Theropoda, Carnosauria, Tyrannosauridae, biomechanics, feeding mechanics, computer modeling, com− puted tomography. Eric Snively [[email protected]], Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada; Donald M. Henderson [[email protected]], Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Box 7500, Drumheller, Alberta T0J 0Y0, Canada; Doug S.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Smartest-Dinosaur.Pdf
    BY “DINO” DON LESSEM ILLUSTRATIONS BY JOHN BINDON a LERNER PUBLICATIONS COMPANY / MINNEAPOLIS To Emily Lessem, my favorite niece Text copyright © 2005 by Dino Don, Inc. Illustrations copyright © 2005 by John Bindon Photographs courtesy of: Dino Don, Inc., p. 12; Dr. Philip Currie, Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Drumheller, Alberta, Canada, p. 13; Photographed by Robert Fillion. Reproduced with permission of the Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Canada, p. 30; Animals, Animals © OSF/BARTLETT, D&J, p. 31. All rights reserved. International copyright secured. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the prior written permission of Lerner Publications Company, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in an acknowledged review. This book is available in two editions: Library binding by Lerner Publications Company, a division of Lerner Publishing Group Soft cover by First Avenue Editions, an imprint of Lerner Publishing Group 241 First Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55401 U.S.A. Website address: www.lernerbooks.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication-Data Lessem, Don. The smartest dinosaurs / by Don Lessem ; illustrations by John Bindon. p. cm. — (Meet the dinosaurs) Includes index. eISBN: 0–8225–3285–9 1. Dinosaurs—Juvenile literature. I. Bindon, John, ill. II. Title. III. Series: Lessem, Don. Meet the dinosaurs. QE861.5.L477 2005 567.9—dc22 2004011152 Manufactured in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 – DP – 10 09 08 07 06 05 MEET THE SMARTEST DINOSAURS . 4 HOW SMART WERE DINOSAURS? .
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in Later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2020-0174.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 04-Jan-2021 Author: Complete List of Authors: Holtz, Thomas; University of Maryland at College Park, Department of Geology; NationalDraft Museum of Natural History, Department of Geology Keyword: Dinosaur, Ontogeny, Theropod, Paleocology, Mesozoic, Tyrannosauridae Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Tribute to Dale Russell Issue? : © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: 2 Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous 3 Asiamerica 4 5 6 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 7 8 Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA 9 Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 USA 10 Email address: [email protected] 11 ORCID: 0000-0002-2906-4900 Draft 12 13 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 14 Department of Geology 15 8000 Regents Drive 16 University of Maryland 17 College Park, MD 20742 18 USA 19 Phone: 1-301-405-4084 20 Fax: 1-301-314-9661 21 Email address: [email protected] 22 23 1 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 91 24 ABSTRACT 25 Well-sampled dinosaur communities from the Jurassic through the early Late Cretaceous show 26 greater taxonomic diversity among larger (>50kg) theropod taxa than communities of the 27 Campano-Maastrichtian, particularly to those of eastern/central Asia and Laramidia.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyrannosaurus Rex.Pmd
    North Dakota Stratigraphy Tyrannosaurus rex ROCK ROCK UNIT COLUMN PERIOD EPOCH AGES MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO Common Name: Holocene Oahe .01 Tyrant reptile king Coleharbor Pleistocene QUATERNARY Classification: 1.8 Pliocene Unnamed 5 Miocene Class: Reptilia 25 Arikaree Order: Saurischia Family: Tyrannosauridae Brule Oligocene 38 Tyrannosaurus rex shed tooth. Tooth collected in Morton South Heart Chadron Chalky Buttes County. Height of tooth is 64 mm. North Dakota State Fossil Camels Butte Eocene Golden Collection. 55 Valley Bear Den Description: Sentinel Butte Tyrannosaurus rex was one of the largest carnivorous (meat TERTIARY eating) dinosaurs and was one of the largest terrestrial carnivores yet known. The adults grew to lengths of 40 feet from the end of the tail to tip of the nose and weighed about 8 tons. When they Bullion Paleocene Creek stood on their hind legs they were up to about 20 feet tall. They had huge heads, about 5 feet long, and possessed large, Slope approximately 50, dagger-like teeth, some as large as bananas. Cannonball The teeth, which were serrated, could puncture bone and carve Ludlow through flesh of prey. Its back legs were long, heavily built, and 65 powerful with 3 clawed toes on each foot. Each foot was broad Hell Creek with three forward-pointing toes. Each toe ended in a sharply- curved talon. T. rex’s arms were very short and contained hands Fox Hills with only two, clawed fingers on each hand. Its tail was long, heavy, and held off the ground to act as a counterbalance. They ACEOUS could tear off as much as about 500 pounds of flesh at one time Pierre with their powerful jaws.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nonavian Theropod Quadrate II: Systematic Usefulness, Major Trends and Cladistic and Phylogenetic Morphometrics Analyses
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272162807 The nonavian theropod quadrate II: systematic usefulness, major trends and cladistic and phylogenetic morphometrics analyses Article · January 2014 DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.380v2 CITATION READS 1 90 3 authors: Christophe Hendrickx Ricardo Araujo University of the Witwatersrand Technical University of Lisbon 37 PUBLICATIONS 210 CITATIONS 89 PUBLICATIONS 324 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Octávio Mateus University NOVA of Lisbon 224 PUBLICATIONS 2,205 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Nature and Time on Earth - Project for a course and a book for virtual visits to past environments in learning programmes for university students (coordinators Edoardo Martinetto, Emanuel Tschopp, Robert A. Gastaldo) View project Ten Sleep Wyoming Jurassic dinosaurs View project All content following this page was uploaded by Octávio Mateus on 12 February 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The nonavian theropod quadrate II: systematic usefulness, major trends and cladistic and phylogenetic morphometrics analyses Christophe Hendrickx1,2 1Universidade Nova de Lisboa, CICEGe, Departamento de Ciências da Terra, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Quinta da Torre, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal. 2 Museu da Lourinhã, 9 Rua João Luis de Moura, 2530-158, Lourinhã, Portugal. s t [email protected] n i r P e 2,3,4,5 r Ricardo Araújo P 2 Museu da Lourinhã, 9 Rua João Luis de Moura, 2530-158, Lourinhã, Portugal. 3 Huffington Department of Earth Sciences, Southern Methodist University, PO Box 750395, 75275-0395, Dallas, Texas, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Colossal New Predatory Dino Terrorized Early Tyrannosaurs 22 November 2013
    Colossal new predatory dino terrorized early tyrannosaurs 22 November 2013 dinosaurs ever discovered. The only other carcharodontosaur known from North America is Acrocanthosaurus, which roamed eastern North America more than 10 million years earlier. Siats is only the second carcharodontosaur ever discovered in North America; Acrocanthosaurus, discovered in 1950, was the first. "It's been 63 years since a predator of this size has been named from North America," says Lindsay Zanno, a North Carolina State University paleontologist with a joint appointment at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, and lead author of a Nature Communications paper describing the find. "You can't imagine how thrilled we were to see the bones of this behemoth poking out of the hillside." Zanno and colleague Peter Makovicky, from Chicago's Field Museum of Natural History, discovered the partial skeleton of the new predator in Utah's Cedar Mountain Formation in 2008. The species name acknowledges the Meeker family for its support of early career paleontologists at the Field Museum, including Zanno. This is an illustration of Siats meekerorum. Credit: Jorge Gonzales A new species of carnivorous dinosaur – one of the three largest ever discovered in North America – lived alongside and competed with small-bodied tyrannosaurs 98 million years ago. This newly discovered species, Siats meekerorum, (pronounced see-atch) was the apex predator of its time, and kept tyrannosaurs from assuming top predator roles for millions of years. Named after a cannibalistic man-eating monster from Ute tribal legend, Siats is a species of carcharodontosaur, a group of giant meat-eaters This illustration shows Siats within its ecosystem, eating that includes some of the largest predatory an Eolambia and intimidating early, small-bodied tyrannosauroids.
    [Show full text]
  • Sistema Institucional De Educación a Distancia De La Universidad Nacional De Río Negro (SIED UNRN)
    Dr. Ignacio Díaz Martínez (UNRN-CONICET) Docente-investigador de la Universidad Nacional de Río Negro [email protected] Sistema Institucional de Educación a Distancia de la Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (SIED UNRN) Curso virtual: Dinosaurios de la Patagonia1 MÓDULO 1: Historia de las investigaciones de dinosaurios en Argentina2 1 Curso Mooc “Dinosaurios de la Patagonia”, alojado en la plataforma mundial EdX, a través de la Universidad Universidad Nacional Nacional de Córdoba (https://www.edx.org). de Río Negro 2 Revisores de contenido: Dr. Rodolfo Coria, Dr. Leonardo Salgado, Dra. Marianella Talevi y Mg. Mattia Baiano MÓDULO 1: historia de las investigaciones de dinosaurios en Argentina. DINOSAURIOS DE LA PATAGONIA Objetivo del Módulo 1.1- EL PRIMER DINOSAURIO DE AMÉRICA DEL SUR 2 1: introducir al Y LA INFLUENCIA DE FLORENTINO AMEGHINO EN participante del curso LA PALEONTOLOGÍA ARGENTINA. a la historia de los EdX PATAGONIA DE LA DINOSAURIOS Actualmente, es habitual leer en los diarios sobre hallazgos de descubrimientos de nuevos dinosaurios en Argentina, y sobre todo en la Patagonia. fósiles de dinosaurios Allí se muestran fotografías de los investigadores tanto en el en Argentina haciendo campo como en los repositorios de los museos junto a los huesos hincapié en los que encontraron. También se suele mostrar al lector detalles lugares donde se propias de la excavación y de la posterior investigación: quiénes lo estudiaron, de qué universidades, qué características realizaron y las notables tienen los huesos, etc. No obstante, la historia de los personas que lo primeros.descubrimientos.fue.bastante diferente. hicieron posible. Todo empieza a finales del Siglo XIX durante la denominada “Campaña del Desierto”.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology 6:68-72 68 ISSN 2292-1389 Rebuttal of McFeeters, Ryan and Cullen, 2018, ‘Positional variation in pedal unguals of North American ornithomimids (Dinosauria, Theropoda): A Response to Brownstein (2017)’ Chase Doran Brownstein Stamford Museum, 39 Scofieldtown Road, Stamford, CT 06903, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The Arundel Clay of Maryland is among the only Early Cretaceous terrestrial units known from eastern North America. Research on some theropod dinosaur bones from this layer has indicated the presence of two ornithomimosaur taxa in the assemblage. However, a recent paper discussed issues with the definite assignment of any of these unguals to Ornithomimosauria and suggested that morphological differences originally interpreted to be indicative of the presence of two ornithomimosaurs could be explained by positional variation. Here, I show that substantial evidence persists for the presence of two ornithomimosaurs in the Arundel Clay assemblage, even considering the recent description of positional variation in ornithomimosaur pedal unguals. Furthermore, the argument against the confident assignment of these unguals to ornithomimosaurs is shown to be based on oversimplified comparisons that do not take into account the combination of features in the Arundel specimens that allow for their assignment to that clade. Although several small points made in the initial paper describing the Arundel specimens are incorrect or unsubstantiated, the differences between the Maryland unguals are outside the spectrum of positional variation and are indicative of the presence of two ornithomimosaurs in the Arundel Clay assemblage. The Arundel Clay of Maryland is an Aptian unit (e.g., Lipka major acts in that paper: (1) the confident assignment of the et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Subjects
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47594-5 — Dinosaurs 4th Edition Index More Information INDEX OF SUBJECTS – – – A Zuul, 275 276 Barrett, Paul, 98, 335 336, 406, 446 447 Ankylosauridae Barrick, R, 383–384 acetabulum, 71, 487 characteristics of, 271–273 basal dinosauromorph, 101 acromial process, 271, 273, 487 cladogram of, 281 basal Iguanodontia, 337 actual diversity, 398 defined, 488 basal Ornithopoda, 336 adenosine diphosphate, see ADP evolution of, 279 Bates, K. T., 236, 360 adenosine triphosphate, see ATP ankylosaurids, 275–276 beak, 489 ADP (adenosine diphosphate), 390, 487 anpsids, 76 belief systems, 474, 489 advanced characters, 55, 487 antediluvian period, 422, 488 Bell, P. R., 162 aerobic metabolism, 391, 487 anterior position, 488 bennettitaleans, 403, 489 – age determination (dinosaur), 354 357 antorbital fenestra, 80, 488 benthic organisms, 464, 489 Age of Dinosaurs, 204, 404–405 Arbour, Victoria, 277 Benton, M. J., 2, 104, 144, 395, 402–403, akinetic movement, see kinetic movement Archibald, J. D., 467, 469 444–445, 477–478 Alexander, R. M., 361 Archosauria, 80, 88–90, 203, 488 Berman, D. S, 236–237 allometry, 351, 487 Archosauromorpha, 79–81, 488 Beurien, Karl, 435 altricial offspring, 230, 487 archosauromorphs, 401 bidirectional respiration, 350 Alvarez, Luis, 455 archosaurs, 203, 401 Big Al, 142 – Alvarez, Walter, 442, 454 455, 481 artifacts, 395 biogeography, 313, 489 Alvarezsauridae, 487 Asaro, Frank, 455 biomass, 415, 489 – alvarezsaurs, 168 169 ascending process of the astragalus, 488 biosphere, 2 alveolus/alveoli,
    [Show full text]