DOCSLIB.ORG

HERE IS the EVIDENCE, NOW SHOW US the BALLOTS! ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™ the EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED for RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle Plantm Points: 100)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HERE IS the EVIDENCE, NOW SHOW US the BALLOTS! ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™ the EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED for RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle Plantm Points: 100) APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION HERE IS THE EVIDENCE, NOW SHOW US THE BALLOTS! ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™ THE EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100) URGENT ACTION REQUIRED Here is the Evidence, Now Show Us the Ballots! We are in the midst of what some call “the greatest political scandal in history.” According to recent polls, something like 47% of Americans believe that the 2020 election was stolen, a plurality larger than those who believe it was free and fair. And regardless of which camp you find yourself in, everyone has to face the fact that this was an extremely unusual election in many respects. We saw massive electoral changes and challenges put in place during the Covid-19 pandemic. And we just exited a period in which one side repeatedly challenged the legitimacy of President Trump, first with claims of Russian collusion and then impeachment, and constant media attacks. The fact is a significant portion of the American population would not view either Trump or Biden as the next legitimate President unless and until we clear up the controversy over the 2020 election. This is absolutely necessary for the proper healing of our nation. It will require courage from all parties. Your Mission: To lead in a fair and impartial way, and to resolve all of this without further turmoil through a special analysis on the physical ballots in the six key swing states. “We will offer a simple and elegant way to examine the 2020 election and hopefully, once and for all, find an agreed upon winner.” –Kevin Freeman page 2 THE EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100) SP.1230 (OSINT) Open-Sourced Intelligence Special Report. This is a Special Election Integrity Report with Kevin Freeman. 1. Nearly half of America believes the election was stolen and that is a problem! • There should be little wonder as to why nearly half of America believes the election was stolen. • Even if you believe that the election was mostly fair, you have to admit that there were many unusual and suspicious things about this election. • Denying that will only tear us further apart as a society. “Thoughtfully looking at the irregularities and abnormalities can be a way to better understand one another and heal our nation. This is something that every fair- minded American should want.” 2. This is not a Trump vs. Biden issue. It’s not about Democrats vs. Republicans. This is about election integrity and the future of our nation. • Joe Biden should want a clear process and so should Donald Trump. • But to date, this has not been handled in a bi-partisan, transparent way. And that has created confusion and division. • In this briefing, we will walk through the big issues, show evidence that has never been debunked or refuted, and then offer a simple and elegant solution that should erase the doubts and settle the matter for fair-minded individuals. “There is good news is that you can play an important role in healing and restoring America.” 3. The Disputes and large anomalies are primarily from just six counties out of 3006 counties in all of America. NOTE: The 2020 Presidential election was decided by six counties out of more than 3,000 counties in America. These critical counties include the swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada. page 3 THE EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100) • And the voting and counting were not clear and transparent in those six counties, with multiple credible reports of irregularities and some of it being outright fraud. Yet, the media, social media, and governments have gone out of their way to censor, suppress, or deny any issues. This has not engendered confidence. It has stoked division rather than healing it. A look at the key issues: A. Procedural Changes - There were all sorts of procedural changes to this election that have never been done before. These changes stripped out many of the safeguards that every expert on both sides said were necessary prior to this election. As an example, even Chris Matthews, Barack Obama and Debbie Wasserman Schultz warned about the risks of mail- in ballots unless there were safeguards like true signature verification. You can see for yourself here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ca0fT5OvE1XW/. The bi-partisan National Election Defense Coalition was formed in 2013 based on the work of former president Jimmy Carter and James Baker. Here’s what they said about mass mail-in ballots before the election: • “As with any voting system that is not fully transparent, proving mail-in fraud can be difficult or impossible. Once we drop our ballot in the mail, we can’t verify what becomes of it. Additionally, should our ballots arrive in the central aggregating location untampered, they are likely to be counted by the same computerized counters that have been proven vulnerable to error and fraud. Central counting makes fraud on a large scale easier to accomplish and harder to detect. page 4 THE EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100) • Vote by mail cannot provide a secure chain of custody of the ballots. That means the ballots are moved without consistent public oversight, offering opportunities for fraud, mismanagement and disenfranchisement. Ballots are stored in hundreds of thousands of locations with insufficient security for two to three weeks. The ballots are handled by many anonymous persons throughout the process. It’s possible that an unmarked contest on a ballot can be marked by someone other than the voter when the ballots are opened for counting.” • Let that sink in. As this program is being prepared those remarks remain on the ElectionDefense.org website and everyone knows them to be true. • No wonder that, according to the Stanford University Daily earlier this year (https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/04/24/the-case-against-a-vote-by- mail-election): page 5 THE EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100) B. Ignoring the bi-partisan reality - Election officials are conveniently ignoring that bi-partisan reality, trying to convince you that this was ”the most secure election in history.” • But did you know that, according to the New York Times, mail in voting accounted for nearly half of all votes across the country in this election? (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/10/us/mail-voting-absentee.html) • This is a massive increase in mail-in ballots, never before witnessed in America. Take a look at this chart using data from the US Election Assistance Commission. • Mail-in ballots voted jumped by nearly 40 million from the last election. • The important thing to note here is that these new mail-in ballots happened in states without a strong history of large batches of mail-in ballots. • That means they may not have the experience or safeguards in place that the non-partisan experts say are necessary. “Remember, even Barack Obama said that honest mail-in voting requires proper signature verification. So did Jimmy Carter in a bi-partisan commission.” –Kevin Freeman page 6 THE EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100) C. Safeguards were Ignored – According to court cases, affidavits, and witnesses, the safeguards were ignored or removed, particularly in those six crucial counties. • We have testimonies of mail-in ballots without chain of custody. • We have reports of mail-in ballots cast that were sent to dead voters, or people who moved. Or addresses where the supposed voter didn’t even live. • Then there’s the risk that the mail-in ballot was intercepted from the mailbox or voted by another person who lives at that address. • No wonder the bi-partisan commission concluded that mail-in ballots ‘remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.’ Yet nearly half our ballots were cast by mail for the first time in American history. D. Rejection rates for Mail in Ballots Dropped - Did you know that while first-time mail-in ballots increased more than ever in history, the rejection rate for such ballots fell sharply. • You would think that with the documented risk of mail-in fraud, combined with a massive increase in first-time mail-in ballots in new areas, we would see higher, rather than lower rejection rates. But we didn’t! CASE REVIEW: • Given the fact that mail-in ballots overwhelmingly favored Biden, just using normal rejection rates would have given President Trump the win. • https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/03/democrats-more-mail-in- ballots-pennsylvania-433951 • For example, according to Ballotpedia, the mail-in ballot rejection rate for Pennsylvania in the 2018 election was 4.45% but dropped to just 0.28% this year. In Georgia, the 2018 rate was 3.1% but only 0.6% this year. https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2020:_Analysis_of_rejected_ballots • A lower rejection rate means that more votes were counted for Biden. It’s as simple as that. • And this is just a small part of the irregularities that we saw in the 2020 election. All of this is documented. page 7 THE EVIDENCE SP.1230 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/30/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 100) NOTE: Because we don’t have chain of custody or the other safeguards in place, it is virtually impossible to know if the Biden margin is real or fraudulent without thoroughly and properly examining those ballots. That is essentially what the bi- partisan NEDC warned in advance of the election.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BBC Trust 180 Great Portland Street, London W1W 5QZ
    BBC Trust 180 Great Portland Street, London W1W 5QZ 25 January 2010 Dear sir/madam We are writing in relation to an item that appeared on the BBC news website on 17 December ‘Jewish man jeered at SOAS university debate’ (appendix 1). Along with many other people we contacted the BBC and a revised version appeared late the following day (appendix 2) While we were pleased that a revised version appeared, the BBC has never stated publically that the original version contained many serious errors it continues to circulate on the Internet. Without a clear BBC disavowal it is far more difficult to challenge those who continue to misuse the original as evidence of BBC endorsement of patently false allegations. As joint organisers of the meeting we therefore ask the BBC to make a public statement that the original story contains multiple errors of fact and make unjustifiable claims and is a piece of journalism of which falls far short of their expected standards. This will enable us and the BBC to contest reproduction of the article or uncritical reference to it. In response to our initial complaint we received a reply from Hugh Berlyn, Editor, BBC News and Sports Interactive (see appendix 3). We contacted Mr Berlyn to express our continuing concerns (see appendix 4). However Mr Berlyn replied on 20 January only to say, “Thank you for your email. I have nothing further to add to me earlier response.” He gave us no further guidance on how to pursue our complaint. When we asked for details of the next step he directed us not to the trust not to the Editorial Complaints Unit at White City.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing US Elections Against Cyber Threats
    September 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE QUENTIN E. HODGSON, MARYGAIL K. BRAUNER, EDWARD W. CHAN Securing U.S. Elections Against Cyber Threats Considerations for Supply Chain Risk Management n January 9, 2020, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration heard testimony from the chief exec- utive officers of Election Systems and Software (ES&S), Hart InterCivic, and Dominion Voting Systems, the three largest O 1 vendors of U.S. election equipment. The committee chair asked each of the three leaders whether their companies’ equipment contained compo- nents from either Russia or China, basing her question on a recent Interos report that stated that 20 percent of the components in one major elec- tion equipment vendor’s machine came from China.2 All three executives noted that they use Chinese-manufactured components in their election equipment, in part because they did not have viable domestic sources for these components.3 The hearing reflects a broader concern about the exposure that technology supply chains have to China, combined with a widening focus on election security in the United States that gained C O R P O R A T I O N prominence following Russian interference in the election officials around the country to offer cyber- 2016 elections but has extended to encompass many security services and advice. As part of that work, worries about foreign actors’ ability to interfere with CISA convened two advisory councils, one of gov- a core component of American democracy. ernment officials from the federal, state, and local In January 2017, then–Secretary of Homeland levels in a government coordinating council (GCC) Security Jeh Johnson declared election infrastruc- and the other drawing from the election system ture to be part of the nation’s critical infrastruc- vendor community in a sector coordinating council ture, designating it a subsector of the Government (SCC).
    [Show full text]
  • The Qanon Conspiracy
    THE QANON CONSPIRACY: Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy THE QANON CONSPIRACY: PRESENTED BY Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy NETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE POLARIZATION AND EXTREMISM RESEARCH POWERED BY (NCRI) INNOVATION LAB (PERIL) Alex Goldenberg Brian Hughes Lead Intelligence Analyst, The Network Contagion Research Institute Caleb Cain Congressman Denver Riggleman Meili Criezis Jason Baumgartner Kesa White The Network Contagion Research Institute Cynthia Miller-Idriss Lea Marchl Alexander Reid-Ross Joel Finkelstein Director, The Network Contagion Research Institute Senior Research Fellow, Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience, Rutgers University SPECIAL THANKS TO THE PERIL QANON ADVISORY BOARD Jaclyn Fox Sarah Hightower Douglas Rushkoff Linda Schegel THE QANON CONSPIRACY ● A CONTAGION AND IDEOLOGY REPORT FOREWORD “A lie doesn’t become truth, wrong doesn’t become right, and evil doesn’t become good just because it’s accepted by the majority.” –Booker T. Washington As a GOP Congressman, I have been uniquely positioned to experience a tumultuous two years on Capitol Hill. I voted to end the longest government shut down in history, was on the floor during impeachment, read the Mueller Report, governed during the COVID-19 pandemic, officiated a same-sex wedding (first sitting GOP congressman to do so), and eventually became the only Republican Congressman to speak out on the floor against the encroaching and insidious digital virus of conspiracy theories related to QAnon. Certainly, I can list the various theories that nest under the QAnon banner. Democrats participate in a deep state cabal as Satan worshiping pedophiles and harvesting adrenochrome from children. President-Elect Joe Biden ordered the killing of Seal Team 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump, the Changes: Aanti
    Ethnic and Racial Studies ISSN: 0141-9870 (Print) 1466-4356 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rers20 Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution Ed Pertwee To cite this article: Ed Pertwee (2020): Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution, Ethnic and Racial Studies, DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 17 Apr 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 193 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rers20 ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution Ed Pertwee Department of Sociology, London School of Economics, London, UK ABSTRACT This article explores the “counter-jihad”, a transnational field of anti-Muslim political action that emerged in the mid-2000s, becoming a key tributary of the recent far- right insurgency and an important influence on the Trump presidency. The article draws on thematic analysis of content from counter-jihad websites and interviews with movement activists, sympathizers and opponents, in order to characterize the counter-jihad’s organizational infrastructure and political discourse and to theorize its relationship to fascism and other far-right tendencies. Although the political discourses of the counter-jihad, Trumpian Republicanism and the avowedly racist “Alt-Right” are not identical, I argue that all three tendencies share a common, counterrevolutionary temporal structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticide OAN Network
    24 www.sdbj.com MAY 4, 2020 Insecticide from page 6 third the cost of bio-pesticides.” The sustainable factor is likely also to be a selling point for Agragene. Climate change“ and the way ag is done today is not a sustainable future. GORDON ALTON “Climate change and the way ag is done today is not a sustainable future,” Alton said. “Spraying chemicals all the time leads to chemical resistance.” Alton said that climate change has led to more bugs showing up earlier. They live longer; they are more active. Agragene is work- ing on an eco-friendly solution. Photo courtesy of One America News Network Drone Delivery Liz Wheeler is the host of “Tipping Point with Liz Wheeler” seen nightly on One America News Network. Agragene plans to use drones to de- AT&T TV—a new video product available As a National News Network, How Do liver its sterile insects. for every home nationwide—DirecTV, You Think OAN and Its Mission Will According to Alton, drones can cover OAN Network and AT&T U-Verse. In addition, OAN is Have Changed When the COVID-19 an acre in one to two minutes. They are from page 1 available on streaming products such as Crisis is Over? currently being used in a couple states. KlowdTV.com, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, COVID-19 has reinforced our mission The company says it would partner with They first Herring and Apple TV. to keep our viewers informed with the a drone service rather than operate its launched sister Networks, Inc. latest and most accurate news possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Election 2 Contents
    Covering the Coverage The 2020 Election 2 Contents 4 Foreword 29 Us versus him Kyle Pope Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 5 Why did Matt Drudge turn on August 10, 2020 Donald Trump? Bob Norman 37 The campaign begins (again) January 29, 2020 Kyle Pope August 12, 2020 8 One America News was desperate for Trump’s approval. 39 When the pundits paused Here’s how it got it. Simon van Zuylen–Wood Andrew McCormick Summer 2020 May 27, 2020 47 Tuned out 13 The story has gotten away from Adam Piore us Summer 2020 Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 57 ‘This is a moment for June 3, 2020 imagination’ Mychal Denzel Smith, Josie Duffy 22 For Facebook, a boycott and a Rice, and Alex Vitale long, drawn-out reckoning Summer 2020 Emily Bell July 9, 2020 61 How to deal with friends who have become obsessed with 24 As election looms, a network conspiracy theories of mysterious ‘pink slime’ local Mathew Ingram news outlets nearly triples in size August 25, 2020 Priyanjana Bengani August 4, 2020 64 The only question in news is ‘Will it rate?’ Ariana Pekary September 2, 2020 3 66 Last night was the logical end 92 The Doociness of America point of debates in America Mark Oppenheimer Jon Allsop October 29, 2020 September 30, 2020 98 How careful local reporting 68 How the media has abetted the undermined Trump’s claims of Republican assault on mail-in voter fraud voting Ian W. Karbal Yochai Benkler November 3, 2020 October 2, 2020 101 Retire the election needles 75 Catching on to Q Gabriel Snyder Sam Thielman November 4, 2020 October 9, 2020 102 What the polls show, and the 78 We won’t know what will happen press missed, again on November 3 until November 3 Kyle Pope Kyle Paoletta November 4, 2020 October 15, 2020 104 How conservative media 80 E.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Editorial Guidelines Consultation
    Response to The BBC’s Editorial Guidelines Consultation 1. Introduction 1.1. The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), seeks to represents the common interest of the UK’s diverse Muslim communities. Founded in 1997, it is the largest umbrella body of its kind in the UK with over 500 affiliates. It is pledged to work for the common good of society as a whole. A democratic body underpinned by a constitution, the Muslim Council of Britain’s affiliate base reflects the diversity of Muslims in the UK, being made up of hundreds of mosques, educational and charitable bodies, cultural and relief agencies and women and youth groups and associations across the UK from a range of ethnic, geographical and theological backgrounds and traditions. 1.2. The MCB has launched a Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), whose goal is to promote fair and responsible reporting of Muslims and Islam through constructive engagement. This submission is on behalf of the CfMM. 1.3. The BBC is a public service broadcaster with the important core mission of informing, educating and entertaining, and aims to be a trusted guide for everyone. Two of its five public purposes are to “provide impartial news and information to help people understand and engage with the world around them” and to “reflect, represent and serve the diverse communities of all of the United Kingdom’s nations and regions…” (Section 1, Purposes 1 and 4) – purposes that are relevant to this submission and cited in the Draft Guidelines. 1.4. There is an expectation that it continues to aspire to highest standards with respect to independence, impartiality and integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • IBLJ V.26 Summer2021 Draft
    VOLUME 26 SUMMER 2021 ILLINOIS BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL RAGE AGAINST THE VOTING MACHINE: DOMINION’S DEFAMATION LAWSUIT AGAINST SIDNEY POWELL ❖ Article ❖ Dr. Michael Conklin* I. INTRODUCTION On January 8, 2021, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., filed a defamation lawsuit against Sidney Powell.1 The 124-page complaint—drafted by the law firm of noted libel attorney Tom Clare—is based on Powell’s claims that Dominion rigged the 2020 presidential election.2 This Article examines the relevant issues of false statement of fact, damages, causation, and actual malice. Additionally, a unique privilege that may be available to Powell is considered. II. FALSE STATEMENT OF FACT Some of Powell’s statements could be dismissed as either opinion or partial truths. Her claim that “there’s no way there was anything but widespread election fraud”3 could be classified as opinion since the word “widespread” is highly subjective and “election fraud” can refer to different occurrences. Additionally, recounts in Georgia did find discrepancies in the originally reported totals.4 So in a literal sense, the exact vote tallies originally reported were incorrect. However, the discrepancies * Powell Endowed Professor of Business Law, Angelo State University. 1. Complaint, US Dominion, Inc. v. Powell, No. 1:21-cv-00040 (D.D.C. Jan. 8, 2021). 2. Id. 3. Id. at 26. 4. Joe Walsh, Recount Trims Biden’s Lead in Georgia by over 1,000 Votes, FORBES (Nov. 17, 2020, 5:37 PM), https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/11/17/recount-trims-bidens-lead- in-georgia-by-over-1000-votes/?sh=4d9080df9b84. 1 Rage Against the Voting Machine [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 2 – Channel Lineup
    Exhibit 2 BASIC PACKAGE STANDARD PACKAGE Channel/Network SD HD Channel/Network SD HD Channel/Network SD HD Channel/Network SD HD Includes the following: Includes Basic plus the following: E! 282 682 Paramount Network 253 653 Sportsman Channel 162 562 MC Easy Listening 812 ESPN 100 500 Science Channel 267 667 TBS 255 655 MC Gospel 813 Channel/Network SD HD Channel/Network SD HD ESPN Classic 103 SEC Network 142 542 Tennis Channel 131 531 MC Hip Hop & R&B 814 ABC (WTEN) 2 402 Discovery Channel 200 600 ESPN2 101 501 Sports New York 113 513 Travel Channel 207 607 MC Hip Hop Classics 815 Hallmark Channel 192 592 Food Network 273 673 Turner Classic Movies 845 MC Hit List 816 Bounce (WXXA) 50 Syfy Channel 300 700 Hallmark Movies & Mysteries 328 728 FOX Business News 63 463 Teen Nick 227 627 Universal Kids 228 628 MC Indie 817 BYU TV 180 580 INSP 298 698 FOX News Channel 62 462 TNT 252 652 Viceland 301 701 MC Jazz 818 CBS (WRGB) 3 403 Investigation Discovery 264 664 FOX Sports 1 104 504 Toku 235 635 YouToo America 302 MC Kidz Only 819 MC Light Classical 820 Charge (WCWN) 46 Outdoor Channel 160 560 FOX Sports 2 105 505 USA Network 190 590 RFD TV 208 Freeform 232 632 MC Love Songs 821 Comet (WRGB) 44 VH1 315 715 TLC 268 668 FX 250 650 TRUE HD CHANNELS*** MC Max 822 CSPAN 80 480 YES 116 516 Tru TV 303 FXX 251 651 Add to any package: MC Metal 823 CSPAN 2 81 481 TV Land 191 Golf Channel 130 530 MC Mexicana 824 CW (WCWN) 21 421 WE TV 287 687 GSN 297 697 EXPANDED PACKAGE MC Musica Urbana 825 Weather Channel 70 470 Headline News 65 465 Channel/Network
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:10-Cv-06923-JSR Document 35 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 3
    Case 1:10-cv-06923-JSR Document 35 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE and WORKING FAMILIES PARTY, Civil Action No: Plaintiffs, 10-cv-6923 (JSR) - against - DECLARATION OF JOHN POULOS IN OPPOSITION NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION JAMES A. WALSH, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER, FOR A PRELIMINARY EVELYN J. AQUILA, and GREGORY P. INJUNCTION____________ PETERSON, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the New York State Board of Elections; TODD D. VALENTINE and ROBERT A. BREHM, in their official capacities as Co-Executive Directors of the New York State Board of Elections, Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------------X JOHN POULOS, declares as follows: 1. I am the President of Dominion Voting System Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Dominion”), and in such capacity am familiar with the facts and circumstances of the within proceeding. I have a degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. I have 13 years’ experience in the hardware/software industry. I have held the position of President with Dominion for 8 years, and am very familiar with all of Dominion’s engineering efforts as it pertains to election equipment. As such, I am fully familiar with the Image Cast voting machines currently being used in the State of New York and which will be used in the upcoming election scheduled for November 2, 2010. 2. I submit this affidavit on behalf of defendants in opposition to plaintiffs’ Case 1:10-cv-06923-JSR Document 35 Filed 10/08/10 Page 2 of 3 motion for a preliminary injunction for an order enjoining the Board’s practice, in accordance with Election Law §9-112(4), of crediting a “double vote” for a single candidate to the candidate’s party line which appears first on the ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of 'Stop the Steal' Post-Election Trajectories for Right-Wing Mobilization in the Us
    DECEMBER 2020 THE FUTURE OF 'STOP THE STEAL' POST-ELECTION TRAJECTORIES FOR RIGHT-WING MOBILIZATION IN THE US About the US Crisis Monitor ​ The US Crisis Monitor supports data-driven initiatives to build community ​ resilience and facilitate efforts to track, prevent, and mitigate political violence in America. A joint project of the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) and the Bridging Divides Initiative (BDI) at Princeton University, the US Crisis Monitor provides the public with real-time data ​ and analysis on political violence and demonstrations around the country, establishing an evidence base from which to identify risks, hotspots, and available resources to empower local communities in times of crisis. Contents Introduction 4 Shifting Trends: Pre- and Post-Election 7 Dominant Protest Movements 7 Armed Group Activity 11 Potential Trajectories 15 (1) Demonstrations limited largely to militia groups 15 (2) Mass mobilization of decentralized, armed individuals 18 (3) Increasing attacks by violent sole perpetrators 19 (4) Unarmed mass mobilization 21 Conclusion 23 2 Authors Dr. Roudabeh Kishi is the Director of Research & Innovation at ACLED. She oversees the quality, ​ production, and coverage of all ACLED data across the globe; leads research and analysis across regional teams; aids in new partnerships with local sources and users; and supports the capacity building of NGOs and conflict observatories around the world. Dr. Kishi holds a Ph.D. in Government and Politics from the University of Maryland with specializations in international relations and quantitative methodology. Hampton Stall is a Senior Researcher at ACLED and a conflict anthropologist with a Masters in Development Practice from Emory University.
    [Show full text]
  • PUB MARTÍNANDRADES TFG.Pdf
    Resumen: En este trabajo se estudia a la organización internacional The Movement y a su principal promotor, Steve Bannon, para determinar el impacto de la alt-right. Para ello, se ha realizado una revisión bibliográfica que permita conocer el éxito de su propaganda, la motivación y los personajes políticos vinculados a la organización más relevantes. Palabras clave: The Movement, Steve Bannon, alt-right, propaganda, política internacional. Posverdad. Abstract: In this work, the international organization The Movement and its main promoter, Steve Bannon, are studied to establish the impact of the alt-right. To do this, a bibliographic review has been carried out to determine the success of its propaganda, the motivation and the most relevant political figures linked to the organization. Keywords: The Movement, Steve Bannon, alt-right, propaganda, international politics, post-truth. 1 Índice 1. Steve Bannon……………………………………………………………….3 2. The Movement……………………………………………………………...4 3. Miembros The Movement……………………………………….………….6 3.1 Las caras internas………………………………………….………….6 3.1.1 El equipo de Bannon…………………………….………….6 3.1.2 Financiación privada……………………………………….12 3.2 Principales políticos afines de Norteamérica y Europa………………17 4. Posverdad……………………………………………………………...…..22 5. Propaganda de la alt-right………………………………………………....28 5.1 Principios de propaganda de Goebbels………………………………28 5.2 Medios de comunicación………………………………………...…..40 5.3 Chivo expiatorio………………...…………….....…………….….....42 5.4 Enemigos de The Movement…………………………………………45 6. Los valores de The Movement…………………………………...………..52 6.1 Populismo……………………………………………………………52 6.2 Nacionalismo económico………………………………...………….54 6.3 Supremacismo blanco………………………………...……………..55 7. La madurez de The Movement……………………...…………………….56 7.1 Elecciones europeas 2019……………………………………...……56 7.2 Bolsonaro y la alt-right en Latinoamérica…………………………..57 7.3 The Movement en España………….....…………...…………………61 8.
    [Show full text]