DOCSLIB.ORG

ELECTION FRAUD TRUTH SUMMIT ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™ Election Fraud - Special Report 3.117 CLEARED for RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle Plantm Points: 200)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ELECTION FRAUD TRUTH SUMMIT ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™ Election Fraud - Special Report 3.117 CLEARED for RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle Plantm Points: 200) APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION ELECTION FRAUD TRUTH SUMMIT ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™ Election Fraud - special Report 3.117 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 200) Election Fraud Truth Summit Special Report – In partnership with the Citizen Coalition EveryLegalVote.com Your Economic Battle Plan™ today has a very special topic and a very special purpose. The election of 2020 is one of the biggest economic battles we have faced as Americans. Literally trillions of dollars are at stake and in the end, it is your money. Foreign governments, corrupt bureaucrats, crony capitalists and the Deep State all have a vested interest in getting the outcome they want. They win. You lose. Unless we do something and take a stand now. This is a TAKE ACTION briefing to protect your money, your livelihood, and your way of life. Your Briefing Today Will: • Walk through the irregularities of the 2020 election. • Provide a new resources where you can learn more about fair elections. • Introduce you to the people on the front lines fighting this battle. • Expose those who want to steal from you, including foreign interference. • Debunk the debunkers. • Show you the truth. • Give you actions you can take to protect our Constitution and stand for election integrity. “Anyone who says the 2020 election was normal or says, ‘nothing to see here’ is LYING TO YOU and we will prove it.”–Kevin Freeman Your Mission: 1. To take action, hold the line for Election Integrity, and understand the real fraud taking place in US elections. 2. To encourage Attorney General William Barr to ‘Do His Job’ as it relates to investigating election fraud and ensuring election integrity. page 2 Election Fraud - special Report 3.117 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 200) Ep. 3-117 (OSINT) Open-Sourced Intelligence Special Report. This is a Special Report with Kevin Freeman. It is comprehensive and includes subject matter experts in Election Fraud, Cyber, Intelligence, and Legal. “There is foreign interference in our elections. For every dollar Russia spends affecting our election, Soros spends $3 and China spends $10.” –Col. John Mills 1. First, We Want to Share More About the Website Everylegalvote.com and Why it Was Formed. Everylegalvote.com (ELV) is a website formed by concerned citizens and the Economic War Room team. You can find it at www.EveryLegalVote.com. ELV is your website, it includes memes, stories, election fraud reports, videos, education, and most important and easy way to TAKE ACTION. The citizen coalition wanted to form a way to enable you to get involved and make a difference. The site is getting better every day and keeps track of the information the deep state and social media companies are banning and blocking. WARNING: While we have received positive feedback from those looking for information and truth beyond the big tech censorship, we have created our own Hall of Shame page for those who are trying to censor our information. SOME of our FAVORITE REVIEWS and Badge of Honors include: Snopes - If you ask Snopes, they say this is a false website. But then, do you really trust SNOPES? No Surprise - The New York Times has also attacked it. We see this as a badge of honor! We encourage you to go to the website and explore the data and insights you may not be seeing anywhere else. Go to https://everylegalvote.com. page 3 Election Fraud - special Report 3.117 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 200) . Everylegalvote.com is a place where concerned citizens can read fraud reports or even report fraud yourself. Attached to the end of this Economic Battle Plan™ is a 98-page Open Letter that is being sent to the Department of Justice (DOJ). ELV is your website. It includes memes, stories, videos, education, and most important easy TAKE ACTION steps you can do to make a difference. We are updating it daily and it is getting better every. The goal is to keep track of the stuff the deep state media and social media companies are banning and blocking. 2. Objections? Answers to the Three Biggest Objections You May Be Hearing. We want to help counter the narrative with the truth. Despite all of the evidence, the media and politicians are bombarding a message that’s causing a lot of people to give up. There are three main objections we want to address in this briefing to help equip patriots with what is really happening. Objection #1: The media has debunked all the fraud reports. This is a very dirty trick designed to manipulate you. I can give you one example. We showed you that “fact checker Snopes claims that McAfee said our website contains malware.” But McAfee certified our website as malware free! Another trick is often how they word something. But sometimes, they just outright LIE. You may have heard of suitcase under tables in Georgia. Media says “debunked.” Mollie Hemingway at The Federalist proved them 100% wrong. Have you noticed that the debunkers never debunk claims of the LEFT? And the debunkers rarely show the proof. They tend to just quote people saying something’s not true. And the people they quote are always part of the problem. So, Dominion Securities is quoted to disprove allegations of fraud at Dominion Securities. page 4 Election Fraud - special Report 3.117 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 200) Here’s the truth. In 2012, the New York Times warned that mail-in ballots were a huge risk for election fraud. As recently as three months ago, all experts agreed that voting machines were vulnerable to hacking and manipulation. Other key points to consider: • Don’t be a science denier! In 2012, the National Academy of Sciences published a paper that said statistical anomalies were major indicators of election fraud. This is science, the same kind that is used all the time in court rooms and to send rockets into space and design bridges. • All those who debunk the risks of mail-in voting, or voting machines like Dominion Systems, or claiming that statistical analysis is meaningless are misleading you at best. Some are just plain lying. • The only reason they are claiming “nothing to see here” is BECAUSE THEY BENEFIT FROM THE OUTCOME. “Frankly, I think it’s a tell that many Republican politicians want to accept the results and move on. Gee, I wonder, have any of them been compromised? Are they hoping for better treatment in a Biden Administration? Have any of them benefited from rigged elections?” –Kevin Freeman Despite Media Misinformation Attempts: You Are Part of the Majority that believe fraud influenced the Election! According to a YouGov poll, 75% of voters believe fraud influenced the election. Of those, more than half believe the fraud was pervasive enough to have influenced the outcome. BOTTOM LINE: Politicians may be unwilling to admit the fraud, but the American people know better. Don’t let the media say it is all debunked. You know there’s fraud and 75% of Americans agree with you. page 5 Election Fraud - special Report 3.117 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 200) Objection #2: “If there were fraud, why isn’t Trump winning in Court?” • Have you noticed that the lawsuit dismissals are mostly for reasons like, “you don’t have standing,” or “it was filed too late,” or “this should be in state court,” Or “this should be in Federal Court.” • The reality is that most of these courts don’t want to touch this for anything. They would rather not look because if they did, they might have to do something. That’s true for Republican judges and Democrat judges. They all wish someone else would do something. • But don’t lose heart. The fraud is real and sooner or later it will come out. Which brings us to the next objection. Objection #3: Isn’t all of this too late? • Just as a reminder, this was published for the first time on December 8th. • The Bush v. Gore decision wasn’t decided in the Supreme Court until December 12. There were elections decided even later than that in history. Until the electors meet and vote in the Electoral College, it’s not too late. And the Supreme Court can adjust the dates, if needed, to route out fraud. • Bottom line: the stakes are too high to rush through this. We need to let the process work for the sake of our nation’s future. For the rest of this briefing, we bring in top subject matter experts to share the truth around what is really happening. Obviously, we encourage all of our readers to review source data and make their own decisions. 3. Perspective From President Trump’s Legal Team – Joe diGenova Joe diGenova, one of President Trump’s top lawyers. He has had an incredible career in the legal profession and served as the United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, which is the largest such office in the country. He answers key questions below. • Let’s look at the fact that the lawsuits are being lost is proof that no substantive fraud page 6 Election Fraud - special Report 3.117 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 200) occurred. Certainly not enough to change the election. What is the real status of the lawsuits and why are you optimistic? “Well, first of all, both the reporting and the judicial work on this has been just awful. We have presented huge amounts of evidence of vote manipulation, computer problems, backdating, failure to have signatures, illegal mailing ballots, illegal absentee ballots, observers being kept out of the counting areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Filed by Tailwind Acquisition Corp. Pursuant to Rule 425 Under The
    Filed by Tailwind Acquisition Corp. pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933 and deemed filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Subject Company: Tailwind Acquisition Corp. Commission File No. 001-39489 As Merger Nears, Tailwind Acquisition Corp. Highlights QOMPLX’s Strong Business Growth and Momentum Tailwind applauds QOMPLX’s continued acceleration of business momentum, new partnerships, elite talent hires, intellectual property expansion, groundbreaking new products, and media coverage Source: QOMPLX and Tailwind Los Angeles, CA., July 12, 2021 -- In advance of the approaching July 20th shareholder meeting, Tailwind Acquisition Corp. (NYSE: TWND) (“Tailwind”), a special purpose acquisition company, is proud to highlight the robust growth achieved in 2021 by its business combination company QOMPLX, Inc. (“QOMPLX”). Since the original announcement on March 2, 2021, the global focus on cybersecurity has immensely accelerated given the increase in ransomware attacks, and QOMPLX has continued to execute well this year, with major accomplishments that include: ● Winning several large new contracts from premier customers (both new and existing), including the U.S. Navy, NASA, and leading global corporations including banks, insurers, logistics, and professional services firms ● Reliably defeating Microsoft’s Defender for Identity, Tenable.ad, and Crowdstrike’s Preempt identity solutions for long-term contracts in leading global corporations ─ including one of the world’s largest banks ● Announcing
    [Show full text]
  • Securing US Elections Against Cyber Threats
    September 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE QUENTIN E. HODGSON, MARYGAIL K. BRAUNER, EDWARD W. CHAN Securing U.S. Elections Against Cyber Threats Considerations for Supply Chain Risk Management n January 9, 2020, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration heard testimony from the chief exec- utive officers of Election Systems and Software (ES&S), Hart InterCivic, and Dominion Voting Systems, the three largest O 1 vendors of U.S. election equipment. The committee chair asked each of the three leaders whether their companies’ equipment contained compo- nents from either Russia or China, basing her question on a recent Interos report that stated that 20 percent of the components in one major elec- tion equipment vendor’s machine came from China.2 All three executives noted that they use Chinese-manufactured components in their election equipment, in part because they did not have viable domestic sources for these components.3 The hearing reflects a broader concern about the exposure that technology supply chains have to China, combined with a widening focus on election security in the United States that gained C O R P O R A T I O N prominence following Russian interference in the election officials around the country to offer cyber- 2016 elections but has extended to encompass many security services and advice. As part of that work, worries about foreign actors’ ability to interfere with CISA convened two advisory councils, one of gov- a core component of American democracy. ernment officials from the federal, state, and local In January 2017, then–Secretary of Homeland levels in a government coordinating council (GCC) Security Jeh Johnson declared election infrastruc- and the other drawing from the election system ture to be part of the nation’s critical infrastruc- vendor community in a sector coordinating council ture, designating it a subsector of the Government (SCC).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and DOMINIO
    Case 1:21-cv-00445-CJN Document 2 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) US DOMINION, INC., ) ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:21-cv-00445 ) MY PILLOW, INC. and ) ) MICHAEL J. LINDELL, ) ) Defendants. ) ) NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBITS 1. Plaintiffs hereby give notice of filing the attached exhibits, which are exhibits to the Complaint filed on February 17, 2021 in the case captioned above [D.E. 1] and listed below. All exhibits listed below have been electronically filed pursuant to LCvR 5.4(a) unless otherwise noted. 2. Due to their nature, certain exhibits listed below are unable to be filed electronically through the Court’s ECF System. These exhibits are identified in the “Location” column below. A transcribed copy of each of those exhibits has been electronically filed through the Court’s ECF System with the corresponding Exhibit Number pursuant to LCvR 5.4(a), unless otherwise noted. Upon request, Plaintiffs can arrange for files of those exhibits to be delivered to the Court. Exhibit Description Location No. 1 Georgia Secretary of State, Elections Security Is Our Top Priority: Security-Focused Tech Company, Dominion Voting to Implement New 1 Case 1:21-cv-00445-CJN Document 2 Filed 02/22/21 Page 2 of 22 Verified Paper Ballot System, available at, https://sos.ga.gov/securevoting/. 2 Emma Brown, Aaron C. Davis & Alice Crites, Sidney Powell’s secret ‘military intelligence expert,’ key to fraud claims in election lawsuits, never worked in military intelligence, Wash.
    [Show full text]
  • VA SHIVA Runs for U.S
    '-.i Of:-''"}-'P.[) ^ REMED. , '-.(vnoN 8J|. ELECTIONCl. crTiniJ rut'. ",v*. ^17 2C!7 Jl'S 23 ffl 2: 25 Holllston, MA 01746 ^•":rEOF GENERAL June 16, 2017 - • • s M-or! SSELEHSiZ: Office of General Counsel MUR Federal Election Commission 999 E. Street, NW Washington, DC 20463 4 To whom it may concern. I am writing to file an official complaint against Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to be running for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts. I am enclosing a copy of a printout from his business web page which is also used to publicize his campaign. Use of a business web page for a campaign is a violation of FEC rules. Additionally, even if allowed, the web page lacks the appropriate disclaimer In a box as per FEC rules. A Thank you for jtour attention to this matter. 1I Page Commonwealth of Massachusetts Middlesex, ss June 2017 On this day o; before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Martin A. fcamb, proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which were Massachusetts Driver's License, to be the person who signed the preceding or attached document in my presence, and who swore or affirmed to me that the contents of the document are truthful and accurate to the best of his knowledge and belief. (official signature and seal of notary) My commission expires:._ yd/z-?-// 7- GHBISTINE REESOR NotSryRoblic • CbMMlaNV/EAiiH.OF MSSACHUSETTS " MyCommlssidnExplrw Octobfir v. M17 : • - 1 I V. 2 I Pa g e 6/15/2017 V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai, Inventor of Email - Know The Truth, Be The Light.
    [Show full text]
  • Midterm Election Poll of Registered Voters
    Toplines: November 2018 University of Massachusetts Amherst Post- Midterm Election Poll of Registered Voters Field Dates: November 7 - November 14, 2018 Sample: 750 Registered Voters in Massachusetts Margin of Error: 4.1% for Registered Voters YouGov interviewed 796 respondents who were then matched down to a sample of 750 to produce the final dataset. The respondents were matched to a sampling frame on gender, age, race, and education. The frame was constructed by stratified sampling from the Massachusetts portion of the 2016 Current Population Survey (CPS) with selection within strata by weighted sampling with replacements (using the person weights on the public use file). The matched cases were weighted to the sampling frame using propensity scores. The matched cases and the frame were combined, and a logistic regression was estimated for inclusion in the frame. The propensity score function included age, gender, race/ethnicity, years of education, and region. The propensity scores were grouped into deciles of the estimated propensity score in the frame and post-stratified according to these deciles. All figures presented in this document are for registered adults. UMass Poll Directors/Fellows Prof. Tatishe M. Nteta, Ph.D. – Director [email protected] Prof. Raymond La Raja, Ph.D. – Associate Director [email protected] Prof. Jesse Rhodes, Ph.D. – Associate Director [email protected] Kaylee Johnson, Research Fellow [email protected] Midterm Voter Turnout (N=750) Did you vote in the midterm election that ended on Tuesday, November 6th? Yes, I definitely voted in the midterm election 92% I did not vote in the election this November.
    [Show full text]
  • The Qanon Conspiracy
    THE QANON CONSPIRACY: Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy THE QANON CONSPIRACY: PRESENTED BY Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy NETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE POLARIZATION AND EXTREMISM RESEARCH POWERED BY (NCRI) INNOVATION LAB (PERIL) Alex Goldenberg Brian Hughes Lead Intelligence Analyst, The Network Contagion Research Institute Caleb Cain Congressman Denver Riggleman Meili Criezis Jason Baumgartner Kesa White The Network Contagion Research Institute Cynthia Miller-Idriss Lea Marchl Alexander Reid-Ross Joel Finkelstein Director, The Network Contagion Research Institute Senior Research Fellow, Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience, Rutgers University SPECIAL THANKS TO THE PERIL QANON ADVISORY BOARD Jaclyn Fox Sarah Hightower Douglas Rushkoff Linda Schegel THE QANON CONSPIRACY ● A CONTAGION AND IDEOLOGY REPORT FOREWORD “A lie doesn’t become truth, wrong doesn’t become right, and evil doesn’t become good just because it’s accepted by the majority.” –Booker T. Washington As a GOP Congressman, I have been uniquely positioned to experience a tumultuous two years on Capitol Hill. I voted to end the longest government shut down in history, was on the floor during impeachment, read the Mueller Report, governed during the COVID-19 pandemic, officiated a same-sex wedding (first sitting GOP congressman to do so), and eventually became the only Republican Congressman to speak out on the floor against the encroaching and insidious digital virus of conspiracy theories related to QAnon. Certainly, I can list the various theories that nest under the QAnon banner. Democrats participate in a deep state cabal as Satan worshiping pedophiles and harvesting adrenochrome from children. President-Elect Joe Biden ordered the killing of Seal Team 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Rudy Giuliani Lawyer Says Smartmatic Smears Were “Product Disparagement” Not Full-Out Defamation – Update
    PRINT Rudy Giuliani Lawyer Says Smartmatic Smears Were “Product Disparagement” Not Full-Out Defamation – Update By Jill Goldsmith August 17, 2021 12:34pm Jill Goldsmith Co-Business Editor More Stories By Jill Rudy Giuliani Lawyer Says Smartmatic Smears Were “Product Disparagement” Not Full-Out Defamation – Update CNN’s Clarissa Ward On “Watching History Unfold” In Afghanistan ViacomCBS Sells Black Rock Building In Midtown Manhattan To Harbor Group For $760 Million VIEW ALL Rudy Giuliani AP Photo/John Minchillo Rudy Giuliani’s attorney rehashed conspiracy theories and was light on evidence when pressed by a judge Tuesday in a defamation suit brought by voting software firm Smartmatic. Joe Sibley of Camara & Sibley asked New York State Supreme Court Judge David Cohen to dismiss six of the claims against his client Giuliani because they constituted “product disparagement,” or calling the software lousy, not defamation. The latter is the charge brought by the company in a lawsuit against Fox, three of its hosts, Giuliani and Sidney Powell. Defendants have asked for the case to be dismissed and their counsel, one by one, had the chance at a long hearing today to say why, followed by rebuttals by Smartmatic’s team. Cohen asked Sibley about one of the Trump attorney’s claims — that, in Venezuela, Smartmatic “’switched votes around subtly, maybe ten percent per district, so you don’t notice it.’ Is there some support in that to show that they can’t even make out a claim for actual malice?” he asked. Here’s Sibley’s response and some of the exchange: Sibley: “I believe in the declaration there’s some discussion of how they did it, that they kind of skimmed votes here and there to flip the votes.” Cohen: “What about Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Topline Document Which Includes Likely Voter Model Questions and Wording
    Dr. Joshua J. Dyck and Dr. Francis Talty, Co-Directors http://www.uml.edu/polls @UML_CPO _____________________________________________________________________________________________ UMass Lowell/Boston Globe Survey of Massachusetts Voters Survey produced by Professor Joshua J. Dyck, Ph.D and Professor John Cluverius, Ph. D. Field Dates: October 1-7, 2018 N=791 Massachusetts Registered Voters N=485 Massachusetts Likely Voters Adjusted Margin of Error: +/- 4.4% RVs Adjusted Margin of Error: +/- 5.6% LVs Margins of error have been adjusted to include for design effects resulting from weighting and survey design features. Methodology in Brief Data collection by live interviewers from SSRS. Thi s is a probability sample of 791 Massachusetts Registered Voters (RVs) collected using an overlapping dual -frame random digit dial design with a 50% landline/50% cell phone target split. Using the method detailed on page 2, we classified 485 RVs as Likely Voters (LVs). The data were first weighted to address the imbalance that occurs because some respondents have a greater probability of being included in the frame if they have multiple landlines or both a landline and a cellular number. To ensure a representative sample, we collected demographic d ata on all respondents who were residents of Massachusetts and at least 18 years of age (including non-registered voters) so that our overall sample ca n be weighted to data on age, gender, education, race and region from the 2018 American Community Survey for Massachusetts. UMass Lowell is a public institution and releases surveys as a source of public information. We report our questionnaire in our topline document which includes likely voter model questions and wording.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Nation 2019
    REPORT TO THE NATION: 2019 FACTBOOK ON HATE & EXTREMISM IN THE U.S. & INTERNATIONALLY TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................3 Executive Summary: Report to the Nation, 2019…………………………………………………………………......................5–95 I. LATEST 2018 MAJOR U.S. CITY DATA………………………………………………………………………......................5 II. BIAS BY CITY IN 2018…………………………………………………………………......................................................6 III: 2019/2018 Latest Major U.S. City Trends: By City & Bias Motive………………………………………..................7 IV: OFFICIAL FBI & BJS DATA………………………………… ……………………………………………..........................12 V: EXTREMIST AND MASS HOMICIDES……………………………………………...................................................18 VI: HATE MIGRATES AND INCREASES ONLINE……………………………………………………………....................22 VII: RUSSIAN SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION CONTINUES…………………………………………….................29 VIII: FLUCTUATIONS AROUND CATALYTIC EVENTS AND POLITICS……………………………………..............32 IX: U.S. NGO DATA OVERVIEW – EXTREMIST GROUPS………………………………………….………..................38 X: U.S. NGO DATA – RELIGION & ETHNIC HATE …………………………………….............................................39 XI: U.S. NGO DATA – EMERGING HATREDS: HOMELESS, TRANSGENDER & JOURNALISTS ……….........44 XII: POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND THREATS………………………………………………………………….....................48 XIII: HATE CRIME VICTIMS AND OFFENDERS…………………………………………………..…………....................54 XIV: HATE CRIME PROSECUTIONS……………………………………………………………………………....................61 XV: HATE
    [Show full text]
  • IBLJ V.26 Summer2021 Draft
    VOLUME 26 SUMMER 2021 ILLINOIS BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL RAGE AGAINST THE VOTING MACHINE: DOMINION’S DEFAMATION LAWSUIT AGAINST SIDNEY POWELL ❖ Article ❖ Dr. Michael Conklin* I. INTRODUCTION On January 8, 2021, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., filed a defamation lawsuit against Sidney Powell.1 The 124-page complaint—drafted by the law firm of noted libel attorney Tom Clare—is based on Powell’s claims that Dominion rigged the 2020 presidential election.2 This Article examines the relevant issues of false statement of fact, damages, causation, and actual malice. Additionally, a unique privilege that may be available to Powell is considered. II. FALSE STATEMENT OF FACT Some of Powell’s statements could be dismissed as either opinion or partial truths. Her claim that “there’s no way there was anything but widespread election fraud”3 could be classified as opinion since the word “widespread” is highly subjective and “election fraud” can refer to different occurrences. Additionally, recounts in Georgia did find discrepancies in the originally reported totals.4 So in a literal sense, the exact vote tallies originally reported were incorrect. However, the discrepancies * Powell Endowed Professor of Business Law, Angelo State University. 1. Complaint, US Dominion, Inc. v. Powell, No. 1:21-cv-00040 (D.D.C. Jan. 8, 2021). 2. Id. 3. Id. at 26. 4. Joe Walsh, Recount Trims Biden’s Lead in Georgia by over 1,000 Votes, FORBES (Nov. 17, 2020, 5:37 PM), https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/11/17/recount-trims-bidens-lead- in-georgia-by-over-1000-votes/?sh=4d9080df9b84. 1 Rage Against the Voting Machine [Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:10-Cv-06923-JSR Document 35 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 3
    Case 1:10-cv-06923-JSR Document 35 Filed 10/08/10 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE and WORKING FAMILIES PARTY, Civil Action No: Plaintiffs, 10-cv-6923 (JSR) - against - DECLARATION OF JOHN POULOS IN OPPOSITION NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION JAMES A. WALSH, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER, FOR A PRELIMINARY EVELYN J. AQUILA, and GREGORY P. INJUNCTION____________ PETERSON, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the New York State Board of Elections; TODD D. VALENTINE and ROBERT A. BREHM, in their official capacities as Co-Executive Directors of the New York State Board of Elections, Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------------X JOHN POULOS, declares as follows: 1. I am the President of Dominion Voting System Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Dominion”), and in such capacity am familiar with the facts and circumstances of the within proceeding. I have a degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. I have 13 years’ experience in the hardware/software industry. I have held the position of President with Dominion for 8 years, and am very familiar with all of Dominion’s engineering efforts as it pertains to election equipment. As such, I am fully familiar with the Image Cast voting machines currently being used in the State of New York and which will be used in the upcoming election scheduled for November 2, 2010. 2. I submit this affidavit on behalf of defendants in opposition to plaintiffs’ Case 1:10-cv-06923-JSR Document 35 Filed 10/08/10 Page 2 of 3 motion for a preliminary injunction for an order enjoining the Board’s practice, in accordance with Election Law §9-112(4), of crediting a “double vote” for a single candidate to the candidate’s party line which appears first on the ballot.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and DOMINION
    Case 1:21-cv-02130-CJN Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 213 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION ) c/o Cogency Global ) 1025 Vermont Ave, NW, Ste. 1130 ) Washington, DC 20005, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) HERRING NETWORKS, INC., d/b/a ) ONE AMERICA NEWS NETWORK ) 101 Constitution Ave., NW ) Washington, DC 20001, ) ) CHARLES HERRING ) 17353 Circa Oriente ) Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067, ) ) ROBERT HERRING, SR. ) 4289 Rancho Las Brisas Trail ) San Diego, California 92130, ) ) CHANEL RION ) 3211 Cherry Hill Lane, NW ) Washington, DC 20007, ) ) and ) ) CHRISTINA BOBB ) 565 Pennsylvania Ave., NW ) Apt. 803 ) Washington, DC 20001, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case 1:21-cv-02130-CJN Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 213 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL April 18, 2021: “‘The majority of people [at OAN] did not believe the voter fraud claims being run on the air.’ . Mr. Golingan, the producer, said some OAN employees had hoped Dominion would sue the channel. ‘A lot of people said, “This is insane, and maybe if they sue us, we’ll stop putting stories like this out,”’ he said.” Former OAN Producer Marty Golingan, quoted in the New York times, and fired by OAN the day after the statements were published 1. On the actual facts, the November 2020 election was a huge success for Dominion. In jurisdiction after jurisdiction, in 28 states, in the midst of a highly disruptive pandemic, Dominion’s voting machines facilitated efficient and reliable voting with accurate tallying of votes.
    [Show full text]