Flight Testing of the F/A-18E/F Automatic Carrier Landing System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flight Testing of the F/A-18E/F Automatic Carrier Landing System Flight Testing of the F/A-lSE/F Automatic Carrier Landing System] Arthur L. Prickett Christopher J. Parkes Naval Air System Command Naval Air System Command 2 1947 Nickles Rd. Bldg. 1641 2 1947 Nickles Rd. Bldg. 164 1 Patuxent River, MD 20670- 1500 Patuxent River, MD 20670-1500 (301) 342-0774 (301) 342-4645 prickettj [email protected] [email protected] .mil Abstract-The F/A-lSE/F is the U.S.Navy’s premier strike upon which the aircraft was initially qualified for Mode I, fighter aircraft, manufactured by the Boeing Company. The totally automatic, approaches and landings to the aircraft F/A-l8E/F aircraft, while maintaining a hgh degree of carrier. The paper briefly describes the key components of commonality with the F/A-l8C/D aircraft, has a lengthened the F/A-l8E/F’s ACLS, including cockpit displays and fuselage, larger wing and control surfaces, strengthened controls, antennas, autothrottles and flight control landing gear, an improved propulsion system including a implementation, and interface with the shipboard AN/SPN- growth version of the General Electric F404 engine 46(V) ACLS. Test procedures and methodology are designated the F414-GE-400, and larger high performance presented as well as test results and interpretation. Finally, inlets. This paper concentrates on the development, test, lessons learned are presented and recommendations are and evaluation of the F/A-l8E/F Automatic Carrier Landing made for future aircraft ACLS developmental test and System (ACLS) up to and including the Third Sea Trials, evaluation efforts. U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright. 5-2593 TABLEOF CONTENTS The paper briefly describes the key components of the FIA- 18E/F's ACLS, including cockpit displays and controls, NOMENCLATURE antennas, autothrottles and flight control implementation, 0 INTRODUCTION and interface with the shipboard AN/SPN-46(V) ACLS. 0 RESULTS AND EVALUATION Test procedures and methodology are presented as well as SUPPORTING DATA test results and interpretation. Finally, lessons learned are CONCLUSION presented and recommendations are made for future aircraft RECOMMENDATIONS ACLS developmental test and evaluation efforts. LESSONS LEARNED Description of Test Aircraft and Equipment REFERENCES 0 BIOGRAPHIES F/A-18E/F General Description-The FIA-18E is a single seat carrier based strike fighter aircraft built by the Boeing NOMENCLATURE Company. The FIA-18F is the two-seat model of the Super Hornet and is configured with tandem cockpits. Due to the ACLS Automatic Carrier Landing System similarity in flying qualities in the ACLS operating FCC Flight Control Computer envelope, both versions were treated as a single aircraft, and FOST Follow-on Sea Trials used interchangeably, for the ACLS development and test ICLS Instrument Carrier Landing System effort. PALS Precision Approach and Landing System PQR PALS Quality Rating The aircraft is powered by two General Electric F414-GE- TST Third Sea Trials 400 afterburning turbofan engines utilizing Full Authority WOD Wind Over Deck Digital Ehgine Control (FADEC). The aircraft features a variable camber mid-wing with Leading Edge Extensions INTRODUCTION (LEX) mounted on each side of the fuselage. Twin vertical tails are angled outboard 20 degrees from the vertical. The Background aircraft is designed with relaxed static stability to increase maneuverability and to reduce approach and landing speed. The FlA-18ElF Super Hornet is the U.S. Navy's premier c 'The aircraft is controlled by a digital fly-by-wire flight strike fighter aircraft, manufactured by the Boeing control system through hydraulically actuated flight control Company. The FIA-18EE was designed to provide surfaces: ailerons, twin rudders, leading edge flaps, trailing additional range, payload flexibility, payload recovery, edge flaps, LEX vents, LEX spoilers, and differential survivability, and growth capabilities over the FIA- stabilators. The leading edge of the wing incorporates a 1SA/BIC/D aircraft. The F/A- 18E/F aircraft, while "snag", which increases outboard wing area and increases maintaining a high degree commonality with the FIA- of roll authority in the approach and landing configuration. 18C/D aircraft, has a lengthened fuselage, larger wing and Basic weight is approximately 31,500 pounds for the FIA- control surfaces, strengthened landing gear, an improved 18E and 32,000 pounds for the FIA-18F. Additional propulsion system including a growth version of the General information on the FIA-18EE aircraft may be found in Electric F404 engine designated the F414-GE-400, and reference [l]. larger high performance inlets. The aircraft also incorporates additional wing stations and provides two AN/SPN--46(V) Automatic Carrier Landing System added internal volume, power, and cooling provisions for (ACLS)--The shipboard based ANISPN-46 ACLS consists growth avionics. of a prec:ision tracking radar, general purpose computer, and data link transmitter, and is designed to automatically As part of the Navy's acquisition program phase known as control an ACLS equipped airplane to touchdown when Engineering, Manufacturing, and Development (EMD), the operating in it's highest mode (referred to as Mode I). FIA- 18E/F's compatibility with the ANISPN-46 Automatic Radar tracking of a beacon system (ANIAPN-202) in the Carrier Landing System (ACLS) had to be developed and airplane establishes the airplane's position in space. demonstrated. This paper concentrates on the development, Computer software, containing the necessary control test, and evaluation of the F/A-l8E/F ACLS up to and equations, generates airplane vertical rate and bank angle including the Third Sea Trials, upon which the aircraft was commands to direct the airplane along the desired glide initially qualified for Mode totally automatic, approaches I, path. Commands are sent to the airplane via the data link. and landings to the aircraft carrier. The FIA-18EE's A more detailed description of the ANISPN-46 can be found predecessor, the F/A-l8C/D, with a history of outastanding in reference [2]. ACLS Mode I performance (tailhook longitudinal touchdown dispersion typically less than 25 ' (lo)), The AC',S provides for three modes of operation which can the to be met Or exceeded by the be selected by the pilot. The first is the Mode I approach FIA-18EE. which provides for fully automatic approach from the ACLS 5-2594 4 Mode I aDDrOaCh - The pilot couples the aircraft to the ACLS commands, which automatically flies the approach to touchdown. Mode IA amroach - Mode I coupled approach to 200 ft AGL, then pilot takes over to manually fly the approach to touchdown. Mode n aDDroach - The pilot manually flies the cockpit displayed guidance to touchdown. Figure 1. Typical Mode I Approach pattern entry point to touchdown on the carrier deck. The Airborne ACLS Components (FIA-lgE/F)--The airborne approach can be downgraded to a manual approach (called ACLS system of the FlA-18EE is made up of several Mode IA) at 112 nmi to touchdown. The second is a Mode different components which integrate to provide glide path I1 approach where the pilot manually controls the aircraft error displays, system status and command discretes, and in using error signal guidance provided to the cockpit displays its highest mode automatic control of the aircraft to by the ACLS from radar acquisition until touchdown. The touchdown. The shipboard ACLS radar sends out Ka-band third is a Mode I11 or Carrier Controlled Approach (CCA) interrogation pulses which are received by the RT-1028 where manual talk down control is provided from the radar radar beacon which then augments and sends back an X- acquisition gate to the point at which the pilot can acquire band return pulse via the R-1623 radar augmentor. This the Fresnel Lens Optical Landing System (FLOLS) or to the return pulse allows the shipboard subsystem to calculate the weather minimums (200 ft altitude and 112 nmi visibility). aircraft position in space relative to the ship’s ideal glide The use of an autothrottle is required for Mode MA, but is path. The errors between the aircraft’s position and the ideal optional for a Mode I1 or a Mode 111 approach. The glide path are processed by the shipboard computer to Instrument Carrier Landing System (ICLS) is an calculate appropriate lateral and vertical error signals, independent landing system that also provides monitoring of ACLS discretes, and vertical rate and bank angle commands ACLS operations. A diagram of the typical ACLS landing which are sent to the aircraft via a UHF data link in a Link-4 pattern is shown is figure 1. A simplified block diagram of format. This information is received by the aircraft’s RT- the ACLS vertical axis closed loop is shown in figure 2. 1379 data link and distributed to the Mission Computer 5-2595 Airplane b Equation IRadar Position Feedback Figure 2. Simplified ACLS Block Diagram (Vertical Loop Only) (MC), Flight Control Computer (FCC) and Commuinication rate and bank angle commands may be coupled to the Flight System Control (CSC). The MC and CSC process .the error Control Computer for an automatic approach. The vertical signals and discretes for display on the Heads-Up Display and lateral error signals may be displayed on the HUD to aid (HUD), Up-Front Control/Display (UFCD), Multi-purpose the pilot in monitoring an automatic approach or for Color Displays, and Digital Display Indicators @XIIS). If guidance during a manual approach. In addition, ACLS the pilot elects to engage the autopilot and couples to the discrete messages are transmitted via the data link and uplinked commands, the FCC uses the vertical rate and bank displayed on the HUD and/or Horizontal Situation Indicator angle to steer the aircraft onto the ideal glide path. A more (HSI). Data link signals are received by either the upper or detailed description of the aircraft's ACLS subsystems can lower forward UHF communications antennas.
Recommended publications
  • FAA Advisory Circular AC 91-74B
    U.S. Department Advisory of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Circular Subject: Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions Date:10/8/15 AC No: 91-74B Initiated by: AFS-800 Change: This advisory circular (AC) contains updated and additional information for the pilots of airplanes under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) parts 91, 121, 125, and 135. The purpose of this AC is to provide pilots with a convenient reference guide on the principal factors related to flight in icing conditions and the location of additional information in related publications. As a result of these updates and consolidating of information, AC 91-74A, Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions, dated December 31, 2007, and AC 91-51A, Effect of Icing on Aircraft Control and Airplane Deice and Anti-Ice Systems, dated July 19, 1996, are cancelled. This AC does not authorize deviations from established company procedures or regulatory requirements. John Barbagallo Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service 10/8/15 AC 91-74B CONTENTS Paragraph Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1. Purpose ..............................................................................................................................1 1-2. Cancellation ......................................................................................................................1 1-3. Definitions.........................................................................................................................1 1-4. Discussion .........................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • PROPULSION SYSTEM/FLIGHT CONTROL INTEGRATION for SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT Paul J
    PROPULSION SYSTEM/FLIGHT CONTROL INTEGRATION FOR SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT Paul J. Reukauf and Frank W. Burcham , Jr. NASA Dryden Flight Research Center SUMMARY The NASA Dryden Flight Research Center is engaged in several programs to study digital integrated control systems. Such systems allow minimization of undesirable interactions while maximizing performance at all flight conditions. One such program is the YF-12 cooperative control program. In this program, the existing analog air-data computer, autothrottle, autopilot, and inlet control systems are to be converted to digital systems by using a general purpose airborne computer and interface unit. First, the existing control laws are to be programed and tested in flight. Then, integrated control laws, derived using accurate mathematical models of the airplane and propulsion system in conjunction with modern control techniques, are to be tested in flight. Analysis indicates that an integrated autothrottle-autopilot gives good flight path control and that observers can be used to replace failed sensors. INTRODUCTION Supersonic airplanes, such as the XB-70, YF-12, F-111, and F-15 airplanes, exhibit strong interactions between the engine and the inlet or between the propul- sion system and the airframe (refs. 1 and 2) . Taking advantage of possible favor- able interactions and eliminating or minimizing unfavorable interactions is a chal- lenging control problem with the potential for significant improvements in fuel consumption, range, and performance. In the past, engine, inlet, and flight control systems were usually developed separately, with a minimum of integration. It has often been possible to optimize the controls for a single design point, but off-design control performance usually suffered.
    [Show full text]
  • Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft Rebecca Marie Johnson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Rebecca Marie, "Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11358. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11358 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using an autothrottle to compare techniques for saving fuel on A regional jet aircraft by Rebecca Marie Johnson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Electrical Engineering Program of Study Committee: Umesh Vaidya, Major Professor Qingze Zou Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Rebecca Marie Johnson, 2010. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I gratefully acknowledge everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this research. Bill Piche, my supervisor at Rockwell Collins, was supportive from day one, as were many of my colleagues. I also appreciate the efforts of my thesis committee, Drs. Umesh Vaidya, Qingze Zou, and Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Stories
    PILOT STORIES DEDICATED to the Memory Of those from the GREATEST GENERATION December 16, 2014 R.I.P. Norm Deans 1921–2008 Frank Hearne 1924-2013 Ken Morrissey 1923-2014 Dick Herman 1923-2014 "Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of earth, And danced the skies on Wings of Gold; I've climbed and joined the tumbling mirth of sun-split clouds - and done a hundred things You have not dreamed of - wheeled and soared and swung high in the sunlit silence. Hovering there I've chased the shouting wind along and flung my eager craft through footless halls of air. "Up, up the long delirious burning blue I've topped the wind-swept heights with easy grace, where never lark, or even eagle, flew; and, while with silent, lifting mind I've trod the high untrespassed sanctity of space, put out my hand and touched the face of God." NOTE: Portions Of This Poem Appear On The Headstones Of Many Interred In Arlington National Cemetery. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – Dick Herman Bermuda Triangle 4 Worst Nightmare 5 2 – Frank Hearne Coming Home 6 3 – Lee Almquist Going the Wrong Way 7 4 – Mike Arrowsmith Humanitarian Aid Near the Grand Canyon 8 5 – Dale Berven Reason for Becoming a Pilot 11 Dilbert Dunker 12 Pride of a Pilot 12 Moral Question? 13 Letter Sent Home 13 Sense of Humor 1 – 2 – 3 14 Sense of Humor 4 – 5 15 “Poopy Suit” 16 A War That Could Have Started… 17 Missions Over North Korea 18 Landing On the Wrong Carrier 19 How Casual Can One Person Be? 20 6 – Gardner Bride Total Revulsion, Fear, and Helplessness 21 7 – Allan Cartwright A Very Wet Landing 23 Alpha Strike
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing Submission for Asiana Airlines (AAR) 777-200ER HL7742 Landing Accident at San Francisco – 6 July 2013
    Michelle E. Bernson The Boeing Company Chief Engineer P.O. Box 3707 MC 07-32 Air Safety Investigation Seattle, WA 98124-2207 Commercial Airplanes 17 March 2014 66-ZB-H200-ASI-18750 Mr. Bill English Investigator In Charge National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, SW Washington DC 20594 via e-mail: [email protected] Subject: Boeing Submission for Asiana Airlines (AAR) 777-200ER HL7742 Landing Accident at San Francisco – 6 July 2013 Reference: NTSB Tech Review Meeting on 13 February 2014 Dear Mr. English: As requested during the reference technical review, please find the attached Boeing submission on the subject accident. Per your request we are sending this electronic version to your attention for distribution within the NTSB. We would like to thank the NTSB for giving us the opportunity to make this submission. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Best regardsregards,, Michelle E. E Bernson Chief Engineer Air Safety Investigation Enclosure: Boeing Submission to the NTSB for the subject accident Submission to the National Transportation Safety Board for the Asiana 777-200ER – HL7742 Landing Accident at San Francisco 6 July 2013 The Boeing Company 17 March 2014 INTRODUCTION On 6 July 2013, at approximately 11:28 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, a Boeing 777-200ER airplane, registration HL7742, operating as Asiana Airlines Flight 214 on a flight from Seoul, South Korea, impacted the seawall just short of Runway 28L at San Francisco International Airport. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident with clear visibility and sunny skies.
    [Show full text]
  • Twins in an Ever-Changing Business Aviation World, Turboprops
    Textron is betting big 16 with the Cessna Denali that turboprops have a solid future. Twins Dornier Seastar After several years of uncer- tainty, the centerline push-pull, all-composite amphibian twin appears back on track after the Dornier family formed a new joint venture (Dornier Seawings) to manufacture the aircraft with China’s Wuxi Industrial Development Group and the Wuxi Communications Industry Group. It then struck a deal in February this year for component airframe parts for the first 10 aircraft to be manu- factured at Diamond Aircraft’s by Mark Huber plant in London, Ontario, and shipped to Dornier Seawings in 16 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, In an ever-changing business aviation world, turboprops for final assembly. Produc- represent timeless value in a steady market segment. tion eventually will be shifted to China. The interior of the Seastar Perhaps it is appropriate that things do not move very fast in the turboprop segment. Consider this: can be tailored to many dif- the Dornier Seastar first flew in 1984, was certified in 1991 and apparently will at last enter production ferent operations: personal, later this year. Or that Cessna, after dipping its toes in the pressurized turboprop single market for the commercial, government or better part of a decade, finally decided to jump into the pool this year—with the Denali—and likely will corporate missions. It fea- tures a light and spacious have an aircraft to customers by 2020. Or India’s NAL Saras. After three decades of development, two cabin that can be equipped flying prototypes and reportedly nearly half a billion dollars, the Indian government finally decided to with various configurations, pull the financial feeding tube and kill it.
    [Show full text]
  • Vpa Report 2002-12-05
    UNCLASSIFIED NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND TECHNICAL REPORT REPORT NO: NAWCADPAX/TR-2002/71 REVIEW OF THE CARRIER APPROACH CRITERIA FOR CARRIER-BASED AIRCRAFT PHASE I; FINAL REPORT by Thomas Rudowsky Stephen Cook Marshall Hynes Robert Heffley Melvin Luter Thomas Lawrence CAPT Robert Niewoehner Douglas Bollman Page Senn Dr. Wayne Durham Henry Beaufrere Michael Yokell Albert Sonntag Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. UNCLASSIFIED DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND NAWCADPAX/TR-2002/71 REVIEW OF THE CARRIER APPROACH CRITERIA FOR CARRIER-BASED AIRCRAFT - PHASE I; FINAL REPORT by Thomas Rudowsky Stephen Cook Marshall Hynes Robert Heffley Melvin Luter Thomas Lawrence CAPT Robert Niewoehner Douglas Bollman Page Senn Dr. Wayne Durham Henry Beaufrere Michael Yokell Albert Sonntag NAWCADPAX/TR-2002/71 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Deck Solutions, Technologies and Services Moving the Industry Forward Garmin Innovation Brings Full Integration to Business Flight Operations and Support
    FLIGHT DECK SOLUTIONS, TECHNOLOGIES AND SERVICES MOVING THE INDUSTRY FORWARD GARMIN INNOVATION BRINGS FULL INTEGRATION TO BUSINESS FLIGHT OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT From web-based flight planning, fleet scheduling and tracking services to integrated flight display technology, head-up displays, advanced RNP navigation, onboard weather radar, Data Comm datalinks and much more — Garmin offers an unrivaled range of options to help make flying as smooth, safe, seamless and reliable as it can possibly be. Whether you operate a business jet, turboprop or hard-working helicopter, you can look to Garmin for industry-leading solutions scaled to fit your needs and your cockpit. The fact is, no other leading avionics manufacturer offers such breadth of capability — or such versatile configurability — in its lineup of flight deck solutions for aircraft manufacturers and aftermarket upgrades. When it comes to bringing out the best in your aircraft, Garmin innovation makes all the difference. CREATING A VIRTUAL REVOLUTION IN GLASS FLIGHT DECK SOLUTIONS By presenting key aircraft performance, navigation, weather, terrain routings and so on. The map function is designed to interface with a and traffic information, in context, on large high-resolution color variety of sensor inputs, so it’s easy to overlay weather, lightning, traffic, displays, today’s Garmin glass systems bring a whole new level of terrain, towers, powerlines and other avoidance system advisories, as clarity and simplicity to flight. The screens offer wide viewing angles, desired. These display inputs are selectable, allowing the pilot to add advanced backlighting and crystal-sharp readability, even in bright or deselect overlays to “build at will” the map view he or she prefers for sunlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Study for an Integrated Digital/Electric Aircraft (IDEA)
    NASA-CR-3840 19850007405 NASA Contractor Report 3840 t i Systems Study for an Integrated Digital/Electric Aircraft (IDEA) G. E. Tagge, L. A. Irish, and A. R.Bailey CONTRACT NAS1-17528 JANUARY 1985 R [_.._ _ _ _'l _ €__!7 . ','7:2! ' ;: ;; 11) LANGLEY RESEJtRCHCEI",I_ER LIBRARY, NASA H;_4MPTO_JVIRG_N!A, NASA Contractor Report 3840 Systems Study for an Integrated Digital/Electric Aircraft (IDEA) G. E. Tagge, L. A. Irish, and A. R. Bailey Boeing Commercial Airplane Company Seattle, Washington Prepared for Langley Research Center under Contract NAS1-17528 N/ A NationalAeronautics and SpaceAdministration Scientific and Technical IntormatlonBranch 1985 FOREWORD This document constitutes the final report of the Integrated Digital/Electric Aircraft (IDEA)Program,ContractNASI-17528. The major studyobjectiveweres to definethe configurationof an IDEA aircraftd,efine technicalrisksassociatedwith the IDEA systemsconcepts,and identifytheresearchand developmentrequiredto reducetheserisksforpotentialapplicationto transporatircraft intheearly1990s. The NASA TechnicalRepresentativeforthistaskwas Cary R. SF1tzer;the Contracting Officerwas James Y. Taylor,of theLangleyResearchCenter. The work was accompUshed withinthe PreUmlnaryDesign Department of the Boeing Commercial AirplaneCompany. Key personnelwho contrlbutewdere: G. E.Tagge ProgramManager L.A. Irish StudyManager J.D.Vachal AerodynamicsTechnology L.A. Ostrom AerodynamicsTechnology R. H. Johnson PropulslonTeclmology G. G. Redfield PropulsionTechnology A. R. Bailey WeightsTechnology K. E. Siedentopf We_,_htsTechnology D. L.Grande StructuresTechnology C. B. Crumb Electronic FlightControlDesign F.Byford Mechanical FlightControlDesign W. F. Shivttz Flight Systems Technology C. W. Lee Flight Systems Technology P.J.Campbell FUght Systems Technology J. W. Harper Airframe Systems Technology-Electrlcal K. T. Tanemura AirframeSystemsTechnology-ECS E. C. Lim AirframeSystemsTechnology-ECS R. A. Johnson AirframeSystemsTechnology-ECS D. E. Cozby AirframeSystemsTechnology-lcing J.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Outer-Loop Control Factors for Carrier Aircraft
    Robert Heffley Engineering 349 First Street, Los Altos, CA 94022, USA Telephone: (650) 949-1747 FAX: (650) 949-1243 RHE-NAV-90-TR-1 OUTER-LOOP CONTROL FACTORS FOR CARRIER AIRCRAFT Robert K. Heffley 1 December 1990 CONTRACT SUMMARY REPORT Distribution authorized to U. S. Government agencies and their contractors; (Critical technology). Other requests for this document will be referred to the Naval Air Systems Command (AIR-5301). Prepared for: Naval Air Systems Command Department of the Navy Washington DC 20361 This report was prepared under Contract N00019-89-C-0259 which was competitively awarded for a total cost of $52,998. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK UNCLASSIFIED Page i SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1a. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 1b. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS UNCLASSIFIED 2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY OF REPORT Distribution authorized to U. S. Government agencies and their 2b. DECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE contractors; (Critical technology). Other requests for this document will be referred to the Naval Air Systems Command (AIR-5301). 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) RHE-NAV-90-TR-1 6a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION Robert Heffley Engineering (I f applicable) Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command, AIR-5301 6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 349 First Street Los Altos, CA 94022 Washington, DC 20361 8a. NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING 8b. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ORGANIZATION (If applicable) Contract N00019-89-C-0259 Naval Air Systems Command AIR-5301 8c.
    [Show full text]
  • F35C Joint Strike Fighter Additive Manufacturing Tailhook Redesign
    F­35C Joint Strike Fighter Additive Manufacturing Tailhook Redesign 4/24/16 Submitted to Lockheed Martin Representative Team EDSGN 100, Section: 23 Group 4: Kiran Judd, James Harris, Madeline Woody, and Zach Ceneviva Abstract: The objective for the project was to design, prototype, and manufacture an effective ​ redesign of the Lockheed Martin F­35C tailhook, utilizing additive manufacturing. The F­35C tailhook, like many other subtractive manufactured parts, suffers from a waste of excess material and limitations when creating advanced designs. The main question relating to the current process is how does one eliminate the total amount of material used, while still retaining the original strength? For this reason, when designing the prototype material reduction, affordability, accessibility in the field, effectiveness, and durability were treated with the utmost importance with respect to design criteria. After the printing of the prototype, it was necessary to test the design criteria in order to see if the efficiency and reliability met the desired goals for the tailhook. The tailhook prototype did not pass all of the set criteria for its design, but performed especially well when compared to the set criteria for the durability. Although the initial prototype performed well during the durability test, it did not perform as well as hoped within the material reduction, affordability, and effectiveness categories. These areas proved to be lacking, leading to corrections which would later lead to the improved second prototype, created by the team. Following the improvements implemented within the second prototype, an effective, durable tailhook was created utilizing additive manufacturing processes. Table of Contents Introduction Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • F/A-18A-D Hornet Current and Future Utilization of Mode I Automatic Carrier Landings
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2007 F/A-18A-D Hornet Current and Future Utilization of Mode I Automatic Carrier Landings Brian T. Schrum University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Navigation, Guidance, Control and Dynamics Commons Recommended Citation Schrum, Brian T., "F/A-18A-D Hornet Current and Future Utilization of Mode I Automatic Carrier Landings. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/323 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Brian T. Schrum entitled "F/A-18A-D Hornet Current and Future Utilization of Mode I Automatic Carrier Landings." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Robert B. Richards, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Peter Solies, Rodney Allison Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Brian T.
    [Show full text]