Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Lynchi) 5-Year

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Lynchi) 5-Year Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Copyright: Larry Serpa U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Sacramento, California September 2007 1 Oregon Idaho 5 101 80 Carson City Nevada Sacramento San Francisco Oakland San Jose Fresno Las Vegas 101 99 15 5 40 Los Angeles ESA Five Year Review Santa Ana 10 Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Long Beach Branchinecta lynchi San Diego CNDDB occurences 037.5 75 150 Miles SFWO GIS Branch 5/2007 1 5-YEAR REVIEW Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) I. GENERAL INFORMATION I.A. Methodology used to complete the review: This review was an individual effort by Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office staff using information from the following sources: the December 2005 Recovery Plan for Vernal Pool Ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon (Recovery Plan) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [Service] 2005); the September 1999 Vernal Pools of Southern California Recovery Plan (Service 1998); the June 2006 Draft Recovery Plan for Species of the Rogue Valley Vernal Pool and Illinois Valley Wet Meadow Ecosystems (Service 2006a); species survey and monitoring reports; peer-reviewed journal articles; documents generated as part of Endangered Species Act section 7 and section 10 consultations; and species experts including botanists, biologists, and land-managers from the U.S. Forest Service, California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and the Service. We also considered information from a Service-contracted report. The Recovery Plan, section 7 consultations, electronic messages from the Service’s Carlsbad and Ventura Fish and Wildlife Offices, and communications with species experts and land-managers were the primary sources of information used to update the “species status” and “threats” sections of this review. I.B. Contacts Lead Regional or Headquarters Office – Diane Elam, Deputy Division Chief for Listing, Recovery, and Habitat Conservation Planning, and Jenness McBride, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, California/Nevada Operations Office, 916-414-6464 Lead Field Office – Kirsten Tarp, Recovery Branch, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, 916-414-6600. Cooperating Field Offices –Ventura and Carlsbad, California, and Roseburg, Oregon I.C. Background I.C.1. FR Notice citations announcing initiation of this review: On March 22, 2006, the Service announced initiation of the 5-year review for the vernal pool fairy shrimp and asked for information from the public regarding the species’ status (71 FR 14538). On April 3, 2006, a corrected announcement was issued to correct contact information for Service field offices (71 FR 16584). In response to this notice, we received information providing status of known vernal pool fairy shrimp locations at Fort Hunter Liggett Army Reserve Training Site in southern Monterey County and negative survey findings for Camp Parks Reserve Training Site in Contra Costa and Alameda counties (L. Clark, U.S. Army, in litt. 2006). 2 I.C.2. Listing history Original Listing FR notice: 59 FR 48136 Date listed: September 19, 1994 Entity listed: Species, vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) Classification: Threatened I.C.3. Associated rulemakings: Critical Habitat Listed: Critical habitat for the vernal pool fairy shrimp was originally designated in a final rule published in 68 FR 46683 on August 6, 2003. A revised final rule for critical habitat, with a re-evaluation of non-economic exclusions, was published in 70 FR 11140 on March 8, 2005. Economic exclusions from the 2003 final rule were evaluated in 70 FR 46923; published on August 11, 2005. Administrative revisions with species-by-unit designations were published in 71 FR 7117 on February 10, 2006, providing 35 critical habitat units for the vernal pool fairy shrimp totaling 597,821 acres. On May 31, 2007, the Service published a clarification of the economic and non-economic exclusions for the 2005 final rule designating critical habitat for four vernal pool crustaceans and eleven vernal pool plants in California and southern Oregon (72 FR 30269). I.C.4. Review History 90-Day finding: A 90-day finding on a petition to delist the vernal pool fairy shrimp and vernal pool tadpole shrimp was published in 65 FR 18026 on April 6, 2000. The finding determined that the petition and additional information did not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that delisting the vernal pool fairy shrimp was warranted. I.C.5. Species’ Recovery Priority Number at start of review: The vernal pool fairy shrimp has a recovery priority number of 2C (based on a 1-18 ranking system where 1 indicates the highest recovery priority and 18 the lowest priority), which signifies that the species is subject to a high degree of threat, but also has a high potential for recovery. The “C” indicates the potential for conflict between species recovery and construction activities, development, or other economic activities (Service 2005 Recovery Datacall). I.C.6. Recovery Plan or Outline Name of plan: Recovery Plan for Vernal Pool Ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon Date issued: December 15, 2005 The Recovery Plan for Vernal Pool Ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon is the only recovery plan that provides recovery criteria for the vernal pool fairy shrimp; however, two other recovery plans do provide information pertaining to the shrimp. The Draft Recovery Plan for Listed Species of the Rogue Valley Vernal Pool and Illinois Valley Wet Meadow Systems (Service 2006a) provides recovery actions specific to the Oregon range of the vernal pool fairy shrimp. The recovery actions in the draft recovery plan for Oregon occurrences respond to the recovery criteria identified in the broader Recovery Plan for Vernal Pool Ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon (Service 2005a) by providing site-specific recovery actions for 3 the shrimp within the Klamath Mountains Recovery Unit; they are not, however, “recovery criteria” required to delist the species. The Recovery Plan for Vernal Pools of Southern California (Service 1998) provides recovery guidance for several areas in which vernal pool fairy shrimp are located in Los Angeles and Riverside Counties, to the extent that the species co- occurs with the endangered Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus woottoni). II. REVIEW ANALYSIS Species Overview The vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) is a small freshwater crustacean (0.12 to 1.5 inches long) belonging to an ancient order of branchiopods, the Anostraca. Like other anostracans, it has stalked compound eyes and eleven pairs of phyllopods (swimming legs that also function as gills). The vernal pool fairy shrimp is genetically distinct from other Branchinecta species, and is distinguished by the morphology of the male’s second antenna and the female’s third thoracic segment (on the middle part of its body) (Belk and Fugate 2000, as cited in Service 2005a). The species was first collected between 1874 and 1941, when it was described incorrectly as Branchinecta colorodensis (Linder 1941 in Service 2005a). Its identity as a separate species was resolved only in 1990 (Eng et al. 1990). Subsequent genetic analysis has confirmed that the vernal pool fairy shrimp is a distinct species (Fugate 1992). The vernal pool fairy shrimp is endemic to California and the Agate Desert of southern Oregon. It has the widest geographic range of the federally-listed vernal pool crustaceans, but it is seldom abundant where found, especially where it co-occurs with other species (Eng et al. 1990; Eriksen and Belk 1999). The vernal pool fairy shrimp has an ephemeral life cycle and exists only in vernal pools or vernal pool-like habitats; the species does not occur in riverine, marine, or other permanent bodies of water. Roughly 80 percent of observations of the shrimp are from vernal pools (Helm 1998; Helm and Vollmar 2002). Like most other fairy shrimps, the vernal pool fairy shrimp lacks any substantial anti-predator defenses and does not persist in waters with fish (King et al. 1996; Eriksen and Belk 1999). When the temporary pools dry, offspring persist in suspended development as desiccation-resistant embryos (commonly called cysts) in the pool substrate until the return of winter rains and appropriate temperatures allow some of the cysts to hatch (Eriksen and Belk 1999). Vernal pool habitats form in depressions above an impervious substrate layer, or claypan/duripan, in alluvial fans and terraces that are known primarily from the eastern side of the Central Valley of California (Vollmar 2002). Due to local topography and geology, the depressions are part of an undulating landscape, where soil mounds are interspersed with basins, swales, and drainages. Both flooding and the movement of wildlife within vernal pool complexes allow fairy shrimp to disperse between individual pools. These movement patterns, as well as genetic evidence, indicate that vernal pool fairy shrimp populations are defined by entire vernal pool complexes, rather than individual pools (King et al. 1996; Fugate 1998). The vernal pool fairy shrimp occurs only in cool-water pools. Individuals hatch from cysts during cold-weather winter storms; they require water temperatures of 50oF or lower to hatch (Helm 1998; Eriksen and Belk 1999). The time to maturity and reproduction is temperature- dependent, varying between 18 days and 147 days, with a mean of 39.7 days (Helm 1998). 4 Immature and adult shrimp are known to die off when water temperatures rise to approximately 75oF (Helm 1998). The range of the species extends from disjunct locations in Riverside County and the Coast Ranges, north through Central Valley grasslands to Tehama County, and then to a disjunct area of remnant vernal pool habitat in the Agate Desert of Oregon. In general, the vernal pool fairy shrimp has a sporadic distribution within the vernal pool complexes, with most pools being uninhabited by the species (59 FR 48136). Helm (1998) found vernal pool fairy shrimp in 16.3 percent of pools sampled across 27 counties, while Sugnet and Associates, in 1993, found the species in 5 percent of 3,092 locations sampled over much of the range (Service 2005a).
Recommended publications
  • Fig. Ap. 2.1. Denton Tending His Fairy Shrimp Collection
    Fig. Ap. 2.1. Denton tending his fairy shrimp collection. 176 Appendix 1 Hatching and Rearing Back in the bowels of this book we noted that However, salts may leach from soils to ultimately if one takes dry soil samples from a pool basin, make the water salty, a situation which commonly preferably at its deepest point, one can then "just turns off hatching. Tap water is usually unsatis- add water and stir". In a day or two nauplii ap- factory, either because it has high TDS, or because pear if their cysts are present. O.K., so they won't it contains chlorine or chloramine, disinfectants always appear, but you get the idea. which may inhibit hatching or kill emerging If your desire is to hatch and rear fairy nauplii. shrimps the hi-tech way, you should get some As you have read time and again in Chapter 5, guidance from Brendonck et al. (1990) and temperature is an important environmental cue for Maeda-Martinez et al. (1995c). If you merely coaxing larvae from their dormant state. You can want to see what an anostracan is like, buy some guess what temperatures might need to be ap- Artemia cysts at the local aquarium shop and fol- proximated given the sample's origin. Try incu- low directions on the container. Should you wish bation at about 3-5°C if it came from the moun- to find out what's in your favorite pool, or gather tains or high desert. If from California grass- together sufficient animals for a study of behavior lands, 10° is a good level at which to start.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) Inferred from Nuclear 18S Ribosomal DNA (18S Rdna) Sequences
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25 (2002) 535–544 www.academicpress.com Phylogenetic analysis of anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) inferred from nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) sequences Peter H.H. Weekers,a,* Gopal Murugan,a,1 Jacques R. Vanfleteren,a Denton Belk,b and Henri J. Dumonta a Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium b Biology Department, Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78207, USA Received 20 February 2001; received in revised form 18 June 2002 Abstract The nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) of 27 anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) belonging to 14 genera and eight out of nine traditionally recognized families has been sequenced and used for phylogenetic analysis. The 18S rDNA phylogeny shows that the anostracans are monophyletic. The taxa under examination form two clades of subordinal level and eight clades of family level. Two families the Polyartemiidae and Linderiellidae are suppressed and merged with the Chirocephalidae, of which together they form a subfamily. In contrast, the Parartemiinae are removed from the Branchipodidae, raised to family level (Parartemiidae) and cluster as a sister group to the Artemiidae in a clade defined here as the Artemiina (new suborder). A number of morphological traits support this new suborder. The Branchipodidae are separated into two families, the Branchipodidae and Ta- nymastigidae (new family). The relationship between Dendrocephalus and Thamnocephalus requires further study and needs the addition of Branchinella sequences to decide whether the Thamnocephalidae are monophyletic. Surprisingly, Polyartemiella hazeni and Polyartemia forcipata (‘‘Family’’ Polyartemiidae), with 17 and 19 thoracic segments and pairs of trunk limb as opposed to all other anostracans with only 11 pairs, do not cluster but are separated by Linderiella santarosae (‘‘Family’’ Linderiellidae), which has 11 pairs of trunk limbs.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2020 Volume XCVI Number 7
    July 2020 Volume XCVI Number 7 Commodore’s Reports Race Results Tennis Fleet New Members July • August 2020 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY JULY 2 3 4 GALLEY WINDOW BAR RESUMES DECKHANDS LOCKER 1 HOURS NORMAL OPERATING HOURS (JULY 1) Contact Margaret Peebles Bulkhead Race Federal Holiday HAPPY 4th THURS & FRI 4-9p SAT 12-6p at (808) 342-1037 or email Mon-Fri Open 4p Dinghy Race SUNDAY 12-7p Sat Open 10a [email protected] 6p Sharp Start Sun Open 9a (Subject to Change) to make an appointment. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Deckhands Meeting 6p CG #14 6:30p- TBD Bulkhead Race Dinghy Race 6p Sharp Start ORF Singlehanded CG #17 6:30p - TBD 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Classboat H Mooring 6p F & P 6:30p Bulkhead Race Dinghy Race IRF B-3 6p Sharp Start 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Membership 6p Fleet Ops 6p Bulkhead Race Dinghy Race 6p Sharp Start JR Sailing Session 4 Begins 26 27 28 29 30 31 OFFICE HOURS WED-SUN Classboat B Bulkhead Race Dinghy Race 9a-4p BOD 7p 6p Sharp Start (Subject to Change) SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY August BAR HOURS OFFICE HOURS 1 WED-SUN Mon-Fri Open 4p 9a-4p Sat Open 10a Sun Open 9a (Subject to Change) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Deckhands Meeting 6p CG #14 6:30p- TBD Bulkhead Race Dinghy Race 6p Sharp Start CG #17 6:30p - TBD 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Mooring 6p F & P 6:30p Bulkhead Race Dinghy Race 6p Sharp Start 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Admissions Day Membership 6p Fleet Ops 6p Bulkhead Race Dinghy Race 6p Sharp Start 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 _____________________ ___________________ Bulkhead Race Dinghy Race 30 31 BOD 7p 6p Sharp Start RED = KYC Meeting BLUE = KYC Event / Racing GREEN = Deckhands Locker PURPLE= Holidays Black=Yoga /Revised Hours On the cover: Puanani at anchor in Waimea Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Status of Anostraca in Pakistan
    Int. J. Biol. Res., 2(1): 1-7, 2014. UPDATED STATUS OF ANOSTRACA IN PAKISTAN Quddusi B. Kazmi1* and Razia Sultana2 1Marine Reference Collection and Resource Center; University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan 2Food & Marine Resources Research Center, PCSIR Laboratories Complex Karachi; Karachi-75270, Pakistan *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Previously, nine species of the order Anostraca have been reported from Pakistan viz, Branchinella hardingi (Qadri and Baqai, 1956), B. spinosa (H. Milne Edwards, 1840) (now Phallocryptus spinosa), Streptocephalus simplex, 1906, S. dichotomus Baird, 1860, S. maliricus Qadri and Baqai, 1956, S. lahorensis Ghauri and Mahoon, 1980, Branchipus schaefferi Fischer, 1834, Chirocephalus priscus Daday, 1910 and Artemia sp. In the present report these Pakistani species are reviewed. Streptocephalus dichotomus collected from Pasni (Mekran), housed in the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, USA (cat no. 213712) is inserted herein and another specimen of Streptocephalus sp., from a new locality, collected from Kalat not yet reported, is illustrated and described in this report, thus extending genus range further Northward. The need for further surveys directed towards getting the knowledge necessary in order to correctly understand and manage temporary pools- the elective habitat of large branchiopods is stressed. KEYWORDS: Anostraca, Brianchiopoda, Pakistan, Present status INTRODUCTION Anostraca is one of the four orders of Crustacea in the Class Branchiopoda. It is the most
    [Show full text]
  • Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Lynchi)
    Invertebrates Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi) Status State: Meets the requirements as a “rare, threatened, or endangered species” under CEQA Federal: Threatened Critical Habitat: Designated 2006 (USFWS 2006) Population Trend Global: Declining due to habitat loss and fragmentation (Eriksen and Belk 1999) State: As above Within Inventory Area: Unknown Data Characterization The location database for the vernal pool fairy shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi) within the inventory area includes 6 records from 1993, 1997, and 1999. The majority of locations are vernal pools within non-native grassland. Other natural and artificial habitats have a high probability of being occupied by additional populations of the vernal pool fairy shrimp throughout the grassland habitats within the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area. Beyond the original description (Eng et al. 1990), a scanning electron micrograph of the cyst (resting egg) (Hill and Shepard 1997), and some generalized natural history data (Helm 1997), no peer-reviewed technical literature has been published concerning the vernal pool fairy shrimp. Eriksen and Belk (1999) presented a brief discussion of the vernal pool fairy shrimp and provided a distribution map. Range The vernal pool fairy shrimp is found from Jackson County near Medford, Oregon, throughout the Central Valley, and west to the central Coast Ranges. Isolated southern populations occur on the Santa Rosa Plateau and near Rancho California in Riverside County (Eng et al.1990, Eriksen
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Crustaceans As an Aboriginal Food Resource in the Northern Great Basin
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Freshwater Crustaceans as an Aboriginal Food Resource in the Northern Great Basin Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3w8765rq Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 20(1) ISSN 0191-3557 Authors Henrikson, Lael S Yohe, Robert M, II Newman, Margaret E et al. Publication Date 1998-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Joumal of Califomia and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 72-87 (1998). Freshwater Crustaceans as an Aboriginal Food Resource in the Northern Great Basin LAEL SUZANN HENRIKSON, Bureau of Land Management, Shoshone District, 400 W. F Street, Shoshone, ID 83352. ROBERT M. YOHE II, Archaeological Survey of Idaho, Idaho State Historical Society, 210 Main Street, Boise, ID 83702. MARGARET E. NEWMAN, Dept. of Archaeology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4. MARK DRUSS, Idaho Power Company, 1409 West Main Street, P.O. Box 70. Boise, ID 83707. Phyllopods of the genera Triops, Lepidums, and Branchinecta are common inhabitants of many ephemeral lakes in the American West. Tadpole shrimp (Triops spp. and Lepidums spp.) are known to have been a food source in Mexico, and fairy shrimp fBranchinecta spp.) were eaten by the aborigi­ nal occupants of the Great Basin. Where found, these crustaceans generally occur in numbers large enough to supply abundant calories and nutrients to humans. Several ephemeral lakes studied in the Mojave Desert arul northern Great Basin currently sustain large seasonal populations of these crusta­ ceans and also are surrounded by numerous small prehistoric camp sites that typically contain small artifactual assemblages consisting largely of milling implements.
    [Show full text]
  • California Flats Solar Project
    Appendix E.10 Dry Season Sampling DRY SEASON SAMPLING, INCLUDING GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CYSTS FOR FEDERALLY LISTED LARGE BRANCHIOPODS AT THE CALIFORNIA FLATS SOLAR PROJECT Prepared for: H.T. HARVEY & ASSOCIATES 983 University Avenue, Building D Los Gatos, CA 95032 Contact: Kelly Hardwicke (408) 458-3236 Prepared by: HELM BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING 4600 Karchner Road Sheridan, CA 95681 Contact: Brent Helm (530) 633-0220 September 2013 DRY SEASON SAMPLING, INCLUDING GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CYSTS FOR FEDERALLY LISTED LARGE BRANCHIOPODS AT THE CALIFORNIA FLATS SOLAR PROJECT INTRODUCTION Helm Biological Consulting (HBC) was contracted by H. T. Harvey & Associates (HTH) to conduct dry-season sampling for the presence of large branchiopods (fairy shrimp, tadpole shrimp, and clam shrimp) that are listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (e.g., vernal pool fairy shrimp [Branchinecta lynchi] and longhorn fairy shrimp [Branchinecta longiantenna]) at the California Flats Solar Project (aka “Project”). The contract also included the genetic analysis of any fairy shrimp or tadpole shrimp cysts (embryonic eggs) observed to determine species. The proposed Project consists of approximately 2,615.3 acres (ac) and includes the construction and operation of a 280-megawatt alternating current photovoltaic solar power facility. However, surveys for listed large branchiopods were conducted on a much larger area (i.e., 4,653.45-ac) designated as the “Biological Study Area” (BSA) for the Project (Figure 1), as per direction from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, Douglas pers. comm. 2011). The BSA is located in southeastern unincorporated Monterey County, California, with an access road to Highway 41 that extends south into northern San Luis Obispo County (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Another Successful Summer by Nick Mansbach T’S Been So Long Since I’Ve Written but the Clubs to Spend a Fun Filled Day on the Bay
    COCONUT GROVE SAILING CLUB channelthe serving the community since 1945 OCTOBER 2008 Another Successful Summer by Nick Mansbach t’s been so long since I’ve written but the clubs to spend a fun filled day on the bay. At about sailing world has been busy, busy, busy! I’ll start 10am we loaded all the parents and all the kids by telling you about this year’s summer camp, on all different kinds of club boats; we had Prams, I Opti’s and Sunfish along with which was a tremendous success. This year we all our powerboats (including had a whopping 213 kids our good ‘ol Pontoon boat) and attending! The reason for headed out to the Dinner Key this dramatic increase was sandbar. If you’ve never seen a our staff; they were by Grandmother sailing in a Pram far the best I’ve ever had with their Granddaughter, let the opportunity to work me tell you it’s quite the sight! with, so thank you to all Once we arrived at the Sandbar the instructors and CIT’s everyone got an opportunity to (counselors in training) sail on all the different boats with who made this possible. their brothers, sisters, moms and We also had our second dads and instructors and CIT’s annual “Parent & kids fun day” which also turned as well. out to be a big hit. We started that morning with During our first hour there we were all treated to approximately 25 parents and about 40 kids looking something pretty cool, the Geico Racing Teams continued on page 8 COMMODORE’S REPORT opefully, by the time you get to read this, autumn will be starting to take hold, and the Hlong hot summer will just about be history.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 217/Wednesday, November 9
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices 78843 Permit No. TE–046262 California for the purpose of enhancing Department of the Interior, Bureau of the species’ survival. Land Management (BLM), the San Juan Applicant: Blake Claypool, San Diego, California Permit No. TE–048739 Islands National Monument Advisory Committee (MAC) will meet as The applicant requests a new permit Applicant: Daniel A. Cordova of U.S. indicated below: to take (survey by pursuit) the Quino Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas California DATES: The MAC will hold a public editha quino); and take (harass by meeting Monday, November 28th, 2016. survey, capture, handle, release, collect The applicant requests a permit The meeting will run from 8:30 a.m. to vouchers, and collect branchiopod amendment to take (harass by survey, 4:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at cysts) the Conservancy fairy shrimp capture, handle, release, collect San Juan Island Grange Hall in Friday (Branchinecta conservatio), longhorn vouchers, and collect branchiopod Harbor on San Juan Island. Public fairy shrimp (Branchinecta cysts) the Conservancy fairy shrimp comment periods will be available in (Branchinecta conservatio), longhorn longiantenna), San Diego fairy shrimp the afternoon from noon until 12:30 and fairy shrimp (Branchinecta (Branchinecta sandiegonensis), 3:00 p.m. until 3:30 p.m. Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus longiantenna), and vernal pool tadpole woottoni), and vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi); in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: shrimp (Lepidurus packardi) in conjunction with survey activities Marcia deChadene`des, San Juan Islands conjunction with survey activities throughout the range of the species in National Monument Manager, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Persistence of Branchinecta Paludosa (Anostraca) in Southern Wyoming, with Notes on Zoogeography
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 13(1): 184-189, 1993 PERSISTENCE OF BRANCHINECTA PALUDOSA (ANOSTRACA) IN SOUTHERN WYOMING, WITH NOTES ON ZOOGEOGRAPHY James F. Saunders III, Denton Belk, and Richard Dufford ABSTRACT The fairy shrimp Branchinectapaludosa is a persistentresident of aestival ponds at high elevation in the Medicine Bow Mountains of southernWyoming. These populationsare far removed from the Arctic tundrahabitat that typifiesthe distributionof the species, and appear to representthe southern margin of the range in North America. All of the records for the northernUnited States and southernCanada appear to lie along the CentralFlyway that is a major migrationroute for waterfowland shorebirdsthat nest in the Arctic. Passive dispersal probablyprovides for frequentcolonization of marginalhabitats and gene flow to established populations. The fairy shrimp Branchinectapaludosa have been deposited in the University of (Muller)is widely distributedin the circum- Colorado Museum (UCM 2192, 2193, polar tundra of the Holarctic region (Vek- 2194). The Snowy Range is an axial rem- hoff, 1990). In Europe, it occurs chiefly at nant which rises about 300 m above the latitudes above 60?N, but there are isolated surrounding Medicine Bow Mountains recordsfrom the High Tatra Mountains on (Houston and others, 1978). The ponds are the borderbetween Czechoslovakiaand Po- mainly in the upperTelephone Creek drain- land at about 49?N (Brtek, 1976). Records age at elevations of 3,200-3,350 m. Most for Russia are typically along the Arctic of the ponds are underlainby the Nash Fork margin, but include the southern tip of the formation (Houston and others, 1978), and Kamchatka Peninsula at 52?N (Linder, the characteristicmetadolomite is present 1932).
    [Show full text]
  • Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan
    COCONUT GROVE WATERFRONT MASTER PLAN ERA / Curtis Rogers / ConsulTech / Paul George Ph.D. Agenda • City's Vision & Community Input • Framework Concepts • December 2006 Schemes • Draft Final Plan – Waterfront Open Space – Civic Core – Maritime Amenities & Facilities – Event Strategy – Roadway Strategy • Next Steps CITY'S VISION & COMMUNITY INPUT City's Vision & Requirements Vision for Coconut Grove's Waterfront • A coastal recreational park • Human scale • Public open space • Connectivity for the pedestrian realm • Waterfront promenades • Diverse open spaces • An active park • Sensitive environmental spoil island connections (real or visual) Requirements • A Plan that reflects the growth and desires of the community • An overhaul of the mooring fields to comply with the Federal Department of Environmental Protection • Spoil islands rehabilitation: cleaned of exotic plants, replanted with native species and redesigned for public access - Coconut Grove Waterfront & Spoil Islands Request for Qualifications Community Input 2004 Peacock Park Charrette • Lead by Friends of Peacock Park to develop a vision for the future of the Peacock Park • Charrette concepts: – Enhance landscaped open spaces – Minimal service parking only – Trim and "window" mangroves – Connection to spoil islands – Tie into local history – Redesign street frontage and articulate entrances – Redesign and seek alternative uses for Glass House – Outdoor cultural facility (amphitheater, waterfront plaza) – Hardcourts ok, no expansion Public Process • Stakeholder Input – May 2005
    [Show full text]
  • Longhorn Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Longiantenna)
    species is known from the Flying M Ranch, on University of California lands, and on the Ichord Ranch where it is currently threatened by indirect and cumulative effects associated with the development of the University of California, Merced campus. e. Conservation Efforts On September 19, 1994, the final rule to list the Conservancy fairy shrimp as endangered was published in the Federal Register (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994a). In 2005, critical habitat was designated for the Conservancy fairy shrimp and several other vernal pool species in Final Designation of Critical Habitat for Four Vernal Pool Crustaceans and Eleven Vernal Pool Plants in California and Southern Oregon; Evaluation of Economic Exclusions From August 2003 Final Designation; Final Rule (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2005). Within the Northeastern Sacramento Vernal Pool Region, the Conservancy fairy shrimp is protected at the Vina Plains preserve owned by the Nature Conservancy. In the Solano-Colusa Vernal Pool Region the Conservancy fairy shrimp is protected on lands within the Jepson Prairie Ecosystem, including the Burke Ranch and the Jepson Prairie Preserve owned by the Solano County Open Space and Farmland Conservancy and jointly managed by the University of California Reserve System at the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge in Glenn County and in the Tule Ranch unit of the California Department of Fish and Game Yolo Basin Wildlife Area, in Yolo County. In the San Joaquin Vernal Pool Region, Conservancy fairy shrimp populations are protected at Grasslands Ecological Area on State and federally owned lands, and on the Arena Plains National Wildlife Refuge and the San Luis National Wildlife Refuge in Merced County (California Natural Diversity Database 2005).
    [Show full text]