California Flats Solar Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

California Flats Solar Project Appendix E.10 Dry Season Sampling DRY SEASON SAMPLING, INCLUDING GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CYSTS FOR FEDERALLY LISTED LARGE BRANCHIOPODS AT THE CALIFORNIA FLATS SOLAR PROJECT Prepared for: H.T. HARVEY & ASSOCIATES 983 University Avenue, Building D Los Gatos, CA 95032 Contact: Kelly Hardwicke (408) 458-3236 Prepared by: HELM BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING 4600 Karchner Road Sheridan, CA 95681 Contact: Brent Helm (530) 633-0220 September 2013 DRY SEASON SAMPLING, INCLUDING GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CYSTS FOR FEDERALLY LISTED LARGE BRANCHIOPODS AT THE CALIFORNIA FLATS SOLAR PROJECT INTRODUCTION Helm Biological Consulting (HBC) was contracted by H. T. Harvey & Associates (HTH) to conduct dry-season sampling for the presence of large branchiopods (fairy shrimp, tadpole shrimp, and clam shrimp) that are listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (e.g., vernal pool fairy shrimp [Branchinecta lynchi] and longhorn fairy shrimp [Branchinecta longiantenna]) at the California Flats Solar Project (aka “Project”). The contract also included the genetic analysis of any fairy shrimp or tadpole shrimp cysts (embryonic eggs) observed to determine species. The proposed Project consists of approximately 2,615.3 acres (ac) and includes the construction and operation of a 280-megawatt alternating current photovoltaic solar power facility. However, surveys for listed large branchiopods were conducted on a much larger area (i.e., 4,653.45-ac) designated as the “Biological Study Area” (BSA) for the Project (Figure 1), as per direction from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, Douglas pers. comm. 2011). The BSA is located in southeastern unincorporated Monterey County, California, with an access road to Highway 41 that extends south into northern San Luis Obispo County (Figure 1). More specifically, the BSA is located along the eastern rim of the Cholame Valley and occurs on three U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle maps: The Dark Hole, Cholame Valley, and Cholame (Figure 2). Elevations range from 1,180 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the southern end of the access road where it intersects with Highway 41, to approximately 1,860 feet above msl along the northwest edge of the BSA. Dry-season Sampling and Genetic Analysis Ph: (530) 633-0220 California Flats Solar Project Fax: (530) 633-0230 1 This report discusses the methods and results of dry-season sampling at the California Flats Solar Project and genetic analysis of large branchiopod cysts obtained from this sampling to determine the presence, or presumed absence, of federally listed large branchiopods. “We certify that the information in this survey report and attached exhibits fully and accurately represent our work.” Brent P. Helm Signature _______________________________ Date 9-6-2013 Kelly Hardwicke Signature _______________________________ Date 9-6-2013 Dry-season Sampling and Genetic Analysis Ph: (530) 633-0220 California Flats Solar Project Fax: (530) 633-0230 2 MERCED ^_ FresnoDetail ·|}þ99 ·|}þ33 ·|}þ269 California SA N BE N I TO FRESNO ·|þ}269 ·|}þ145 Hanford ·|}þ25 ^_ ·|}þ198 ·|}þ41 ·|}þ198 KINGS MONTEREY 5 ¤£101 !#$" Project Vicinity ·|}þ33 ·|}þ46 33 229 ·|þ} 46 ·|}þ ·|}þ KERN ·|}þ58 San Luis Obispo ^_ SAN LUIS OBISPO ·|}þ1 0 ± 20 166 |}þ135 ·|}þ Miles · SANTA BARBARA Biological Study Area k e e r C C d h o o la o m w n e o t Cre t o C e k 3 1.5 ·|þ}46 0 3 Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri ± Miles Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013 J:\Reports\BotanyReports\Branchiopod Surveys\2012 Dry SeasonBranchiopod Survey Report\Fig 1 Vicinity Map.mxd Figure 1: Vicinity Map California Flats Solar Project, 2012 Dry Season Branchiopod Survey Report (3308-02) September 2013 P1 LEGEND Biological Study Area Waterbodies Sampled for Branchiopod Cysts W136 Pools with Cysts W146 Pools Found to not Provide Habitat W137 for Large Branchiopods Special Aquatic Sites/ Wetlands W3 ES9 MAIN RANCH RD Other Waters Ephemeral Stream W29 W20A Intermittent Stream W20 W30 W29A W31 Perennial Stream Culvert Vernal pool Vernal pool fairy shrimp cysts fairy shrimp cysts W48 W32 2,200 1,100 0 2,200 W42 ± Feet Versatile fairy shrimp cysts W33 W34 W62 W63 W36 W65 W64 W9 W38 W66 W67 W39 Vernal pool fairy shrimp and versatile fairy shrimp cysts W40 W68 W1A Versatile fairy shrimp cysts W72 W41 W131 W130 W90 W7A W61 W91 W5A W9A W6A W59 W60 W92 W10A W14A W15A W10A Matchline Sheet 1 W129 k e e r C d o o w n t o C o t W118 W115 W114 W110 PD2 W123 W126 W127 W128 Pool with 1 unidentified cyst collected Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Matchline Sheet 2 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed J:\Reports\Botany Reports\Branchiopod Surveys\2012Dry Season Branchiopod Survey Report\Fig 2 ProposedDry Season SampleLocations.mxd Figure 2: Survey Areas and Potentially Suitable Branchiopod Habitat California Flats Solar Project, 2012 Dry Season Branchiopod Survey Report (3308-02) September 2013 METHODS Dr. Brent Helm of HBC and Dr. Kelly Hardwicke of HTH conducted dry-season sampling on November 15, 2013 as authorized by the USFWS (Appendix A). Sampling was conducted under permits TE795930-8 and TE-797267-16 of Section 10(a)(1)(A) of the federal Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., and its implementing regulations. Methods generally followed USFWS’s (1996) Interim Survey Guidelines to Permittees for Recovery Permits under Section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act for the Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods and are described below. All areas that potentially could support federally-listed large branchiopods were sampled. Potential habitat for federally-listed large branchiopods is defined as any seasonal inundated depression that on average ponds water 2.0 inches or greater in depth for 14 or more consecutive days for fairy shrimp and 30 or more consecutive days for tadpole shrimp. Potential habitat characteristics of large branchiopods are based on the life history of Central Valley endemics (Eriksen and Belk 1999; Helm 1998, 1999; Helm and Vollmar 2002). The presence of water marks, algae mats, driftlines, hydrophytic vegetation (“water- loving plants”), slope, contributing watershed, maximum potential ponding depth, and aquatic arthropods (i.e., crustaceans and insects) exoskeletons were helpful indicators for evidence of ponding depth and duration. Habitats that swiftly flow water (e.g., creeks, streams, and ephemeral drainages) or semi-to-permanently inundated areas that support population of predators (e.g. bullfrogs, fish, and crayfish) were not generally considered suitable habitat for federally-listed large branchiopods. Dry-season sampling involved the collection of a minimum of ten-soil sub-samples mainly from the lowest topographic areas within each wetland considered potential habitat onsite. Soil samples were placed in liter-size plastic sealable bags and marked with the project name, basin number, and date. The soil was then transported to HBC’s laboratory for processing and analysis. Soil Analysis In the laboratory, a brine solution was prepared by mixing table salt (NaCl) with lukewarm tap water in a large container. The collected soil material was placed in the brine solution. The soil material was then gently worked by hand to breakdown any persistent soil structure. The organic material rising to the top of the brine solution was skimmed off and placed in a 600-micron diameter pore-size sieve stacked atop a 75-micron diameter pore- Dry-season Sampling and Genetic Analysis Ph: (530) 633-0220 California Flats Solar Project Fax: (530) 633-0230 5 size sieve. The soil material was processed through the top sieve by flushing it with lukewarm tap water while gently rubbing it with a soft-bristle brush. The soil retained from the 75-micron diameter pore size sieve was then removed and thinly (≈1.0 mm) spread into plastic petri dishes. The contents of each petri dish were examined under a 10 to 252-power zoom binocular microscope. A minimum of 0.5-hour was spent searching the contents of each petri dish for large branchiopod cysts (embryonic eggs). Dr. Helm’s large branchiopod cyst reference collection and scanning electron micrographs of cysts (Rabet 2010, Brendock et al. 2008, Hill and Shepard 1998, Mura 1991, Belk 1989, and Gilchrist 1978) were used to identify and compare any cysts observed within the soil samples. There are several species of fairy shrimp within the genus Branchinecta that could occur or are known to occur within the vicinity of the BSA. Hence, any cysts belonging to the genus Branchinecta that was observed within the soils collected onsite were carefully removed from the petri dishes and placed in microcentrifuge tubes. Each tube containing cysts was marked with the wetland number and the number of cysts it contained. Additional soils were collected from W128, W41, W66, W65, W42, and W32 by Kelly Hardwicke on 18 December 2012. Genetic Analysis Vials containing cysts were transported to Dr. Andres Aguilar of the California State University of Los Angeles. In Dr. Aguilar’s laboratory, individual cysts were inspected under a stereo microscope for capsule integrity. Those cysts that were intact were used in DNA isolation steps as follows. Cysts were placed in 1 mL of household bleach (in groups of 10) and incubated at room temperature on a horizontal shaker for 15 minutes. This initial ‘washing’ in bleach decontaminates each cyst from foreign DNA and helps to degrade the tertiary capsule. Following this step, cysts were isolated on filter paper and washed twice in Wash Buffer. Individual cleaned decapsulated cysts were placed in sterile individual 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes for DNA extraction. DNA extraction followed the HotShot method (Montero-Jau 2008). To reduce the risk of contamination all extractions were preformed in a physically isolated room under a positive flow hood.
Recommended publications
  • Fig. Ap. 2.1. Denton Tending His Fairy Shrimp Collection
    Fig. Ap. 2.1. Denton tending his fairy shrimp collection. 176 Appendix 1 Hatching and Rearing Back in the bowels of this book we noted that However, salts may leach from soils to ultimately if one takes dry soil samples from a pool basin, make the water salty, a situation which commonly preferably at its deepest point, one can then "just turns off hatching. Tap water is usually unsatis- add water and stir". In a day or two nauplii ap- factory, either because it has high TDS, or because pear if their cysts are present. O.K., so they won't it contains chlorine or chloramine, disinfectants always appear, but you get the idea. which may inhibit hatching or kill emerging If your desire is to hatch and rear fairy nauplii. shrimps the hi-tech way, you should get some As you have read time and again in Chapter 5, guidance from Brendonck et al. (1990) and temperature is an important environmental cue for Maeda-Martinez et al. (1995c). If you merely coaxing larvae from their dormant state. You can want to see what an anostracan is like, buy some guess what temperatures might need to be ap- Artemia cysts at the local aquarium shop and fol- proximated given the sample's origin. Try incu- low directions on the container. Should you wish bation at about 3-5°C if it came from the moun- to find out what's in your favorite pool, or gather tains or high desert. If from California grass- together sufficient animals for a study of behavior lands, 10° is a good level at which to start.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Lynchi)
    Invertebrates Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi) Status State: Meets the requirements as a “rare, threatened, or endangered species” under CEQA Federal: Threatened Critical Habitat: Designated 2006 (USFWS 2006) Population Trend Global: Declining due to habitat loss and fragmentation (Eriksen and Belk 1999) State: As above Within Inventory Area: Unknown Data Characterization The location database for the vernal pool fairy shrimp (Brachinecta lynchi) within the inventory area includes 6 records from 1993, 1997, and 1999. The majority of locations are vernal pools within non-native grassland. Other natural and artificial habitats have a high probability of being occupied by additional populations of the vernal pool fairy shrimp throughout the grassland habitats within the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area. Beyond the original description (Eng et al. 1990), a scanning electron micrograph of the cyst (resting egg) (Hill and Shepard 1997), and some generalized natural history data (Helm 1997), no peer-reviewed technical literature has been published concerning the vernal pool fairy shrimp. Eriksen and Belk (1999) presented a brief discussion of the vernal pool fairy shrimp and provided a distribution map. Range The vernal pool fairy shrimp is found from Jackson County near Medford, Oregon, throughout the Central Valley, and west to the central Coast Ranges. Isolated southern populations occur on the Santa Rosa Plateau and near Rancho California in Riverside County (Eng et al.1990, Eriksen
    [Show full text]
  • Longhorn Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Longiantenna)
    species is known from the Flying M Ranch, on University of California lands, and on the Ichord Ranch where it is currently threatened by indirect and cumulative effects associated with the development of the University of California, Merced campus. e. Conservation Efforts On September 19, 1994, the final rule to list the Conservancy fairy shrimp as endangered was published in the Federal Register (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994a). In 2005, critical habitat was designated for the Conservancy fairy shrimp and several other vernal pool species in Final Designation of Critical Habitat for Four Vernal Pool Crustaceans and Eleven Vernal Pool Plants in California and Southern Oregon; Evaluation of Economic Exclusions From August 2003 Final Designation; Final Rule (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2005). Within the Northeastern Sacramento Vernal Pool Region, the Conservancy fairy shrimp is protected at the Vina Plains preserve owned by the Nature Conservancy. In the Solano-Colusa Vernal Pool Region the Conservancy fairy shrimp is protected on lands within the Jepson Prairie Ecosystem, including the Burke Ranch and the Jepson Prairie Preserve owned by the Solano County Open Space and Farmland Conservancy and jointly managed by the University of California Reserve System at the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge in Glenn County and in the Tule Ranch unit of the California Department of Fish and Game Yolo Basin Wildlife Area, in Yolo County. In the San Joaquin Vernal Pool Region, Conservancy fairy shrimp populations are protected at Grasslands Ecological Area on State and federally owned lands, and on the Arena Plains National Wildlife Refuge and the San Luis National Wildlife Refuge in Merced County (California Natural Diversity Database 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 67/Thursday, April 6, 2000
    18026 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 67 / Thursday, April 6, 2000 / Proposed Rules By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice list, delist, or reclassify a species to evaluate the best scientific and Chairman Burkes, and Commissioner presents substantial information commercial information available as of Clyburn. indicating that the petitioned action that date. The data and information Vernon A. Williams, may be warranted. To the maximum evaluated were to include relevant Secretary. extent practicable, this finding is to be geographic information on the location [FR Doc. 00±8374 Filed 4±5±00; 8:45 am] made within 90 days of the receipt of of vernal pools and fairy shrimp, BILLING CODE 4915±00±P the petition, and the finding is to be including information generated in published promptly in the Federal section 7 consultations since February Register. If the finding is that 29, 1996. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR substantial information was presented, On September 19, 1994, we published we will commence a status review of the the final rule to list the vernal pool fairy Fish and Wildlife Service involved species. shrimp and vernal pool tadpole shrimp On February 29, 1996, we received a as threatened and endangered, 50 CFR Part 17 petition, dated the same day, to delist respectively, in the Federal Register (59 the vernal pool fairy shrimp FR 48136). The vernal pool fairy shrimp Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (Branchinecta lynchi) and the vernal and vernal pool tadpole shrimp are and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus crustacean species endemic to vernal Petition To Delist the Vernal Pool Fairy packardi).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservancy Fairy Shrimp (Branchinecta Conservatio)
    2. CONSERVANCY FAIRY SHRIMP (BRANCHINECTA CONSERVATIO) a. Description and Taxonomy Taxonomy.—The Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta conservatio) was described by Eng, Belk, and Eriksen (Eng et al. 1990). The type specimens were collected in 1982 at Olcott Lake, Solano County, California. The species name was chosen to honor The Nature Conservancy, an organization responsible for protecting and managing a number of vernal pool ecosystems in California, including several that support populations of this species. Description and Identification.—Conservancy fairy shrimp look similar to other fairy shrimp species (Box 1- Appearance and Identification of Vernal Pool Crustaceans). Conservancy fairy shrimp are characterized by the distal segment of the male’s second antennae, which is about 30 percent shorter than the basal segment, and its tip is bent medially about 90 degrees (Eng et al. 1990). The female brood pouch is fusiform (tapered at each end), typically extends to abdominal segment eight, and has a terminal opening (Eng et al. 1990). Males may be from 14 to 27 millimeters (0.6 to 1.1 inch) in length, and females have been measured between 14.5 and 23 millimeters (0.6 and 0.9 inch) long. Conservancy fairy shrimp can be distinguished from the similar looking midvalley fairy shrimp (Branchinecta mesovallensis) by the shape of two humps on the distal segment of the male's second antennae (Belk and Fugate 2000). The midvalley fairy shrimp's antennae is bent such that the larger of the two humps is anterior (towards the head), whereas this same hump in the Conservancy fairy shrimp is posterior (towards the tail).
    [Show full text]
  • 90-Day Protocol Survey Report for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods, Thomas Juhasz, May 2010
    90-Day Protocol Survey Report For U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods, Thomas Juhasz, May 2010 90-DAY PROTOCOL SURVEY REPORT FOR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE LISTED VERNAL POOL BRANCHIOPODS City of Santa Clarita Santa Clarita Valley, Los Angeles County, California July 1, 2011 Prepared for: Impact Sciences Inc. 234 East Colorado Blvd. Suite 205 Pasadena, CA 91101 Prepared by: Thomas Juhasz P.O. Box 90036 Pasadena, California 91109 Phone (626) 755-5123 July 1, 2011 Daryl Koutnik Impact Sciences Inc. 234 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91101 Subject: 90-Day Protocol Survey Report for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods Santa Clarita Vernal Pool Project Santa Clarita Valley, Los Angeles County, California Dear Mr. Koutnik: I have performed a Wet-Season Protocol Survey for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods of the above referenced property (i.e., “the Site”). This report includes my findings, conclusions, recommendations, and supporting documentation. I appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you should have any questions regarding this report, or if I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (626) 755-5123. Sincerely, Thomas Juhasz cc: Ms. Julie Vanderwier, Ventura office, USFWS Mr. Chris Dellith, Ventura office, USFWS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Ecology and Evolution Shape Species Distributions and Ecological Interactions Across Time and Space
    HOW ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION SHAPE SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS AND ECOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS ACROSS TIME AND SPACE by IULIAN GHERGHEL Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Advisor: Ryan A. Martin Department of Biology CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2021 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of Iulian Gherghel Candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy* Committee Chair Dr. Ryan A. Martin Committee Member Dr. Sarah E. Diamond Committee Member Dr. Jean H. Burns Committee Member Dr. Darin A. Croft Committee Member Dr. Viorel D. Popescu Date of Defense November 17, 2020 * We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein TABLE OF CONTENTS List of tables ........................................................................................................................ v List of figures ..................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... viii Abstract ............................................................................................................................. iix INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1. POSTGLACIAL RECOLONIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA BY SPADEFOOT TOADS: INTEGRATING
    [Show full text]
  • Iv. County/Species List
    IV. COUNTY/SPECIES LIST The following list identifies federally listed or proposed U.S. species by State and County. It has been updated through December 31, 1999. Species listed below with a status of both E and T are generally either endangered or threatened within the specified county. Designation of critical habitat (CH) does not mean that the county constitutes critical habitat, only that critical habitat has been designated for that species (see Addendum A Instructions). Action/ State/County Group name Inverse name Scientific name Status CALIFORNIA ALAMEDA ......... BIRDS ....... PELICAN, BROWN ........................................ Pelicanus occidentalis E PLOVER, WESTERN SNOWY ................................ Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus T RAIL, CALIFORNIA CLAPPER ............................... Rallus longirostris obsoletus E TERN, CALIFORNIA LEAST ................................. Sterna antillarum browni E CRUSTACEAN . LINDERIELLA, CALIFORNIA ................................ Linderiella occidentalis E SHRIMP, LONGHORN FAIRY ................................ Branchinecta longiantenna E SHRIMP, VERNAL POOL FAIRY .............................. Branchinecta lynchi T FISHES ...... GOBY, TIDEWATER ...................................... Eucyclogobius newberryi E SPLITTAIL, SACRAMENTO ................................. Pogonichthys macrolepidotus T INSECTS ..... BUTTERFLY, BAY CHECKERSPOT ........................... Euphydryas editha bayensis T MAMMALS ... FOX, SAN JOAQUIN KIT .................................... Vulpes macrotis
    [Show full text]
  • VERNAL POOL FAIRY SHRIMP Branchinecta Lynchi
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office Species Account VERNAL POOL FAIRY SHRIMP Branchinecta lynchi CLASSIFICATION: Threatened Federal Register 59-48136; September 19, 1994 http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr2692.pdf On October 9, 2007, we published a 5-year review recommending that the species remain listed as threatened. CRITICAL HABITAT: Designated Originally designated in Federal Register 68:46683; August 6, 2003. The designation was revised in FR 70:46923; August 11, 2005. Species by unit designations were published in FR 71:7117 (PDF), February 10, 2006. RECOVERY PLAN: Final Recovery Plan for Vernal Pool Ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon, December 15, 2005. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/060614.pdfhttp://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/0606 14.pdf DESCRIPTION The vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), is a small crustacean in the Branchinectidae family. It ranges in size from ½ to one inch long. Fairy shrimp feed on algae, bacteria, protozoa, rotifers and bits of detritus. Fairy shrimp are aquatic species in the order Anostraca. They have delicate elongate bodies, large stalked compound eyes, no carapaces, and eleven pairs of swimming legs. They glide gracefully upside down, swimming by beating their legs in a complex, wavelike movement that passes from front to back. The vernal pool fairy shrimp occupies a variety of different vernal pool habitats, from small, clear, sandstone rock pools to large, turbid, alkaline, grassland valley floor pools. Although the species has been collected from large vernal pools, including one exceeding 25 acres, it tends to occur in smaller pools. It is most frequently found in pools measuring less than 0.05 acre.
    [Show full text]
  • Agate Desert Vernal Pool Final Draft Functional Assessment Methodology
    AGATE DESERT VERNAL POOL FINAL DRAFT FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Prepared for: April 2007 Agate Desert Technical Advisory Committee In association with Adamus Resource Assessment, Inc. Paul Adamus, Ph.D. AGATE DESERT VERNAL POOL FINAL DRAFT FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Prepared for: April 2007 Agate Desert Technical Advisory Committee 8950 Cal Center Drive Building 3, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95826 916.564.4500 www.esassoc.com Los Angeles Oakland Petaluma Portland San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 204081 In association with Adamus Resource Assessment, Inc. Paul Adamus, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS Agate Desert Vernal Pool Functional Assessment Methodology Page Acknowledgements iii 1 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Unique Ecology of Vernal Pool Wetlands 1-7 1.2 Relationship of Method to Wetland Classification Schemes 1-10 2 Background 2-1 2.1 Overview of Vernal Pools in the Agate Desert 2-1 2.2 Wetland Planning and Conservation in Oregon 2-4 2.3 Agate Desert Technical Advisory Committee 2-5 2.4 Agate Desert Stakeholder Committee 2-5 3 Method Development and Application 3-1 3.1 Indicator and Scoring Notes 3-1 3.2 Method Development 3-2 3.3 Method Application 3-3 3.4 Functions and Values for Vernal Pool Wetland Assessment 3-5 3.5 Functions and Values Selected for Vernal Pools 3-6 3.6 Multiple Scales and Assessment Site Classification 3-18 3.7 Landscape and Pool Indicators 3-19 3.8 Derived Indicators 3-25 3.9 Indicator Scoring Analyses 3-25 4 Scoring Models 4-1 4.1 Scoring Model Development 4-1 4.2 Summary Lists of Indicators
    [Show full text]
  • Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Annual Report to the Wildlife Agencies
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Vernal Pool Survey Report 2010 Riverside Fairy Shrimp pictured 8 April 2011 Vernal Pool Survey Report 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................................2 RIVERSIDE FAIRY SHRIMP.........................................................................................................2 VERNAL POOL FAIRY SHRIMP .................................................................................................2 WESTERN SPADEFOOT................................................................................................................3 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................3 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................................3 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING......................................................................................................3 SITE SELECTION ...........................................................................................................................4 SURVEY METHODS ......................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Branchinecta Lynchi)
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Range-wide phylogeographic structure of the vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) Kristy Deiner1¤*, Joshua M. Hull2, Bernie May1 1 Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America, 2 Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California, United States of America ¤ Current address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornel University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 Wetland habitats across the world are experiencing rapid modification and loss due to accel- erating habitat conversion. Impacts to wetland habitats are particularly acute in California where up to 90% of wetland habitats have been modified or lost. Vernal pool ecosystems OPEN ACCESS have therefore undergone a dramatic loss in habitat and along with them an entire endemic Citation: Deiner K, Hull JM, May B (2017) Range- fauna is under threat of extinction. Recent efforts to conserve vernal pool habitat and associ- wide phylogeographic structure of the vernal pool ated species have involved restoration and creation of vernal pools as well as translocations fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi). PLoS ONE 12 of threatened species. The vernal pool fairy shrimp, Branchinecta lynchi, is one of several (5): e0176266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. endemic and federally listed species being targeted for translocations. To guide reintroduc- pone.0176266 tion and conservation, detailed information on range-wide population structure and diversity Editor: Tzen-Yuh Chiang, National Cheng Kung is needed. We collected genetic data from two mitochondrial genes throughout the known University, TAIWAN extant range of B.
    [Show full text]